T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
(Kapat\u0131lan) 6. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2014\/9312 E., 2014\/11422 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesi<\/p>\n
Mahalli mahkemesinden verilmi\u015f bulunan yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 tahliye davas\u0131na dair karar, daval\u0131 ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla, dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
Dava i\u015fyeri ihtiyac\u0131 nedeniyle tahliye istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
1-HUMK.nun 427.maddesi gere\u011fince \u201cdavada hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f taraf da hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunmak \u015fart\u0131yla h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz edebilir\u201d. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi do\u011frultusunda karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve temyiz eden davac\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131n temyizine ili\u015fkin hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmekte hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2- Daval\u0131n\u0131n temyizine gelince;<\/p>\n
6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.\u2019nun 350\/1. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re ihtiya\u00e7 iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lacak tahliye davalar\u0131n\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde s\u00fcrenin sonunda, belirsiz s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde bu kanunun 328. maddesinde fesih bildirimi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelere uyularak belirlenecek tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir ay i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. TBK.\u2019nun 353. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kiraya veren, daha \u00f6nce veya en ge\u00e7 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrede dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kirac\u0131ya yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirmi\u015fse dava, bildirimi takip eden uzayan bir kira y\u0131l\u0131 sonuna kadar a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, daval\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmese bile mahkemece kendili\u011finden g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Davan\u0131n s\u00fcresinde a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihinin ve s\u00fcresinin bilinmesi zorunludur. Davac\u0131n\u0131n bildirdi\u011fi bu tarihlere daval\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karsa uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6sterecekleri tan\u0131k dahil b\u00fct\u00fcn deliller toplanarak bir hadise olarak \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
Olay\u0131m\u0131za gelince; Taraflar aras\u0131nda imzalanan 01.01.2012 ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 tarihli 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcreli kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi hususunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 19. maddesinde, Kontrat\u0131n sona ermesinden bir ay evvel taraflar yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak ihtarda bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 s\u00fcrece kontrat\u0131n yenilenmi\u015f kabul edilece\u011fi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 11\/12\/2012 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilen ihtarname ile ihtiya\u00e7 nedeniyle ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n tahliye edilmesi bildirilmi\u015f kiralanan\u0131n tahliye edilmemesi \u00fczerine 30.01.2013 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davada i\u015fyeri ihtiyac\u0131 nedeniyle tahliyeye karar verilmesi istenmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ihtarname 1 ay \u00f6ncesi kapsamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00fcresinde kabul edilemez.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenle kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi 01\/01\/2013 tarihinden itibaren 1 y\u0131l s\u00fcre ile yenilenmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda mahkemece 1 Ocak 2013 tarihi itibariyle ba\u015flayan d\u00f6nem y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 30.01.2013 tarihinde a\u00e7\u0131lan dava s\u00fcresinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile tahliyeye karar verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
H\u00fck\u00fcm bu nedenle bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da 1.bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine, 2. bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK.ya 6217 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla eklenen ge\u00e7ici 3.madde h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6zetilerek HUMK.n\u0131n 428.maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, istek halinde pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edenlere iadesine, 22.10.2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 6. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 22.10.2014 tarihli, 2014\/9312 E., 2014\/11422 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 6. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/9312 E., 2014\/11422 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : Kiralanan\u0131n tahliyesi Mahalli mahkemesinden verilmi\u015f bulunan yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 tahliye davas\u0131na dair karar, daval\u0131 ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla, dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. Dava i\u015fyeri ihtiyac\u0131 nedeniyle tahliye istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-HUMK.nun 427.maddesi gere\u011fince \u201cdavada hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f taraf da hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunmak \u015fart\u0131yla h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz edebilir\u201d. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n talebi do\u011frultusunda karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ve temyiz eden davac\u0131n\u0131n karar\u0131n temyizine ili\u015fkin hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131klamam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmekte hukuki yarar\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin REDD\u0130NE, 2- Daval\u0131n\u0131n temyizine gelince; 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK.\u2019nun 350\/1. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re ihtiya\u00e7 iddias\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lacak tahliye davalar\u0131n\u0131n belirli s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde s\u00fcrenin sonunda, belirsiz s\u00fcreli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde bu kanunun 328. maddesinde fesih bildirimi i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrelere uyularak belirlenecek tarihten ba\u015flayarak bir ay i\u00e7inde a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. TBK.\u2019nun 353. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kiraya veren, daha \u00f6nce veya en ge\u00e7 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrede dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kirac\u0131ya yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak bildirmi\u015fse dava, bildirimi takip eden uzayan bir kira y\u0131l\u0131 sonuna kadar a\u00e7\u0131labilir. Dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresi kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, daval\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n