T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n
Hukuk Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2012\/2-799 E., 2013\/389 K.<\/p>\n
VELAYET
\n \u00c7OCU\u011eUN YURT DI\u015eINA \u00c7IKARILMASININ YASAKLANMASI
\n \u00c7OCUKLA HER HAFTA SONU K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130 KURULMASI<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (4721) Madde 324
\n T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (4721) Madde 325
\n T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (4721) Madde 182
\n 1982 ANAYASASI (2709) Madde 13
\n 1982 ANAYASASI (2709) Madde 23<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cvelayet ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 5.Aile Mahkemesi’nce velayete ili\u015fkin as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddine ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n ise kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 27.04.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/427 E., 2010\/574 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 05.07.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/16826 E., 2011\/11499 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
(…1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re davac\u0131-daval\u0131 baban\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir.<\/p>\n
2-Daval\u0131-davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin incelenmesine gelince;<\/p>\n
Velayeti daval\u0131-davac\u0131 annede bulunan 7.12.2005 do\u011fumlu Melis ile davac\u0131-daval\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda her hafta sonu Cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.00’dan Pazar g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 18.00’e kadar ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ya\u015f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla e\u011fitimini, bedeni ve fikri geli\u015fimini olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkileyece\u011fi gibi \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131 daval\u0131-davac\u0131 annenin velayet g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesine engel olu\u015fturur. A\u00e7\u0131klanan y\u00f6nler g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2026)<\/p>\n
gerek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm velayet y\u00f6n\u00fcyle bozularak dosya yerine geri \u00e7evrilmekle, yeniden yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; velayet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahkemece \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
HUKUK GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>\n
Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nca incelenerek direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunduktan sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: <\/p>\n
As\u0131l dava, velayet; kar\u015f\u0131 dava ise, i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 (baba) vekili, m\u00fcvekkili ile daval\u0131n\u0131n evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkilerinden d\u00fcnyaya gelen Melis’i, davac\u0131 baban\u0131n tan\u0131yarak kendi soy ad\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fini, Melis’in anne yan\u0131nda olmas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ahlaki ve di\u011fer bir \u00e7ok y\u00f6nden iyi yeti\u015fmeyece\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin ya\u015fam \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok iyi oldu\u011funu belirterek, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Melis’in velayetinin m\u00fcvekkiline verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (anne) vekili, davac\u0131n\u0131n iddalar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddi ile m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in 500,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmesini kar\u015f\u0131 dava ile talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Dosya kapsam\u0131ndan; taraflar\u0131n evlilik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ili\u015fkilerinden 07.12.2005 do\u011fumlu Melis ad\u0131nda bir k\u0131z \u00e7ocu\u011fu sahibi olduklar\u0131, davac\u0131 baban\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fu 09.06.2006 tarihinde tan\u0131yarak n\u00fcfusuna kaydettirdi\u011fi, davac\u0131 baban\u0131n daha sonra 2007 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir ba\u015fka bayanla evlendi\u011fi ve bu evlili\u011finden hen\u00fcz \u00e7ocu\u011funun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 annenin yabanc\u0131 \u00fclke vatanda\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca, yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda mahkemece ara karar\u0131 ile k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocuk Melis ile davac\u0131 babas\u0131 aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemenin, anne yan\u0131nda olmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na olaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde uzman raporu da dikkate al\u0131narak as\u0131l davada m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun velayetinin davac\u0131 babaya verilmesine y\u00f6nelik istemin reddine, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki konusunda istemin kabul\u00fc ile; m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk 07.12.2005 do\u011fumlu Melis ile davac\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda, her hafta Cumartesi sabah 09:00 Pazar ak\u015fam 18:00, dini bayramlar\u0131n ikinci g\u00fcn\u00fc sabah 09:00, \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc g\u00fcn ak\u015fam 18:00, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Melis 6 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurana kadar her y\u0131l 1 Temmuz sabah 09:00, 20 Temmuz ak\u015fam 18:00, 6 ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131 doldurduktan sonra 1 Temmuz sabah 09:00 – 31 Temmuz ak\u015fam 18:00, resmi bayramlar\u0131n \u00f6\u011flen 12:00 ak\u015fam 18.00 saatleri aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (annenin) talepleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in belirlenen 500,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n, karar kesinle\u015ftikten sonra da ayn\u0131 miktarda davac\u0131 babadan al\u0131narak velayeten daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 anneye \u00f6denmesine, m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuk Melis ‘in yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n karar kesinle\u015ftikten sonra da devam\u0131na dair verdi\u011fi karar\u0131n, taraf vekillerinin temyizleri \u00fczerine, \u00d6zel Daire’ce i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin k\u0131sm\u0131 onanm\u0131\u015f; ancak ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yukar\u0131da belirtilen nedenlerle h\u00fck\u00fcm bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece; \u201cher hafta \u00e7ocukla ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin \u00e7ocu\u011fun geli\u015fimini olumsuz etkileyece\u011finin s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi, uzmanlar\u0131n T\u00fcrk Hukuku’nda d\u00fczenlenmeyen ‘birlikte velayet taraftar\u0131 oldu\u011fu, s\u0131k ili\u015fkinin buna hizmet edece\u011fi, annenin yabanc\u0131 olup \u00e7ocu\u011fu yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p bir daha getirmeyebilece\u011fi\u201d gerek\u00e7eleriyle ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131 davadaki i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olup, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Direnme yoluyla Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k;<\/p>\n
1-Velayeti annede bulunan 7.12.2005 do\u011fumlu Melis ile babas\u0131 aras\u0131nda her hafta sonu Cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.00’dan Pazar g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 18.00’e kadar ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ya\u015f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla e\u011fitimini, bedeni ve fikri geli\u015fimini olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkileyip etkilemeyece\u011fi;<\/p>\n
2-\u00c7ocu\u011fun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n, annenin velayet g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesine engel olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131;<\/p>\n
Burada var\u0131lacak sonuca g\u00f6re, yerel mahkemece, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkinin d\u00fczenlenmesine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fcn yerinde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, noktalar\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu noktada, yerel mahkemenin direnme gerek\u00e7elerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmesinde yarar vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
a) Yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede;<\/p>\n
M\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocu\u011fun anne taraf\u0131ndan yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na ka\u00e7\u0131r\u0131labilece\u011fi endi\u015fesiyle yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131, anneye ait olan velayet g\u00f6revini aksatmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda s\u00fcreklili\u011fi itibariyle de 1982 Anayasas\u0131’nda d\u00fczenlenen ve temel hak niteli\u011finde olan seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r (m.23). <\/p>\n
Temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetler, \u00f6zlerine dokunulmaks\u0131z\u0131n yaln\u0131zca Anayasan\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen sebeplere ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ve ancak kanunla belirli bir s\u00fcre ile s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir(m.13) .<\/p>\n
Anayasa’n\u0131n 23.maddesine g\u00f6re, ilke olarak seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn s\u00fcrekli olarak s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ancak, \u00e7ocu\u011fun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla tedbiren ge\u00e7ici bir s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n
Ayr\u0131ca, Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’ne (\u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 ve Temel \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin Korunmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00f6zle\u015fme’ye) Ek 4 No’lu Protokol\u00fc\u2019n (1968) \u201cbir devletin \u00fclkesi i\u00e7inde seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00fclkesinden ayr\u0131lma \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan 2.maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; \u201cHerkes kendi \u00fclkesi dahil herhangi bir \u00fclkeden ayr\u0131lmakta \u00f6zg\u00fcrd\u00fcr.\u201d<\/p>\n
Ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise; \u201cBu haklar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ulusal g\u00fcvenlik veya kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi yarar\u0131na, kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131, su\u00e7un \u00f6nlenmesi, sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ya da ahlak\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n haklar\u0131n\u0131n ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla, demokratik bir toplumda gerekli ve yasaya uygun k\u0131s\u0131tlamalardan ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir k\u0131s\u0131tlama getirilemez.\u201d (Harr\u0131s\/O’boyle\/Warbr\u0131ck: Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Hukuku, \u00c7evirenler:Mehve\u015f Bing\u00f6ll\u00fc K\u0131lc\u0131-Ula\u015f Karan, Y\u00fcksek Yarg\u0131 Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n Avrupa Standartlar\u0131 Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Rollerinin G\u00fc\u00e7lendirilmesi Ortak Projesi, Avrupa Konseyi-Ankara 2013, Sahife:762) denilmek suretiyle seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, garanti alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda, annesi yabanc\u0131 \u00fclke uyruklu ancak kendisi T\u00fcrk Vatanda\u015f\u0131 olan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yasaklamay\u0131 gerektirecek yasal ko\u015fullar\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 her t\u00fcrl\u00fc duraksamadan uzakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
b) Her hafta sonu ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede ise;<\/p>\n
Ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurma hakk\u0131, anne\/baba ile \u00e7ocu\u011fa belirli g\u00fcn ya da saatlerde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme, birbirlerinden haberdar olma, birbirlerinin ya\u015fam\u0131nda olma, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 etkilenme yetkisi veren bir hakt\u0131r. Bu hak, anne\/baba i\u00e7in oldu\u011fu kadar \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in de bir hakt\u0131r (2003 tarihli \u00c7ocuklarla Ki\u015fisel \u0130li\u015fki Kurulmas\u0131na Dair Avrupa S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi m.4\/1). \u0130li\u015fkide anne\/babal\u0131k duygular\u0131n\u0131n tatmini yan\u0131nda \u00e7ocu\u011fun bedensel, fikri, ruhsal, e\u011fitsel, k\u00fclt\u00fcrel geli\u015fimine y\u00f6nelik yarar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilir. Anne\/baba yarar\u0131 ile \u00e7ocuk yarar\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015f\u0131rsa, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yarar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131n\u0131r (4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu m.182\/II, 325 ve 324).<\/p>\n
Ziyaret g\u00fcnleri olarak, ebeveyn ve \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck ve sorun \u00e7\u0131karmayacak g\u00fcn ve d\u00f6nemler tercih edilir. Bu d\u00f6nemler genellikle hafta sonlar\u0131 ve tatil g\u00fcnleridir. \u00c7ocu\u011fun b\u00fct\u00fcn hafta sonlar\u0131n\u0131 velayet kendisine verilmeyen ebeveynle ge\u00e7irmesi; gerek velayete sahip taraf, gerekse \u00e7ocuk i\u00e7in sak\u0131ncal\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilir. Zira, tatil g\u00fcnleri ve hafta sonlar\u0131nda ki\u015fi kendini psikolojik bak\u0131mdan daha rahat ve serbest hisseder. \u00c7ocu\u011fun bu ayr\u0131cal\u0131kl\u0131 g\u00fcnleri sadece bir tarafta ge\u00e7irmesi; s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 g\u00fcnleri ise, velayeti \u00fcstlenenle ge\u00e7irmesi, velayeti \u00fcstlenenden uzakla\u015fmas\u0131na, so\u011fumas\u0131na, kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa ba\u011flanmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7abilir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6yle bir durumda, velayeti \u00fcstlenen, \u00e7ocu\u011funa fazla zaman ay\u0131ramayabilir, e\u011fitim ve terbiye ile yeti\u015ftirme g\u00f6revini lay\u0131k\u0131yla yerine getirmesi de g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015febilir. Ayr\u0131ca, bo\u015fanma durumunda \u00e7ocuk, anne ve babas\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alg\u0131lamakta g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fck \u00e7ekebilir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6yleyse, ki\u015filerin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan daha uygun olan ve kendilerini daha rahat hissettikleri hafta sonlar\u0131 ve tatil g\u00fcnlerinde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131yla bir arada olabilmesi, bu g\u00fczelli\u011fi ve rahatl\u0131\u011f\u0131 payla\u015fabilmeleri en do\u011fal haklar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, her hafta sonu velayet kendisinde olmayan ebeveynle kalan \u00e7ocu\u011fu nedeniyle velayet kendisinde olan \u00e7ocu\u011fu teslim ve geri alma durumu nedeniyle hafta sonlar\u0131n\u0131 planlayamaz duruma d\u00fc\u015fecektir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6yleyse, ki\u015fisel ili\u015fkide hafta sonlar\u0131 ve tatil g\u00fcnlerinin, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek, ebeveynler taraf\u0131ndan payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 makul ve adildir.<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n
Yerel mahkemece, velayeti daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 annede bulunan 7.12.2005 do\u011fumlu Melis ile davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda her hafta sonu Cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.00’dan Pazar g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 18.00’e kadar ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ya\u015f\u0131, e\u011fitimini, bedeni ve fikri geli\u015fimini olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkileyece\u011finden do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131; yabanc\u0131 uyruklu oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 annenin velayet g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesine engel olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 gibi, \u00e7ocu\u011fun seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131 da a\u015fikard\u0131r. <\/p>\n
T\u00fcm bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, yerel mahkemece, Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nca da yukar\u0131daki ilave gerek\u00e7elerle benimsenen \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131na uyulmak gerekirken \u00f6nceki kararda direnilmesi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu nedenle direnme karar\u0131 bozulmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (anne) vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen ilave gerek\u00e7e ve \u00d6zel Daire bozma karar\u0131nda g\u00f6sterilen nedenlerden dolay\u0131 6217 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 30.maddesi ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019na eklenen \u201cGe\u00e7ici Madde 3\u201d atf\u0131yla uygulanmakta olan 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 429.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 440\/1.maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 20.03.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu’nun 20.03.2013 tarihli, 2012\/2-799 E., 2013\/389 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu 2012\/2-799 E., 2013\/389 K. VELAYET \u00c7OCU\u011eUN YURT DI\u015eINA \u00c7IKARILMASININ YASAKLANMASI \u00c7OCUKLA HER HAFTA SONU K\u0130\u015e\u0130SEL \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130 KURULMASI T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (4721) Madde 324 T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (4721) Madde 325 T\u00dcRK MEDEN\u0130 KANUNU (4721) Madde 182 1982 ANAYASASI (2709) Madde 13 1982 ANAYASASI (2709) Madde 23 “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki \u201cvelayet ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131\u201d davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; Ankara 5.Aile Mahkemesi’nce velayete ili\u015fkin as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddine ve i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131na ili\u015fkin kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n ise kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 27.04.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2009\/427 E., 2010\/574 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n incelenmesi taraf vekilleri taraf\u0131ndan istenilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 05.07.2011 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/16826 E., 2011\/11499 K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile; (…1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuna uygun sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re davac\u0131-daval\u0131 baban\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yersizdir. 2-Daval\u0131-davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin incelenmesine gelince; Velayeti daval\u0131-davac\u0131 annede bulunan 7.12.2005 do\u011fumlu Melis ile davac\u0131-daval\u0131 baba aras\u0131nda her hafta sonu Cumartesi g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 09.00’dan Pazar g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 18.00’e kadar ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn ya\u015f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla e\u011fitimini, bedeni ve fikri geli\u015fimini olumsuz y\u00f6nde etkileyece\u011fi gibi \u00e7ocu\u011fun yurtd\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131 daval\u0131-davac\u0131 annenin velayet g\u00f6revini yerine getirmesine engel olu\u015fturur. A\u00e7\u0131klanan y\u00f6nler g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u2026) gerek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fck\u00fcm velayet y\u00f6n\u00fcyle …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97145","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n