{"id":94745,"date":"2025-05-23T14:37:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-23T11:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-23T14:37:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-23T11:37:00","slug":"yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n<p>7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemesi : Gerede Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<br \/>\n(\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi S\u0131fat\u0131yla)<br \/>\nTarihi : 09\/10\/2013<br \/>\nNumaras\u0131 : 2011\/83-2013\/495<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 N.. \u015e.. taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda trafik cezas\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere kendisinden bono al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu senetleri istedi\u011fini ancak verilmedi\u011fini, protesto \u00fczerine de takibe konuldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, davaya konu 2 adet senetten dolay\u0131 daval\u0131ya bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile bonolar\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esi sunmam\u0131\u015f ancak \u015firket yetkilisi duru\u015fmada ki beyan\u0131nda davac\u0131ya dorse satt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2 adet senet ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dorseyi amcas\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilere kesinlikle a\u00e7\u0131k senet imzalatmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkete 8.500,00 TL bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine, senetlerin iptaline y\u00f6nelik talebin ise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131nda icra takibine konu olan senetlerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131dan teminat senedi olarak al\u0131n\u0131p haks\u0131z olarak takibe mi konuldu\u011fu yoksa davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinden sonra davac\u0131n\u0131n akrabas\u0131 olana H. T. isimli \u015fahsa dorse al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle bir nevi kefalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan bor\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine takibe mi konuldu\u011fu konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Her ne kadar mahkemece \u201cdavac\u0131dan i\u015fe girme kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda senet al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 temsilcisi taraf\u0131ndan beyan edilen r\u00f6mork al\u0131m\u0131 hadisesinin hayat\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na uygunluk arz etmedi\u011fi, kald\u0131 ki senette r\u00f6morku ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen amca o\u011flunun imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131n da daval\u0131 aleyhinde de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi, fatura gibi belgelerin her zaman d\u00fczenlenmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu ve senet miktarlar\u0131 ile faturan\u0131n uygunluk arz etmedi\u011fi\u201d gerek\u00e7eleri ile davaya konu senetlerin teminat senedi olarak al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de gerek davac\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 E. G.\u2019\u00fcn kendisine bo\u015f ka\u011f\u0131t imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmesi ile tan\u0131ktan teminat senedi al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 gerek davac\u0131n\u0131n akrabas\u0131 H. T.&#8217;a olan dorse sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n belgelendirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve \u00f6zellikle daval\u0131 \u015firket hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda daval\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131ks\u0131z senedi icraya koymak su\u00e7undan su\u00e7un s\u00fcbutuna ili\u015fkin beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu senetlerin teminat ama\u00e7l\u0131 verildi\u011fini davac\u0131n\u0131n kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekirken kabul\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olmas\u0131 hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerle BOZULMASINA, bozma nedenine g\u00f6re daval\u0131 N. Ltd. \u015eti.&#8217;nin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde daval\u0131 N. Ltd. \u015eti.&#8217;ne iadesine, 04\/12\/2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bYarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 04\/12\/2014 tarihli, 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi : Gerede Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi (\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi S\u0131fat\u0131yla) Tarihi : 09\/10\/2013 Numaras\u0131 : 2011\/83-2013\/495 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 N.. \u015e.. taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda trafik cezas\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere kendisinden bono al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu senetleri istedi\u011fini ancak verilmedi\u011fini, protesto \u00fczerine de takibe konuldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, davaya konu 2 adet senetten dolay\u0131 daval\u0131ya bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile bonolar\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esi sunmam\u0131\u015f ancak \u015firket yetkilisi duru\u015fmada ki beyan\u0131nda davac\u0131ya dorse satt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2 adet senet ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dorseyi amcas\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilere kesinlikle a\u00e7\u0131k senet imzalatmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkete 8.500,00 TL bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine, senetlerin iptaline y\u00f6nelik talebin ise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Taraflar aras\u0131nda icra takibine konu olan senetlerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131dan teminat senedi olarak al\u0131n\u0131p haks\u0131z olarak takibe mi konuldu\u011fu yoksa davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinden sonra davac\u0131n\u0131n akrabas\u0131 olana H. T. isimli \u015fahsa dorse al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle bir nevi kefalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan bor\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine takibe mi konuldu\u011fu konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r. Her ne kadar mahkemece \u201cdavac\u0131dan i\u015fe girme &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi : Gerede Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi (\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi S\u0131fat\u0131yla) Tarihi : 09\/10\/2013 Numaras\u0131 : 2011\/83-2013\/495 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 N.. \u015e.. taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda trafik cezas\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere kendisinden bono al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu senetleri istedi\u011fini ancak verilmedi\u011fini, protesto \u00fczerine de takibe konuldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, davaya konu 2 adet senetten dolay\u0131 daval\u0131ya bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile bonolar\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esi sunmam\u0131\u015f ancak \u015firket yetkilisi duru\u015fmada ki beyan\u0131nda davac\u0131ya dorse satt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2 adet senet ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dorseyi amcas\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilere kesinlikle a\u00e7\u0131k senet imzalatmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkete 8.500,00 TL bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine, senetlerin iptaline y\u00f6nelik talebin ise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Taraflar aras\u0131nda icra takibine konu olan senetlerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131dan teminat senedi olarak al\u0131n\u0131p haks\u0131z olarak takibe mi konuldu\u011fu yoksa davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinden sonra davac\u0131n\u0131n akrabas\u0131 olana H. T. isimli \u015fahsa dorse al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle bir nevi kefalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan bor\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine takibe mi konuldu\u011fu konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r. Her ne kadar mahkemece \u201cdavac\u0131dan i\u015fe girme &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-23T11:37:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0438\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-23T11:37:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":570,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-23T11:37:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi : Gerede Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi (\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi S\u0131fat\u0131yla) Tarihi : 09\/10\/2013 Numaras\u0131 : 2011\/83-2013\/495 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 N.. \u015e.. taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle, temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda trafik cezas\u0131 gibi durumlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamak \u00fczere kendisinden bono al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bu senetleri istedi\u011fini ancak verilmedi\u011fini, protesto \u00fczerine de takibe konuldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini, davaya konu 2 adet senetten dolay\u0131 daval\u0131ya bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ile bonolar\u0131n iptalini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 cevap dilek\u00e7esi sunmam\u0131\u015f ancak \u015firket yetkilisi duru\u015fmada ki beyan\u0131nda davac\u0131ya dorse satt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 2 adet senet ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n dorseyi amcas\u0131n\u0131n o\u011fluna ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015f\u00e7ilere kesinlikle a\u00e7\u0131k senet imzalatmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 \u015firkete 8.500,00 TL bor\u00e7lu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitine, senetlerin iptaline y\u00f6nelik talebin ise reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Taraflar aras\u0131nda icra takibine konu olan senetlerin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131dan teminat senedi olarak al\u0131n\u0131p haks\u0131z olarak takibe mi konuldu\u011fu yoksa davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin feshinden sonra davac\u0131n\u0131n akrabas\u0131 olana H. T. isimli \u015fahsa dorse al\u0131m sat\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle bir nevi kefalet s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanan bor\u00e7tan dolay\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmemesi \u00fczerine takibe mi konuldu\u011fu konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r. Her ne kadar mahkemece \u201cdavac\u0131dan i\u015fe girme &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-23T11:37:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"3 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0438"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-23T11:37:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":570,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-23T11:37:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-7-hukuk-dairesinin-2014-18310-e-2014-22075-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2014\/18310 E., 2014\/22075 K.. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}