{"id":91662,"date":"2025-05-19T14:41:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-19T11:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/"},"modified":"2025-05-19T14:41:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T11:41:00","slug":"gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/","title":{"rendered":"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2022\/9979 E., 2024\/1280 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 04.10.2022
\nSAYISI : 2021\/2037 E., 2022\/1929 K.
\nDAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 09.10.2019-28.10.2019
\nKARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi
\nTEMY\u0130Z EDEN : Taraf vekilleri
\n\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana 4. Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 10.06.2021
\nSAYISI : 2019\/673 E., 2021\/397 K.<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve fer’\u00eelerine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc k\u0131smen kald\u0131r\u0131larak bu y\u00f6nden yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin di\u011fer y\u00f6nlere ili\u015fkin, davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin ise t\u00fcm istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f, incelemenin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 28.02.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Belli edilen 28.02.2024 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde temyiz eden davac\u0131-daval\u0131 … Ahmet Tekakan vekili Avukat S\u00fcha Topalo\u011flu ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf temyiz eden daval\u0131-davac\u0131 … Tekakan vekili Avukat G\u00f6k\u00e7en Oktay \u00dcst\u00fcnda\u011f geldiler. Gelenlerin s\u00f6zl\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendikten sonra i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen saatte Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlenerek dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I. DAVA
\nDavac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili dava, cevaba cevap (kar\u015f\u0131 davada cevap) dilek\u00e7elerinde \u00f6zetle; taraflar\u0131n 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda evlendi\u011fini, bu evlilikten ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funu, kad\u0131n\u0131n, k\u0131skan\u00e7 oldu\u011funu, duygusal \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, erke\u011fin ailesini istemedi\u011fini ve ailesine hakaret etti\u011fini, hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgilenmedi\u011fini, birlik g\u00f6revini ihmal etti\u011fini, erke\u011fe hakaret etti\u011fini, kar\u015f\u0131 dava dilek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan vak\u0131alar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuki sebebiyle bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, erkek yarar\u0131na 50.000,00 TL manev\u00ee tazminata karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II. CEVAP
\nDaval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n cevap, kar\u015f\u0131 dava ve ikinci cevap (kar\u015f\u0131 davada cevaba cevap) dilek\u00e7elerinde \u00f6zetle; dava dilek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan vak\u0131alar\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, erke\u011fin, fiziksel, ekonomik, psikolojik \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ihlal etti\u011fini, ailesinin evlilik birli\u011fine m\u00fcdahalesine sessiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tehdit etti\u011fini, kad\u0131n\u0131n ailesi ile g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesini engelledi\u011fini, aile mahremiyetine \u00f6zen g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini, birlik g\u00f6revlerini yerine getirmedi\u011fini iddia ederek kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuki sebebiyle bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddine, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n vel\u00e2yetinin anneye verilmesine, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n her biri yarar\u0131na ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ayl\u0131k 1.000,00 TL tedbir nafakas\u0131, 1.000,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, nafakan\u0131n TEFE-T\u00dcFE oran\u0131nda artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na yasal faizi ile birlikte 50.000,00 TL madd\u00ee tazminat, 50.000,00 TL manev\u00ee tazminata karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile, kad\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131skan\u00e7 oldu\u011fu, erke\u011fin ailesini istemedi\u011fi, erke\u011fe ve erke\u011fin ailesine hakaret etti\u011fi; erke\u011fin ise kad\u0131na hakaret etti\u011fi, ekonomik \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015fta bulundu\u011fu, bu hususun t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 ile ispatland\u0131\u011f\u0131, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda taraflar\u0131n e\u015fit kusurlu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuki sebebiyle bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n fiilen anne yan\u0131nda kald\u0131klar\u0131, al\u0131nan beyanlar\u0131, sosyal inceleme raporu i\u00e7eri\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda vel\u00e2yetin anneye verilmesine, ortak \u00e7ocuklarla baba aras\u0131nda ki\u015fisel ili\u015fki kurulmas\u0131na, ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n ya\u015flar\u0131, ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131, taraflar\u0131n ekonomik ve sosyal durumlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak ortak \u00e7ocuk Seren yarar\u0131na dava tarihinden karar tarihine kadar ayl\u0131k 400,00 TL tedbir nafakas\u0131, karar tarihi itibariyle ayl\u0131k 600,00 TL tedbir nafakas\u0131, karar kesinle\u015ftikten sonra ayl\u0131k 600,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, nafakan\u0131n her y\u0131l T\u00dc\u0130K taraf\u0131ndan belirlenen \u00dcFE oran\u0131nda artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, ortak \u00e7ocuk L. yarar\u0131na dava tarihinden karar tarihine kadar ayl\u0131k 350,00 TL tedbir nafakas\u0131, karar tarihi itibariyle ayl\u0131k 450,00 TL tedbir nafakas\u0131, karar kesinle\u015ftikten sonra ayl\u0131k 450,00 TL i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131, nafakan\u0131n her y\u0131l T\u00dc\u0130K taraf\u0131ndan belirlenen \u00dcFE oran\u0131nda artt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda taraflar e\u015fit kusurlu oldu\u011fundan taraflar\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 reddine, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun (4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 169 uncu maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca ortak konutun karar kesinle\u015finceye kadar kad\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fclenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF
\nA. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekilleri istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri
\n1.Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011fu, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda kad\u0131n\u0131n tam kusurlu oldu\u011fu ve kar\u015f\u0131 davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, erke\u011fin manev\u00ee tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, i\u015ftirak nafakalar\u0131 miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok oldu\u011fu belirtilerek; kad\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, manev\u00ee tazminat talebinin reddi, i\u015ftirak nafakalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

2.Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda kad\u0131n\u0131n kusurlu bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, erke\u011fin ise tam kusurlu oldu\u011fu ve as\u0131l davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, as\u0131l davada s\u00fcresinde tan\u0131k deliline dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, erke\u011fin, ortak konuta dair abonelikleri iptal ettirdi\u011fi, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi, nafaka miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n ise az oldu\u011fu belirtilerek; erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, tazminat taleplerinin reddi, nafakalar\u0131n miktar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kusur belirlemesinin hatal\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda; k\u0131skan\u00e7 davran\u0131\u015flar sergileyen, erke\u011fe ve erke\u011fin ailesine hakaret eden, erke\u011fi ve erke\u011fin ailesini ortak konutta istemeyen kad\u0131n\u0131n hafif, g\u00fcven sars\u0131c\u0131 davran\u0131\u015fta bulunan, kad\u0131na hakaretler eden ve ekonomik \u015fiddet uygulayan erke\u011fin ise a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011fu, her iki davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesinin isabetli oldu\u011fu ancak erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 166 nc\u0131 maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu olan erke\u011fin manev\u00ee tazminat isteminin reddine karar verilmesinin isabetli oldu\u011fu, bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu olan erke\u011fin kusurlu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n ayn\u0131 zamanda kad\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 174 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu belirtilerek; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilen y\u00f6nlerden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve bu y\u00f6nlerden yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisine, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin kusur belirlemesine dair karar gerek\u00e7esinin yukar\u0131da belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde d\u00fczeltilmesine, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na yasal faizi ile birlikte 30.000,00 TL madd\u00ee tazminat, 25.000,00 TL manev\u00ee tazminat, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer, davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erke\u011fin ise t\u00fcm istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

V. TEMY\u0130Z
\nA. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar
\nB\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraf vekilleri temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

B. Temyiz Sebepleri
\n1.Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen gerek\u00e7eler ile kusur belirlemesi, tazminatlar, nafakalar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.
\n2.Daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekili temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011fu, istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen gerek\u00e7eler ile erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc, kusur belirlemesi, tazminatlar\u0131n ve nafakalar\u0131n miktarlar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

C. Gerek\u00e7e
\n1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme
\nUyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, taraflarca evlilik birli\u011finin sars\u0131lmas\u0131 hukuki sebebine dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda taraflar aras\u0131nda ortak hayat\u0131 temelinden sarsacak derecede ve birli\u011fin devam\u0131nda imkan vermeyecek nitelikte bir ge\u00e7imsizlik bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ge\u00e7imsizlik var ise kusurun kimden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, erke\u011fin davas\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na madd\u00ee, manev\u00ee tazminat verilmesi \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, ortak \u00e7ocuklar yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilen i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 miktar\u0131n\u0131n dosya kapsam\u0131na ve hakkaniyete uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, erkek yarar\u0131na manev\u00ee tazminat verilmesi \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, as\u0131l davada usul\u00fcnce tan\u0131k deliline dayan\u0131l\u0131p dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 noktas\u0131nda toplanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lgili Hukuk
\n6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanun’un (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 119 uncu maddesi, 141 inci maddesi, 190 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesi, 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 370 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 371 inci maddesi; 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi, 6 nc\u0131 maddesi, 166 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131, 169 uncu maddesi, 174 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131, 182 inci maddesi, 327 inci maddesi, 328 inci maddesi, 330 uncu maddesi; 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun (6098 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 50 inci maddesi, 51 inci maddesi.<\/p>\n

3. De\u011ferlendirme
\n1.Temyizen incelenen karar, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131na, dayand\u0131klar\u0131 belgelere, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131 ile hukuki ili\u015fkinin nitelendirilmesine, dava \u015fartlar\u0131na, yarg\u0131lama ve ispat kurallar\u0131 ile kararda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elere, delillerin takdirinde hata g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine ve \u00f6zellikle her ne kadar B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince kad\u0131na, erke\u011fi ortak konutta istemedi\u011fi vak\u0131as\u0131 kusur olarak y\u00fcklenmi\u015fse de bu vak\u0131aya erkek taraf\u0131ndan dilek\u00e7elerin kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 verilmesi a\u015famas\u0131nda dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, usul\u00fcne uygun olarak dayan\u0131lmayan vak\u0131alar\u0131n kusur olarak y\u00fcklenemeyece\u011finin, ancak yine de bo\u015fanmaya sebebiyet veren olaylarda kad\u0131n\u0131n az kusurlu; erke\u011fin ise a\u011f\u0131r kusurlu oldu\u011funun ve ayr\u0131ca ortak \u00e7ocuk 17.10.2004 do\u011fumlu Seren’in inceleme tarihi itibariyle ergin oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin ise a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki paragraflar\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2.Taraflar\u0131n tespit edilen ekonomik ve sosyal durumlar\u0131na, bo\u015fanmaya yol a\u00e7an olaylardaki kusur derecelerine, paran\u0131n al\u0131m g\u00fcc\u00fcne, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na yap\u0131lan sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ihlal edilen mevcut ve beklenen menfaatlerin kapsam\u0131na nazaran, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmolunan madd\u00ee ve manev\u00ee tazminat azd\u0131r. 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesindeki hakkaniyet ilkesi ile 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 50 nci ve 51 inci madde h\u00fck\u00fcmleri nazara al\u0131narak, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 174 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca daha uygun miktarda madd\u00ee ve manev\u00ee tazminat takdiri gerekirken, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3.Taraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re ortak \u00e7ocuk 2015 do\u011fumlu L. yarar\u0131na takdir edilen i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un hakkaniyet ilkesi ile ilgili 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

VI. KARAR
\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;
\n1.Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kad\u0131n yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilen madd\u00ee ve manev\u00ee tazminat ile ortak \u00e7ocuk L. yarar\u0131na h\u00fckmedilen i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131n\u0131n miktarlar\u0131 y\u00f6nlerinden BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n

2.Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin t\u00fcm, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin ise sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi ile temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozma kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyize konu di\u011fer b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 370 inci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n

Duru\u015fma i\u00e7in takdir olunan 17.100,00 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin …’den al\u0131narak …’e verilmesine,<\/p>\n

Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde …’e iadesine,<\/p>\n

A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden …’e y\u00fckletilmesine,<\/p>\n

Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n

28.02.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bTaraflar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131na, nafakan\u0131n niteli\u011fine, g\u00fcn\u00fcn ekonomik ko\u015fullar\u0131na g\u00f6re ortak \u00e7ocuk 2015 do\u011fumlu L. yarar\u0131na takdir edilen i\u015ftirak nafakas\u0131 azd\u0131r. Mahkemece 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un hakkaniyet ilkesi ile ilgili 4 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesi de dikkate al\u0131narak daha uygun miktarda nafakaya h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekir. Bu y\u00f6n g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/9979 E., 2024\/1280 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 04.10.2022 SAYISI : 2021\/2037 E., 2022\/1929 K. DAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 09.10.2019-28.10.2019 KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi TEMY\u0130Z EDEN : Taraf vekilleri \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana 4. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 10.06.2021 SAYISI : 2019\/673 E., 2021\/397 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve fer’\u00eelerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc k\u0131smen kald\u0131r\u0131larak bu y\u00f6nden yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin di\u011fer y\u00f6nlere ili\u015fkin, davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin ise t\u00fcm istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f, incelemenin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 28.02.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen 28.02.2024 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde temyiz eden davac\u0131-daval\u0131 … Ahmet Tekakan vekili Avukat S\u00fcha …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-91662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nG\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/9979 E., 2024\/1280 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 04.10.2022 SAYISI : 2021\/2037 E., 2022\/1929 K. DAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 09.10.2019-28.10.2019 KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi TEMY\u0130Z EDEN : Taraf vekilleri \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana 4. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 10.06.2021 SAYISI : 2019\/673 E., 2021\/397 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve fer’\u00eelerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc k\u0131smen kald\u0131r\u0131larak bu y\u00f6nden yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin di\u011fer y\u00f6nlere ili\u015fkin, davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin ise t\u00fcm istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f, incelemenin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 28.02.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen 28.02.2024 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde temyiz eden davac\u0131-daval\u0131 … Ahmet Tekakan vekili Avukat S\u00fcha …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-19T11:41:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-19T11:41:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\"},\"wordCount\":2395,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\",\"name\":\"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-19T11:41:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2022\/9979 E., 2024\/1280 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” \u0130NCELENEN KARARIN MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 04.10.2022 SAYISI : 2021\/2037 E., 2022\/1929 K. DAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 09.10.2019-28.10.2019 KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi TEMY\u0130Z EDEN : Taraf vekilleri \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Adana 4. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 10.06.2021 SAYISI : 2019\/673 E., 2021\/397 K. Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile taraflar\u0131n bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na ve fer’\u00eelerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n taraf vekillerince istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc k\u0131smen kald\u0131r\u0131larak bu y\u00f6nden yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na, daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n vekilinin di\u011fer y\u00f6nlere ili\u015fkin, davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekilinin ise t\u00fcm istinaf itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f, incelemenin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 erkek vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda, 28.02.2024 tarihinde duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na ve duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn taraflara davetiye ile bildirilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Belli edilen 28.02.2024 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde temyiz eden davac\u0131-daval\u0131 … Ahmet Tekakan vekili Avukat S\u00fcha …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-19T11:41:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"12 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR","datePublished":"2025-05-19T11:41:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/"},"wordCount":2395,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/","name":"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-19T11:41:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/gunun-ekonomik-kosullarina-gore-600-tl-istirak-nafakasi-azdir\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G\u00dcN\u00dcN EKONOM\u0130K KO\u015eULLARINA G\u00d6RE 600 TL \u0130\u015eT\u0130RAK NAFAKASI AZDIR"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91662\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}