{"id":87534,"date":"2025-05-15T18:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-15T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-15T18:00:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-15T15:00:00","slug":"yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

16. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n

2020\/6231 E., 2021\/2523 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

Su\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme<\/p>\n

Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ KONUSU:<\/p>\n

San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulan her iki su\u00e7un temadi eden su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fiili kesintinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09.12.2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinin tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, her iki dosyan\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.09.2020 tarih ve KD – 2020\/66549 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarihli ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASI talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ NEDENLER\u0130:<\/p>\n

Mezkur ilama Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.09.2020 tarih ve KD – 2020\/66549 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n

\u201cSan\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/3 ve 220\/6 maddeleri delaletiyle 314\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228 Esas- 2016\/5545 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyadaki su\u00e7 tarihinin 28\/03\/2011, iddianame tarihinin ise 12.04.2013 oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu dosyada soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda yakalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 12.12.2012 tarihinde talimatla Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ifadesinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45 Esas- 2013\/80 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi’nin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698 Esas- 2014\/2644 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyadaki su\u00e7 tarihinin 08.12.2011, iddianame tarihinin 21.02.2012 oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu dosyada 09.12.2011 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, 10.12.2011 tarihinde ise tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lmakla;<\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7lar\u0131 temadi eden su\u00e7lardan olup temadi, fiili veya hukuki kesinti ile sona ermektedir. San\u0131k … 28.03.2011 tarihinde ilk eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f ancak bu eylemi fiili veya hukuki kesintiye u\u011framadan bu kez 08.12.2011 tarihinde ikinci fiilini i\u015flemi\u015f bu fiilinden dolay\u0131 09.12.2011 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve akabinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, fiili kesinti bu \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f ve temadi sona ermi\u015ftir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09.12.2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemleri tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere san\u0131k her iki fiilinden dolay\u0131 ayr\u0131 Mahkemelerde yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f, ayr\u0131 cezalar alm\u0131\u015f ve bu cezalar Yarg\u0131tay’ca da onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Oysa bu dosyalar\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bahse konu hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilebilmesi amac\u0131yla her iki dosyan\u0131n da Yarg\u0131tay’ca bozularak, dosyalar\u0131n mahallinde birle\u015ftirilmesini teminen CMK’n\u0131n 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz yoluna gidilmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u201d \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7e ile karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in itiraz isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

III-) \u0130T\u0130RAZ DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130:<\/p>\n

Ani su\u00e7 olarak i\u015flenmesi kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, zorunlu m\u00fctemadi su\u00e7lardand\u0131r. M\u00fctemadi su\u00e7, su\u00e7un tamamlanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen failin su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle neticenin devam etti\u011fi su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. Ba\u015fka bir ifade ile bu su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde hem maddi hem de manevi unsur temadi eder. TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, esas itibariyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lan haz\u0131rl\u0131k hareketleri olmas\u0131 itibariyle, netice \u015fart\u0131 aranmayan somut bir tehlike su\u00e7udur. Su\u00e7un yap\u0131s\u0131 ve mahiyeti gere\u011fi kesintisiz devam eden, netice de\u011fil ve fakat fiiller, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerdir. Hatta bir anlamda devam eden durumdur. (F.Erem)<\/p>\n

M\u00fctemadi su\u00e7larda su\u00e7 tarihi, temadinin kesildi\u011fi tarihtir. Temadi; ya failin iradi fiiliyle ya da gayri iradi bir m\u00fcdahale ile fiilen, veya fail hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen iddianame ile dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi ile hukuken sona erer. Failin bu su\u00e7 nedeniyle tutuklanmaya evrilen yakalanmas\u0131, tutuklanmas\u0131 ya da hakk\u0131nda verilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015flanmas\u0131 fiili\/hukuki kesinti, iddianame ve mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ise hukuki kesinti olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u015eu hale g\u00f6re, failin tutuklanmaya evrilen yakalanmas\u0131ndan\/tutuklanmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce ya da sonra, devlet otoritesinin faile bir ihtar\u0131 ve mevcut durumun cemiyet taraf\u0131ndan tasvip olunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Ayhan \u00d6nder M\u00fctemadi Su\u00e7), su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etti\u011finin bildirilmesi anlam\u0131na gelen iddianame tarihine kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerinin, m\u00fctemadi su\u00e7lar\u0131n tekli\u011fi ve su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle tek bir \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.
\nSomut olayda; silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onanan Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165-2013\/414 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda su\u00e7 tarihinin 28.03.2011, iddianame tarihinin ise 12.04.2013, yine silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onanan Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda ise 08.12.2011, iddianame tarihinin 21.02.2012 oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu dosyada 09.12.2011 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, 10.12.2011 tarihinde ise tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki kesintinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 davaya dayanak te\u015fkil eden 21.02.2012 tarihli iddianame tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin tek su\u00e7 olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7: A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun 308. maddesinin, 6352 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 99. maddesi ile eklenen 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n

IV-)Karar<\/p>\n

A- )Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n

B-) Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228- 2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONAMA karar\u0131n\u0131n CMK’n\u0131n 308\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n

C-)San\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki kesintinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 davaya dayanak te\u015fkil eden 21.02.2012 tarihli ilk iddianame tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin iddianame kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re tek su\u00e7 olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek;<\/p>\n

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 5\/1, 53, 58\/9, 63\/1 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kesinle\u015fti\u011finin; yine san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165-2013\/414 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onanarak kesinle\u015fti\u011finin; anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; an\u0131lan her iki dosya birle\u015ftirilip, iddianamelerin kapsam\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmu\u015f ise Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2013\/165-2013\/414 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden CMK’n\u0131n 223\/7 maddesi gere\u011fince davan\u0131n reddine, aksi halde kurulacak h\u00fck\u00fcmle verilecek hapis cezas\u0131ndan, ayn\u0131 tek su\u00e7 nedeniyle daha \u00f6nce verilip kesinle\u015fen cezan\u0131n mahsubuna karar verilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,
\nBozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u00f6ncelikle bu sebepten dolay\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 302\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 05.04.2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

—<\/p>\n

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

16. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n

2020\/6232 E., 2021\/2524 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

\u0130tiraz Eden : Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131
\nSu\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma<\/p>\n

Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

I-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ KONUSU:<\/p>\n

San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulan her iki su\u00e7un temadi eden su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fiili kesintinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09.12.2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinin tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, her iki dosyan\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.09.2020 tarih ve KD – 2020\/83719 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarihli ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASI talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

II-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ NEDENLER\u0130:<\/p>\n

Mezkur ilama Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24\/09\/2020 tarih ve KD -2020\/83719 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile;
\n\u201c San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25\/12\/2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/3 ve 220\/6 maddeleri delaletiyle 314\/2 maddesi uyar\u0131nca neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16.Ceza Dairesi’nin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228 Esas- 2016\/5545 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyadaki su\u00e7 tarihinin 28\/03\/2011, iddianame tarihinin ise 12\/04\/2013 oldu\u011fu, bu dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda yakalanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 12\/12\/2012 tarihinde talimatla C. Savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ifadesinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45 Esas- 2013\/80 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi’nin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698 Esas- 2014\/2644 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyadaki su\u00e7 tarihinin 08\/12\/2011, iddianame tarihinin 21\/02\/2012 oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu dosyada 09\/12\/2011 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, 10\/12\/2011 tarihinde ise tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n

Anla\u015f\u0131lmakla;<\/p>\n

Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7lar\u0131 temadi eden su\u00e7lardan olup temadi, fiili veya hukuki kesinti ile sona ermektedir. San\u0131k … 28\/03\/2011 tarihinde ilk eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f ancak bu eylemi fiili veya hukuki kesintiye u\u011framadan bu kez 08\/12\/2011 tarihinde ikinci fiilini i\u015flemi\u015f bu fiilinden dolay\u0131 09\/12\/2011 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve akabinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015f, fiili kesinti bu \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f ve temadi sona ermi\u015ftir. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09\/12\/2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemleri tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere san\u0131k her iki eyleminden dolay\u0131 ayr\u0131 yerlerde yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f, ayr\u0131 cezalar alm\u0131\u015f ve bu cezalar Yarg\u0131tay’ca da onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Oysa bu dosyalar\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bahse konu hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n giderilebilmesi amac\u0131yla her iki dosyan\u0131n da Yarg\u0131tay’ca bozularak, dosyalar\u0131n mahallinde birle\u015ftirilmesini teminen CMK’n\u0131n 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca itiraz yoluna gidilmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.\u201d \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7e ile karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in itiraz isteminde bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

III-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ DE\u011eERLEND\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130:<\/p>\n

Ani su\u00e7 olarak i\u015flenmesi kural olarak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, zorunlu m\u00fctemadi su\u00e7lardand\u0131r. M\u00fctemadi su\u00e7, su\u00e7un tamamlanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen failin su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle neticenin devam etti\u011fi su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. Ba\u015fka bir ifade ile bu su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcnde hem maddi hem de manevi unsur temadi eder. TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7u, esas itibariyle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lan haz\u0131rl\u0131k hareketleri olmas\u0131 itibariyle, netice \u015fart\u0131 aranmayan somut bir tehlike su\u00e7udur. Su\u00e7un yap\u0131s\u0131 ve mahiyeti gere\u011fi kesintisiz devam eden, netice de\u011fil ve fakat fiiller, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerdir. Hatta bir anlamda devam eden durumdur. (F.Erem)<\/p>\n

M\u00fctemadi su\u00e7larda su\u00e7 tarihi, temadinin kesildi\u011fi tarihtir. Temadi; ya failin iradi fiiliyle ya da gayri iradi bir m\u00fcdahale ile fiilen, veya fail hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen iddianame ile dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi ile hukuken sona erer. Failin bu su\u00e7 nedeniyle tutuklanmaya evrilen yakalanmas\u0131, tutuklanmas\u0131 ya da hakk\u0131nda verilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015flanmas\u0131 fiili\/hukuki kesinti, iddianame ve mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc ise hukuki kesinti olu\u015fturacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u015eu hale g\u00f6re, failin tutuklanmaya evrilen yakalanmas\u0131ndan\/tutuklanmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nce ya da sonra, devlet otoritesinin faile bir ihtar\u0131 ve mevcut durumun cemiyet taraf\u0131ndan tasvip olunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (Ayhan \u00d6nder M\u00fctemadi Su\u00e7), su\u00e7 te\u015fkil etti\u011finin bildirilmesi anlam\u0131na gelen iddianame tarihine kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerinin, m\u00fctemadi su\u00e7lar\u0131n tekli\u011fi ve su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131n\u0131n devam etmesi nedeniyle tek bir \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.
\nSomut olayda; silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7undan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onanan Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165-2013\/414 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda su\u00e7 tarihinin 28.03.2011, iddianame tarihinin ise 12.04.2013, yine silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onanan Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda ise 08.12.2011, iddianame tarihinin 21.02.2012 oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu dosyada 09.12.2011 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, 10.12.2011 tarihinde ise tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki kesintinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 davaya dayanak te\u015fkil eden 21.02.2012 tarihli iddianame tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin tek su\u00e7 olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n

Sonu\u00e7: A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun 308. maddesinin, 6352 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 99. maddesi ile eklenen 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince yap\u0131lan incelemede;<\/p>\n

IV-)Karar<\/p>\n

A- )Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n

B-) Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi’nin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 ONAMA karar\u0131n\u0131n CMK’n\u0131n 308\/3. maddesi uyar\u0131nca KALDIRILMASINA,<\/p>\n

C-)San\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki kesintinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 davaya dayanak te\u015fkil eden 21.02.2012 tarihli ilk iddianame tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi \u00f6rg\u00fctsel faaliyetlerin iddianame kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re tek su\u00e7 olu\u015fturabilece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilerek;
\nSan\u0131\u011f\u0131n silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan TCK’n\u0131n 314\/2, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 5\/1, 53, 58\/9, 63\/1 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kesinle\u015fti\u011finin; yine san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131yla mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165-2013\/414 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onanarak kesinle\u015fti\u011finin; anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; an\u0131lan her iki dosya birle\u015ftirilip, iddianamelerin kapsam\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilerek \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmu\u015f ise silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin olarak Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 2013\/165-2013\/414 say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davan\u0131n CMK’n\u0131n 223\/7 maddesi gere\u011fince reddine, aksi halde kurulacak h\u00fck\u00fcmle verilecek hapis cezas\u0131ndan, ayn\u0131 tek su\u00e7 nedeniyle daha \u00f6nce verilip kesinle\u015fen cezan\u0131n mahsubuna karar verilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,
\nBozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn \u00f6ncelikle bu sebepten dolay\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 302\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, 05.04.2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 05.04.2021 tarihli, 2020\/6231 E., 2021\/2523 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 2020\/6232 E., 2021\/2524 K. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/6231 E., 2021\/2523 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Su\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ KONUSU: San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulan her iki su\u00e7un temadi eden su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fiili kesintinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09.12.2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinin tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, her iki dosyan\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.09.2020 tarih ve KD – 2020\/66549 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarihli ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-87534","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/6231 E., 2021\/2523 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Su\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ KONUSU: San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulan her iki su\u00e7un temadi eden su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fiili kesintinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09.12.2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinin tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, her iki dosyan\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.09.2020 tarih ve KD – 2020\/66549 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarihli ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-15T15:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-15T15:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\"},\"wordCount\":3111,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-15T15:00:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi 2020\/6231 E., 2021\/2523 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Su\u00e7 : Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleme Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I-)\u0130T\u0130RAZ KONUSU: San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 25.12.2013 tarih ve 2013\/165 Esas- 2013\/414 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “\u00d6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015flemek” su\u00e7undan neticeten 3 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarih ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla d\u00fczeltilerek onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ayr\u0131ca Malatya 3. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 30.05.2013 tarih ve 2012\/45-2013\/80 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla “Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak” su\u00e7undan neticeten 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n ise Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesinin 13.03.2014 tarih ve 2013\/16698-2014\/2644 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla onand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulan her iki su\u00e7un temadi eden su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu, fiili kesintinin olu\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle temadinin sona erdi\u011fi 09.12.2011 tarihine kadar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinin tek bir su\u00e7u olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131, her iki dosyan\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda birle\u015ftirilmesi, delillerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7tan bir kez cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken m\u00fckerrer olarak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 24.09.2020 tarih ve KD – 2020\/66549 say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 31.10.2016 tarihli ve 2015\/8228-2016\/5545 say\u0131l\u0131 …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-15T15:00:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"15 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-15T15:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/"},"wordCount":3111,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-15T15:00:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-ceza-dairesinin-2020-6231-e-ile-2020-6232-e-sayili-kararlari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2020\/6231 E. ile 2020\/6232 E. say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87534","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87534"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87534\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87534"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87534"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87534"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}