T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
HASAN \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/5438)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 21\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/5\/2025 – 32892<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mehmet Alaattin ASLAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olaya ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 16\/6\/2020 tarihinde telefonla aranarak davet edildi\u011fi polis merkezinde hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmekte olan bir soru\u015fturma nedeniyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir gece g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucu, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131yla adli kontrol \u015fart\u0131yla serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ya da hukuki yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararland\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcdafi ba\u015fvurucunun sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi \u00f6n\u00fcnde verdi\u011fi ifade s\u0131ras\u0131nda herhangi bir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131nda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan tutanak tutulmu\u015ftur. 16\/6\/2020 tarihli bu tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re bir su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucuyla telefonla ileti\u015fim kurulmu\u015f, polis merkezi \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen ba\u015fvurucuya durum anlat\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve genel bilgi toplama sorgusu yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra doktor raporual\u0131narak gerekli i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucu, polis merkezine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu 18\/6\/2020 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc iddias\u0131yla Gaziantep Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fik\u00e2yetinde 16\/6\/2020 tarihinde telefonla davet edilmesi \u00fczerine saat 19.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda gitti\u011fi polis merkezinde avukat\u0131 gelmeden \u00f6nce ifade alma odas\u0131nda biri sivil giyimli, di\u011feri \u00fcniformal\u0131 iki polisin tekme, tokat at\u0131p ayaklar\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131na sopayla vurmak \u015feklinde fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, toplu nezarethanede \u00e7\u0131plak ayakla b\u0131rak\u0131larak yerdeki su birikintisine oturtuldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, takip eden g\u00fcn olan 17\/6\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011fleden \u00f6nce karakol amirinin odas\u0131nda bir ba\u015fka polisin daha kendisine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, saat 17.45’te al\u0131nan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunu g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hastanedeki doktorun muayene etmeksizin darp ve cebir izi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde yazarak d\u00fczenledi\u011fini, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131yla serbest kald\u0131ktan hemen sonra gitti\u011fi ayn\u0131 hastanede ba\u015fka bir doktor taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan muayenesi sonucu saat 21.04’te kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nan raporda u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 fiziksel \u015fiddetin emarelerine yer verildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f; k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulundu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin e\u015fk\u00e2lini payla\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kendisine k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunan kolluk personeli ile onu muayene etmeden, ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak rapor d\u00fczenleyen doktordan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. 17\/6\/2020 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 17.54’te 25 Aral\u0131k Devlet Hastanesinde g\u00f6revli bir doktorca d\u00fczenlenen adli rapor formunda darp ve cebir izinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Ayn\u0131 hastanede g\u00f6revli bir ba\u015fka doktorca saat 21.04’te d\u00fczenlenen adli rapor formunda “..Sol baca\u011f\u0131nda \u015fi\u015flik, sa\u011f ayak alt\u0131nda morluk mevcut. Burun \u00fczerinde \u015fi\u015flik ve k\u0131zar\u0131kl\u0131k mevcut. Boyun alt\u0131nda \u00e7izik mevcut. Sol kolunda \u00e7izikler mevcut. BTM [basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale] ile giderilebilir. Hayati tehlikesi yoktur.” tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Konuyla ilgili soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k; \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131 ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin belgeler ile ilgili polis merkezi ve hastaneye ili\u015fkin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin teminini, ba\u015fvurucuya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulundu\u011fu iddia edilen polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kimliklerinin tespitini ve ilk sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunu d\u00fczenleyen doktorun ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Kolluk taraf\u0131ndan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere cevab\u0131nda, olay tarihinde polis merkezinde kamera kayd\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hastanenin kamera sisteminin geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck olarak ancak altm\u0131\u015f g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle veri kaydetti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclere ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 17\/6\/2020 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 17.54’te d\u00fczenlen, darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisini i\u00e7eren raporu haz\u0131rlayan doktorun 21\/11\/2020 tarihinde kollukta verdi\u011fi ifadesinde; ak\u015fam saatlerinde polis e\u015fli\u011finde acil servise gelen ba\u015fvurucuya \u015fiddet uygulan\u0131p uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir darp izi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sordu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun olumsuz yan\u0131t vermesi \u00fczerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kontrolde de \u015fiddet izine rastlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in raporu ger\u00e7e\u011fe uygun olarak d\u00fczenledi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucu herhangi bir fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011framad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi i\u00e7in detayl\u0131 \u015fekilde muayene etme ihtiyac\u0131 duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu muayeneden sonra ba\u015f\u0131na bir \u015fey gelmi\u015f olabilece\u011fini dile getirdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 7\/12\/2020 tarihinde \u015fik\u00e2yetin 2\/12\/1999 tarihli ve 4483 say\u0131l\u0131 Memurlar ve Di\u011fer Kamu G\u00f6revlilerinin Yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131ndaki Kanun’un 4. maddesinin son f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca i\u015fleme konulmayarak soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar gerek\u00e7esinde olaya ili\u015fkin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, darp ve cebir izi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitini i\u00e7eren raporu veren doktorun at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fini, ilk sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu ile ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi ekinde sundu\u011fu sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu aras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 saat s\u00fcre oldu\u011funu ve ba\u015fvurucunun sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi \u00f6n\u00fcnde de i\u015fkence iddias\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun, kesin nitelikte olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen an\u0131lan karara yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fince de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve 4\/6\/2021 tarihinde yine kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n verdi\u011fi soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 24\/12\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 21\/1\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndayken k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tutuklanma tehdidi alt\u0131nda olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ve yine ayn\u0131 kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin eline d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fi endi\u015fesiyle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleyi yetkili makamlar \u00f6n\u00fcnde dile getiremedi\u011fini, serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yeti hakk\u0131nda ise i\u015fleme konulmama karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine bilgi ve belgeler toplayarak \u015fikayete konu iddialar hakk\u0131nda iddialar\u0131n ciddi bulgu ve belgelere dayanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015fleme konulmama karar\u0131 verdi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesindeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bir kimsenin devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin 17. maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddiada bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131; ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli; soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S.D.,B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
16. Olay sonras\u0131 ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015f, olaya ili\u015fkin kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin temini i\u00e7in \u00e7aba g\u00f6stermi\u015f, muayene i\u015flemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeksizin sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu d\u00fczenledi\u011fi iddia edilen doktorun ifadesini soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131na kazand\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutuldu\u011fu polis merkezinde \u00f6nce iki polisin kendisini tekme ve tokat atarak darbetti\u011fini, sonras\u0131nda bu polis memurlar\u0131ndan birinin ayaklar\u0131na sopa ile vurdu\u011funu, takip eden g\u00fcn de bir polis memurunun fiziksel \u015fiddetine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucunun ilk al\u0131nan sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunda bu fiziksel \u015fiddete ili\u015fkin bir tespit yer almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ba\u015fvurucu ya da m\u00fcdafii de ba\u015fvurucu serbest kalana kadar bu fiziksel \u015fiddetten bahsetmemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu hususa gerek\u00e7e olarak tutuklanma tehdidi alt\u0131nda olmas\u0131n\u0131, kollu\u011fun fiziksel \u015fiddetine tekrar u\u011framaktan korkmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa verdi\u011fi \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde de yer vermedi\u011fi bu sebebi ilk olarak Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine verdi\u011fi itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde dile getirdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
18. Soru\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k \u00f6zellikle ilk sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu ile ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi ekinde sundu\u011fu sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu aras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 saat s\u00fcre oldu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi \u00f6n\u00fcnde i\u015fkence iddias\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde durmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu ise gerek sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itirazda gerekse bireysel ba\u015fvurusunda birinci rapor ile ikinci rapor aras\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7 saat olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f raporu al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra adliyeye mevcutlu olarak g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, tutuklanma talebiyle sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine sevk edildi\u011fini ve burada sorgusunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucunun sonucu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki bu iddias\u0131n\u0131n ise itiraz mercii olan sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fince dikkate al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
19. Di\u011fer taraftan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esinde yer verdi\u011fi bilgiler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u015f\u00fcpheli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kimliklerini tespit etmek suretiyle ifadelerini almayarak sonuca gitti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Bunun yan\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a verilen karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz yolu kapal\u0131 tutuldu\u011fundan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00e2lihaz\u0131rda verdi\u011fi bu karar\u0131n genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik talebin bir itiraz mercii taraf\u0131ndan incelenmesine de engel olacak mahiyette oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekilmelidir.<\/p>\n
21. Soru\u015fturmadaki eksiklikler k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia hakk\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n vermedi\u011fi i\u00e7in bu a\u015famada k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 150.000 TL maddi tazminat ile 150.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi soru\u015fturma makam\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131pAnayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek soru\u015fturma sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
25. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin soru\u015fturman\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup \u015f\u00fcpheli ki\u015fi veya ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, soru\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak soru\u015fturma sonunda da delillerin soru\u015fturma ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili soru\u015fturma makam\u0131na aittir.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 115.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucu, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan maddi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinde koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Gaziantep Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Sor. No: 2020\/38908) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 115.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 21\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 21\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/5438 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HASAN \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/5438) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 21\/1\/2025 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 6\/5\/2025 – 32892 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Hasan \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Vekili : Av. Mehmet Alaattin ASLAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olaya ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 16\/6\/2020 tarihinde telefonla aranarak davet edildi\u011fi polis merkezinde hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmekte olan bir soru\u015fturma nedeniyle g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bir gece g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucu, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finin karar\u0131yla adli kontrol \u015fart\u0131yla serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ya da hukuki yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararland\u0131\u011f\u0131 m\u00fcdafi ba\u015fvurucunun sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi \u00f6n\u00fcnde verdi\u011fi ifade s\u0131ras\u0131nda herhangi bir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddias\u0131nda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan tutanak tutulmu\u015ftur. 16\/6\/2020 tarihli bu tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re bir su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucuyla telefonla ileti\u015fim kurulmu\u015f, polis merkezi \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen ba\u015fvurucuya durum anlat\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve genel bilgi toplama sorgusu yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra doktor raporual\u0131narak gerekli i\u015flemlerin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucu, polis merkezine …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n