{"id":73497,"date":"2025-05-02T10:54:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-02T07:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-02T10:54:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-02T07:54:00","slug":"aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"AYM’nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n

ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

TAYYAR ERO\u011eLU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n

(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2014\/5921)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025<\/p>\n

B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

KARAR<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n

\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n

Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

H\u00fcseyin Ozan ADIYAMAN<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

1. Tayyar ERO\u011eLU<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

2. Zeliha BULUT<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

3. Resmiye VATANSEVER<\/p>\n

Vekili<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Av. Ercan KANAR<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

4. Naki DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n

Vekili<\/p>\n

:<\/p>\n

Av. Eylem HAKVERD\u0130 DUYAR<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n

1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza davas\u0131nda yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuru ayr\u0131ca tutuklama tedbirinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, tahliye umudu olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilme nedeniyle insan haysiyeti ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayan ceza yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin di\u011fer baz\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n

2. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Resmiye Vatansever ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun m\u00fcdafiileri taraf\u0131ndan 30\/4\/2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir’in m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan 18\/8\/2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru 2014\/13817 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131na kaydedilmi\u015ftir. 2014\/13817 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvuru, incelenen ba\u015fvuruyla birle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n

4. Ba\u015fvuru formu ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

A. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Yakalanmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Tespitler <\/p>\n

5. \u0130stihbari \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar sonucunda 16\/5\/2006 tarihinde, TKP-ML KONFERANS (T\u0130KKO) ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn y\u00f6netiminde yer al\u0131p genel sekreterlik g\u00f6revini y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011ferlendirilen H.\u015e. ve C.K. yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. H.\u015e. ve C.K.n\u0131n ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilen ikametg\u00e2hta yap\u0131lan aramada di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcphelilerle birlikte ba\u015fvurucular Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Naki Demir de yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yakaland\u0131klar\u0131 s\u0131rada E.E. ve Y.Y. ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f sahte kimlikleri kulland\u0131klar\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever de ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn pazar yerinde al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada F.E. ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f sahte kimlikle, ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut 3\/8\/2006 tarihinde Cide’de S.C. ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f sahte kimlikle yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

6. Ba\u015fvurucular Naki Demir ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever’in ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilen ikametg\u00e2hta yap\u0131lan aramada uzun namlulu silahlar, patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddeler ve \u00f6rg\u00fctsel malzemeler ele ge\u00e7irilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

B. Ba\u015fvurucular Hakk\u0131nda D\u00fczenlenen \u0130ddianamelerdeki De\u011ferlendirmeler<\/p>\n

7. Ba\u015fvurucular ve di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun m\u00fclga 250. maddesi ile yetkili Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda farkl\u0131 illerdeki Cumuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmalar da yetkisizlik kararlar\u0131 ile Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 6\/10\/2006 tarihinde di\u011fer \u015f\u00fcphelilerle birlikte ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131’n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, nitelikli ya\u011fma, tehlikeli maddelerin izinsiz olarak bulundurulmas\u0131 veya el de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma, ate\u015fli silah ve mermileri ruhsats\u0131z olarak bulundurma ve resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 talebiyle iddianame d\u00fczenlemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

9. \u0130ddianamede ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir’in Muharrem kod ad\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, 16\/10\/2001 tarihinde meydana gelen ve iki askerin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, roketatarla yap\u0131lan sald\u0131r\u0131ya i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

10. Ayn\u0131 iddianamede ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever’in de 3\/1\/2006 tarihinde Z.S.nin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 minib\u00fcs\u00fcn zorla al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve Sorgun’daki bir kuyumcuda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ya\u011fmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs eylemlerine i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun ise 11\/5\/2006 tarihinde Ordu’daki Milliyet\u00e7i Hareket Partisi (MHP) il binas\u0131 ve \u00dclk\u00fc Ocaklar\u0131 Dergisi temsilcili\u011fine bomba d\u00fczenekleri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve patlat\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

11. \u0130ddianamede ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular Naki Demir, Resmiye Vatansever ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun 11\/4\/2005 tarihinde kire\u00e7 fabrikas\u0131n\u0131n deposunda patlay\u0131c\u0131 madde aranmas\u0131 ve fabrikada \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan bek\u00e7inin tabancas\u0131n\u0131n ve cep telefonunun silah kullan\u0131larak zorla al\u0131nmas\u0131; 21\/2\/2006 tarihinde Adalet ve Kalk\u0131nma Partisi Belde Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 B\u00fcrosu giri\u015fine zaman ayarl\u0131 ve par\u00e7a tesirli el bombas\u0131 konulup patlat\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemlerine i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

12. Ayr\u0131ca iddianamede Bahar, Nergiz ve Kezban kod adlar\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanan ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un 17\/5\/2003 tarihinde Eym\u00fcr k\u00f6y\u00fcnde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 ve ya\u011fma ile 15\/10\/1998 tarihinde meydana gelen role istasyonuna sald\u0131r\u0131 eylemlerine i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Buna ek olarak 14\/8\/1997 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen odun deposunun yak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ya\u011fmalanmas\u0131, 20\/5\/2003 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ya\u011fma, 16\/6\/1994, 18\/6\/2002 ve 20-23\/9\/2002 tarihlerinde meydana gelen g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri ile silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma eylemlerine i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

13. \u00d6te yandan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n 22\/11\/2006 tarihli ikinci iddianamesiyle ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever’in T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131’n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, nitelikli ya\u011fma, silahla kasten yaralama, silahla tehdit, silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma ve ate\u015fli silah ve mermileri ruhsats\u0131z olarak bulundurma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir. Resmiye Vatansever’in 27\/2\/2006 tarihinde m\u00fc\u015fteki R.A.ya ait minib\u00fcs\u00fc silah zoruyla alma, silahla kasten yaralama, kendilerini takip eden polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131 uzun namlulu silahla tehdit etme eylemlerine i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi de iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

C. Kovu\u015fturma Evresi<\/p>\n

14. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddianamelerin kabul\u00fcyle a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un m\u00fclga 250. maddesi ile yetkili Ankara 11. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi) g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

1. Tan\u0131klar\u0131n Beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n Tespiti \u0130\u00e7in Yap\u0131lan \u0130\u015flemler <\/p>\n

15. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 18\/10\/2006 tarihli tensip zapt\u0131 ile ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

a. Savunman\u0131n Talepleri<\/p>\n

16. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 13\/12\/2006 tarihli ilk celsesinde ba\u015fvurucular Resmiye Vatansever, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Zeliha Bulut m\u00fcdafii ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n iddia ve savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu duru\u015fmada dinlenmesini istemi\u015ftir. Aksi uygulaman\u0131n tan\u0131\u011fa soru sorma hakk\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan m\u00fcdafii, tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla de\u011fil duru\u015fmada bizzat mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan dinlenmesini talep etmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan talep A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bundan sonraki celselerde de taleplerini yineleyen ba\u015fvurucular m\u00fcdafii ayr\u0131ca istinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n tebli\u011f edilmemesinden ve bu duru\u015fmalarda usul\u00fc hatalar yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama boyunca devam eden bu husustaki talepleri ayr\u0131ca bir gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeksizin reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

17. Ba\u015fvurucular m\u00fcdafii A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine sundu\u011fu 9\/2\/2007 tarihli dilek\u00e7ede; soru\u015fturma evresinde tan\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurlara yapt\u0131r\u0131lan te\u015fhislerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tek tek g\u00f6sterilerek te\u015fhis ettirildi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n te\u015fhislerinin usul kurallar\u0131na uygun \u015fekilde, yarg\u0131land\u0131klar\u0131 mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucular m\u00fcdafii 6\/4\/2007 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde ise 9\/2\/2007 tarihli taleplerini tekrarlayarak m\u00fcdafilerin baz\u0131 istinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131na, duru\u015fman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinden sonra \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015f; A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ad\u0131na tan\u0131k dinleyecek yarg\u0131 merciine g\u00f6nderilen tek bir foto\u011fraf \u00fczerinden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen te\u015fhis i\u015fleminin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

18. Ba\u015fvurucular m\u00fcdafii “tevsi-i tahkikat talepleri hakk\u0131nda” konulu 3\/3\/2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde de \u00f6rnekler vererek istinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131nda usuli hatalar yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve te\u015fhis i\u015flemlerinin g\u00fcvenilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Savunma makam\u0131n\u0131n kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kat\u0131lsa bile tespit edilen beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc istinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131nda dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan dinlenmesi ve te\u015fhis i\u015fleminin duru\u015fmada yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi savunman\u0131n tevsi-i tahkikat talepleri hakk\u0131nda daha \u00f6nce karar verildi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular m\u00fcdafii esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 13\/11\/2012 tarihli yaz\u0131l\u0131 savunmas\u0131nda da benzer taleplerini tekrar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

b. \u0130stinabe Mahkemelerinde Beyanlar\u0131 Tespit Edilen Baz\u0131 Tan\u0131klar<\/p>\n

19. 11\/5\/2006 tarihinde Ordu’daki MHP il binas\u0131 ve \u00dclk\u00fc Ocaklar\u0131 Dergi Temsilcili\u011fine bomba d\u00fczenekleri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve patlat\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemleriyle ilgili olarak tan\u0131k T.U.nun beyan\u0131n\u0131n istinabe yoluyla al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. T.U. olay tarihinde Ordu MHP \u0130l Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bek\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktad\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma evresinde tan\u0131k, bombay\u0131 b\u0131rakan ki\u015fi ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ona sorular sordu\u011funu ve durumdan \u015f\u00fcphelenerek onu yakalamak istemedi\u011fini ama \u015f\u00fcphelinin ka\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. 19\/5\/2006 tarihli Canl\u0131 Te\u015fhis Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re T.U. aralar\u0131nda di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu be\u015f ki\u015fi aras\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nu te\u015fhis etmi\u015ftir. Ordu A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 25\/6\/2008 tarihli istinabe duru\u015fmas\u0131nda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesini alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tan\u0131k bu duru\u015fmada, ba\u015fvurucu ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131nda ba\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fapkay\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc net olarak hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki te\u015fhisin kesin oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmada g\u00f6sterilen foto\u011fraf\u0131ndaki ki\u015fiyi tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015finin merdivenlerde kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ki\u015fi oldu\u011funu, te\u015fhisinin kesin ve do\u011fru oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii bu duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmu\u015f ve tan\u0131\u011fa soru sorabilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

20. Ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen, 14\/8\/1997 tarihinde Tekmezar odun deposunda meydana gelen ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma ve ya\u011fma eylemleriyle ilgili olarak istinabe yoluyla tan\u0131klar M.E., H.M.A., A.A., H.E., S.A., Me.S., Ma.S.nin ifadeleri Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru formunun eklerinde ve gerek\u00e7eli kararda an\u0131lan tan\u0131klar\u0131n soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyanlar\u0131 ya da te\u015fhislerine ili\u015fkin bir belge ya da a\u00e7\u0131klama bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi huzurundaki beyan\u0131nda tan\u0131k M.E., Zeliha Bulut’un foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi \u00fczerine aradan on y\u0131l ge\u00e7ti\u011fi i\u00e7in kendisine doktor diye hitap edilen kad\u0131n\u0131n foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015fi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyemeyece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k H.M.A. foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin olay tarihinde kendisiyle ilgilenen kad\u0131na benzedi\u011fini ancak aradan zaman ge\u00e7mesi nedeniyle bundan emin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131klar H.E. ve S.A. ise foto\u011fraftakinin kendilerine konu\u015fma yapan ki\u015fiye benzedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte tan\u0131klar Ma.S. ve A.A. foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin kendileriyle konu\u015fma yapan ki\u015fiye benzemedi\u011fini, Me.S. ise foto\u011fraftakinin kendileriyle konu\u015fan ki\u015fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii bu duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmu\u015f ve tan\u0131klara soru sorabilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

21. Yine ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen, 20\/5\/2003 tarihinde cep telefonunun zorla al\u0131nmas\u0131 eylemiyle ilgili olarak ma\u011fdur O.A. soru\u015fturma evresindeki beyan\u0131nda \u00f6zetle in\u015faatta \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada biri kad\u0131n d\u00f6rt ki\u015finin yan\u0131na gelip cep telefonunu zorla ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015f; beyan\u0131nda, foto\u011fraf \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 te\u015fhisle telefonunu alan ki\u015fileri M. kod adl\u0131 C.G., S. kod adl\u0131 H.Y., H. kod adl\u0131 S.O. ve K. kod adl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olarak te\u015fhis etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Kovu\u015fturma evresinde ma\u011fdur O.A.n\u0131n ifadesi istinabe yoluyla Re\u015fadiye Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ma\u011fdur O.A. kendisine g\u00f6sterilen foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin (Zeliha Bulut) olay yerinde g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kad\u0131n oldu\u011funu sand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, net olarak hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nceki te\u015fhisinde de net olarak hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

2. DNA Analizine \u0130li\u015fkin Raporlar<\/p>\n

22. Resmiye Vatansever’in kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen, 27\/2\/2006 tarihinde R.A.ya ait minib\u00fcs\u00fc silah zoruyla alma, silahla kasten yaralama ve polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131 silahla tehdit etme eylemleriyle ilgili DNA analizine ili\u015fkin olarak 31\/3\/2006, 7\/4\/2006 ve 25\/8\/2006tarihli ekspertiz raporlar\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Ekspertiz raporlar\u0131nda olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ara\u00e7 i\u00e7inden DNA incelemesine uygun bir adet kan \u00f6rne\u011fi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6rne\u011fin di\u011fer san\u0131k C.K.n\u0131n DNA’s\u0131yla uyumlu oldu\u011fu tespiti yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

3. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Sorumlu Tutuldu\u011fu Eylemler ve Haklar\u0131nda Kurulan H\u00fck\u00fcm<\/p>\n

23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 13\/11\/2012 tarihli yirmi yedinci celsede ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 17\/5\/2003, 15\/10\/1998, 14\/8\/1997, 20\/5\/2003, 16\/6\/1994 ile 18\/6\/2002 tarihli ve 2002 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131ndaki eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan 1\/3\/1926 tarihli ve 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 146. maddesinin (1) No.lu f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

24. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 16\/5\/2006 ve 11\/5\/2006 tarihli eylemlerden dolay\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun, 16\/5\/2006, 3\/1\/2006 ve 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eylemlerden dolay\u0131 ise ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever’in anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan 26\/9\/2004 tarihli ve 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 309. maddesinin (1) No.lu f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyetine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Resmiye Vatansever’in 3\/1\/2006 ve 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan iki kez 18 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

25. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 6\/10\/2001, 11\/4\/2005 ve 21\/2\/2006 tarihli eylemlerden sorumlu tutulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir’in eyleminin silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirerek 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 314. maddesinin (2) No.lu f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re 12 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyetine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

26. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucular Resmiye Vatansever, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Naki Demir’in kald\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilen ikametg\u00e2hta yap\u0131lan 16\/5\/2006 tarihli aramada ele ge\u00e7irilen bir M-16, Kala\u015fnikof marka iki silah ve iki tabancay\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek vahim nitelikte silah bulundurma su\u00e7undan 10 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis ve 675 TL adli para cezas\u0131, 1.540 gram TNT, 380 gram dinamit lokumu, d\u00f6rt el bombas\u0131, 37 elektrikli kaps\u00fcl, bomba d\u00fczene\u011fi, 5 kg amonyum nitrat\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek tehlikeli maddelerin izinsiz olarak bulundurulmas\u0131 su\u00e7undan 8 y\u0131l 4 ay hapis ve 33.320 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

27. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi son olarak sahte kimlik belgesi kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi ba\u015fvurucular Resmiye Vatansever, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Naki Demir’in resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7undan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 3 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

4. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin Ba\u015fvurucular Hakk\u0131ndaki Kabul\u00fc ve De\u011ferlendirmeleri<\/p>\n

28. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; ba\u015fvurucular Tayyar Ero\u011flu, Remiye Vatansever ve Naki Demir hakk\u0131nda yakaland\u0131klar\u0131 ikametg\u00e2hta ele ge\u00e7irilen vahim nitelikteki silahlar ile patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddeleri bulundurma ve sahte kimlik belgesi ta\u015f\u0131ma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, arama ve elkoyma tutanaklar\u0131 ile ekspertiz raporlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131na dayanak alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu gerek\u00e7e ile Mahkeme, Naki Demir’in silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fini de kabul etmi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karardaki de\u011ferlendirmelerin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“16.5.2006 tarihinde TKP-ML KONFERANS (T\u0130KKO) ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc militan\u0131 ve \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn y\u00f6netiminde yer al\u0131p genel sekreterli\u011fi g\u00f6revini y\u00fcr\u00fcten […] Kod [H.\u015e.] ve […] Kod [C.K.nin] otob\u00fcs ile Kayseri iline gittiklerinin bilgisinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ni\u011fde-Kayseri Karayolu Edikli Kasabas\u0131 yol ayr\u0131m\u0131nda otob\u00fcste yap\u0131lan kimlik kontrol\u00fc sonucu [A.A.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile [H.\u015e.], [V.D.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile [C.K.] yakalanm\u0131\u015f bu iki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n oturduklar\u0131 tespit edilen Ni\u011fde ili Sel\u00e7uk Mahallesi [T.S. …] adresinde yap\u0131lan operasyonda [A.K.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile […] Kod [S.O.], [E.E.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile Sinan Kod Tayyar ERO\u011eLU [ba\u015fvurucu], [Y.Y.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile Muharrem Kod Naki DEM\u0130R [ba\u015fvurucu], [A.\u00d6.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile […] Kod [Y.\u0130.] ile [F.E.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile Resmiye VATANSEVER [ba\u015fvurucu] de pazar yerinde al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada yakalanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ni\u011fde ilindeki h\u00fccre evinde 16\/05\/2006 tarihli aramada 1540 gram TNT, 380 gram dinamit lokumu, 4 adet el bombas\u0131, 37 adet elektrikli kaps\u00fcl, bomba d\u00fczene\u011fi, 5 kg. amonyum nitrat ve ayr\u0131ca 1 adet M 16, 2 adet Kale\u015fnikof, 2 adet tabanca bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

29. Buna ek olarak A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvurucu Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun 11\/5\/2006 tarihinde Ordu’daki MHP il binas\u0131 ve \u00dclk\u00fc Ocaklar\u0131 Dergi Temsilcili\u011fine bomba d\u00fczenekleri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve patlat\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemlerine kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. Bu husustaki gerek\u00e7esinde Mahkeme, arama kapsam\u0131nda elde edilenlerle olayda kullan\u0131lan patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddelerin ayn\u0131 nitelikte olmas\u0131na ve Ordu MHP \u0130l Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bek\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan T.U.nun soru\u015fturma evresindeki canl\u0131 te\u015fhisine dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7eli karardaki de\u011ferlendirmelerin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“\u0130ddianamenin 15. sayfas\u0131nda 4 eylem isnat edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

(…)<\/p>\n

4-11\/05\/2006 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

San\u0131k Tayyar Ero\u011flu’na ili\u015fkin 11\/05\/2006 tarihinde Ordu ili MHP \u0130l Binas\u0131 ile \u00fclk\u00fc ocaklar\u0131 dergi temsilcili\u011fine bomba d\u00fczeneklerinin b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin Erzurum C.Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yetkisizlik karar\u0131 ve ekleri (iddianame, ifade tutanaklar\u0131, tutanaklar, ekspertiz raporlar\u0131, fezleke, canl\u0131 te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131, olay tutana\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki ifade tutanaklar\u0131, bilgilendirme tutanaklar\u0131)(KL.21)birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

Ni\u011fde ilinde yap\u0131lan operasyon ile TKP\/ ML-T\u0130KKO -KONFERANS ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye 7 \u015f\u00fcphelinin yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klara ait evlerde yap\u0131lan aramalarda ele ge\u00e7irilen bomba yap\u0131m\u0131nda kullan\u0131lan malzemeler ile Ordu’da meydana gelen patlamalarda kullan\u0131lan malzemelerin ayn\u0131 nitelikte oldu\u011fu ve ayr\u0131ca Ordu MHP \u0130l Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda g\u00f6revli bek\u00e7inin Ni\u011fde Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki canl\u0131 te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131nda binada meydana gelen patlama olay\u0131 \u00f6ncesinde \u015f\u00fcpheli tav\u0131rlar\u0131 ile dikkati \u00e7eken \u015fahs\u0131n Tayyar Ero\u011flu isimli san\u0131k oldu\u011funu te\u015fhis etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131k bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n

30. Ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever’in i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi kabul edilen ve 3\/1\/2006 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemle ilgili mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc canl\u0131 te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131 ile tan\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 27\/2\/2006 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen eylemle ilgili mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 ise genel olarak tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ve Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131n\u0131n 25\/8\/2006, 31\/3\/2006 ve 7\/4\/2006 tarihli DNA analizine ili\u015fkin ekspertiz raporlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak olu\u015fturulmu\u015ftur. Mahkemenin bu husustaki de\u011ferlendirmelerinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n

“\u0130ddianamenin 14. sayfas\u0131nda 4 eylem isnat edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

3-T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ni\u011fde ilindeki h\u00fccre evinde 16\/05\/2006 tarihli aramada 1540 gram TNT, 380 gram dinamit lokumu, 4 adet el bombas\u0131, 37 adet elektrikli kaps\u00fcl, bomba d\u00fczene\u011fi, 5 kg. amonyum nitrat ve ayr\u0131ca 1 adet M 16, 2 adet Kale\u015fnikof, 2 adet tabanca bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

4-03\/01\/2006 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

Sorgun Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 31\/07\/2006 tarih, 2006\/14 Hz. numaras\u0131 ile \u015f\u00fcphelileri [S.O., Y.\u0130.], m\u00fc\u015ftekileri [M.Y., \u0130.Y., M.E., Z.S.], su\u00e7u gasp, 6136 Say\u0131l\u0131 Yasaya Muhalefet, h\u00fcrriyeti tehdit, adam yaralama, Anayasal D\u00fczene ve bu d\u00fczenin i\u015fleyi\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi, su\u00e7 tarihi 03\/01\/2006, su\u00e7 yeri Sorgun olan g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 ve ekinde adli rapor, ekspertiz raporu, tan\u0131k ifade tutanaklar\u0131, bilgi alma tutanaklar\u0131, foto\u011fraf te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131, sorgu zab\u0131tlar\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli ifade tutanaklar\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki ifade tutanaklar\u0131, canl\u0131 te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131, olay ve yakalama tutanaklar\u0131, ev arama tutanaklar\u0131, fezleke, olay yeri inceleme raporu ve olay yeri krokisi(KL.11), Ni\u011fde Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan tanzim edilen te\u015fhis edenleri [A.A., \u0130.Y., M.E., H.B., Z.S.], te\u015fhis edilenleri [C.K., N.D., S.O., H.\u015e., T.E. ve Y.\u0130.] olan 19\/05\/2006 tarihli canl\u0131 te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131 (KL.1), m\u00fc\u015fteki [M.E., M.Y.], tan\u0131k [A.P., G.T.] ve ma\u011fdur [Ga.T.ye] ili\u015fkin ifade tutana\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rnekleri(KL.51)birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

03\/01\/2006 tarihinde [S.O., Y.\u0130.] ve Resmiye Vatansever’in Yozgat ilinde m\u00fc\u015fteki [Z.S.nin] kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 66 M [0…] plaka say\u0131l\u0131 minib\u00fcs\u00fc Alaca il\u00e7esine ba\u015fsa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na gitme bahanesiyle kiralad\u0131klar\u0131, yolda giderken san\u0131klar\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi silah ile etkisiz hale getirerek ellerini, ayaklar\u0131n\u0131 ve a\u011fz\u0131n\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131p minib\u00fcs\u00fcn arkas\u0131na att\u0131klar\u0131, minib\u00fcs ile Sorgun il\u00e7esinde PTT caddesinde [Y.] Kuyumculuk isimli m\u00fc\u015fteki [\u0130. ve M.Y.nin] bulundu\u011fu i\u015f yerine geldikleri, san\u0131klar\u0131n ellerinde tabanca ve uzun namlulu silahlarla kuyumcuyu soymaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, bu s\u0131rada d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan ge\u00e7mekte olan m\u00fc\u015fteki [M.E.yi] d\u0131\u015far\u0131da g\u00f6zc\u00fc olarak bekleyen san\u0131k kimli\u011fi belirsiz kad\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eriye soktu\u011fu, san\u0131klar\u0131n kasay\u0131 a\u00e7maya \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, ba\u015faramay\u0131nca ate\u015f ederek d\u0131\u015far\u0131ya do\u011fru \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131klar\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki [M.nin] at\u0131lan kur\u015funlar nedeniyle yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n olay yerinden geldikleri minib\u00fcs ile ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131, akabinde minib\u00fcs\u00fcn terkedilmi\u015f olarak bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131k bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

27\/02\/2006 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131n\u0131n 25\/08\/2006 tarih ve 2006\/012750 vaka nolu olarak tanzim edilen, 27\/02\/2006 g\u00fcn\u00fc Cihanbeyli il\u00e7esi Kar\u015f\u0131yaka mahallesi S\u0131\u011f\u0131rc\u0131k yolu \u00fczerinde meydana gelen silahla yaralama ve gasp olay\u0131 ile ilgili DNA analizine ili\u015fkin ekspertiz raporu.(KL.43), Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131n\u0131n 31\/03\/2006 tarih ve 2006\/003252 vaka nolu olarak tanzim edilen, 27\/02\/2006 g\u00fcn\u00fc Cihanbeyli il\u00e7esi S\u0131\u011f\u0131rc\u0131k yolu \u00fczerinde meydana gelen silahla yaralama vegasp olay\u0131 ile ilgili DNA analizine ili\u015fkin ekspertiz raporu.(KL.43), Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131n\u0131n 07\/04\/2006 tarih ve 2006\/003442 vaka nolu olarak tanzim edilen, 27\/02\/2006 g\u00fcn\u00fc Cihanbeyli il\u00e7esinde meydana gelen silahla adam yaralama vegasp olay\u0131 ile ilgili DNA analizine ili\u015fkin ekspertiz raporu.(KL.43), […] Cihanbeyli \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 01\/03\/2006 tarihinde tanzim edilen [R.A.n\u0131n] [A.D. ve H.D.yi] te\u015fhisine ili\u015fkin te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131.(KL.43), Aksaray \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 28\/02\/2005 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen [A.A.ya] yapt\u0131r\u0131lan [A.D.yi] te\u015fhise ili\u015fkin foto\u011fraf te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131.(KL.43), Aksaray \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 01\/03\/2006 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen [A.A.ya] yapt\u0131r\u0131lan [A.D. ve H.D.nin] te\u015fhisine ili\u015fkin foto\u011fraf te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131 (KL.43), Cihanbeyli \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 28\/02\/2006 tarihinde tanzim edilen [T.T., A.F. ve M.A.n\u0131n] [A.D.yi] te\u015fhisine ili\u015fkin te\u015fhis tutana\u011f\u0131.(KL.43) birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, <\/p>\n

San\u0131klar [C.K. ve S.O.nun] Cihanbeyli’de min\u00fcb\u00fcsc\u00fcl\u00fck yapan m\u00fc\u015fteki [R.A.ya] Hodo\u011flu K\u00f6y\u00fc’nde cenazeye gideceklerini g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcp g\u00f6t\u00fcremeyece\u011fini sorduklar\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin gidebilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine 100,00 TL.’ye anla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131, il\u00e7e merkezinden d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131ktan sonra san\u0131k [C.nin] tuvalet ihtiyac\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek [R.nin] durmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fi, [C.nin] ara\u00e7tan indi\u011fi,bu s\u0131rada san\u0131k [S.nin] tabancay\u0131 m\u00fc\u015ftekiye do\u011frulttu\u011fu, [C.nin] de arac\u0131n \u00f6b\u00fcr taraf\u0131ndan m\u00fc\u015ftekiye silah\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi ve m\u00fc\u015ftekiye arac\u0131n arkas\u0131na ge\u00e7mesini ve uslu uslu oturmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledikleri, \u015fikayet\u00e7inin m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi kendisini b\u0131rakmalar\u0131n\u0131, arac\u0131 al\u0131p g\u00f6t\u00fcrmelerini istedi\u011fi, bunun \u00fczerine m\u00fc\u015ftekinin elini ba\u011flay\u0131p arka koltu\u011fa yat\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 ve [S.nin] arac\u0131 kullanmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir s\u00fcre sonra m\u00fc\u015ftekinin san\u0131k [C.ye] mukavemet g\u00f6stermesi \u00fczerine san\u0131k [C.yle] bo\u011fu\u015ftuklar\u0131, bu esnada [S.nin] arac\u0131 durdurup m\u00fc\u015ftekiye 3 el ate\u015f etti\u011fi ve m\u00fc\u015ftekinin hayati tehlikeye maruz b\u0131rakmadan 10 g\u00fcn i\u015f ve g\u00fc\u00e7 kayb\u0131na sebep olarak basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile iyile\u015febilecek \u015fekilde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fc\u015ftekinin kendisini camdan d\u0131\u015far\u0131 att\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra san\u0131klar\u0131n min\u00fcb\u00fcs\u00fc alarak yollar\u0131na devam ettikleri, bu esnada m\u00fc\u015ftekinin emniyete olay\u0131 ihbar etti\u011fi ve emniyetin yolda tertibat ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, yolda san\u0131klar\u0131n 26\/02\/2006 tarihinde [A.D.] sahte kimli\u011fi ile kiralad\u0131klar\u0131 ve arkadan takip eden Resmiye Vatansever’in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 Opel marka araca bindikleri ve h\u0131zla trafik ekiplerinin yan\u0131ndan ge\u00e7tikleri, polis memurlar\u0131 [T.T. ve A.F.nin] arac\u0131 takip ettikleri, san\u0131klardan [C.nin] uzun namlulu silah\u0131 arac\u0131n cam\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131p trafik ekibini tehdit etti\u011fi ve arac\u0131n Konya ili Karap\u0131nar il\u00e7esinde terkedilmi\u015f \u015fekilde bulundu\u011fu ve san\u0131klar\u0131n daha sonra 16\/05\/2006 tarihinde Ni\u011fde’de yakaland\u0131klar\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

31. \u00d6te yandan gerek\u00e7eli kararda ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un 17\/5\/2003, 15\/10\/1998, 14\/8\/1997, 20\/5\/2003, 16\/6\/1994, 18\/6\/2002 tarihli eylemlerle 2002 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen birden fazla eyleme i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc, kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilen eylemlerin t\u00fcm\u00fc de\u011ferlendirilmek suretiyle olu\u015fturulmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na konu eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn sebeplerini ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

32. An\u0131lan karara g\u00f6re \u00f6zetle ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha’n\u0131n Bulut’un, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu kabul edilen ki\u015filerin \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla tespit edilen ifadelerine dayan\u0131larak 17\/5\/2003, 15\/10\/1998, 14\/8\/1997, 16\/6\/1994 ve 18\/6\/2002 tarihli eylemlere i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Buna ek olarak 14\/8\/1997 tarihli eylem bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi odun deposunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

33. \u00d6te yandan gerek\u00e7eli kararda ba\u015fvurucunun 20\/5\/2003 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi kabul edilen ya\u011fma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kabul, su\u00e7un ma\u011fduru O.A.n\u0131n te\u015fhis ve beyanlar\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Son olarak ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un 2002 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen birden fazla eyleme i\u015ftirak etti\u011fine dair kabul\u00fcn tan\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n te\u015fhis ve beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re olu\u015fturuldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemenin bu husustaki de\u011ferlendirmelerinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 1992 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fcte kat\u0131larak TKP-ML-T\u0130KKO KONFERANS ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc i\u00e7erisinde Tokat-Sivas-Giresun-K\u0131r\u0131kkale ve Amasya illeri k\u0131rsal alan\u0131nda silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalara girdi\u011fi Nergiz-Bahar-Kezbankod isimlerini kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131, kale\u015fnikof marka uzun namlulu silah ile Diktiriyof marka tabanca ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131, zaman zaman … (K) [H.\u015e.nin] grubu ile birlikte hareket etti\u011fi ve faaliyetlerde bulundu\u011fu, Kastamonu Cide il\u00e7esinde 03\/08\/2006 g\u00fcn\u00fc [A.A.n\u0131n] ikamet etti\u011fi evde yap\u0131lan aramada yakalanarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, yap\u0131lan \u00fcst aramas\u0131nda kendine ait foto\u011frafta [S.C.] ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f sahte kimli\u011fin bulundu\u011fu, sahte kimlik kullanmakla ilgili olarak Cide C.Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca soru\u015fturman\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u0130ddianamenin 15. ve 16. sayfalar\u0131nda 7 eylem isnat edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

1-17\/05\/2003 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

27.05.2003 tarihinde Re\u015fadiye \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca ifadesi al\u0131nan […](K) [C.A.] ifadesinin 9. sayfas\u0131nda 17 May\u0131s 2003 tarihinde Eymir k\u00f6y\u00fcne giderken ya\u015fl\u0131 bir k\u00f6yl\u00fcile … (K), Nergiz (K) [ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha] ve …(K)’un g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme sonras\u0131nda Eymir k\u00f6y\u00fc ile ilgili bilgi ald\u0131ktan sonra ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn Eymir k\u00f6y\u00fcne girdiklerini, burada k\u00f6yl\u00fcleri cami \u00f6n\u00fcnde toplayarak Ajitasyon ve propaganda yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kendisi, …(K), …(K) ve …(K) ile birlikte caminin etraf\u0131nda emniyet\u00e7i olarak beklediklerini, propaganda …(K) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer \u00f6rg\u00fct mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n da…(K) sorumlulu\u011funda k\u00f6y\u00fcn d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda takviye olarak beklediklerini, k\u00f6yden 20 kg kadar un ve biraz tuz alarak ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn hi\u00e7bir yere u\u011framadan Eymir k\u00f6y\u00fcnden ald\u0131klar\u0131 erzak ile ihtiya\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidererek Dani\u015fment k\u00f6y\u00fc civar\u0131nda sakland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

… san\u0131k bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

2-15\/10\/1998 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

19\/03\/1999 tarihinde yakalanan …(Kod) [M.G.nin] Tokat \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda al\u0131nan ifadesinin 12. sayfas\u0131nda Tokat ili Top\u00e7am B\u00f6lgesi Role yak\u0131nlar\u0131nda 6-7 g\u00fcn kald\u0131ktan sonra 3 gruba ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, …(K) liderli\u011findeki 1. Grup i\u00e7erisinde Bahar(K)’un [ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha] Mara\u015fl\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve ailesinin \u0130stanbul ilinde ikamet etti\u011fini, esmer , k\u0131v\u0131rc\u0131k sa\u00e7l\u0131 iri yap\u0131l\u0131 24-25ya\u015flar\u0131nda diktiriyof marka tabanca ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

02\/12\/1998 tarihinde […](K) [Y.\u015e.nin] Tokat \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nda al\u0131nan ifadesinin9. sayfas\u0131nda: 15\/10\/1998 g\u00fcn\u00fc Tokat Merkez G\u00f6ltepe Role istasyonunun silahla taranmas\u0131 ve taciz eylemini […](K), Bahar(K), […](K), […](K)’un g\u00f6zetleme grubu i\u00e7erisinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayn\u0131 sayfada Tokat Merkez Eskik\u00f6y’deki g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerine taciz eylemini […](K) sorumlu\u011funda Bahar(K), […](K), […](K) ve […](K)’un kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndan san\u0131k bueylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

3-13-14\/08\/1997 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

13-14\/08\/1997 tarihinde Tekmezar odun deposunda meydana gelen ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapmak ve gasp olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olay tutanaklar\u0131(Tan\u0131klar [M.E., H.M.A., A.A., S.A., M.S., Ma.S., \u015e.S., Z.A., C.\u015e.,\u00d6.A., H.E., Ha.E., Se.A., K.T., H.A., Sey.A., M.C., M.L.nin] ifadeleri, olay yeri tespit tutana\u011f\u0131, olay yeri krokisi,(KL.15-\u0130, 51), [M.D.nin] ifadeleri (KL.19-D, 32), [S.G.nin] ifadeleri (KL. 2, 3, 19-I, 22, 28, 31), San\u0131klar\u0131n kat\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 eylemlerle ilgili olarak \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu … kod adl\u0131 [K.E.ye] ait ifade tutana\u011f\u0131 (KL.2, 32), [\u015e.A.n\u0131n] ifadeleri (KL.2, 19-H, 28, 31) birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

10\/08\/1998 tarihinde …(K) [S.G.nin] Tokat \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nda al\u0131nan ifadesinin 10.ve 11. sayfalar\u0131nda; 13\/08\/1997 g\u00fcn\u00fc Top\u00e7am B\u00f6lgesinde Tekmezar Orman Deposunun bas\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemine …(K) liderli\u011findeki grubun i\u00e7erisinde Bahar(K) ad\u0131yla yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, … olaydan sonra gasp edilen silah, telsiz, kimlik ve dok\u00fcmanlar\u0131n …(K) ve …(K) taraf\u0131ndan tehdit ve bask\u0131 yoluyla al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, orman deposu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131 bir odaya toplanarak …(K) ve Bahar(K) taraf\u0131ndan propaganda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, eylem sonras\u0131 b\u00f6lgeden ayr\u0131lmadan \u00f6nce Bahar(K) ve …(K) taraf\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ca binaya roket at\u0131\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, eylemin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc video kamera ile tespit ettiklerini, gruplar bir araya topland\u0131ktan sonra bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri izlediklerini, duvarlara yaz\u0131laman\u0131n …(K) taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini, eylemden sonra …(K)’un beraberinde getirmi\u015f oldu\u011fu kapal\u0131 minib\u00fcs ile Bo\u011fal\u0131 b\u00f6lgesinde bulunan grubun yan\u0131na gittiklerini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

10\/08\/1998 tarihinde …(K) [\u015e.A.n\u0131n] Tokat \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nca al\u0131nan ifadesinin 5. sayfas\u0131nda Top\u00e7am B\u00f6lgesi Tekmezar Orman Deposunun bas\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemine …(K) liderli\u011finde grup i\u00e7erisinde Bahar(K)’un bulundu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

13\/03\/1999 tarihinde …(K) [K.E.nin] Ankara Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde al\u0131nan ifadesinin 5 . Sayfas\u0131nda; … Tokat Merkez Tekmezar Orman Deposunun tahrip edilece\u011fini tecr\u00fcbe i\u00e7in kendisinin de kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131, Bahar(K) ile birlikte eylemde g\u00f6zc\u00fcl\u00fck yapmas\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, eylem s\u0131ras\u0131nda Bahar(K) ile kap\u0131y\u0131 tuttuklar\u0131n\u0131 ve i\u00e7eride bulunan \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131 d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131klar\u0131,<\/p>\n

\u0130fadesinin 6. sayfas\u0131nda; Tokat, Top\u00e7am Tekmezar Orman \u0130\u015fletmesi depolar\u0131n\u0131n tahrip edilmesi eylemine …, Bahar(K), …(K) kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

…(K) M.D.nin 11\/10\/1999 tarihinde Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde al\u0131nan ifadesinin 4.sayfas\u0131nda, Tokat ili Yaylac\u0131k(Tekmezar) Orman Deposunun bas\u0131lmas\u0131 olay\u0131 … bu eyleme kat\u0131lanlar aras\u0131nda kendisinin, Bahar(K)’un ve 9 ki\u015finin oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

… san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

4-20\/05\/2003 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

20\/05\/2003 tarihinde Baydarl\u0131 Kasabas\u0131nda meydana gelen \u00f6rg\u00fct propagandas\u0131 ve ma\u011fdur [O.A.n\u0131n] cep telefonunu gasp su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin evrak\u0131n olay tutanaklar\u0131(KL.15-B) birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

… ma\u011fdur [O.A.ya] ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131na ait foto\u011fraflar g\u00f6sterildi\u011finde san\u0131klar Zeliha Bulut, …(K) [C.G.], …(K) [H.Y.], …kod, …(K) [S.O.yu] te\u015fhis etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131k bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

5-16\/06\/1994 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

16\/06\/1994 g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 22.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Tokat ili Re\u015fadiye il\u00e7esi, G\u00f6kk\u00f6y k\u00f6y\u00fc Mahmut’un yaylas\u0131 tabir edilen b\u00f6lgede yap\u0131lan pusu s\u0131ras\u0131nda bir grup ter\u00f6ristle sa\u011flanan s\u0131cak temasla ilgili … de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

17\/03\/1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda yakalanan …(K) [A.E.] ifadesinde; … eylem grubunda bulunan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n […](K) [M.\u00c7.], […](K) [A.G.], […](K) [H.\u015e.], […](K) [A.C.], …(K) [E.\u00d6.], …(K) [Y.\u0130.], …(K) [G.K.], Bahar (K) Zeliha Bulut’un oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

30\/10\/1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130stanbul ilinde yakalanan …(K) [M.K.] ifadesinde; … eylem grubunda bulunan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc mensuplar\u0131n\u0131n …(K) [M.\u00c7.], …(K) [A.G.], …(K) [H.\u015e.], …(K) [A.C.], …(K) [E.\u00d6.], …(K) [Y.\u0130.], …(K) [G.K.], Bahar (K) Zeliha Bulut’un oldu\u011funu, bir s\u00fcre sonra eylem grubunun Almus-\u00c7ambulak K\u00f6y\u00fc halk\u0131ndan \u0130smail Karaca isimli \u015fahs\u0131 infaz ettikleri, 16\/07\/1994 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde Re\u015fadiye-Be\u015fdere k\u00f6y\u00fcnde bek\u00e7i t\u00fcfe\u011finin gasp edilmesi olay\u0131 ile 15\/06\/1994 g\u00fcn\u00fc g\u00fcvenlik kuvvetleri ile \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma olay\u0131n\u0131 yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n anlat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n

31\/01\/1997 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130stanbul ilinde yakalanan …(K) [D.\u00d6.] ifadesinde … kim taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bilmedi\u011fini, kendisine a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak grup i\u00e7erisinde bu iki olay\u0131n TKP\/ML T\u0130KKO (Darbeciler) KONFERANS EYLEM gurubu kanad\u0131nca yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylem grubunun …(K) [M.\u00c7.], …(K) [A.G.], […](K) [H.\u015e.], …](K) [A.C.], …(K) [E.\u00d6.], …(K) [Y.\u0130.], …(K) [G.K.], Bahar (K) Zeliha Bulut’tan olu\u015ftu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

… san\u0131k bu eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

6-18\/06\/2002 tarihli eylem;<\/p>\n

Mesudiye Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilen 18\/06\/2002 tarihli Arpalan K\u00f6y\u00fc Fattalfeliti mevkiinde \u0130\u011fdir Ormanlar\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri ile ilgili silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma olay\u0131 … de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

14\/08\/2003 tarihinde …(K) [C.K.n\u0131n] Re\u015fadiye \u0130l\u00e7e Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nca al\u0131nan ifadesinin 30. sayfas\u0131nda; 18 Haziran 2002 tarihlerinde Ordu Mesudiye \u0130\u011fdir ormanlar\u0131 b\u00f6lgesinde silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmada 22 \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu i\u00e7erisinde Bahar (K) Zeliha Bulut isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubunun da bulundu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

…(K) [C.G.] Tokat Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’nde verdi\u011fi 29\/08\/2004 tarihinde verdi\u011fi ifadesinin 23.sayfas\u0131nda; 18\/06\/2002 tarihinde Ordu ili Mesudiye Arpalan K\u00f6y\u00fc \u0130\u011fdir ormanlar\u0131 b\u00f6lgesinde g\u00fcvenlik kuvvetleri ile silahl\u0131 \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma eylemine kat\u0131lanlar aras\u0131nda …(K) [H.\u015e.], …(K) [Y.\u0130.] ve kendisinin de yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma \u0130\u011fdir ormanlar\u0131 b\u00f6lgesinde konaklad\u0131klar\u0131 esnada askerin kendisini fark edip ate\u015f etmesi sonucunda kendilerinin de ate\u015fle kar\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131k verdiklerini, kendilerinden veya askerden \u00f6len veya yaralanan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak b\u0131rak\u0131p ka\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 malzemelerin g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin eline ge\u00e7ti\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Ordu ili Mesudiye il\u00e7esi, Arpalan K\u00f6y\u00fc, Fettalfeliti mevkiinde g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri ile k\u0131sa s\u00fcreli \u00e7at\u0131\u015fma olay\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131k bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

7-Eyl\u00fcl 2002 tarihli eylemler;<\/p>\n

23\/09\/2002 tarihli \u015f\u00fcpheliler [H.\u015e., Y.\u0130., S.O.] ve Zeliha Bulut’a ili\u015fkin Erzurum Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yetkisizlik karar\u0131 ve ekleri (birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131, fezlekeler, olay yeri tespit ve inceleme tutanaklar\u0131, ifade tutanaklar\u0131, te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131 ([\u015e.K.,M.B.,M.Y., F.\u00d6., \u015e.\u00d6.,A.E., F.D., K.S., Y.S., S.D., F.S., H.K., H.S.S., \u0130.\u00c7.])(KL.21) birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar [H.\u015e., Y.\u0130., S.O.] ve Zeliha Bulut’un Ordu ili, Mesudiye il\u00e7esinde k\u0131rsal kesimde Eyl\u00fcl 2002 ay\u0131 i\u00e7inde Mesudiye il\u00e7esi k\u0131rsal\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fik tarihlerde Esatl\u0131, Bal\u0131kl\u0131, A\u015fa\u011f\u0131g\u00f6k\u00e7e, Herk\u00f6z\u00fc, Kara\u00e7\u00f6ren k\u00f6ylerine gruplar halinde silahl\u0131 olarak gelip girdikleri evlerde ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc lehine siyasi propaganda yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ayr\u0131ca k\u00f6y halk\u0131ndan erzak temin ettikleri anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan san\u0131k bu eylemden sorumlu tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7 OLARAK;<\/p>\n

i-San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 06\/10\/2006 tarihli iddianamede 17\/05\/2003, 15\/10\/1998, 13-14\/08\/1997, 20\/05\/2003, 16\/06\/1994, 18\/06\/2002, Eyl\u00fcl 2002 tarihli eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011finden ve bu eylemler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak vahim nitelikte oldu\u011fundan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya veya bu d\u00fczen yerine ba\u015fka bir d\u00fczen getirmeye veya bu d\u00fczenin fiilen uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi s\u00fcbuta erdi\u011fi i\u00e7in 765 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nundaki 146\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 cihetine gidilmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n

5. Savunman\u0131n Temyiz Talepleri ve Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n De\u011ferlendirmeleri<\/p>\n

34. Ba\u015fvurucular Resmiye Vatansever, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Zeliha Bulut’un m\u00fcdafii mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 27\/11\/2013 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n yan\u0131nda ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n istinabe yoluyla farkl\u0131 yarg\u0131 \u00e7evrelerinde kurulu mahkemelerde dinlendi\u011fini, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n taraflar\u0131n\u0131n an\u0131lan beyan delillerine do\u011frudan temas edemedi\u011fini, savunman\u0131n ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131klara soru sorabilme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n bir\u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131dan ceza muhakemesi kurallar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak icra edildi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sorgular\u0131 yap\u0131lmadan tan\u0131klar\u0131n dinlenmesinin ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131ndaki usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, soru\u015fturma evresinde ve istinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tek tek g\u00f6sterilerek te\u015fhis ettirilmesinin usul ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu ifade etti\u011fi dilek\u00e7ede 3\/3\/2011 tarihli dilek\u00e7esindeki taleplerin gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedilmesinden, farkl\u0131 soru\u015fturmalarda maddi ve manevi cebir ile tespit edilen ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 ifadelerin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda esas al\u0131nmas\u0131ndan yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

35. Ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir’in m\u00fcdafii 25\/11\/2013 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; ba\u015fvurucunun misafir olarak kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ikametg\u00e2hta ele ge\u00e7irilen silah ve patlay\u0131c\u0131 e\u015fyan\u0131n gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, takdir\u00ee indirim nedenlerinin uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, su\u00e7un unsuru olan silah\u0131n vahamet arz etti\u011fi kabul edilerek ve yetersiz gerek\u00e7eyle alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca cezaland\u0131rman\u0131n fikr\u00ee i\u00e7tima kurallar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ispatlanamayan sahte kimlik gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Bunun yan\u0131nda tan\u0131k dinletme, delil toplanmas\u0131 ve savunma yapmak i\u00e7in s\u00fcre verilmesi taleplerinin reddedilerek savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

36. Yarg\u0131tay 9. Ceza Dairesi 30\/12\/2013 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucular Resmiye Vatansever, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Zeliha Bulut hakk\u0131nda Anayasa’y\u0131 ihlal etme, ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demirhakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma, Tayyar Ero\u011flu, Remiye Vatansever ve Naki Demir hakk\u0131nda 10\/7\/1953 ve 6136 say\u0131l\u0131 Ate\u015fli Silahlar ve B\u0131\u00e7aklar ile Di\u011fer Aletler Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’a ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k, patlay\u0131c\u0131 madde bulundurma, resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ile ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever hakk\u0131nda 27\/2\/2006 tarihli ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte Resmiye Vatansever hakk\u0131nda 3\/1\/2006 tarihli ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc, delil yetersizli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

37. Ba\u015fvurucular Resmiye Vatansever, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Zeliha Bulut’un m\u00fcdafii kendisine tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131 haricen \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klayarak 30\/4\/2014 tarihinde, Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131n\u0131 18\/7\/2014 tarihinde tebli\u011f alan ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir’in m\u00fcdafii de 18\/8\/2014 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n

A. Ulusal Hukuk<\/p>\n

38. 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun\u2019un 146. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Te\u015fkilat\u0131 Esasiye Kanununun tamam\u0131n\u0131 veya bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 ta\u011fyir ve tebdil veya ilgaya ve bu kanun ile te\u015fekk\u00fcl etmi\u015f olan B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisini iskata veya vazifesini yapmaktan men\u2019e cebren te\u015febb\u00fcs edenler, a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet a\u011f\u0131r hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum olur.”<\/p>\n

39. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Anayasay\u0131 ihlal” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 309. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“(1) Cebir ve \u015fiddet kullanarak, T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya veya bu d\u00fczen yerine ba\u015fka bir d\u00fczen getirmeye veya bu d\u00fczenin fiilen uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemeye te\u015febb\u00fcs edenler a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131rlar.<\/p>\n

\u00a0(2) Bu su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ba\u015fka su\u00e7lar\u0131n i\u015flenmesi halinde, ayr\u0131ca bu su\u00e7lardan dolay\u0131 ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re cezaya h\u00fckmolunur.<\/p>\n

…”<\/p>\n

40. 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Sil\u00e2hl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 314. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“(1) Bu k\u0131sm\u0131n d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc ve be\u015finci b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinde yer alan su\u00e7lar\u0131 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla, silahl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct kuran veya y\u00f6neten ki\u015fi, on y\u0131ldan onbe\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n

\u00a0(2) Birinci f\u0131krada tan\u0131mlanan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olanlara, be\u015f y\u0131ldan on y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131 verilir.<\/p>\n

…”<\/p>\n

41. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “San\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunma delillerinin toplanmas\u0131 istemi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 177. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“(1) San\u0131k, tan\u0131k veya bilirki\u015finin davetini veya savunma delillerinin toplanmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011finde, bunlar\u0131n ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu olaylar\u0131 g\u00f6stermek suretiyle bu husustaki dilek\u00e7esini duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fcnden en az be\u015f g\u00fcn \u00f6nce mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131na veya h\u00e2kime verir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0(2) Bu dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine verilecek karar, kendisine derh\u00e2l bildirilir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0(3) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n kabul edilen istemleri, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131na da bildirilir.”<\/p>\n

42. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un “Tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015finin naiple veya istinabe yoluyla dinlenilmeleri” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 180. maddesinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“(1) Hastal\u0131k veya mal\u00fbll\u00fck veya giderilmesi olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmayan ba\u015fka bir nedenle bir tan\u0131k veya bilirki\u015finin uzun ve \u00f6nceden bilinmeyen bir zaman i\u00e7in duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n olanakl\u0131 bulunmayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa, mahkeme onun bir naiple veya istinabe yoluyla dinlenmesine karar verebilir.<\/p>\n

\u00a0(2) Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm, konutlar\u0131n\u0131n yetkili mahkemenin yarg\u0131 \u00e7evresi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 getirilmesi zor olan tan\u0131k ve bilirki\u015finin dinlenmesinde de uygulan\u0131r. <\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

(5) Yukar\u0131daki f\u0131kralar i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re tan\u0131k veya bilirki\u015finin ayn\u0131 anda g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcl\u00fc ve sesli ileti\u015fim tekni\u011finin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle dinlenebilmeleri olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu y\u00f6ntem uygulanarak ifade al\u0131n\u0131r. Buna olanak verecek teknik donan\u0131m\u0131n kurulmas\u0131na ve kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin esas ve usuller y\u00f6netmelikte g\u00f6sterilir.”<\/p>\n

43. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un “Do\u011frudan soru y\u00f6neltme” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 201. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, m\u00fcdafi veya vekil s\u0131fat\u0131yla duru\u015fmaya kat\u0131lan avukat; san\u0131\u011fa, kat\u0131lana, tan\u0131klara, bilirki\u015filere ve duru\u015fmaya \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f di\u011fer ki\u015filere, duru\u015fma disiplinine uygun olarak do\u011frudan soru y\u00f6neltebilirler. San\u0131k ve kat\u0131lan da mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131 veya h\u00e2kim arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile soru y\u00f6neltebilir. Y\u00f6neltilen soruya itiraz edildi\u011finde sorunun y\u00f6neltilmesinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011fine, mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131 karar verir. Gerekti\u011finde ilgililer yeniden soru sorabilir.”<\/p>\n

44. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un “Delillerin ortaya konulmas\u0131 ve reddi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 206. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ile san\u0131k veya m\u00fcdafii birlikte r\u0131za g\u00f6sterirlerse, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlenmesinden veya ba\u015fka herhangi bir delilin ortaya konulmas\u0131ndan vazge\u00e7ilebilir.”<\/p>\n

45. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un “Duru\u015fmada anlat\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu belge ve tutanaklar” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 209. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Naip veya istinabe yoluyla sorgusu yap\u0131lan san\u0131\u011fa ait sorgu tutanaklar\u0131, naip veya istinabe yoluyla dinlenen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifade tutanaklar\u0131 ile muayene ve ke\u015fif tutanaklar\u0131 gibi delil olarak kullan\u0131lacak belgeler ve di\u011fer yaz\u0131lar, adl\u00ee sicil \u00f6zetleri ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ki\u015fisel ve ekonomik durumuna ili\u015fkin bilgilerin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belgeler, duru\u015fmada anlat\u0131l\u0131r.”<\/p>\n

46. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un “Duru\u015fmada okunmayacak belgeler” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 210. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Olay\u0131n delili, bir tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131ndan ibaret ise, bu tan\u0131k duru\u015fmada mutlaka dinlenir. Daha \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan dinleme s\u0131ras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f tutana\u011f\u0131n veya yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n okunmas\u0131 dinleme yerine ge\u00e7emez.”<\/p>\n

47. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un “Delilleri takdir yetkisi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 217. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“(1) H\u00e2kim, karar\u0131n\u0131 ancak duru\u015fmaya getirilmi\u015f ve huzurunda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f delillere dayand\u0131rabilir. Bu deliller h\u00e2kimin vicdan\u00ee kanaatiyle serbest\u00e7e takdir edilir. <\/p>\n

(2) Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7, hukuka uygun bir \u015fekilde elde edilmi\u015f her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delille ispat edilebilir.”<\/p>\n

B. Uluslararas\u0131 Hukuk<\/p>\n

1. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/p>\n

48. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin “Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 6. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (d) bendi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n

“Bir su\u00e7 ile itham edilen herkes a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki asgari haklara sahiptir:<\/p>\n

…<\/p>\n

d) \u0130ddia tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 sorguya \u00e7ekmek veya \u00e7ektirmek, savunma tan\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n da iddia tan\u0131klar\u0131yla ayn\u0131 ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda davet edilmelerinin ve dinlenmelerinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 istemek.”<\/p>\n

2. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131<\/p>\n

49. Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM) Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye (B. No: 53848\/07, 16\/3\/2021) karar\u0131nda; beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haz\u0131r bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmada dinlenmesinin yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adilli\u011fini zedeleyip zedelemedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karardaki belirlemelere g\u00f6re silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131lanan ba\u015fvurucu, tan\u0131k E.A.n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi foto\u011fraf te\u015fhis i\u015flemi ile soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 54). Somut olayda E.A. yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada dinlenmi\u015ftir. Tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131lanan ba\u015fvurucu ise E.A.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi celsede haz\u0131r edilmemi\u015ftir. E.A.n\u0131n ba\u015fvuran\u0131n huzurunda dinlenmemesi i\u00e7in iyi bir neden oldu\u011funa dair bir tespite ula\u015famad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan A\u0130HM, E.A.n\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131n\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n verilmesinde belirleyici delil olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7\u00a7 42-46).<\/p>\n

50. A\u0130HM Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye karar\u0131nda; beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme huzurunda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 celsede dinlenmesinin olumsuz sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir. A\u0130HM bu durumda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu ve soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131na kavu\u015ftu\u011fu bir celsede dinlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan olumsuzlar\u0131n telafisi i\u00e7in yeterli d\u00fczeyde dengeleyici bir g\u00fcvence olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7\u00a7 47-55). \u00d6ncelikle A\u0130HM, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir celsede m\u00fcdafiinin tan\u0131\u011fa do\u011frudan soru sorabilmesinin baz\u0131 durumlarda yeterli bir kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvence olabilece\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 54). Bununla birlikte A\u0130HM bahsi ge\u00e7en g\u00fcvencenin yeterli d\u00fczeyde dengeleyici olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verirken mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fini sarsan unsurlar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi gerekti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Somut olayda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilgi sa\u011flamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k d\u00fczenlemelerine g\u00f6re belirli avantajlardan yararlanma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fdu\u011funa ve duru\u015fmada kendisine g\u00f6sterilen foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin ba\u015fvurucu oldu\u011fundan emin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair beyan\u0131na vurgu yapan A\u0130HM, an\u0131lan delilin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin zay\u0131flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015ftir (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7\u00a7 50-52).<\/p>\n

51. A\u0130HM, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme huzurunda dinlenmesine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n tavr\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6zlem yapma f\u0131rsat\u0131na sahip olundu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca kararda tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n dinlendi\u011fi celsede ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin haz\u0131r bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n baz\u0131 durumlarda savunma haklar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli olabilece\u011fini de belirtmi\u015ftir. Buna ek olarak ba\u015fvuran\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131ndan haberdar oldu\u011funu, bunlar\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funa ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine itiraz etme, olaylara ili\u015fkin kendi yorumunu sunma f\u0131rsat\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu da ifade etmi\u015ftir (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 54). Bununla birlikte ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n merkezinde ba\u015fvurucunun fiziksel te\u015fhisinin bulundu\u011funu ve bu hususta bir belirsizli\u011fin olu\u015ftu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnen A\u0130HM, an\u0131lan belirsizli\u011fin m\u00fcdafinin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulayabilmesiyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etmi\u015f; canl\u0131 te\u015fhisin \u00f6nemli rol oynad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve te\u015fhisle ilgili belirsizli\u011fin bulundu\u011fu davalarda ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi duru\u015fmada bizzat bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Fikret Karahan\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 55).<\/p>\n

52. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ilgili uluslararas\u0131 hukuk i\u00e7in ayr\u0131ca bkz. Abdulkerim Kahraman, B. No: 2020\/37267, 11\/5\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 27, 28; Nurcan G\u00fclabi, B. No: 2015\/15355, 23\/5\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 24-27.<\/p>\n

V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n

53. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 25\/3\/2025 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

A. Ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n

54. Ba\u015fvurucu; mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, deliller, savunmalar ve su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmadan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesi, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair somut delillerin g\u00f6sterilmemesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

55. Ba\u015fvurucunun anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eyleminden dolay\u0131 nitelikli ya\u011fma, vahim nitelikte silah bulundurma, tehlikeli maddelerin izinsiz olarak bulundurulmas\u0131 ve resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi, anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme ve 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eylemden dolay\u0131 nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm ve gerek\u00e7esi dikkate al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirilecektir.<\/p>\n

56. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

57. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131, ki\u015filerin hakkaniyete uygun bir \u015fekilde yarg\u0131lanmalar\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamay\u0131 ve bu amaca uygunluk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yarg\u0131laman\u0131n denetlenmesini ama\u00e7lamaktad\u0131r. Mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n, davan\u0131n temel maddi ve hukuki sorunlar\u0131 ile taraflarca ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ve davan\u0131n sonucunu etkileyen iddia ve itirazlar hakk\u0131nda delillerle ba\u011f kurulmak suretiyle yeterli gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermesi zorunludur. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki ve maddi sorunlar\u0131yla ilgisiz de\u011ferlendirmelere kararda yer verilmesi de gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131yla ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r. Karar gerek\u00e7esinin belirtilen unsurlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerine uygun \u015fekilde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011finin taraflarca \u00f6\u011frenilmesini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ayr\u0131ca demokratik bir toplumda kendi adlar\u0131na verilen yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n sebeplerini toplumun \u00f6\u011frenmesinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in de gereklidir (baz\u0131 eklemeler ve farkl\u0131l\u0131klarla birlikte bkz. Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31, 34).<\/p>\n

58. Di\u011fer taraftan kanun yolu incelemesi yapan merciin, yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan mahkemeyle ayn\u0131 sonuca ula\u015fmas\u0131 ve bunu ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyi kullanarak veya ayn\u0131 at\u0131fla karar\u0131na yans\u0131tmas\u0131, karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli g\u00f6r\u00fclebilir. Bununla birlikte ilk derece mahkemesince kar\u015f\u0131lanmayan veya ancak ilk defa kanun yolu merciine ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n kanun yolu merciince de de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline yol a\u00e7abilir (baz\u0131 eklemeler ve farkl\u0131l\u0131klarla birlikte bkz. Mehmet Yavuz [1.B.], B. No: 2013\/2995, 20\/2\/2014, \u00a7 51).\u201d<\/p>\n

59. Somut olayda ilk derece mahkemesi vahim nitelikte kabul etti\u011fi 3\/1\/2006 ve 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eylemlere Resmiye Vatansever’in de kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederek anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme ve nitelikli ya\u011fma (iki kez) su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar\u0131 temyizen inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 3\/1\/2006 tarihli eylemle ilgili olarak ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda ba\u015fvurucunun 3\/1\/2006 tarihli eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair delil bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle beraatine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015f; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme ve 27\/2\/2006 tarihli olayla ilgili nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131 onam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n

60. \u015eu h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvurucunun anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme ve nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eyleme i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki kabul oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 24, 30).<\/p>\n

61. \u0130lk derece mahkemesi ba\u015fvurucunun 27\/2\/2006 tarihli eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederken DNA analizine ili\u015fkin 31\/3\/2006, 7\/4\/2006 ve 25\/8\/2006 tarihli ekspertiz raporlar\u0131na (bkz. \u00a7 22), R.A., A.A., T.T., A.F. ve M.A.n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucuyla ilgili herhangi bir tespit i\u00e7ermeyen te\u015fhis i\u015flemlerine dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 30).<\/p>\n

62. \u00d6ncelikle gerek\u00e7eli kararda R.A., A.A., T.T., A.F. ve M.A.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu te\u015fhis etti\u011fine dair bir belirleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna ek olarak ba\u015fvurucunun at\u0131f yap\u0131lan DNA analizine ili\u015fkin 1\/3\/2006, 7\/4\/2006 ve 25\/8\/2006 tarihli ekspertiz raporlar\u0131ndaki hangi tespite dayan\u0131larak su\u00e7lu bulundu\u011fu da a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131nda da ilk derece mahkemesinin kabul\u00fcnden farkl\u0131 olarak yeni bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

63. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda, ekspertiz raporlar\u0131n\u0131n tarih ve say\u0131lar\u0131na ve te\u015fhis i\u015flemlerine yer verilmi\u015f ancak belirtilen i\u015flem ve raporlar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyla olan ilgisi a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin ba\u015fvurucunun eylem ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 27\/2\/2006 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7una i\u015ftirak etti\u011fini g\u00f6steren delillerle ili\u015fkilendirerek yeterli bir \u015fekilde ortaya koydu\u011funu kabul etmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

64. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

B. Ba\u015fvurucular Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Zeliha Bulut Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n

65. Ba\u015fvurucular gerek\u00e7eli kararda beyanlar\u0131na yer verilen tan\u0131klar\u0131n Mahkemede dinlenmedi\u011fini, tan\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcjelerinin bulundu\u011fu duru\u015fma ortam\u0131nda dinlenmemesi ve istinabe duru\u015fmalar\u0131ndaki usule ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar nedeniyle g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015fen beyan delilinin kullan\u0131lmamas\u0131na dair taleplerinin gerek\u00e7esiz olarak reddedildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

66. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n iddialar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

67. Ba\u015fvurucu Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, vahim nitelikte silah bulundurma, tehlikeli maddelerin izinsiz olarak bulundurulmas\u0131 ve resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik, ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut’un ise anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131nda tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi, yaln\u0131zca anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etme su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcm ve gerek\u00e7esi dikkate al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirilecektir.<\/p>\n

68. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

69. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tan\u0131k kavram\u0131n\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa isnat edilen fiil hakk\u0131nda bilgi veren herhangi bir ki\u015fi \u015feklinde \u00f6zerk olarak yorumlam\u0131\u015f ve tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131 ile ilgili ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir (Atila O\u011fuz Boyal\u0131, B. No: 2013\/99, 20\/3\/2014; Sel\u00e7uk Demir, B. No: 2014\/9783, 22\/1\/2015; AZ. M., B. No: 2013\/560, 16\/4\/2015; Baran Karada\u011f, B. No: 2014\/12906, 7\/5\/2015; Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, B. No: 2019\/30221, 28\/12\/2021). Buna g\u00f6re bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n aleyhine olan tan\u0131klar\u0131 sorguya \u00e7ekme veya \u00e7ektirme hakk\u0131 vard\u0131r. Hakk\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tan\u0131klara soru y\u00f6neltebilmesi, onlarla y\u00fczle\u015febilmesi ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu s\u0131nama imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olmas\u0131 adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yap\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gereklidir (AZ. M., \u00a7 55). Di\u011fer yandan bir mahk\u00fbmiyet -sadece veya belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde- san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma veya yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir kimse taraf\u0131ndan verilen ifadelere dayand\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n haklar\u0131 Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesindeki g\u00fcvencelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f olur (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n

70. Anayasa Mahkemesi tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131yla ilgili olarak verdi\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda somut bir yarg\u0131lama \u00f6ncesinde veya haricinde elde edilen tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n delil olarak kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn yarg\u0131laman\u0131n adilli\u011fine zarar verip vermedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmek i\u00e7in \u00fc\u00e7 a\u015famal\u0131 bir test uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade eder. Buna g\u00f6re ilk olarak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemede haz\u0131r edilmemesi ge\u00e7erli bir nedenin mevcudiyetine dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130kinci olarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n verdi\u011fi beyan\u0131n mahk\u00fbmiyetin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek veya belirleyici delil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Sorgulama veya sorgulatma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n tek veya belirleyici delil oldu\u011funun tespit edilmesi durumunda ise \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u015fama olarak savunma taraf\u0131n\u0131n maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu zorluklar\u0131n telafi edilmesi amac\u0131yla yeterli d\u00fczeyde kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi ortaya konulmal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Abdurrahim Balur, B. No: 2013\/5467, 7\/1\/2016, \u00a7 80; Onur Urbay, B. No: 2014\/6222, 6\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 36, 40; Zekeriya Sevim, B. No: 2018\/18989, 16\/6\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 44, 51). Bu kapsamda, h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken sorgulanmam\u0131\u015f tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen ba\u015fka do\u011frulay\u0131c\u0131 delillere dayan\u0131lmas\u0131 telafi edici g\u00fcvencelerden biri olarak kabul edilebilir (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 39). Sorgulanmayan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011finin ve do\u011frulu\u011funun saptanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla savunma taraf\u0131na sa\u011flanabilecek bir di\u011fer telafi edici g\u00fcvence, san\u0131\u011fa olay\u0131 kendi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nmas\u0131d\u0131r (Orhan G\u00fclery\u00fcz, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n

1. \u0130lkelerin Ba\u015fvurucu Tayyar Ero\u011flu Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden De\u011ferlendirilmesi<\/p>\n

71. Mahkeme 11\/5\/2006 tarihinde Ordu’daki MHP il binas\u0131 ve \u00dclk\u00fc Ocaklar\u0131 Dergi Temsilcili\u011fine bomba d\u00fczenekleri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ve patlat\u0131lmas\u0131 eylemini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini kabul etti\u011fi ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmada sorgulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131k T.U.nun soru\u015fturma evresindeki canl\u0131 te\u015fhisine dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 29). Gerek\u00e7eli kararda, tan\u0131k T.U.nun ba\u015fvurucunun (san\u0131\u011f\u0131n) da haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu bir celsede dinlenmemesine ili\u015fkin olarak ge\u00e7erli bir nedene yer vermemi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte b\u00f6yle bir nedeni g\u00f6stermemesi, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin yukar\u0131da belirtilen testin di\u011fer a\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131n da de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

72. Mahkeme, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131 s\u0131ra delil olarak ba\u015fvurucunun yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ikametg\u00e2h\u0131nda bulunan patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddelerle somut olayda elde edilenlerin ayn\u0131 nitelikte olmas\u0131na da dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemenin ayn\u0131 ikametg\u00e2hta yakalanan di\u011fer ki\u015fileri an\u0131lan gerek\u00e7eyle sorumlu tutmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmada dinlenmeyen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan ve te\u015fhisinin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcren tek olmasa da belirleyici delil oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekir. Bu nedenle \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc a\u015fama olarak savunma taraf\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada dinlenilmemesi nedeniyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 zorluklar\u0131n telafi edilmesi amac\u0131yla yeterli d\u00fczeyde kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayan bir usul\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi belirlenmelidir.<\/p>\n

73. Somut olayda tan\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcdafiinin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinabe duru\u015fmas\u0131nda dinlenmi\u015f; m\u00fcdafii bu duru\u015fmada tan\u0131\u011fa soru sorma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanabilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n

74. Ba\u015fvurucunun yoklu\u011funda beyanda bulunan tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve soru sorma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanabildi\u011fi duru\u015fmada dinlenmesi, -baz\u0131 durumlarda- yeterli bir dengeleyici g\u00fcvence olabilir. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle san\u0131k ile tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n y\u00fczy\u00fcze gelmesinin \u00f6nem arz etmedi\u011fi davalarda sadece m\u00fcdafiin, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda dinlenen tan\u0131\u011fa do\u011frudan soru sorabilme imkan\u0131na ula\u015fmas\u0131 yeterli bir kar\u015f\u0131 dengeleyici g\u00fcvence olarak kabul edilebilir. Bahsi ge\u00e7en g\u00fcvencenin yeterli d\u00fczeyde dengeleyici olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verirken tan\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131n, fiziksel te\u015fhise ili\u015fkin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fini sarsan unsurlar\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti \u00f6nemlidir. Bu kapsamda tek ya da belirleyici delilin, fiziksel te\u015fhise ya da maddi olaya ili\u015fkin tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 oldu\u011fu bir ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu delilin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine etkili bir \u015fekilde itiraz edebilmesi i\u00e7in tan\u0131k ile ayn\u0131 duru\u015fmada bulunmas\u0131 gerekebilir (Kadir \u0130nan [2.B.], B. No: 2020\/23928, 30\/10\/2024, \u00a7 37).<\/p>\n

75. Buna ek olarak tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme huzurunda dinlenip dinlenmedi\u011fi, mahkemenin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n tavr\u0131 ve g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fi hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6zlem yapma f\u0131rsat\u0131na sahip olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n

76. \u00d6te yandan su\u00e7 tipi i\u00e7in kanunda belirlenen cezan\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 artt\u0131k\u00e7a duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunarak savunma yapman\u0131n da \u00f6neminin artaca\u011f\u0131 hususunda tart\u0131\u015fma yoktur (Mehmet Erg\u00fcn [GK], B. No: 2019\/34180, 25\/7\/2023, \u00a7 41). Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda beyanlar\u0131 tespit edilen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafi huzurunda dinlenmesinin yeterli bir dengeleyici g\u00fcvence olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken su\u00e7 tipi i\u00e7in kanunda belirlenen cezan\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r (Kadir \u0130nan [2.B.], \u00a7 36). Nitekim san\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunarak savunma yapmas\u0131nda maksat, aleyhine olan delilleri do\u011frudan g\u00f6zlemleyebilmesi ve onlar\u0131n g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrebilmesidir.<\/p>\n

77. Somut olayda tan\u0131k, Ordu’daki MHP il binas\u0131na bomba d\u00fczene\u011fi b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 olay\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak ifade vermi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k, bomban\u0131n b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde bek\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaktad\u0131r. 19\/5\/2006 tarihli Canl\u0131 Te\u015fhis Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re tan\u0131k, aralar\u0131nda di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131n da bulundu\u011fu be\u015f ki\u015fiden ba\u015fvurucuyu te\u015fhis etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca istinabe mahkemesindeki duru\u015fmada tespit edilen ifadesinde olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve ba\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fapkay\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fc net olarak hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 19).<\/p>\n

78. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucuya olaylar\u0131 kendi bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna ek olarak h\u00fckme ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olayda kullan\u0131lanla ba\u015fvurucunun yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 evde ele ge\u00e7irilen patlay\u0131c\u0131 maddelerin ayn\u0131 nitelikte olmas\u0131na dayan\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 29). Ayr\u0131ca tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinde tespit edilen beyanlar\u0131 ile gerek\u00e7eye konu Canl\u0131 Te\u015fhis Tutana\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n uyumsuz ya da \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n

79. Bununla birlikte tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n kendisiyle konu\u015ftu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren ba\u015fvurucunun fiziksel te\u015fhisine (ses te\u015fhisiyle birlikte) ve maddi olaya ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu da a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131n\u0131n bu niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fcdafinin delilin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu kadar etkili \u015fekilde ortaya koyamayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Kald\u0131 ki tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme huzurunda dinlenmedi\u011fi ve tan\u0131k beyan\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ba\u015fvurucunun a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verildi\u011fi de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 elde edememesiyle olu\u015fan dengesizli\u011fin m\u00fcdafinin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulayabilmesiyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. \u0130lkelerin Ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden De\u011ferlendirilmesi<\/p>\n

80. Mahkeme, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun en az yedi farkl\u0131 eyleme i\u015ftirak etti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme ba\u015fvurucunun 17\/5\/2003, 15\/10\/1998, 14\/8\/1997, 16\/6\/1994 ve 18\/6\/2002 tarihli eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederken \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ki\u015filerin \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla al\u0131nan ifadelerine dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte 14\/8\/1997 tarihli olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi odun deposunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun 20\/5\/2003 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ya\u011fma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kabul\u00fcnde ise su\u00e7un ma\u011fduru O.A.n\u0131n te\u015fhis ve beyanlar\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun 2002 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen birden fazla eyleme i\u015ftirak etti\u011fini kabul eden Mahkeme, hangileri oldu\u011funu a\u00e7\u0131klamadan genel olarak tan\u0131k ve ma\u011fdurlar\u0131n te\u015fhis ve beyanlar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak en az yedi farkl\u0131 olaydan su\u00e7lu bulunmu\u015f ve m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

81. Ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilen eylemlerin t\u00fcm\u00fc 765 say\u0131l\u0131 m\u00fclga Kanun\u2019un y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte oldu\u011fu zaman ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015ftir. Bu Kanun’a g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirme yapan Mahkeme, eylemleri b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f; tek bir m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi incelenirken de ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilen eylemler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak ele al\u0131nacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n

82. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan Mahkemenin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fmada sorgulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda tan\u0131klar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun (san\u0131\u011f\u0131n) da haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu bir celsede dinlenmemesine ili\u015fkin olarak ge\u00e7erli nedene yer verilmemi\u015ftir. Ancak b\u00f6yle bir nedenin g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131, tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yeterli de\u011fildir. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak yukar\u0131da belirtilen testin di\u011fer a\u015famalar\u0131n\u0131n da de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

83. Gerek\u00e7eli kararda ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na konu eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kabul, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen ki\u015filerin \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla verdikleri ifadelere, te\u015fhislerine ve tan\u0131k O.A.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmada dinlenmeyen tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ve te\u015fhisinin mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na g\u00f6t\u00fcren tek delil oldu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n

84. Ba\u015fvurucunun 17\/5\/2003, 15\/10\/1998, 14\/8\/1997, 16\/6\/1994 ve 18\/6\/2002 tarihli eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilirken beyanlar\u0131 esas al\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filerin kovu\u015fturma evresinde dinlendikleri tespit edilememi\u015ftir. 2002 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen birden fazla eyleme i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te hangi eylemlere kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, hangi ma\u011fdur ve tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak eylemlerden sorumlu tutuldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun 20\/5\/2003 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi kabul edilen ya\u011fma su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kabul, su\u00e7un ma\u011fduru O.A.n\u0131n te\u015fhis ve beyanlar\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. O.A. ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcdafiinin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinabe duru\u015fmas\u0131nda dinlenmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 21). Ayr\u0131ca 14\/8\/1997 tarihinde Tekmezar odun deposunda meydana gelen ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma ve ya\u011fma eylemleriyle ilgili beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi ifade edilen tan\u0131klar M.E., H.M.A., A.A., H.E., S.A., Me.S., Ma.S. de ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcdafiinin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 farkl\u0131 bir istinabe duru\u015fmas\u0131nda dinlenmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 20).<\/p>\n

85. San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda beyanlar\u0131 tespit edilen tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafi huzurunda dinlenmesinin yeterli bir dengeleyici bir g\u00fcvence olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken hususlardan daha \u00f6nce s\u00f6z edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 74-76).<\/p>\n

86. 20\/5\/2003 tarihli olayla ilgili olarak tan\u0131k (ma\u011fdur) O.A. ifade vermi\u015ftir. \u0130n\u015faatta \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada d\u00f6rt ki\u015finin yan\u0131na geldi\u011fini ve zorla telefonunu ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan O.A. soru\u015fturma evresindeki ifadesinde; foto\u011fraf \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 te\u015fhisle telefonunu alan ki\u015fileri M. kod adl\u0131 C.G., S. kod adl\u0131 H.Y., H. kod adl\u0131 S.O. ve K. kod adl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olarak te\u015fhis etti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Kovu\u015fturma evresinde Re\u015fadiye Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde dinlenen O.A. kendisine g\u00f6sterilen foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin (Zeliha Bulut) olay yerinde g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kad\u0131n oldu\u011funu sand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, net olarak hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nceki te\u015fhisinde de net olarak hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 21).<\/p>\n

87. \u00d6te yandan 14\/8\/1997 tarihli olayla ilgili olarak Tokat A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde dinlenen tan\u0131k M.E. kendisine doktor diye hitap edilen kad\u0131n\u0131n foto\u011fraftaki (Zeliha Bulut) ki\u015fi olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 aradan on y\u0131l ge\u00e7ti\u011fi i\u00e7in s\u00f6yleyemeyece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k H.M.A. foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin olay tarihinde kendisiyle ilgilenen kad\u0131na benzedi\u011fini ancak aradan zaman ge\u00e7ti\u011finden bundan emin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, tan\u0131klar H.E. ve S.A. ise foto\u011fraftakinin kendilerine konu\u015fma yapan ki\u015fiye benzedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte tan\u0131klar Ma.S. ve A.A. foto\u011fraftaki ki\u015finin kendilerine konu\u015fma yapan ki\u015fiye benzemedi\u011fini, Me.S. ise foto\u011fraftakinin kendileriyle konu\u015fan ki\u015fi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 20).<\/p>\n

88. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ba\u015fvurucuya olaylar\u0131 kendi bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131na g\u00f6re anlatma ve delillerini sunma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bununla birlikte mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcnde beyanlar\u0131 esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde hi\u00e7 dinlenmedi\u011fi, bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ise yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyen mahkeme huzurunda ba\u015fvurucunun kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fmada dinlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

89. 20\/5\/2003 tarihli olayla ilgili olarak kovu\u015fturma evresinde dinlenen tan\u0131k O.A. soru\u015fturma evresinde tespit edilen beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyu te\u015fhis etti\u011fini ifade etmemi\u015f, kovu\u015fturma evresinde ise telefonunu alan ki\u015filer aras\u0131ndaki kad\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 net olarak hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. 14\/8\/1997 tarihli olayla ilgili olarak kovu\u015fturma evresinde dinlenen tan\u0131klar\u0131n ise genel olarak kesin bir te\u015fhiste bulunmad\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu \u015fekilde te\u015fhisle ilgili belirsizli\u011fin bulundu\u011fu davalarda ba\u015fvurucunun tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi duru\u015fmada bizzat bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem arz etti\u011fi belirtilmelidir.<\/p>\n

90. Tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun te\u015fhisine ve maddi olaya ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu da a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Tan\u0131k beyan\u0131n\u0131n bu niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda m\u00fcdafinin delilin g\u00fcvenilirli\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu kadar etkili bir \u015fekilde ortaya koyamayaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca 2002 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131nda birden fazla eyleme kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilirken bu kabuldeki eylemler ve ili\u015fkili tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131klar\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkeme huzurunda dinlenmedi\u011fi, tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verildi\u011fi de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun soru sorma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 elde edememesiyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan dengesizli\u011fin m\u00fcdafinin tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulayabilmesiyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

3. Sonu\u00e7<\/p>\n

91. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucular Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Zeliha Bulut y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

C. Ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n

92. Ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden karar\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki esasl\u0131 iddialar\u0131n yan\u0131ts\u0131z b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n Abdullah Top\u00e7u (B. No: 2014\/8868, 19\/4\/2017, \u00a7\u00a7 77,78) ve Yasemin Ek\u015fi, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un m\u00fclga 250. maddesi ile yetkili mahkemelerin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen 2\/7\/2012 tarihli ve 6352 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131 Hizmetlerinin Etkinle\u015ftirilmesi Amac\u0131yla Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve Bas\u0131n Yay\u0131n Yoluyla \u0130\u015flenen Su\u00e7lara \u0130li\u015fkin Dava ve Cezalar\u0131n Ertelenmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un ge\u00e7ici 2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan mahkemede yarg\u0131lamaya devam edilmesi nedeniyle kanuni h\u00e2kim g\u00fcvencesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131n\u0131n Deniz Seki (B. No: 2014\/5170, 25\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 47-57), delil toplanmas\u0131 taleplerinin reddedilmesi sebebiyle silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n \u00c7etin Saner (B. No: 2021\/32118, 29\/3\/2023, \u00a7 75-91), delillerin takdirinde hataya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmesi, ceza ki\u015fiselle\u015ftirilirken hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, takdir\u00ee indirim nedenlerinin uygulanmamas\u0131, su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n te\u015fdit sebebi yap\u0131lamas\u0131 ve san\u0131klar\u0131n sorgusu yap\u0131lmadan ma\u011fdur ile tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine ba\u015flanmas\u0131 nedeniyle hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n Ahmet Sa\u011flam (B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 39-52), aleyhine beyanda bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun (san\u0131\u011f\u0131n) haz\u0131r bulundu\u011fu duru\u015fmada dinlenmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n Zekeriya Sevim kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

D. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n

93. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n hepsi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tutuklama tedbirlerinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve masumiyet karinesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n F\u0131rat \u0130\u015fg\u00f6ren (B. No: 2014\/6425, 17\/11\/2016, \u00a7 34) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle, makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n Ferat Y\u00fcksel (B. No: 2014\/13828, 12\/9\/2018) ve Veysi Ado ([GK] B. No: 2022\/100837, 27\/4\/2023) kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle, te\u015fhis tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde elde edilip usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re tespit edilmedi\u011fine ve verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na esasl\u0131 dayanak te\u015fkil etti\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n Cevat Temel \u00d6zkaynak, atf\u0131 c\u00fcr\u00fcm niteli\u011findeki beyanlar\u0131n delil olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n Cemal G\u00fcnsel kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

94. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n, Resmiye Vatansever y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verildi\u011finden uygun g\u00f6r\u00fclen giderime g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri di\u011fer \u015fik\u00e2yetleri ile insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan ceza yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda kabul edilebilirlik ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca bir inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

VI. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n

95. Ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Resmiye Vatansever ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131, miktar belirtmeksizin maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n

96. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n

97. Bu konuda \u00f6nemle belirtilmelidir ki su\u00e7lu-su\u00e7suz karar\u0131 vermek ya da daha hafif veya a\u011f\u0131r ceza belirlemek de Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Ruh\u015fen Mahmuto\u011flu, B. No: 2015\/22, 15\/1\/2020, \u00a7 67). Belirli bir davaya ili\u015fkin olarak delilleri de\u011ferlendirme ve g\u00f6sterilen delilin davayla ilgili olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verme yetkisi kural olarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten derece mahkemelerine aittir (Orhan K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 [GK], B. No: 2014\/4704, 1\/2\/2018, \u00a7 44). Bu ba\u011flamda somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmaya te\u015febb\u00fcs edip etmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde karar vermek Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6revi de\u011fildir. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen ihlal karar\u0131, san\u0131klar\u0131n beraat etti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmedi\u011fi gibi ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n gereklerinin yerine getirilmesi amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lacak yeniden yarg\u0131lama neticesinde san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda mutlaka beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na da gelmemektedir. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere gereken i\u015flemler yerine getirildikten sonra yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede delillerin takdir bi\u00e7imine g\u00f6re mahkemenin benzer veya farkl\u0131 bir sonuca varmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n

98. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lama evrelerindeki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n delil de\u011feriyle ilgili bir derecelendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almamaktad\u0131r. Di\u011fer birifadeyle bu hak, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmadaki beyanlar\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir g\u00fcvence i\u00e7ermez. Savunmaya duru\u015fmada tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgulama f\u0131rsat\u0131 tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n di\u011fer haklar\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi s\u00fcrece tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n yarg\u0131lama evresindeki beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n hangisine itibar edilece\u011fi meselesi karar veren mahkemenin takdirindedir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Musa Y\u0131lmaz Acar, B.No:2013\/1664, 16\/7\/2014,\u00a7 53).<\/p>\n

99. \u00d6te yandan ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan manevi, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131klar\u0131ndan maddi tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n

VII. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n

A. 1. Tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

2. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever y\u00f6n\u00fcnden KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

3. \u0130leri s\u00fcr\u00fclen ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik kriterlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir y\u00f6n\u00fcnden KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

4. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin di\u011fer g\u00fcvencelerin ve insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan ceza yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Resmiye Vatansever y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE YER OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n

5. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik kriterlerini kar\u015f\u0131lamamas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n

B. 1. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu Zeliha Bulut ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

2. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu Resmiye Vatansever y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin tan\u0131k sorgulama ve gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Tokat 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2014\/311) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

D. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

E. 1. 206.10 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.206,10 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Tayyar Ero\u011flu ve Resmiye Vatansever’e \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n

2. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu Naki Demir \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n

F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n

G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 25\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 25\/3\/2025 tarihli ve 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 TAYYAR ERO\u011eLU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2014\/5921) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin Ozan ADIYAMAN Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Tayyar ERO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Zeliha BULUT \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Resmiye VATANSEVER Vekili : Av. Ercan KANAR \u00a0 \u00a0 4. Naki DEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. Eylem HAKVERD\u0130 DUYAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza davas\u0131nda yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuru ayr\u0131ca tutuklama tedbirinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, tahliye umudu olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilme nedeniyle insan haysiyeti ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayan ceza yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin di\u011fer baz\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Resmiye Vatansever ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun m\u00fcdafiileri taraf\u0131ndan 30\/4\/2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAYM'nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AYM'nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 TAYYAR ERO\u011eLU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2014\/5921) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin Ozan ADIYAMAN Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Tayyar ERO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Zeliha BULUT \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Resmiye VATANSEVER Vekili : Av. Ercan KANAR \u00a0 \u00a0 4. Naki DEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. Eylem HAKVERD\u0130 DUYAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza davas\u0131nda yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuru ayr\u0131ca tutuklama tedbirinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, tahliye umudu olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilme nedeniyle insan haysiyeti ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayan ceza yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin di\u011fer baz\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Resmiye Vatansever ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun m\u00fcdafiileri taraf\u0131ndan 30\/4\/2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-02T07:54:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"69 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"AYM’nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-02T07:54:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":13956,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\",\"name\":\"AYM'nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-02T07:54:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AYM’nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AYM'nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"AYM'nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 TAYYAR ERO\u011eLU VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2014\/5921) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 25\/3\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : H\u00fcseyin Ozan ADIYAMAN Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Tayyar ERO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Zeliha BULUT \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Resmiye VATANSEVER Vekili : Av. Ercan KANAR \u00a0 \u00a0 4. Naki DEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. Eylem HAKVERD\u0130 DUYAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ceza davas\u0131nda yeterli gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmeden mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n, beyanlar\u0131 belirleyici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan tan\u0131klar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fmada sorgulanmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n verilmemesi nedeniyle tan\u0131k sorgulama hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvuru ayr\u0131ca tutuklama tedbirinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve uzun s\u00fcrmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, tahliye umudu olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcnceye kadar hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilme nedeniyle insan haysiyeti ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayan ceza yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin di\u011fer baz\u0131 g\u00fcvencelerin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucular Zeliha Bulut, Resmiye Vatansever ve Tayyar Ero\u011flu’nun m\u00fcdafiileri taraf\u0131ndan 30\/4\/2014 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-02T07:54:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"69 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"AYM’nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-02T07:54:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"},"wordCount":13956,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/","name":"AYM'nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-02T07:54:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/aymnin-2014-5921-basvuru-numarali-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AYM’nin 2014\/5921 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73497","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73497"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73497\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73497"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73497"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73497"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}