{"id":48213,"date":"2025-04-07T12:51:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T09:51:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T12:51:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T09:51:00","slug":"yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

2. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2012\/16833 E., 2013\/17864 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 :Konya 3. Aile Mahkemesi
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 :26.04.2012
\nNUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/668 Karar no:2012\/507<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan; her iki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilerek; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilmekle; duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 25.06.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebligata ra\u011fmen taraflar ad\u0131na kimse gelmedi. \u0130\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan zina hukuki nedeni (TMK md. 161) ve evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1), daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n) taraf\u0131ndan ise evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talep edilmi\u015f, mahkemece her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 166\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve toplanan delillerden; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n)’\u0131n 16.07.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fc ortak konuta erkek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fahs\u0131n banyoda yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenmi\u015f halde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu vak\u0131a mahkemece de sabit kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Kad\u0131n\u0131n, yaln\u0131zken bir ba\u015fka erke\u011fi ortak konuta almas\u0131 ve bu \u015fahs\u0131n yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenirken yakalanmas\u0131 zinan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na delalet eder. Bu bak\u0131mdan zina kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n zina sebebiyle kabul\u00fc gerekirken, bu y\u00f6n nazara al\u0131nmadan yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7: Temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen sebeple BOZULMASINA, bozma sebebine g\u00f6re yeniden karar verilmesi gerekli hale gelen daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 kad\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 ve fer’ilerinin incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, istek halinde temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n yat\u0131rana geri verilmesine, i\u015fbu karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi. 25.06.2013 (Sal\u0131)<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI OY YAZISI<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131-daval\u0131 koca taraf\u0131ndan evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1) ve zina hukuki nedenine (TMK md. 161), daval\u0131-davac\u0131 kad\u0131n taraf\u0131ndan ise evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bo\u015fanma davalar\u0131nda, mahkemece her iki taraf\u0131n “evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131” nedenlerine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma davalar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile, taraflar\u0131n T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 166\/1-2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca BO\u015eANMALARINA karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 161. maddesinden kaynaklanan Z\u0130NA hukuki nedenine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma talebi ile bir karar verilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n

Hakim, taraflar\u0131n talepleriyle ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r (HMK md. 26). Taleplerin her biri hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 zorunludur (HMK md. 297). Davac\u0131-daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n Z\u0130NA (TMK md. 161) hukuksal nedenine dayal\u0131 bo\u015fanma talebi konusunda da olumlu-olumsuz bir karar verilmesi gerekirken, sadece yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 nedenine dayal\u0131 talebi konusunda karar verilmesi isabetsiz oldu\u011fundan, say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun bozma gerek\u00e7esine kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n

KAR\u015eI OY YAZISI<\/p>\n

Erkek e\u015f taraf\u0131ndan “iki ayr\u0131 sebeple” , “tek bo\u015fanma davas\u0131” a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda de\u011ferli \u00e7o\u011funluk ile aram\u0131zda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f birli\u011fi vard\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yerel mahkeme erkek e\u015fin zina sebebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda olumlu-olumsuz bir karar vermemi\u015f olmakla h\u00fckm\u00fcn “sadece bu sebeple” bozulmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n

De\u011ferli \u00e7o\u011funluk zina iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda olumlu ya da olumsuz bir karar verilmedi\u011fi halde yerel mahkeme yerine ge\u00e7erek zina vak\u0131as\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi konusunda delil de\u011ferlendirmesi yaparak “zina vard\u0131r” \u015feklinde vak\u0131a belirlemesi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n g\u00f6revi yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 denetlemektir. Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n, hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmayan bir dava i\u00e7in delil de\u011ferlendirmesi yapma yetkisi yoktur. Farkl\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyorum.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 25.06.2013 tarihli 2012\/16833 Esas 2013\/17864 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/16833 E., 2013\/17864 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Konya 3. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 :26.04.2012 NUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/668 Karar no:2012\/507 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan; her iki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilerek; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilmekle; duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 25.06.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebligata ra\u011fmen taraflar ad\u0131na kimse gelmedi. \u0130\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan zina hukuki nedeni (TMK md. 161) ve evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1), daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n) taraf\u0131ndan ise evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talep edilmi\u015f, mahkemece her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 166\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve toplanan delillerden; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n)’\u0131n 16.07.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fc ortak konuta erkek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fahs\u0131n banyoda yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenmi\u015f halde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu vak\u0131a mahkemece de sabit kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Kad\u0131n\u0131n, yaln\u0131zken bir ba\u015fka erke\u011fi ortak konuta almas\u0131 ve bu \u015fahs\u0131n yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenirken yakalanmas\u0131 zinan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na delalet eder. Bu bak\u0131mdan zina kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n zina sebebiyle kabul\u00fc gerekirken, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/16833 E., 2013\/17864 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Konya 3. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 :26.04.2012 NUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/668 Karar no:2012\/507 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan; her iki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilerek; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilmekle; duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 25.06.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebligata ra\u011fmen taraflar ad\u0131na kimse gelmedi. \u0130\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan zina hukuki nedeni (TMK md. 161) ve evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1), daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n) taraf\u0131ndan ise evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talep edilmi\u015f, mahkemece her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 166\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve toplanan delillerden; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n)’\u0131n 16.07.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fc ortak konuta erkek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fahs\u0131n banyoda yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenmi\u015f halde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu vak\u0131a mahkemece de sabit kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Kad\u0131n\u0131n, yaln\u0131zken bir ba\u015fka erke\u011fi ortak konuta almas\u0131 ve bu \u015fahs\u0131n yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenirken yakalanmas\u0131 zinan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na delalet eder. Bu bak\u0131mdan zina kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n zina sebebiyle kabul\u00fc gerekirken, …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-07T09:51:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0438\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-07T09:51:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":724,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-07T09:51:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/16833 E., 2013\/17864 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Konya 3. Aile Mahkemesi TAR\u0130H\u0130 :26.04.2012 NUMARASI :Esas no:2010\/668 Karar no:2012\/507 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n yap\u0131lan muhakemesi sonunda mahalli mahkemece verilen, yukar\u0131da tarihi ve numaras\u0131 g\u00f6sterilen h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131-daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan; her iki bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden temyiz edilerek; temyiz incelemesinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 istenilmekle; duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 25.06.2013 g\u00fcn\u00fc tebligata ra\u011fmen taraflar ad\u0131na kimse gelmedi. \u0130\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in duru\u015fmadan sonraya b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 uygun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Bug\u00fcn dosyadaki b\u00fct\u00fcn ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 (koca) taraf\u0131ndan zina hukuki nedeni (TMK md. 161) ve evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1), daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n) taraf\u0131ndan ise evlilik birli\u011finin temelinden sars\u0131lmas\u0131 sebebine (TMK md. 166\/1) dayal\u0131 olarak bo\u015fanma talep edilmi\u015f, mahkemece her iki davan\u0131n da kabul\u00fc ile T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 166\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca bo\u015fanmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma ve toplanan delillerden; daval\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 (kad\u0131n)’\u0131n 16.07.2010 g\u00fcn\u00fc ortak konuta erkek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fahs\u0131n banyoda yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenmi\u015f halde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu vak\u0131a mahkemece de sabit kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Kad\u0131n\u0131n, yaln\u0131zken bir ba\u015fka erke\u011fi ortak konuta almas\u0131 ve bu \u015fahs\u0131n yar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131plak vaziyette gizlenirken yakalanmas\u0131 zinan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na delalet eder. Bu bak\u0131mdan zina kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131-kar\u015f\u0131 daval\u0131 kocan\u0131n bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n zina sebebiyle kabul\u00fc gerekirken, …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-04-07T09:51:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"4 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\u0438"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-04-07T09:51:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":724,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-07T09:51:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-2-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-16833-e-2013-17864-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 2. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 2012\/16833 E. 2013\/17864 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}