T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/p>\n
13. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n
2014\/43355 E., 2015\/5075 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 : Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne k\u0131smen reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 … avukat\u0131nca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131, galerici olan daval\u0131 \u015firketten sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 nedeni ile ar\u0131zaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, gizli ay\u0131pla arac\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f bedelinin \u00f6detilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131lar, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
1-4822 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fik 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 3.maddesinde, kanunun uygulanmas\u0131yla ilgili tan\u0131mlar yap\u0131l\u0131p, bu arada \u201cAl\u0131\u015fveri\u015fe konu olan ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r e\u015fyay\u0131…\u201d mal, \u201cBir mal veya hizmeti ticari veya mesleki olmayan ama\u00e7larla edinen, kullanan veya yararlanan ger\u00e7ek yada t\u00fczel ki\u015fiyi\u201d t\u00fcketici, \u201ckamu t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri de dahil olmak \u00fczere, ticari veya mesleki faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda t\u00fcketiciye mal sunan ger\u00e7ek veya t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri\u201d sat\u0131c\u0131 olarak, tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 23. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise, \u201cBu kanunun uygulanmas\u0131yla ilgili \u00e7\u0131kacak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ihtilaflara t\u00fcketici mahkemelerinde bak\u0131l\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcyle, kanunun uygulanmas\u0131ndan do\u011facak ihtilaflara bakacak g\u00f6revli mahkeme belirtilmi\u015ftir.
\nBir hukuki i\u015flemin 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yasan\u0131n amac\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde yukar\u0131da tan\u0131mlar\u0131 verilen taraflar aras\u0131nda mal ve hizmet sat\u0131\u015f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir hukuki i\u015flemin olmas\u0131 gerekir. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta daval\u0131n\u0131n (sat\u0131c\u0131) davac\u0131ya (al\u0131c\u0131) ara\u00e7 satt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve taraflar aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Arac\u0131n ikinci el ara\u00e7 olmas\u0131n\u0131n sonuca etkisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, TKHK nun 4\/3 maddesine g\u00f6re; \u0130malat\u00e7\u0131-\u00fcretici, sat\u0131c\u0131, bayi, acente, ithalat\u00e7\u0131 ay\u0131pl\u0131 maldan ve t\u00fcketicinin bu maddede yer alan se\u00e7imlik haklar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 m\u00fcteselsilen sorumlu oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde sat\u0131c\u0131 ve \u00fcretici -ithalat\u00e7\u0131 daval\u0131lara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan eldeki davada 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 23. maddesi gere\u011fince davaya bakmaya T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi g\u00f6revlidir. Mahkemece g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirir.<\/p>\n
2-Bozma nedenine g\u00f6re, taraflar\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine \u015fimdilik gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Birinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, temyiz edilen karar\u0131n taraflar yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, ikinci bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, taraflar\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde iadesine, 19.02.2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 13. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 19\/02\/2015 Tarihli 2014\/43355 Esas 2015\/5075 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 13. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/43355 E., 2015\/5075 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki alacak davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda ilamda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne k\u0131smen reddine y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131 … avukat\u0131nca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc. KARAR Davac\u0131, galerici olan daval\u0131 \u015firketten sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 arac\u0131n \u00fcretim hatas\u0131 nedeni ile ar\u0131zaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, gizli ay\u0131pla arac\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f bedelinin \u00f6detilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131lar, davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131 ve daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-4822 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun ile de\u011fi\u015fik 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun 3.maddesinde, kanunun uygulanmas\u0131yla ilgili tan\u0131mlar yap\u0131l\u0131p, bu arada \u201cAl\u0131\u015fveri\u015fe konu olan ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r e\u015fyay\u0131…\u201d mal, \u201cBir mal veya hizmeti ticari veya mesleki olmayan ama\u00e7larla edinen, kullanan veya yararlanan ger\u00e7ek yada t\u00fczel ki\u015fiyi\u201d t\u00fcketici, \u201ckamu t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri de dahil olmak \u00fczere, ticari veya mesleki faaliyetleri kapsam\u0131nda t\u00fcketiciye mal sunan ger\u00e7ek veya t\u00fczel ki\u015fileri\u201d sat\u0131c\u0131 olarak, tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 23. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise, \u201cBu kanunun uygulanmas\u0131yla ilgili \u00e7\u0131kacak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc ihtilaflara t\u00fcketici mahkemelerinde bak\u0131l\u0131r\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcyle, kanunun uygulanmas\u0131ndan do\u011facak ihtilaflara bakacak g\u00f6revli mahkeme belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bir hukuki i\u015flemin 4077 say\u0131l\u0131 yasa kapsam\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilmesi i\u00e7in yasan\u0131n amac\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde yukar\u0131da tan\u0131mlar\u0131 verilen …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48073","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n