T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
1. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2022\/3078 E., 2024\/1684 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
SU\u00c7 : Olas\u0131 kast ile \u00f6ld\u00fcrme
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahk\u00fbmiyet
\nTEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Bozma
\n\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun (5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un) 286 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, 260 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 291 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, 294 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz sebeplerine yer verildi\u011fi, 298 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme talebinin, 7079 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 94 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 299 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi takd\u00eeren reddine karar verilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/p>\n
1. \u00c7orum 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 23.09.2016 tarihli ve 2016\/125 Esas, 2016\/201 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun (5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 85 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 22 nci maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131, 62 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. … B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Ceza Dairesinin, 18.09.2019 tarihli ve 2018\/549 Esas ve 2019\/2153 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince kurulan h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilerek 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 280 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (g) bendi uyar\u0131nca duru\u015fmal\u0131 yap\u0131lan inceleme neticesinde ayn\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 280 … maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda olas\u0131 kast ile \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 81 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 21 … maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 62 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ve 53 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 16 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunluklar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. TEMY\u0130Z SEBEPLER\u0130<\/p>\n
San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz sebepleri \u00f6zetle; eylemin taksirle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
Temyizin kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re;
\nA. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin Kabul\u00fc
\n1.San\u0131k ile maktul\u00fcn olaydan yakla\u015f\u0131k 6 y\u0131l \u00f6ncesinden bu yana yak\u0131n arkada\u015f olduklar\u0131, maktul ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile birlikte 3-4 g\u00fcn s\u00fcren … gezisi yaparak Karg\u0131’ya d\u00f6nd\u00fckleri, bu tarihten bir g\u00fcn sonra san\u0131k ve maktul ile arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n mesajla\u015farak bulu\u015fmaya karar verdikleri, olay ak\u015fam\u0131 maktul ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131 ile birlikte restaurantta alkoll\u00fc i\u00e7ki i\u00e7tikten sonra maktul …, san\u0131k …, tan\u0131klar … ve…’in birlikte san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f yerine geldikleri, …’in k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra bu i\u015fyerinden ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k ve arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fyerine gelmelerinden bir s\u00fcre sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, tan\u0131k …’i i\u015fyerine \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, burada da san\u0131k, maktul ve arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n alkol almaya devam ettikleri, maktul\u00fcn arkada\u015flar\u0131na \u015faka ama\u00e7l\u0131 video g\u00f6ndermek istedi\u011fi, bu video daha e\u011flenceli ve komik olsun diyerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f yerinde bulunan babas\u0131na ait ruhsatl\u0131 av t\u00fcfe\u011fini yerinden alarak maktul ve arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu yere getirdi\u011fi, \u00f6nce maktul\u00fcn t\u00fcfe\u011fi san\u0131\u011fa do\u011frultarak ate\u015f ediyormu\u015f gibi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonra san\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcfe\u011fi eline al\u0131p maktule do\u011frultarak \u015faka ama\u00e7l\u0131 bir tak\u0131m s\u00f6zler s\u00f6yledi\u011fi s\u0131rada av t\u00fcfe\u011finin kurma kolunu \u00e7ekip b\u0131rakt\u0131ktan sonra teti\u011fe bast\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, maktul\u00fcn 11.05.2016 tarihli otopsi raporunda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere av t\u00fcfe\u011fi sa\u00e7ma taneleri toplu giri\u015f yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u00e7 organ harabiyetinden geli\u015fen i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f kanama sonucu \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2.San\u0131k savunmalar\u0131, tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131 ile olay yeri inceleme raporu, olay yeri basit krokisi, uzmanl\u0131k raporlar\u0131, bilirki\u015fi raporu, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc inceleme tutanaklar\u0131 ve di\u011fer tutanaklar\u0131n dava dosyas\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin Kabul\u00fc
\nAt\u0131\u015f mesafesi, kullan\u0131lan silah\u0131n niteli\u011fi, elveri\u015flili\u011fi ve etki alan\u0131, cep telefonu ve g\u00fcvenlik kameras\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri ve dosyadaki kan\u0131tlar g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, birden fazla ki\u015finin bir arada oldu\u011fu ve alkoll\u00fc olduklar\u0131, yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 g\u00fcn \u00f6nce t\u00fcfek ile at\u0131\u015f yapan, t\u00fcfe\u011fin tutukluluk yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n do\u011frudan \u00f6ld\u00fcrme veya yaralama kast\u0131 ile hareket etmedi\u011fi, ancak elindeki elveri\u015fli silahla ve silah\u0131n etki alan\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde d\u00fckkan\u0131n i\u00e7erisinde birden fazla ki\u015finin bulundu\u011fu, olay yerinde bulunan tan\u0131klar\u0131n uyar\u0131s\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u015farj\u00f6r\u00fc tak\u0131l\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fi doldur-bo\u015falt yap\u0131p kurmak suretiyle at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r hale getirerek maktule do\u011frultup bir el ate\u015f ederek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne sebebiyet verdi\u011fi, bu nedenle ate\u015f etmek suretiyle \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi g\u00f6ze al\u0131p kabullendi\u011fi, bunun sonucunda da maktul\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011fu olayda, eyleminin, \u201colas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme\u201d su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, yerel mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn kald\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
1.Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin us\u00fbl ve kanuna uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n toplanan ve dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re yeterli oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan delillerle birlikte gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan ve reddedilen delillerin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi, vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, mevcut delillerin mahkemece de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, adil yarg\u0131lanma ve savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz sebeplerinin incelenmesinde bozma nedeni d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2.Su\u00e7 niteli\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
\nDosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; san\u0131k ile maktul\u00fcn … s\u00fcredir yak\u0131n arkada\u015f olduklar\u0131 ve aralar\u0131nda husumet bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc taraflar\u0131n \u015faka ama\u00e7l\u0131 video \u00e7ekmek i\u00e7in san\u0131\u011f\u0131n babas\u0131na ait d\u00fckkanda bulunan av t\u00fcfe\u011finin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan getirilmesi \u00fczerine tan\u0131klar … ve Fahri ‘nin beyanlar\u0131 ile de sabit oldu\u011fu \u00fczere maktul\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n elinden t\u00fcfe\u011fi alarak d\u00fckkan\u0131n tavan\u0131na do\u011frultup bir kez teti\u011fe bast\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcfe\u011fin patlamamas\u0131 \u00fczerine bo\u015f oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile san\u0131ktan video \u00e7ekmesini isteyerek t\u00fcfe\u011fi san\u0131\u011fa do\u011frultarak ate\u015f eder gibi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak teti\u011fe basmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu kez san\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcfe\u011fi maktule do\u011frultarak t\u00fcfe\u011fin kurma kolunu \u00e7ekerek \u015faka ama\u00e7l\u0131 teti\u011fe bast\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve t\u00fcfekten \u00e7\u0131kan merminin isabeti sonucu maktul\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne sebebiyet verdi\u011fi olayda; san\u0131k ile maktul aras\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcrme ya da yaralamay\u0131 gerektirir bir nedenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00e7ok k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce maktul\u00fcn teti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmesine ra\u011fmen t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f almad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi ve yak\u0131n bir zamanda t\u00fcfekle deneme at\u0131\u015flar\u0131 yapmas\u0131 nedeniyle bo\u015f oldu\u011funa inanarak i\u00e7ini kontrol etmeden t\u00fcfe\u011fin kurma kolunu \u00e7ekerek teti\u011fe bast\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada t\u00fcfe\u011fin bo\u015f oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 inanc\u0131 ile \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmeyece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile hareket ederek neticeyi istemedi\u011fi gibi eylemi ile do\u011fabilecek her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kanuni sonucu da kabullenmedi\u011fi, ancak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi hareketin \u00f6l\u00fcm sonucunu do\u011furabilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen kendisinden beklenen dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 davranarak t\u00fcfe\u011fin i\u00e7ini kontrol etmeden teti\u011fe bast\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 85 … maddesinin birinci ve 22 nci maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca bilin\u00e7li taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde olas\u0131 kastla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
V. KARAR<\/p>\n
Gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde (2) numaral\u0131 bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz istemi su\u00e7 niteli\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden … B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Ceza Dairesinin, 18.09.2019 tarihli ve 2018\/549 Esas ve 2019\/2153 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 302 nci maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi, Tebli\u011fname\u2019ye uygun olarak, oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
Dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 304 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca takd\u00eeren … B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 3. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
13.03.2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
K A R \u015e I O Y<\/p>\n
Maktul …’in \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi olay\u0131nda yerel mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksirle adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan verilen mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi Ceza Dairesi taraf\u0131ndan kald\u0131r\u0131larak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin olas\u0131 kastla adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015f bu karar\u0131n temyizi \u00fczerine dairemizce san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilerek B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 bozulmu\u015f olup dairemizin \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin olas\u0131 kastla adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kanaatinde oldu\u011fumdan muhalifim. \u015e\u00f6yle ki;<\/p>\n
San\u0131k … ile maktul … arkada\u015f olup olaydan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce ortak arkada\u015flar\u0131 olan … , … ile birlikte … turuna \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p geri d\u00f6nm\u00fc\u015fler ve olay ak\u015fam da hep birlikte \u00f6nce … bara giderek alkol al\u0131p e\u011flenmi\u015fler sonra da san\u0131\u011fa ait in\u015faat malzemesi sat\u0131lan i\u015f yerine gelerek burada hep birlikte alkol almaya devam etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k olaydan yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 g\u00fcn kadar \u00f6nce sat\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fi ile arkada\u015f\u0131 …’i aray\u0131p birlikte at\u0131\u015f yapmay\u0131 teklif etmi\u015f ve bu t\u00fcfek ile birlikte \u0131ss\u0131z bir yere giderek kendisi t\u00fcfe\u011fin \u015farj\u00f6r\u00fcne bast\u0131\u011f\u0131 fi\u015fekleri s\u0131kmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f, t\u00fcfek tutukluk yap\u0131nca tekrar t\u00fcfekle oynam\u0131\u015f birka\u00e7 el havaya ate\u015f etmi\u015f daha sonra da arkada\u015f\u0131 tan\u0131k …’in t\u00fcfe\u011fi kontrol et demesi \u00fczerine kurma kolunu \u00e7ekip b\u0131rakarak tekrar havaya ate\u015f etmek suretiyle t\u00fcfe\u011fini kontrol edip oradan birlikte ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015flar, san\u0131k gelerek yeni ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fini d\u00fckkan\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu yere geri koymu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Her ne kadar san\u0131k s\u00f6z konusu hem d\u00fckkan\u0131n ve hem de t\u00fcfe\u011fin kendisine ait olmay\u0131p babas\u0131na ait oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemi\u015f ise de dosya kapsam\u0131 ve delil durumuna g\u00f6re su\u00e7 tarihinde evli ve \u00e7ocuklu olan 31 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hem in\u015faat malzemesi satan d\u00fckkan\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 hem de ilgili t\u00fcfe\u011fi kendisinin sat\u0131n al\u0131p kendisine ait oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Olay tarihinden bir s\u00fcre \u00f6nce kullan\u0131p tekrar kutusuna b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fini olay g\u00fcn\u00fc alkoll\u00fc \u015fekilde getirerek arkada\u015flar\u0131na sosyal medyada payla\u015fmak i\u00e7in \u015faka ama\u00e7l\u0131 video \u00e7ekerken g\u00f6stermi\u015f, dosyadaki kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na g\u00f6re t\u00fcfe\u011fi \u00f6nce maktul alarak ate\u015f eder gibi yap\u0131p san\u0131\u011fa do\u011frultmu\u015f ve poz vermi\u015f sonra da maktulden t\u00fcfe\u011fi alan san\u0131k t\u00fcfe\u011fi eline ald\u0131ktan sonra doldur bo\u015falt yaparak yak\u0131n mesafeden bir el maktule ate\u015f etmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan at\u0131\u015f sonucu maktul hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetmi\u015ftir. Kamera g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri dosyada mevcuttur.<\/p>\n
Her ne kadar san\u0131k ile maktul aras\u0131nda \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeyi gerektirir bir husumet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, taraflar\u0131n arkada\u015f olup e\u011flenme ama\u00e7l\u0131 alkol al\u0131p video \u00e7ekimi yapt\u0131klar\u0131 sabit ise de san\u0131\u011f\u0131n en son kendisinin kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u015farj\u00f6r\u00fcne fi\u015fek bast\u0131\u011f\u0131 kendisine ait t\u00fcfe\u011fi koydu\u011fu yerden al\u0131p \u00f6nce maktule verdi\u011fi sonras\u0131nda da ondan alarak t\u00fcfe\u011fin kurma kolunu \u00e7ekip yak\u0131n mesafedeki maktule ate\u015f etti\u011fi o s\u0131rada kay\u0131tl\u0131 olan kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
San\u0131\u011f\u0131n maktul\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrme y\u00f6n\u00fcnde herhangi bir iradesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r ancak kendisinin en son kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fini maktule do\u011frultarak doldur bo\u015falt yap\u0131p teti\u011fi \u00e7ekti\u011finde t\u00fcfe\u011fin dolu olabilece\u011fi ve yap\u0131lacak at\u0131\u015fla kar\u015f\u0131daki ki\u015filerden birinin \u00f6lebilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesi ve yine daha \u00f6nceden kendisinin i\u00e7ine koyup unuttu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan fi\u015fe\u011fi kurma kolunu kurmak suretiyle namluya verip ate\u015f etmesi olay\u0131nda olay\u0131n olu\u015f \u015fekli bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n t\u00fcfekte fi\u015fek olabilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve ancak alkol\u00fcn etkisi ile kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131ndaki insanlara do\u011frultup kurma kolunu \u00e7ekip teti\u011fe basarak olabilecek sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 kabullendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemi olas\u0131 kast ile adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturmakta olup B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekirken bozulmas\u0131na dair Dairemizin \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.
\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi’nin 13.03.2024 tarihli 2022\/3078 E. ve 2024\/1684 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi 2022\/3078 E., 2024\/1684 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ceza Dairesi SU\u00c7 : Olas\u0131 kast ile \u00f6ld\u00fcrme H\u00dcK\u00dcM : Mahk\u00fbmiyet TEBL\u0130\u011eNAME G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dc : Bozma \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckme y\u00f6nelik istinaf incelemesi \u00fczerine B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan verilen karar\u0131n; 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun (5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un) 286 nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilebilir oldu\u011fu, 260 \u0131nc\u0131 maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz edenin h\u00fckm\u00fc temyize hak ve yetkisinin bulundu\u011fu, 291 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu, 294 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde temyiz sebeplerine yer verildi\u011fi, 298 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi temyiz isteminin reddini gerektirir bir durumun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme neticesinde tespit edilmi\u015ftir. San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fmal\u0131 inceleme talebinin, 7079 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 94 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 299 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi takd\u00eeren reddine karar verilmekle, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7 1. \u00c7orum 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin, 23.09.2016 tarihli ve 2016\/125 Esas, 2016\/201 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksirle \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun (5237 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 85 … maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131, 22 nci maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131, 62 nci maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n