T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/p>\n
1. Hukuk Dairesi <\/p>\n
2014\/18786 E. \u00a0, \u00a02016\/7575 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130: ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, tahliye ve ecrimisil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …’\u0131n raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc;<\/p>\n
-KARAR-<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131, payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 27 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde in\u015fa edilen binada kendisinin malik oldu\u011fu dairenin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fgal edilerek kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ecrimisil de \u00f6denmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahalesinin men’i, tahliyesi ve 25.000 TL ecrimisilin tahsili ile kendisine \u00f6denmesi istemiyle eldeki davay\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131, payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ile davac\u0131n\u0131n payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 27 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerine tevhid edilmeksizin bir bina yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n maliki oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi dairenin kendisi taraf\u0131ndan sat\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 malik s\u0131fat\u0131 ile kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, her ne kadar dava konusu daire 27 nolu parsel \u00fczerinde kalsa da parseller tevhit edilmeksizin \u00fczerlerine ortak bir bina yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, binan\u0131n imara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ka\u00e7ak oldu\u011fu tapu kayd\u0131nda arsa vas\u0131fl\u0131 ve hisseli olan dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda fiili bir taksimden de bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, daval\u0131n\u0131n da m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak bu yeri kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve haks\u0131z kullan\u0131mdan ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetten s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, intifadan men ko\u015fulunun da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi ayr\u0131ca m\u00fc\u015fterek m\u00fclkiyet kurallar\u0131 gere\u011fi davac\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer tapu maliklerinin r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 almadan b\u00f6yle bir dava da a\u00e7amayaca\u011f\u0131ndan yasal \u015fartlar\u0131n olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Hemen belirtmek gerekir ki; TMK 693\/son maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc uyar\u0131nca payda\u015flardan her biri b\u00f6l\u00fcnemeyen ortak menfaatlerin korumas\u0131n\u0131 di\u011fer payda\u015flar\u0131 temsilen sa\u011flayabilir. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle bir veya birka\u00e7 payda\u015f\u0131n bu t\u00fcrl\u00fc davalarda di\u011fer payda\u015flar\u0131 temsile yetkili bulundu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k olup, davac\u0131n\u0131n tek ba\u015f\u0131na di\u011fer payda\u015flar\u0131 temsilen dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan davac\u0131 27 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz payda\u015f\u0131, daval\u0131 ise 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz payda\u015f\u0131 olup, \u00e7eki\u015fme konusu 27 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazda daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetten veya s\u00f6zle\u015fmeden kaynaklanan korunacak yasal bir hakk\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan intifadan men ko\u015fulunun aranmayaca\u011f\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet iddias\u0131n\u0131n dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaza ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu ve 21\/06\/1994 tarih, 13\/24 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek davac\u0131 payda\u015f\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi davas\u0131n\u0131n, m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131ndan kaynaklanan ayni hakk\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131nmak suretiyle elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi iste\u011finin ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden kabul edilmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n
H\u00e2l b\u00f6yle olunca; her ne kadar dava konusu 27 parsel ve dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar tevhid edilmeksizin \u00fczerine tek bir bina yap\u0131larak m\u00fc\u015fterek bir durum yarat\u0131lm\u0131\u015fsa da kayden ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar birbirinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup, dosyada mevcut bilirki\u015fi raporu ile de tespit edildi\u011fi \u00fczere daval\u0131n\u0131n kullanmakta oldu\u011fu dairenin 27 parsel s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7inde kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek, davac\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fck tan\u0131narak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u00fczere davan\u0131n reddine dair h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerindedir. Kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn belirtilen nedenlerden \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc, (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 3.maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile) 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK’un 428.maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA, al\u0131nan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n temyiz edene geri verilmesine, 23.06.2016 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.
\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 1. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 23.6.2016 tarihli 2014\/18786 E., 2016\/7575 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 1. Hukuk Dairesi 2014\/18786 E. \u00a0, \u00a02016\/7575 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130: ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen elatman\u0131n \u00f6nlenmesi, tahliye ve ecrimisil davas\u0131 sonunda, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin olarak verilen karar davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde temyiz edilmi\u015f olmakla dosya incelendi, Tetkik Hakimi …’\u0131n raporu okundu, a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc; -KARAR- Davac\u0131, payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 27 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerinde in\u015fa edilen binada kendisinin malik oldu\u011fu dairenin daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan i\u015fgal edilerek kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ecrimisil de \u00f6denmedi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla daval\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdahalesinin men’i, tahliyesi ve 25.000 TL ecrimisilin tahsili ile kendisine \u00f6denmesi istemiyle eldeki davay\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131, payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 26 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ile davac\u0131n\u0131n payda\u015f oldu\u011fu 27 parsel say\u0131l\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz \u00fczerine tevhid edilmeksizin bir bina yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve davac\u0131n\u0131n maliki oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi dairenin kendisi taraf\u0131ndan sat\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 malik s\u0131fat\u0131 ile kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek davan\u0131n reddini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, her ne kadar dava konusu daire 27 nolu parsel \u00fczerinde kalsa da parseller tevhit edilmeksizin \u00fczerlerine ortak bir bina yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, binan\u0131n imara uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ka\u00e7ak oldu\u011fu tapu kayd\u0131nda arsa vas\u0131fl\u0131 ve hisseli olan dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazda fiili bir taksimden de bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, daval\u0131n\u0131n da m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak bu yeri kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve haks\u0131z kullan\u0131mdan ve k\u00f6t\u00fc niyetten s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fi, intifadan men …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n