T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
N. B. BA\u015eVURUSU (4)<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21328)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 protesto eden ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc kabahatinden idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin haks\u0131z tutmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde memur olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken 23\/1\/2017 tarihli ve 683 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (KHK) ile kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 22\/7\/2021 tarihinde, bir siyasi partinin il ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde kamu g\u00f6revinden haks\u0131z \u015fekilde ihra\u00e7 edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik bir konu\u015fma yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklara g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, yan\u0131nda bir \u015fah\u0131sla birlikte bir siyasi parti il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcndeki kald\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 k\u0131smen yaya trafi\u011fine kapatarak izinsiz eylem yapmak istemi\u015ftir. Polisin eylem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ihtar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucu, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin konu\u015fmay\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131rmak suretiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f; di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131s ise cep telefonuyla olay\u0131 kaydetmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olayla ilgili sadece idari y\u00f6nden i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine polis, her iki \u015fahs\u0131 sa\u011fl\u0131k raporu d\u00fczenlenmesi i\u00e7in hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f; ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 30\/3\/2005 tarihli ve 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanun’un 36. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 204 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, uzun s\u00fcredir i\u015fsiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle parti il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde k\u0131sa bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 resm\u00ee makamlara yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir \u015fik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, konu\u015fman\u0131n g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcye neden oldu\u011funa dair herhangi bir tespitin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek idari para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi 31\/1\/2022 tarihinde, uygulanan idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmadan yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz da benzer gerek\u00e7eyle 11\/2\/2022 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 23\/2\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 28\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir (Mehmet \u015eerif Ay, B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013 \u00a7\u00a7 22-26).<\/p>\n
A. \u0130fade \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 sorumlu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc siyasi partinin il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmas\u0131 sonucu hakk\u0131nda yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurusunun gerek\u00e7esiz \u015fekilde reddedilmesi nedenleriyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, konu\u015fman\u0131n cep telefonu ile kayd\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi nedeniyle de haberle\u015fme h\u00fcrriyetinin ihlal edildi\u011finden \u015fik\u00e2yet etmi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn mutlak olmay\u0131p s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131labilir nitelikte oldu\u011fu vurgulanarak Anayasa Mahkemesinin at\u0131f yap\u0131lan i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda de\u011ferlendirme yapmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki hususlar\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru, olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klama nedeniyle idari para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olup bireysel ba\u015fvuru formu ve ekli belgelerde eylemin kolektif olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fine dair bir bilgi de olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011fil ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir. 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 36. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlama sebeplerinden kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu belirlemenin ard\u0131ndan demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygunluk y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi daha \u00f6nce bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda; bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l bir eylem nedeniyle idarece verilen idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n temel hakka y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale oldu\u011funu (ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ba\u011flam\u0131nda bkz. Nursel Tanr\u0131verdi, B. No: 2020\/26374, 4\/7\/2022, \u00a7 22; Engin Karata\u015f, B. No: 2018\/3488, 13\/9\/2022, \u00a7 11; T\u00fcrkan Albayrak, B. No: 2019\/1628, 28\/12\/2021, \u00a7\u00a725, 26; toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda bkz. Dursun Soydan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/2948, 14\/11\/2018, \u00a7 39; Song\u00fcl Eri\u015f ve Bedriye Ku\u015f, B. No: 2020\/38552, 30\/3\/2022, \u00a7 28; Canan Y\u00fcce ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2020\/37789, 4\/7\/2022, \u00a7 24) ve idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc kullanan ki\u015filerde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 etki do\u011furabilece\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir (\u0130lyas Bulcay, B. No: 2020\/24527, 9\/2\/2023, \u00a7 39; \u0130lker Erdo\u011fan, B. No: 2013\/316, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 57; farkl\u0131 ba\u011flamda benzer de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Halil Cihan \u00d6zbilen ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2020\/5038, 16\/3\/2023, \u00a7 36). Bu nedenle Anayasa Mahkemesi -somut olayda oldu\u011fu gibi- ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde eylem nedeniyle kamu d\u00fczeninin bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bozulma tehlikesinin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ya da b\u00f6yle bir tehlikenin ortaya \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir (Mahmut Konuk (2), B. No: 2021\/21730, 15\/11\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 42-48; Engin Karata\u015f, B. No: 2018\/3488, 13\/9\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 16-19; farkl\u0131 ba\u011flamda benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Halil Cihan \u00d6zbilen ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 39-49; Song\u00fcl Eri\u015f ve Bedriye Ku\u015f, \u00a7 49; R\u0131za G\u00f6k\u00e7en Erus ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/17391, 19\/4\/2018, \u00a7 63). Ayr\u0131ca temel hakka m\u00fcdahaleyi hakl\u0131 k\u0131lacak me\u015fru gerek\u00e7e ile \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck de\u011ferleri aras\u0131nda kurulan adil dengenin kamu g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fc kullanan yetkili mercilerin kararlar\u0131nda ortaya konulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. Dilan \u00d6g\u00fcz Canan [GK], B. No: 2014\/20411, 30\/11\/2017 \u00a7\u00a7 51, 53; Song\u00fcl Eri\u015f ve Bedriye Ku\u015f, \u00a7\u00a7 49, 50; Z\u00fclk\u00fcf Y\u0131ld\u0131z ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/35399, 16\/3\/2022, \u00a7 53; \u0130smail Sar\u0131kabaday\u0131 ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2016\/23696, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 45).Nitekim kamu d\u00fczeninin bozuldu\u011funun ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile g\u00f6sterilemedi\u011fi, temel haklara m\u00fcdahalenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi her kamu g\u00fcc\u00fc eylem ve i\u015flem; temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri ihlal edebilir (Cengiz F\u0131rat ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2019\/36358, 10\/5\/2022, \u00a7 52).<\/p>\n
13. \u0130ki ki\u015finin bulundu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun konu\u015fma yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 eylemde, g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc kabahati i\u015flendi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 36. maddesi uyar\u0131nca idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. M\u00fcdahaleye dayanak kanuni d\u00fczenlemede, ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n huzur ve s\u00fck\u00fbnetini bozacak \u015fekilde g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcye neden olan ki\u015finin g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc kabahati dolay\u0131s\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcye ili\u015fkin ulusal mevzuatta yer alan farkl\u0131 d\u00fczenleme ve de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Kamil Tatl\u0131c\u0131, B. No: 2013\/9537, 25\/3\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 14, 23).<\/p>\n
14. Somut olaya ili\u015fkin olarak kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklarda, ba\u015fvurucunun ba\u011f\u0131rarak konu\u015fmak suretiyle g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fcye neden oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 3). Tutanaklarda ba\u015fvurucunun eyleminin ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n huzur ve s\u00fckununu bozdu\u011funa veya kamu d\u00fczenini bozucu nitelikte oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin herhangi bir tespit ve de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna ek olarak idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ba\u015fvurusunu inceleyen sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011finin gerek\u00e7esinde de eylemin ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n huzur ve s\u00fckununu ne \u015fekilde bozdu\u011funa a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirilmemi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla herhangi ses y\u00fckseltici cihaz kullanmadan, tek ba\u015f\u0131na konu\u015fma yapan ba\u015fvurucunun ne \u015fekilde ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n huzur ve s\u00fckunetini bozdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Bununla birlikte somut olayda, halka a\u00e7\u0131k yerde yap\u0131lan her eylemin do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayat\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131nda belli bir rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011fa sebep olabilece\u011fi veya g\u00f6sterinin belli bir gerginli\u011fi ve karga\u015fay\u0131 b\u00fcnyesinde ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilmemi\u015ftir (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Eylem Onuk, B. No: 2015\/8018, 15\/11\/2018, \u00a7 51, Dilan \u00d6g\u00fcz Canan, \u00a7 41; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7 119). Nitekim kamu d\u00fczeni ile ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde katlan\u0131lmayacak nitelikte bir zarar ya da zarar tehlikesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l eylemlere kar\u015f\u0131 belli bir oranda sab\u0131r ve ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6stermeleri \u00f6nem arz etmektedir. Yukar\u0131da da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere ba\u015fvuruyu inceleyen h\u00e2kimlik, ba\u015fvuruya konu yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n usul ve kanuna uygun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda m\u00fcdahaleye konu konu\u015fman\u0131n ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n huzur ve s\u00fck\u00fbnetini bozacak nitelikte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmam\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvuru dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen hususlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 4, 5).<\/p>\n
16. Sonu\u00e7 olarak bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l bir protesto kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan konu\u015fma nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun idari para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n idari ve yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131nca ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e ile ortaya konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti Ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun, idari yapt\u0131r\u0131m uygulanaca\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle 18.30 ile 20.55 saatleri aras\u0131nda haks\u0131z tutulmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Fatih \u00d6zb\u00f6l\u00fck (B. No: 2020\/23252, 6\/6\/2024, \u00a7\u00a717-19) karar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ile miktar belirtmeksizin manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019,\u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
21. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 4. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (2021\/5575 D. \u0130\u015f) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 22\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 22\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/21328 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 N. B. BA\u015eVURUSU (4) (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/21328) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 protesto eden ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc kabahatinden idari para cezas\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin haks\u0131z tutmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde memur olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken 23\/1\/2017 tarihli ve 683 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (KHK) ile kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 22\/7\/2021 tarihinde, bir siyasi partinin il ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde kamu g\u00f6revinden haks\u0131z \u015fekilde ihra\u00e7 edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik bir konu\u015fma yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklara g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, yan\u0131nda bir \u015fah\u0131sla birlikte bir siyasi parti il binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcndeki kald\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 k\u0131smen yaya trafi\u011fine kapatarak izinsiz eylem yapmak istemi\u015ftir. Polisin eylem yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ihtar\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucu, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin konu\u015fmay\u0131 ba\u011f\u0131rmak suretiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015f; di\u011fer \u015fah\u0131s ise cep telefonuyla olay\u0131 kaydetmi\u015ftir. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n olayla ilgili sadece idari y\u00f6nden i\u015flem yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine polis, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36497","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n