T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
SELAHATT\u0130N \u00d6ZTEK\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/28601)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eehadet \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Selahattin \u00d6ZTEK\u0130N<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Rojhar EROL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, a\u011f\u0131r nitelikli yaralama olay\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u00c7anakkale Onsekiz Mart \u00dcniversitesinde \u00f6\u011frenci olan ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131f arkada\u015f\u0131 C.A. ile husumeti bulunmaktad\u0131r. 17\/11\/2014 tarihinde s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n giri\u015finde ba\u015fvurucunun, arkada\u015f\u0131 M.K. ile kucakla\u015f\u0131rken C.A.ya temas etmesi nedeniyle C.A. kendisine omuz at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu ile tart\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucu, arkada\u015flar\u0131 V.T. ve A.U. ile okul \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 evlerine do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcrken C.A. ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 M.K., E.D., Y.E.K. ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015f; aralar\u0131nda arbede ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. C.A., M.K., E.D. ve Y.E.K. taraf\u0131ndan darbedilen ba\u015fvurucu a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu arbede s\u0131ras\u0131nda V.T. ve E.D. de birbirlerini basit nitelikte yaralam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Olay \u00fczerine Biga Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca resen ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmaya su\u00e7 vasf\u0131 nedeniyle yaz\u0131lan fezleke \u00fczerine \u00c7anakkale Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) devam edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Adli T\u0131p Kurumu \u00c7anakkale Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 18\/2\/2015 tarihli raporda ba\u015fvurucun yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye soktu\u011fu, kafa ve y\u00fcz kemiklerinde tespit edilen k\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131n hayat fonksiyonlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u011f\u0131r derecede etkileyecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Olay\u0131n taraflar\u0131 ile tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 alan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, V.T. ve E.D.nin birbirlerine kar\u015f\u0131 eylemleri nedeniyle kasten basit yaralama su\u00e7undan, C.A. M.K., E.D. ve Y.E.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik eylemleri nedeniyle kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 talebiyle 30\/3\/2015 tarihli iddianame ile kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. \u00c7anakkale 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) iddianameyi kabul ederek yarg\u0131lamaya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay\u0131n taraflar\u0131n\u0131 ve tan\u0131klar\u0131 dinleyen Mahkeme, olay an\u0131na ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcler hakk\u0131nda bilirki\u015fi raporu alarak yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 tamamlam\u0131\u015f; 12\/10\/2018 tarihli karar\u0131nda C.A., E.D. ve M.T.nin ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs su\u00e7undan beraatlerine, Y.E.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik de\u011fi\u015fen su\u00e7 niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re nitelikli kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin ayr\u0131ca V.T. ve E.D. hakk\u0131nda birbirlerine kar\u015f\u0131 eylemleri nedeniyle kasten basit yaralama su\u00e7undan verdi\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 kararlar\u0131 itiraz incelemesinden ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Kat\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu vekili ve san\u0131k Y.E.K. m\u00fcdafii, ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik eylemler a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlere kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Bursa B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Ceza Dairesi (\u0130stinaf Dairesi) istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin hukuki niteli\u011fi, olu\u015fturma ihtimali oldu\u011fu su\u00e7 vasf\u0131, verilen ceza miktar\u0131, haks\u0131z tahrik ve derecesi hususlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan davan\u0131n yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda baz\u0131 tan\u0131klar\u0131n yeniden beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurulup san\u0131k savunmalar\u0131 al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucu 14\/2\/2022 tarihinde C.A., M.K., E.D. ve Y.E.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik nitelikli kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Verilen karar\u0131 kat\u0131lan vekili, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafileri ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 temyiz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Temyiz incelemesi sonunda Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi (Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi) 16\/5\/2023 tarihinde \u0130stinaf Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi bozma gerek\u00e7esinde \u0130stinaf Dairesinin istinaf talepleriyle ilgili tek h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini g\u00f6zetmeden kat\u0131lan vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin ba\u015fvurusu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm kurarak kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa neden oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle verilen karar\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Bozma sonras\u0131 \u0130stinaf Dairesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada bozma ilam\u0131 do\u011frultusunda h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131nda d\u00fczeltmeler yap\u0131larak bozma \u00f6ncesi verilen karardaki gibi C.A., M.K., E.D. ve Y.E.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik nitelikli kasten yaralama su\u00e7undan mahk\u00fbmiyetlerine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. \u0130stinaf Dairesince verilen 25\/12\/2023 tarihli mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Dairesinin 22\/10\/2024 tarihli karar\u0131yla onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu 9\/6\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00f6l\u00fcm tehlikesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinden uzun s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mesine ra\u011fmen davan\u0131n hen\u00fcz sonu\u00e7lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, devletin etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmedi\u011fini, uzun s\u00fcren yarg\u0131lama nedeniyle manevi olarak y\u0131prand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yeterince \u00f6zenli ve h\u0131zl\u0131 \u015fekilde tamamlanmayan yarg\u0131lama nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, etkili ba\u015fvuru, ya\u015fam ve makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Olay\u0131n niteli\u011fi ve formdaki iddialar do\u011frultusunda ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin \u00f6z\u00fc ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. O h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvuruda incelenmesi gereken ilk husus ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenip incelenemeyece\u011fidir.<\/p>\n
14. \u00d6l\u00fcm\u00fcn ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi baz\u0131 h\u00e2llerde de ba\u015fvuru; ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn derecesi ile t\u00fcr\u00fc, g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131nda yatan niyet ve ama\u00e7 ile maruz kal\u0131nan eylemin ma\u011fdurun fiziki b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczerindeki sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 gibi hususlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirilerek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilir (Mehmet Karada\u011f, B. No: 2013\/2030, 26\/6\/2014, \u00a7 20; Mustafa \u00c7elik ve Siyahmet \u015eeran, B. No: 2014\/7227, 12\/1\/2017, \u00a7 69; Yasin A\u011fca, B. No: 2014\/13163, 11\/5\/2017, \u00a7 110).<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvuruya konu olayda ba\u015fvurucu, kafas\u0131nda k\u0131r\u0131klar olu\u015facak ve ya\u015famsal tehlike ge\u00e7irecek \u015fekilde yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvurunun ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet, ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in olu\u015fturulan yasal ve idari \u00e7er\u00e7evenin gere\u011fi gibi uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hakka y\u00f6nelik ihlallerin durdurulup cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayacak etkili bir yarg\u0131sal sistem kurmakla da y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheli her \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7\u00a752, 54; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 97).<\/p>\n
18. \u00d6l\u00fcme kasten neden olunmas\u0131 veya \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu meydana gelmesi h\u00e2linde etkili yarg\u0131sal sistem kurma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 hakk\u0131nda ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 55). Bu t\u00fcr bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131 resen harekete ge\u00e7erek \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131n\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmeli, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fctmeli, soru\u015fturma veya sonu\u00e7lar\u0131, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131 ve me\u015fru menfaatlerini korumak i\u00e7in \u00f6len ki\u015finin yak\u0131nlar\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcrecine gerekli oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kat\u0131labilmelidir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 57, 58; Salih Akku\u015f, B. No: 2012\/1017, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 30;Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 99). Bununla birlikte etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir sonu\u00e7 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de\u011fil uygun ara\u00e7lar\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcd\u00fcr. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi ba\u015fvuruculara \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fileri bir su\u00e7 nedeniyle yarg\u0131latma ya da cezaland\u0131rma hakk\u0131 vermedi\u011fi gibi devlete t\u00fcm yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131 mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7land\u0131rma \u00f6devi de y\u00fcklemez (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 56; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 98).<\/p>\n
19. Olas\u0131 cezai sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonras\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f ise bu a\u015fama da Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gereklerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Filiz Aka, B. No: 2013\/8365, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 30; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren, \u00a7 100).<\/p>\n
20. Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde yap\u0131lan i\u015flemler ve ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvuruda incelenmesi gereken mesele, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrat ve \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcl\u00fcp y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fidir.<\/p>\n
21. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi hususu hukuk devletine ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlere ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc ve te\u015fvik g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc verilmesinin engellenmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir gerekliliktir (Salih Akku\u015f, B. No: 2012\/1017, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 30). Soru\u015fturman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin tespit ba\u015fvuruya konu olay\u0131n kendi ko\u015fullar\u0131na, soru\u015fturmadaki \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k say\u0131s\u0131na, su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n niteli\u011fine, olay\u0131n karma\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k derecesine ve soru\u015fturman\u0131n ilerlemesine engel olan unsurlar ya da g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fcklerin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re farkl\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6sterebilecektir (Fahriye Erkek ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/4668, 16\/9\/2015, \u00a7 91).<\/p>\n
22. Somut olaya ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7te ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanmas\u0131 17\/11\/2014 tarihinde meydana gelmi\u015f olup olay hakk\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma be\u015f aydan daha k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcrede tamamlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l alt\u0131 ayda karar verilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinaf Dairesi \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l d\u00f6rt ayda davay\u0131 yeniden g\u00f6rerek karar vermi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay Dairesinin bozma karar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7lanan temyiz s\u00fcreci bir y\u0131l \u00fc\u00e7 ay s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130stinaf Dairesince bozma karar\u0131 sonras\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama yedi ayda tamamlanm\u0131\u015f olup dosyan\u0131n ikinci temyiz s\u00fcreci on ay sonra Yarg\u0131tay Dairesinin 22\/10\/2024 tarihli onama karar\u0131yla sona ermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvuru konusu yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k on y\u0131l s\u00fcrmesinin mahkemelerin i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcnden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla birlikte, incelenen dava ko\u015fullar\u0131nda yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreciyle ilgilihi\u00e7bir unsur yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bu denli uzamas\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 k\u0131lmamaktad\u0131r. Hayati tehlike ge\u00e7irecek \u015fekilde yaralanan ba\u015fvurucunun davan\u0131n h\u0131zla sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131ndaki menfaatinin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00f6zelde ba\u015fvurucunun ve genel olarak da toplumdaki di\u011fer bireylerin hukukun \u00fcst\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne olan ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemlere ho\u015fg\u00f6r\u00fc g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi ya da kay\u0131ts\u0131z kal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc verilmesinin engellenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k on y\u0131l s\u00fcren yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesi talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
26. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya talebi do\u011frultusunda net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 100.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin \u00c7anakkale 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2015\/148, K.2018\/437) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 7\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 7\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/28601 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 SELAHATT\u0130N \u00d6ZTEK\u0130N BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/28601) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 7\/1\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : \u015eehadet \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucu : Selahattin \u00d6ZTEK\u0130N Vekili : Av. Rojhar EROL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, a\u011f\u0131r nitelikli yaralama olay\u0131 hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. \u00c7anakkale Onsekiz Mart \u00dcniversitesinde \u00f6\u011frenci olan ba\u015fvurucunun s\u0131n\u0131f arkada\u015f\u0131 C.A. ile husumeti bulunmaktad\u0131r. 17\/11\/2014 tarihinde s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n giri\u015finde ba\u015fvurucunun, arkada\u015f\u0131 M.K. ile kucakla\u015f\u0131rken C.A.ya temas etmesi nedeniyle C.A. kendisine omuz at\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnm\u00fc\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu ile tart\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucu, arkada\u015flar\u0131 V.T. ve A.U. ile okul \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131 evlerine do\u011fru y\u00fcr\u00fcrken C.A. ve arkada\u015flar\u0131 M.K., E.D., Y.E.K. ile kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015f; aralar\u0131nda arbede ya\u015fanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. C.A., M.K., E.D. ve Y.E.K. taraf\u0131ndan darbedilen ba\u015fvurucu a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu arbede s\u0131ras\u0131nda V.T. ve E.D. de birbirlerini basit nitelikte yaralam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Olay \u00fczerine Biga Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca resen ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmaya su\u00e7 vasf\u0131 nedeniyle yaz\u0131lan fezleke \u00fczerine \u00c7anakkale Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) devam edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Adli T\u0131p Kurumu \u00c7anakkale Adli T\u0131p \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n