T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
M. E.A. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31479)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Resul TEMUR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun evinde arama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu 9\/8\/2019-13\/8\/2019 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
3. Polis memurlar\u0131, arama i\u015flemi nedeniyle 9\/8\/2019 tarihinde (saat 04.40) d\u00fczenledikleri tutanakta ba\u015fvurucunun evinin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun olarak \u00e7ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, defaatle uyarmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen evin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7an kimse olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kap\u0131y\u0131 k\u0131rarak i\u00e7eri girdiklerini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin ellerindeki silahlar\u0131 almaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fini ve direndi\u011fi, bu nedenle bu ki\u015filere kar\u015f\u0131 kademeli olarak g\u00fc\u00e7 kulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Kendilerine zararlar\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorulan ba\u015fvurucu ile di\u011fer iki ki\u015fi, kap\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 haricinde zararlar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Tutana\u011f\u0131n alt\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun imzas\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131n akabinde ilk olarak Selahaddin Eyyubi Devlet Hastanesine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yap\u0131lan muayene sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen 9\/8\/2019 tarihli (saat 06.35) raporda; ba\u015fvurucunun boynunun sa\u011f taraf\u0131 ve sa\u011f kolunun \u00fcst k\u0131sm\u0131nda \u00e7izikler oldu\u011fu, g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs ve s\u0131rt k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ise k\u0131zard\u0131\u011f\u0131, yaralanman\u0131n etkisinin basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif oldu\u011fu ve ba\u015fvurucunun ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131n tehlikeye girmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ayn\u0131 tarihte ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii, ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n orant\u0131s\u0131z m\u00fcdahalede bulunmas\u0131 neticesinde k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek polis memurlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucunun evin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131na f\u0131rsat verilmeden ve kap\u0131 \u00e7al\u0131nmadan kap\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011f kolunda \u00e7ok say\u0131da \u00e7izik oldu\u011funu, g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs ve s\u0131rt k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n tamamen k\u0131zard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, boynunun sa\u011f k\u0131sm\u0131nda belirgin kesikler oldu\u011funu, konu\u015fmakta ve y\u00fcr\u00fcmekte zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t polislerinin ba\u015fvurucuyu yere yat\u0131r\u0131p \u00fcst\u00fcnden ge\u00e7ti\u011fini ve \u00fczerinde z\u0131plad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u015fok tabancas\u0131na benzer bir aletle boynuna elektrik verdiklerini, \u00fczerine k\u00f6pek sald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcrekli hakaret ederek d\u00f6vd\u00fcklerini, bu hususlar\u0131n acil \u015fekilde kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden ba\u015fvurucunun tam te\u015fekk\u00fcll\u00fc bir hastaneye sevk edilmesinin gerekti\u011fini iddia edip \u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t polislerinin kasklar\u0131ndaki kameralar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun e\u015fiyle evde bulunan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin olaya tan\u0131k oldu\u011funu \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
6. Su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine derh\u00e2l soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k; Diyarbak\u0131r Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda bulunan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda tam te\u015fekk\u00fcll\u00fc devlet\/\u00fcniversite hastanesinden (g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015fi esnas\u0131nda adli raporun ald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 hastane d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka bir hastane) adli rapor ald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurucunun yakalanmas\u0131 esnas\u0131nda ilgili kolluk kuvveti personeline mukavemet g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi konusunda tutanak varsa bu tutana\u011f\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin g\u00f6nderilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde talimat vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. An\u0131lan talimat nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu, Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Gazi Ya\u015fargil E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesinde 10\/8\/2019 tarihinde tekrar muayene edilmi\u015ftir. Muayene sonucunda d\u00fczenlenen raporda darp ve cebir izine rastland\u0131\u011f\u0131, iki g\u00fcn \u00f6nce d\u00fczenlenen rapordaki hususlar\u0131n devam etti\u011fi, yaralanman\u0131n basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilece\u011fi, hayati tehlikenin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ertesi g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucu bir kez daha Selahaddin Eyyubi Devlet Hastanesinde muayene edilmi\u015f, sonucunda yeni darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kati hekim raporu d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; devam eden s\u00fcre\u00e7te 12\/8\/2019 tarihinde bir kez, 13\/8\/2019 tarihinde farkl\u0131 saatlerde iki kez daha Selahaddin Eyyubi Devlet Hastanesinde muayene edilmi\u015ftir. Muayeneler sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun aktif \u015fik\u00e2yeti olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair raporlar d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 13\/11\/2019 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gibidir:<\/p>\n
“… Olayla ilgili dosya aras\u0131nda celp edilen tahkikat dosyas\u0131nda bulunan 09\/08\/2019 tarihli kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince tutulan tutana\u011f\u0131n incelenmesinde, polis memurlar\u0131nca kap\u0131n\u0131n defaatle \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, kap\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine ikamet kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, ikamete girildi\u011fi esnada m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin polis memurlar\u0131na direndi\u011finin, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekiye direnmemesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ikazda bulunmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen direnmeye devam etmesi \u00fczerine g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanarak etkisiz hale getirildi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde tutanak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ve m\u00fc\u015ftekinin s\u00f6z konusu tutana\u011f\u0131 imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonucunda, PVSK’n\u0131n 16. maddesinde ‘Polis, g\u00f6revini yaparken direni\u015fle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmas\u0131 halinde, bu direni\u015fi k\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla ve k\u0131racak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zor kullanmaya yetkilidir. Zor kullanma yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda, direnmenin mahiyetine ve derecesine g\u00f6re ve direnenleri etkisiz hale getirecek \u015fekilde kademeli olarak artan nispette bedeni kuvvet, maddi g\u00fc\u00e7 ve kanuni \u015fartlar\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finde silah kullanabilir’ \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlemenin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin direnmesi sonucunda s\u00f6z konusu olayda basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilir \u015fekilde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait raporda yer alan yaralanman\u0131n direnme esnas\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu, polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n zor kullanma yetkilerini a\u015farak m\u00fc\u015ftekiyi darp ettiklerine dair \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir delil elde edilemedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; olay nedeniyle kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda kamu ad\u0131na kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na … karar verildi.”<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; su\u00e7 duyurusunda talep etti\u011fi hususlar hakk\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir i\u015flem yap\u0131lmadan kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, v\u00fccudundaki izler kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nabilecekken Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmemesinden dolay\u0131 bunun kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131namad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, beyan\u0131na ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay esnas\u0131nda orada bulunan e\u015fi ve misafirlerinin ifadesine ve tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131na m\u00fcracaat edilmesi gerekirken bu y\u00f6nde bir inceleme yap\u0131lmay\u0131p g\u00f6revli polislerin ifadesine de ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kask kameralar\u0131n\u0131n mevcut olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve olay\u0131n ne \u015fekilde meydana geldi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda dair karara itiraz etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131, Diyarbak\u0131r 1. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan 25\/7\/2020 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. An\u0131lan karar 13\/8\/2020 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucuya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucu 14\/9\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddet niteli\u011findeki fiillerine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu kapsamda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi sa\u011fl\u0131k raporuna ra\u011fmen \u015f\u00fcpheli kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, su\u00e7 duyurusunda delillerin ivedi olarak toplanmas\u0131 taleplerinin kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda polislerin silahlar\u0131n\u0131 almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 ve aktif bir bi\u00e7imde direnmesi sebebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir soru\u015fturma ve dava bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada da b\u00f6yle bir su\u00e7lama y\u00f6neltilmedi\u011fini, bunedenle polise direndi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay yeri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutulmu\u015f ve ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmayan tutanaklar ile s\u00f6z konusu k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele fiillerinin karart\u0131lmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi, yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75).<\/p>\n
16. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131, ki\u015fi \u00fczerindeki etkisi ne olursa olsun ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal ihlal eder. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde de g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 81).<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla yasaklanan muamelelerin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar, uygun delillerle desteklenmelidir. Bu delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde ise s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen delillerin iddiay\u0131 makul \u015f\u00fcphenin \u00f6tesinde ispat edip etmedi\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir. Bununla birlikte yeterince ciddi, a\u00e7\u0131k ve tutarl\u0131 emareler ya da aksi ispat edilemeyen birtak\u0131m karineler de iddian\u0131n ispat\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli kan\u0131t te\u015fkil edebilir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 95; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 83).<\/p>\n
18. Ki\u015finin g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada yaralanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde yetkili makamlar, bu olaya ili\u015fkin tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr (S.D., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95) zira bu t\u00fcr olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgiler \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fimindedir (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
19. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddedeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bireyin bir devlet g\u00f6revlisinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmay\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten ki\u015filer olaya kar\u0131\u015fan ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmal\u0131, soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli ve soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 111, 112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103). Ayr\u0131ca soru\u015fturma sonunda verilen karar, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ilgili bir de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7ermelidir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Cebrail Bekta\u015f ve Y\u00fcksel \u015eahin, B. No: 2015\/4787, 25\/9\/2019, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlardan, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen tutanaktan ve Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karardan ba\u015fvurucunun kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sonucunda yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken husus; kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn kesin olarak gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u015fayet gerekli ise g\u00fcc\u00fcn a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan, ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla da orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun evinde yap\u0131lan arama i\u015flemi nedeniyle d\u00fczenlenen 9\/8\/2019 tarihli tutanakta polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n elindeki silahlar\u0131 almaya te\u015febb\u00fcs edip g\u00f6revlilere direnmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu da d\u00e2hil \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 kademeli olarak g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutana\u011f\u0131 imzalam\u0131\u015f; tutana\u011f\u0131 imzalamas\u0131 konusunda kendisine bask\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 cebir kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da ileri s\u00fcrmemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t polislerinin kendisini yere yat\u0131r\u0131p \u00fczerinde z\u0131plad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, \u015fok tabancas\u0131na benzer bir aletle boynuna elektrik verdiklerini, \u00fczerine k\u00f6pek sald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcrekli d\u00f6vd\u00fcklerini ileri s\u00fcrse de ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlar iddialar\u0131 do\u011frulamamaktad\u0131r. \u015e\u00fcphesizan\u0131lan nitelikteki eylemler, ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudunda daha ciddi izler b\u0131rakacakt\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucuda tespit edilen bulgular; polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n silahlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131na ve bu konuda diren\u00e7 g\u00f6sterilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmalar\u0131 neticesinde meydana gelebilecek nitelikteki yaralard\u0131r. Bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gereksiz ve\/veya ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla orant\u0131s\u0131z oldu\u011fu s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutunun ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
23. Somut olayda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan su\u00e7 duyurusu \u00fczerine konuyla ilgili olarak derh\u00e2l bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden gerekli belgeler temin edilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun yeniden adli muayeneden ge\u00e7irilmesi sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yeniden yap\u0131lan muayene neticesinde Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Gazi Ya\u015fargil E\u011fitim ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen adli rapor Selahaddin Eyyubi Devlet Hastanesince 9\/8\/2019 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen raporla i\u00e7erik olarak ayn\u0131d\u0131r ve ba\u015fvurucunun \u00d6zel Harek\u00e2t polislerinin kendisini yere yat\u0131r\u0131p \u00fczerinde z\u0131plad\u0131klar\u0131na, \u015fok tabancas\u0131na benzer bir aletle boynuna elektrik verdiklerine, \u00fczerine k\u00f6pek sald\u0131klar\u0131na ve s\u00fcrekli d\u00f6vd\u00fcklerine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, \u00f6z\u00fc itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun da imzas\u0131 bulunan kolluk tutana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini ve ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen adli raporlar\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alarak kendi tutumu nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gerekli ve orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanan kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 d\u00e2hil baz\u0131 soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilip su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden eylemlerin saptanamamas\u0131ndan ileri gelmi\u015ftir. Unutulmamas\u0131 gerekir ki Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi, etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ait gerekliliklerin yerine getirilmesi pahas\u0131na ki\u015filerin Anayasa ile g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilebilece\u011fi veya ihlal edilmesi gerekti\u011fi \u015feklinde yorumlanamaz (ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Mahmut Alkan, B. No: 2018\/7436, 20\/10\/2021, \u00a7 72). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatma iste\u011finden ve vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan \u015f\u00fcphe edilmesini gerektiren bir neden bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun da ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM ve Kenan YA\u015eAR bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe kat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LMED\u0130\u011e\u0130NE Engin YILDIRIM ve Kenan YA\u015eAR’\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131oylar\u0131 ve OY\u00c7OKLU\u011eUYLA,<\/p>\n
C. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 11\/12\/2024 tarihinde karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eIOY GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131, bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Mahkememiz \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edilmedi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. A\u015fa\u011f\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu; kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin fiziksel \u015fiddet niteli\u011findeki fiillerine maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu kapsamda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi sa\u011fl\u0131k raporunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u015f\u00fcpheli kolluk g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanak i\u00e7eri\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verildi\u011fini, su\u00e7 duyurusunda delillerin ivedi olarak toplanmas\u0131 taleplerinin kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
3. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan, maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 koruma ve geli\u015ftirme hakk\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00f6ncelikle negatif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck olarak kamu otoritelerinin ki\u015filerin fiziksel ve ruhsal olarak zarar g\u00f6rmelerine neden olmamalar\u0131n\u0131 gerektirdi\u011fi gibi ayr\u0131ca pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fck olarak devlete ki\u015filerin i\u015fkence ve eziyete ya da insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir ceza veya muameleye maruz b\u0131rak\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131 engelleyecek tedbirler alma \u00f6devi y\u00fcklemektedir. S\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 belli baz\u0131 durumlarda, mevzuata uygun olarak ve sadece ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz h\u00e2llerde a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 olmamas\u0131 ko\u015fuluyla g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri taraf\u0131ndan fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir. Bununla beraber fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmak kesinlikle zorunlu h\u00e2le gelmedik\u00e7e bu neviden fiiller prensip olarak k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihlal edecektir. Devletin 17. madde kapsam\u0131nda sahip oldu\u011fu pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn usule ili\u015fkin boyutu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde bireyin k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddias\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi gereken ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkili kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in derh\u00e2l ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131, sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek b\u00fct\u00fcn delilleri tespit etmesi, olay\u0131 \u00e7evreleyen t\u00fcm ko\u015fullar\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatmas\u0131, nesnel ve tarafs\u0131z analizlere dayanmas\u0131, olaya kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olabilecek ki\u015filerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olmas\u0131, \u00f6zenle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesi ve su\u00e7 tespit edildi\u011fi takdirde eylemle orant\u0131l\u0131 bir ceza ile sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Kontrol alt\u0131ndaki ki\u015filerin v\u00fccutlar\u0131nda bir yaralanma tespit edilmi\u015fse ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele iddialar\u0131 da varsa yaralanman\u0131n nas\u0131l olu\u015ftu\u011fu konusunda makul bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc idari ve yarg\u0131sal kurumlar\u0131yla devlete aittir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015; Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013).<\/p>\n
4. Somut olayda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, polisler taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutana\u011fa at\u0131f yap\u0131lmakla yetinmi\u015f, olay\u0131n tam olarak hangi ko\u015fullarda meydana geldi\u011fini belirlemek i\u00e7in olaya kar\u0131\u015fan polislerin ifadesine ba\u015fvurmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Savc\u0131 olaylar\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu teyit etmeye veya ba\u015fvurucunun olaya ili\u015fkin anlatt\u0131klar\u0131 ve polisler taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen tutanaklardaki versiyon aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7eli\u015fkilere inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmadan tutanak i\u00e7eriklerini dikkate alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u00d6te yandan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucunun arama i\u015flemi esnas\u0131nda orada bulunan ki\u015fileri de dinleme taleplerini dikkate almam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu; su\u00e7 duyurusunda, arama i\u015flemine kat\u0131lan polislerin kask kameralar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tesptini, bulunuyorsa olaya ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin getirtilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Toplanmas\u0131 talep edilen deliller, olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n tespitine imk\u00e2n verebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k delillerin toplanmas\u0131 konusunda ad\u0131m atmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ku\u015fkusuz bu hususlara ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lacak bir soru\u015fturma, olaylar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131na ve polis taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesine yard\u0131mc\u0131 olabilecektir. Ancak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn orant\u0131l\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorusuna cevap verebilecek nitelikte etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fi kanaati ile \u00e7o\u011funluk karar\u0131na i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 11\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/31479 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 M. E.A. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/31479) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 11\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Resul TEMUR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Diyarbak\u0131r Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun evinde arama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu 9\/8\/2019-13\/8\/2019 tarihleri aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutulmu\u015ftur. 3. Polis memurlar\u0131, arama i\u015flemi nedeniyle 9\/8\/2019 tarihinde (saat 04.40) d\u00fczenledikleri tutanakta ba\u015fvurucunun evinin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun olarak \u00e7ald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, defaatle uyarmalar\u0131na ra\u011fmen evin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7an kimse olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kap\u0131y\u0131 k\u0131rarak i\u00e7eri girdiklerini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu \u00fc\u00e7 ki\u015finin ellerindeki silahlar\u0131 almaya te\u015febb\u00fcs etti\u011fini ve direndi\u011fi, bu nedenle bu ki\u015filere kar\u015f\u0131 kademeli olarak g\u00fc\u00e7 kulland\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Kendilerine zararlar\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorulan ba\u015fvurucu ile di\u011fer iki ki\u015fi, kap\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 haricinde zararlar\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Tutana\u011f\u0131n alt\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun imzas\u0131 da bulunmaktad\u0131r. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, yakalanmas\u0131n\u0131n akabinde ilk olarak Selahaddin Eyyubi Devlet Hastanesine …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n