T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ENG\u0130N G\u00d6KO\u011eLU BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/26192)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin G\u00d6KO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Nazan Bet\u00fcl VANG\u00d6L\u00dc KOZA\u011eA\u00c7LI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda protesto eylemine yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale s\u0131ras\u0131nda infaz koruma g\u00f6revlilerinin haks\u0131z g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sebebiyle bir ki\u015finin v\u00fccudunda kemik k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 olu\u015facak \u015fekilde yaralanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, DHKP-C silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 21\/9\/2017 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla tutuklu s\u0131fat\u0131yla Tekirda\u011f 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvurunun incelenme tarihi itibar\u0131yla sil\u00e2hl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu i\u015flemi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olup h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc s\u0131fat\u0131yla Tekirda\u011f 1 No.lu F Tipi Y\u00fcksek G\u00fcvenlikli Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130nfaz koruma g\u00f6revlileri ba\u015fvuruya konu olay hakk\u0131nda 30\/10\/2017 tarihli bir tutanak tutmu\u015ftur. Bu tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re; “…oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131lan Sol Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutuklular\u0131 [A.D.], [M.D.], Engin G\u00f6ko\u011flu, [B.G.]’in kalmakta oldu\u011fu A – 26 nolu odada bulunan … tuvalet pe\u00e7eteli\u011fini s\u00f6kerek ko\u011fu\u015fta bulunan camlar\u0131, masa sandalyeleri k\u0131rmak sureti ile ko\u011fu\u015f kap\u0131s\u0131na vurarak ‘bizi arkada\u015flar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n yan\u0131na verin, yoksa buray\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131za y\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131z, buray\u0131 yakaca\u011f\u0131z, bunun size d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fc k\u00f6t\u00fc olacak’ diyerek isyan giri\u015fiminde bulunmalar\u0131 \u00fczerine saat 16.20’de Kurum M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc, N\u00f6bet\u00e7i M\u00fcd\u00fcr, di\u011fer M\u00fcd\u00fcr ve personeller ile ko\u011fu\u015f mazgal\u0131na gidilmi\u015f, kendileri ikna edilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de ko\u011fu\u015fta bulunan malzemeleri g\u00f6revli personellere f\u0131rlatmalar\u0131 \u00fczerine gerekli g\u00fcvenlik \u00f6nlemleri al\u0131narak bir isyan giri\u015fimini engellemek ve daha b\u00fcy\u00fck olaylara mahal vermemek \u00fczere ko\u011fu\u015fa girilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutuklular ko\u011fu\u015f i\u00e7erisindeki k\u0131rm\u0131\u015f olduklar\u0131 malzemeler ile g\u00f6revlilere sald\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, bunun \u00fczerine s\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutuklular yasal zor kullanma yetkilerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde etkisiz hale getirilerek ko\u011fu\u015ftan al\u0131narak, t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahaleye gerek g\u00f6r\u00fclen tutuklu Engin G\u00f6ko\u011flu ile Kurumumuz \u0130nfaz Koruma Memuru [K.\u00c7.] tedavi ama\u00e7l\u0131 kurum revirine \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup oradan da Tekirda\u011f Devlet Hastanesine sevkleri sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutuklular [A.D.], [M.D.] ve [B.G.] kendilerine, Kuruma ve g\u00f6revli personele zarar vermemeleri i\u00e7in tedbir amac\u0131 ile M\u00fc\u015fahade-2 nolu odaya al\u0131nm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
4. Olay nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu mahpuslar hakk\u0131nda \u0130nfaz Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan disiplin soru\u015fturmas\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve soru\u015fturma sonunda kuruma zarar verdikleri, kap\u0131ya vurarak eylemde bulunduklar\u0131 ve isyan giri\u015fiminde bulunduklar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle 20 g\u00fcn h\u00fccreye koyma cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 8\/12\/2017 tarihinde Tekirda\u011f Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi dilek\u00e7e ile olay nedeniyle \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Bu \u015fik\u00e2yete g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu \u0130nfaz Kurumunda sekiz ki\u015filik A-8 ko\u011fu\u015funda bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. 30\/10\/2017 tarihinde odaya gelen infaz koruma g\u00f6revlileri ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer \u00fc\u00e7 mahpusu oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle ve zorla A-26 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fka bir ko\u011fu\u015fa g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015fler, ba\u015fvurucu ile bu \u00fc\u00e7 mahpusun g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fckleri ko\u011fu\u015fta bu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi protesto etmek amac\u0131yla slogan atmaya ve kap\u0131y\u0131 yumruklamaya ba\u015flamas\u0131 \u00fczerine toplumsal olaylara m\u00fcdahale k\u0131yafetli [ba\u015fvuru formunda robokop k\u0131yafeti olarak ge\u00e7mektedir.] infaz koruma g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan ko\u011fu\u015fa girilmi\u015f ve mahpuslara m\u00fcdahale edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00fczerine tazyikli su s\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, copla kendisine vuruldu\u011funu ve bu m\u00fcdahale esnas\u0131nda bir infaz koruma g\u00f6revlisinin onu g\u00f6t\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in kolunu b\u00fckt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada kolunun k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu kolunun k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen onu tedavi ettirmek yerine \u00e7\u0131r\u0131l\u00e7\u0131plak kalacak \u015fekilde soyduklar\u0131n\u0131, ayaklar\u0131ndan kelep\u00e7eleyerek ve yerde s\u00fcr\u00fckleyerek mahk\u00fbm kabul b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclerek burada iki saat kadar bekletildikten sonra ambulans \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 fakat gelen ambulans\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrmeden geri d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve ancak ak\u015fam saatlerinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u0131srar\u0131 \u00fczerine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hastanede ise gerekli tedavi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n sadece bir atel tak\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra tekrar infaz kurumuna getirildi\u011fini, k\u0131r\u0131k kolunun tedavisinin yine kendi \u0131srarlar\u0131 neticesinde iki g\u00fcn sonra g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fcniversite hastanesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini de ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, kendisine \u015fiddet uygulayan infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 ile su\u00e7a g\u00f6z yuman m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015f; delil olarak kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun avukatlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 olaya ili\u015fkin i\u015fkence su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011finden bahisle bir ba\u015fka \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi daha verilmi\u015ftir. Her iki dilek\u00e7e \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturmalar, ayn\u0131 olaya ili\u015fkin olan ve ba\u015fvurucu ile yan\u0131ndakiler hakk\u0131nda kamu g\u00f6revlisine g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 hakaret su\u00e7unu i\u015flenmi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesi ile ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Yine ba\u015fvurucu ve \u00fc\u00e7 arkada\u015f\u0131 aleyhine A-26 ko\u011fu\u015funda ya\u015fanan direnme olaylar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kamu mal\u0131na zarar verme ve g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka bir soru\u015fturma daha y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bu soru\u015fturmalar neticesinde ba\u015fvurucu ve yan\u0131ndakiler hakk\u0131nda ya\u015fanan olay nedeniyle kamu mal\u0131na zarar verme, g\u00f6revi yapt\u0131rmamak i\u00e7in direnme ve kamu g\u00f6revlisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00f6revinden dolay\u0131 hakaret su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledikleri gerek\u00e7esiyle a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n asliye ceza mahkemesi nezdinde devam etmekte oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Tekirda\u011f Devlet Hastanesinin 31\/10\/2017 tarihli Genel Adli Muayene formunda “Darp cebir nedeni ile geldi\u011fi, sa\u011f skapular b\u00f6lgesine 6×3 cm ekimoz mevcut, sa\u011f alt lomber b\u00f6lgede 2×1 cm ekimoz oldu\u011fu, sol vertebra alt b\u00f6lgede 1×1 cm ekimoz oldu\u011fu, sol posterior aurikula kep\u00e7esinde hassasiyet, sol \u00f6n kolda uzun atel oldu\u011fu \u00e7ekilen grafide humerus \u015faft k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu, hayati tehlikesinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilemedi\u011fi” rapor edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Nam\u0131k Kemal \u00dcniversitesi Sa\u011fl\u0131k Uygulama ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Merkezi Adli T\u0131p Poliklini\u011finden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan 28\/5\/2018 tarihli muayene raporunda; “\u015eahs\u0131n sol kol hareketlerini yaparken k\u0131s\u0131tl\u0131l\u0131k oldu\u011funu, sol el 4. ve 5. parmaklarda uyu\u015fma tarifledi\u011fi, \u00e7ekilen grafilerde iyile\u015fen humerus k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 mevcut oldu\u011fu, … yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015finin v\u00fccuduna ac\u0131 verecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu; basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif derecede oldu\u011fu; ki\u015finin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokacak nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; organlar\u0131ndan birinin i\u015flevinin s\u00fcrekli zay\u0131flamas\u0131 yada yitirilmesi niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de\u011ferlendirilebilmesi i\u00e7in hastan\u0131n olaydan 12 ay sonra tekrar muayene edilmesi gerekti\u011fi ve tarif edilen humerus \u015faft k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hayat fonksiyonlar\u0131 \u00fczerine etkisinin 3 (orta) derecede oldu\u011fu” tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. Nam\u0131k Kemal \u00dcniversitesi Sa\u011fl\u0131k Uygulama ve Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Merkezi Adli T\u0131p Poliklini\u011finden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f olan 18\/12\/2018 tarihli muayene raporunda; “28.05.2018 tarihli raporumuzda, ki\u015finin yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n ‘Basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif derecede oldu\u011fu’ sehven yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan: Yaralanmas\u0131n\u0131n; Basit t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale ile giderilebilecek \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hafif derecede olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; Ki\u015finin v\u00fccuduna ac\u0131 verecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu; Ki\u015finin ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 tehlikeye sokacak nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; Sa\u011f \u00f6n kolda mevcut araz\u0131n organlar\u0131ndan birinin i\u015flevinin s\u00fcrekli zay\u0131flamas\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu; … K\u0131r\u0131klar\u0131n ya\u015fam fonksiyonlar\u0131 \u00fczerine etkisinin … 3(ORTA) derecede OLDU\u011eU,” tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda Adli T\u0131p Kurumundan yasal zor kullanma yetkisinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131l\u0131p a\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaa verilmesi istenmi\u015ftir. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 2. \u0130htisas Kurulunca d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olan 29\/5\/2019 tarihli adli t\u0131p raporunda, “Ki\u015finin dava konusu (30.01.2017) tarihinde meydana gelen olay nedeniyle sa\u011f kolunda humerus orta diafizer b\u00f6lgedeki k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131n lokalizasyonu ve v\u00fccuttaki ektileri dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda sert ve k\u00fcnt bir cismin dierekt havalesi ile meydan gelebilece\u011fi gibi ki\u015finin sa\u011f kolunun \u00fczerine d\u00fc\u015fmesi\u2013d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi (arbede s\u0131ras\u0131nda) ile uygun bir zemine \u00e7arpmas\u0131 ile de meydana gelebilecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu, soruldu\u011fu \u00fczere yasal zor kullanma yetkisinin a\u015f\u0131l\u0131p a\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir kanaate var\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131” sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan 11\/12\/2018 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda olay g\u00fcn\u00fcne ait sessiz g\u00fcvenlik kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ile sesli el kameras\u0131 kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi neticesinde; mahpuslar\u0131n A-8 ko\u011fu\u015fundan A-26 ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fckleri anlara ili\u015fkin herhangi bir kamera kayd\u0131n\u0131n mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, A-26 ko\u011fu\u015funa al\u0131nan mahpuslar\u0131n ko\u011fu\u015f i\u00e7erisindeki malzemelere zarar vermeleri \u00fczerine kurum m\u00fcd\u00fcrleri ve infaz koruma g\u00f6revlilerinin m\u00fcdahale etmek i\u00e7in ko\u011fu\u015fa girdi\u011fi, bu alanda g\u00fcvenlik kameras\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve el kameras\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ekim alan\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan buradaki m\u00fcdahalenin tespit edilemedi\u011fi, el kameras\u0131n\u0131n kay\u0131tlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda herhangi bir kopukluk olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, infaz koruma memurlar\u0131na sivil tak\u0131m elbiseli kurum m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerinin talimat verdi\u011fi, mahpuslar\u0131n ko\u011fu\u015ftan \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131l\u0131rken infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan yere yat\u0131r\u0131larak kollar\u0131n\u0131n arkadan kelep\u00e7elendi\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun ba\u015f\u0131nda kask olmayan iki infaz koruma memuru ile ba\u015f\u0131nda kask olan iki infaz koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan A-26 No.lu odan\u0131n havaland\u0131rmas\u0131ndan al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 esnada \u0130nfaz Kurumu m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerinden oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen iki sivil k\u0131yafetli \u015fahs\u0131n kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmas\u0131 talimat\u0131 vermesi \u00fczerine toplumsal olaylara m\u00fcdahale k\u0131yafetli, ba\u015f\u0131ndaki kaskta numara olmayan bir infaz koruma memurunun ba\u015fvurucuyu yere yat\u0131rmak i\u00e7in ona \u00e7elme takt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kolu arkadan tutulan ba\u015fvurucunun yere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anda ba\u015fvurucunun “Ah! Ah! Kolum k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.” \u015feklinde ba\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun bu anda k\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olabilece\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun koridorda g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcrken infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tekerlekli hasta sandalyesine oturtuldu\u011fu, \u015fahs\u0131n sa\u011f kolunu dirsek k\u0131sm\u0131ndan tuttu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun, di\u011fer mahpuslar\u0131n ve infaz koruma g\u00f6revlilerinin ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 30\/11\/2017 tarihinde al\u0131nan ifadesinde A-8 ko\u011fu\u015fundan 3-4 infaz koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcr\u00fcklenerek ve zorla A-26 ko\u011fu\u015funa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, A-26 ko\u011fu\u015fundaki m\u00fcdahale esnas\u0131nda ise infaz koruma memurlar\u0131na bir e\u015fya f\u0131rlatmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi direnme de g\u00f6stermedi\u011fini, 5-6 infaz koruma memurunun kendisine sald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kolunun bu g\u00f6revliler taraf\u0131ndan havaland\u0131rma alan\u0131ndan ko\u011fu\u015fa g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc s\u0131rada kolunu arkaya do\u011fru ters b\u00fcken bir infaz koruma memuru taraf\u0131ndan k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kolunun k\u0131r\u0131k oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemesine ra\u011fmen memurlardan birinin surat\u0131na tokat att\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
10. Soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda ifadeleri al\u0131nan infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 ise mahpuslar\u0131n ko\u011fu\u015f de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine fiziksel ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc olarak diren\u00e7 g\u00f6sterdiklerini ve bu direni\u015fi g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fckleri ko\u011fu\u015fta da s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcp orada bulunan e\u015fyalara zarar verdiklerini, m\u00fcdahale i\u00e7in i\u00e7eri giren g\u00f6revlilere kar\u015f\u0131 da aktif olarak direni\u015f g\u00f6sterdiklerini, m\u00fcdahale ile d\u0131\u015far\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcdahale s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki karma\u015fa ve \u015fah\u0131slar\u0131n s\u00fcrekli olarak aktif diren\u00e7lerine devam etmeleri nedeni ile ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun kim taraf\u0131ndan ve nas\u0131l k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmediklerini ve olaya ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri izlediklerinde de ba\u015fvurucuya m\u00fcdahale eden g\u00f6revlinin takt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kaskta numara bulunmamas\u0131 ve olay i\u00e7inde bulunan t\u00fcm g\u00f6revlilerin y\u00fczlerinin de kapal\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bir te\u015fhis yapamad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
11. Olaya kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc M.D. ifadesinde ko\u011fu\u015f de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi i\u00e7in odaya gelen infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kendilerine kar\u015f\u0131 fiziki \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin de bir\u00e7ok yerinden yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 olayda ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve B.G. isimli mahpusun kaburgalar\u0131n\u0131n ezildi\u011fini; h\u00fck\u00fcm\u00f6zl\u00fc M.T. ise, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc kurum m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn yan\u0131nda bulunan infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 ile kalmakta olduklar\u0131 A-8 numaral\u0131 ko\u011fu\u015fa gelerek orada kalanlar\u0131 ay\u0131racaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, bu karara ili\u015fkin bir gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilmemesi nedeniyle ko\u011fu\u015fta kalan mahpuslar\u0131n oturma eylemine ge\u00e7ti\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun da i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu d\u00f6rt mahpusun g\u00f6revlilerce ko\u011fu\u015ftan al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu beyan etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Olay nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu ve yan\u0131ndaki mahpuslar\u0131n direnmeleri esnas\u0131nda g\u00f6sterdikleri fiziksel eylemler nedeniyle bir infaz koruma memuru hakk\u0131nda iki g\u00fcn, bir di\u011fer infaz koruma memuru hakk\u0131nda ise \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u015f g\u00f6rmezlik raporu verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yine ba\u015fvurucu ve yan\u0131ndaki mahpuslar taraf\u0131ndan olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 A-26 No.lu odada 498 TL de\u011ferinde hasar meydana geldi\u011finin bilirki\u015fi raporu ile tespit edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 26\/4\/2020 tarihinde zor kullanma yetkisine ili\u015fkin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve i\u015fkence su\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k karar\u0131ndaki ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcm \u015fu \u015fekildedir:<\/p>\n
“M\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli tutuklu\/ h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi karar\u0131n\u0131n yerine getirilmesini engellemeye y\u00f6nelik davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 nedeniyle m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheliler g\u00f6revli cezaevi personelinin ve m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6nce s\u00f6zl\u00fc uyar\u0131 ve ikna gibi bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131 y\u00f6ntemlerin sab\u0131rla denendi\u011fi, buna ra\u011fmen m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcphelilerin davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nlenemedi\u011fi ve itaatin sa\u011flanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ba\u015fka \u00e7arenin de kalmamas\u0131 sebebiyle direnen M\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli tutuklu\/ h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclere zarar verme, onu \u0131zd\u0131raba, ac\u0131ya sevk etme gibi bir kast\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, aksine sadece zor kullanmaya neden olan fiilleri ile orant\u0131l\u0131 bir \u015fekilde etkisiz hale getirme amac\u0131na y\u00f6nelik davran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheliler g\u00f6revli cezaevi personelinin ve m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasam\u0131z, kanunlar\u0131m\u0131z ve t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn nezdinde kendilerine verilmi\u015f olan yetkileri kulland\u0131klar\u0131, Engin G\u00f6ko\u011flu’nun direnme esnas\u0131nda kolu k\u0131r\u0131lsa da al\u0131nan kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan da anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere g\u00f6revli cezaevi personelinin ve m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn, ki\u015filere zarar verme kasd\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, aktif direnme s\u0131ras\u0131nda olu\u015fan yaralanmalar oldu\u011fu, a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle m\u00fc\u015fteki \u015f\u00fcpheli g\u00f6revli cezaevi personelinin ve m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130\u015fkence su\u00e7undan ve Zor Kullanma Yetkisine \u0130li\u015fkin S\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n A\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015flemedikleri…” [gerek\u00e7esi g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.]<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu; kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara eksik soru\u015fturma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek itiraz etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi itiraz\u0131 6\/7\/2020 tarihinde reddetmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fcn 16\/7\/2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilmesinden sonra 14\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME <\/p>\n
16. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; bulundu\u011fu ko\u011fu\u015fa giren infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00fczerine tazyikli su s\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, copla d\u00f6v\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve ko\u011fu\u015ftan zorla \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131l\u0131rken kol kemi\u011finin k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, k\u0131r\u0131lan kolu nedeniyle tedaviye ihtiya\u00e7 duymas\u0131na ra\u011fmen tedavi imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n ge\u00e7 sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bu konuda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturman\u0131n etkili y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmeyerek sorumlular\u0131n cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 ile etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, adli makamlar\u0131n tespitinden ve ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ancak iki ayr\u0131 ba\u015fl\u0131k alt\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
A. G\u00fc\u00e7 Kullan\u0131m\u0131 Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
20. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmaya yetkili kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, tutumu nedeniyle kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 kesin olarak gerekli olmayan bir ki\u015fiye kar\u015f\u0131 fiziksel g\u00fcce ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131 ilke olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmektedir. Kesin gerekli oldu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde bile g\u00fc\u00e7, a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan kullan\u0131lmal\u0131 ve ki\u015finin tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 olmal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 81, 82).<\/p>\n
21. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutukluluk gibi bireyin devletin kontrol\u00fc alt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada bir yaralanma olay\u0131 meydana gelmi\u015f ise bu olaya ili\u015fkin olarak tatmin edici ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yetkili makamlara aittir (S. D.., B. No: 2013\/3017, 16\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 89, 90; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, B. No: 2013\/8137, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 95). Bunun sebebi bu t\u00fcr olaylarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilgilerin \u00e7o\u011funlukla yetkili makamlar\u0131n eri\u015fiminde olmas\u0131d\u0131r (Ferit Kurt ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/9957, 8\/6\/2021, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn gerekli ve ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gereken husus, kullan\u0131lan g\u00fcc\u00fcn kesin olarak gerekli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u015fayet gerekli ise g\u00fcc\u00fcn a\u015f\u0131r\u0131ya ka\u00e7madan, ba\u015fvurucunun tutumuyla da orant\u0131l\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131l\u0131p kullan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. \u0130nfaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczenledi\u011fi tutanakta (bkz. \u00a7 3) ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun nas\u0131l k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir kay\u0131t yoktur. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporu ve Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma sonunda verdi\u011fi karardaki gerek\u00e7e dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun, bir infaz koruma memurunun ba\u015fvurucuya \u00e7elme tak\u0131p ba\u015fvurucunun kolunu arkas\u0131ndan tutmas\u0131 neticesinde k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucunun da aras\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu d\u00f6rt mahpusun bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 odada kurum e\u015fyas\u0131na zarar verilmesi ve odadan kurum g\u00f6revlilerine y\u00f6nelik tehdit i\u00e7erikli s\u00f6zler s\u00f6ylenmesi \u00fczerine (bkz. \u00a7 3) kurum e\u015fyas\u0131na zarar verilmesine y\u00f6nelik eylemin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve ceza infaz kurumu disiplinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ad\u0131na odaya m\u00fcdahale edilmesi planlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu plan do\u011frultusunda infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 -en az\u0131ndan baz\u0131s\u0131- v\u00fccutlar\u0131n\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rmemesi i\u00e7in korunakl\u0131 k\u0131yafetler giyerek odaya girmi\u015ftir. \u0130kisi kaskl\u0131 ikisi kasks\u0131z d\u00f6rt infaz koruma memuru ba\u015fvurucuyu havaland\u0131rma alan\u0131ndan alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu esnada iki sivil \u015fahs\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talimat\u0131 \u00fczerine kask\u0131nda numaraya olmayan, korunakl\u0131 k\u0131yafet giymi\u015f bir infaz koruma memuru, bir yandan \u00e7elme takmak suretiyle ba\u015fvurucuyu yere d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f bir yandan da ba\u015fvurucunun kolunu arkas\u0131ndan tutmu\u015ftur. Oysa ne olay nedeniyle d\u00fczenlenen tutanakta ne bilirki\u015fi raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun kelep\u00e7e tak\u0131lmas\u0131na etken veya edilgen olarak direndi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 3, 8). Kald\u0131 ki ba\u015fvurucuya ayakta bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada kelep\u00e7e takma imk\u00e2n\u0131 varken kelep\u00e7e takmak ad\u0131na ba\u015fvurucunun bir taraftan \u00e7elme tak\u0131larak yere d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 bir taraftan da d\u00fc\u015fmesine mani olaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun arkadan \u00e7ekilmesi somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda a\u015f\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olan infaz koruma memurunun y\u00fcz\u00fcn\u00fcn kapal\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve ba\u015f\u0131ndaki kaskta numara olmamas\u0131, yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin mahpuslara zarar verilmesi riskini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funca en aza indirgeyecek \u015fekilde usul\u00fcne uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fini g\u00f6stermektedir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yasaklanan muamelelerle ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelerine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na neden olan muamele, eziyet olarak kabul edilebilir (bahsi ge\u00e7en muamelelerle ilgili ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok karar aras\u0131ndan bkz. S. D., \u00a7 84-88; Cengiz Kahraman ve Kenan \u00d6zy\u00fcrek, \u00a7\u00a7 90-94). Bu durumda eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi boyutu ihlal edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi -\u201cDevletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revleri\u201d kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 5. maddesindeki genel y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckle birlikte yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda- bir kimsenin devlet g\u00f6revlilerinin 17. maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal eden bir muamelesine u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddiada bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesini gerektirir. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. \u015eik\u00e2yet olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bile ki\u015fiye k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelede bulunuldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterince a\u00e7\u0131k belirtiler varsa konuyla ilgili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci, gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine ve ma\u011fdurun eri\u015fimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131; ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli; soru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Ayr\u0131ca yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103; S. D., \u00a7\u00a7 111-114; Veli Sa\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k (2), B. No: 2018\/24614, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 16).<\/p>\n
26. Kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131ndan, verilen ifadelerden ve olay hakk\u0131nda tutulmu\u015f olan tutanaktan ba\u015fvurucunun protestoya kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bunu sonland\u0131rmak isteyen infaz koruma memurlar\u0131na direndi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Ancak g\u00f6zlenen bu durumun ba\u015fvurucunun infaz koruma memurlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan kolunun k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na sebep olacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde fiziksel \u015fiddete maruz kalmas\u0131n\u0131, bir ba\u015fka ifadeyle eylemin orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yetecek bir tespit olarak nitelendirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn g\u00f6r\u00fcnmemektedir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan olaya kar\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olan infaz koruma memurlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti sa\u011fland\u0131ktan sonra ba\u015fvurucunun kolunun k\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furan m\u00fcdahaleyi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren infaz koruma g\u00f6revlisinin kim oldu\u011funun tespiti noktas\u0131nda yeterli ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015f olan m\u00fcdahalenin gereklili\u011fi ve orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeksizin t\u00fcm \u0130nfaz Kurumu personeli hakk\u0131nda \u00e7ok genel bir incelemeyle sonuca var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u00d6zetle soru\u015fturma makam\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun yaralanma bi\u00e7imi ve nedenine, eylemin orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik makul, doyurucu bir a\u00e7\u0131klama getirmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucuya y\u00f6nelik kemik k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile sonu\u00e7lanan eylemin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ko\u015fullar\u0131 ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 itibar\u0131yla orant\u0131l\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahale olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve fiziksel m\u00fcdahalenin a\u015f\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ikna edici unsurlar\u0131n (k\u0131r\u0131\u011fa y\u00f6nelik t\u0131bbi tespit) varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n m\u00fcdahalenin orant\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair makul bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada\/de\u011ferlendirmede bulunulmadan salt zor kullanma yetkisi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi temelinde s\u00fcrecin sonland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin ilkelerle ba\u011fda\u015fmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Bu hususlar birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek adli s\u00fcrecin mutlaka bir dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n belli bir h\u00fck\u00fcmle sonu\u00e7lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemekle birlikte ba\u015fvurucuya kar\u015f\u0131 k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olu\u015fturdu\u011fu iddia edilen eylemlere y\u00f6nelik olay\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Zaman\u0131nda Tedavi Uygulanmam\u0131\u015f Olmas\u0131 Nedeniyle K\u00f6t\u00fc Muamele Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucu, k\u0131r\u0131lan kolu nedeniyle fizik tedaviye ihtiya\u00e7 duydu\u011funu fakat bu konuda kendisine zaman\u0131nda tedavi imk\u00e2n\u0131 sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, olay sonras\u0131 infaz koruma memurlar\u0131na kolunun k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen iki saat kadar bekletildikten sonra ambulans \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak gelen ambulans\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrmeden geri d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ve ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ak\u015fam saatlerinde ba\u015fvurucunun \u0131srar\u0131 \u00fczerine g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hastanede ise gerekli tedavi yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n sadece bir atel tak\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra tekrar infaz kurumuna getirildi\u011fini, k\u0131r\u0131k kolunun tedavisinin yine kendi \u0131srarlar\u0131 neticesinde ancak iki g\u00fcn sonra g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00fcniversite hastanesinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
30. Ba\u015fvurucunun zaman\u0131nda tedavi uygulanmam\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131n\u0131n iki boyutu oldu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. \u0130nfaz Kurumu yetkilileri\/g\u00f6revlileri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan iddia de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, Kurum yetkililerinin ba\u015fvurucunun tedaviye ihtiya\u00e7 duyuyor olmas\u0131naili\u015fkin durumu\/ciddiyeti bilip bilmediklerinin veya bilmelerinin gerekip gerekmedi\u011finin saptanmas\u0131, bu ihtiyac\u0131 bildikleri veya bilmeleri gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde de ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, sa\u011fl\u0131k hizmetine eri\u015fiminin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan gerekli \u00f6nleyici tedbirleri al\u0131p almad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
31. Ba\u015fvuru formundaki ve soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131ndaki bilgi ve belgelere g\u00f6re \u0130nfaz Kurumu g\u00f6revlileri olay sonras\u0131nda kolunun k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden ba\u015fvurucu i\u00e7in 112 Acil \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131 Merkezine ula\u015farak \u0130nfaz Kurumuna ambulans \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Gelen sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlilerince ilk m\u00fcdahalesi yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun talebi \u00fczerine ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn ak\u015fam saatlerinde tekrar tedavi i\u00e7in hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclen ba\u015fvurucuya burada tedavi amac\u0131yla atel tak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve yine ba\u015fvurucunun talebi \u00fczerine iki g\u00fcn sonra tekrar bir ba\u015fka hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olan ba\u015fvurucunun tedavisi burada ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Bu tespitler ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u0130nfaz Kurumu yetkililerinin olay g\u00fcn\u00fc ve sonras\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun tedavisi i\u00e7in gerekli olan makul ve etkili tedbirleri almakta yetersiz kalmad\u0131klar\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucunun olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u0130nfaz Kurumuna \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan ambulansta g\u00f6revli paramedik ve yine olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn ak\u015fam\u0131 g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fu hastanede kendisine atel takm\u0131\u015f olan sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlilerinin gerekli tedaviyi zaman\u0131nda uygulamam\u0131\u015f olmalar\u0131 nedeniyle t\u0131bbi ihmal sonucu zarara u\u011fram\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise, ilke olarak t\u0131bbi ihmallere ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetler konusunda temel ba\u015fvuru yolu, hukuki sorumlulu\u011fu tespit ad\u0131na takip edilecek olan hukuk veya idari tazminat davas\u0131 yoludur (Nail Artu\u00e7, B. No: 2013\/2839, 3\/4\/2014, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
33. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu yukar\u0131da da ifade edildi\u011fi gibi ilgili sa\u011fl\u0131k \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n gerekli tedaviyi zaman\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmemi\u015f olmalar\u0131ndan yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu esasen olay sonras\u0131nda tedavisini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiren sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlilerinin ihmalleri nedeniyle ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir. Olayda ihmali oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunulmu\u015f olmakla birlikte, ilgili ki\u015fi veya sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu\u015funun idari ve hukuki sorumluluklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir tazmin yoluna ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Ceza kanunlar\u0131 uyar\u0131nca su\u00e7 olu\u015fturmayan eylem ve ihmallere kar\u015f\u0131 da husumetin y\u00f6neltilece\u011fi ki\u015fiye ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak, 6\/1\/1982 tarihli ve 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu ile 11\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu uyar\u0131nca kusur sorumlulu\u011funa dayal\u0131 olarak idareye veya ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik idare ve hukuk mahkemeleri \u00f6n\u00fcnde, u\u011fran\u0131lan zararlar\u0131 tazmin yollar\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir (Bilal Turan ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2013\/2075, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 74).<\/p>\n
34. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda ba\u015fvurucunun, hukuki ve idari kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ilgili hekim ya da hastanenin idari ve hukuki sorumluluklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu nedenle, yap\u0131lan t\u0131bbi m\u00fcdahale a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ihlale neden oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen i\u015flem, eylem ya da ihmal i\u00e7in kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f idari ve yarg\u0131sal ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131 t\u00fcketilmeksizin bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eyle ba\u015fvurunun bu b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 250.000 TL tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
36. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen, kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n eylemlerinden ve soru\u015fturma merciinin kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131ndan kaynaklanan hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden soru\u015fturma i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan ([GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
37. \u0130hlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda taleple ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net 250.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. G\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131m\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda dile getirilen iddialar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Zaman\u0131nda tedavi uygulanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutlar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Tekirda\u011f Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (\u0130hlal karar\u0131 Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n 2017\/12765 numaral\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131yla ilgilidir.) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n maddi ve usul boyutunun ihlali nedeniyle net 250.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/26192 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ENG\u0130N G\u00d6KO\u011eLU BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/26192) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Engin G\u00d6KO\u011eLU Vekili : Av. Nazan Bet\u00fcl VANG\u00d6L\u00dc KOZA\u011eA\u00c7LI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza infaz kurumunda protesto eylemine yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahale s\u0131ras\u0131nda infaz koruma g\u00f6revlilerinin haks\u0131z g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanmas\u0131 sebebiyle bir ki\u015finin v\u00fccudunda kemik k\u0131r\u0131\u011f\u0131 olu\u015facak \u015fekilde yaralanmas\u0131 ve bu olay hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n etkisizli\u011fi nedeniyle eziyet yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, DHKP-C silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle 21\/9\/2017 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla tutuklu s\u0131fat\u0131yla Tekirda\u011f 2 No.lu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda (\u0130nfaz Kurumu) bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvurunun incelenme tarihi itibar\u0131yla sil\u00e2hl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7unu i\u015flemi\u015f oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015f olup h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc s\u0131fat\u0131yla Tekirda\u011f 1 No.lu F Tipi Y\u00fcksek G\u00fcvenlikli Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda bar\u0131nd\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. 3. \u0130nfaz koruma g\u00f6revlileri ba\u015fvuruya konu olay hakk\u0131nda 30\/10\/2017 tarihli bir tutanak tutmu\u015ftur. Bu tutana\u011fa g\u00f6re; “…oda de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yap\u0131lan Sol Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc tutuklular\u0131 [A.D.], [M.D.], Engin G\u00f6ko\u011flu, [B.G.]’in kalmakta oldu\u011fu …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n