T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
L\u0130MAN-\u0130\u015e SEND\u0130KASI GENEL MERKEZ\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/20195<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
G\u00fcls\u00fcm Gizem G\u00dcRSOY<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
L\u0130MAN-\u0130\u015e SEND\u0130KASI GENEL MERKEZ\u0130<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Derya DEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, yetki tespitine itiraz talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu sendika, davac\u0131 i\u015fyerinde toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (T\u0130S) akdedebilmek i\u00e7in yetkili sendika oldu\u011funun tespiti talebiyle \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun yeterli \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederek yetki belgesi vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Bunun \u00fczerine davac\u0131 i\u015fyeri, yetki tespitine itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ile 18\/10\/2012 tarihli ve 6356 say\u0131l\u0131 Sendikalar ve Toplu \u0130\u015f S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Kanunu uyar\u0131nca T\u0130S s\u00fcreci dava sonu\u00e7lanana kadar durmakta ve mahkemenin hangi sendikan\u0131n T\u0130S yapma yetkisine sahip oldu\u011funu tespit etmesi beklenmektedir.<\/p>\n
4. A\u00e7\u0131lan dava be\u015f y\u0131l s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve bu s\u00fcrenin sonunda ba\u015fvurucu sendikan\u0131n yetkili oldu\u011funa karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin nihai karar\u0131 16\/2\/2023 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmesi \u00fczerine 15\/3\/2023 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
5. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu; 6356 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da k\u0131sa s\u00fcreler \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvuruya konu davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle \u00fcyeleri ad\u0131na T\u0130S yapamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Sendika \u00fcyesi i\u015f\u00e7ilerin ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu ve sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkisizle\u015ftirildi\u011fini belirterek Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 51. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, konuya ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131sal i\u00e7tihad\u0131n, mevzuat\u0131n ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir nedeni de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Anayasa Mahkemesi T\u00fcrkiye Devrimci Kara, Hava ve Demiryolu Ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u015f\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 [GK], B. No: 2020\/34550, 15\/2\/2024) karar\u0131nda mevzuat\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken dava s\u00fcrecinin s\u00fcr\u00fcncemede b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu sendikan\u0131n ve ba\u015fvurucu ile birlikte i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan i\u015f\u00e7ilerin T\u0130S kapsam\u0131nda sendikal faaliyette bulunma olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin getirdi\u011fi sendikal haklara eri\u015fimini yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci boyunca imk\u00e2ns\u0131z k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenlerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 51. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00a7 45-52). Anayasa Mahkemesinin an\u0131lan ba\u015fvuruda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede; uygulamada ayn\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetlere ili\u015fkin davalar\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bu davalara ili\u015fkin ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n yayg\u0131nl\u0131k arz etti\u011fine ve bu durumun yap\u0131sal soruna neden oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir (\u00a7 56-63). An\u0131lan kararda T\u0130S yapma hakk\u0131n\u0131n etkili bir \u015fekilde kullan\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in bir T\u0130S\u2019in bitmesinden sonra yeni T\u0130S\u2019in y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesini sa\u011flama imk\u00e2n\u0131 verecek bir yasal sistem bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir (\u00a7 64 – 81).<\/p>\n
9. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucunun yetkili sendika oldu\u011fu tespit edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, uzun s\u00fcren dava boyunca ba\u015fvurucu T\u0130S imzalayamam\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu sendikan\u0131n mensubu olan i\u015f\u00e7iler T\u0130S \u00e7at\u0131s\u0131 alt\u0131nda toplanarak T\u0130S’in sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sendikal haklardan faydalanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla eldeki ba\u015fvuru bak\u0131m\u0131ndan T\u00fcrkiye Devrimci Kara, Hava ve Demiryolu Ta\u015f\u0131mac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u015f\u00e7ileri Sendikas\u0131 karar\u0131nda belirlenen ilkelerden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir y\u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Belirtilen hususlar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile 5.000.000 TL maddi, 13.500.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesi, yetki tespitine itiraz davalar\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n kanundan kaynaklanan bir yap\u0131sal sorun oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruda idari ve hukuki d\u00fczenleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte yap\u0131sal sorun tespit edildi\u011finden; ayr\u0131ca uzun s\u00fcre alsa da nihayetinde ba\u015fvurucu sendikan\u0131n yetkili oldu\u011funa da karar verildi\u011finden yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Yap\u0131sal sorundan kaynaklanan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali nedeniyle yaln\u0131zca ihlal tespitiyle giderilemeyecek olan manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 51. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, di\u011fer tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 1.480,40 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 31.480,40 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 19\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2023\/20195 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 L\u0130MAN-\u0130\u015e SEND\u0130KASI GENEL MERKEZ\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/20195 \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : G\u00fcls\u00fcm Gizem G\u00dcRSOY Ba\u015fvurucu : L\u0130MAN-\u0130\u015e SEND\u0130KASI GENEL MERKEZ\u0130 Vekili : Av. Derya DEM\u0130R \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, yetki tespitine itiraz talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 nedeniyle sendika hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu sendika, davac\u0131 i\u015fyerinde toplu i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi (T\u0130S) akdedebilmek i\u00e7in yetkili sendika oldu\u011funun tespiti talebiyle \u00c7al\u0131\u015fma ve Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) ba\u015fvurmu\u015f; Bakanl\u0131k, ba\u015fvurucunun yeterli \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederek yetki belgesi vermi\u015ftir. 3. Bunun \u00fczerine davac\u0131 i\u015fyeri, yetki tespitine itiraz davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 ile 18\/10\/2012 tarihli ve 6356 say\u0131l\u0131 Sendikalar ve Toplu \u0130\u015f S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Kanunu uyar\u0131nca T\u0130S s\u00fcreci dava sonu\u00e7lanana kadar durmakta ve mahkemenin hangi sendikan\u0131n T\u0130S yapma yetkisine sahip oldu\u011funu tespit etmesi beklenmektedir. 4. A\u00e7\u0131lan dava be\u015f y\u0131l s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ve bu s\u00fcrenin sonunda ba\u015fvurucu sendikan\u0131n yetkili oldu\u011funa karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin nihai karar\u0131 16\/2\/2023 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmesi \u00fczerine 15\/3\/2023 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. 5. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n