T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MEHMET FAT\u0130H BULUT VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/48895)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Mehmet Fatih BULUT<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Mustafa TAV<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Hasan SELEK<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u0130rem \u00c7\u0130\u00c7EK DOKSANB\u0130R<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
3. Kerem Said ERDO\u011eAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurular 30\/8\/2016 tarihi itibar\u0131yla mezun olacak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilerin ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesi gere\u011fince nas\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmek yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucular 30\/08\/2016 tarihi itibar\u0131yla astsubayl\u0131\u011fa\/subayl\u0131\u011fa nasbedilmeyi bekleyen e\u011fitimlerini tamamlam\u0131\u015f asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci stat\u00fcs\u00fcndedir.<\/p>\n
3. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 31\/7\/2016 tarihli ve669 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve Mill\u00ee Savunma \u00dcniversitesi Kurulmas\u0131 ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mezk\u00fbr 669 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 105. maddesinde 30 A\u011fustos itibar\u0131yla mezun olacak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilerin nasb\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131, bunlara durumlar\u0131na uygun fak\u00fclte ve y\u00fcksek okullarca diploma verilece\u011fi kural\u0131na yer verilmi\u015ftir. Bu kural uyar\u0131nca ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n nasb\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular, nasbedilmemelerine ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali istemiyle idare mahkemelerinde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Mahkemeler ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n nasb\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnameden h\u00fckm\u00fcnden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn idareye herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapma veya ba\u015fka y\u00f6nde i\u015flem tesis etme olana\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ortada idari davaya konu olabilecek bir i\u015flemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemeyece\u011fini belirterek davalar\u0131 incelenmeksizin ret ya da ret kararlar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7land\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan kararlar istinaf ve temyiz incelemelerinden ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular, nihai kararlar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frenmelerinden itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Komisyonca 2022\/33650 ve 2022\/41207 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvurular\u0131n konu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden irtibat\u0131 nedeniyle 2021\/48895 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvuru ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve incelemenin 2021\/48895 numaral\u0131 ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerinden B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucular, nasbedilmemelerine ili\u015fkin i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalarda esasa dair yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
7. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddine ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin kararlar\u0131nda bariz takdir hatas\u0131 veya a\u00e7\u0131k keyf\u00eelik olu\u015fturan bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n kanun yolu \u015fik\u00e2yeti niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitinin Anayasa Mahkemesinin takdirinde oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin (A\u0130HM) \u0130nan\/T\u00fcrkiye (B. No: 35726\/20) ba\u015fvurusunda 30\/8\/2016 tarihinde atanmay\u0131 bekleyen ba\u015fvuran\u0131n 29\/10\/2016 tarihli ve 675 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname (675 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) ile atamas\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verdi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. A\u0130HM karar\u0131nda, atamalar\u0131 iptal edilen adaylar\u0131n bir sonraki y\u0131l tekrar ba\u015fvurmalar\u0131n\u0131 ve e\u011fitimlerini tamamlad\u0131ktan sonra atanmamalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde idare mahkemeleri \u00f6n\u00fcnde ilgili tedbirlere itiraz etmelerini engelleyen bir h\u00fckm\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle belirli bir alanda ve k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre i\u00e7in mahkemeye eri\u015fime getirilen k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n bu ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda orant\u0131s\u0131z olarak de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi kanaatiyle kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu Hasan Selek, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 verdi\u011fi beyanda ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvuruya konu ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesi astsubayl\u0131\u011fa\/subayl\u0131\u011fa nasbedilmeme nedeniyle yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bu stat\u00fclere kabullerindeki farkl\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 dikkate alarak ele alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00d6mer K\u0131l\u0131n\u00e7 ([GK], B. No: 2018\/30695, 29\/9\/2021) karar\u0131na konu olayda, T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetlerinde (TSK) uzman erba\u015f olarak g\u00f6rev yapan ba\u015fvurucu, girdi\u011fi s\u0131nav\u0131 kazanarak astsubay olmak amac\u0131yla kurs alm\u0131\u015f ancak astsubayl\u0131k stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u015flemlerinin 675 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 6. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendi ile iptal edilmesi \u00fczerine nasbedilmeyerek TSK’daki g\u00f6revine d\u00f6nm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu, nasb\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi \u00fczerine bireysel ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00d6mer K\u0131l\u0131n\u00e7, \u00a7\u00a7 17-25). Anayasa Mahkemesi, bahsi ge\u00e7en kararda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede astsubay stat\u00fcs\u00fcne ge\u00e7i\u015f i\u015fleminin iptalinin -kamu kurumlar\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmalardan farkl\u0131 olarak- ba\u015fvurucuyu bu stat\u00fcden ilanihaye yoksun b\u0131rakacak bir etkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, nitekim ba\u015fvurucunun ilgili prosed\u00fcre yeniden tabi tutulmak suretiyle astsubayl\u0131k stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc elde etti\u011fini belirterek ihlal olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00d6mer K\u0131l\u0131n\u00e7, \u00a7 127).<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 ([GK], B. No: 2019\/7991, 23\/2\/2023) karar\u0131na konu olayda ise ba\u015fvurucunun subay olmak i\u00e7in kurs ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak temin faaliyetlerinin 675 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 6. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi ile iptal edilmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu nasbedilmemi\u015f ve TSK ile ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi, 1\/2\/2018 tarihli ve 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l (OHAL) kapsam\u0131ndaki kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamelerle ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filerin hukuki stat\u00fclerine ili\u015fkin olarak do\u011frudan d\u00fczenlenen i\u015flemlerin OHAL Komisyonunun yetkisinde oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f (Ayhan Orhanl\u0131, \u00a7\u00a777, 78), ayr\u0131cadavay\u0131 g\u00f6ren mahkemenin dava konusu i\u015flemin do\u011frudan kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararname ile tesis edildi\u011fini tespit ettikten sonra ba\u015fvuruyu 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun gere\u011fince OHAL Komisyonuna g\u00f6ndermesinin -yarg\u0131sal denetime imk\u00e2n sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131ndan- ba\u015fvurucuyu keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 koruyacak usule ili\u015fkin bir g\u00fcvence olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kararda, yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda bir de\u011ferlendirme yapmadan davay\u0131 incelenmeksizin reddetmelerinin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemez nitelikte oldu\u011funu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (Ayhan Orhanl\u0131, \u00a7 81). Sonu\u00e7 olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun temin faaliyetinin OHAL kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesi ile iptal edilmesi ve nasb\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvurucuya anayasal g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayacak yorumla OHAL Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmek yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi suretiyle yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Ayhan Orhanl\u0131, \u00a7 83).<\/p>\n
12. Yine Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00d6mer Faruk Bayar (B. No: 2019\/14214, 20\/9\/2023) karar\u0131nda da 30\/8\/2016 tarihi itibar\u0131yla mezun olacak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilerin OHAL kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesi gere\u011fince nas\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmek yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi suretiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen m\u00fcdahalenin Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 karar\u0131nda belirtilen gerek\u00e7elerle OHAL d\u00f6neminde temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucunun adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (\u00d6mer Faruk Bayar, \u00a7\u00a7 77, 78).<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda 30\/8\/2016 tarihi itibar\u0131yla mezun olacak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci stat\u00fcs\u00fcnde olan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n da OHAL kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesi gere\u011fince nasb\u0131 yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar OHAL Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmek yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmi\u015ftir. Bu sebeple eldeki ba\u015fvurular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Ayhan Orhanl\u0131 ve \u00d6mer Faruk Bayar kararlar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n baz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalarda mahkemeler davan\u0131n incelenmeksizin reddine karar vermemekle birlikte dava konusu i\u015flemin 675 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’daki kural uyar\u0131nca tesis edildi\u011fi ve\/veya bu kural uyar\u0131nca idarenin takdir yetkisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerinin (bkz. \u00a7 4) esasa ili\u015fkin bir de\u011ferlendirme olarak g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi ve do\u011frudan kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamenin ile tesis edilen i\u015flemlere kar\u015f\u0131 dosyalar\u0131n OHAL Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmeyerek yarg\u0131sal denetime imk\u00e2n sa\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu sebeple s\u00f6z konusu ba\u015fvurulara ili\u015fkin olarak ayn\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Engin Kaplan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2018\/26741, 19\/12\/2023, \u00a7 17)<\/p>\n
15. Ayr\u0131ca OHAL Komisyonunun g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresi 22\/1\/2023 tarihinde sona ermi\u015fse de 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a eklenen ge\u00e7ici 5. Maddede Komisyonun g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresinin sona ermesinden sonra g\u00f6revleri kapsam\u0131ndaki hususlarda mahkemelerce verilecek kararlar \u00fczerine yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekli i\u015f ve i\u015flemleri y\u00fcr\u00fctecek kurum ve kurulu\u015flar belirlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n nas\u0131blar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar\u0131n keyf\u00eeli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuruculara anayasal g\u00fcvenceler sa\u011flayacak yorumla OHAL Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmek yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi suretiyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen m\u00fcdahalenin OHAL d\u00f6neminde temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerin kullan\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131, s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen durumun gerektirdi\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvuru Anayasa’n\u0131n 15. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yeti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n di\u011fer baz\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca incelenmesine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucular; ihlalin tespiti, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n yenilenmesi, maddi ve manevi tazminat taleplerinde bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
21. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n manevi tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular, maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131klar\u0131ndan maddi tazminat taleplerinin de reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in 7075 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ge\u00e7ici 5. maddesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olu\u015fturulan ba\u015fvuru yolu dikkate al\u0131narak yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere ekli tablonun (D) s\u00fctununda g\u00f6sterilen ilgili Mahkemelere G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Ekli tablonun (F) s\u00fctununda isimleri yer alan avukatlar taraf\u0131ndan temsil edilen ba\u015fvuruculara 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin AYRI AYRI \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, ekli tablonun (E) s\u00fctununda belirtilen yarg\u0131lama giderinin ilgili sat\u0131rda g\u00f6sterilen ba\u015fvuruculara \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihlerinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 27\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 27\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/48895 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MEHMET FAT\u0130H BULUT VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/48895) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 27\/11\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Mehmet Fatih BULUT Vekili : Av. Mustafa TAV \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Hasan SELEK Vekili : Av. \u0130rem \u00c7\u0130\u00c7EK DOKSANB\u0130R \u00a0 \u00a0 3. Kerem Said ERDO\u011eAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvurular 30\/8\/2016 tarihi itibar\u0131yla mezun olacak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilerin ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcnde kararnamesi gere\u011fince nas\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmamas\u0131 \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc H\u00e2l \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna g\u00f6nderilmek yerine incelenmeksizin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucular 30\/08\/2016 tarihi itibar\u0131yla astsubayl\u0131\u011fa\/subayl\u0131\u011fa nasbedilmeyi bekleyen e\u011fitimlerini tamamlam\u0131\u015f asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci stat\u00fcs\u00fcndedir. 3. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 31\/7\/2016 tarihli ve669 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve Mill\u00ee Savunma \u00dcniversitesi Kurulmas\u0131 ile Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mezk\u00fbr 669 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin 105. maddesinde 30 A\u011fustos itibar\u0131yla mezun olacak asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilerin nasb\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lmayaca\u011f\u0131, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n