ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/202<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/192<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 4\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: K\u0131z\u0131ltepe \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 24\/5\/1962 tarihli ve 51 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 1. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 76. maddesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 10., 13., 36., 37. ve 90. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: \u00d6deme emri tebli\u011fine ra\u011fmen mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmayan bor\u00e7lular\u0131n hapisle tazyik olunmas\u0131 talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 76. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201cHapis ile tazyik:<\/p>\n
Madde 76 \u2013 (De\u011fi\u015fik: 24\/5\/1962-51\/ 1md.) <\/p>\n
Mal beyan\u0131nda bulunm\u0131yan bor\u00e7lu, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine beyanda bulununcaya kadar icra mahkemesi hakimi taraf\u0131ndan bir defaya mahsus olmak \u00fczere hapisle tazyik olunur. Ancak bu hapis \u00fc\u00e7 ay\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Muhammed Nuri \u00d6ZG\u00dcR taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un \u201cBa\u015fvuruya engel durumlar\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 41. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u201c\u0130tiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemede itiraz konusu kural\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fka dava dosyalar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olan itiraz ba\u015fvurusu bu dosyalar i\u00e7in de bekletici mesele say\u0131l\u0131r\u201d denilmektedir. An\u0131lan f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca ayn\u0131 mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan ayn\u0131 kurala ili\u015fkin birden fazla itiraz ba\u015fvurusunda bulunulmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
3. 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un \u201cAnayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemelerce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde ise Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda izlenecek y\u00f6ntem belirtilmi\u015f ve an\u0131lan maddenin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmayan itiraz ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin gerek\u00e7eleriyle reddedilece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. S\u00f6z konusu \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 49. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan ilk incelemede, ba\u015fvuruda eksikliklerin bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde itiraz yoluna ili\u015fkin i\u015flerde esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar verilece\u011fi; (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise an\u0131lan (b) bendi uyar\u0131nca verilen karar\u0131n itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran mahkemenin eksiklikleri tamamlayarak yeniden ba\u015fvurmas\u0131na engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Yap\u0131lan incelemede Mahkemenin itiraz konusu kurala ili\u015fkin ilk ba\u015fvuruyu yapt\u0131ktan sonra bu ba\u015fvuruyu di\u011fer dava dosyalar\u0131 i\u00e7in bekletici mesele yapmas\u0131 gerekirken, kural\u0131n uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 birden fazla dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in tek bir ba\u015fvuruda bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu h\u00e2liyle ba\u015fvurunun 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 41. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda belirtilen y\u00f6nteme uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan incelenme imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Kald\u0131 ki itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran Mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 10., 13., 36., 37. ve 90. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmekle birlikte s\u00f6z konusu maddelere hangi nedenlerle ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu da ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 41. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 24\/5\/1962 tarihli ve 51 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 1. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 76. maddesinin iptaline karar verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 41. maddesinin (2) ve 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan REDD\u0130NE 4\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 4\/12\/2024 tarihli, 2024\/202 esas – 2024\/192 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/202 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2024\/192 Karar Tarihi : 4\/12\/2024 R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi. \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: K\u0131z\u0131ltepe \u0130cra Ceza Mahkemesi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 9\/6\/1932 tarihli ve 2004 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130cra ve \u0130flas Kanunu\u2019nun 24\/5\/1962 tarihli ve 51 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 1. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilen 76. maddesinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 10., 13., 36., 37. ve 90. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptaline karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: \u00d6deme emri tebli\u011fine ra\u011fmen mal beyan\u0131nda bulunmayan bor\u00e7lular\u0131n hapisle tazyik olunmas\u0131 talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda itiraz konusu kural\u0131n Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcKM\u00dc Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu 76. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u201cHapis ile tazyik: Madde 76 \u2013 (De\u011fi\u015fik: 24\/5\/1962-51\/ 1md.) Mal beyan\u0131nda bulunm\u0131yan bor\u00e7lu, alacakl\u0131n\u0131n talebi \u00fczerine beyanda bulununcaya kadar icra mahkemesi hakimi taraf\u0131ndan bir defaya mahsus olmak \u00fczere hapisle tazyik olunur. Ancak bu hapis \u00fc\u00e7 ay\u0131 ge\u00e7emez.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Muhammed Nuri \u00d6ZG\u00dcR taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fckm\u00fc okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: 2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un \u201cBa\u015fvuruya engel durumlar\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-26297","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n