T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
PERV\u0130N ODUNCU BA\u015eVURUSU (2)<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/48485)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Pervin ODUNCU<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Zeynep Sedef \u00d6ZDO\u011eAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ile tutuklama tedbirlerinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemenin sadece belli davalara bakmakla g\u00f6revlendirilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 3\/11\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131 ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
A. 6-7 Ekim Olaylar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Genel Bilgiler <\/p>\n
5. Suriye’nin T\u00fcrkiye s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131nda bulunan Ayn el-Arap (Kobani) kentinde -PKK’n\u0131n Suriye kolu oldu\u011fu kabul edilen- PYD ile DAE\u015e aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar, 2014 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Eyl\u00fcl ay\u0131 sonunda ve Ekim ay\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda yo\u011funla\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu s\u0131rada PKK’n\u0131n \u00fcst d\u00fczey y\u00f6neticilerinden Murat Karay\u0131lan’\u0131n sosyal medya hesab\u0131ndan 5\/10\/2014 tarihinde saat 00.07’de “Gen\u00e7leri kad\u0131nlar\u0131 7 den 70 e herkesi Kobane’ye sahip \u00e7\u0131kmaya onurumuzu namusumuzu korumaya metropolleri i\u015fgal etmeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz.” \u015feklinde bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
6. PKK g\u00fcd\u00fcm\u00fcnde yay\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen bir internet haber sitesinde 6\/10\/2014 tarihinde “Komalen Ciwan Koordinasyonu” (PKK’n\u0131n gen\u00e7lik yap\u0131lanmas\u0131) ad\u0131na bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klamada “Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere 23 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr Kobani merkezli DA\u0130\u015e (DAE\u015e) fa\u015fizmi son barbarl\u0131\u011f\u0131yla devam etmektedir. … t\u00fcm k\u00fcrt gen\u00e7li\u011fi \u015fehit Jiyan, \u015fehit Gerilla ve \u015fehit Militan yolda\u015flar\u0131n ruhuyla zafere kadar Arin Mirkan (Kobani’deki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda d\u00fczenledi\u011fi intihar sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131nda \u00f6len YPG mensubu) \u00e7izgisinde y\u00fcr\u00fcmeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz. Kobani ile ba\u015flayan devrim dalgas\u0131 t\u00fcm K\u00fcrdistan’a yay\u0131lmal\u0131 ve bu temelde K\u00fcrdistan gen\u00e7li\u011fini ayaklanmas\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131nda bulunuyoruz.” ifadelerine yer verilmi\u015ftir. Ayn\u0131 sitede ayr\u0131ca “K\u00fcrdistan Kurumlar” ad\u0131na yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen benzer i\u00e7erikteki farkl\u0131 bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya da yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. 6\/10\/2014 tarihinde Halklar\u0131n Demokratik Partisi (HDP) Merkez Y\u00fcr\u00fctme Kurulu (MYK) da ayn\u0131 olaylara ili\u015fkin bir toplant\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplant\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda HDP’nin sosyal medya hesab\u0131ndan “HALKLARIMIZA AC\u0130L \u00c7A\u011eRI! \u015eUANDA TOPLANTI HAL\u0130NDE OLAN HDP MYK\u2019DAN HALKLARIMIZA AC\u0130L \u00c7A\u011eRI! Koban\u00e9\u2019de durum son derece kritiktir. I\u015e\u0130D (DAE\u015e) sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 ve AKP iktidar\u0131n\u0131n Koban\u00e9\u2019ye ambargo tutumunu protesto etmek \u00fczere halklar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kmaya ve soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f olanlara destek vermeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz”, “Koban\u00e9\u2019de ya\u015fanan katliam giri\u015fimine kar\u015f\u0131 7 den 70 e b\u00fct\u00fcn halklar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 soka\u011fa, alan tutmaya ve harekete ge\u00e7meye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz” ve “Bundan b\u00f6yle her yer Kobane’dir. Kobane’deki ku\u015fatma ve vah\u015fi sald\u0131rganl\u0131k son bulana kadar S\u00dcRES\u0130Z D\u0130REN\u0130\u015eE \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz.” \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klama ve \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Yukar\u0131da belirtilen internet haber sitesinin 7\/10\/2014 ve 8\/10\/2014 tarihli yay\u0131nlar\u0131nda PKK\/KCK taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ba\u015fkald\u0131r\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131na ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalara yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Bu \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar \u00fczerine Suriye’deki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar dolay\u0131s\u0131yla tepkilerini dile getirdi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcren gruplar 6\/10\/2014 tarihinden itibaren T\u00fcrkiye’nin bir\u00e7ok yerinde g\u00fcnlerce devam eden ve kamuoyunda “6-7 Ekim olaylar\u0131” olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan \u015fiddet eylemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir. Bu eylemler s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00fclkenin pek \u00e7ok yerinde kamu binalar\u0131na, banka \u015fubelerine, i\u015fyerlerine, ara\u00e7lara, g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerine ve sivillere ta\u015f, sopa, molotofkokteyli ve silahlarla sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunulmu\u015ftur. Bu s\u0131rada kamu makamlar\u0131nca g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok \u015fehirde e\u011fitime ara verilmi\u015f ve soka\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kma yasa\u011f\u0131 ilan edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n ve soru\u015fturma mercilerinin tespitlerine g\u00f6re -aralar\u0131nda \u0130stanbul, Ankara, \u0130zmir, Adana, Mersin, \u015eanl\u0131urfa, Van, Erzurum, Diyarbak\u0131r ve Gaziantep gibi b\u00fcy\u00fck kentlerin de oldu\u011fu- otuz alt\u0131 ayr\u0131 ilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen \u015fiddet eylemleri sonucunda (2’si g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlisi) 45 ki\u015fi hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybederken (331’i g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlisi) 769 ki\u015fi yaralanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda 5 \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubunun hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, 3 \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubunun ise yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u00d6te yandan \u00fclke genelinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen 2.389 \u015fiddet eylemine 121.899 ki\u015finin kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olaylarda (737’si g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerine ait olmak \u00fczere) 1.881 arac\u0131n zarar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, (27’si kaymakaml\u0131k, 52’si emniyet, 283’\u00fc okul, 73’\u00fc siyasi parti, 12’si belediye binas\u0131 olmak \u00fczere) 2.558 binaya sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunuldu\u011fu ve zarar verildi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Olaylara ili\u015fkin olarak 4.291 \u015f\u00fcpheli g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, bunlardan 1.105’i hakk\u0131nda tutuklama tedbiri uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (6-7 Ekim olaylar\u0131na ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalar i\u00e7in bkz. Zeynep \u00d6lbeci, B. No: 2021\/10825, 13\/12\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 5-13).<\/p>\n
B. Ba\u015fvurucunun Tutuklanmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00fcre\u00e7<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda HDP MYK \u00fcyeli\u011fi yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan 6\/10\/2014-7\/10\/2014 tarihlerinde ba\u015flay\u0131p sonraki g\u00fcnlerde bir\u00e7ok \u015fehre yay\u0131lan ve \u00e7ok say\u0131da ki\u015finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi veya yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fiddet olaylar\u0131 (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 9, 10) dolay\u0131s\u0131yla 9\/10\/2014 tarihinde bir (2014\/146757 say\u0131l\u0131) soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Soru\u015fturman\u0131n devam\u0131nda 25\/9\/2020 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta verdi\u011fi 1\/10\/2020 tarihli ifadesinde \u00f6zetle 6\/10\/2014 tarihinde HDP MYK toplant\u0131s\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, toplant\u0131da Kobani kentinde PYD ile DAE\u015e aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalara ili\u015fkin bir \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 yap\u0131lmas\u0131 hususunda bir karar al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131dan haberdar olmamakla birlikte olaylar\u0131n HDP MYK ad\u0131na yap\u0131lan \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131dan \u00f6nce ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 1\/10\/2020 tarihinde, ba\u015fvurucuyu devletin birli\u011fini ve \u00fclke b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bozma, bir su\u00e7u gizlemek veya ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7un delillerini gizlemek ya da yakalanmamak amac\u0131yla \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye azmettirme, bir su\u00e7u gizlemek veya ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7un delillerini gizlemek ya da yakalanmamak amac\u0131yla \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcse azmettirme, var olan veya var say\u0131lan su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fctlerinin olu\u015fturduklar\u0131 korkutucu g\u00fc\u00e7ten yararlanarak yol kesmek suretiyle su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yarar sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla gece vakti silahla birden fazla ki\u015fi ile ya\u011fmaya azmettirme ve cebir, tehdit veya hile kullanarak ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lmaya azmettirme su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan tutuklanmas\u0131 istemiyle Ankara Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine sevk etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucunun sorgusu 2\/10\/2020 tarihinde Ankara 4. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (H\u00e2kimlik) taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. H\u00e2kimlik, sorgu sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lardan tutuklanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu 9\/10\/2020 tarihinde tutuklama karar\u0131na itiraz etmi\u015f, Ankara 5. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 16\/10\/2020 tarihinde itiraz\u0131n kesin olarak reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n -ba\u015fvurucuyla birlikte 108 \u015f\u00fcpheli ve 2.676 m\u00fc\u015fteki\/ma\u011fdurun yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131- 30\/12\/2020 tarihli iddianamesi ile ba\u015fvurucunun devletin birli\u011fini ve \u00fclke b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc bozma, bir su\u00e7u gizlemek veya ba\u015fka bir su\u00e7un delillerini gizlemek ya da yakalanmamak amac\u0131yla \u00f6ld\u00fcrme ve \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye te\u015febb\u00fcs etme, kasten yaralama, kamu mal\u0131na zarar verme, h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k, birden fazla ki\u015fi ile birlikte gece vaktinde su\u00e7 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yarar sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla ya\u011fma, devletin egemenlik alametlerini a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lama, \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma h\u00fcrriyetini ihlal etme ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011finden bahisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle ayn\u0131 yer a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinde kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. \u0130lk olarak PKK\/KCK’ya ili\u015fkin genel a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddianamede 6-7 Ekim olaylar\u0131na giden s\u00fcre\u00e7 ve belirtilen tarihlerde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen olaylar kronolojik olarak anlat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderlerinin bu s\u00fcre\u00e7teki talimat ve \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131na de\u011finilmi\u015f ve son olarak \u015f\u00fcphelilerin eylemlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Ankara 22. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (Mahkeme) 7\/1\/2021 tarihinde iddianamenin kabul\u00fcne karar vermi\u015f ve kovu\u015fturma evresi ba\u015flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme ayn\u0131 tarihte yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 inceleme sonucunda ba\u015fvurucu ve di\u011fer 26 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Mahkeme 21\/5\/2021, 25\/6\/2021 ve 6\/9\/2021 tarihlerinde 2\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleri tekrarlayarak ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun 6\/9\/2021 tarihli karara yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 18\/9\/2021 tarihli itiraz Ankara 23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan 27\/9\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu, itiraz\u0131n reddine dair karar\u0131 4\/10\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 3\/11\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te Mahkeme, 2\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucunun tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na muhtelif oturumlarda karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
24. Mahkeme 16\/5\/2024 tarihli oturumda ba\u015fvurucunun muhtelif su\u00e7lardan mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lama bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla istinaf kanun yolu a\u015famas\u0131nda devam etmektedir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
25. \u0130lgili ulusal ve uluslararas\u0131 hukuk i\u00e7in bkz. Yurt Atay\u00fcn, B. No: 2017\/34216, 29\/5\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 36-44; Selahattin Demirta\u015f (3), B. No: 2017\/38610, 9\/6\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 108-134; Pervin Oduncu, B. No: 2020\/35081, 22\/11\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 32-43; Alp Alt\u0131n\u00f6rs (2), B. No: 2021\/131, 13\/12\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 33-44.<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
26. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Adli Yard\u0131m Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
28. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Mehmet \u015eerif Ay (B. No: 2012\/1181, 17\/9\/2013) karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkeler dikkate al\u0131narak ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Tedbirinin Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Oldu\u011funa \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 <\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa Mahkemesi, kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresinin a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Hikmet Kopar ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/14061, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 64-72; Hidayet Karaca [GK], B. No: 2015\/144, 14\/7\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 53-64; G\u00fcnay Da\u011f ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/1631, 17\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 141-150; \u0130brahim S\u00f6nmez ve Nazmiye Kaya, B. No: 2013\/3193, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 34-47).<\/p>\n
31. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirinin hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddialar\u0131yla ilgili olarak an\u0131lan kararlarda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
32. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Tutuklaman\u0131n Hukuki Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucu; \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu siyasi partinin sosyal medya payla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131, kendisinin ve arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ve parti \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 gibi ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gereken s\u00f6z ve eylemleri nedeniyle haks\u0131z \u015fekilde tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve bu hakla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ifade h\u00fcrriyeti, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme h\u00fcrriyeti ve siyasi faaliyette bulunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
34. Anayasa Mahkemesi olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). Ba\u015fvurucu, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131ndaki s\u00f6z ve eylemlerinden dolay\u0131 2\/10\/2020 tarihinde haks\u0131z \u015fekilde tutuklanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin 2\/10\/2020 tarihli tutuklama tedbirinin hukukili\u011fiyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
35. Somut olayda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen tutuklama tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fka bir bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunuldu\u011fu ve an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yet hakk\u0131nda -2020\/35081 say\u0131l\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden- Birinci B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan inceleme sonunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksunluk nedeniyle kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi tespit edildi\u011finden ba\u015fvurunun bu iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
36. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru olmas\u0131 nedeniyle reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
D. Tutuklulu\u011fun Makul S\u00fcreyi A\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
37. Ba\u015fvurucu; siyasal d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama konusu yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava s\u00fcrecindeki tutuklulu\u011funun haks\u0131z kararlar ile devam ettirildi\u011fini ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve yedinci f\u0131kralar\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131nda, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
38. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetiyle ilgili olarak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. ve 142. maddelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat yolunun t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi, bu durumda s\u00f6z konusu iddia bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ola\u011fan ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131 t\u00fcketilmeden bireysel ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
39. Bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan an\u0131lan iddian\u0131n esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede ise ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki tutuklulu\u011fun devam\u0131na dair kararlarda ka\u00e7ma ve delilleri karartma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulundu\u011fu, isnat edilen su\u00e7un katalog su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, kanunda su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezan\u0131n y\u00fcksek oldu\u011fu, tutuklama tedbiri yerine adli kontrol tedbiri uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n yetersiz kalaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerine yer verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde ayr\u0131ca -ba\u015fvuru tarihi itibar\u0131yla- 1 y\u0131l 4 ay 20 g\u00fcnl\u00fck tutukluluk s\u00fcresinin makul olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin de\u011ferlendirmenin Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesinin (A\u0130HM) benzer i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
40. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 tutuklama tedbirinden kaynaklanan hak ihlalinin tazminat davas\u0131 yoluyla giderilemeyece\u011fini ve bu nedenle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ba\u015fvuru yolunun t\u00fcketilmesinin gerekli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvuru formundakine benzer beyanlarda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
41. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
42. Anayasa Mahkemesi, tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi veya makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu tahliye edilmi\u015f veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc h\u00e2le gelmi\u015f ise as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Erkam Abdurrahman Ak, B. No: 2014\/8515, 28\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 48-62; \u0130rfan Ger\u00e7ek, B. No: 2014\/6500, 29\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 33-45; Ahmet Kubilay Tezcan, B. No: 2014\/3473, 25\/1\/2018, \u00a7 26). Somut olayda 16\/5\/2024 tarihinde mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilen (bkz. \u00a7 24) ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
43. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik nedenleri incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
E. Adil Yarg\u0131lanma Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
44. Ba\u015fvurucu; Anayasa’n\u0131n 37. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen kanuni h\u00e2kim g\u00fcvencesine ra\u011fmen H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kurulu karar\u0131 ile yaln\u0131z Kobani davas\u0131 ve ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 davalar\u0131 g\u00f6rmekle g\u00f6revlendirilen \u00f6zel bir mahkeme kuruldu\u011funu, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130leti\u015fim Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u0130\u00e7i\u015fleri Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sosyal medya \u00fczerinden payla\u015f\u0131lan “Hesap Vakti” isimli bir video ile bu Mahkemenin etki alt\u0131na al\u0131nmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek kanuni h\u00e2kim g\u00fcvencesi ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
45. Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunabilmek i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle ola\u011fan kanun yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi zorunludur (Ay\u015fe Z\u0131raman ve Cennet Ye\u015filyurt, B. No: 2012\/403, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 16, 17).<\/p>\n
46. Somut olayda UYAP \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda ihlal iddialar\u0131na konu olan davan\u0131n -bireysel ba\u015fvuruyu inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla- istinaf kanun yolu a\u015famas\u0131nda derdest oldu\u011fu, bu anlamda i\u015flemleri devam eden yarg\u0131lama a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hukuk sisteminde mevcut yarg\u0131sal yollar t\u00fcketilmeksizin bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
47. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n m\u00fckerrer ba\u015fvuru olmas\u0131 nedeniyle REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. Tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
4. Adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 19\/11\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 19\/11\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/48485 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 PERV\u0130N ODUNCU BA\u015eVURUSU (2) (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/48485) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 19\/11\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Pervin ODUNCU Vekili : Av. Zeynep Sedef \u00d6ZDO\u011eAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ile tutuklama tedbirlerinin hukuki olmamas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemenin sadece belli davalara bakmakla g\u00f6revlendirilmesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 3\/11\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131 ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: A. 6-7 Ekim Olaylar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Genel Bilgiler 5. Suriye’nin T\u00fcrkiye s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131nda bulunan Ayn el-Arap (Kobani) kentinde -PKK’n\u0131n Suriye kolu oldu\u011fu kabul edilen- PYD ile DAE\u015e aras\u0131ndaki \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar, …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25209","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n