T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
AK\u0130T TELEV\u0130ZYON VE RADYO A.\u015e. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/18189)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eeyda Nur \u00dcN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Akit Televizyon ve Radyo A.\u015e.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali Pacc\u0131<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucunun sahibi oldu\u011fu televizyon kanal\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanan bir haberde ge\u00e7en ifadelerden dolay\u0131 idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu olaylar\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi tarihte “Akit TV” logosuyla televizyon yay\u0131n\u0131 yapan medya hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bir kurulu\u015ftur. Radyo ve Televizyon \u00dcst Kurulu (RT\u00dcK) 11\/1\/2017 tarihinde; ba\u015fvurucuya ait televizyon kanal\u0131nda 21\/12\/2016 tarihinde saat 19.30’da yay\u0131mlanan “Ana Haber” b\u00fclteninde 15\/2\/2011 tarihli ve 6112 say\u0131l\u0131 Radyo ve Televizyonlar\u0131n Kurulu\u015f ve Yay\u0131n Hizmetleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 8. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendinde yer alan “\u0130nsan onuruna ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fine sayg\u0131l\u0131 olma ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz, ki\u015fi ya da kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ele\u015ftiri s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 \u00f6tesinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 veya iftira niteli\u011finde ifadeler i\u00e7eremez.” ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011finden bahisle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 32. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 14.359 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130dari para cezas\u0131na konu haber i\u00e7erik itibar\u0131yla \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k sistemi hayalinin kan ve g\u00f6zya\u015f\u0131na sebep oldu\u011funu savundu.<\/p>\n
CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda milletvekillerini ve parti meclisi \u00fcyelerinin de kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen kapal\u0131 toplant\u0131da, Ak Parti’nin anayasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi teklifi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda partinin izleyece\u011fi yol haritas\u0131 tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu burada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmada T\u00fcrkiye’de akan kan\u0131n durmas\u0131n\u0131n yolunun ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011fa dur demekten ge\u00e7ti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
Tehdit Etti<\/p>\n
Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu adeta tehdit eder gibi ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n da artaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n
K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu bu s\u00f6ylem ile Kandil’in s\u00f6zc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc \u00fcstleniyor. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc PKK’y\u0131 adeta parlamenter sistemin savunucuus gibi g\u00f6steriyor. Ter\u00f6r eylemlerinin talimatlar\u0131n\u0131n Washington, Paris, Londra, Berlin, Tel Aviv ve Br\u00fcksel’den verildi\u011fini biliyorduk. K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu’nun bu son a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 me\u011fer bir yer daha varm\u0131\u015f dedirtiyor.<\/p>\n
K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu ba\u015fkanl\u0131k sistemini kan d\u00f6kmeden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiremezsin dedikten sonra bombalar patl\u0131yor, asker ve polisler \u015fehit oluyor. Ayn\u0131 K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu bu konuda \u0131srar edersen ter\u00f6r eylemleri artacak tehditleri savuruyor. <\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan t\u0131pk\u0131 K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu gibi CHP i\u00e7indeki XXL birdi\u011fer vatan hainine de de\u011finmek gerekiyor. \u0130smi Eren Erdem, eski ulusalc\u0131, kripto Fet\u00f6’c\u00fc, s\u00f6zde solcu, \u0130ran Ajan\u0131 Eren Erdem. Fet\u00f6’c\u00fc Kar\u015f\u0131 adl\u0131 gazetenin kurulu\u015f s\u00fcrecinde \u00f6nemli rol oynad\u0131. O g\u00fcnlerde Fet\u00f6’c\u00fclerle gizli toplant\u0131lar organize edip gazetede yalan yanl\u0131\u015f tapeleri s\u0131k s\u0131k yay\u0131nlayarak se\u00e7ilmi\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmeti devirmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131. kendisine verilmi\u015f g\u00f6rev tamamlan\u0131nca da K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu kontenjan\u0131ndan CHP milletvekili se\u00e7ildi.<\/p>\n
Tescilli \u015eerefsiz<\/p>\n
Rus yay\u0131n kurulu\u015flar\u0131na ABD’ye T\u00fcrkiye’nin silah verdi\u011fi ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile petrol ticareti yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. “\u0130ddiam\u0131 ispatlayamazsam \u015ferefsizim’ dedi. <\/p>\n
O iddias\u0131 elinde patlad\u0131. CIA DAE\u015e’le petrol ticareti yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi T\u00fcrkiye’den \u00f6z\u00fcr diledi. \u015eimdi Eren Erdem’in \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p ‘ben \u015ferefsiz, bir hainim’ demesi bekleniyor.<\/p>\n
T\u00fcrkiye ile \u0130ran kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya gelse \u0130ran’dan taraf olurum diyen Eren Erdem’in bu kadar ucuz kurtulmamas\u0131 gerekiyor. Ajan oldu\u011fu bilinen bu zat\u0131n vekilli\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp bir an \u00f6nce mahkeme huzuruna \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekiyor. Fet\u00f6’c\u00fcl\u00fckten ve yanalc\u0131l\u0131ktan yarg\u0131lanmal\u0131. Su\u00e7lu ise i\u00e7eri at\u0131lmal\u0131. Yada s\u0131n\u0131rd\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilerek \u00fclke topraklar\u0131ndan kovularak ana vatan\u0131 Tahran’a iade edilmeli.”<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, idari i\u015flemin iptali i\u00e7in dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu; haberde yer alan ifadelerin ele\u015ftiri hakk\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ibaret oldu\u011funu, haberde yer alan Parti Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n olaylar \u00f6ncesindeki a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ve eylemleri nedeniyle olgusal temellere dayal\u0131 olarak b\u00f6yle bir haberin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, haberin siyasi ele\u015ftiri kapsam\u0131nda ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Davan\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) 12\/6\/2017 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda \u0130dare Mahkemesi; d\u00f6nemin Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi (CHP) Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131’na y\u00f6nelik olarak “tescilli hain”, “PKK’l\u0131 K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu” ifadelerinin ve CHP milletvekiline y\u00f6nelik olarak “tescilli hain”, “\u0130ran casusu”, “vatan haini”, “kriptolu FET\u00d6’c\u00fc”, “s\u00f6zde solcu”, “\u015ferefsiz bir hain” ifadelerinin ele\u015ftiri s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte oldu\u011fu ve 6112 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8\/1-\u00e7 maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kanaatiyle dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ve mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebinde bulunmas\u0131 \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 8. \u0130dari Dava Dairesi 11\/10\/2017 tarihinde “karar usul ve hukuka uygun olup istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fcn\u00fc gerektiren bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan” ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun karar\u0131 temyiz etmesi \u00fczerine Dan\u0131\u015ftay On\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc Dairesi 10\/2\/2021 tarihinde “karar usul ve hukuka uygun olup bozma nedenlerinden hi\u00e7birisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan” h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 1\/4\/2021 \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 29\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; somut olaya konu haberden \u00f6nce CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n, ba\u015fkanl\u0131k sistemi ve PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle ilgili bir k\u0131s\u0131m a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulundu\u011funu, PKK ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak ceza infaz kurumunda mahk\u00fbm ziyareti ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fini, s\u00f6z konusu haberin de an\u0131lan olaylar sonras\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve olgusal bir temelinin oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan haberin ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, siyasi ele\u015ftiri mahiyetinde oldu\u011funu, mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7enin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; mevcut ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucunun ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131s\u0131nda yer verilen Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
12. Somut ba\u015fvuruda bir haber program\u0131nda yer verilen ifadeler nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 ile ba\u015fvurucunun ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalede bulunulmu\u015ftur. M\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 6112 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 32. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca m\u00fcdahalenin “ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131” me\u015fru amac\u0131 ile yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu belirlemelerin ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 irdelenecektir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi; Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesinde yer alan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile onun \u00f6zel g\u00fcvencelere ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f \u015fekli olan ve Anayasa’n\u0131n 28. maddesinde yer alan bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn demokratik bir toplumun zorunlu temellerinden oldu\u011funu, toplumun ilerlemesi ve her bireyin geli\u015fmesi i\u00e7in gerekli temel \u015fartlardan birini olu\u015fturdu\u011funu daha \u00f6nce pek \u00e7ok kez ifade etmi\u015ftir. Bu ba\u011flamda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc herkes i\u00e7in ge\u00e7erlidir ve demokrasinin i\u015fleyi\u015fi i\u00e7in ya\u015famsal \u00f6nemdedir (Mehmet Ali Ayd\u0131n [GK], B. No: 2013\/9343, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7 69; Bekir Co\u015fkun [GK], B. No: 2014\/12151, 4\/6\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 34-36). Bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kamuoyuna \u00e7e\u015fitli fikir ve tutumlar\u0131n iletilmesi ile bunlara ili\u015fkin bir kanaat olu\u015fturulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in en iyi ara\u00e7lardan birini sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r (\u0130lhan Cihaner (2), B. No: 2013\/5574, 30\/6\/2014, \u00a7 63; Haci Bo\u011fatekin (2), B. No: 2014\/12162, 21\/11\/2017, \u00a7 38).<\/p>\n
14. \u0130fade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamas\u0131 ve orant\u0131l\u0131 bir m\u00fcdahale olmas\u0131 gerekir (Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7\u00a7 53-55; Mehmet Ali Ayd\u0131n, \u00a7\u00a7 70-72; AYM, E.2007\/4, K.2007\/81, 18\/10\/2007).<\/p>\n
15. M\u00fcdahaleyi olu\u015fturan tedbirin zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in amaca ula\u015fmaya elveri\u015fli olmas\u0131, ba\u015fvurulabilecek en son \u00e7are ve al\u0131nabilecek en hafif \u00f6nlem olarak kendisini g\u00f6stermesi gerekmektedir (baz\u0131 farkl\u0131l\u0131klarla birlikte bkz. Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2018\/17635, 26\/7\/2019, \u00a7 77; S\u0131rr\u0131 S\u00fcreyya \u00d6nder, [GK], B. No: 2018\/38143, 3\/10\/2019, \u00a7 58; Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7 51; Mehmet Ali Ayd\u0131n, \u00a7 68; Tansel \u00c7\u00f6la\u015fan, B. No: 2014\/6128, 7\/7\/2015, \u00a7 51).<\/p>\n
16. Derece mahkemeleri s\u00f6z konusu dengelemeyi yaparken ve ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin zorunlu bir toplumsal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lay\u0131p kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken belirli bir takdir yetkisine sahiptir. Ancak bu takdir pay\u0131, Anayasa Mahkemesinin denetimindedir (Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, B. No: 2014\/1577, 25\/10\/2017, \u00a7 57). An\u0131lan denetim s\u0131ras\u0131nda Anayasa Mahkemesi temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin gerek\u00e7esine odaklan\u0131r. Kamu makamlar\u0131n\u0131n, temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere -zorunlu bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fini ve orant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funu- ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e ile ortaya koymadan yapt\u0131klar\u0131 m\u00fcdahalelerin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne gerek\u00e7esiz olarak veya Anayasa Mahkemesince ortaya konulan kriterleri kar\u015f\u0131lamayan bir gerek\u00e7e ile yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahaleler Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. maddesi ile onun \u00f6zel g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc olan 28. maddesini ihlal edecektir (Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu, \u00a7 58; Bekir Co\u015fkun, \u00a7 56; Tansel \u00c7\u00f6la\u015fan, \u00a7 56; Z\u00fcbeyde F\u00fcsun \u00dcstel ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 120).<\/p>\n
17. Somut olayda RT\u00dcK; uzman raporu ve video g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc incelemesine dayanarak, “Ana Haber” b\u00fclteninde kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin (bkz. \u00a7 2) ki\u015fi ya da kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ele\u015ftiri s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 \u00f6tesinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc veya a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle ba\u015fvurucunun idari para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun idari i\u015flemin iptali talebiyle a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada \u0130dare Mahkemesi de s\u00f6z konusu ifadelerin k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte oldu\u011fu kanaatine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi mevcut ba\u015fvuruya benzer ba\u015fvurularda, ba\u015fvurucunun Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 28. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bu \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile di\u011fer taraf\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nan \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda adil bir dengenin g\u00f6zetilip g\u00f6zetilmedi\u011fini de\u011ferlendirmektedir (Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, B. No: 2012\/1184, 16\/7\/2014, \u00a7 27, 41, 52; Erg\u00fcn Poyraz (2) [GK], B. No: 2013\/8503, 27\/10\/2015 \u00a7 49; \u0130lhan Cihaner (2), \u00a7 49; Kemal K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7daro\u011flu \u00a7\u00a7 56-58).<\/p>\n
18. Mevcut ba\u015fvuruda da \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 ile ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri aras\u0131nda adil bir denge kurulmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu kapsamda ba\u015fvuru konusu ifadelerin ba\u011flam\u0131, konunun kamu yarar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir tart\u0131\u015fmaya katk\u0131 sunup sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, hedef al\u0131nan ve ifadeleri sarf eden ki\u015filerin kimlikleri ile derece mahkemelerince bu hususta ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e sunulup sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131d\u0131r (ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n dengelenmesinde dikkate al\u0131nacak kriterlere ili\u015fkin daha detayl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klama i\u00e7in bkz. Bilal U\u00e7ar, B. No: 2019\/10122, 21\/9\/2022, \u00a7 14).<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun sahibi oldu\u011fu kanalda yay\u0131mlanan haber program\u0131nda haberin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131’na ve CHP milletvekiline y\u00f6nelik ifadelerde bulunulmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu s\u00f6z konusu haber \u00f6ncesinde kamuda yo\u011fun bir \u015fekilde ba\u015fkanl\u0131k sistemine dair tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n Parti Meclisinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konu\u015fmalar\u0131n ter\u00f6r olaylar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ba\u015fkanl\u0131k sisteminin engellenmesi oldu\u011fu bi\u00e7iminde yorumland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ba\u011flamda CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n bir\u00e7ok konu\u015fmas\u0131 oldu\u011funu ve s\u00f6z konusu haberde de bu konu\u015fmalara de\u011finilerek a\u011f\u0131r ve sert ele\u015ftirilerde bulunuldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir. Di\u011fer yandan CHP milletvekiliyle ilgili s\u00f6zlerin de kendi a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ve tespitlerinin de\u011ferlendirilmesinden ibaret oldu\u011funu, bu kapsamda milletvekilinin ortaya att\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir iddian\u0131n ispatlanamamas\u0131 durumunda “\u015ferefsiz” oldu\u011funu ifade etmesi \u00fczerine ve bu ifadeye at\u0131fla ayn\u0131 kelimenin sarf edildi\u011fini belirten ba\u015fvurucu, haberde kullan\u0131lan s\u00f6zlerin belirli bir ba\u011flam\u0131 bulundu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. \u00d6ncelikle mevcut ba\u015fvuruya konu ifadelerin bir haber program\u0131nda kamunun g\u00fcndemindeki bir konuyla ilgili sarf edildi\u011fi g\u00f6zden uzak tutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r. S\u00f6z konusu programda CHP Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131n ba\u015fkanl\u0131k sistemine dair yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir k\u0131s\u0131m a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 ve akabinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi eylemleri \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131karan bir haber yay\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kapsamda toplumun tamam\u0131n\u0131 ilgilendiren ve kamusal bir tart\u0131\u015fmaya katk\u0131 sundu\u011fu konusunda \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmayan konularda olu\u015fan rahats\u0131zl\u0131klar\u0131n y\u00fcksek sesle dillendirilmesinin ancak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerin herhangi bir engelle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmadan a\u00e7\u0131klanabildi\u011fi demokratik rejimlerde m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu unutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Deniz Karadeniz ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/18001, 6\/2\/2020, \u00a7 129).<\/p>\n
21. Di\u011fer yandan Anayasa Mahkemesinin \u00f6nceki kararlar\u0131nda da istikrarl\u0131 \u015fekilde vurgulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere yaz\u0131l\u0131 ya da s\u00f6zl\u00fc bir beyan i\u00e7inde kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile ba\u011fda\u015f\u0131p ba\u011fda\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususuna karar verirken kullan\u0131lan ifadeleri ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopartmaks\u0131z\u0131n olay\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirmek gerekmektedir (Nilg\u00fcn Halloran, \u00a7 52; \u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, B. No: 2014\/6009, 15\/2\/2017, \u00a7 45). Tek ba\u015f\u0131na ve soyut olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda kaba ve k\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bulunabilecek bir s\u00f6z, ba\u011flam\u0131 ile birlikte ele al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda korunmas\u0131 gereken \u00fcslubun bir par\u00e7as\u0131 olarak nitelendirilebilir. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n somut olayda ba\u015fvurucuya verilen idari para cezas\u0131na konu ifadelerin ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopar\u0131larak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Nitekim somut olayda ilk derece mahkemesi -ba\u015fvurucunun ifadelerin ba\u011flam\u0131na y\u00f6nelik yukar\u0131da yer verilen iddialar\u0131n\u0131 da dikkate almaks\u0131z\u0131n- kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin ba\u011flam\u0131n\u0131, dile getirilme \u015fekli ve nedenini, ifadeyi kullanan ve ifadenin muhataplar\u0131n\u0131n konumlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc alan\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131, kullan\u0131lan ifadelerin arka plan\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n \u00f6nceki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeksizin ifadeleri ba\u011flam\u0131ndan kopararak tek ba\u015f\u0131na de\u011ferlendirmi\u015f, \u00fcstelik ifadelerin kullan\u0131m bi\u00e7imlerini de de\u011fi\u015ftirerek ele alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. Bu kapsamda yarg\u0131 mercileri, ba\u015fvurucunun bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve bu ba\u011flamda ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131n \u015feref ve itibar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda yukar\u0131da yer verildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle adil bir denge kurmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmam\u0131\u015f; programda ge\u00e7en belirli ifadeleri c\u0131mb\u0131zlayarak ve yaln\u0131zca soyut bir de\u011ferlendirmeyle s\u00f6z konusu ifadelerin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015f ve bu h\u00e2liyle Anayasa Mahkemesince ortaya konulan ilkelere g\u00f6re hareket etmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bireysel ba\u015fvuru incelemesinde bireylerin anayasal haklar\u0131 ihlal edilmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece derece mahkemelerinin dava konusu olgular\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesine ve hukuku yorumlamas\u0131na m\u00fcdahalede bulunmaz (\u00d6nder Bal\u0131k\u00e7\u0131, \u00a7 47; Haci Bo\u011fatekin (2), \u00a7 49). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olayda \u0130dare Mahkemesinin Anayasa Mahkemesinin an\u0131lan ilkeleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yapaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda ilgili ve yeterli gerek\u00e7e olu\u015fturmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ya da reddine karar vermesi elbette m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k yukar\u0131daki bilgiler dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yarg\u0131 mercilerinin ba\u015fvurucunun cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu toplumsal bir ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k geldi\u011fini ilgili ve yeterli bir gerek\u00e7eyle ortaya koydu\u011funun kabul edilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Nihayetinde ba\u015fvurucunun ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerine yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 26. ve 28. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlallerinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3), B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. \u0130fade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. ve 28. maddelerinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 14. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2017\/728, K.2017\/1926) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.287,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/18189 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 AK\u0130T TELEV\u0130ZYON VE RADYO A.\u015e. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/18189) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : \u015eeyda Nur \u00dcN Ba\u015fvurucu : Akit Televizyon ve Radyo A.\u015e. Vekili : Av. Ali Pacc\u0131 \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ba\u015fvurucunun sahibi oldu\u011fu televizyon kanal\u0131nda yay\u0131mlanan bir haberde ge\u00e7en ifadelerden dolay\u0131 idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade ve bas\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu olaylar\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi tarihte “Akit TV” logosuyla televizyon yay\u0131n\u0131 yapan medya hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bir kurulu\u015ftur. Radyo ve Televizyon \u00dcst Kurulu (RT\u00dcK) 11\/1\/2017 tarihinde; ba\u015fvurucuya ait televizyon kanal\u0131nda 21\/12\/2016 tarihinde saat 19.30’da yay\u0131mlanan “Ana Haber” b\u00fclteninde 15\/2\/2011 tarihli ve 6112 say\u0131l\u0131 Radyo ve Televizyonlar\u0131n Kurulu\u015f ve Yay\u0131n Hizmetleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 8. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendinde yer alan “\u0130nsan onuruna ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fine sayg\u0131l\u0131 olma ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olamaz, ki\u015fi ya da kurulu\u015flar\u0131 ele\u015ftiri s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 \u00f6tesinde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131lay\u0131c\u0131 veya iftira niteli\u011finde ifadeler i\u00e7eremez.” ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011finden bahisle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 32. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca 14.359 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n