T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MUHAMMET AS\u0130L BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/12094)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Muhammet AS\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan zarar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte ba\u015fvurucu, Jandarma Astsubay Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu \u00f6\u011frencisi olup birinci s\u0131n\u0131ftan ikinci s\u0131n\u0131fa ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. T\u00fcrkiye 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee bir darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Devletin yetkili organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tehdit de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131larak demokratik anayasal d\u00fczene, bireylerin temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerine, mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fe y\u00f6nelik tehdit olu\u015fturan t\u00fcm ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine ve illegal yap\u0131lanmalara kar\u015f\u0131 tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar i\u00e7in bkz. Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017).<\/p>\n
4. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 25\/7\/2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mezk\u00fbr KHK’n\u0131n 105. maddesinde asker\u00ee okullarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frencilerin durumlar\u0131na uygun okullara nakledilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u011fitim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc okul da an\u0131lan d\u00fczenleme kapsam\u0131nda kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, bu sebeple ba\u015fvurucunun okulla ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilerek ba\u015fka bir okula nakli sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Bunun \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sona ermesinden do\u011fan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini i\u00e7in idari yarg\u0131da dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ilgili h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6\u011freniminin devam ettirilip ettirilmemesi konusunda idareye herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirme yapma olana\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen zararlar\u0131n olu\u015fumunda idareye atf\u0131 kabil bir kusur bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu an\u0131lan karara kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. \u0130stinaf incelemesini yapan B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi ise ba\u015fvurucunun iddia etti\u011fi zarar\u0131n do\u011frudan KHK h\u00fckm\u00fcnden kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu zarar\u0131n idarece tesis edilmi\u015f bir i\u015flemden veya idarenin bir eyleminden kaynaklanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun incelenmeksizin reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu nihai karar\u0131 15\/3\/2019 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f, 10\/4\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn sona ermesinden do\u011fan zararlar\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle e\u011fitim ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. E\u011fitim hakk\u0131 en genel ifadeyle belli bir zamanda mevcut olan e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131na etkili bir bi\u00e7imde eri\u015fimin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131r (Mehmet Re\u015fit Arslan ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/583, 10\/12\/2014, \u00a7 68) Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda ba\u015fvurucu, her ne kadar e\u011fitim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f olsa da OHAL d\u00f6neminde s\u00f6z konusu okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 sebebiyle mevcut bir e\u011fitim kurumunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilemez. Bu sebeple asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 e\u011fitim hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale olarak de\u011ferlendirilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. \u00d6te yandan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu dava, B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesinin incelenmeksizin ret karar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u015fik\u00e2yetin \u00f6z\u00fc, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmemesine ili\u015fkindir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun t\u00fcm ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasan\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n yan\u0131nda bir kimsenin medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131yla ilgili yarg\u0131lamalarda da uygulan\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n medeni meselelerde uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in ortada hukuk d\u00fczeni taraf\u0131ndan ki\u015fiye tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f veya en az\u0131ndan savunulabilir temeli bulunan bir hakk\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekir. Bu hakk\u0131n Anayasa’da do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 olarak tan\u0131mlanan ve g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan bir hakka ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 zorunlu de\u011fildir. Bu bak\u0131mdan kanunla ki\u015filere tan\u0131nan ve savunulabilir bir temeli bulunan hak ve ayr\u0131cal\u0131klar da -mahkemelerde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilmesi ko\u015fuluyla- Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda hak kavram\u0131na d\u00e2hildir (baz\u0131 farklarla birlikte bkz. Mehmet G\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ve Ramazan Erdem, B. No: 2015\/7942, 28\/5\/2019, \u00a7 28; M.B., [GK], B. No: 2018\/37392, 23\/7\/2020, \u00a7 67).<\/p>\n
14. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta su\u00e7 isnad\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n niteli\u011fi itibar\u0131yla medeni hak ve y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp g\u00f6r\u00fclemeyece\u011fi, bu husustaki de\u011ferlendirmeden hareketle s\u00f6z konusu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme’nin ortak koruma alan\u0131 i\u00e7inde yer al\u0131p almad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir irdeleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130hsan Korkmaz karar\u0131nda (B. No: 2019\/15190, 2\/4\/2024) Deniz Harp Okulunda ara s\u0131n\u0131fta -\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc s\u0131n\u0131f- \u00f6\u011frenci iken 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK uyar\u0131nca harp akademilerinin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine asker\u00ee okuldan ba\u015fka bir okula nakledilen \u00f6\u011frencinin durumunu incelemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda darbe giri\u015fimi sonras\u0131nda asker\u00ee e\u011fitimin d\u00fczenlenmesinde, asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131nda ve ara s\u0131n\u0131ftaki \u00f6\u011frencilerin ba\u015fka okullara nakledilmesinde kamu hukukunun a\u011f\u0131r bast\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu sebeple asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131n\u0131n S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinin medeni y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fka bir ifadeyle an\u0131lan stat\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmas\u0131n\u0131n medeni bir hak olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ba\u015fvurunun konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir (\u0130hsan Korkmaz, \u00a7\u00a7 42-49).<\/p>\n
16. Nitekim Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi de (A\u0130HM) asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 ve \u00f6\u011frencilerin sivil e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131na nakledilmesine ili\u015fkin s\u00fcrecin konu edildi\u011fi Y\u0131ld\u0131z ve di\u011ferleri\/T\u00fcrkiye karar\u0131nda (B. No: 13510\/19, 17\/3\/2022) asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frenci stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc koruma hakk\u0131n\u0131n medeni karakterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle S\u00f6zle\u015fme’nin 6. maddesinin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvuruya ili\u015fkin S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesi ba\u011flam\u0131nda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemede, Pi\u015fkin\/T\u00fcrkiye karar\u0131na at\u0131fla, 6. maddenin ceza boyutunun uygulanamaz oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir (Y\u0131ld\u0131z ve di\u011ferleri\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 9) Kararda, asker\u00ee e\u011fitimi d\u00fczenleme ve profesyonel asker\u00ee hizmete giri\u015f ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 belirlemede kamu hukukunun a\u011f\u0131r bast\u0131\u011f\u0131, asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc devam ettirmenin S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinin medeni y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (Y\u0131ld\u0131z ve di\u011ferleri\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 11). Kararda ayr\u0131ca, asker\u00ee e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik mevzuata itiraz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvuranlar\u0131n sivil e\u011fitim kurumlar\u0131na nakline ili\u015fkin i\u015flemleri dava konusu etme haklar\u0131 oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Y\u0131ld\u0131z ve di\u011ferleri\/T\u00fcrkiye, \u00a7 13).<\/p>\n
17. \u00d6te yandan Anayasa Mahkemesi, 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 9\/11\/2016 tarihli ve 6756 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’la yasala\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan iptal davas\u0131nda, harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ve harp okullar\u0131, fak\u00fclte ve y\u00fcksek okullar ile astsubay meslek y\u00fcksek okullar\u0131nda (Jandarma d\u00e2hil) \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frenciler ile Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Kurulunca \u00fcniversite s\u0131nav\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihte ald\u0131klar\u0131 yerle\u015ftirme puanlar\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak durumlar\u0131na uygun fak\u00fclte ve y\u00fcksek okullara naklen kaydedilmelerine ili\u015fkin maddelerin Anayasa’ya uygunlu\u011fu denetlenmi\u015ftir. Kararda, 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcnden sonra TSK\u2019n\u0131n astsubay, subay ve kurmay subay ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131n asker\u00ee liseler, astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131 ve harp akademilerinden kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin sistemin de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f ve bu kapsamda asker\u00ee personel e\u011fitim sisteminin Mill\u00ee Savunma \u00dcniversitesi ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim seviyesinde yeniden yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, sistem de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin hi\u00e7bir \u00f6\u011frenci bak\u0131m\u0131ndan istisna te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fine, \u00f6\u011frenciler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden olu\u015fabilecek zararlar\u0131 olabildi\u011fince gidermeye y\u00f6nelik dengeleyici g\u00fcvencelerin sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yaparak iptal isteminin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2017\/18, K.2019\/66, 25\/7\/2019, \u00a7 60-84).<\/p>\n
18. Eldeki ba\u015fvuruda da asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak ara s\u0131n\u0131ftaki ba\u015fvurucunun okulla ili\u015fi\u011fi kesilmi\u015f ve ba\u015fka bir okula nakli sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvuru asker\u00ee \u00f6\u011frencilik stat\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn korunmamas\u0131ndan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda eldeki ba\u015fvurunun da S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin 6. maddesinin medeni y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u0130hsan Korkmaz karar\u0131ndan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir y\u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurunun konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 17\/9\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/9\/2024 tarihli ve 2019\/12094 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MUHAMMET AS\u0130L BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/12094) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/9\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : K\u00fcbra \u00c7\u0130FT\u00c7\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : Muhammet AS\u0130L \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; asker\u00ee okullar\u0131n kapat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan zarar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131 nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte ba\u015fvurucu, Jandarma Astsubay Meslek Y\u00fcksekokulu \u00f6\u011frencisi olup birinci s\u0131n\u0131ftan ikinci s\u0131n\u0131fa ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. 3. T\u00fcrkiye 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde asker\u00ee bir darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcyle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Devletin yetkili organlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan tehdit de\u011ferlendirmesi yap\u0131larak demokratik anayasal d\u00fczene, bireylerin temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerine, mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fe y\u00f6nelik tehdit olu\u015fturan t\u00fcm ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine ve illegal yap\u0131lanmalara kar\u015f\u0131 tedbirler al\u0131nmas\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar i\u00e7in bkz. Ayd\u0131n Yavuz ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2016\/22169, 20\/6\/2017). 4. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ya\u015fanan darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ard\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan 25\/7\/2016 tarihli ve 669 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n 104. maddesinde harp akademilerinin, asker\u00ee liselerin ve astsubay haz\u0131rlama okullar\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mezk\u00fbr KHK’n\u0131n 105. maddesinde asker\u00ee okullarda \u00f6\u011frenimine devam eden \u00f6\u011frencilerin durumlar\u0131na uygun okullara nakledilece\u011fi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 5. Ba\u015fvurucunun e\u011fitim g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc okul da an\u0131lan d\u00fczenleme kapsam\u0131nda …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20130","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n