T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00dcLK\u00dc KARTAL BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/39609)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 11\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024 – 32741<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa \u015eENOCAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u00dclk\u00fc KARTAL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, savunma i\u00e7in s\u00fcre talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Amasya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k)ba\u015fvurucunun Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 2\/7\/2019 tarihli iddianame ile ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n iddianamesinin Amasya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yarg\u0131lamaya ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece 21\/7\/2019 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda duru\u015fman\u0131n 15\/10\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc haz\u0131r edilmesine, tan\u0131klar H.Y. ve Z.Y.nin istinabe yoluyla dinlenilmesine, Bank Asyaya m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak para yat\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. 15\/10\/2019 tarihli birinci celsede tan\u0131k H.Y.nin bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan talimata bilaikmal cevap verilmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k Z.Y.nin bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan talimata ve Bank Asyaya yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkereye ikmalen cevap verilmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k Z.Y.nin beyan\u0131 ve Bank Asyaya yaz\u0131lan m\u00fczekkere cevab\u0131 duru\u015fmada okunmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin ara\u015ft\u0131rma taleplerini reddetmi\u015f; tan\u0131k H.Y.nin dinlenilmesinden vazge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. Yine ayn\u0131 celsede iddia makam\u0131 esas hakk\u0131nda m\u00fctalaa sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii, esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmak i\u00e7in s\u00fcre istedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaaya kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcre talebini \u015fu gerek\u00e7elerle reddetmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
“San\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fi, \u00e7ok say\u0131da tutuklulu\u011fa itiraz dilek\u00e7esi yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 iddialar ile ilgili savunmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyaya yeni gelen bir evrak\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fctalaadan da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde iddianame d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ekstra bir verinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin s\u00fcre talebinin reddine…”<\/p>\n
5. Mahkeme, duru\u015fmaya devamla ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi, Samsun B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesinin 2\/12\/2019 tarihli karar\u0131 ile esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu 17\/12\/2019 tarihli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra mahk\u00fbmiyetine esas al\u0131nan delilleri kendisine iletilmedi\u011finden delilleri inceleyemedi\u011fini, esasa y\u00f6nelik savunma yapabilmek i\u00e7in makul s\u00fcre talebinde bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen Mahkemece talebinin reddedildi\u011fini, b\u00f6ylece savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. (Kapat\u0131lan) Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesinin 13\/10\/2020 karar\u0131 ile h\u00fck\u00fcm onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 7\/12\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 9\/12\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Komisyon; adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131, silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkeleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan haklara ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu; iddia makam\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fctalaas\u0131n\u0131 vermesinden sonra savunmas\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlamak i\u00e7in talep etti\u011fi makul s\u00fcrenin Mahkemece verilmemesi neticesinde haz\u0131rl\u0131ks\u0131z olarak savunma yapmak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, b\u00f6ylece savunma hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ba\u015fvurucunun Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulundu\u011fu, su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmeyerek beraatini talep etti\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin de Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas hakk\u0131ndaki m\u00fctalaas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca esasa ili\u015fkin beyanda bulunmak \u00fczere s\u00fcre talep etti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin beyan\u0131nda genel olarak bireysel ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin ilkeleri Ufuk Rifat \u00c7obano\u011flu (B. No: 2014\/6971, 1\/2\/2017) karar\u0131nda belirlemi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki ki\u015fiye savunma i\u00e7in yeterli zaman\u0131n yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 adil olmaktan \u00e7\u0131karmayacak \u015fekilde tan\u0131nmas\u0131 yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz etkilememelidir. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle yarg\u0131lama, savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zamana sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyecek \u015fekilde aceleye getirilmemeli; an\u0131lan hakk\u0131n ger\u00e7ek anlamda kullan\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn k\u0131lacak bir s\u00fcratle sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bunlar\u0131n yan\u0131nda yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki esasl\u0131 i\u015flemlere kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcre verilmemesi, ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlay\u0131p mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcnde dile getirebilmesi ve b\u00f6ylece yarg\u0131lamalar\u0131n sonucunu etkileyebilmesi noktas\u0131nda iddia makam\u0131na nazaran dezavantajl\u0131 bir duruma d\u00fc\u015fmesine sebebiyet verebilir. Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan ve mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131 esasl\u0131 \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikteki yeni durumlarda su\u00e7 isnad\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki ki\u015fiye gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klar\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekir (Ufuk Rifat \u00c7obano\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 35-49, Bilal G\u00fcney, B. No: 2019\/24514, 21\/9\/2022, \u00a7 21).<\/p>\n
16. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun savunma i\u00e7in s\u00fcre talebi Mahkeme “san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin ba\u015f\u0131ndan beri dosyay\u0131 takip etti\u011fi, \u00e7ok say\u0131da tutuklulu\u011fa itiraz dilek\u00e7esi yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 iddialar ile ilgili savunmalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyaya yeni gelen bir evrak\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fctalaadan da ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde iddianame d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ekstra bir verinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan tutuklu olarak yarg\u0131lanan ba\u015fvurucunun Bylock Tespit De\u011ferlendirme Tutana\u011f\u0131’na eri\u015femedi\u011fi, 15\/10\/2019 tarihli birinci celsede taraf\u0131na okunan belgelere (bkz. \u00a7 4) ili\u015fkin beyan\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda savunmas\u0131n\u0131 planlay\u0131p yapabilme imk\u00e2n\u0131ndan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan iddianamenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi 2\/7\/2019 tarihinden ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin savunma yapmak i\u00e7in s\u00fcre talebinde bulundu\u011fu 15\/10\/2019 tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre 3 ay 13 g\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu talebin makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 uzataca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6ylenemez. Yarg\u0131lama bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde -somut olay\u0131n \u00f6zel ko\u015fullar\u0131nda- ba\u015fvurucunun savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu, silahlar\u0131n e\u015fitli\u011fi ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeli yarg\u0131lama ilkelerinin de ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yeti y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun bu iddias\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131ca incelenmesine gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ve ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekenlerin yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
21. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, reddine ya da beraate veya mahk\u00fbmiyete karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131lama sonunda da delillerin dava ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili mahkemelere aittir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n \u0130NCELENMES\u0130NE GEREK OLMADI\u011eINA,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Amasya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2019\/343, K.2019\/211) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 11\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 11\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/39609 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00dcLK\u00dc KARTAL BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/39609) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 11\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024 – 32741 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN \u00a0 \u00a0 Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa \u015eENOCAK Ba\u015fvurucu : \u00dclk\u00fc KARTAL \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, savunma i\u00e7in s\u00fcre talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle savunma i\u00e7in gerekli zaman ve kolayl\u0131klara sahip olma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Amasya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k)ba\u015fvurucunun Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 2\/7\/2019 tarihli iddianame ile ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olma su\u00e7undan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n iddianamesinin Amasya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) kabul\u00fc ile ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda yarg\u0131lamaya ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkemece 21\/7\/2019 tarihinde duru\u015fma haz\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flemleri yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Tensip Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda duru\u015fman\u0131n 15\/10\/2019 tarihinde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, ba\u015fvurucunun duru\u015fma g\u00fcn\u00fc haz\u0131r edilmesine, tan\u0131klar H.Y. ve Z.Y.nin istinabe yoluyla dinlenilmesine, Bank Asyaya m\u00fczekkere yaz\u0131larak para yat\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 4. 15\/10\/2019 tarihli birinci celsede tan\u0131k H.Y.nin bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan talimata bilaikmal cevap verilmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131k Z.Y.nin bilgi ve g\u00f6rg\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn tespiti i\u00e7in yaz\u0131lan …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18874","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n