T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130LHAN KOYU BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23716)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6rler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Murat \u0130lter DEVEC\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u0130lhan KOYU<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Metin \u0130R\u0130Z<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; haks\u0131z yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma i\u015flemlerinden do\u011fan manevi zarar\u0131n tazmini istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada yeterli tazminata h\u00fckmedilmemesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve tazminat miktar\u0131 belirlenirken toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011finin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle de toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 <\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 11\/5\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR <\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formuyla eklerine ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla temin edilen belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcnden sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvuruya konu olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonuna (KESK) ba\u011fl\u0131 bir sendikan\u0131n kamuoyunca bilinen y\u00f6neticisidir.<\/p>\n
6. Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y \u0130l\u00e7e Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn talebi \u00fczerine Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Kaymakam\u0131 1\/6\/2018 tarihinde, kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi ile esenli\u011finin korunmas\u0131 ve 24\/6\/2018 tarihinde yap\u0131lacak Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve milletvekili se\u00e7imine ili\u015fkin propaganda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n sorunsuz bir \u015fekilde s\u00fcrmesi i\u00e7in KESK \u00fcyelerinin Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet (\u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck) Meydan\u0131 ve \u00e7evresinde bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 yapmas\u0131n\u0131 ve otuma eylemi gibi eylemlerde bulunmas\u0131n\u0131 yasaklam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. S\u00f6z\u00fc edilen yasaklama karar\u0131n\u0131 10\/6\/1949 tarihli ve 5442 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130l \u0130daresi Kanunu\u2019nun 32. maddesinin (\u00c7) f\u0131kras\u0131na dayand\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karardan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n
– KESK \u00fcyeleri, altm\u0131\u015f yedi haftad\u0131r haftan\u0131n belirli g\u00fcnlerinde, kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan sendika \u00fcyelerinin yeniden kamu g\u00f6revine al\u0131nmas\u0131 talebiyle meydanda \u00fc\u00e7 saat s\u00fcren eylemler yapmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
– S\u00f6z\u00fc edilen meydan yayalar\u0131n yo\u011fun olarak kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir yerdir. Devam eden tren hatt\u0131 yap\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle \u00e7evredeki yaya \u00fcst ge\u00e7idi iptal edildi\u011fi i\u00e7in ge\u00e7ici olarak hayata ge\u00e7irilen yeni yaya \u00fcst ge\u00e7idi, dar olan meydan\u0131 yo\u011funla\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Se\u00e7im \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 nedeniyle siyasi partiler meydanda stant a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca meydanda yerel y\u00f6netime ait iftar \u00e7ad\u0131r\u0131 ile iftarl\u0131k malzeme ta\u015f\u0131yan kamyonet bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
– KESK \u00fcyeleri, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan eylemleriyle ilgili olarak herhangi bir m\u00fcracaatta bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
– Siyasi partiler propaganda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda hoparl\u00f6r kullanmazken KESK \u00fcyeleri, hoparl\u00f6r kullanarak sloganlar atmakta ve bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda baz\u0131 siyasi partileri hedef alacak \u015fekilde propaganda yapmaktad\u0131r. Olduk\u00e7a dar olan meydanda siyasi partilere ait stantlar da bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in telafisi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmayan olaylar\u0131n meydana gelmesi kuvvetle muhtemeldir.<\/p>\n
7. KESK \u00fcyelerinden\/eski \u00fcyelerinden olu\u015fan yakla\u015f\u0131k yirmi be\u015f ki\u015filik bir grup, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve oturma eylemi yapmak \u00fczere 2\/6\/2018 tarihinde saat 13.35 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Cumhuriyet Meydan\u0131\u2019nda toplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Grupta ba\u015fvurucu da bulunmaktad\u0131r. Konuyla ilgili polis tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re;<\/p>\n
i. Yasaklama karar\u0131ndan haberdar edilen bir grup \u00fcyesi, polise eylemlerini mutlaka yapacaklar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir. Ard\u0131ndan grup, \u00fczerinde \u201c\u0130\u015fimizi ekme\u011fimizi geri alaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d yazan bir pankart\u0131 yere sermi\u015f; sendika isminin yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu yeleklerini giymi\u015f ve hep bir a\u011f\u0131zdan \u201cG\u00fcn gelecek devran d\u00f6necek, AKP halka hesap verecek\u201d, \u201cDirene direne kazanaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d, \u201cAKP\u2019nin memuru olmayaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d ve \u201cAKP gidecek biz kalaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d \u015feklinde sloganlar atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. Saat 13.40 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda polis; ses y\u00fckseltici cihaz kullanarak toplant\u0131n\u0131n kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, aksi h\u00e2lde artan nispette g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131larak toplant\u0131n\u0131n da\u011f\u0131t\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gruba bildirmi\u015ftir. Bu bildirim belirli aral\u0131klarla \u00fc\u00e7 kez yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te baz\u0131 grup \u00fcyeleri da\u011f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu on be\u015f ki\u015fi, da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar ederek yere oturmu\u015f; kol kola girerek birbirlerine kenetlenmi\u015f ve slogan atmaya devam etmi\u015ftir. 14.05 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda polis, artan oranda g\u00fc\u00e7 kullanarak da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar eden ki\u015fileri yakalay\u0131p g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nanlar\u0131n bindirildi\u011fi araca alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
iii. Saat 14.28 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda telefonla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclen n\u00f6bet\u00e7i Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar etme su\u00e7u nedeniyle \u015f\u00fcphelilerin ifadelerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 ve soru\u015fturma evrak\u0131n\u0131n ikmal edilerek g\u00f6nderilmesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde polise talimat vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Yakalanan ki\u015filere destek i\u00e7in saat 15.30 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda toplanan yakla\u015f\u0131k k\u0131rk ki\u015filik gruptan on d\u00f6rt ki\u015fi saat 16.55 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda yakalanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 bu ki\u015filer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de polise ayn\u0131 talimat\u0131 vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Polis 6\/10\/1983 tarihli ve 2911 say\u0131l\u0131 Toplant\u0131 ve G\u00f6steri Y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri Kanunu\u2019nun 32. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen direnme su\u00e7u nedeniyle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda saat 17.27\u2019de ba\u015fvurucunun ifadesini almak istemi\u015f ancak ba\u015fvurucu susma hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Soru\u015fturma evrak\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda adli rapor al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lsa da ba\u015fvurucunun ne zaman serbest b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcpheliler hakk\u0131nda direnme su\u00e7unu i\u015fledikleri iddias\u0131yla kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede; \u015f\u00fcphelilerin yasaklama karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen meydanda toplan\u0131p slogan att\u0131klar\u0131, kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin ihtarlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen yere oturduklar\u0131, kol kola girip kenetlenerek slogan atmaya devam ettikleri ve kendilerine kar\u015f\u0131 g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar ettikleri ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 yapan Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y 33. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi, san\u0131klara isnat edilen su\u00e7un olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle san\u0131klar\u0131n beraatine karar vermi\u015ftir. Karara g\u00f6re iddianamede su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden bir eyleme yer verilmemi\u015f, toplant\u0131n\u0131n kamu d\u00fczenini bozdu\u011fu da iddia edilmemi\u015ftir. Yasaklama karar\u0131 ilgili Sendikaya bildirilmemi\u015f ve polisin asayi\u015fi bozucu nitelikteki m\u00fcdahalesine kadar herhangi bir sorun ya\u015fanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri i\u00e7in ilgili kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen bildirimin yap\u0131lmamas\u0131, toplant\u0131y\u0131 kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 h\u00e2le getirse bile bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale i\u00e7in gerek\u00e7e olu\u015fturamaz. Ayr\u0131ca 30\/3\/2005 tarihli ve 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu\u2019nun emre ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen 32. maddesinin \u015fartlar\u0131 da mevcut de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
10. Aleyhine kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in an\u0131lan karar, ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 2\/12\/2019 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu\u2019nun 141. vd. maddelerine dayanarak \u0130stanbul 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Ceza Mahkemesi) tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Manevi tazminat olarak 5.000 TL talep eden ba\u015fvurucu, dava dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle \u015fu iddialarda bulunmu\u015ftur:<\/p>\n
– Kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f baz\u0131 sendika \u00fcyelerine y\u00f6nelik etkinlik kapsam\u0131nda, ifade ve \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri ile toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada yakalanarak g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve bir sonraki g\u00fcn, gecenin ilerleyen saatlerinde serbest b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi planlanan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131, kolluk m\u00fcdahalesi nedeniyle yap\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar etme su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla yarg\u0131lanm\u0131\u015f ve beraat etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
-Yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemleri nedeniyle ma\u011fdur edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
– Ki\u015finin haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde yakalanarak \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131 zedeleyen a\u011f\u0131r bir ihlaldir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fckmedilecek manevi tazminat, di\u011fer tazminat sebepleriyle h\u00fckmedilene k\u0131yasla daha fazla olmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. Ceza Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda ba\u015fvurucu lehine 150 TL manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u201c…<\/p>\n
…[D]avac\u0131n\u0131n bir g\u00fcn s\u00fcre g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bilahare serbest b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucu beraat etti\u011fi, beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n bilahare kesinle\u015fti\u011fi ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, davac\u0131n\u0131n sosyal, ekonomik ve k\u00fclt\u00fcrel durumu, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda ve tutuklulukta kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre hak ve nesafet kurallar\u0131 nazara al\u0131narak takdiren davac\u0131n\u0131n talebinin k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile 150,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f[tir]…\u201d<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, an\u0131lan karar aleyhine istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Bu ba\u015fvuruda dile getirdi\u011fi iddialara g\u00f6re kamunun kusuru ile g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131n\u0131p hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lama neticesinde beraat etmesi nedeniyle belirlenen manevi tazminat miktar\u0131 yetersizdir. Ayr\u0131ca devletin m\u00fcsamahas\u0131 alt\u0131nda olan bir olguya temas etseydi lehine h\u00fckmedilen tazminat daha y\u00fcksek olabilirdi.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf ba\u015fvurusu \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Ceza Dairesince (Ceza Dairesi) esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir. Buna ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 ba\u015fvurucu vekili, 30\/4\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f; ba\u015fvuru 11\/5\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 18\/7\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Ki\u015fi H\u00fcrriyeti ve G\u00fcvenli\u011fi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 <\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, haks\u0131z yere yakalan\u0131p g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve Ceza Mahkemesince h\u00fckmedilen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz oldu\u011funu iddia ederek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucuya g\u00f6re hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturmada polis kendisini ifade vermeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rabilirdi. Ayr\u0131ca tazminat miktar\u0131 belirlenirken yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 i\u015flemlerine anayasal haklar\u0131n kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu,kendisine isnat edilen su\u00e7 nedeniyle yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada beraat etti\u011fi ve hem \u00f6\u011fretmen hem sendika y\u00f6neticisi oldu\u011fu dikkate al\u0131nmal\u0131 idi.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesi G\u00fclseren \u00c7\u0131tak ([GK], B. No: 2020\/1554, 27\/4\/2023) karar\u0131yla i\u00e7tihat de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine gitmi\u015f, haklar\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya beraat karar\u0131 verilenlerin 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat yolunu t\u00fckettikten sonra yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veyatutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6denen tazminat\u0131n yetersiz oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla yapt\u0131klar\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvurularda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmi\u015f kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in yaln\u0131zca 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e) bendi kapsam\u0131nda bir tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Zira bu h\u00fck\u00fcmle yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklaman\u0131n daha sonra verilen kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya beraat karar\u0131ylahukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 h\u00e2le geldi\u011finin kabul edildi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (e) bendi uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davalar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede bu bent kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k kanun gere\u011fince kabul edildi\u011finden a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesince bu bende dayan\u0131larak tazminat \u00f6denmesi durumunda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lacak inceleme tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirlemekle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r (an\u0131lan kararda bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 36-39).<\/p>\n
18. Somut olayda Ceza Mahkemesi, hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131lama sonunda beraatkarar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu lehine bir miktar manevi tazminata h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda ihlal iddias\u0131 Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ayn\u0131 maddenin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
20. Haks\u0131z g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutma nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131 inceleyen yarg\u0131 mercileri, s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen koruma tedbirlerinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru\u015fturmalar\u0131n kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair kararla veya davac\u0131lar hakk\u0131ndaki kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131n beraat karar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederse Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131na uygun olarak, u\u011fran\u0131lan zararlar\u0131n devlet taraf\u0131ndan tazminat hukukunun genel prensiplerine g\u00f6re \u00f6denmesine karar vermelidir. H\u00fckmedilen tazminat ihlalle orant\u0131l\u0131 olmayacak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde \u00f6nemsizse ya da Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer ihlaller nedeniyle h\u00fckmetti\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re kayda de\u011fer \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde d\u00fc\u015f\u00fckse Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 ihlal edilmi\u015f olur. Bununla birlikte tazminat miktar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer ihlaller nedeniyle h\u00fckmetti\u011fi tazminattan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck olmas\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etmez zira tazminat\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131yla uyumlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r (M.E., B. No: 2018\/696, 9\/5\/2019, \u00a7 48).<\/p>\n
21. \u0130lk derece mahkemesince h\u00fckmedilen manevi tazminat\u0131n yeterlili\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmada nazara al\u0131nacak tazminat miktar\u0131, ilk derece mahkemesinin karar verdi\u011fi tarihte Anayasa Mahkemesince benzer ba\u015fvurularda \u00f6denmesine karar verilen veya verilmesi gereken miktard\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilirken ki\u015finin sosyal ve ekonomik durumu, mesleki ve toplumsal konumu, \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7un niteli\u011fi, koruma tedbirine neden olan olay\u0131n cereyan tarz\u0131, tedbirin ki\u015finin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 olumsuz etkiler ve tedbirin s\u00fcresi, tedbir nedeniyle meydana gelen ihlalin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nmaktad\u0131r (Siyami H\u0131d\u0131ro\u011flu [GK], B. No: 2018\/11489, 11\/1\/2024, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
22. Ceza Mahkemesince \u00f6denmesine karar verilen 150 TL manevi tazminat, somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda ve manevi tazminat\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin yukar\u0131da belirtilen kriterler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; -tazminata karar veren ilk derece mahkemesinin karar tarihi itibar\u0131yla- Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer durumlarda \u00f6denmesine karar verdi\u011fi veya verebilece\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re olduk\u00e7a d\u00fc\u015f\u00fckt\u00fcr (Anayasa Mahkemesinin g\u00f6zalt\u0131n\u0131n hukukili\u011fi ile ilgili iddialarda bir g\u00fcnl\u00fck g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7in \u00f6denmesine karar verdi\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131 ilk derece mahkemesinin karar tarihi olan 2020 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in asgari 600 TL, 2024 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7in ise 2.970 TL\u2019dir.). Ceza Mahkemesince h\u00fckmedilen tazminat\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesinin benzer durumlarda verilmesine h\u00fckmetti\u011fi tazminat miktar\u0131yla ayn\u0131 olmas\u0131 gerekmemekle birlikte somut olay\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131nda \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmedilen miktar\u0131n tazminat hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc zay\u0131flatacak kadar d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
23. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ayn\u0131 maddenindokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Toplant\u0131 ve G\u00f6steri Y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc D\u00fczenleme Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
1-\u00a0 Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
24. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131l bir etkinli\u011fe kat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle hakk\u0131nda yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma i\u015flemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesinin toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011finden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvuru, toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
26. Somut olayda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanun taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmi\u015fg\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbiri nedeniyle ba\u015fvurucu lehine Ceza Mahkemesince manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut olay\u0131n \u015fartlar\u0131nda \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmedilen miktar\u0131n tazminat hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc zay\u0131flatacak kadar d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu durumda haks\u0131z koruma tedbiri nedeniyle a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda tazminat miktar\u0131 belirlenirken ba\u015fvurucunun toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenlenme hakk\u0131na da m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011finin g\u00f6zetilip g\u00f6zetilemeyece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
27. Anayasa Mahkemesinin olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Yal\u00e7\u0131n D\u00fczg\u00fcn ([GK], B. No: 2021\/23140, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7\u00a7 23,24) karar\u0131nda; koruma tedbirleri sonucu ki\u015fisel hakk\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan manevi tazminat davas\u0131nda, koruma tedbirinin ki\u015finin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131 olumsuz etkiler ile hak ihlali ve\/veya ihlallerin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131nceza mahkemesince dikkate al\u0131nabilece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi; beraat karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 141. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan tazminat davas\u0131nda yarg\u0131 merciince, uygulanan koruma tedbirinin toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahale niteli\u011finde olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmemesinin ve takdir edilecek tazminat miktar\u0131nda bu durumun g\u00f6zetilmemesinin toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Somut olayda da Yal\u00e7\u0131n D\u00fczg\u00fcn (ayn\u0131 kararda bkz. \u00a7 23, 24) karar\u0131ndaki de\u011ferlendirme ve kabulden ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
28. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 34. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
V. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
29. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespitini, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 ve herhangi bir miktar belirtmeden lehine manevi tazminata karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanunla tespit edilmi\u015f g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbiri nedeniyle h\u00fckmedilen manevi tazminat\u0131n yetersiz olmas\u0131 nedeniyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ayn\u0131 maddenin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ile toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 merciince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yenidenyarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
31. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A. 1. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. 1. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ayn\u0131 maddenin dokuzuncu f\u0131kras\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
2. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 34. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 ile toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin ihlallerin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere \u0130stanbul 5. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2020\/70, K.2020\/267) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 18.800 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 19.287,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 19. Ceza Dairesine (E.2020\/4358, K.2021\/1130) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 18\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/23716 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u0130LHAN KOYU BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/23716) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/7\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6rler : Murat \u0130lter DEVEC\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : \u0130lhan KOYU Vekili : Av. Metin \u0130R\u0130Z \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru; haks\u0131z yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma i\u015flemlerinden do\u011fan manevi zarar\u0131n tazmini istemiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada yeterli tazminata h\u00fckmedilmemesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve tazminat miktar\u0131 belirlenirken toplant\u0131 hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011finin dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131 nedeniyle de toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 11\/5\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formuyla eklerine ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla temin edilen belgelere g\u00f6re ilgili olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. 15 Temmuz 2016 tarihinde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcnden sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucu, iddias\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvuruya konu olay\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi tarihte Kamu Emek\u00e7ileri Sendikalar\u0131 Konfederasyonuna (KESK) ba\u011fl\u0131 bir sendikan\u0131n kamuoyunca bilinen y\u00f6neticisidir. 6. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n