T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
HAVLE HACAL\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/27868)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 5\/6\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eahap KAYMAK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Havle HACAL\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle yabanc\u0131 uyruklunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu 1977 do\u011fumlu olup Suriye Arap Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya 3\/8\/2018 tarihinde Gaziantep \u0130l G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ici koruma kimlik belgesi verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, Gaziantep 7. Aile Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) mutlak butlan sebebiyle evlili\u011fin iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu, Suriye uyruklu ve T\u00fcrkiye’de ikamet izni olan e\u015finin ikinci han\u0131m\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f; mutlak butlan ile bat\u0131l olan evlili\u011fin iptalini talep etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden muaf tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyerek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat etmek i\u00e7in dava dilek\u00e7esi ekinde ge\u00e7ici koruma kimlik belgesini sunmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme 16\/3\/2020 tarihli tensip ara karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun vatanda\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu Suriye ile T\u00fcrkiye aras\u0131nda imzalanan adli yard\u0131m anla\u015fmas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebini reddetmi\u015f; ba\u015fvurucuya ba\u015fvuru ve pe\u015fin harc\u0131 iki haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde yat\u0131rmas\u0131n\u0131, aksi takdirde davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ihtar etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucu 29\/6\/2020 tarihinde karara itiraz etmi\u015ftir. \u0130tiraz dilek\u00e7esinde 28\/7\/1951 tarihli Birle\u015fmi\u015f Milletler M\u00fcltecilerin Hukuki Stat\u00fcs\u00fcne \u0130li\u015fkin S\u00f6zle\u015fme’nin (Cenevre S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi) 7. ve 16. maddeleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n aranmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, sigortal\u0131 bir i\u015fte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve \u00fczerine kay\u0131tl\u0131 ara\u00e7 ile ta\u015f\u0131nmaz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dava har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131layacak durumu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130tiraz\u0131 inceleyen Gaziantep 8. Aile Mahkemesi 1\/7\/2020 tarihli karar\u0131yla itiraz\u0131 kesin olarak reddetmi\u015f, Gerek\u00e7ede 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 334. maddesinde yer alan m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131 somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden Gaziantep 7. Aile Mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin yerinde oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Mahkeme 6\/11\/2020 tarihli ara karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun verilen kesin s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde harc\u0131 yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan 31\/7\/2020 tarihinden itibaren dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, akabinde ayn\u0131 tarihli karar\u0131yla dosyan\u0131n i\u015flemden kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay i\u00e7inde yenileme dilek\u00e7esi verilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle 3\/11\/2020 tarihi itibar\u0131yla davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddedilmesine dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin h\u00fckm\u00fc 16\/7\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 13\/8\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Adli Yard\u0131m Talebi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuru har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lama imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6deme g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunan yabanc\u0131 bir ki\u015finin adli yard\u0131m talepli olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvurusu ile ilgili olarak s\u00f6z konusu ba\u015fvurucunun tabiiyetinde oldu\u011fu \u00fclke ile T\u00fcrkiye aras\u0131ndaki m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir de\u011ferlendirme yapm\u0131\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebini kabul etmi\u015ftir (Nadali Aghel\u0131 Kohne Shahr\u0131, B. No: 2014\/12633, 9\/9\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 16-20). Bu kapsamda ge\u00e7imini \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde g\u00fc\u00e7le\u015ftirmeksizin yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmayan adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Mahkemeye Eri\u015fim Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle adalete eri\u015fiminin engellendi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f; adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ve e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvuru, mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. \u00d6ncelikle ba\u015fvurucunun ara karar\u0131 niteli\u011finde olan adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddedilmesine dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin karara y\u00f6nelik ba\u015fvurusunun 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen kabul edilebilirlik \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi s\u00f6z konusu de\u011ferlendirmeyi, somut ba\u015fvuruya benzer nitelikteki Tacettin Ceylan ([GK], B. No: 2017\/39062, 10\/11\/2021) karar\u0131nda yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan kararda, esas\u0131 devam eden yarg\u0131lamada adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddine ili\u015fkin karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun salt adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilece\u011fini belirterek ba\u015fvuruyu kabul edilebilir bulmu\u015ftur. Somut ba\u015fvuruda da bu karardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir neden yoktur.<\/p>\n
17. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa Mahkemesi, somut ba\u015fvuru ile ayn\u0131 nitelikteki ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131 inceledi\u011fi Mohamma Salem Pashto ve Naz\u0131 Salem ([GK], B. No: 2019\/26339, 17\/5\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda Anayasa Mahkemesi, Anayasa’n\u0131n 16. maddesi uyar\u0131nca yabanc\u0131lar i\u00e7in T\u00fcrk vatanda\u015flar\u0131ndan farkl\u0131 olarak getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n milletleraras\u0131 hukuka uygun olmas\u0131 yan\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca kanunla yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade ederek kanunda kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k \u015fart\u0131 arand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Ancak m\u00fcdahaleye dayanak olu\u015fturan 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 334. maddesinin (3) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015filerin \u00f6zel durumlar\u0131n\u0131 (stat\u00fc, \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc vs.) dikkate almadan kategorik bir yakla\u015f\u0131mla yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n adli yard\u0131mdan yararlanmalar\u0131na s\u0131n\u0131rlama getirdi\u011fini, s\u00f6z konusu yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131 itibar\u0131yla \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fc bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a anla\u015f\u0131lan yabanc\u0131 ki\u015filerin s\u0131rf kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131l\u0131k \u015fart\u0131 yerine getirilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle dava a\u00e7ma hakk\u0131ndan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmalar\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Mohamma Salem Pashto ve Naz\u0131 Salem, \u00a7\u00a7 74,75).<\/p>\n
19. Kararda ayr\u0131ca m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n kategorik olarak uygulanmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu getirilmek suretiyle h\u00e2kime, dava a\u00e7mak isteyen yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n her somut olay \u00f6zelinde ekonomik ve sosyal durumlar\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alarak ger\u00e7ekten \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun olup olmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesi konusunda herhangi bir takdir yetkisi tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na i\u015faret edilmi\u015ftir. Bu durumun herhangi bir geliri bulunmayan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u00fclke \u015fartlar\u0131na g\u00f6re olduk\u00e7a y\u00fcksek olan mahkeme har\u00e7 ve masraflar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demek zorunda b\u0131rak\u0131lmalar\u0131na, devam eden yarg\u0131lamada gider avans\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan miktarlardaki masraflar\u0131 \u00f6deme zorlu\u011fuyla kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalmalar\u0131na yol a\u00e7arak tazminat taleplerini yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde dava konusu yapma ya da devam eden davay\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrme imk\u00e2nlar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na veya bunun ciddi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde zorla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na neden oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir (Mohamma Salem Pashto ve Naz\u0131 Salem, \u00a7 78).<\/p>\n
20. Bu itibarla m\u00fcdahaleye esas te\u015fkil eden kanunun lafz\u0131nda ge\u00e7en m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n mutlak kural olarak uygulanmak suretiyle dava a\u00e7an yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n durumlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesine f\u0131rsat vermeden adli yard\u0131mdan yararland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131n\u0131 engellemesinin kanunun bizatihi kendisinden kaynaklanan ve anayasal g\u00fcvencelerle \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan bir uygulamaya yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Mohamma Salem Pashto ve Naz\u0131 Salem, \u00a7 79).<\/p>\n
21. Somut ba\u015fvuruda da an\u0131lan karardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir bir husus bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespiti ile 5.000 TL maddi ve 5.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
24. Anayasa Mahkemesi ihlalin kanundan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2llerde giderimin ne \u015fekilde yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili olarak Hulusi Y\u0131lmaz ([GK], B. No: 2017\/17428, 1\/12\/2022) karar\u0131nda ilkeleri tespit etmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re ihlal, idari makamlar\u0131n veya yarg\u0131 mercilerinin Anayasa’ya uygun yorum yapmalar\u0131na imk\u00e2n vermeyecek a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kta bir kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc uygulamalar\u0131 veya kanundaki belirsizlikler sebebiyle ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015fsa bu ihlal, kanunun uygulanmas\u0131ndan de\u011fil do\u011frudan kanundan kaynaklanmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda ancak ihlale yol a\u00e7an kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 veya ilgili h\u00fckm\u00fcn yeni ihlallere yol a\u00e7\u0131lmayacak bir \u015fekilde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ya da yeni ihlallere yol a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilmesi i\u00e7in belirsizli\u011fin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde s\u00f6z konusu ihlalin b\u00fct\u00fcn sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla giderilebildi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilebilir.<\/p>\n
25. Anayasa Mahkemesinin Hulusi Y\u0131lmaz karar\u0131nda benimsendi\u011fi \u00fczere kanundan kaynaklanan ihlal durumunda ihlalin giderimini sa\u011flayabilecek y\u00f6ntemlerden biri de ihlale neden kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle ilgili mahkemesince itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ba\u011flamda somut ba\u015fvuruda Anayasa’n\u0131n 152. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ilgili kanun h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn iptali i\u00e7in Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulundu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Mohamma Salem Pashto ve Naz\u0131 Salem, \u00a7\u00a7 85, 86).<\/p>\n
26. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi ve manevi tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Gaziantep 7. Aile Mahkemesine (E.2020\/180, K.2020\/490) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 5\/6\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 5\/6\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/27868 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 HAVLE HACAL\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/27868) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 5\/6\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : \u015eahap KAYMAK Ba\u015fvurucu : Havle HACAL\u0130 \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, m\u00fctekabiliyet \u015fart\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle yabanc\u0131 uyruklunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu 1977 do\u011fumlu olup Suriye Arap Cumhuriyeti vatanda\u015f\u0131d\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucuya 3\/8\/2018 tarihinde Gaziantep \u0130l G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ici koruma kimlik belgesi verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, Gaziantep 7. Aile Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) mutlak butlan sebebiyle evlili\u011fin iptali davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde ba\u015fvurucu, Suriye uyruklu ve T\u00fcrkiye’de ikamet izni olan e\u015finin ikinci han\u0131m\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f; mutlak butlan ile bat\u0131l olan evlili\u011fin iptalini talep etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden muaf tutulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyerek adli yard\u0131m talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcn\u00fcn bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ispat etmek i\u00e7in dava dilek\u00e7esi ekinde ge\u00e7ici koruma kimlik belgesini sunmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme 16\/3\/2020 tarihli tensip ara karar\u0131nda, ba\u015fvurucunun vatanda\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu Suriye ile T\u00fcrkiye aras\u0131nda imzalanan adli yard\u0131m anla\u015fmas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adli yard\u0131m talebini reddetmi\u015f; ba\u015fvurucuya ba\u015fvuru ve pe\u015fin harc\u0131 iki haftal\u0131k kesin s\u00fcre …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-16574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n