Adli tatilin \u00fclkemize, yarg\u0131m\u0131za, hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131m\u0131za hay\u0131rl\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131 diliyoruz.<\/p>\n
\u00d6zet olarak bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma; adli y\u0131l\u0131n merak edilen en \u00f6nemli konular\u0131ndan birisinin de bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde itiraz, istinaf ve temyiz gibi kanun yolu s\u00fcrelerinin durup durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ne \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi gerekti\u011fi hakk\u0131ndad\u0131r. Adil tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde ilk derece mahkemesince verilen bir karar\u0131n istinaf edilmesi veya b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince verilen bir karar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi ya da itiraza tabi bir karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle adli tatil, kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde, ister adli tatilde bak\u0131labilen bir i\u015f olsun veya olmas\u0131n, herhangi bir engel olu\u015fturmaz. Yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru kayda al\u0131n\u0131p kanun yolu inceleme merciine g\u00f6nderilir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan adli tatilin bir \u00f6nemi yoktur. Hatta adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan tebligat da ge\u00e7erlidir.[1] Adil tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u00f6nem arz eden husus, s\u00fcrelerin i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fidir. Bu ba\u015fl\u0131kta ceza muhakemesinde adli tatile denk gelen s\u00fcreler i\u015fler mi? Bu y\u00f6ndeki talepler adli tatil sonras\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131labilir mi? B\u00f6yle bir durumda ne yapmak gerekir? Yasa ve uygulama ne y\u00f6ndedir? \u015feklindeki sorular\u0131 ele alaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331. maddesinde adli tatile ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, ceza i\u015flerini g\u00f6ren makam ve mahkemeler her y\u0131l bir eyl\u00fclde ba\u015flamak \u00fczere, yirmi temmuzdan (dahil) otuz bir a\u011fustosa (dahil) kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ara verirler. Soru\u015fturma ile tutuklu i\u015flere ili\u015fkin kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131n ve ivedi say\u0131lacak di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde ne suretle yerine getirilece\u011fi, H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kurulunca belirlenir. Tatil s\u00fcresince b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri ile Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z tutuklu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ili\u015fkin veya Me\u015fhud Su\u00e7lar\u0131n Muhakeme Usul\u00fc Kanunu gere\u011fince g\u00f6r\u00fclen i\u015flerin incelemelerini yapar. Adl\u00ee tatile rastlayan s\u00fcreler i\u015flemez. Bu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.[2]<\/p>\n
Burada dikkat edilmesi gereken en \u00f6nemli husus, s\u00fcrenin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk gelmesidir. Talebin, adli tatil bitimindeki \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. S\u00fcre bu zamana kadar uzar ama bundan \u00f6nce yani, adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde talep yapmak da m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.[3] Adli tatilde bak\u0131labilecek tutuklu gibi i\u015flerde s\u00fcre\u00e7 devam eder. \u00d6rne\u011fin duru\u015fma yap\u0131labilir, delil toplanabilir, karar verilebilir ama bu hallerde bile e\u011fer s\u00fcrenin son g\u00fcn\u00fc adli tatile denk gelirse ilgililer aleyhine s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mez. \u0130stenmesi halinde, adli tatil bitimindeki \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131labilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyoruz. Aksi bir d\u00fczenleme olmad\u0131k\u00e7a bir i\u015fe s\u0131rf adli tatilde b\u0131k\u0131l\u0131yor olmas\u0131, s\u00fcrenin aleyhe i\u015flemesi anlam\u0131na gelmeyecektir. Buradaki ayr\u0131nt\u0131 \u015fu halde kendini g\u00f6sterebilir: Adli tatilde bak\u0131labilen bir i\u015f ise yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine kanun yolu incelemesi yap\u0131labilir ve ba\u015fvuru sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilir. \u0130stenmesi halinde adli tatil sonras\u0131nda s\u00fcresinde de ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131labilir. Adli tatilde bak\u0131lamayan bir i\u015f ise ba\u015fvuru yine yap\u0131labilir ve merciine g\u00f6nderilebilir ama merciince kanun yolu incelemesi yap\u0131lamaz ve talep karara ba\u011flanamaz.[4]<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu karar\u0131na g\u00f6re, yasa yolu s\u00fcresi adli tatilde ba\u015flamaz. Karardaki \u015fu nitelendirmeye g\u00f6re 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda ceza i\u015flerini g\u00f6ren makam ve mahkemelerin 20.07.2012- 31.08.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ara vermeleri de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ilam\u0131n adli tatile rastlayacak \u015fekilde 20.07.2012 tarihinde Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na teslim edilmesi nedeniyle adli tatilden sonra ba\u015flayacak olan itiraz s\u00fcresinin 30.09.2012 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi\u2026[5]<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131na g\u00f6re h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, tebligat adli tatilden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve s\u00fcrenin sonu adli tatil i\u00e7ine denk geliyorsa, temyiz s\u00fcresinin, adli tatilin bitiminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle san\u0131k HP\u2019nin 02.08.2016 tarihli temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu belirtilerek temyiz ba\u015fvuru kabul edilmi\u015ftir.[6] Ba\u015fka bir kararda da kat\u0131lan bakanl\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n adli tatil i\u00e7inde ve 12.08.2015 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 331\/4. maddesine g\u00f6re adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ve adli tatil bitimini takip eden g\u00fcn itibar\u0131yla i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayan temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde vaki olan 01.09.2015 havale tarihli temyiz ba\u015fvurusu s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fundan temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin 11.09.2015 tarihli ek karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve esas\u0131n incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.[7]\u2019[8] Ba\u015fka bir karara g\u00f6re san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 07.09.2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015f ise de, temyiz s\u00fcresinin adli tatile rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi ve tatil bitiminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn s\u00fcre ile uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin CMK\u2019n\u0131n 291. ve 331\/4. maddesinde belirlenen s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7tikten sonra verildi\u011fi nedeniyle reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.[9]<\/p>\n
Kabahat yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde itiraz\u0131n iptalinde s\u00fcrenin ne olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine dair, \u00f6zel daire \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun 27. maddesi uyar\u0131nca sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatile rastlamas\u0131 durumunda, CMK’n\u0131n 331. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulan\u0131p uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. \u2026\u0130dari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu’nun 27. maddesi uyar\u0131nca sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatile rastlamas\u0131 durumunda, CMK’n\u0131n 331. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulanabilece\u011fi ve ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatilde i\u015flemeyece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.[10]<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flerden olmayan davaya adli tatil i\u00e7erisinde bak\u0131larak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemenin kanuna uygun te\u015fekk\u00fcl etmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclerek bozma gerek\u00e7esi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.[11] Ba\u015fka karara g\u00f6re ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 10.04.2007 tarih ve 2007\/8-78 Esas ve 2007\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331\/4 maddesi kapsam\u0131nda, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, tebligat adli tatilden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve s\u00fcrenin sonu adli tatil i\u00e7ine denk geliyorsa, istinaf s\u00fcresinin, adli tatilin bitiminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn 29\/07\/2024 tarihinde adli tatil i\u00e7inde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin h\u00fckm\u00fc 03\/09\/2024 tarihinde istinaf etti\u011fi, bu nedenle istinaf isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddi nedenleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.[12] Kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z istinaf karar\u0131na g\u00f6re; 17\/07\/2024 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilen h\u00fckm\u00fc, 04\/09\/2024 tarihinde istinaf eden kat\u0131lan vekilinin istinaf isteminin h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan CMK’n\u0131n 273\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen iki haftal\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 279\/1-b. maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.[13] Burada tebligat\u0131n adli tatilden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemi yoktur. S\u00fcrenin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk geldi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Son g\u00fcn zaten hafta sonuna denk gelmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre, 2 Eyl\u00fcl 2024 tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flayacak olup 5 Eyl\u00fclde (dahil) sona erecektir. Ba\u015fka karara g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda 26\/05\/2022 tarihinde karar verildi\u011fi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa 28\/07\/2022 tarihinde, adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc ile adli tatilin 20 Temmuz-31 A\u011fustos tarihleri aras\u0131n\u0131 kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren 3 g\u00fcn uzayan s\u00fcre, hafta sonuna rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ilk i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 01\/09\/2022 g\u00fcn\u00fc istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 06\/09\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan; san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine dair 15\/09\/2022 tarihli ek karar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun oldu\u011fu ve kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir.[14]\u2019[15] Kanaatimizce, istinaf s\u00fcresi adli tatilin bitiminde ba\u015flamaz. Ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fc adli tatile denk gelmesi halinde bu s\u00fcre \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzar. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ilk i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 01\/09\/2022 g\u00fcn\u00fc istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilir. Aksi halde, yani ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatil bitimi ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, maddedeki \u201cBu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r\u201d ibaresinin anlam\u0131 kalmayacakt\u0131r. Bunun uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in maddede \u201cba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcn ba\u015flar\u201d \u015feklinde veya bu anlama gelebilecek bir ibare olmas\u0131 gerekirdi.[16] Bu y\u00f6ndeki, yani s\u00fcrenin tatil bitiminde ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler, 14\/02\/1934 tarih, 47\/1 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 10\/04\/2007 tarih ve 2007\/8-78 E, 2007\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na da dayand\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.[17]<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle adli tatile denk gelen s\u00fcre i\u015flemez. Adli y\u0131l\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn dahil, \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcne yani, 3 Eyl\u00fcl\u2019e (dahil) kadar uzam\u0131\u015f olur. E\u011fer adli y\u0131l ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 resmi tatile denk gelirse, \u00f6rne\u011fin 1 Eyl\u00fcl, cumartesi veya pazar g\u00fcn\u00fcne denk gelirse, bu s\u00fcreler, \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcreye ilave edilir.<\/p>\n
Kaynak:<\/p>\n
As\u0131m EKREN, Uygulamada \u0130stinaf Ceza El Kitab\u0131, Filiz Kitabevi, 2024, 3.Bask\u0131<\/p>\n
—————<\/p>\n
[1] 11.CD, 03.04.2024, E.2021\/9644, K.2024\/4761: San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa 04.08.2016 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 331 inci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcreler i\u015flemeyece\u011finden ve temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk gelmesi nedeniyle temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu…<\/p>\n
[2] -12.CD, 06.05.2024, E.2021\/7734, K.2024\/2098: CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, bu s\u00fcrelerin tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenleme nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekiline 15.07.2019 tarihinde tebli\u011finin ard\u0131ndan adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde 06.08.2019 tarihinde verdi\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu\u2026<\/p>\n
[3] 1.CD, 29.05.2025, E.2025\/1414, K.2025\/4424: Kat\u0131lan vekilinin, 13.07.2024 tarihinde us\u00fbl\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011f edilen karar\u0131 06.09.2024 havale tarihli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ile temyiz etmesine ve CMK\u2019n\u0131n 291\/1. Maddesinde belirlenen iki haftal\u0131k temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk gelmesine g\u00f6re; 331\/1-4. maddeleri gere\u011fince temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn 03.09.2024 tarihine kadar uzad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kat\u0131lan vekilinin s\u00fcreden sonra temyiz isteminde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz isteminin, 298\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca,reddine\u2026<\/p>\n
[4] 10.CD, 20.05.2024, E.2023\/13323, K.2024\/18904: 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 173 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck itiraz s\u00fcresinin bitiminin adli tatile rastlamas\u0131 nedeniyle, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 331 inci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “Adl\u00ee tatile rastlayan s\u00fcreler i\u015flemez. Bu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca adl\u00ee tatile rastlayan d\u00f6nemde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f ge\u00e7erli olmakla birlikte tatilde s\u00fcre i\u015flemeyece\u011finden, itiraz s\u00fcresi hen\u00fcz dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle de an\u0131lan karar kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi halde 30.07.2021 tarihinde denetimli serbestli\u011fe g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, bu itibarla kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesi karar\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun kesinle\u015fmeden m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7e yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131\u2026<\/p>\n
[5] CGK, 16.09.2014, E.2013\/4-544, K.2014\/385<\/p>\n
[6] 6.CD, 22.05.2024, E.2023\/7082, K.2024\/6509<\/p>\n
[7] 5.CD, 21.03.2024, E.2021\/6223, K.2024\/3243.<\/p>\n
[8] 3.CD, 11.03.2024, E.2021\/4157, K.2024\/3740: B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafine 13.07.2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin 29.07.2020 tarihinde karar\u0131 temyiz etti\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresinin adli tatil i\u00e7erisinde sona ermesi nedeniyle, CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesine g\u00f6re adli tatile rastlayan d\u00f6nemde temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeyece\u011finden san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015f, tebli\u011fnamede bu konuda red isteyen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
[9] 3.CD, 23.03.2025, E.2022\/13957, K.2025\/9348<\/p>\n
[10] CGK, 22.02.2022, E.2021\/19-290, K.2022\/111; 22.02.2022, E.2021\/19-291, K.2022\/112.<\/p>\n
[11] \u0130stanbul BAM, 7.CD, 21.10.2016, E.2016\/6, K.2016\/10; 19.CD, 27.12.2018, E.2018\/3908, K.2018\/4148.<\/p>\n
[12] Kayseri BAM, 4.CD, 30.06.2025, E.2024\/5169, K.2025\/1371<\/p>\n
[13] Ankara BAM, 12.CD, 26.05.2025, E.2024\/1736, K.2025\/1360<\/p>\n
[14] \u0130stanbul BAM, 32.CD, 14.02.2023, E.2022\/3219, K.2023\/502<\/p>\n
[15] \u0130stanbul BAM, 32.CD, 28.09.2021, E.2020\/5453, K.2021\/4313: \u2026karar\u0131n 10\/07\/2020 tarihinde m\u00fc\u015fteki vekilinin yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekiline 27\/07\/2020 tarihinde adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde tebli\u011f olundu\u011fu, CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekili taraf\u0131ndan 04\/08\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekilinin istinaf talebi s\u00fcresinde kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede\u2026<\/p>\n
[16] \u0130zmir BAM, 11.CD, 26.11.2021, E.2021\/2131, K.2021\/2412: H\u00fckm\u00fcn kat\u0131lan vekiline 16\/07\/2021 tarihinde tefhim edildi\u011fi, CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesinin h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin 03\/09\/2021 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi, ancak kat\u0131lan vekilinin yasal ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 07\/09\/2021 tarihinde istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; CMK’nun 279\/1-b. maddesi uyar\u0131nca s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine\u2026<\/p>\n
[17] Bursa BAM, 9.CD, 13.07.2021, E.2020\/1896, K.2021\/1838: \u2026adli tatil i\u00e7erisinde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011flerde, istinaf s\u00fcresinin adli tatilin bitiminden itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131, dosyaya konu olayda istinaf s\u00fcresinin adli tatil bitimi olan 01\/09\/2020 tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin 07\/09\/2020 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi, ancak kat\u0131lan\u0131n yasal ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 08\/09\/2020 tarihinde istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, CMK’n\u0131n 279\/1-b. maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine\u2026<\/p>\n
\u200bAdli tatilin \u00fclkemize, yarg\u0131m\u0131za, hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131m\u0131za hay\u0131rl\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131 diliyoruz.<\/p>\n
\u00d6zet olarak bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma; adli y\u0131l\u0131n merak edilen en \u00f6nemli konular\u0131ndan birisinin de bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde itiraz, istinaf ve temyiz gibi kanun yolu s\u00fcrelerinin durup durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ne \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi gerekti\u011fi hakk\u0131ndad\u0131r. Adil tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde ilk derece mahkemesince verilen bir karar\u0131n istinaf edilmesi veya b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince verilen bir karar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi ya da itiraza tabi bir karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle adli tatil, kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde, ister adli tatilde bak\u0131labilen bir i\u015f olsun veya olmas\u0131n, herhangi bir engel olu\u015fturmaz. Yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru kayda al\u0131n\u0131p kanun yolu inceleme merciine g\u00f6nderilir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan adli tatilin bir \u00f6nemi yoktur. Hatta adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan tebligat da ge\u00e7erlidir.[1] Adil tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u00f6nem arz eden husus, s\u00fcrelerin i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fidir. Bu ba\u015fl\u0131kta ceza muhakemesinde adli tatile denk gelen s\u00fcreler i\u015fler mi? Bu y\u00f6ndeki talepler adli tatil sonras\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131labilir mi? B\u00f6yle bir durumda ne yapmak gerekir? Yasa ve uygulama ne y\u00f6ndedir? \u015feklindeki sorular\u0131 ele alaca\u011f\u0131z.<\/p>\n
5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331. maddesinde adli tatile ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, ceza i\u015flerini g\u00f6ren makam ve mahkemeler her y\u0131l bir eyl\u00fclde ba\u015flamak \u00fczere, yirmi temmuzdan (dahil) otuz bir a\u011fustosa (dahil) kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ara verirler. Soru\u015fturma ile tutuklu i\u015flere ili\u015fkin kovu\u015fturmalar\u0131n ve ivedi say\u0131lacak di\u011fer hususlar\u0131n tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde ne suretle yerine getirilece\u011fi, H\u00e2kimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kurulunca belirlenir. Tatil s\u00fcresince b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemeleri ile Yarg\u0131tay, yaln\u0131z tutuklu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ili\u015fkin veya Me\u015fhud Su\u00e7lar\u0131n Muhakeme Usul\u00fc Kanunu gere\u011fince g\u00f6r\u00fclen i\u015flerin incelemelerini yapar. Adl\u00ee tatile rastlayan s\u00fcreler i\u015flemez. Bu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.[2]<\/p>\n
Burada dikkat edilmesi gereken en \u00f6nemli husus, s\u00fcrenin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk gelmesidir. Talebin, adli tatil bitimindeki \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 \u015fart de\u011fildir. S\u00fcre bu zamana kadar uzar ama bundan \u00f6nce yani, adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde talep yapmak da m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr.[3] Adli tatilde bak\u0131labilecek tutuklu gibi i\u015flerde s\u00fcre\u00e7 devam eder. \u00d6rne\u011fin duru\u015fma yap\u0131labilir, delil toplanabilir, karar verilebilir ama bu hallerde bile e\u011fer s\u00fcrenin son g\u00fcn\u00fc adli tatile denk gelirse ilgililer aleyhine s\u00fcre ge\u00e7mez. \u0130stenmesi halinde, adli tatil bitimindeki \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131labilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyoruz. Aksi bir d\u00fczenleme olmad\u0131k\u00e7a bir i\u015fe s\u0131rf adli tatilde b\u0131k\u0131l\u0131yor olmas\u0131, s\u00fcrenin aleyhe i\u015flemesi anlam\u0131na gelmeyecektir. Buradaki ayr\u0131nt\u0131 \u015fu halde kendini g\u00f6sterebilir: Adli tatilde bak\u0131labilen bir i\u015f ise yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine kanun yolu incelemesi yap\u0131labilir ve ba\u015fvuru sonu\u00e7 do\u011furabilir. \u0130stenmesi halinde adli tatil sonras\u0131nda s\u00fcresinde de ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131labilir. Adli tatilde bak\u0131lamayan bir i\u015f ise ba\u015fvuru yine yap\u0131labilir ve merciine g\u00f6nderilebilir ama merciince kanun yolu incelemesi yap\u0131lamaz ve talep karara ba\u011flanamaz.[4]<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu karar\u0131na g\u00f6re, yasa yolu s\u00fcresi adli tatilde ba\u015flamaz. Karardaki \u015fu nitelendirmeye g\u00f6re 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda ceza i\u015flerini g\u00f6ren makam ve mahkemelerin 20.07.2012- 31.08.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ara vermeleri de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ilam\u0131n adli tatile rastlayacak \u015fekilde 20.07.2012 tarihinde Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na teslim edilmesi nedeniyle adli tatilden sonra ba\u015flayacak olan itiraz s\u00fcresinin 30.09.2012 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi\u2026[5]<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay karar\u0131na g\u00f6re h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, tebligat adli tatilden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve s\u00fcrenin sonu adli tatil i\u00e7ine denk geliyorsa, temyiz s\u00fcresinin, adli tatilin bitiminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle san\u0131k HP\u2019nin 02.08.2016 tarihli temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu belirtilerek temyiz ba\u015fvuru kabul edilmi\u015ftir.[6] Ba\u015fka bir kararda da kat\u0131lan bakanl\u0131\u011fa gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n adli tatil i\u00e7inde ve 12.08.2015 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 331\/4. maddesine g\u00f6re adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ve adli tatil bitimini takip eden g\u00fcn itibar\u0131yla i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayan temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde vaki olan 01.09.2015 havale tarihli temyiz ba\u015fvurusu s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fundan temyiz isteminin reddine ili\u015fkin 11.09.2015 tarihli ek karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve esas\u0131n incelenmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.[7]\u2019[8] Ba\u015fka bir karara g\u00f6re san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 07.09.2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7esi ile temyiz talebinde bulunmu\u015f ise de, temyiz s\u00fcresinin adli tatile rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi ve tatil bitiminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn s\u00fcre ile uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin CMK\u2019n\u0131n 291. ve 331\/4. maddesinde belirlenen s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7tikten sonra verildi\u011fi nedeniyle reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.[9]<\/p>\n
Kabahat yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde itiraz\u0131n iptalinde s\u00fcrenin ne olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine dair, \u00f6zel daire \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun 27. maddesi uyar\u0131nca sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatile rastlamas\u0131 durumunda, CMK’n\u0131n 331. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulan\u0131p uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir. \u2026\u0130dari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunu’nun 27. maddesi uyar\u0131nca sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fine yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatile rastlamas\u0131 durumunda, CMK’n\u0131n 331. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulanabilece\u011fi ve ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatilde i\u015flemeyece\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.[10]<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesi kararlar\u0131nda CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flerden olmayan davaya adli tatil i\u00e7erisinde bak\u0131larak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 nedeniyle mahkemenin kanuna uygun te\u015fekk\u00fcl etmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclerek bozma gerek\u00e7esi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.[11] Ba\u015fka karara g\u00f6re ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 10.04.2007 tarih ve 2007\/8-78 Esas ve 2007\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331\/4 maddesi kapsam\u0131nda, adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, tebligat adli tatilden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve s\u00fcrenin sonu adli tatil i\u00e7ine denk geliyorsa, istinaf s\u00fcresinin, adli tatilin bitiminden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yoklu\u011funda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn 29\/07\/2024 tarihinde adli tatil i\u00e7inde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin h\u00fckm\u00fc 03\/09\/2024 tarihinde istinaf etti\u011fi, bu nedenle istinaf isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddi nedenleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.[12] Kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z istinaf karar\u0131na g\u00f6re; 17\/07\/2024 tarihinde tebli\u011f edilen h\u00fckm\u00fc, 04\/09\/2024 tarihinde istinaf eden kat\u0131lan vekilinin istinaf isteminin h\u00fck\u00fcm tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan CMK’n\u0131n 273\/1. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen iki haftal\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 279\/1-b. maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.[13] Burada tebligat\u0131n adli tatilden \u00f6nce yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemi yoktur. S\u00fcrenin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk geldi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Son g\u00fcn zaten hafta sonuna denk gelmi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre, 2 Eyl\u00fcl 2024 tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flayacak olup 5 Eyl\u00fclde (dahil) sona erecektir. Ba\u015fka karara g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda 26\/05\/2022 tarihinde karar verildi\u011fi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa 28\/07\/2022 tarihinde, adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc ile adli tatilin 20 Temmuz-31 A\u011fustos tarihleri aras\u0131n\u0131 kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren 3 g\u00fcn uzayan s\u00fcre, hafta sonuna rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, ilk i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 01\/09\/2022 g\u00fcn\u00fc istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin 06\/09\/2019 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan; san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine dair 15\/09\/2022 tarihli ek karar\u0131n hukuki de\u011ferden yoksun oldu\u011fu ve kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden ek karar kald\u0131r\u0131larak, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015ftir.[14]\u2019[15] Kanaatimizce, istinaf s\u00fcresi adli tatilin bitiminde ba\u015flamaz. Ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fc adli tatile denk gelmesi halinde bu s\u00fcre \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzar. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ilk i\u015f g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 01\/09\/2022 g\u00fcn\u00fc istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilir. Aksi halde, yani ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin adli tatil bitimi ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde, maddedeki \u201cBu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r\u201d ibaresinin anlam\u0131 kalmayacakt\u0131r. Bunun uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in maddede \u201cba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcn ba\u015flar\u201d \u015feklinde veya bu anlama gelebilecek bir ibare olmas\u0131 gerekirdi.[16] Bu y\u00f6ndeki, yani s\u00fcrenin tatil bitiminde ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler, 14\/02\/1934 tarih, 47\/1 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131 ve Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 10\/04\/2007 tarih ve 2007\/8-78 E, 2007\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na da dayand\u0131r\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.[17]<\/p>\n
Sonu\u00e7 itibariyle adli tatile denk gelen s\u00fcre i\u015flemez. Adli y\u0131l\u0131n ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcn dahil, \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcne yani, 3 Eyl\u00fcl\u2019e (dahil) kadar uzam\u0131\u015f olur. E\u011fer adli y\u0131l ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131 resmi tatile denk gelirse, \u00f6rne\u011fin 1 Eyl\u00fcl, cumartesi veya pazar g\u00fcn\u00fcne denk gelirse, bu s\u00fcreler, \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcreye ilave edilir.<\/p>\n
Kaynak:<\/p>\n
As\u0131m EKREN, Uygulamada \u0130stinaf Ceza El Kitab\u0131, Filiz Kitabevi, 2024, 3.Bask\u0131<\/p>\n
—————<\/p>\n
[1] 11.CD, 03.04.2024, E.2021\/9644, K.2024\/4761: San\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda verilen karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa 04.08.2016 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile rastlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 331 inci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcreler i\u015flemeyece\u011finden ve temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk gelmesi nedeniyle temyiz isteminin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu…<\/p>\n
[2] -12.CD, 06.05.2024, E.2021\/7734, K.2024\/2098: CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince adli tatile rastlayan s\u00fcrelerin i\u015flemeyece\u011fi, bu s\u00fcrelerin tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenleme nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n davac\u0131 vekiline 15.07.2019 tarihinde tebli\u011finin ard\u0131ndan adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde 06.08.2019 tarihinde verdi\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu\u2026<\/p>\n
[3] 1.CD, 29.05.2025, E.2025\/1414, K.2025\/4424: Kat\u0131lan vekilinin, 13.07.2024 tarihinde us\u00fbl\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011f edilen karar\u0131 06.09.2024 havale tarihli temyiz dilek\u00e7esi ile temyiz etmesine ve CMK\u2019n\u0131n 291\/1. Maddesinde belirlenen iki haftal\u0131k temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn adli tatile denk gelmesine g\u00f6re; 331\/1-4. maddeleri gere\u011fince temyiz s\u00fcresinin son g\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn 03.09.2024 tarihine kadar uzad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ancak kat\u0131lan vekilinin s\u00fcreden sonra temyiz isteminde bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz isteminin, 298\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca,reddine\u2026<\/p>\n
[4] 10.CD, 20.05.2024, E.2023\/13323, K.2024\/18904: 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 173 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck itiraz s\u00fcresinin bitiminin adli tatile rastlamas\u0131 nedeniyle, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 331 inci maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “Adl\u00ee tatile rastlayan s\u00fcreler i\u015flemez. Bu s\u00fcreler tatilin bitti\u011fi g\u00fcnden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 g\u00fcn uzat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme uyar\u0131nca adl\u00ee tatile rastlayan d\u00f6nemde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f ge\u00e7erli olmakla birlikte tatilde s\u00fcre i\u015flemeyece\u011finden, itiraz s\u00fcresi hen\u00fcz dolmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu nedenle de an\u0131lan karar kesinle\u015fmedi\u011fi halde 30.07.2021 tarihinde denetimli serbestli\u011fe g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, bu itibarla kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ertelenmesi karar\u0131 usul\u00fcne uygun kesinle\u015fmeden m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck\u00e7e yap\u0131lan i\u015flemlerin hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmayaca\u011f\u0131\u2026<\/p>\n
[5] CGK, 16.09.2014, E.2013\/4-544, K.2014\/385<\/p>\n
[6] 6.CD, 22.05.2024, E.2023\/7082, K.2024\/6509<\/p>\n
[7] 5.CD, 21.03.2024, E.2021\/6223, K.2024\/3243.<\/p>\n
[8] 3.CD, 11.03.2024, E.2021\/4157, K.2024\/3740: B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafine 13.07.2020 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin 29.07.2020 tarihinde karar\u0131 temyiz etti\u011fi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck yasal temyiz s\u00fcresinin adli tatil i\u00e7erisinde sona ermesi nedeniyle, CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesine g\u00f6re adli tatile rastlayan d\u00f6nemde temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeyece\u011finden san\u0131k m\u00fcdafinin temyiz talebinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015f, tebli\u011fnamede bu konuda red isteyen d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
[9] 3.CD, 23.03.2025, E.2022\/13957, K.2025\/9348<\/p>\n
[10] CGK, 22.02.2022, E.2021\/19-290, K.2022\/111; 22.02.2022, E.2021\/19-291, K.2022\/112.<\/p>\n
[11] \u0130stanbul BAM, 7.CD, 21.10.2016, E.2016\/6, K.2016\/10; 19.CD, 27.12.2018, E.2018\/3908, K.2018\/4148.<\/p>\n
[12] Kayseri BAM, 4.CD, 30.06.2025, E.2024\/5169, K.2025\/1371<\/p>\n
[13] Ankara BAM, 12.CD, 26.05.2025, E.2024\/1736, K.2025\/1360<\/p>\n
[14] \u0130stanbul BAM, 32.CD, 14.02.2023, E.2022\/3219, K.2023\/502<\/p>\n
[15] \u0130stanbul BAM, 32.CD, 28.09.2021, E.2020\/5453, K.2021\/4313: \u2026karar\u0131n 10\/07\/2020 tarihinde m\u00fc\u015fteki vekilinin yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekiline 27\/07\/2020 tarihinde adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde tebli\u011f olundu\u011fu, CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekili taraf\u0131ndan 04\/08\/2020 tarihli dilek\u00e7eyle adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde istinaf yasa yoluna ba\u015fvuruldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekilinin istinaf talebi s\u00fcresinde kabul edilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede\u2026<\/p>\n
[16] \u0130zmir BAM, 11.CD, 26.11.2021, E.2021\/2131, K.2021\/2412: H\u00fckm\u00fcn kat\u0131lan vekiline 16\/07\/2021 tarihinde tefhim edildi\u011fi, CMK’n\u0131n 331\/4. maddesinin h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin 03\/09\/2021 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi, ancak kat\u0131lan vekilinin yasal ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 07\/09\/2021 tarihinde istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; CMK’nun 279\/1-b. maddesi uyar\u0131nca s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun reddine\u2026<\/p>\n
[17] Bursa BAM, 9.CD, 13.07.2021, E.2020\/1896, K.2021\/1838: \u2026adli tatil i\u00e7erisinde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011flerde, istinaf s\u00fcresinin adli tatilin bitiminden itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131, dosyaya konu olayda istinaf s\u00fcresinin adli tatil bitimi olan 01\/09\/2020 tarihinden itibaren ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck istinaf ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin 07\/09\/2020 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi, ancak kat\u0131lan\u0131n yasal ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 08\/09\/2020 tarihinde istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurdu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, CMK’n\u0131n 279\/1-b. maddesi gere\u011fince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun s\u00fcre y\u00f6n\u00fcnden reddine\u2026\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Adli tatilin \u00fclkemize, yarg\u0131m\u0131za, hukuk\u00e7ular\u0131m\u0131za hay\u0131rl\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131 diliyoruz. \u00d6zet olarak bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma; adli y\u0131l\u0131n merak edilen en \u00f6nemli konular\u0131ndan birisinin de bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde itiraz, istinaf ve temyiz gibi kanun yolu s\u00fcrelerinin durup durmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ne \u015fekilde hareket edilmesi gerekti\u011fi hakk\u0131ndad\u0131r. Adil tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde ilk derece mahkemesince verilen bir karar\u0131n istinaf edilmesi veya b\u00f6lge adliye mahkemesince verilen bir karar\u0131n temyiz edilmesi ya da itiraza tabi bir karara kar\u015f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle adli tatil, kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde, ister adli tatilde bak\u0131labilen bir i\u015f olsun veya olmas\u0131n, herhangi bir engel olu\u015fturmaz. Yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru kayda al\u0131n\u0131p kanun yolu inceleme merciine g\u00f6nderilir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan adli tatilin bir \u00f6nemi yoktur. Hatta adli tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lan tebligat da ge\u00e7erlidir.[1] Adil tatil s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde \u00f6nem arz eden husus, s\u00fcrelerin i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fidir. Bu ba\u015fl\u0131kta ceza muhakemesinde adli tatile denk gelen s\u00fcreler i\u015fler mi? Bu y\u00f6ndeki talepler adli tatil sonras\u0131na b\u0131rak\u0131labilir mi? B\u00f6yle bir durumda ne yapmak gerekir? Yasa ve uygulama ne y\u00f6ndedir? \u015feklindeki sorular\u0131 ele alaca\u011f\u0131z. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n 331. maddesinde adli tatile ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Buna g\u00f6re, ceza i\u015flerini g\u00f6ren makam ve mahkemeler her y\u0131l bir eyl\u00fclde ba\u015flamak \u00fczere, yirmi temmuzdan (dahil) otuz bir a\u011fustosa (dahil) kadar \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ara verirler. Soru\u015fturma ile …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152918","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n