T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
ERHAN ARSLAN BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/13674)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mutlu ALAF<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Erhan ARSLAN<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan ba\u015fvurucunun ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonunda kadroya ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in idareye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu G\u0131da, Tar\u0131m ve Hayvanc\u0131l\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tar\u0131m Reformu Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Arazi Toplula\u015ft\u0131rma Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 emrinde ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7i olarak 2011-2017 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu 5\/1\/2018 tarihinde idareye, 27\/6\/1989 tarihli ve 375 say\u0131l\u0131 657 Say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu, 926 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri Personel Kanunu, 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu, 2914 Say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Personel Kanunu, 5434 Say\u0131l\u0131 T.C. Emekli Sand\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kanunu ile Di\u011fer Baz\u0131 Kanun ve Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamelerde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131, Devlet Memurlar\u0131 ve Di\u011fer Kamu G\u00f6revlilerine Memuriyet Taban Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve K\u0131dem Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Ek Tazminat \u00d6denmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’ye (375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) eklenen ge\u00e7ici 23. ve 24. maddelere istinaden ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare bu talebi, ba\u015fvurucunun istihdam ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu, ret i\u015fleminin iptali ve maddi kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi talebiyle 17\/5\/2018 tarihinde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada 18\/4\/2019 tarihli kararla i\u015flemin iptaline, maddi kay\u0131p talebi ile ilgili olarak ise karar verilmesine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedilmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme gerek\u00e7esinde; 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda olabilmek i\u00e7in mevzuatta belirtilen idarelerin b\u00fcnyesinde istihdam edilmek, bu istihdam\u0131n personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda olmas\u0131 ve bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n 4\/12\/2017 tarihi (do\u011fum izni, hastal\u0131k izni, askerlik izni vb. istisna) itibar\u0131yla devam ediyor olmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n ko\u015ful olarak arand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131na de\u011finmi\u015ftir. Daha sonra bu \u015fartlar\u0131 somut olaya uygulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun 30\/4\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla sona eren i\u015f kapsam\u0131nda (T\u00fcrk M\u00fchendislik M\u00fc\u015favirlik ve M\u00fcteahhitlik A.\u015e. taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya sunulan i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesinden i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesinde 18 numaral\u0131 kodun kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, 18 numaral\u0131 kodun ise i\u015fin sona ermesi anlam\u0131na geldi\u011fi) ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonunda kadroya ge\u00e7ebilmek i\u00e7in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurusunun de\u011ferlendirmeye al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kanaatine varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Karara kar\u015f\u0131 idare, istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 1. \u0130dari Dava Dairesi (Daire) taraf\u0131ndan 17\/11\/2021 tarihinde Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Daire gerek\u00e7esinde; ba\u015fvurucunun 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kapsam\u0131nda 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla mevzuatta an\u0131lan idareler b\u00fcnyesinde g\u00f6rev yapmamas\u0131 nedeniyle s\u00f6z konusu KHK h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fart\u0131 sa\u011flamamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvurusunun reddedilmesine ili\u015fkin daval\u0131 idare i\u015fleminde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fine de\u011finmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 21\/1\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 14\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
8. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinde daimi i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7irilmeyle ilgili \u015fartlar d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan maddenin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“5018 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanuna ekli (I), (II), (III) ve (IV) say\u0131l\u0131 cetvellerde yer alan kamu idareleri (M\u0130T M\u00fcste\u015farl\u0131\u011f\u0131 hari\u00e7) ile bunlara ba\u011fl\u0131 d\u00f6ner sermayeli kurulu\u015flar, bu Kanuna ekli (I) say\u0131l\u0131 listede yer alan idarelerin merkez ve ta\u015fra te\u015fkilatlar\u0131nda; \u00f6demeleri merkezi y\u00f6netim, sosyal g\u00fcvenlik kurumu, fon, kefalet sand\u0131\u011f\u0131, yat\u0131r\u0131m izleme ve koordinasyon ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, gen\u00e7lik hizmetleri ve spor il m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden veya d\u00f6ner sermaye b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden, an\u0131lan liste kapsam\u0131ndaki di\u011fer idareler i\u00e7in ise kendi b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden kar\u015f\u0131lanan 4734 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve di\u011fer mevzuattaki h\u00fck\u00fcmler uyar\u0131nca personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri kapsam\u0131nda y\u00fckleniciler taraf\u0131ndan 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmakta olanlar; …”<\/p>\n
9. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesinin (16) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ise \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Birinci f\u0131kra kapsam\u0131ndaki idarelerin ayn\u0131 f\u0131krada belirtilen b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden kar\u015f\u0131lanan ve onuncu f\u0131kra h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131l boyunca devam etme \u015fart\u0131 hari\u00e7 di\u011fer t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan hizmet al\u0131mlar\u0131ndan; s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla devam edenlerde bu tarih itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar, s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri bu tarih itibar\u0131yla devam etmeyip 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda sona erenlerde ise s\u00f6zle\u015fme s\u00fcresinin sona erdi\u011fi tarihte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olanlar, birinci f\u0131krada \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131malar\u0131 ve en son hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen d\u00f6nem ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcreleriyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmak kayd\u0131yla, birinci f\u0131kra h\u00fck\u00fcmleri \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonlar\u0131nda istihdam edilmek \u00fczere ba\u015fvurabilirler. Bu maddenin di\u011fer h\u00fck\u00fcmleri bu f\u0131kra kapsam\u0131ndakiler i\u00e7in k\u0131yasen uygulan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
10. 1\/1\/2018 tarihli ve 30288 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Kamu Kurum ve Kurulu\u015flar\u0131nda Personel \u00c7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na Dayal\u0131 Hizmet Al\u0131m\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri Kapsam\u0131nda \u00c7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmakta Olan \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilerin S\u00fcrekli \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Kadrolar\u0131na veya Mahalli \u0130dare \u015eirketlerinde \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Stat\u00fcs\u00fcne Ge\u00e7irilmesine \u0130li\u015fkin 375 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin Ge\u00e7ici 23 ve Ge\u00e7ici 24 \u00dcnc\u00fc Maddelerinin Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Usul ve Esaslar’\u0131n (Usul ve Esaslar) 19. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Bu Usul ve Esaslar\u0131n 3 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinde belirtilen idarelerin ayn\u0131 maddede belirtilen b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden kar\u015f\u0131lanan ve personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n \u201cy\u0131l boyunca devam etme \u015fart\u0131\u201d hari\u00e7 di\u011fer t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden; 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla devam edenlerden bu tarih itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar ile 2017 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde 4\/12\/2017 tarihinden \u00f6nce sona ermi\u015f olanlarda s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin s\u00fcresinin sona erdi\u011fi tarihte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olanlar, bu Usul ve Esaslar\u0131n 5 inci maddesinde aranan \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131malar\u0131 ve en son hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen d\u00f6nem ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma s\u00fcreleriyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmak kayd\u0131yla, ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonlar\u0131nda istihdam edilmek \u00fczere ba\u015fvurabilirler.”<\/p>\n
III. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesine g\u00f6re ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ba\u015fvurdu\u011funu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kendisinde 4\/12\/2017 tarihinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yor olma \u015fart\u0131n\u0131n aranamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bariz takdir hatas\u0131 yap\u0131larak adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; idareden temin edilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f yaz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerinin ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011fi konusunda yap\u0131lacak incelemede Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan [1. B.], B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 48. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular\u0131n Mahkemece kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilebilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun ba\u015fvurular kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilen kanun yolunda g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken hususlara ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin bireysel ba\u015fvuruda incelenemeyece\u011fi kurala ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Ahmet Sa\u011flam [2. B.], B. No: 2013\/3351, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 41).<\/p>\n
16. Di\u011fer taraftan Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00e7ok istisnai durumlarda temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerden biri ile do\u011frudan ilgili olmayan bir \u015fik\u00e2yeti kanun yolunda g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken hususlara ili\u015fkin yasak kapsam\u0131na girmeden inceleyebilir. A\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik nedeniyle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetinin temelden sars\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki usule ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvencelerin anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le geldi\u011fi \u00e7ok istisnai h\u00e2llerde, asl\u0131nda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucuna ili\u015fkin olan bu durumun bizatihi kendisi usule ili\u015fkin bir g\u00fcvenceye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f olur. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Anayasa Mahkemesinin yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin de\u011ferlendirmelerinin usule ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvenceleri anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le getirip getirmedi\u011fini ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik nedeniyle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetinin temelden sars\u0131l\u0131p sars\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemesi yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucunu de\u011ferlendirdi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez. Sonu\u00e7 olarak Anayasa Mahkemesi yarg\u0131lama mercilerinin delillerle ilgili de\u011ferlendirmelerine ancak a\u00e7\u0131k bir keyf\u00eelik ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki usule ili\u015fkin g\u00fcvenceleri anlams\u0131z h\u00e2le getiren bir uygulama varsa m\u00fcdahale edebilecektir (Ferhat Kara [GK], B. No: 2018\/15231, 4\/6\/2020, \u00a7 149).<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130smet Murtezao\u011flu karar\u0131nda ([1. B.], B. No: 2018\/17312, 18\/10\/2022, \u00a7 40) a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki h\u00e2llerde asl\u0131nda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucuna ili\u015fkin olan bir durumun bizatihi kendisinin usule ili\u015fkin bir g\u00fcvenceye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kabul edilebilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir:<\/p>\n
i. Somut olayda uygulanan veya uygulanmas\u0131 gereken hukuk kurallar\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilebilir herhangi bir yorumuna dayan\u0131lmamas\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. Delil ile bu delilin ispat arac\u0131 olarak kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 vak\u0131a aras\u0131nda kurulan ba\u011f\u0131n kabul edilebilir bir muhakemeye dayanmamas\u0131 veya mant\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131 bir \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ma dayanmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
iii. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a yanl\u0131\u015f olan olgular\u0131n h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
iv. Somut olay\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli olan ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n
v. Belirli bir hususu ispat etti\u011finde ku\u015fku bulunmayan bir delilin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a keyf\u00ee olarak dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131,<\/p>\n
vi. Maddi olay\u0131n tespitinde aksi ispat edilemeyecek ve savunma yapmay\u0131 anlams\u0131z k\u0131lacak varsay\u0131mlara dayan\u0131lmas\u0131.<\/p>\n
18. Anayasa Mahkemesi ayn\u0131 kararda yarg\u0131laman\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili hususlar\u0131 usule ili\u015fkin bir g\u00fcvenceye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcren durumlar\u0131n yukar\u0131da belirtilenlerle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunlara benzer h\u00e2llerde de Anayasa Mahkemesince bireysel ba\u015fvuru kapsam\u0131nda denetim yap\u0131labilece\u011fini; bununla birlikte belirtilen eksikliklerin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlaline yol a\u00e7abilmesi i\u00e7in bunlar\u0131n ayr\u0131ca yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetini zedeledi\u011finin tespit edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini de ifade etmi\u015ftir (\u0130smet Murtezao\u011flu, \u00a7 40).<\/p>\n
19. Somut olayda dava, ba\u015fvurucunun ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i istihdam\u0131 pozisyonundan yararlanma talebinin reddi i\u015flemine kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130darenin talebi ret gerek\u00e7esi, ba\u015fvurucunun 26\/3\/2012-1\/12\/2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ta\u015feron bir \u015firkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla istihdama ili\u015fkin \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6neliktir. Ba\u015fvurucu ise 2011-2017 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda idare b\u00fcnyesinde ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonu i\u00e7in \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmektedir.<\/p>\n
20. 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda olabilmek i\u00e7in mevzuatta belirtilen idarelerin b\u00fcnyesinde istihdam edilmek, bu istihdam\u0131n personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi kapsam\u0131nda olmas\u0131 ve bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n 4\/12\/2017 tarihi (do\u011fum izni, hastal\u0131k izni, askerlik izni vb. istisna) itibar\u0131yla devam ediyor olmas\u0131 \u00f6n ko\u015ful olarak aranmaktad\u0131r. Ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonunda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fabilmek i\u00e7in ise Usul ve Esaslar\u0131n19. maddesine g\u00f6re Usul ve Esaslar\u0131n 3. maddesinde belirtilen idarelerin ayn\u0131 maddede belirtilen b\u00fct\u00e7elerinden kar\u015f\u0131lanan ve personel \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dayal\u0131 hizmet al\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n \u201cy\u0131l boyunca devam etme \u015fart\u0131\u201d hari\u00e7 di\u011fer t\u00fcm \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan hizmet al\u0131m s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinden; 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla devam edenlerden bu tarih itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar ile 2017 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7inde 4\/12\/2017 tarihinden \u00f6nce sona ermi\u015f olanlarda s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin s\u00fcresinin sona erdi\u011fi tarihte \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f olmak ve bu Usul ve Esaslar\u0131n 5. maddesinde aranan \u015fartlar\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mak gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
21. Dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki belgelerden ba\u015fvurucunun idarenin ihale yolu ile i\u015f verdi\u011fi bir \u015firkette 24\/7\/2013-30\/4\/2017 tarihleri aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daire de ba\u015fvurucunun 30\/4\/2017 tarihinde i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitini yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak gerek\u00e7enin devam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun 375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK’n\u0131n ge\u00e7ici 23. maddesi gere\u011fince 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sebebiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ancak 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u015fart\u0131, s\u00fcrekli i\u015f\u00e7i olarak istihdam taleplerinde aranmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu ise ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonunda istihdam edilmek istemektedir. Bu istihdam \u015fekli i\u00e7in de 4\/12\/2017 tarihi itibar\u0131yla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u015fart\u0131 aranmamaktad\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7 olarak somut olay\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirli olan ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmeyerek kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri hatal\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu durumun ise yarg\u0131laman\u0131n hakkaniyetini zedeledi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti ve yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2) [1. B.], B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
V. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi 1. \u0130dari Dava Dairesine (E.2020\/2753, K.2021\/3572) iletilmek \u00fczere Ankara 18. \u0130dare Mahkemesine (E.2018\/1125, K.2019\/827) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 664,10 TL har\u00e7tan olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 15\/4\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 15\/4\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/13674 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR ERHAN ARSLAN BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/13674) Karar Tarihi: 15\/4\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Mutlu ALAF Ba\u015fvurucu : Erhan ARSLAN I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta olan ba\u015fvurucunun ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i pozisyonunda kadroya ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in idareye yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddi \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131lan davada hakkaniyete uygun yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu G\u0131da, Tar\u0131m ve Hayvanc\u0131l\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Tar\u0131m Reformu Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Arazi Toplula\u015ft\u0131rma Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 emrinde ta\u015feron i\u015f\u00e7i olarak 2011-2017 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu 5\/1\/2018 tarihinde idareye, 27\/6\/1989 tarihli ve 375 say\u0131l\u0131 657 Say\u0131l\u0131 Devlet Memurlar\u0131 Kanunu, 926 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri Personel Kanunu, 2802 Say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu, 2914 Say\u0131l\u0131 Y\u00fcksek\u00f6\u011fretim Personel Kanunu, 5434 Say\u0131l\u0131 T.C. Emekli Sand\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kanunu ile Di\u011fer Baz\u0131 Kanun ve Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamelerde De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131, Devlet Memurlar\u0131 ve Di\u011fer Kamu G\u00f6revlilerine Memuriyet Taban Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve K\u0131dem Ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile Ek Tazminat \u00d6denmesi Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’ye (375 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK) eklenen ge\u00e7ici 23. ve 24. maddelere istinaden ge\u00e7ici i\u015f\u00e7i kadrosuna ge\u00e7mek i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. \u0130dare bu talebi, ba\u015fvurucunun istihdam ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucu, ret i\u015fleminin iptali ve maddi kay\u0131plar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi talebiyle 17\/5\/2018 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-141566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n