{"id":122298,"date":"2025-06-21T16:27:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-21T13:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-06-21T16:27:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-21T13:27:00","slug":"yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n

8. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi
\nKAYYIM : …
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : N\u00fcfus Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n D\u00fczeltilmesi, Babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tespiti
\n\u0130LK DERECE
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 16. Aile Mahkemesi<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda Ankara 16 Aile Hukuk Mahkemesinin 06.11.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/47 Esas, 2018\/146 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olup, bu kez davac\u0131 vekilinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 temyizi \u00fczerine Dairece dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n

K A R A R<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde, vekil edeni Remziye’nin karde\u015fi Nazmiye ile Nazmiye’nin e\u015fi Umut’un n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnen Edanur ile vekil edenin bekarl\u0131k hanesinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fu Emir’in, Remziye ile daval\u0131 …’\u0131n gayr\u0131 resmi birlikteli\u011finden d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Edanur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi ile babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini, \u00e7ocuk Emir y\u00f6n\u00fcnden babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Aile Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, ibraz edilen vekaletnamede babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel yetki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve verilen s\u00fcreye ra\u011fmen eksikli\u011fin ikmal edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf istemi B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince esastan reddedilmi\u015ftir. \u0130stinaf isteminin esastan reddine dair karar davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

1. Dosya muhtevas\u0131na, dava evrak\u0131 ile yarg\u0131lama tutanaklar\u0131 m\u00fcnderecat\u0131na, mevcut deliller Mahkemece takdir edilerek karar verildi\u011fine ve takdirde bir isabetsizlik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bent kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

2. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun g\u00f6revin belirlenmesi ve niteli\u011fi ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 1. maddesinde mahkemelerin g\u00f6revinin ancak kanunla d\u00fczenlenece\u011fi ve g\u00f6reve ili\u015fkin kurallar\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeninden oldu\u011fu belirlendi\u011finden bu husus mahkemelerce yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda kendili\u011finden g\u00f6zetilmesi gerekir.
\nHMK uyar\u0131nca, olaylar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamak taraflara hukuki niteleme hakime aittir.<\/p>\n

\u00d6ncelikle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken husus; davan\u0131n soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi-babal\u0131k veya n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere, soyba\u011f\u0131 birbirinin soyundan gelen ki\u015filer aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiyi ifade etti\u011finden bu kavram i\u00e7erisinde kan ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda hukuki m\u00fcnasebetin de bulunmas\u0131, di\u011fer bir ifadeyle kan ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hukuk d\u00fczeninin arad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ko\u015fullar i\u00e7erisinde olu\u015fmas\u0131 zorunludur. T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 282. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, \u00e7ocuk ile ana aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 do\u011fumla, baba ile aras\u0131ndaki soyba\u011f\u0131 ise ana ile evlilik, tan\u0131ma veya hakim h\u00fckm\u00fcyle kurulur. Soyba\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca evlat edinme yoluyla da kurulur, ayr\u0131ca, k\u0131saca af kanunlar\u0131 olarak nitelendirilen bir evlenme aktine dayanmayan birle\u015fmelerden do\u011fan \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n neseplerinin d\u00fczeltilmesine ili\u015fkin kanunlara g\u00f6re de soyba\u011f\u0131 kurulabilir. (HGK 30.01.2008 g\u00fcn 2008\/2-36-47 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131) \u00c7ocuk ile ana aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 do\u011fumla kendili\u011finden kurulur ve tesisi i\u00e7in herhangi bir h\u00fckme gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, \u00e7ocu\u011fun annesi ile soyba\u011f\u0131 ili\u015fkisinin kurulmas\u0131 de\u011fil, \u00e7ocu\u011fu do\u011furan kad\u0131n\u0131n kim oldu\u011funun tespiti dava konusu edilebilir.<\/p>\n

\u00d6te yandan T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun 36\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re, ki\u015fisel durum, bu ama\u00e7la tutulan resmi sicille belirlenir. Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 39. ve N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanunu’nun 35\/1. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca, kesinle\u015fmi\u015f mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fc olmad\u0131k\u00e7a n\u00fcfus k\u00fct\u00fcklerinin hi\u00e7 bir kayd\u0131 d\u00fczeltilemez ve kay\u0131tlar\u0131n anlam\u0131n\u0131 ve ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgileri de\u011fi\u015ftirecek \u015ferhler konulamaz, ancak olaylar\u0131n aile k\u00fct\u00fcklerine tescili esnas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan madd\u00ee hatalar n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce dayanak belgesine uygun olarak d\u00fczeltilir.<\/p>\n

Kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltilmesi, aile k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne i\u015flenmi\u015f kayd\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi veya de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesidir. N\u00fcfus k\u00fct\u00fcklerindeki do\u011fru olmayan kay\u0131tlar\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi i\u00e7in mahkemeden karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 zorunludur. \u0130\u015fte bu noktada, n\u00fcfus k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde yer alan do\u011fru olmayan kay\u0131tlar, ilgililerince a\u00e7\u0131lacak kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltme davas\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ek durumuna uygun hale getirilebilir ki, bu dava uygulamada n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131 olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lmakta olup zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ve hak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc s\u00fcreye ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesine ili\u015fkin davalarda, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc kan\u0131ta ba\u015fvurulabilir (YHGK, 11.02.1998, 2-87\/77 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131) Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 ile kay\u0131t d\u00fczeltme davas\u0131, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 (hane d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131karmak) bak\u0131m\u0131ndan benzerlik g\u00f6stermekte ise de, i\u00e7erik ve yarg\u0131lama kurallar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan kendi \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddinde, ki\u015fisel duruma ili\u015fkin n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131nda yer alan bilgi do\u011fru olarak meydana gelmi\u015f ve k\u00fct\u00fc\u011fe tescil edilmi\u015ftir. Ancak bu do\u011fru daha sonra soyba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n reddi davas\u0131 ile teknik anlamda bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011fa d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. N\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131nda ise, n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ek durumu yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015ftan yanl\u0131\u015f olarak k\u00fct\u00fc\u011fe ge\u00e7irildi\u011fi s\u00f6z konusudur. (HGK 30.01.2008 g\u00fcn 2008\/2-36-47 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131) N\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin d\u00fczeltme davalar\u0131, 4787 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 4’nc\u00fc maddesi kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olup, aile mahkemelerinin g\u00f6revine girmez. Asliye hukuk mahkemelerinin g\u00f6rev alan\u0131na giren n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davalar\u0131nda, N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanunu’nun 36. maddesi gere\u011fi, n\u00fcfus m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc veya memurunun bulunmas\u0131 ve karar\u0131n onlar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde verilmesi zorunludur.<\/p>\n

Somut olayda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen taleplerden biri de, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’\u0131n … ve … \u00e7ocu\u011fu olarak ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyana dayal\u0131 olu\u015fturulan n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile ger\u00e7ek annesinin davac\u0131 … oldu\u011funun tespiti ile buna uygun olarak n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n

Yukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen a\u00e7\u0131klamalar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; anne ile \u00e7ocuk aras\u0131nda soyba\u011f\u0131 do\u011fum ile kurulaca\u011f\u0131ndan ve …’\u0131n ger\u00e7ek annesinin … olup, … olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ek babas\u0131n\u0131n da … olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin talep bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 beyanla ba\u015ftan beri yanl\u0131\u015f olan sicilin d\u00fczeltilmesi niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fundan, s\u00f6zkonusu talepler bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dava 5490 say\u0131l\u0131 N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanununun 36. maddesi kapsam\u0131na giren n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131d\u0131r. N\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davas\u0131nda resmi sicilin belgeledi\u011fi olgunun do\u011fru olmamas\u0131, ba\u015ftan yanl\u0131\u015f olarak k\u00fct\u00fc\u011fe ge\u00e7irilmesi s\u00f6z konusudur. 5490 say\u0131l\u0131 N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanununun 36. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi davalar\u0131na N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc temsilcisinin kat\u0131l\u0131m\u0131yla asliye hukuk mahkemesinde bak\u0131l\u0131r.
\nYukar\u0131da g\u00f6sterilen a\u00e7\u0131klamalar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda; Mahkemece, …’\u0131n … ve … \u00e7ocu\u011fu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ger\u00e7ek annesinin … oldu\u011fu talepleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Asliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6ndermek \u00fczere g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemesi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin istinaf isteminin esastan reddine dair karar\u0131 kald\u0131r\u0131larak, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nin 373\/1 maddesi uyar\u0131nca KALDIRILMASINA, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n HMK’nin 371. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, dosyan\u0131n \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesine, karardan bir \u00f6rne\u011finin de B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 12.04.2021 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 12.04.2021 tarihli, 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi KAYYIM : … DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : N\u00fcfus Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n D\u00fczeltilmesi, Babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tespiti \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 16. Aile Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda Ankara 16 Aile Hukuk Mahkemesinin 06.11.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/47 Esas, 2018\/146 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olup, bu kez davac\u0131 vekilinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 temyizi \u00fczerine Dairece dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde, vekil edeni Remziye’nin karde\u015fi Nazmiye ile Nazmiye’nin e\u015fi Umut’un n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnen Edanur ile vekil edenin bekarl\u0131k hanesinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fu Emir’in, Remziye ile daval\u0131 …’\u0131n gayr\u0131 resmi birlikteli\u011finden d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Edanur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi ile babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini, \u00e7ocuk Emir y\u00f6n\u00fcnden babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015ftir. Aile Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, ibraz edilen vekaletnamede babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel yetki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve verilen s\u00fcreye ra\u011fmen eksikli\u011fin ikmal edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf istemi B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-122298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi KAYYIM : … DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : N\u00fcfus Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n D\u00fczeltilmesi, Babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tespiti \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 16. Aile Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda Ankara 16 Aile Hukuk Mahkemesinin 06.11.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/47 Esas, 2018\/146 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olup, bu kez davac\u0131 vekilinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 temyizi \u00fczerine Dairece dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde, vekil edeni Remziye’nin karde\u015fi Nazmiye ile Nazmiye’nin e\u015fi Umut’un n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnen Edanur ile vekil edenin bekarl\u0131k hanesinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fu Emir’in, Remziye ile daval\u0131 …’\u0131n gayr\u0131 resmi birlikteli\u011finden d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Edanur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi ile babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini, \u00e7ocuk Emir y\u00f6n\u00fcnden babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015ftir. Aile Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, ibraz edilen vekaletnamede babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel yetki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve verilen s\u00fcreye ra\u011fmen eksikli\u011fin ikmal edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf istemi B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-21T13:27:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-21T13:27:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1362,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-21T13:27:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesi KAYYIM : … DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : N\u00fcfus Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n D\u00fczeltilmesi, Babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n Tespiti \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : Ankara 16. Aile Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen ve yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan davada yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda Ankara 16 Aile Hukuk Mahkemesinin 06.11.2018 tarihli ve 2018\/47 Esas, 2018\/146 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, Mahkeme h\u00fckm\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Ankara B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Hukuk Dairesince istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddine \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olup, bu kez davac\u0131 vekilinin B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 temyizi \u00fczerine Dairece dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: K A R A R Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde, vekil edeni Remziye’nin karde\u015fi Nazmiye ile Nazmiye’nin e\u015fi Umut’un n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcnen Edanur ile vekil edenin bekarl\u0131k hanesinde kay\u0131tl\u0131 \u00e7ocu\u011fu Emir’in, Remziye ile daval\u0131 …’\u0131n gayr\u0131 resmi birlikteli\u011finden d\u00fcnyaya geldi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek; k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck Edanur y\u00f6n\u00fcnden n\u00fcfus kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fczeltilmesi ile babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini, \u00e7ocuk Emir y\u00f6n\u00fcnden babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitini istemi\u015ftir. Aile Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, ibraz edilen vekaletnamede babal\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitine ili\u015fkin \u00f6zel yetki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve verilen s\u00fcreye ra\u011fmen eksikli\u011fin ikmal edilmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n usulden reddine karar verilmi\u015f, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf istemi B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-06-21T13:27:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"7 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-06-21T13:27:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1362,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-21T13:27:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-8-hukuk-dairesinin-2019-5440-e-2021-3370-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 8. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2019\/5440 E., 2021\/3370 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}