{"id":118802,"date":"2025-06-17T21:13:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-17T18:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-06-17T21:13:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-17T18:13:00","slug":"yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n<p>20. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi<br \/>\nSu\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma<br \/>\nH\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet<\/p>\n<p>Dosya incelendi.<\/p>\n<p>GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:<\/p>\n<p>1-San\u0131k &#8230; ve&#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde;<br \/>\nYarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p>a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na; su\u00e7 tarihinin \u201cSan\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in;13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; i\u00e7in; 01\/06\/2015\u201d olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine san\u0131k ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n &#8221; 2015&#8243; olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>b-)H\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00f6nce 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde oldu\u011fundan CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 321. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA; ancak bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan;<\/p>\n<p>a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 tarihinin &#8220;San\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; i\u00e7in; 01\/06\/2015&#8221; olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>b-)TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 ile ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 ve yerine &#8220;san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda, Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08\/10\/2015 tarihli iptal karar\u0131ndan sonra olu\u015fan duruma g\u00f6re, TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin 1 ve 2. f\u0131kralar\u0131 ile 3. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinin uygulanmas\u0131na&#8221;, ibaresinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle h\u00fckmolunan ceza miktar\u0131 ile tutuklu kal\u0131nan s\u00fcre dikkate al\u0131narak san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;nun tahliye talebinin reddine ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>2-San\u0131k &#8230;&#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p>a-) T\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, 04.02.2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda, yap\u0131lan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmde su\u00e7a konu maddenin sat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerin,&#8230;Merkez Camii&#8217;ne uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 1.alternatif yoldan 194.00 metre, 2. Alternatif yoldan 219 metre oldu\u011funun tespit edildi\u011fi gerek\u00e7eli kararda ise su\u00e7a konu yerin ibadethaneye 200 metreden daha yak\u0131n mesafede oldu\u011funun belirtilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7unun i\u015flendi\u011fi yerin camii s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na mutad ula\u015f\u0131m yollar\u0131 (yaya ya da ara\u00e7la) ile mesafesinin iki y\u00fcz metreden yak\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n (ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131n arazisine girmeme veya yol olmayan b\u00f6l\u00fcmden gitmeme \u015fart\u0131yla) kesin olarak belirlendikten sonra sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK\u2019n\u0131n 188\/4-b maddesinin uygulan\u0131p uygulanmayaca\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n<p>b-) H\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00f6nce 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi<\/p>\n<p>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 302\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n<p>3- San\u0131klar &#8230; ve&#8230;hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde;<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n<p>a-) Dosya i\u00e7erisinde mevcut 01.06.2015 tarihli fiziki takip ve ayn\u0131 tarihli &#8230; ile&#8230;&#8217;\u0131n yakalanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutanaklar ile san\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re; olay tarihinde iskele caddesi tekneler civar\u0131nda san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;nin&#8230; isimli teknenin \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunan banklarda oturdu\u011fu, bir s\u00fcre sonra yan\u0131na uyu\u015fturucu madde sat\u0131n almak i\u00e7in &#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n geldikleri, akabinde&#8230;,&#8230; ve &#8230;&#8217;in yan\u0131na san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;in geldi\u011fi, &#8230; ile &#8230;&#8217;in aralar\u0131nda bir\u015feyler konu\u015fmas\u0131 \u00fczerine &#8230; &#8216;in ayr\u0131larak bir yere gitti\u011fi, bir m\u00fcddet sonra bankta oturan&#8230;,&#8230; ve&#8230;&#8217;in yan\u0131na geldi\u011finde &#8230;&#8217;in cebinden \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 gazeteye sar\u0131l\u0131 uyu\u015fturucu maddeyi &#8230;&#8217;ya verdi\u011finin sabit oldu\u011fu; Uyu\u015fturucu madde sat\u0131\u015f\u0131\/temini yap\u0131lan bu yerin &#8230; Camii&#8217;ne mesafesinin 04.02.2016 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporuna g\u00f6re 198 metre olarak belirlendi\u011fi ancak bilirki\u015fi raporunda bu yerin &#8230; g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinden ve &#8230; program\u0131ndan faydalan\u0131larak yakla\u015f\u0131k olarak belirlendi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve yap\u0131lan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmleme sonucu camiye uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 198 metre olarak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc; TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 188. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendine g\u00f6re ise cezada art\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n 200 metreye kadar olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi dikkate al\u0131narak 2 metrelik fark\u0131n hassas bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmleme yap\u0131larak belirlenmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 188\/4-b maddesi ile art\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in mahallinde ke\u015fif yap\u0131larak, fiziki takip tutana\u011f\u0131 ve yakalama tutana\u011f\u0131ndaki veriler g\u00f6zetilerek olay tarihinde &#8230; adl\u0131 tekne \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunan banklardan hangisi yan\u0131nda uyu\u015fturucu madde sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerin kesin olarak tespiti i\u00e7in san\u0131klar&#8230;,&#8230; ve maddeyi alan &#8230; ile bu tutanaklar\u0131 d\u00fczenleyen kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin beyanlar\u0131na ba\u015fvurularak uyu\u015fturucu sat\u0131lan yerin belirlenmesinden sonra &#8230; Camii&#8217;ne uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mutad ula\u015f\u0131m yollar\u0131 ile (yaya olarak y\u00fcr\u00fcme ya da ara\u00e7la) tespit edilmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 188. maddesinin 4. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendi ile art\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n<p>b-) 01\/06\/2015 tarihinde san\u0131k &#8230;&#8217;nin esrar\u0131 san\u0131k &#8230; arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla temin ettirerek kullan\u0131c\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;ya verdi\u011finin ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda para ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131k &#8230; ve&#8230;&#8217;nin beyanlar\u0131 ile de sabit olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 37\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma su\u00e7unu birlikte i\u015fleyen olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi yerine dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015fmeyen yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 39. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131,<\/p>\n<p>c-) H\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00f6nce 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n<p>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 ve san\u0131klar m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu nedenlerle yerinde oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA,<br \/>\n07.02.2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bYarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 17.02.2019 tarihli, 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Su\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma H\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet Dosya incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc: 1-San\u0131k &#8230; ve&#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde; Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak; a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na; su\u00e7 tarihinin \u201cSan\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in;13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; i\u00e7in; 01\/06\/2015\u201d olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine san\u0131k ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n &#8221; 2015&#8243; olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, b-)H\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00f6nce 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi, Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde oldu\u011fundan CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 321. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA; ancak bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan; a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 tarihinin &#8220;San\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-118802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Su\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma H\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet Dosya incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc: 1-San\u0131k &#8230; ve&#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde; Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak; a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na; su\u00e7 tarihinin \u201cSan\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in;13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; i\u00e7in; 01\/06\/2015\u201d olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine san\u0131k ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n &#8221; 2015&#8243; olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, b-)H\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00f6nce 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi, Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde oldu\u011fundan CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 321. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA; ancak bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan; a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 tarihinin &#8220;San\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-17T18:13:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-17T18:13:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1310,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-17T18:13:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Su\u00e7 : Uyu\u015fturucu madde ticareti yapma H\u00fck\u00fcmler : Mahk\u00fbmiyet Dosya incelendi. GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc: 1-San\u0131k &#8230; ve&#8230; hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinde; Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki i\u015flemlerin yasaya uygun olarak yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda g\u00f6sterilip tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eylemin san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdan\u00ee kan\u0131n\u0131n dosya i\u00e7indeki belge ve bilgilerle uyumlu olarak kesin verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, eyleme uyan su\u00e7 tipi ile yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilen d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda do\u011fru bi\u00e7imde belirlendi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak; a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na; su\u00e7 tarihinin \u201cSan\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in;13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &#8230; i\u00e7in; 01\/06\/2015\u201d olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine san\u0131k ayr\u0131m\u0131 yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n &#8221; 2015&#8243; olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131, b-)H\u00fck\u00fcmden \u00f6nce 24.11.2015 tarih ve 29542 say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete&#8217;de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren Anayasa Mahkemesi&#8217;nin 08.10.2015 tarihli 2014\/140 esas ve 2015\/85 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK&#8217;n\u0131n 53. maddesinin baz\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin iptal edilmesi nedeniyle, bu maddenin hatal\u0131 \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131na karar verilmesi, Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafilerinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde oldu\u011fundan CMK&#8217;n\u0131n 321. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA; ancak bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden duru\u015fma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 322. maddesi uyar\u0131nca d\u00fczeltilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan; a-)Gerek\u00e7eli karar ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na su\u00e7 tarihinin &#8220;San\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 13\/07\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230; i\u00e7in; 25\/04\/2015, san\u0131k &#8230;, &#8230; ve &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-06-17T18:13:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"6 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-06-17T18:13:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1310,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-17T18:13:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-20-ceza-dairesinin-2018-1156-e-2019-766-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 20. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 2018\/1156 E., 2019\/766 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118802"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118802\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}