{"id":112944,"date":"2025-06-11T00:12:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-10T21:12:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-06-11T00:12:00","modified_gmt":"2025-06-10T21:12:00","slug":"yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"

T.C.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n

16. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n

2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K.<\/p>\n

“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n

MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130
\nDAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TENK\u0130S<\/p>\n

Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tenkis davas\u0131 sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD\u00dc :<\/p>\n

Davac\u0131 …, 29.7.2007 tarihinde vefat eden murisi babas\u0131 …\u2019nun 1142 ada 31 parselde bulunan 14 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm numaral\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n intifa hakk\u0131 ile 2\/7 oran\u0131ndaki m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 26.11.1997 tarihli d\u00fczenleme \u015feklindeki vasiyetname ile daval\u0131 e\u015fi …\u2019na vasiyet etti\u011fini, vasiyetnamenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarihte daval\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay sahibi miras\u00e7\u0131lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin sakl\u0131 pay kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini, tasarruf nisab\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 7000 TL tenkis alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendisine \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015f, di\u011fer davac\u0131lar …ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle daval\u0131 … hakk\u0131nda tenkis davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar, 7100 TL’nin daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendilerine \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011funu, intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n tenkise tabi olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin Hekimhan \u0130l\u00e7esinde temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekesi bulundu\u011funu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fini belirterek a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda 3902.13 TL’nin dava tarihi olan 10.10.2008 tarihinden itibaren itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131lara verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n

Mahkemece; davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131na toplam 3902.13 TL oran\u0131nda tecav\u00fcz edildi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131larak karar verilmi\u015f ise de mahkemece yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve inceleme h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmak i\u00e7in yeterli bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Mahkemece h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilirken temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 tereke dikkate al\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f, temlike konu terekenin \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihi itibariye de\u011feri tespit edilmemi\u015f, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131 temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekeden tahsil edip etmedikleri hususu ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, sabit tenkis oran\u0131 belirlenmemi\u015f, b\u00f6l\u00fcnmezlik konusunda ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, daval\u0131 tarafa tercih hakk\u0131 hat\u0131rlat\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f, davac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan yasal faiz talep edilmedi\u011fi halde talebin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle tenkis alaca\u011f\u0131na yasal faiz y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Tenkis (indirim) davas\u0131; murisin sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131 zedeleyen \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 veya sa\u011flar aras\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalar\u0131n yasal s\u0131n\u0131ra \u00e7ekilmesini ama\u00e7layan, \u00f6nceye etkili, yenilik do\u011furucu davalardand\u0131r. Tenkis davas\u0131n\u0131n dinlenebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikli ko\u015ful; murisin \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 veya sa\u011flar aras\u0131 bir kazand\u0131rma i\u015flemi ile sakl\u0131 pay sahiplerinin haklar\u0131n\u0131 zedelemi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n zedelendi\u011finden s\u00f6z edilmesi ise kazand\u0131rma konusu tereke ile kazand\u0131rma d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekenin t\u00fcm\u00fc ile bilinmesiyle m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Tereke miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinde b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu mameleki k\u0131ymetler ile iadeye ve tenkise tabi olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 kazand\u0131rmalard\u0131r. Bunlar terekenin aktifini olu\u015fturur. Murisin bor\u00e7lar\u0131, bakmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu ki\u015filerin 3 ayl\u0131k ia\u015fe bedeli, terekenin defterinin tutulmas\u0131, m\u00fch\u00fcrlenmesi, cenaze masraflar\u0131 gibi giderler de pasifidir. Aktiften belirtilen pasif kalemlerin indirilmesi suretiyle net tereke tespit edilir. Tereke bu \u015fekilde tespit edildikten sonra miras\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihteki fiyatlara g\u00f6re de\u011ferlendirilmesi yap\u0131larak parasal olarak miktar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekir. Medeni Kanun’un 564. maddesinde belirlenen sakl\u0131 paya tecav\u00fcz edip etmedi\u011fi bulunan bu rakam \u00fczerinden hesaplan\u0131r. Tasarruf oran\u0131 a\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise tasarrufun niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re icap ederse kazand\u0131rma i\u015fleminde sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131 zedeleme kast\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 objektif ve subjektif unsurlar dikkate al\u0131narak belirlenmelidir. Zira tasarruf oran\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fan her kazand\u0131rmada sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131 zedeleme kast\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z edilemez. Mutlak olarak tenkise tabi tasarruflarda (\u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarruflar veya Medeni Kanunu’nun 565. maddesinin 1, 2 ve 3.bentlerinde g\u00f6sterilenler ) veya sakl\u0131 pay\u0131n ihlal kast\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kesin olarak anla\u015f\u0131lan di\u011ferlerinde \u00f6zellikle muayyen mal hakk\u0131nda tenkis uygulan\u0131rken Medeni Kanunu nun 570. maddesindeki s\u0131ralamaya dikkat etmek daval\u0131 mahfuz hisseli miras\u00e7\u0131lardan ise ayn\u0131 kanunun 561. maddesinde yer alan mahfuz hissesinden fazla olarak al\u0131nanla sorumluluk ilkesini g\u00f6zetmek, dava konusu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na bak\u0131lmayarak \u00f6nce \u00f6l\u00fcme ba\u011fl\u0131 tasarruflarla davac\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay\u0131n\u0131 tamamlamak, sonra sa\u011flar aras\u0131 tasarruflar\u0131 dikkate almak gerekir. Bu i\u015flem s\u0131ras\u0131nda dava edilmeyen ki\u015fi ve tasarruflar\u0131n tenkisi gerekece\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131karsa davac\u0131n\u0131n onlardaki hakk\u0131 dava etmemesinin daval\u0131y\u0131 etkilemeyece\u011fi ve birden \u00e7ok ki\u015fiye yap\u0131lan teberru tenkise tabi olursa 563. maddede yer alan, al\u0131lanla m\u00fctenasip sorumluluk kural\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmelidir. Daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan tasarrufun tenkisine s\u0131ra geldi\u011fi taktirde tasarrufun t\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn de\u011feri ile daval\u0131ya yap\u0131lan fazla teberru aras\u0131nda kurulan oranda (sabit tenkis oran\u0131) tasarrufa konu mal\u0131n payla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmayaca\u011f\u0131 (MK.565) ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu ara\u015ft\u0131rma sonunda tasarrufa konu mal sabit tenkis oran\u0131nda b\u00f6l\u00fcnebilirse bu k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm halinde taraflar ad\u0131na tesciline karar verilmelidir. Tasarrufa konu mal\u0131n sabit tenkis oran\u0131nda b\u00f6l\u00fcnmezli\u011fi ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde s\u00f6z\u00fc ge\u00e7en 564. maddedeki tercih hakk\u0131 g\u00fcndeme gelecektir. B\u00f6yle bir durum ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmadan daval\u0131n\u0131n tercih hakk\u0131 do\u011fmadan daval\u0131n\u0131n tercihinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olamaz. Daha \u00f6nce bir tercihten s\u00f6z edilmi\u015fse sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz. O halde mahkemece yukar\u0131da belirtilen ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmal\u0131, has\u0131l olacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmelidir. Belirtilen y\u00f6nler g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilerek yaz\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde karar verilmesi isabetsiz olup, daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden tarafa iadesine, 03.07.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n

\u200bYarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 03.07.2012 tarihli, 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n

Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TENK\u0130S Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tenkis davas\u0131 sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD\u00dc : Davac\u0131 …, 29.7.2007 tarihinde vefat eden murisi babas\u0131 …\u2019nun 1142 ada 31 parselde bulunan 14 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm numaral\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n intifa hakk\u0131 ile 2\/7 oran\u0131ndaki m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 26.11.1997 tarihli d\u00fczenleme \u015feklindeki vasiyetname ile daval\u0131 e\u015fi …\u2019na vasiyet etti\u011fini, vasiyetnamenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarihte daval\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay sahibi miras\u00e7\u0131lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin sakl\u0131 pay kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini, tasarruf nisab\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 7000 TL tenkis alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendisine \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015f, di\u011fer davac\u0131lar …ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle daval\u0131 … hakk\u0131nda tenkis davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar, 7100 TL’nin daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendilerine \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011funu, intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n tenkise tabi olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin Hekimhan \u0130l\u00e7esinde temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekesi bulundu\u011funu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fini belirterek a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda 3902.13 TL’nin dava tarihi olan 10.10.2008 tarihinden itibaren itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131lara verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece; davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131na toplam 3902.13 TL oran\u0131nda tecav\u00fcz edildi\u011fi …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-112944","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"uk_UA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TENK\u0130S Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tenkis davas\u0131 sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD\u00dc : Davac\u0131 …, 29.7.2007 tarihinde vefat eden murisi babas\u0131 …\u2019nun 1142 ada 31 parselde bulunan 14 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm numaral\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n intifa hakk\u0131 ile 2\/7 oran\u0131ndaki m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 26.11.1997 tarihli d\u00fczenleme \u015feklindeki vasiyetname ile daval\u0131 e\u015fi …\u2019na vasiyet etti\u011fini, vasiyetnamenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarihte daval\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay sahibi miras\u00e7\u0131lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin sakl\u0131 pay kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini, tasarruf nisab\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 7000 TL tenkis alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendisine \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015f, di\u011fer davac\u0131lar …ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle daval\u0131 … hakk\u0131nda tenkis davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar, 7100 TL’nin daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendilerine \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011funu, intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n tenkise tabi olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin Hekimhan \u0130l\u00e7esinde temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekesi bulundu\u011funu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fini belirterek a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda 3902.13 TL’nin dava tarihi olan 10.10.2008 tarihinden itibaren itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131lara verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece; davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131na toplam 3902.13 TL oran\u0131nda tecav\u00fcz edildi\u011fi …\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-10T21:12:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-10T21:12:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1036,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-06-10T21:12:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"uk\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"uk\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"uk_UA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 : ASL\u0130YE HUKUK MAHKEMES\u0130 DAVA T\u00dcR\u00dc : TENK\u0130S Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen tenkis davas\u0131 sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi istenilmekle; temyiz iste\u011finin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131, inceleme raporu ve dosyadaki belgeler okundu, GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcLD\u00dc : Davac\u0131 …, 29.7.2007 tarihinde vefat eden murisi babas\u0131 …\u2019nun 1142 ada 31 parselde bulunan 14 ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z b\u00f6l\u00fcm numaral\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n intifa hakk\u0131 ile 2\/7 oran\u0131ndaki m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131 26.11.1997 tarihli d\u00fczenleme \u015feklindeki vasiyetname ile daval\u0131 e\u015fi …\u2019na vasiyet etti\u011fini, vasiyetnamenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi tarihte daval\u0131n\u0131n sakl\u0131 pay sahibi miras\u00e7\u0131lardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin sakl\u0131 pay kurallar\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fini, tasarruf nisab\u0131n\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek 7000 TL tenkis alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendisine \u00f6denmesini talep etmi\u015f, di\u011fer davac\u0131lar …ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7elerle daval\u0131 … hakk\u0131nda tenkis davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flar, 7100 TL’nin daval\u0131dan tahsili ile kendilerine \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Daval\u0131 zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin doldu\u011funu, intifa hakk\u0131n\u0131n tenkise tabi olmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, murisin Hekimhan \u0130l\u00e7esinde temlik d\u0131\u015f\u0131 terekesi bulundu\u011funu, davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilmedi\u011fini belirterek a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda 3902.13 TL’nin dava tarihi olan 10.10.2008 tarihinden itibaren itibaren i\u015fleyecek yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131lara verilmesine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. Mahkemece; davac\u0131lar\u0131n sakl\u0131 paylar\u0131na toplam 3902.13 TL oran\u0131nda tecav\u00fcz edildi\u011fi …","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-06-10T21:12:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u0431\u043b. \u0447\u0430\u0441 \u0447\u0438\u0442\u0430\u043d\u043d\u044f":"5 \u0445\u0432\u0438\u043b\u0438\u043d"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-06-10T21:12:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1036,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-10T21:12:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"uk","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-16-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-4965-e-2012-5895-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 16. Hukuk Dairesi’nin 2012\/4965 E., 2012\/5895 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"uk"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"uk","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112944","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=112944"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/112944\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=112944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=112944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=112944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}