T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
R. \u00d6. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/24623)<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 26\/2\/2025<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Hasan \u00d6nder SULU<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Gaziantep Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 13\/2\/2018 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve 19\/2\/2018 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan d\u00fczenledi\u011fi 27\/2\/2017 tarihli iddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 Gaziantep 7. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
4. Mahkeme 29\/3\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan neticeten 4 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. S\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcm, ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi ile 17\/9\/2018 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu 24\/10\/2019 tarihinde Mahkemeye ba\u015fvurarak 17\/10\/2019 tarihli ve 7188 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu ve Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun gere\u011fince temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 24\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Temyiz incelemesini yapan Yarg\u0131tay 16. Ceza Dairesi 29\/6\/2021 tarihinde talebin esastan reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f ve ba\u015fvurucu 27\/10\/2021 tarihinde Gaziantep H Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumu M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne (kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumu) yerle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 16\/11\/2021 tarihli m\u00fcddetnameye g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihi 1\/7\/2023, hak ederek tahliye tarihi ise 14\/8\/2024’t\u00fcr. M\u00fcddetnamede infaz t\u00fcr\u00fc olarak 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu’nun 17. maddesi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu 25\/11\/2021 tarihinde kapal\u0131 ceza kurumu m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talepli dilek\u00e7e sunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu talebi \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma i\u00e7in gerekli s\u00fcre ko\u015fulunu kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedilmi\u015ftir. Ret karar\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc Propagandas\u0131 Yapmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc oldu\u011fu,A\u00e7\u0131k Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131na Ayr\u0131lma Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin 6\/2-\u00e7 maddesindeki ‘Ter\u00f6r ve \u00f6rg\u00fctl\u00fc su\u00e7lardan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc olup, mensup olduklar\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131 idare ve g\u00f6zlem kurulu karar\u0131yla tespit edilenlerin ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihine bir y\u0131ldan az s\u00fcre kalmas\u0131’ h\u00fckm\u00fcne g\u00f6re karar tarihi itibariyle ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihine bir y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcre kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan A\u00e7\u0131k Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131na ayr\u0131lma \u015fartlar\u0131na ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, Ad\u0131 ge\u00e7enin a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebinin reddine [karar verildi.]”<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, bu karara kar\u015f\u0131 Gaziantep 2. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (H\u00e2kimlik) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu 1\/12\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7esinde \u00f6zetle;<\/p>\n
i. 2\/9\/2012 tarihli ve 28399 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan A\u00e7\u0131k Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna Ayr\u0131lma Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin (Y\u00f6netmelik) 6. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendi uyar\u0131nca kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irmesi gereken s\u00fcreyi doldurdu\u011funu,<\/p>\n
ii. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan ceza almamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen idare ve g\u00f6zlem kurulunun hatal\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmesiyle Y\u00f6netmelik’in 6. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendi gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek talebinin reddedildi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
iii. S\u00f6z konusu ret karar\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 6. Ceza Dairesinin 18\/10\/2018 tarihli ve E.2016\/3842, K.2018\/6288 ve Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesinin E.2017\/3312,K.2019\/2376 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131 ile ortaya konulan i\u00e7tihada ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
11. H\u00e2kimlik 29\/12\/2021 tarihinde ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihine bir y\u0131ldan daha uzun bir s\u00fcre kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“… ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapmak su\u00e7undan h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fi sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair idare ve g\u00f6zlem kurulu karar\u0131na gerek bulunmadan \u015fartla tahliyesine 1 y\u0131l kala a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131l\u0131p ayn\u0131 s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde denetimli serbestlikten faydalanabilece\u011finden, Yarg\u0131tay 1.Ceza Dairesinin 13\/05\/2019 tarih 2018\/4760 esas 2019\/2705 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 da bu y\u00f6nde oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihinin Gaziantep CBS’nca 16\/11\/2021 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen g\u00fcncel m\u00fcddetnamede 1\/7\/2023 tarihi oldu\u011fu, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmesine \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulunun karar tarihi(29\/11\/2021)itibariyle bir y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcre kald\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn A\u00e7\u0131k Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131na ayr\u0131lma \u015fartlar\u0131na haiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 29\/11\/2021 tarih 2021\/3731 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131larak itiraz\u0131n reddine dair a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucunun H\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz Gaziantep 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi (itiraz mercii) taraf\u0131ndan 8\/2\/2022 tarihinde kesin olarak reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucu, itiraz\u0131n reddi karar\u0131n\u0131 15\/2\/2022 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 24\/2\/2022 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
14. Komisyon taraf\u0131ndan bu kararda incelenen \u015fik\u00e2yet haricindeki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, bu \u015fik\u00e2yet y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
15. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurucu, ba\u015fvuru formunda \u00f6zetle;<\/p>\n
i. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edildi\u011fini, \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma ko\u015fullar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan hakk\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu olarak de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
ii. Yarg\u0131sal mercilerin a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki talebini denetimli serbestlik tedbirinden yararlanma talebi olarak de\u011ferlendirdiklerini ve bu suretle a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebine ili\u015fkin bir inceleme yapmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
iii. A\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gereken t\u00fcm \u015fartlar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine ra\u011fmen hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 \u015fekilde kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda tutuldu\u011funu,<\/p>\n
iv. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ve itiraz mercii kararlar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
17. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin incelemenin somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak ve ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7unun Y\u00f6netmelik’in 5. ve 6. maddelerinde belirtilen istisnai su\u00e7lardan olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilerek yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, yasal ko\u015fullar\u0131 olu\u015ftu\u011fu halde a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak reddedildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fik\u00e2yetinin denetimli serbestlik tedbirinden yararlanma ile ilgili olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k bir bi\u00e7imde ortaya koymu\u015ftur. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuru, a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebinin reddi ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
19. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda herkesin ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu ilke olarak konduktan sonra ikinci ve \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131nda \u015fekil ve \u015fartlar\u0131 kanunda g\u00f6sterilmek kayd\u0131yla ki\u015filerin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131labilece\u011fi durumlar s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015finin \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve g\u00fcvenlik hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 ancak Anayasa’n\u0131n an\u0131lan maddesi kapsam\u0131nda belirlenen durumlardan herhangi birinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2linde s\u00f6z konusu olabilir (Murat Narman, B. No: 2012\/1137, 2\/7\/2013, \u00a7 42).<\/p>\n
20. Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ilk istisnas\u0131 “mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi” olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda yarg\u0131 organlar\u0131nca verilecek mahk\u00fbmiyet kararlar\u0131n\u0131n sonucu olarak hapis cezas\u0131 veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin uygulanmas\u0131 ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlali kabul edilmeyecektir. Di\u011fer taraftan su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesine ba\u011fl\u0131 tutma kapsam\u0131nda olan durumdan farkl\u0131 olarak an\u0131lan istisna bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak tutmay\u0131 ifade etmektedir (Tahir Canan (2), B. No: 2013\/839, 5\/11\/2014, \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
21. Bununla birlikte Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019nin 5. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi kapsam\u0131na mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yerine getirilmesi h\u00e2llerinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckten yoksun b\u0131rakma h\u00e2lleri d\u00e2hil ise de an\u0131lan kurallar, mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fil tutman\u0131n hukuka uygun olmas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu g\u00fcvence kapsam\u0131nda, ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckmedilen hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n yerindeli\u011fi veya orant\u0131l\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelemeye tabi tutulamayacakt\u0131r (G\u00fcnay Okan, B. No: 2013\/8114, 17\/9\/2014, \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
22. Bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131n\u0131n infaz\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesi a\u00e7\u0131k bir h\u00fck\u00fcm i\u00e7ermemektedir. Ancak Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin amac\u0131 ki\u015fileri keyf\u00ee bir \u015fekilde h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmaya kar\u015f\u0131 korumak olup maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen istisnai h\u00e2llerde ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyetine getirilecek s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar\u0131n da maddenin amac\u0131na uygun olmas\u0131 gerekir (Abdullah \u00dcnal, B. No: 2012\/1094, 7\/3\/2014, \u00a7 38). Bir kimsenin mahkemelerce verilmi\u015f h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 cezalar\u0131n ve g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin yerine getirilmesi kapsam\u0131nda h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylenebilmesi i\u00e7in her \u015feyden \u00f6nce h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirinin bir mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan verilmesi, ikinci olarak yerine getirilecek karar\u0131n h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerine ili\u015fkin olmas\u0131 gerekir. Ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbiri i\u00e7ermeyen bir karara dayan\u0131larak bir kimsenin h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Son olarak h\u00fcrriyetten yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lman\u0131n mahkemece verilen h\u00fcrriyeti k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 ceza veya g\u00fcvenlik tedbirinin kapsam\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmamas\u0131 gerekir (Ercan Bucak (2), B. No: 2014\/11651, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7 40; \u015eaban Dal, B. No: 2014\/2891, 16\/2\/2017 \u00a7 32; \u00c7.\u00d6. [GK], B. No: 2014\/5927, 19\/7\/2018 \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
23. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin, ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda kalaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreyi do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 olarak etkileyen durumlar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir (\u0130brahim Uysal, B. No: 2014\/1711, 23\/7\/2014, \u00a7 26). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ceza infaz kurumunda kalaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreyi do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 olarak etkilemeyen, yaln\u0131zca cezan\u0131n infaz usul\u00fcn\u00fc\/rejimini belirleyen uygulamalar\u0131n ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale olu\u015fturdu\u011fundan bahsedilemez (hukuka uygun olarak ceza infaz kurumunda tutulan ki\u015filerin m\u00fc\u015fahede odas\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 veya h\u00fccre hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi kesin h\u00fck\u00fcmle s\u0131n\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ca bir m\u00fcdahale olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Ahmet Yeter, B. No: 2014\/5100, 16\/2\/2017, \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
24. Somut olayda \u0130dari ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu ile \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi, ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine esas te\u015fkil eden ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7unu, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili merciler bu de\u011ferlendirme sonras\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik’in 6. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendi uyar\u0131nca ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihine bir y\u0131ldan daha uzun bir s\u00fcre bulunan ba\u015fvurucunun a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebini gerekli s\u00fcre ko\u015fulunu sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle reddetmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu ret kararlar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi olarak kabul edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin herhangi bir ifadeye yer verilmemi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte an\u0131lan merciler ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fcne konu su\u00e7u, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u olarak kabul etmek suretiyle kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilmesi gereken s\u00fcreye ili\u015fkin bir belirlemede bulunmu\u015ftur. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2. maddesine g\u00f6re ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne mensup olmasa dahi \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na su\u00e7 i\u015fleyenler de ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lusu say\u0131l\u0131r. Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 su\u00e7u 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 7. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Yine ayn\u0131 Kanun maddesinde ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7u, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmamakla birlikte \u00f6rg\u00fct ad\u0131na i\u015flenebilecek su\u00e7lar aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle yarg\u0131sal mercilerin ba\u015fvurucunun mahk\u00fbmiyetine esas su\u00e7un, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki de\u011ferlendirmelerinin keyf\u00ee ve temelsiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyesi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek Y\u00f6netmelik’in 6. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendi gere\u011fince \u00f6rg\u00fctten ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu karar\u0131na gerek bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Fakat H\u00e2kimlik\u00e7e ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 su\u00e7u ter\u00f6r su\u00e7u olarak kabul edildi\u011fi i\u00e7in Y\u00f6netmelik’in 6. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (\u00e7) bendi gere\u011fince ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye bir y\u0131ldan az s\u00fcre kal\u0131nmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa ayr\u0131lman\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilebilece\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. H\u00e2kimli\u011fin de tespit etti\u011fi \u00fczere ba\u015fvurucu, bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulundu\u011fu tarih itibar\u0131yla ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye bir y\u0131ldan az s\u00fcre kalma \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Ayr\u0131ca, hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n infaz \u015fekline ili\u015fkin olarak ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131, h\u00e2lihaz\u0131rda hukuka uygun olarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015f bir mahk\u00fbmiyet karar\u0131na istinaden tutulmakta olan ba\u015fvurucunun ceza infaz kurumunda kalaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreyi do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 olarak etkilememektedir. Ki\u015finin kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumundan a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ge\u00e7mesi tutma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi ile ilgili bir mesele olupbu durum ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndad\u0131r. Ki\u015finin kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumundan a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ge\u00e7ememesi ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ca bir m\u00fcdahale olu\u015fturmaz. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n kapal\u0131 ceza infaz kurumu yerine a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumunda yerine getirilmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ihlal iddias\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrebilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. Ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n konu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 26\/2\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 26\/2\/2025 tarihli ve 2022\/24623 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR R. \u00d6. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/24623) Karar Tarihi: 26\/2\/2025 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM KARAR Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u0130rfan F\u0130DAN Muhterem \u0130NCE Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Vekili : Av. Hasan \u00d6nder SULU I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ayr\u0131lma talebinin reddedilmesi nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu, Gaziantep Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 13\/2\/2018 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f ve 19\/2\/2018 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda an\u0131lan su\u00e7tan d\u00fczenledi\u011fi 27\/2\/2017 tarihli iddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 Gaziantep 7. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. 4. Mahkeme 29\/3\/2018 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc propagandas\u0131 yapma su\u00e7undan neticeten 4 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar vermi\u015ftir. 5. S\u00f6z konusu h\u00fck\u00fcm, ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf kanun yolu ba\u015fvurusunun esastan reddi ile 17\/9\/2018 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. 6. Ba\u015fvurucu 24\/10\/2019 tarihinde Mahkemeye ba\u015fvurarak 17\/10\/2019 tarihli ve 7188 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu ve Baz\u0131 Kanunlarda De\u011fi\u015fiklik Yap\u0131lmas\u0131na Dair Kanun gere\u011fince temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme 24\/10\/2019 tarihli ek karar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki h\u00fckm\u00fcn infaz\u0131n\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 7. Temyiz incelemesini yapan Yarg\u0131tay 16. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-105079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n