{"id":93553,"date":"2025-05-21T11:07:00","date_gmt":"2025-05-21T08:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-05-21T11:07:00","modified_gmt":"2025-05-21T08:07:00","slug":"yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n<p>17. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131 &#8230; vekilince istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen 07.05.2019 Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili Av. &#8230; geldi. Davac\u0131lar ile di\u011fer daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan gelen olmad\u0131. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve haz\u0131r bulunan daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili dinlendikten sonra vaktin darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u015fka g\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>-K A R A R-<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131lar vekili; daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu saman y\u00fckl\u00fc kamyonun kasas\u0131ndaki saman y\u00fckleri \u00fczerinde bulunan muris &#8230;&#8217;nin seyir esnas\u0131nda yol \u00fczerinde bulunan telefon kablolar\u0131na tak\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yere d\u00fc\u015ferek \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, deste\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile onun anne ve babas\u0131 ile karde\u015fleri, ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131lar\u0131n deste\u011finden yoksun kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p deste\u011fin anne-babas\u0131 i\u00e7in 3.000,00&#8217;er, deste\u011fin ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in 2.000,00 TL, deste\u011fin karde\u015fleri i\u00e7in 250,00&#8217;\u015fer TL destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 ile 500,00 TL cenaze giderinin, toplam 240.000,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talebini art\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br \/>\nDaval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece, toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile deste\u011fin babas\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 51.305,84 TL, deste\u011fin annesi &#8230; i\u00e7in 48.506,74 TL, ni\u015fanl\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 106.450,67 TL destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 ile deste\u011fin anne-babas\u0131 i\u00e7in 5.000,00&#8217;er TL, karde\u015fleri i\u00e7in 1.500,00&#8217;er TL, ni\u015fanl\u0131 i\u00e7in 1.000,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 &#8230;. vekilince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>1-Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 &#8230;. vekilinin a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>2-Dava, trafik kazas\u0131 sonucu olu\u015fan \u00f6l\u00fcm nedeniyle, \u00f6lenin yak\u0131n\u0131n\u0131n, 6098 say\u0131l\u0131 TBK&#8217;nun 53\/3. (818 say\u0131l\u0131 Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu&#8217;nun 45\/2.) maddesi gere\u011fi destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 istemine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 taraf, davaya konu kazada \u00f6len &#8230; &#8216;nin ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;nin \u00f6lenin deste\u011finden yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ile tazminat istemli davay\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f; mahkemece de, \u00f6lenin davac\u0131\/ni\u015fanl\u0131ya destek oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek davac\u0131n\u0131n bakiye \u00f6mr\u00fc boyunca tazminat hesab\u0131 yap\u0131larak davac\u0131 lehine tazminata karar vermi\u015ftir.<br \/>\nDestekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131n\u0131n konusu, deste\u011fin yitirilmesi nedeniyle yoksun kal\u0131nan zarard\u0131r. Buradaki ama\u00e7, destekten yoksun kalanlar\u0131n, deste\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden \u00f6nceki ya\u015famlar\u0131nda sahip olduklar\u0131 sosyal ve ekonomik durumlar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Olaydan sonraki d\u00f6nemde de, destek olmasa bile, onun zaman\u0131ndaki gibi ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde ya\u015fayabilmeleri i\u00e7in muhta\u00e7 olduklar\u0131 paran\u0131n \u00f6dettirilmesidir. Yani, haks\u0131z bir eylem sonucu deste\u011fini yitiren kimse, TBK&#8217;nun 53. maddesine dayanarak u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zarar\u0131n \u00f6detilmesini isteyebilir.<\/p>\n<p>Destek kavram\u0131, ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f veya ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi umulan bir bak\u0131m ili\u015fkisini g\u00f6sterir. Eylemli ve d\u00fczenli olarak bir kimsenin ge\u00e7imini k\u0131smen veya tamamen sa\u011flayacak bi\u00e7imde ona yard\u0131m eden veya olaylar\u0131n ola\u011fan ak\u0131\u015f\u0131na g\u00f6re e\u011fer \u00f6l\u00fcm ger\u00e7ek1e\u015fmeseydi az veya \u00e7ok yak\u0131n bir gelecekte de bu yard\u0131m\u0131 sa\u011flayacak olan kimse destek say\u0131l\u0131r. Bu manada, bir ba\u015fka ki\u015fiye fiilen bakan, onu ge\u00e7indiren veya ileride bakma, ge\u00e7indirme ihtimali bulunan ki\u015fi, destektir. \u0130lk durumda eylemli destek, ikinci durumda ise varsay\u0131msal (farazi) destek kavram\u0131 s\u00f6z konusudur. \u0130fade olunan bu hususlar, gerek \u00f6\u011fretide gerekse Yarg\u0131tay uygulamalar\u0131nda kabul edilmi\u015f olup, destek kavram\u0131n\u0131n sadece mali olarak yard\u0131m\u0131 ifade etmedi\u011fi, bak\u0131m ve hizmet etmek suretiyle sa\u011flanacak katk\u0131y\u0131 da kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 genel olarak kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Somut olayda; \u00f6lenin ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in \u00f6lenden fiili olarak destek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilen davac\u0131 &#8230; ile kazada \u00f6len Mehmet \u00c7ift\u00e7i aras\u0131nda desteklik ili\u015fkisinin bulundu\u011fu kabul edilmi\u015f ise de ne davac\u0131 &#8230; ile deste\u011fin ni\u015fanl\u0131 oldu\u011fu nede davac\u0131 &#8230; ile \u00f6len aras\u0131nda fiili desteklik ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011fu da ispatlanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<br \/>\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan hukuki ve maddi vak\u0131alar kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkemece; davac\u0131 &#8230; y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n reddi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (1) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 &#8230;. vekilinin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, (2) nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131 &#8230;. vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn daval\u0131 &#8230; yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, 2.037,00 TL vekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131lardan al\u0131narak duru\u015fmada vekille temsil olunan daval\u0131 &#8230;.&#8217;ye verilmesine, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden daval\u0131 &#8230;.&#8217;ye geri verilmesine 09\/05\/2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay <\/p>\n<p>(Kapat\u0131lan)17. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2011\/11129 E., 2012\/12618 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>MAHKEMES\u0130 :Ticaret Mahkemesi<\/p>\n<p>Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda; kararda yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenlerden dolay\u0131 davan\u0131n reddine dair verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>-K A R A R-<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 vekili, daval\u0131n\u0131n trafik sigortac\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu arac\u0131n neden oldu\u011fu kaza sonucunda m\u00fcvekkilinin deste\u011finin hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek 1.000,00 TL destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 sigorta \u015firketi vekili davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemece iddia, savunma ve toplanan kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 ni\u015fanl\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcteveffan\u0131n deste\u011finden yoksun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kan\u0131tlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Dosya i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen t\u00fcm temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve yasaya uygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da d\u00f6k\u00fcm\u00fc yaz\u0131l\u0131 2,75 TL kalan onama harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden davac\u0131dan al\u0131nmas\u0131na 15.11.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bYarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 09\/05\/2019 tarihli, 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile 15.11.2012 tarihli, 2011\/11129 E., 2012\/12618 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131 &#8230; vekilince istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen 07.05.2019 Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili Av. &#8230; geldi. Davac\u0131lar ile di\u011fer daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan gelen olmad\u0131. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve haz\u0131r bulunan daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili dinlendikten sonra vaktin darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u015fka g\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: -K A R A R- Davac\u0131lar vekili; daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu saman y\u00fckl\u00fc kamyonun kasas\u0131ndaki saman y\u00fckleri \u00fczerinde bulunan muris &#8230;&#8217;nin seyir esnas\u0131nda yol \u00fczerinde bulunan telefon kablolar\u0131na tak\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yere d\u00fc\u015ferek \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, deste\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile onun anne ve babas\u0131 ile karde\u015fleri, ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131lar\u0131n deste\u011finden yoksun kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p deste\u011fin anne-babas\u0131 i\u00e7in 3.000,00&#8217;er, deste\u011fin ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in 2.000,00 TL, deste\u011fin karde\u015fleri i\u00e7in 250,00&#8217;\u015fer TL destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 ile 500,00 TL cenaze giderinin, toplam 240.000,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talebini art\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Mahkemece, toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile deste\u011fin babas\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 51.305,84 TL, deste\u011fin annesi &#8230; i\u00e7in 48.506,74 TL, ni\u015fanl\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 106.450,67 &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93553","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131 &#8230; vekilince istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen 07.05.2019 Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili Av. &#8230; geldi. Davac\u0131lar ile di\u011fer daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan gelen olmad\u0131. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve haz\u0131r bulunan daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili dinlendikten sonra vaktin darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u015fka g\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: -K A R A R- Davac\u0131lar vekili; daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu saman y\u00fckl\u00fc kamyonun kasas\u0131ndaki saman y\u00fckleri \u00fczerinde bulunan muris &#8230;&#8217;nin seyir esnas\u0131nda yol \u00fczerinde bulunan telefon kablolar\u0131na tak\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yere d\u00fc\u015ferek \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, deste\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile onun anne ve babas\u0131 ile karde\u015fleri, ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131lar\u0131n deste\u011finden yoksun kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p deste\u011fin anne-babas\u0131 i\u00e7in 3.000,00&#8217;er, deste\u011fin ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in 2.000,00 TL, deste\u011fin karde\u015fleri i\u00e7in 250,00&#8217;\u015fer TL destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 ile 500,00 TL cenaze giderinin, toplam 240.000,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talebini art\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Mahkemece, toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile deste\u011fin babas\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 51.305,84 TL, deste\u011fin annesi &#8230; i\u00e7in 48.506,74 TL, ni\u015fanl\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 106.450,67 &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-21T08:07:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-21T08:07:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":1131,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-21T08:07:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; MAHKEMES\u0130 :Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak temyizen tetkiki daval\u0131 &#8230; vekilince istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen 07.05.2019 Sal\u0131 g\u00fcn\u00fc daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili Av. &#8230; geldi. Davac\u0131lar ile di\u011fer daval\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan gelen olmad\u0131. Temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve haz\u0131r bulunan daval\u0131 &#8230; vekili dinlendikten sonra vaktin darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 i\u015fin incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ba\u015fka g\u00fcne b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: -K A R A R- Davac\u0131lar vekili; daval\u0131 &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu saman y\u00fckl\u00fc kamyonun kasas\u0131ndaki saman y\u00fckleri \u00fczerinde bulunan muris &#8230;&#8217;nin seyir esnas\u0131nda yol \u00fczerinde bulunan telefon kablolar\u0131na tak\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yere d\u00fc\u015ferek \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, deste\u011fin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile onun anne ve babas\u0131 ile karde\u015fleri, ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 olan davac\u0131lar\u0131n deste\u011finden yoksun kald\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klay\u0131p deste\u011fin anne-babas\u0131 i\u00e7in 3.000,00&#8217;er, deste\u011fin ni\u015fanl\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7in 2.000,00 TL, deste\u011fin karde\u015fleri i\u00e7in 250,00&#8217;\u015fer TL destekten yoksun kalma tazminat\u0131 ile 500,00 TL cenaze giderinin, toplam 240.000,00 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f, \u0131slah dilek\u00e7esi ile talebini art\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131lar davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015flerdir. Mahkemece, toplanan delillere g\u00f6re; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc ile deste\u011fin babas\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 51.305,84 TL, deste\u011fin annesi &#8230; i\u00e7in 48.506,74 TL, ni\u015fanl\u0131 &#8230; i\u00e7in 106.450,67 &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-05-21T08:07:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"6 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-05-21T08:07:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":1131,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-21T08:07:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-17-hukuk-dairesinin-2016-15154-e-2019-5802-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 17. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2016\/15154 E., 2019\/5802 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/de\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93553\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}