T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
3. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2016\/7410 E., 2017\/17097 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u0130LE MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki e\u015fya alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraflarca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Y A R G I T A Y\u00a0 \u00a0K A R A R I<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131; daval\u0131 ile … 5. Aile Mahkemesinin 2012\/908E.-2013\/813K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile bo\u015fand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, evlenirken \u00f6nce …’da daha sonra …’da d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn merasimi yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu merasimlerde bir tak\u0131m ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 ve nakit paran\u0131n tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sonra daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131narak daval\u0131n\u0131n bekarl\u0131k d\u00f6nemindeki bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demede kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra da geri verilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, dava konusu alt\u0131nlar\u0131n aynen iadesi yada \u015fimdilik 1000 TL sinin yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f daha sonra taleplerini \u0131slanh ederek 36.261,16 TL’ye artt\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131; taraflar\u0131n tayin sebebi ile d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u00f6ncesi nikah k\u0131yd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra … ve … da iki ayr\u0131 d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yaparak birlikte ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yedi ay \u00f6nce hekim olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, birikim yaparak bor\u00e7suz olarak evlendi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n para ve alt\u0131nlar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 kendi \u015fahsi harcamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 da borsada kaybetti\u011fini beyan ederek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece; dosyaya sunulan deliller, talep edilen alt\u0131n miktar\u0131 ve geline tak\u0131lan tak\u0131lar i\u00e7in davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne bir adet 18 ayar Arpa\u015f marka set (gerdanl\u0131k, bilezik ve k\u00fcpeden olu\u015fan) yada bedeli 2525,25 TL, 10 Adet 22 ayar aynal\u0131 \u00e7ember modelli alt\u0131n bilezik yada bedeli 1 tanesi 666,80 TL den 10 adedi olan toplam 6.668 TL, 5 adet 22 ayar aynal\u0131 \u00e7ember modelli alt\u0131n bilezik yada 1 tanesi 833,80 TL den 5 adedi toplam 3334 TL, 5 adet 22 ayar aynal\u0131 \u00e7ember modelli alt\u0131n bilezik yada 1 tanesi 666,80 TL den 5 adedi 3334 TL, 2 adet 22 ayar aynal\u0131 \u00e7ember modelli alt\u0131n bilezik yada bedeli 1 tanesi 666,80 TL den 2 adedi toplam 1333,60 TL, 2 adet 22 ayar aynal\u0131 \u00e7ember modelli alt\u0131n bilezik yada bedeli 1 tanesi 666,80 TL den 2 adedi toplam 1333,60 TL, 2 adet 22 ayar aynal\u0131 \u00e7ember modelli alt\u0131n bilezik yada bedeli 1 tanesi 666,80 TL den 2 adedi toplam 1333,60 TL, 7 adet 22 ayar muhtelif i\u015flemeli alt\u0131n bilezik yada 1 adedi 416,75 TL den 7 adedi toplam 2917,25 TL, 1 adet 22 ayar \u00e7eyrek alt\u0131n yada bedeli 145,86 TL, 4 adet 22 ayar alt\u0131n yada 1 tanesi 83,35 TL den 4 adedi toplam 333,40 TL, 29 adet 22 ayar \u00e7eyrek Cumhuriyet alt\u0131n\u0131 yada bedeli 1 tanesi 145,86 TL den 29 adedi toplam 4230,01 TL olmak \u00fczere, alt\u0131nlar\u0131n aynen iadesi yada toplam bedeli 27.488,57 TL bedelinin dava tarihinden itibaren yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine, davac\u0131n\u0131n fazlaya ili\u015fkin talebinin reddine, karar verilmi\u015f, h\u00fck\u00fcm taraflarca temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
1-) Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle kanuni gerektirici sebeplere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re, daval\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131n\u0131n sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
2-) Dava; d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n aynen iadesi olmazsa bedelinin tahsili talebine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
Kural olarak d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn s\u0131ras\u0131nda tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131, kim taraf\u0131ndan, kime tak\u0131l\u0131rsa tak\u0131ls\u0131n, kad\u0131na ba\u011f\u0131\u015flanm\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r ve art\u0131k kad\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel mal\u0131 kabul edilir.
\nNe var ki somut olayda; h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda geline ve damada tak\u0131lan ziynetler e\u015fyalar\u0131 ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f, mahkemece de yaln\u0131zca geline tak\u0131lanlar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tahsil karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
O halde mahkemece; h\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunda, d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn s\u0131ras\u0131nda geline ve damada tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen t\u00fcm ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken, yukar\u0131daki \u015fekilde davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fc do\u011fru g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3-) Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun 297.maddesi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn sonu\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eye ait herhangi bir s\u00f6z tekrar edilmeksizin istek sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle taraflara y\u00fckletilen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda; a\u00e7\u0131k \u015f\u00fcphe ve teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesini emredici kural olarak getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Buna g\u00f6re; istem hakk\u0131nda karar verilirken istenilen e\u015fyalar\u0131n her biri hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmle taraflara y\u00fckletilen bor\u00e7 ve tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse s\u0131ra numaras\u0131 alt\u0131nda birer, birer, a\u00e7\u0131k, \u015f\u00fcphe ve infazda teredd\u00fct uyand\u0131rmayacak \u015fekilde g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece; bilirki\u015fi raporu esas al\u0131narak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015f olsa da h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131nda bedelinin tahsiline karar verilen ziynetlerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n cins, ayar\u0131 belirtilmi\u015f ise de gramlar\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmemi\u015ftir. H\u00fckme esas al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporu incelendi\u011finde; varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen bileziklerin cins, ayar ve gram\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
\nO halde mahkemece; h\u00fck\u00fcm k\u0131sm\u0131nda tahsiline karar verilen ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n cins, nitelik, miktar (gram ve ayar\u0131) ve de\u011ferlerinin ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi gerekirken infazda teredd\u00fct yaratacak \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da (1) nolu bendde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle temyiz eden daval\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131n\u0131n sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, (2) ve (3) nolu bendlerde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle temyiz edilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyiz eden davac\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun ge\u00e7ici madde 3 atf\u0131yla 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 HUMK.nun 440.maddesi gere\u011fince karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 15 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde karar d\u00fczeltme yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere, 06.12.2017 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 06.12.2017 tarihli, 2016\/7410 E., 2017\/17097 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 3. Hukuk Dairesi 2016\/7410 E., 2017\/17097 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u0130LE MAHKEMES\u0130 Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki e\u015fya alaca\u011f\u0131 davas\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne y\u00f6nelik olarak verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde taraflarca temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine; temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra, dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okunup gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Y A R G I T A Y\u00a0 \u00a0K A R A R I Davac\u0131; daval\u0131 ile … 5. Aile Mahkemesinin 2012\/908E.-2013\/813K. say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile bo\u015fand\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, evlenirken \u00f6nce …’da daha sonra …’da d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn merasimi yapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu merasimlerde bir tak\u0131m ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131 ve nakit paran\u0131n tak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sonra daval\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan al\u0131narak daval\u0131n\u0131n bekarl\u0131k d\u00f6nemindeki bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6demede kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra da geri verilmedi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, dava konusu alt\u0131nlar\u0131n aynen iadesi yada \u015fimdilik 1000 TL sinin yasal faizi ile birlikte daval\u0131dan tahsiline karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015f daha sonra taleplerini \u0131slanh ederek 36.261,16 TL’ye artt\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daval\u0131; taraflar\u0131n tayin sebebi ile d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u00f6ncesi nikah k\u0131yd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra … ve … da iki ayr\u0131 d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn yaparak birlikte ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, kendisinin d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden yedi ay \u00f6nce hekim olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, birikim yaparak bor\u00e7suz olarak evlendi\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n para ve alt\u0131nlar\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 kendi \u015fahsi harcamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 da borsada kaybetti\u011fini beyan ederek davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n