T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
YUNUS USLUER VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/24122)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Ay\u015fenur TUNCER<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yunus USLUER ve di\u011ferleri [bkz. ekli tablo (C) s\u00fctunu]<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru; koronavir\u00fcs salg\u0131n\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nemde spor faaliyetlerinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 ile e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru tarihinde ba\u015fvurucular ceza infaz kurumunda bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular, koronavir\u00fcs (Covid-19) salg\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6neminde bulunduklar\u0131 ceza infaz kurumuna ba\u015fvurarak g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere getirilen k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Kurumun \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle al\u0131nan tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda hem hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n bula\u015fma riskini hem de kurum \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme taleplerinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucular, aileleriyle ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapmalar\u0131na izin verilmemesi nedeniyle ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda; ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n toplu olarak ya\u015fanan yerler oldu\u011fu ve bula\u015f\u0131c\u0131 hastal\u0131klar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan risk olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere gelecek olan aile bireylerinin say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n fazla olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ziyaret\u00e7i kabul mahallinde g\u00f6revliler ve ziyaret\u00e7iler aras\u0131ndaki temas\u0131n artaca\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yete konu edilen uygulamalar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile kamu yarar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek usule ve kanuna uygun bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca Sa\u011fl\u0131k Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Bilim Kurulunun tavsiye kararlar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda haz\u0131rlanan Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza ve Tevkifevleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn (Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck) yaz\u0131s\u0131 gere\u011fince g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin uygulama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurgulanarak ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetleri reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bu kararlara y\u00f6nelik itirazlar\u0131, \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi karar\u0131nda usule ve kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir husus bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemelerince reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurular, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
6. Ekli listenin (B) s\u00fctununda g\u00f6sterilen dosyalar\u0131n konu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuki irtibat\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle 2020\/24122 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve incelemenin 2020\/24122 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
7. Talebi olan ve \u00f6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011funu belirten ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
A. Aile Hayat\u0131na Sayg\u0131 Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucular, a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131n\u0131n aileleri ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla olan ili\u015fkilerini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrebilmeleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli oldu\u011funu ancak Covid-19 d\u00f6neminde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin incelenmesinde Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n, ayr\u0131ca Ceza ve Tevkifevleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden temin edilen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ve ilgili belgelerin dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n bu k\u0131sm\u0131, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ziyaret hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n \u015fik\u00e2yeti, yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ailesini yeterli \u015fekilde g\u00f6rememesidir. Anayasa Mahkemesi 11\/3\/2020 tarihinden sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131nda uygulanan a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale olu\u015fturdu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir (Yunus Bulut, B. No: 2020\/38826, 20\/7\/2023, \u00a7 42). Somut olayda da bu sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 madde gerek\u00e7esi de dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda resm\u00ee makamlar\u0131n \u00f6zel hayata ve aile hayat\u0131na m\u00fcdahale edememesi ile ki\u015finin ferd\u00ee ve aile hayat\u0131n\u0131 kendi anlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi d\u00fczenleyip ya\u015fayabilmesi gere\u011fine i\u015faret etmektedir (Murat At\u0131lgan, B. No: 2013\/9047, 7\/5\/2015, \u00a7 22; Marcus Frank Cerny [GK], B. No: 2013\/5126, 2\/7\/2015, \u00a7 36).<\/p>\n
13. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n \u00f6zel ve aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesi hakk\u0131, ceza infaz kurumu idaresinin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n ailesi ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla temas\u0131n\u0131 devam ettirecek \u00f6nlemleri almas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lmaktad\u0131r (Mehmet Zahit \u015eahin, B. No: 2013\/4708, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7 36). Ancak ceza infaz kurumunda bulunman\u0131n do\u011fal sonucu olarak idarenin tutuklu ve h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin an\u0131lan hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahalesi konusunda takdir yetkisinin daha geni\u015f oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmelidir (Mehmet Koray Erya\u015fa, B. No: 2013\/6693, 16\/4\/2015, \u00a7 89).<\/p>\n
14. Bu durumla birlikte temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklere getirilen s\u0131n\u0131rlamalar Anayasa’n\u0131n 13. maddesinde yer alan kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle \u015fekl\u00ee anlamda bir kanuna dayanmal\u0131d\u0131r (Mehmet Akdo\u011fan ve Di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/817, 19\/12\/2013, \u00a7 31; B\u00fclent Polat [GK], B. No: 2013\/7666, 10\/12\/2015, \u00a7 75; Fatih Saraman [GK], B. No: 2014\/7256, 27\/2\/2019, \u00a7 65; Turgut Duman, B. No: 2014\/15365, 29\/5\/2019, \u00a7 66). Bununla birlikte \u015fekl\u00ee bir kanunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeterli olmay\u0131p ayn\u0131 zamanda kanun, s\u0131n\u0131rlaman\u0131n eri\u015filebilirli\u011fini, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirli\u011fini ve kesinli\u011fini ortaya koymal\u0131d\u0131r (Halime Sare Aysal [GK], B. No: 2013\/1789, 11\/11\/2015, \u00a7 63; Fatih Saraman, \u00a7 67; Turgut Duman, \u00a7 68; Mustafa Ceyhan, B. No: 2020\/13362, 19\/10\/2023, \u00a7 27). Bu kapsamda hak ya da \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe m\u00fcdahale eden kural takdir alan\u0131n\u0131 belirli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclerde elbette uygulay\u0131c\u0131ya b\u0131rakabilir. Fakat bu takdir alan\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131n\u0131n da yeterli a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131kta belirlenmesi ve kural\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirli\u011fi sa\u011flayacak \u015fekilde asgari bir kesinlik i\u00e7ermesi zaruridir (Halime Sare Aysal, \u00a7 65; Fatih Saraman, \u00a7 69; Turgut Duman, \u00a7 70; Tamer Mahmuto\u011flu [GK], B. No: 2017\/38953, 23\/7\/2020, \u00a7 107).<\/p>\n
15. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na y\u00f6nelik bir m\u00fcdahalenin de Anayasa’n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00fcvencelere uygun kabul edilebilmesinin ilk ve temel \u015fart\u0131 m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulunmas\u0131d\u0131r. Hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc k\u0131s\u0131tlay\u0131c\u0131 bir kanunun kapsam\u0131n\u0131 geni\u015fletici yorum ve uygulamalar, kanun koyucunun getirmedi\u011fi bir s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rman\u0131n idari ve yarg\u0131sal makamlarca ihdas edilmesi sonucunu do\u011furabilir. Bu a\u00e7\u0131dan hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckleri s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131ran kurallara ili\u015fkin yorum ve uygulamalar\u0131n kural\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131 geni\u015fletici nitelikte olmamas\u0131 ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir s\u0131n\u0131rlar i\u00e7inde kalmas\u0131 \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r (M.B. [GK], B. No: 2018\/37392, 23\/7\/2020, \u00a7 104; Mehmet \u00c7etinkaya ve D.K. [GK], B. No: 2018\/27392, 15\/4\/2021, \u00a7 45).<\/p>\n
16. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin ziyaret ya da g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 83. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi somut ba\u015fvuruya konu olan tedbirleri Yunus Bulut karar\u0131nda kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fc ba\u011flam\u0131nda incelemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, yukar\u0131da belirtilen kanuni d\u00fczenlemenin mahpuslar\u0131n ziyaret hakk\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da engellenmesi konusunda idari makamlara a\u00e7\u0131k ve genel bir yetki vermedi\u011fini, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan bu m\u00fcdahalenin salt idari makamlar\u0131n kararlar\u0131na dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederek m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (Yunus Bulut, \u00a7\u00a7 55, 57, 58).<\/p>\n
17. Somut ba\u015fvurulara konu edilen s\u00fcre\u00e7te de Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fck taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131 do\u011frultusunda 14\/3\/2020 tarihinden itibaren mahpuslar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k ve kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f haklar\u0131na k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar getirilmi\u015f ve farkl\u0131 tarihlerde yinelenen yaz\u0131larla k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar 29\/4\/2022 tarihine kadar uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular, Covid-19 tedbirleri kapsam\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f hakk\u0131na getirilen k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n aile hayatlar\u0131n\u0131 olumsuz etkiledi\u011finden yak\u0131nmaktad\u0131r. Ziyaret hakk\u0131n\u0131n idare taraf\u0131ndan k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131na imk\u00e2n veren a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen s\u00f6z konusu tedbirin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden Yunus Bulut karar\u0131nda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni temelinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (benzer y\u00f6nde kararlar i\u00e7in bkz. S\u00fcleyman Kurt (2), B. No: 2020\/30704, 7\/3\/2024; Murat K\u0131l\u0131\u00e7 ve Di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2020\/25564, 7\/3\/2024; Mehmet Ata K\u0131z\u0131l\u00e7\u0131nar, B. No: 2020\/29397, 6\/6\/2024).<\/p>\n
18. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Maddi ve Manevi Varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Korunmas\u0131 ve Geli\u015ftirilmesi Hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
19. Birinci ba\u015fvurucu Yunus Usluer ayr\u0131ca Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterilerek ceza infaz kurumunda spor faaliyetlerinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle spor hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
20. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; hak ihlali bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda inceleme yap\u0131l\u0131rken Anayasa, ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131 ve somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu iddia ceza infaz kurumundaki iyile\u015ftirme programlar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda spor alanlar\u0131ndan yararlanma faaliyetine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan Anayasa’n\u0131n 17. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
22. H\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc veya tutuklular, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda hukuka uygun olarak ki\u015fi \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131ndan mahrum b\u0131rak\u0131labilirken (\u0130brahim Uysal, B. No: 2014\/1711, 23\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 29-33) genel olarak Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme\u2019nin ortak alan\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlere sahiptir. Bununla birlikte ceza infaz kurumunda tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olarak su\u00e7un \u00f6nlenmesi ve disiplinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gibi ceza infaz kurumunda g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kabul edilebilir, makul gerekliliklerin olmas\u0131 durumunda sahip olunan haklar s\u0131n\u0131rlanabilir (Turan G\u00fcnana, B. No: 2013\/3550, 19\/11\/2014, \u00a7 35).<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130brahim Kaptan (B. No: 2017\/30510, 18\/7\/2018) karar\u0131nda, ceza infaz kurumunda tutulman\u0131n ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz sonucu olarak su\u00e7un \u00f6nlenmesi ve disiplinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gibi kurumda g\u00fcvenli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik kabul edilebilir, makul gerekliliklerin bulundu\u011fu h\u00e2llerde iyile\u015ftirme faaliyetlerinde ge\u00e7ici s\u00fcreyle k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar yap\u0131labilece\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Somut olayda sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in al\u0131nan tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda spor faaliyetlerinde yap\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n ge\u00e7ici tedbir mahiyetinde oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Ayr\u0131ca 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ve 31083 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n Y\u00f6netimi ile Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik (Y\u00f6netmelik) h\u00fck\u00fcmleri birlikte incelendi\u011finde, iyile\u015ftirme programlar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda spor alanlar\u0131ndan yararlanma faaliyetine kat\u0131labilecek h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fclerin belirlenmesi hususunda idare ve g\u00f6zlem kurulu taraf\u0131ndan karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvuru konusu olayda ise ba\u015fvurucunun sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu da g\u00f6zetilerek spor yapabilece\u011fine dair kurul taraf\u0131ndan bir karar al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ve iddias\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bunun yan\u0131nda Y\u00f6netmelik’e g\u00f6re mahpuslar\u0131n ko\u011fu\u015flarda bireysel spor yapma olana\u011f\u0131 mevcut oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel spor yapamad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ya da engellendi\u011fine dair bir iddia da ileri s\u00fcrmedi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun ge\u00e7ici bir s\u00fcre toplu spor faaliyetine kat\u0131lamaman\u0131n kendisi \u00fczerindeki olumsuz etkilerini de ortaya koymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. Bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucu, ihlal iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin delillerini sunma ve temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011funu destekleyecek ve ortaya koyacak nitelik ve yeterlilikte bilgi ve belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu iddialar\u0131n\u0131 temellendirmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Di\u011fer \u0130hlal \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fvuruculardan Yunus Usluer ve Sad\u0131k Benli ayr\u0131ca e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
28. Anayasa’n\u0131n 10. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen e\u015fitlik ilkesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi’nin (S\u00f6zle\u015fme) 14. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine y\u00f6nelik iddialar\u0131n soyut olarak de\u011ferlendirilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmay\u0131p mutlaka Anayasa ve S\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda yer alan di\u011fer temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olarak ele al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekir (Onurhan Solmaz, B. No: 2012\/1049, 26\/3\/2013, \u00a7 33).<\/p>\n
29. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucunun kendisiyle benzer durumdaki ki\u015filere y\u00f6nelik farkl\u0131 uygulamalar\u0131n me\u015fru bir temeli olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u0131rk, renk, cinsiyet, din, dil vb. ayr\u0131mc\u0131 bir nedene dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 makul delillerle ortaya koymas\u0131 gerekir (Adnan Oktar (3), B. No: 2013\/1123, 2\/10\/2013, \u00a7 50).<\/p>\n
30. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n kendisiyle ayn\u0131 durumda olanlardan farkl\u0131 bir uygulamaya maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlaline ili\u015fkin somut bir bilgi ya da belge sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucular taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n temellendirilemedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
31. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n daa\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n t\u00fcm\u00fc; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvurucular bulundu\u011fu ceza infaz kurumundan tahliye edilmi\u015f olup ayn\u0131 zamanda Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6nemindeki k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar ortadan kalkt\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in t\u00fcm ba\u015fvurucular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
34. Eski h\u00e2le getirme kural\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvuruculara manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 34.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddi tazminat talep eden ba\u015fvurucular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise maddi zarara ili\u015fkin olarak bilgi\/belge sunmad\u0131klar\u0131ndan maddi tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurular\u0131n B\u0130RLE\u015eT\u0130R\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
B. Talepte bulunan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
C. Ekli tablonun (H) s\u00fctununda belirtilen ve gizlilik talep eden ba\u015fvurucu bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde bu ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
D. 1. Aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu Yunus Usluer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucular Yunus Usluer ve Sad\u0131k Benli y\u00f6n\u00fcnden di\u011fer ihlal iddialar\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
E. Anayasa’n\u0131n 20. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. Ba\u015fvuruculara net 34.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n AYRI AYRI \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. Ekli tablonun (E) s\u00fctununda belirtilen harc\u0131n ilgili ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
H. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
\u0130. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in ekli tablonun (D) s\u00fctunundaki ilgili h\u00e2kimliklere ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 22\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 22\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2020\/24122 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 YUNUS USLUER VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/24122) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Ay\u015fenur TUNCER Ba\u015fvurucular : Yunus USLUER ve di\u011ferleri [bkz. ekli tablo (C) s\u00fctunu] \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru; koronavir\u00fcs salg\u0131n\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda ceza infaz kurumundaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131n\u0131n, ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nemde spor faaliyetlerinin k\u0131s\u0131tlanmas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 ile e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvuru tarihinde ba\u015fvurucular ceza infaz kurumunda bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular, koronavir\u00fcs (Covid-19) salg\u0131n\u0131 d\u00f6neminde bulunduklar\u0131 ceza infaz kurumuna ba\u015fvurarak g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere getirilen k\u0131s\u0131tlamalar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Kurumun \u0130dare ve G\u00f6zlem Kurulu Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Covid-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle al\u0131nan tedbirler kapsam\u0131nda hem hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n bula\u015fma riskini hem de kurum \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme taleplerinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucular, aileleriyle ve yak\u0131nlar\u0131yla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme yapmalar\u0131na izin verilmemesi nedeniyle ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayarak \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fine \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi kararlar\u0131nda; ceza infaz kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n toplu olarak ya\u015fanan yerler oldu\u011fu ve bula\u015f\u0131c\u0131 hastal\u0131klar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan risk olu\u015fturdu\u011fu, h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc ve tutuklular\u0131n kapal\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flere gelecek olan aile …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n