ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/69<\/p>\n
Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/57<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi : 6\/3\/2025<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara 73. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
\u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 2\/7\/1964 tarihli ve 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan \u201cMuhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda\u2026\u201d ve \u201c\u2026yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam olunur, takip eden celseye kadar\u2026\u201d ibarelerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 5., 13., 35., 36., 40. ve 141. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptallerine karar verilmesi talebidir.<\/p>\n
OLAY: \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130<\/p>\n
Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 30. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u201cNoksan tesbit edilen de\u011fer \u00fczerinden harc\u0131n \u00f6denmesi:<\/p>\n
Madde 30- Muhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda tesbit olunan de\u011ferin, dava dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilen de\u011ferden fazla oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa, yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam olunur, takip eden celseye kadar noksan de\u011fer \u00fczerinden pe\u015fin karar ve ilam harc\u0131 tamamlanmad\u0131k\u00e7a davaya devam olunmaz. Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununun 409 uncu maddesinde g\u00f6sterilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde dosyan\u0131n muameleye konulmas\u0131, noksan olan harc\u0131n \u00f6denmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n
II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME<\/p>\n
1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Burcu TA\u015eYAPAN taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme raporu ve itiraz konusu kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmleri okunup incelendikten sonra gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
2. 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un \u201cAnayasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkemelerce ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmesi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinde Anayasa Mahkemesine itiraz yoluyla yap\u0131lacak ba\u015fvurularda izlenecek y\u00f6ntem belirtilmi\u015ftir. S\u00f6z konusu maddenin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda bir davaya bakmakta olan mahkemenin bu davada uygulanacak bir kanun veya Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararnamesinin h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini Anayasa’ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rmesi veya taraflardan birinin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n ciddi oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde an\u0131lan f\u0131krada say\u0131lan belgeleri dizi listesine ba\u011flayarak Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderece\u011fi kurala ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f; an\u0131lan f\u0131kran\u0131n (a) bendinde \u201c\u0130ptali istenen kurallar\u0131n Anayasan\u0131n hangi maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n asl\u0131\u201d, (b) bendinde \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d ve (c) bendinde \u201cDava dilek\u00e7esi, iddianame veya davay\u0131 a\u00e7an belgeler ile dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin onayl\u0131 \u00f6rnekleri\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilecek belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Maddenin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise a\u00e7\u0131k bir \u015fekilde dayanaktan yoksun veya y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmayan itiraz ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin gerek\u00e7eleriyle reddedilece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn (\u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck) 46. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendinde \u201cBa\u015fvuru karar\u0131na ili\u015fkin tutana\u011f\u0131n onayl\u0131 \u00f6rne\u011fi\u201d, (b) bendinde \u201cDava dilek\u00e7esi, iddianame veya davay\u0131 a\u00e7an belgeler ile dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin onayl\u0131 \u00f6rnekleri\u201d ve (c) bendinde \u201cDava dosyas\u0131nda sunulan belgelerin tarih s\u0131ras\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fl\u0131klar h\u00e2linde s\u0131raland\u0131\u011f\u0131 dizi pusulas\u0131\u201d Anayasa Mahkemesine sunulacak belgeler aras\u0131nda say\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 49. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) bendinde ise Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan ilk incelemede ba\u015fvuruda eksiklikler bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde itiraz yoluna ili\u015fkin i\u015flerde esas incelemeye ge\u00e7ilmeksizin ba\u015fvurunun reddine karar verilece\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Yap\u0131lan incelemede itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvuran Mahkemece gerek\u00e7eli ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131n\u0131n ekinde fiziki olarak g\u00f6nderilen belgelerin onayl\u0131 \u00f6rnek niteli\u011finde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu suretle dosyan\u0131n ilgili b\u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin onayl\u0131 \u00f6rneklerine yer verilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca s\u00f6z konusu belgelerin tarih s\u0131ras\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fl\u0131klar h\u00e2linde s\u0131raland\u0131\u011f\u0131 dizi pusulas\u0131n\u0131n da d\u00fczenlenmedi\u011fi tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla ba\u015fvurunun y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Kald\u0131 ki bak\u0131lmakta olan davada Mahkemece art\u0131r\u0131lan ve \u0131slah edilen tutar \u00fczerinden har\u00e7 yat\u0131rmas\u0131 i\u00e7in davac\u0131ya 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 107. ve 181. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca kesin s\u00fcre verildi\u011fi ve verilen bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u0131slah edilen miktara g\u00f6re hesaplanan harc\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fi, belirsiz alacak olarak talep edilen k\u0131s\u0131mlar i\u00e7in ise talep art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131nda bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde yarg\u0131lama s\u0131ras\u0131nda tespit olunan de\u011ferin dava dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilenden fazla olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yaln\u0131zca o celseye devam olunaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir sonraki celseye kadar pe\u015fin karar ve ilam harc\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131k\u00e7a davaya devam edilmeyece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren itiraz konusu kural\u0131n bak\u0131lmakta olan davada uygulanma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendi ile \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fck\u2019\u00fcn 46. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (b) ve (c) bentlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan reddi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
2\/7\/1964 tarihli ve 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan \u201cMuhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda\u2026\u201d ve \u201c\u2026yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam olunur, takip eden celseye kadar\u2026\u201d ibarelerinin iptallerine karar verilmesi talebiyle yap\u0131lan itiraz ba\u015fvurusunun 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 40. maddesinin (4) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fince y\u00f6ntemine uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan REDD\u0130NE 6\/3\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
Kadir \u00d6ZKAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkanvekili<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u0130rfan F\u0130DAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Muhterem \u0130NCE<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00dcye<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 6\/3\/2025 tarihli, 2025\/69 esas – 2025\/57 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI \u00a0 Esas Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/69 Karar Say\u0131s\u0131 : 2025\/57 Karar Tarihi : 6\/3\/2025 R.G. Tarih – Say\u0131 : Tebli\u011f edildi. \u00a0 \u0130T\u0130RAZ YOLUNA BA\u015eVURAN: Ankara 73. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi \u0130T\u0130RAZIN KONUSU: 2\/7\/1964 tarihli ve 492 say\u0131l\u0131 Har\u00e7lar Kanunu\u2019nun 30. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan \u201cMuhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda\u2026\u201d ve \u201c\u2026yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam olunur, takip eden celseye kadar\u2026\u201d ibarelerinin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 2., 5., 13., 35., 36., 40. ve 141. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptallerine karar verilmesi talebidir. OLAY: \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davada itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n Anayasa\u2019ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kan\u0131s\u0131na varan Mahkeme, iptali i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur. I. \u0130PTAL\u0130 \u0130STENEN KANUN H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130 Kanun\u2019un itiraz konusu kurallar\u0131n da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 30. maddesi \u015f\u00f6yledir: \u00a0\u201cNoksan tesbit edilen de\u011fer \u00fczerinden harc\u0131n \u00f6denmesi: Madde 30- Muhakeme s\u0131ras\u0131nda tesbit olunan de\u011ferin, dava dilek\u00e7esinde bildirilen de\u011ferden fazla oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131rsa, yaln\u0131z o celse i\u00e7in muhakemeye devam olunur, takip eden celseye kadar noksan de\u011fer \u00fczerinden pe\u015fin karar ve ilam harc\u0131 tamamlanmad\u0131k\u00e7a davaya devam olunmaz. Hukuk Usul\u00fc Muhakemeleri Kanununun 409 uncu maddesinde g\u00f6sterilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde dosyan\u0131n muameleye konulmas\u0131, noksan olan harc\u0131n \u00f6denmesine ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d II. \u0130LK \u0130NCELEME 1. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan ilk inceleme toplant\u0131s\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru karar\u0131 ve ekleri, Raport\u00f6r Burcu TA\u015eYAPAN taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan ilk inceleme …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-72496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n