T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
1. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>\n
2022\/7644 E., 2022\/8566 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi
\nSU\u00c7 : Azmettiren s\u0131fat\u0131yla nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM :Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 13\/01\/2022 tarih, 2021\/313 esas ve 2022\/10 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda maktule y\u00f6nelik azmettiren s\u0131fat\u0131yla nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan TCK\u2019nin 38\/1, 82\/1-d, 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair karar.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>\n
Mahalli mahkemece bozma \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan … Hizmetler Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine dosyan\u0131n yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesinde;<\/p>\n
Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131k …’nin (…) maktul …’na y\u00f6nelik eyleminin s\u00fcbutu kabul k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmas\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilip inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler ile reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re bozma \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmde bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan … Hizmetler Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekilinin su\u00e7 niteli\u011fine y\u00f6nelen, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin bir nedene dayanmayan ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz sebeplerinin reddiyle,<\/p>\n
1) Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 22\/09\/2022 tarih ve 2022\/42 esas, 2022\/574
\nsay\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 uyar\u0131nca TCK\u2019nin 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ister fiilden, isterse failin ya da ma\u011fdurun \u015fahs\u0131ndan ya da \u00f6zelliklerinden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olsun, eylemin nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n faile g\u00f6re belirlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi, \u015feriklerin su\u00e7la irtibatlar\u0131n\u0131n failin \u015fahs\u0131na ve i\u015fledi\u011fi fiile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k arz etti\u011fi halde, hakk\u0131nda verilen mahkumiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc kesinle\u015fen fail …’in maktule y\u00f6nelik kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan TCK’nin 81\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; san\u0131k …’nin (…) “azmettiren s\u0131fat\u0131yla kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme” su\u00e7undan TCK’nin 38\/1, 81\/1. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 yerine, ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131na yanl\u0131\u015f anlam verilmek ve su\u00e7 niteli\u011finde yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015fmek suretiyle, azmettiren s\u0131fat\u0131yla nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan ayn\u0131 Kanunun 38\/1, 82\/1-d maddeleri uyar\u0131nca yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
2) Kendisini vekil ile temsil ettiren kat\u0131lan … Hizmetler Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yarar\u0131na vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi,
\nBozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f olup, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan … Hizmetler Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekilinin temyiz sebepleri bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, re’sen de temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu nedenlerle 6723 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 33. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8\/1. maddesi ile y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’un 321. maddesi uyar\u0131nca tebli\u011fnamedeki d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak BOZULMASINA, 03\/11\/2022 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde \u00fcyeler … ile …’\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131 oylar\u0131 ve oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eI OY:
\nT\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131k …’in e\u015fi olan makt\u00fcl ile tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 nedeniyle arkada\u015f\u0131 olan san\u0131k …’e maktul\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrmesini s\u00f6ylemek suretiyle su\u00e7a azmettiren olarak i\u015ftirak etti\u011finin kabul edilerek ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek TCK’nin 38. maddesi yollamas\u0131 ile TCK’nin 81. maddesi uyar\u0131ca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esi ile karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na dair Dairemiz say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funun karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.
\nSu\u00e7a azmettirenin ceza sorumlulu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yasal d\u00fczenlemeye bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’na g\u00f6re su\u00e7un icras\u0131na i\u015ftirak etmekle birlikte, i\u015fleni\u015fine bulundu\u011fu katk\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi kanuni tan\u0131mdaki fiili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyen su\u00e7 ortaklar\u0131na \u201c\u015ferik\u201d denilmekte olup, \u015feriklik; azmettirme ve yard\u0131m etme olarak iki farkl\u0131 \u015fekilde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.
\nS\/3
\n5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 38\/1 maddesine g\u00f6re “Ba\u015fkas\u0131n\u0131 su\u00e7 i\u015flemeye azmettiren ki\u015fi, i\u015flenen su\u00e7un cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 40. maddesine g\u00f6re;
\n“Su\u00e7a i\u015ftirak i\u00e7in, kasten ve hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 i\u015flenmi\u015f bir fiilin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeterlidir. Su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015fine i\u015ftirak eden her ki\u015fi, di\u011ferinin cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nleyen ki\u015fisel nedenler g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmaks\u0131z\u0131n kendi kusurlu fiiline g\u00f6re cezaland\u0131r\u0131l\u0131r.
\n\u00d6zg\u00fc su\u00e7larda, ancak \u00f6zel faillik niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131yan ki\u015fi fail olabilir. Bu su\u00e7larda i\u015fleni\u015fine i\u015ftirak eden di\u011fer ki\u015filer ise azmettiren veya yard\u0131m eden olarak sorumlu tutulur.” d\u00fczenlemesi yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Ancak TCK’nin 38 ve 40. maddelerinin azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011funu tam olarak kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6zellikle su\u00e7a konu olayda oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde su\u00e7un nitelikli halleri ve \u015fahsa ba\u011fl\u0131 cezay\u0131 att\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 nedenler konusunda bir a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Cezay\u0131 art\u0131ran \u015fahsi sebeplere ili\u015fkin 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 66. maddesi ile cezay\u0131 artt\u0131ran fiili sebepleri d\u00fczenleyen765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 66. maddesinin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’na al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 40 maddesinin her iki maddeye ili\u015fkin olarak k\u0131smi bir d\u00fczenlemeye sahip oldu\u011fu, sorunun \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re uygulamaya b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. TCK’nin 38. maddesinde azmettirenin i\u015flenen su\u00e7un cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n i\u015flenen su\u00e7un kime g\u00f6re belirlenece\u011finin a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu kapsamda azmettirenin \u015ferik olarak failin i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7a i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilir ise de azmettirenin azmettirdi\u011fi su\u00e7 ile failin i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7un farkl\u0131 olmas\u0131 durumunda azmettirenin TCK’nin 38 ve 40. maddeleri uyar\u0131ca i\u015flenen su\u00e7un cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekece\u011fi ancak gerek Dairemizin gerekse Ceza Genel Kurulunun yerle\u015fik uygulamas\u0131na g\u00f6re azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011funun i\u015ftirak ve su\u00e7 kast\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel h\u00fck\u00fcmler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde belirlendi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Bu kapsamda Yarg\u0131tay kararlar\u0131nda azmettirenin silahla kasten yaralama su\u00e7una azmettirdi\u011fi halde failin s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 a\u015farak kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu i\u015flemesi durumunda azmettirenin TCK’nin 87\/4. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda kast\u0131 a\u015fan \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan sorumlu tutulmas\u0131, azmettirenin h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu azmettirdi\u011fi halde neticeyi bilme ve isteme iradesine g\u00f6re failin i\u015fledi\u011fi nitelikli ya\u011fma su\u00e7undan sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 gibi azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011funun i\u015flenen su\u00e7a ve faile g\u00f6re de\u011fil azmettirenin kast\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlendi\u011fi bir \u00e7ok uygulaman\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu oldu\u011fu a\u015fikard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’nin 21\/1 maddesine g\u00f6re “Su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 kast\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Kast su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir.”<\/p>\n
Kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun manevi unsuru genel kastt\u0131r. TCK\u2019nin 21\/1. maddesine g\u00f6re “kast su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir.” \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemli olan, \u00f6l\u00fcm neticesinin bilinmi\u015f ve istenmi\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Olayda kast\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve bunun \u00f6l\u00fcm neticesine y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu mahkemece tespit edilecektir. Somut olay\u0131m\u0131za bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131zda san\u0131k …’in ..\/..
\nS\/4
\nmaktul ile evli oldu\u011fu ancak e\u015fi ile anla\u015famad\u0131klar\u0131 bir s\u00fcreden beri di\u011fer san\u0131k … ile birlikte ya\u015famaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 olay g\u00fcn\u00fc maktul ile ortak olduklar\u0131 evde bulunduklar\u0131 s\u0131rada …’in, … ile birlikteli\u011fi y\u00fcz\u00fcnden tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, …’in …’i arayarak maktul\u00fcn kendisini darp etti\u011fini ve eve gelmesini istedi\u011fi, …’in de av t\u00fcfe\u011fi alarak ikamete gitti\u011fi ve …’in …’i gizlice eve ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve …’in f\u0131rsat\u0131n\u0131 buldu\u011fu anda maktul\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. San\u0131k …’in e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131 ile hareket etti\u011fi sabittir. Bu kapsamda san\u0131k … y\u00f6n\u00fcnden TCK’nin 82\/1-d maddesindeki e\u015fe kar\u015f\u0131 kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unun t\u00fcm unsurlar\u0131 ile olu\u015ftu\u011fu halde say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funluk taraf\u0131ndan ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ile san\u0131k …’in eylemine tabi olarak TCK’nin 81. maddesi ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 adalete ve hukuka uygun de\u011fildir. Somut olaya bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda mahkemenin uygulamalar\u0131na g\u00f6re san\u0131k …’in kendisinin e\u015fi olan maktule ate\u015f ederek \u00f6ld\u00fcrmesi halinde TCK’nin 82\/1-d, 29, 62. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 20 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi, somut olayda ise san\u0131k …’in arkada\u015f\u0131 …’den bu i\u015fi yapmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyerek e\u015fi olan maktul\u00fc \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye azmettirmesi nedeniyle TCK’nin 81, 29, 62. maddeleri gere\u011fince 15 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilece\u011fi, san\u0131k …’in kendisi ate\u015f etseydi 5 y\u0131l daha fazla ceza alaca\u011f\u0131 halde, ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131na yanl\u0131\u015f anlam verilmesi nedeniyle su\u00e7 i\u015fleme karar\u0131 olmayan arkada\u015f\u0131na azmettirmek suretiyle e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcrtt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7in 5 y\u0131l daha az ceza almas\u0131na yol a\u00e7an hukuka ve adalete ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir uygulaman\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Yukar\u0131da ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011funun sadece TCK’nin 38 ve 40. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca i\u015flenen su\u00e7 veya faile g\u00f6re belirlenmesinin hukuka ve adalete ayk\u0131r\u0131 sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furdu\u011fu bu nedenle TCK’nin 38 ve 40. maddelerinin kast ve i\u015ftirake ili\u015fkin genel h\u00fck\u00fcmler ile birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesinin zorunlu oldu\u011fu aksi halde somut olayda oldu\u011fu gibi san\u0131k …’in e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcrme kast\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi ve e\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc ile neticeye de ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde su\u00e7un failinden dolay\u0131 daha az ceza almas\u0131 gibi uygulamalara yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6zellikle TCK’nin 82\/1-d maddesinde \u00fcstsoy veya altsoydan birine, e\u015f ve karde\u015fe kar\u015f\u0131, TCK’nin 82\/1-j maddesinde kan g\u00fctme saikiyle ve TCK’nin 82\/1-k maddesinde t\u00f6re saikiyle i\u015flenen nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7lar\u0131nda asli faillerin daha az ceza almak amac\u0131yla menfaat, akrabal\u0131k, hizmet ili\u015fkisi vs sebeplerle 3. ki\u015fileri su\u00e7a azmettirerek kast ettikleri neticeyi elde etme y\u00f6ntemini benimseyebilecekleri, hukuk sisteminin kanuna kar\u015f\u0131 hile ve hakk\u0131n k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 korumas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu olamayaca\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131n\u0131 b\u00f6yle bir sonuca neden olacak \u015fekilde yorumlamak yasan\u0131n amac\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 olacakt\u0131r. Failin azmettirenin kastetti\u011fi su\u00e7tan farkl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi(kasten yaralama su\u00e7una azmettirilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 failin cinsel istismar su\u00e7unu i\u015flemesi vb.) veya azmettirilen su\u00e7 yan\u0131nda ba\u015fka su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi (kasten yaralama su\u00e7una azmettirilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n failin ma\u011fduru darp ettikten sonra ani kas\u0131tla paras\u0131n\u0131 alarak ya\u011fma su\u00e7unu i\u015flemesi vb.) veya azmettirenin kast\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ( silahl\u0131 yaralamaya azmettirildi\u011fi halde failin ma\u011fduru \u00f6ld\u00fcrmesi vb.) gibi durumlarda sadece TCK’nin 38. ..\/..
\nS\/5
\nve 40. maddelerin lafz\u0131na g\u00f6re bir uygulama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde azmettirenin de i\u015flenen su\u00e7 veya faile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermek gerekecektir. Ancak gerek Dairemiz gerek Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun istikrar kazanan kararlar\u0131nda ceza adaletinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yukar\u0131daki olaylarda azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011funun TCK’nin 38 ve 40. maddeleri ile kast ve i\u015ftirake ili\u015fkin genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin birlikte de\u011ferlendirilmesi ve kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle azmettirenin kast\u0131 veya kast\u0131n\u0131n a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ve i\u015ftirak iradesinin kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re karara ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015flenen su\u00e7 veya faile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve failin azmettirenin kastetti\u011fi su\u00e7tan farkl\u0131 bir su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi halinde azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011fu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, failin azmettirilen su\u00e7 yan\u0131nda ba\u015fka su\u00e7 i\u015flemesi halinde azmettirenin sadece azmettirdi\u011fi su\u00e7tan sorumlu oldu\u011funa, failin azmettirenin kast\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmas\u0131 silahl\u0131 yaralamaya azmettirildi\u011fi halde failin ma\u011fduru \u00f6ld\u00fcrmesi halinde ise azmettirenin kast\u0131 a\u015fan \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan sorumlu oldu\u011funa dair kararlar verildi\u011fi nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ceza adaletinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in azmettirenin kast\u0131 ile ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen neticenin farkl\u0131 olmas\u0131 hallerinde azmettirenin sorumlulu\u011funun kast ve i\u015ftirake ili\u015fkin genel h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re belirlenebildi\u011fine g\u00f6re, san\u0131k …’in e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131 azmettirdi\u011fi, e\u015finin \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ile istenilen neticenin de ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi olayda san\u0131k …’in TCK’nin 21\/1. maddesinin “Kast su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir.” \u015feklindeki tan\u0131ma tamamen uygun olarak e\u015fe kar\u015f\u0131 nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finden TCK’nin 82\/1-d maddesi uyar\u0131nca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi halde ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131na yanl\u0131\u015f anlam verilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’nin 81. maddesi uyar\u0131ca cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na dair \u00e7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne muhalefet ediyoruz.17.11.202<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi\u2019nin 3. 11. 2022 tarihli, 2022\/7644 esas ve 2022\/8566 karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesi 2022\/7644 E., 2022\/8566 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi SU\u00c7 : Azmettiren s\u0131fat\u0131yla nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme H\u00dcK\u00dcM :Mu\u011fla 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin 13\/01\/2022 tarih, 2021\/313 esas ve 2022\/10 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda maktule y\u00f6nelik azmettiren s\u0131fat\u0131yla nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan TCK\u2019nin 38\/1, 82\/1-d, 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair karar. T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA Mahalli mahkemece bozma \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ile kat\u0131lan … Hizmetler Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyizi \u00fczerine dosyan\u0131n yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesinde; Gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: Toplanan deliller karar yerinde incelenip, san\u0131k …’nin (…) maktul …’na y\u00f6nelik eyleminin s\u00fcbutu kabul k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, savunmas\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilip inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 gerek\u00e7eler ile reddedilmi\u015f, incelenen dosyaya g\u00f6re bozma \u00fczerine verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmde bozma nedenleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lan … Hizmetler Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekilinin su\u00e7 niteli\u011fine y\u00f6nelen, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin bir nedene dayanmayan ve yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen temyiz sebeplerinin reddiyle, 1) Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 22\/09\/2022 tarih ve 2022\/42 esas, 2022\/574 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 uyar\u0131nca TCK\u2019nin 40. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k kural\u0131 uyar\u0131nca ister fiilden, isterse failin ya da ma\u011fdurun \u015fahs\u0131ndan ya da \u00f6zelliklerinden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olsun, eylemin nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n faile g\u00f6re belirlenmesinin gerekti\u011fi, \u015feriklerin su\u00e7la irtibatlar\u0131n\u0131n failin \u015fahs\u0131na ve i\u015fledi\u011fi fiile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k arz etti\u011fi halde, hakk\u0131nda verilen mahkumiyet …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n