{"id":54806,"date":"2025-04-13T23:59:00","date_gmt":"2025-04-13T20:59:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/uncategorized-tr\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/"},"modified":"2025-04-13T23:59:00","modified_gmt":"2025-04-13T20:59:00","slug":"yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>T.C.<\/p>\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>15. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n<p>2012\/7291 E., 2012\/7596 K.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemesi :Asliye Hukuk Hakimli\u011fi<\/p>\n<p>Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f ve dahili daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen g\u00fcnde taraf vekilleri yap\u0131lan tebligata ra\u011fmen gelmediklerinden incelemenin evrak \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten ve temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okundu i\u015fin gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; K A R A R &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olup daval\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye yap\u0131lan fazla \u00f6demenin sebepsiz zenginle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re dahili daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, reddi gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>2-Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131n\u0131n in\u015faat\u0131 %30 seviyesine kadar yaparak i\u015fi terketti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen imal\u00e2t bedeli 33.060 &#8230;\u2019nun \u00f6dedi\u011fi 94.500 &#8230;\u2019dan mahsup edilerek fazla yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin istirdad\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Daval\u0131 in\u015faat yap\u0131m\u0131 ile ilgili akd\u00ee ili\u015fkiyi kabul etmemekle birlikte &#8230; 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2006\/142 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 delil tespit dosyas\u0131nda vekilinin verdi\u011fi 24.07.2006 tarihli tespite itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131dan 98.500 &#8230; olan alaca\u011f\u0131ndan 94.500 &#8230;\u2019sunu tahsil etti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015f, gerek tespit dosyas\u0131nda gerekse de yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda davac\u0131lardan ba\u015fka ili\u015fkiler nedeniyle 98.500 &#8230; alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funu yasal delillerle kan\u0131tlayamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda mahallinde yap\u0131lan ke\u015fif sonras\u0131 d\u00fczenlenen ve delil tespit raporuna g\u00f6re daval\u0131lar lehine olup davac\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilen 15.01.2009 tarihli bilirki\u015fi kurulu raporu ile daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi y\u00fcklenici \u0130smail\u2019in ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi imal\u00e2t\u0131n tespit ve dava tarihi itibariyle 73.014,00 TL oldu\u011fu saptanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu durumda mahkemece davac\u0131 yanca daval\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi imal\u00e2t bedeli d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek talepte bulunuldu\u011fu ve daval\u0131lar\u0131n murisi y\u00fcklenici \u0130smail\u2019in vekilinin delil tespit dosyas\u0131na verdi\u011fi beyan dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131lardan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tahsilat\u0131n\u0131n 94.500 &#8230; oldu\u011fu kabul edildi\u011finden ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen imal\u00e2t tutar\u0131 73.014,00 TL\u2019nin dava tarihindeki kur \u00fczerinden &#8230;\u2019ya \u00e7evrilerek tahsil edilen 94.500 &#8230;\u2019dan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclmek suretiyle kalan miktar \u00fczerinden davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken yanl\u0131\u015f de\u011ferlendirme sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 miktarda k\u0131smen kabul karar\u0131 verilmesi do\u011fru olmam\u0131\u015f, bozulmas\u0131 uygun bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da 1. bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle dahili daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, 2. bent uyar\u0131nca kabul\u00fc ile h\u00fckm\u00fcn davac\u0131lar yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA, Yarg\u0131tay duru\u015fmas\u0131nda vekille temsil olunmayan davac\u0131lar yarar\u0131na vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti takdirine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, \u00f6dedi\u011fi temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde temyiz eden davac\u0131lara geri verilmesine, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye 1.233,55 TL temyiz ilam harc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden dahili daval\u0131lardan al\u0131nmas\u0131na, 03.12.2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>\u200bYarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 03.12.2012 tarihli 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n<p>Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 15. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/7291 E., 2012\/7596 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi :Asliye Hukuk Hakimli\u011fi Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f ve dahili daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen g\u00fcnde taraf vekilleri yap\u0131lan tebligata ra\u011fmen gelmediklerinden incelemenin evrak \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten ve temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okundu i\u015fin gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: &#8211; K A R A R &#8211; Dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olup daval\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye yap\u0131lan fazla \u00f6demenin sebepsiz zenginle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re dahili daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, reddi gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131n\u0131n in\u015faat\u0131 %30 seviyesine kadar yaparak i\u015fi terketti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen imal\u00e2t bedeli 33.060 &#8230;\u2019nun \u00f6dedi\u011fi 94.500 &#8230;\u2019dan mahsup edilerek fazla yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin istirdad\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 in\u015faat yap\u0131m\u0131 ile ilgili akd\u00ee ili\u015fkiyi kabul etmemekle birlikte &#8230; 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2006\/142 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 delil tespit dosyas\u0131nda vekilinin verdi\u011fi 24.07.2006 tarihli tespite itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131dan 98.500 &#8230; olan alaca\u011f\u0131ndan 94.500 &#8230;\u2019sunu tahsil &hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v27.1.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ru_RU\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#039;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 15. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/7291 E., 2012\/7596 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi :Asliye Hukuk Hakimli\u011fi Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f ve dahili daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen g\u00fcnde taraf vekilleri yap\u0131lan tebligata ra\u011fmen gelmediklerinden incelemenin evrak \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten ve temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okundu i\u015fin gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: &#8211; K A R A R &#8211; Dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olup daval\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye yap\u0131lan fazla \u00f6demenin sebepsiz zenginle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re dahili daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, reddi gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131n\u0131n in\u015faat\u0131 %30 seviyesine kadar yaparak i\u015fi terketti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen imal\u00e2t bedeli 33.060 &#8230;\u2019nun \u00f6dedi\u011fi 94.500 &#8230;\u2019dan mahsup edilerek fazla yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin istirdad\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 in\u015faat yap\u0131m\u0131 ile ilgili akd\u00ee ili\u015fkiyi kabul etmemekle birlikte &#8230; 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2006\/142 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 delil tespit dosyas\u0131nda vekilinin verdi\u011fi 24.07.2006 tarihli tespite itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131dan 98.500 &#8230; olan alaca\u011f\u0131ndan 94.500 &#8230;\u2019sunu tahsil &hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-13T20:59:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hukuki Haber.net\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-13T20:59:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\"},\"wordCount\":593,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Hukuki Haberler\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-13T20:59:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"description\":\"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg\",\"width\":1080,\"height\":1080,\"caption\":\"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822\",\"name\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ru-RU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Hukuki Haber.net\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/","og_locale":"ru_RU","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","og_description":"T.C. Yarg\u0131tay\u00a0 15. Hukuk Dairesi 2012\/7291 E., 2012\/7596 K. &#8220;\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni&#8221; Mahkemesi :Asliye Hukuk Hakimli\u011fi Yukar\u0131da tarih ve numaras\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015f ve dahili daval\u0131lar vekili taraf\u0131ndan duru\u015fma istenmi\u015f olmakla duru\u015fma i\u00e7in tayin edilen g\u00fcnde taraf vekilleri yap\u0131lan tebligata ra\u011fmen gelmediklerinden incelemenin evrak \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verildikten ve temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra dosyadaki ka\u011f\u0131tlar okundu i\u015fin gere\u011fi konu\u015fulup d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: &#8211; K A R A R &#8211; Dava, eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden kaynaklanm\u0131\u015f olup daval\u0131 y\u00fckleniciye yap\u0131lan fazla \u00f6demenin sebepsiz zenginle\u015fme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re tahsili istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen karar taraf vekillerince temyiz edilmi\u015ftir. 1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 delillerle yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re dahili daval\u0131lar\u0131n t\u00fcm, davac\u0131lar\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f, reddi gerekmi\u015ftir. 2-Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde daval\u0131n\u0131n in\u015faat\u0131 %30 seviyesine kadar yaparak i\u015fi terketti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen imal\u00e2t bedeli 33.060 &#8230;\u2019nun \u00f6dedi\u011fi 94.500 &#8230;\u2019dan mahsup edilerek fazla yap\u0131lan \u00f6demenin istirdad\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 in\u015faat yap\u0131m\u0131 ile ilgili akd\u00ee ili\u015fkiyi kabul etmemekle birlikte &#8230; 3. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nin 2006\/142 De\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 delil tespit dosyas\u0131nda vekilinin verdi\u011fi 24.07.2006 tarihli tespite itiraz dilek\u00e7esinde davac\u0131dan 98.500 &#8230; olan alaca\u011f\u0131ndan 94.500 &#8230;\u2019sunu tahsil &hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/","og_site_name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","article_published_time":"2025-04-13T20:59:00+00:00","author":"Hukuki Haber.net","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"\u041d\u0430\u043f\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043d\u043e \u0430\u0432\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u043c":"Hukuki Haber.net","\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u043d\u043e\u0435 \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043c\u044f \u0434\u043b\u044f \u0447\u0442\u0435\u043d\u0438\u044f":"3 \u043c\u0438\u043d\u0443\u0442\u044b"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/"},"author":{"name":"Hukuki Haber.net","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131","datePublished":"2025-04-13T20:59:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/"},"wordCount":593,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Hukuki Haberler"],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi'nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 - Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-04-13T20:59:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ru-RU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/hukukihaber\/yargitay-15-hukuk-dairesinin-2012-7291-e-2012-7596-k-sayili-karari\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay 15. Hukuk Dairesi&#8217;nin 2012\/7291 E. 2012\/7596 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","description":"Avukat Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l Antalya Barosu","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ru-RU"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#organization","name":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/siyah-logo-svg.svg","width":1080,"height":1080,"caption":"Av. Deniz Can K\u0131z\u0131l"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/001a271de994a0aa3f90eea084424822","name":"Hukuki Haber.net","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ru-RU","@id":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/57d8a49151495586611a149d29fc42865b951dc053a84709a3172ccb5abf3118?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Hukuki Haber.net"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.hukukihaber.net"],"url":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/author\/hukukihabernet\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/denizcankizil.tr\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}