“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
T.C.
\nD A N I \u015e T A Y
\n\u0130DAR\u0130 DAVA DA\u0130RELER\u0130 KURULU
\nEsas No : 2023\/554
\nKarar No : 2024\/2803<\/p>\n
TEMY\u0130Z EDEN (DAVACI) : …
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. …<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eI TARAF (DAVALI) : … Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131
\nVEK\u0130LLER\u0130 : Av. …, Av. …<\/p>\n
\u0130STEM\u0130N KONUSU : … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir.<\/p>\n
YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130 :<\/p>\n
Dava konusu istem: Daval\u0131 idare b\u00fcnyesinde gelir uzman\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken, Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 672 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname eki listesinde ismine yer verilmek suretiyle kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilmesi talebiyle Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonu’na yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun reddine ili\u015fkin … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmesi istenilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: … \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; davac\u0131n\u0131n “silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma” su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun ise ilgili istinaf dairesince hen\u00fcz karara ba\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan kararda davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya’daki hesap hareketliliklerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 ile uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, ara karara cevaben M\u00fcflis Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 A.\u015e. taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya sunulan CD’nin incelenmesinden; davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan hesap a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f tarihinin 06\/03\/2013 oldu\u011fu, hesab\u0131nda en son hesap hareketinin Ocak 2016 oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131ndan sonra ilk defa yeni bir hesap a\u00e7mad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ba\u015fka bankalardan t\u00fcketici kredisi kullanmak suretiyle an\u0131lan hesab\u0131na para yat\u0131rmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Bankasya’da bulunan hesaba para yat\u0131rma i\u015flemlerinin 29\/05\/2015 tarihi sonras\u0131nda, banka y\u00f6netimine TMSF taraf\u0131ndan el konulmas\u0131ndan sonra da devam etti\u011finin g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, \u00f6te yandan davac\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza mahkemesi karar\u0131nda da “s\u00f6z konusu Bank Asya hesap hareketlerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131 ile uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” \u015feklindeki de\u011ferlendirme sonucunda davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, mahkemelerince yap\u0131lan ara karara ra\u011fmen daval\u0131 idarece davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fcte irtibat veya iltisak\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyan ba\u015fkaca herhangi bir bilgi veya belgenin sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6rg\u00fct i\u00e7i ileti\u015fimde kullan\u0131lan bylock, eagle, cacao gibi programlar\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin herhangi bir verinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye m\u00fczahir dernek, sendika gibi herhangi bir sivil toplum kurulu\u015funda \u00fcyelik kayd\u0131n\u0131n da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, komisyon karar\u0131nda belirtilen Kimse Yok mu Derne\u011fi’ne para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi ve SMS yolu ile para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi bilgisinin ise salt \u00f6rg\u00fcte yard\u0131m maksad\u0131yla g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmeyece\u011fi ve bunun aksini ortaya koyan bilgi ve belgenin de daval\u0131 idarece dava dosyas\u0131na sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilmesi talebiyle Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonuna yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvurunun reddine dair i\u015flemde hukuki isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir.
\nB\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti : … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; dava dosyas\u0131 ve UYAP kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinden, … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile “…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda, Bank Asyay\u0131 faizsiz oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in birikimini burada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011fa ait Bank Asya hesaplar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin 2. talimat\u0131ndan sonra da 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bank Asyaya para yat\u0131rmaya devam etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hesap hareketlerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131 ile uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131…” gerek\u00e7esiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fcte bilerek ve isteyerek yard\u0131m etme kast\u0131n\u0131n her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak bir \u015fekilde tespit edilemedi\u011fi, b\u00f6ylece s\u00f6z konusu banka kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fcte yard\u0131m su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden aleyhe de\u011ferlendirilmedi\u011finin g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne yard\u0131m etti\u011finin kabul edilemeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k olmakla birlikte; idarece, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak Milli G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu’nca Devletin milli g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011funa karar verilen yap\u0131, olu\u015fum veya gruplar ile irtibat\u0131n\u0131n veya iltisak\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu itibarla davac\u0131n\u0131n talimat d\u00f6nemlerinde Bank Asya’ya para yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY ile iltisak ve irtibat\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu sonucuna var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, dava konusu komisyon karar\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye aidiyeti, iltisak\u0131 veya irtibat\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kapat\u0131lan Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fi’ne 01\/05\/2014-16\/12\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 1.285,00 TL tutar\u0131nda, ayr\u0131ca Ekim 2014-Nisan 2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda SMS yolu ile para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi bilgisinin bulundu\u011fu hususlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6-PDY ile irtibat\u0131n\u0131n\/iltisak\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na kanaat getirilmesine yeterli d\u00fczeyde verinin dosyada mevcut oldu\u011fu, dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolunda verilen \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda hukuki isabet bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131larak, istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fcne, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, 2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun de\u011fi\u015fik 45\/4.maddesi uyar\u0131nca yeniden yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daire karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: Dan\u0131\u015ftay Be\u015finci Dairesinin 14\/04\/2022 tarih ve E:2021\/5706, K:2022\/2215 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; UYAP kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve dava dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesinden, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ve kesinle\u015fen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 neticesinde, … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; “…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda, Bank Asyay\u0131 faizsiz oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in birikimini burada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011fa ait Bank Asya hesaplar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin 2. talimat\u0131ndan sonra da 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bank Asyaya para yat\u0131rmaya devam etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hesap hareketlerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131 ile uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131…” yolundaki tespitler ile davac\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; davac\u0131n\u0131n 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda … Bankas\u0131’nda \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flamas\u0131 \u00fczerine an\u0131lan bankada a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hesab\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, 2004 y\u0131l\u0131 itibar\u0131yla an\u0131lan banka hesap d\u00f6k\u00fcmlerinin incelenmesinden; gelir uzman\u0131 olarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan sonra da farkl\u0131 bankalardan maa\u015f almas\u0131na ra\u011fmen maa\u015f\u0131ndan arta kalan tutarlar\u0131n aylara sari olarak bu bankaya aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir \u00e7o\u011funun kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, bahsi ge\u00e7en tarihlerden hesab\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe kadar s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemlerin devam etti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fi’ne de an\u0131lan tarihten itibaren muhtelif tarihlerde yard\u0131m kapsam\u0131nda para g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, ki\u015fisel harcama ve kredi kart\u0131 \u00f6demelerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, 06\/03\/2013 tarihinde ise davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya Nuruosmaniye \u015fubesi nezdinde hesap a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyaya sunulan krokilerin incelenmesinden an\u0131lan \u015fubenin davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f yerine y\u00fcr\u00fcme mesafesinde oldu\u011funun sabit oldu\u011fu, bununla birlikte Bank Asya hesap hareketlerinin de yine … Bankas\u0131 hesap hareketleriyle uyumlu \u015fekilde maa\u015f\u0131ndan arta kalan tutarlar\u0131n aylar itibar\u0131yla vadesiz hesaba aktar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip genel itibarla kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131, dolar ve alt\u0131n hesaplar\u0131 nezdinde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, bir \u00e7ok kat\u0131l\u0131m hesab\u0131n\u0131n vadesinden \u00f6nce kapat\u0131lmak ve vadesiz hesab\u0131nda biriken paralar da eklenmek suretiyle yeniden a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve birbirinin devam\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, an\u0131lan bankan\u0131n TMSF’ye devir tarihinden sonra da bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerine devam etti\u011fi, hesap a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n ilk talimat tarihiyle uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frular \u015fekilde rutin olarak an\u0131lan hesaba tasarruf boyutunu a\u015fmayacak \u015fekilde para yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, s\u00f6z konusu bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerinin tasarruf amac\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc liderinin talimat\u0131 do\u011frultusunda \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ama\u00e7la yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair somut bir tespitin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fi’ne yap\u0131lan ba\u011f\u0131\u015flar\u0131n ise 2004 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren devam etti\u011fi, an\u0131lan yard\u0131mlar\u0131n insani duygular d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fcte mali destek sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair dava dosyas\u0131nda herhangi bir somut tespit bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 idarece davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda FET\u00d6\/PDY ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc ile irtibatl\u0131 ve iltisakl\u0131 oldu\u011funa dair ba\u015fkaca bir bilgi, belge de sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolundaki \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fcyle karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin temyize konu … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesi karar\u0131nda hukuki isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin … tarih ve E:…, K… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak, davan\u0131n reddi yolundaki ilk kararda \u0131srar edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
TEMY\u0130Z EDEN\u0130N \u0130DD\u0130ALARI : Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, banka hesap hareketlerinin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle hi\u00e7bir ili\u015fkisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, faiz konusunda hassasiyeti oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in birikimlerini ve maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131 faiz esas\u0131na g\u00f6re faaliyet g\u00f6steren bankalarda tutmamaya \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, Bank Asya’dan \u00f6nce uzun y\u0131llar boyunca … Bankas\u0131 ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 daval\u0131 idarenin, maa\u015f \u00f6demeleri i\u00e7in bir d\u00f6nem T\u00fcrkiye \u0130\u015f Bankas\u0131’yla, bir d\u00f6nem Garanti Bankas\u0131’yla, son d\u00f6nemde ise T\u00fcrkiye …lar Bankas\u0131 ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131; davac\u0131n\u0131n bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerinin neredeyse tamam\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 idarece ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en bankalar nezdinde a\u00e7t\u0131r\u0131lan maa\u015f hesaplar\u0131na her ay\u0131n 15’inde yatan maa\u015f\u0131n, bir veya iki g\u00fcn sonra (2013\/03 d\u00f6nemine kadar) T\u00fcrkiye Finans’a, 2013\/03 d\u00f6neminden sonra ise Bank Asya’ya aktar\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ibaret oldu\u011fu; i\u015f yerine \u00e7ok yak\u0131n bir noktada Bank Asya \u015fubesi a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bu bankaya ge\u00e7i\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye Finans Emin\u00f6n\u00fc\/Sultanhamam \u015eubesi ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde bu \u015fubenin hemen yak\u0131n\u0131nda Bank Asya’n\u0131n Sultanhamam \u015fubesinin de bulundu\u011fu halde 8 y\u0131ll\u0131k d\u00f6nem boyunca Bank Asya ile de\u011fil T\u00fcrkiye Finans’la \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131; geliri \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcnde hay\u0131r yapmaya \u00f6zen g\u00f6steren bir dindar oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n yard\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 kimi zaman sosyal \u00e7evresinde yard\u0131ma ihtiyac\u0131 olanlara, kimi zaman i\u015f yerlerinde kurum i\u00e7i yaz\u0131\u015fmalarla duyurulan yard\u0131m kampanyalar\u0131na, cuma namazlar\u0131 sonras\u0131 camilere, kimi zaman arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n organizasyonu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde \u00c7ocuk Esirgeme Kurumuna ve Do\u011fu T\u00fcrkistan T\u00fcrklerine yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fi’ne yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 yard\u0131mlar\u0131n da herhangi bir \u00f6rg\u00fcte finansal destek sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla ilgisinin olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131; ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla ba\u015flat\u0131lan ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 neticesinde beraat etti\u011fi ve bu karar\u0131n kesinle\u015fti\u011fi, B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan bu karar\u0131n dikkate al\u0131nmadan karar verilmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve temyize konu karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eI TARAFIN SAVUNMASI : Daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan, Tasarruf Mevduat\u0131 Sigorta Fonundan temin edilen bilgilerde; davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya’da 4025424 m\u00fc\u015fteri numaras\u0131 ile a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hesab\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu; bu hesaba 15\/04\/2014 tarihinde 2.722,00TL, 23\/01\/2015 tarihinde 2.743,00TL, 16\/02\/2015 tarihinde 4.778,00TL para yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 hesaba muhtelif tarihlerde farkl\u0131 tutarlarda para giri\u015fi oldu\u011fu; ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya’da 21\/07\/2014 tarihinde 3.901,00TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 01\/08\/2014 tarihinde 11.850,00TL tutarl\u0131 372 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 04\/09\/2014 tarihinde 11.650,00TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 16\/01\/2015 tarihinde 1.227,80TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 16\/02\/2015 tarihinde 3.578,33TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 16\/04\/2015 tarihinde 1.612,167L tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck kat\u0131l\u0131m hesab\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi; bu sebeple davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY ile iltisakl\u0131 finans kurulu\u015fu olan Bank Asya’da bulunan hesab\u0131na \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131 do\u011frultusunda finansal destek mahiyetinde para yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekti\u011fi; davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye iltisak\u0131 nedeniyle kapat\u0131lan Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fi’ne para yat\u0131rmak suretiyle bu \u00f6rg\u00fcte mali destek oldu\u011fu; bu deliller ba\u011flam\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n an\u0131lan ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle irtibat ve iltisak boyutunda bir ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn gerekti\u011fi, temyize konu \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ve usule uygun bulundu\u011fu, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan temyiz dilek\u00e7esinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen sebeplerin karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, istemin reddi gerekti\u011fi savunulmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
DANI\u015eTAY TETK\u0130K H\u00c2K\u0130M\u0130 …’\u0130N D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcNCES\u0130 : Davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fc ile Ankara B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesinin temyize konu \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA
\nKarar veren Dan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dari Dava Daireleri Kurulunca, Tetkik H\u00e2kiminin a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendikten ve dosyadaki belgeler incelendikten sonra dosya tekemm\u00fcl etti\u011finden y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 istemi hakk\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca bir karar verilmeksizin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
\u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E:
\nMADD\u0130 OLAY ve \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 MEVZUAT:<\/p>\n
T\u00fcrkiye’de 15 Temmuz 2016 gecesi, kendilerini \u201cYurtta Sulh Konseyi\u201d olarak isimlendiren bir grup T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri (TSK) mensubu taraf\u0131ndan, demokratik bi\u00e7imde halk taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6reve getirilen T\u00fcrkiye B\u00fcy\u00fck Millet Meclisini (TBMM), T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti H\u00fck\u00fbmetini ve Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131’n\u0131 devirmek ve anayasal d\u00fczeni ortadan kald\u0131rmak amac\u0131yla darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcnde bulunulmu\u015f, bu te\u015febb\u00fcs T\u00fcrk Milleti taraf\u0131ndan akamete u\u011frat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Anayasa’n\u0131n olay tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan 118. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca Milli G\u00fcvenlik Kurulu (MGK) taraf\u0131ndan 20\/07\/2016 tarihli toplant\u0131da yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmede, darbe te\u015febb\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn TSK i\u00e7indeki Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc (FET\u00d6) mensuplar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn kurulu\u015f a\u015famas\u0131ndan itibaren etkisi alt\u0131na ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 e\u011fitim kurulu\u015flar\u0131, sivil toplum kurulu\u015flar\u0131, medya kurulu\u015flar\u0131, ticari kurulu\u015flar ve kamu g\u00f6revlileri arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla Milleti ve Devleti kontrol alt\u0131nda tutmay\u0131 ama\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
MGK’n\u0131n an\u0131lan toplant\u0131s\u0131nda “demokrasinin, hukuk devleti ilkesinin, vatanda\u015flar\u0131n hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fcklerinin korunmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik tedbirlerin etkin bir \u015fekilde uygulanabilmesi amac\u0131yla” H\u00fck\u00fbmete ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l ilan edilmesi tavsiyesinde bulunulmas\u0131 hususu kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda toplanan Bakanlar Kurulu 20\/07\/2016 tarihinde, \u00fclke genelinde 21\/07\/2016 Per\u015fembe g\u00fcn\u00fc saat 01.00’den itibaren ge\u00e7erli olmak \u00fczere doksan g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2l ilan edilmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan karar 21\/07\/2016 tarih ve 29777 say\u0131l\u0131 Resm\u00ee Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmi\u015f ve ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn TBMM taraf\u0131ndan onaylanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
01\/09\/2016 tarih ve 29818 say\u0131l\u0131 (M\u00fckerrer) Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 672 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Kamu Personeline \u0130li\u015fkin Al\u0131nan Tedbirlere Dair Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname’nin ”Kamu Personellerine \u0130li\u015fkin Tedbirler” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 2. maddesinde: ”(1) Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine veya Milli G\u00fcvenlik Kurulunca Devletin milli g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011funa karar verilen yap\u0131, olu\u015fum veya gruplara \u00fcyeli\u011fi, mensubiyeti (Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin 24\/06\/2021 tarih ve E:2018\/81, K:2021\/45 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla 7086 say\u0131l\u0131 Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal Kapsam\u0131nda Baz\u0131 Tedbirler Al\u0131nmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararnamenin Kabul Edilmesine Dair Kanun’un 1. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde yer alan “…\u00fcyeli\u011fi, mensubiyeti veya…” ibaresinin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir.) veya iltisak\u0131 yahut bunlarla irtibat\u0131 olan; a) Ekli (1) say\u0131l\u0131 listede yer alan ki\u015filer kamu g\u00f6revinden, b) Ekli (2) say\u0131l\u0131 listede yer alan ki\u015filer Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc te\u015fkilat\u0131ndan, c) Ekli (3) say\u0131l\u0131 listede yer alan ki\u015filer Jandarma Genel Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 te\u015fkilat\u0131ndan, \u00e7) Ekli (4) say\u0131l\u0131 listede yer alan ki\u015filer Sahil G\u00fcvenlik Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 te\u015fkilat\u0131ndan, ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir i\u015fleme gerek kalmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu ki\u015filere ayr\u0131ca herhangi bir tebligat yap\u0131lmaz. Haklar\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca \u00f6zel kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re i\u015flem tesis edilir.” h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131, Gelir \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcnyesinde gelir uzman\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken, Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 672 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname eki listesinde ismine yer verilmek suretiyle kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilmesi talebiyle Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonu’na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flem ile reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bunun \u00fczerine, an\u0131lan karar\u0131n iptaline karar verilmesi istemiyle temyizen incelenen davay\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Di\u011fer yandan, davac\u0131n\u0131n ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcyelik su\u00e7undan, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanununun (CMK) 223\/2-e maddesi uyar\u0131nca beraatine karar verildi\u011fi ve an\u0131lan beraat karar\u0131n\u0131n temyiz edilmeden kesinle\u015fti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
HUKUK\u0130 DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME:<\/p>\n
672 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname uyar\u0131nca ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine veya MGK’ca Devletin mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011funa karar verilen yap\u0131, olu\u015fum veya gruplara iltisak\u0131 yahut bunlarla irtibat\u0131 oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilen kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin, \u201cmeslekten veya kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na” ili\u015fkin kararlar, adli su\u00e7 veya disiplin su\u00e7u i\u015flenmesi kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda uygulanan yapt\u0131r\u0131mlardan farkl\u0131 olarak ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011fu kabul edilen yap\u0131lar\u0131n kamu kurum ve kurulu\u015flar\u0131ndaki varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmay\u0131 ama\u00e7layan \u201cola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc tedbir” niteli\u011findedir.<\/p>\n
A\u0130HM “demokratik bir devletin, memurlar\u0131ndan anayasal prensiplere sadakat g\u00f6stermesini isteme hakk\u0131 bulundu\u011funu” belirtmektedir (Sidabras ve D\u017eiautas\/Litvanya, B. No: 55480\/00 ve 59330\/00, 27\/07\/2004, \u00a7 52; Volkmer\/Almanya (k.k.), B. No: 39799\/98, 22\/11\/2001; Petersen\/Almanya, B. No: 39793\/98, 22\/11\/2001). A\u0130HM’e g\u00f6re “kamu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131n\u0131n devlete sad\u0131k kalmalar\u0131 genel yarar\u0131 korumakla ve g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na almakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc devlet otoriteleri ile \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fas\u0131nda bulunan bir \u015fartt\u0131r.” (Sidabras ve D\u017eiautas\/Litvanya, B. No: 55480\/00 ve 59330\/00, 27\/07\/2004, \u00a7 57; \u017di\u010dkus\/Litvanya, B. No: 26652\/02, 07\/04\/2009, \u00a7 28).<\/p>\n
Ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenli\u011fe kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011fu kabul edilen yap\u0131lara iltisak veya bunlarla irtibat, kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin devlete sadakat y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yitirildi\u011fini ortaya koyan ve bahse konu ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren h\u00e2llerdir.<\/p>\n
Anayasa Mahkemesi 14\/11\/2019 tarih ve E:2018\/89, K:2019\/84 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda iltisakl\u0131 kavram\u0131n\u0131 ”kavu\u015fan, biti\u015fen, birle\u015fen”, irtibatl\u0131 kavram\u0131n\u0131 ise ”ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131” olarak tan\u0131mlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu kavramlar ile ki\u015filerin cezai sorumlulu\u011funu gerektiren \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcyelik ve mensubiyet kavramlar\u0131na nazaran ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile daha az yo\u011fun ve atipik bir ba\u011flant\u0131n\u0131n vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Bu kapsamda ki\u015filerin ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctleri ile irtibat ve iltisaklar\u0131n\u0131n ortaya konulabilmesi i\u00e7in, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn ama\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi ya da \u00f6rg\u00fctten yarar sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla gerek \u00f6rg\u00fctten gelen talimatlar do\u011frultusunda gerekse inisiyatif alarak bulunduklar\u0131 hal ve hareketler neticesinde \u00f6rg\u00fcte veya kendilerine yarar sa\u011flad\u0131klar\u0131 ya da \u00f6rg\u00fct ile ama\u00e7 birli\u011fi veya sosyal birliktelik g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7inde olduklar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kanaat olu\u015fmas\u0131 yeterli olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 idare taraf\u0131ndan dosyaya sunulan davac\u0131ya ili\u015fkin bilgi ve belgelere gelince;<\/p>\n
Dava konusu Komisyon karar\u0131nda; davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asyada 4025424 m\u00fc\u015fteri numaras\u0131 ile a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f hesab\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, mezkur hesaba 15\/04\/2014 tarihinde 2.722,00-TL, 23\/01\/2015 tarihinde 2.743,00-TL, 16\/02\/2015 tarihinde 4.778,00-TL para yat\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ayn\u0131 hesaba muhtelif tarihlerde farkl\u0131 tutarlarda para giri\u015fi oldu\u011fu, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asyada 21\/07\/2014 tarihinde 3.901,00 TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 01\/08\/2014 tarihinde 11.850,00 TL tutarl\u0131 372 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 04.09.2014 tarihinde 11.650,00 TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 16\/01\/2015 tarihinde 1.227,80 TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 16\/02\/2015 tarihinde 3.578,33 TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck, 16\/04\/2015 tarihinde 1.612,16 TL tutarl\u0131 31 g\u00fcnl\u00fck kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131; ayr\u0131ca, davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6\/PDY’ye aidiyeti, iltisak\u0131 veya irtibat\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle kapat\u0131lan Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fine 01\/05\/2014-16\/12\/2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda 1.285,00 TL tutar\u0131nda para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca Ekim 2014-Nisan 2015 tarihleri aras\u0131nda da SMS yolu ile para g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi tespitine yer verilmi\u015ftir.
\nDavac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda … Bankas\u0131’nda i\u015fe ba\u015flamas\u0131 \u00fczerine maa\u015f hesab\u0131n\u0131n bu bankada a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 8 ay sonra gelir uzman\u0131 olarak \u0130stanbul Vergi Dairesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 b\u00fcnyesinde gelir uzman\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, y\u0131llar boyunca ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 maa\u015f\u0131 faizsiz finans kurumu olmas\u0131 nedeniyle … Bankas\u0131’nda de\u011ferlendirdi\u011finin, her ay maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131 bu bankaya aktararak t\u00fcm i\u015flemlerini ve birikimini bu banka arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011finin ve 58 adet kat\u0131l\u0131m hesab\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011funun, daha sonra \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f yerine iki dakika y\u00fcr\u00fcme mesafesinde Bank Asya \u015fubesinin a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, i\u015f yerine \u00e7ok yak\u0131n olmas\u0131, i\u015flemlerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmek i\u00e7in kolayl\u0131kla gidebilecek olmas\u0131 ve bankan\u0131n da faizsiz finans kurumu olmas\u0131 nedeniyle … Bankas\u0131’ndaki hesab\u0131n\u0131 kapatmak suretiyle bu bankada hesap a\u00e7t\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, Bank Asya hesap hareketleri incelendi\u011finde, her ay ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131 di\u011fer bankada da oldu\u011fu \u015fekilde d\u00fczenli olarak Bank Asya m\u00fc\u015fteri hesab\u0131na aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, Bank Asya hesab\u0131ndaki parayla kredi kart\u0131 \u00f6demelerini yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, bu hesaptaki birikimlerini bir t\u00fcr yat\u0131r\u0131m hesab\u0131 olan kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131na aktararak de\u011ferlendirdi\u011finin, ayr\u0131ca ki\u015fisel bor\u00e7 al\u0131\u015f veri\u015flerinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, 14 Mart 2015’te ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen umre ibadetine ve Emlak Konuttan \u00e7\u0131kan daireye ili\u015fkin harcamalar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, bu nedenle an\u0131lan tarihlerden sonra \u00e7ok fazla birikim yapamay\u0131p bor\u00e7 \u00f6demelerini ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011finin, Bank Asya nezdindeki hesap hareketlerinin rutin bankac\u0131l\u0131k faaliyeti oldu\u011funun, \u00f6rg\u00fct talimat\u0131 ile ilgisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131n\u0131n silah ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin E:… esas\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davada, davac\u0131n\u0131n Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 hesaplar\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi \u00fczerine haz\u0131rlanan 27\/11\/2019 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; davac\u0131n\u0131n Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131ndaki ilk hesab\u0131 06\/03\/2013 tarihinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, 2013-2016 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131nda bulunan hesaplar\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131; davac\u0131n\u0131n 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda maa\u015f\u0131n\u0131n … Bankas\u0131 … nolu hesaba yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, maa\u015flar\u0131n yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten sonras\u0131nda Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 nezdindeki hesab\u0131na transfer etti\u011fi; davac\u0131n\u0131n 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n …bank’ta a\u00e7\u0131lan hesaba yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan maa\u015flar\u0131n yatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten sonras\u0131nda Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131ndaki hesab\u0131na transfer yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131; …bank hesab\u0131ndan Asya Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 hesab\u0131na 15\/07\/2016 tarihine kadar para transferi yap\u0131lmaya devam edildi\u011fi, tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131n\u0131n silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 ceza davas\u0131nda … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin … tarih ve K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; “Her ne kadar san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc eleba\u015f\u0131 Fettullah G\u00fclen’in talimat\u0131yla Bank Asya’ya para yat\u0131rarak \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011finden bahisle iddianame d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f ise de; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda, Bank Asya’y\u0131 faizsiz oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in birikimini burada yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011fa ait Bank Asya hesaplar\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin 2. talimat\u0131ndan sonra da 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bank Asya’ya para yat\u0131rmaya devam etti\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hesap hareketlerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin talimat\u0131 ile uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131…” gerek\u00e7esiyle beraatine karar verildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Yukar\u0131da aktar\u0131lan tespitler ile davac\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; davac\u0131n\u0131n 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda … Bankas\u0131’nda a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu banka hesab\u0131na ait d\u00f6k\u00fcmlerin incelenmesinden; gelir uzman\u0131 olarak g\u00f6reve ba\u015flamas\u0131ndan sonra da farkl\u0131 bankalardan maa\u015f almas\u0131na ra\u011fmen maa\u015f\u0131ndan arta kalan tutarlar\u0131n aylara sari olarak bu bankaya aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bir \u00e7o\u011funun kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, bahsi ge\u00e7en tarihlerden hesab\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihe kadar s\u00f6z konusu i\u015flemlerin devam etti\u011fi, ki\u015fisel harcama ve kredi kart\u0131 \u00f6demelerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, 06\/03\/2013 tarihinde ise davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya Nuruosmaniye \u015fubesi nezdinde hesap a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, dosyaya sunulan krokilerin incelenmesinden an\u0131lan \u015fubenin davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f yerine y\u00fcr\u00fcme mesafesinde oldu\u011funun sabit oldu\u011fu, bununla birlikte Bank Asya hesap hareketlerinin de yine … Bankas\u0131 hesap hareketleriyle uyumlu \u015fekilde maa\u015f\u0131ndan arta kalan tutarlar\u0131n aylar itibar\u0131yla vadesiz hesaba aktar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fcteakip genel itibarla kat\u0131l\u0131m hesaplar\u0131, dolar ve alt\u0131n hesaplar\u0131 nezdinde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi, bir \u00e7ok kat\u0131l\u0131m hesab\u0131n\u0131n vadesinden \u00f6nce kapat\u0131lmak ve vadesiz hesab\u0131nda biriken paralar da eklenmek suretiyle yeniden a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve birbirinin devam\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, an\u0131lan bankan\u0131n TMSF’ye devir tarihinden sonra da bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerine devam etti\u011fi, hesap a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n ilk talimat tarihiyle uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frular \u015fekilde rutin olarak an\u0131lan hesaba tasarruf boyutunu a\u015fmayacak \u015fekilde para yat\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, s\u00f6z konusu bankac\u0131l\u0131k i\u015flemlerinin tasarruf amac\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc liderinin talimat\u0131 do\u011frultusunda \u00f6rg\u00fctsel ama\u00e7la yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair somut bir tespitin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya’da ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fi hesap hareketleri dolay\u0131s\u0131yla FET\u00d6\/PDY silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcyle irtibatl\u0131 ve iltisakl\u0131 oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u00d6te yandan, davac\u0131n\u0131n Kimse Yok Mu Derne\u011fi’ne 2004 y\u0131l\u0131ndan itibaren muhtelif tarihlerde yard\u0131m kapsam\u0131nda para g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, ancak an\u0131lan yard\u0131mlar\u0131n insani duygular d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u00f6rg\u00fcte mali destek sa\u011flamak amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair dava dosyas\u0131nda herhangi bir somut tespit bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, an\u0131lan hususun davac\u0131n\u0131n iltisak\u0131 veya irtibat\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyacak yeterlilikte ve nitelikte bir delil olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Dosyada bulunan bilgi ve belgeler ile yukar\u0131da yer verilen a\u00e7\u0131klamalar bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, daval\u0131 idarece bak\u0131lmakta olan dosyada davac\u0131n\u0131n ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fctlerine veya Milli G\u00fcvenlik Kurulunca Devletin milli g\u00fcvenli\u011fine kar\u015f\u0131 faaliyette bulundu\u011funa karar verilen yap\u0131, olu\u015fum veya gruplarla iltisak\u0131 yahut bunlarla irtibat\u0131 oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin yeterli delil sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sunulan delillerin ise davac\u0131n\u0131n iltisak\u0131 veya irtibat\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyacak yeterlilikte ve nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca dosya kapsam\u0131nda davac\u0131n\u0131n iltisak\u0131n\u0131 ve\/veya irtibat\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koyan nitelikte herhangi bir bilgi ve belgenin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n FET\u00d6 ile iltisak ve irtibat\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla, temyize konu B\u00f6lge Mahkemesinin \u0131srar karar\u0131nda hukuki isabet bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
KARAR SONUCU:
\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin kabul\u00fcne;<\/p>\n
2. Dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali yolundaki … \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak yap\u0131lan istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun yukar\u0131da \u00f6zetlenen gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fc, karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131, davan\u0131n reddi yolundaki … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin temyize konu … tarih ve E:…, K:.. say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
3. Yeniden bir karar verilmek \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi …. \u0130dare Dava Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 13\/11\/2024 tarihinde kesin olarak oy\u00e7oklu\u011fu ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n
KAR\u015eI OY
\nX-Temyiz edilen kararla ilgili dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinden; … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin temyize konu … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n, usul ve hukuka uygun bulundu\u011fu, dilek\u00e7ede ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen temyiz nedenlerinin karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirecek nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz isteminin reddi ile \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi oyuyla, karara kat\u0131lm\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n
\u200bDan\u0131\u015ftay \u0130dare Dava Daireleri Kurulu’nun 13\/11\/2024 tarihli 2023\/554 E., 2024\/2803 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” T.C. D A N I \u015e T A Y \u0130DAR\u0130 DAVA DA\u0130RELER\u0130 KURULU Esas No : 2023\/554 Karar No : 2024\/2803 TEMY\u0130Z EDEN (DAVACI) : … VEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. … KAR\u015eI TARAF (DAVALI) : … Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 VEK\u0130LLER\u0130 : Av. …, Av. … \u0130STEM\u0130N KONUSU : … B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi … \u0130dari Dava Dairesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 \u0131srar karar\u0131n\u0131n temyizen incelenerek bozulmas\u0131 istenilmektedir. YARGILAMA S\u00dcREC\u0130 : Dava konusu istem: Daval\u0131 idare b\u00fcnyesinde gelir uzman\u0131 olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken, Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 672 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname eki listesinde ismine yer verilmek suretiyle kamu g\u00f6revinden \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan, kamu g\u00f6revine iade edilmesi talebiyle Ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc Hal \u0130\u015flemleri \u0130nceleme Komisyonu’na yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun reddine ili\u015fkin … tarih ve … say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmesi istenilmi\u015ftir. \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zeti: … \u0130dare Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla; davac\u0131n\u0131n “silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma” su\u00e7lamas\u0131yla yarg\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada … A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin … tarih ve E:…, K:… say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131yla hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verildi\u011fi, s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istemiyle yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun ise ilgili istinaf dairesince hen\u00fcz karara ba\u011flanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, an\u0131lan kararda davac\u0131n\u0131n Bank Asya’daki hesap hareketliliklerinin \u00f6rg\u00fct liderinin \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 ile uyumlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, ara karara cevaben M\u00fcflis Asya …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n