T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
Ceza Genel Kurulu<\/p>\n
2022\/198 E., 2024\/100 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
D\u0130RENME
\nKARARI VEREN
\nYARGITAY DA\u0130RES\u0130 : 1. Ceza Dairesi
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza
\nSAYISI : 299-328<\/p>\n
I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7<\/p>\n
San\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 82\/1-d, 62\/1, 53, 63, 58\/6-7 ve 54\/1. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunlu\u011funa, cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine, mahsuba ve m\u00fcsadereye ili\u015fkin Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 18.07.2012 tarihli ve 262-173 say\u0131l\u0131 resen temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 27.11.2013 tarih ve 3133-6947 say\u0131 ile; “Mahkemece yap\u0131lan 14.06.2012 tarihli ke\u015ffin ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunun su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde yetersiz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; olay yerinde san\u0131k ve tan\u0131klar ile silahtan anlayan uzman bilirki\u015fi ile adli t\u0131p uzman\u0131 bilirki\u015finin haz\u0131r bulundurularak, manken ki\u015filer de kullan\u0131lmak suretiyle uygulamal\u0131 ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131, adli muayene ve otopsi tutana\u011f\u0131, olay yeri krokisi, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6len\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu yer, konumu, isabet alan v\u00fccut b\u00f6lgesi, at\u0131\u015f mesafesi de\u011ferlendirilmek suretiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu denetlendikten sonra, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeksizin eksik soru\u015fturma sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,” isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bozmaya uyan Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 21.05.2014 tarih ve 2-136 say\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Resen temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 27.12.2016 tarih ve 6041-4386 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>\n
“1- Yarg\u0131lama dosyas\u0131, olayda kullan\u0131lan av t\u00fcfe\u011fi ve san\u0131k ile \u00f6lenin ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olan ve yarg\u0131lamada tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen …’\u0131n Adli T\u0131p Kurumu<\/p>\n
1. \u0130htisas ve Fizik \u0130htisas Dairelerinde birlikte haz\u0131r edilerek, …’\u0131n su\u00e7 tarihi itibar\u0131yla boy ve kilo \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcleri de dikkate al\u0131narak fiziksel \u00f6zellikleri itibar\u0131yla eylemde kullan\u0131lan av t\u00fcfe\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131y\u0131p ta\u015f\u0131yamayaca\u011f\u0131, av t\u00fcfe\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131yabilecek \u00f6zellikleri tespit edilmesi h\u00e2linde ise; yine tespit edilen fiziksel \u00f6zellikleri itibar\u0131yla av t\u00fcfe\u011finin teti\u011fine gerekli bas\u0131nc\u0131 uygulay\u0131p ate\u015f edip edemeyece\u011finin tespiti, …’\u0131n av t\u00fcfe\u011fiyle ate\u015f edebilece\u011finin tespiti h\u00e2linde ise yine su\u00e7 tarihindeki ya\u015f\u0131 ve fiziksel \u00f6zellikleri itibar\u0131yla av t\u00fcfe\u011finin geri tepmesi sonucu an\u0131lan\u0131n v\u00fccudunda ekimoz olu\u015fup olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, at\u0131\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda patlayan av t\u00fcfe\u011finin dip\u00e7i\u011finin yere yak\u0131n olmas\u0131 durumunda ise, dip\u00e7ikte bir hasar olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131, hususlar\u0131n\u0131n elde edilecek bilimsel verilerden hareketle denetlenmesi sonucu an\u0131lan dairelerden raporlar al\u0131nmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
2- San\u0131k … ve \u00f6len …’n\u0131n ortak \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 olan ve mahkemede tan\u0131k olarak dinlenen … ile …’\u0131n CMK’n\u0131n 45\/2. maddesindeki d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re; tan\u0131kl\u0131ktan \u00e7ekinip \u00e7ekinmeyecekleri konusunda karar verecek tarafs\u0131z bir kanuni temsilci atanmas\u0131 sa\u011flanarak, kanuni temsilcinin r\u0131zas\u0131na g\u00f6re hukuki durumun tayini gerekti\u011fi hususunda zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n
3- Tan\u0131k …’\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n adliyede silahla ate\u015f ederek, g\u00f6revli polislere kar\u015f\u0131 silahla tehdit su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine ili\u015fkin yarg\u0131lama dosyas\u0131n\u0131n incelenip onayl\u0131 bir \u00f6rne\u011finin dosya aras\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmemesi,” isabetsizliklerinden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Bozmaya uyan Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince 09.10.2018 tarih ve 19-680 say\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Resen temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 03.12.2019 tarih, 3177-5299 say\u0131 ve oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile onanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Daire Ba\u015fkan\u0131 A. Alt\u0131nkaya ve Daire \u00dcyesi …; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 83. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmenin ihmali davran\u0131\u015fla i\u015flenmesi su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 04.05.2020 tarih ve 101589 say\u0131 ile; “San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, e\u015fini kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kan\u0131tlanamam\u0131\u015f ise de, dolu ve at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r t\u00fcfe\u011fin i\u015f yerinde alelade duvara dayal\u0131 h\u00e2lde tutularak 4-5 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki \u00e7ocu\u011fun t\u00fcfekle oynamas\u0131na f\u0131rsat vermek ve tetik k\u0131sm\u0131ndan \u00e7ocuk taraf\u0131ndan eline al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f alabilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2lde ani bir m\u00fcdahale ile t\u00fcfe\u011fin patlamas\u0131na neden olmak suretiyle bilin\u00e7li taksirle hareket etti\u011fi,\u201d g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
\u0130tiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 05.10.2020 tarih, 1980-2148 say\u0131 ve oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla; itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 09.10.2018 tarih ve 19-680 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn;<\/p>\n
“Olu\u015fa ve t\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, su\u00e7 tarihinde san\u0131k …’\u0131n Ali\u015f Rent a Car isimli i\u015f yerini i\u015fletti\u011fi, sabah saatlerinde kimli\u011fi dosya kapsam\u0131nda belli olmayan bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f yeri \u00f6n\u00fcndeki dubalar\u0131n y\u0131k\u0131larak arac\u0131n park edildi\u011fi, … ile \u015fah\u0131s aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, tart\u0131\u015fma sonras\u0131nda …’\u0131n i\u015f yeri asma kat\u0131nda bulunan av t\u00fcfe\u011fini alt katta bulunan mutfak tezg\u00e2h\u0131na dayad\u0131\u011f\u0131, birka\u00e7 saat sonra \u00f6\u011fle s\u0131ralar\u0131nda \u00f6len …, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 … ve su\u00e7 tarihinde 4 ya\u015f\u0131nda olan …’\u0131n i\u015f yerine geldikleri, \u00f6len …’\u0131n tuvalete girdi\u011fi, hemen arkas\u0131nda mutfak tezg\u00e2h\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda bulunan t\u00fcfe\u011fi …’\u0131n alarak tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131na do\u011frulttu\u011fu, san\u0131k …’\u0131n bu durumu g\u00f6rmesi \u00fczerine …’\u0131n elinde bulunan t\u00fcfe\u011fe hamle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve sonras\u0131nda t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ate\u015f neticesinde kap\u0131 arkas\u0131nda tuvalette ayakta bulunan \u00f6len …’\u0131n g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcnden yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve av t\u00fcfe\u011fi sa\u00e7ma tanesi yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 akci\u011fer ve b\u00fcy\u00fck damar harabiyeti neticesinde i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f kanama sonucu hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi olayda;<\/p>\n
San\u0131k …’\u0131n dolu ve at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r h\u00e2lde bulunan av t\u00fcfe\u011fini i\u015f yeri i\u00e7erisinde a\u00e7\u0131k ve herkesin g\u00f6rebilece\u011fi bir yere b\u0131rakmas\u0131 sonucu, 4 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki …’\u0131n t\u00fcfekle oynamak suretiyle ate\u015f etmesine f\u0131rsat vererek \u00f6len\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011fu eylemi, neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ancak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini istemedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle adam \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan ceza verilmesi,” isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015f;<\/p>\n
Daire \u00dcyeleri M. \u00dcst\u00fcner ve \u0130. Temir itiraz\u0131n reddedilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
II. D\u0130RENME GEREK\u00c7ES\u0130<\/p>\n
Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi ise 10.12.2020 tarih ve 299-328 say\u0131 ile; “(\u2026) Olay g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131\u011f\u0131n; sosyal yard\u0131mla\u015fmadan yard\u0131m almak i\u00e7in o\u011fullar\u0131 … ve … ile \u00e7ar\u015f\u0131 merkezine gelen ve oradan da san\u0131k olan e\u015finin i\u015f yerine gelerek \u00f6\u011flen sonras\u0131n\u0131 beklemekte olan \u00f6lenenin i\u015f yerinin arka taraf\u0131nda bulunan tuvalete girmesi sonras\u0131nda, tespit edilemeyen bir nedenden dolay\u0131 e\u015fini \u00f6ld\u00fcrmeye karar verdi\u011fi, bu karar\u0131n\u0131 da kaza s\u00fcs\u00fc vererek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6neldi\u011fi ve o\u011flu … bilgisayarla u\u011fra\u015f\u0131rken 4 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki o\u011flu …\u2019e daha \u00f6nceden getirerek haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 mekanik ar\u0131zas\u0131 olmayan yar\u0131 otomatik t\u00fcfe\u011fi tutturup bu \u015fekilde kuca\u011f\u0131na alarak giyinik olarak ayakta durdu\u011fu i\u00e7in yanan tuvalet lambas\u0131 nedeniyle tuvaletin buzlu cam\u0131ndan sil\u00fcetini g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc e\u015finin isabet ihtimali en y\u00fcksek olan en geni\u015f ve en \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc b\u00f6lgesi olan g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 hedef alarak t\u00fcfe\u011fi do\u011frultup o\u011flu …\u2019in elini teti\u011fe g\u00f6t\u00fcrmesini sa\u011flay\u0131p \u2018S\u0131k\u2019 diye talimat verdi\u011fi, …\u2019in de teti\u011fe dokunmas\u0131yla pompal\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00f6lenenin g\u00f6\u011fs\u00fcnden vurularak \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve olay\u0131n bu \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi vicdani kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, tan\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda al\u0131nan adli t\u0131p raporu mahkememiz karar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011fi\u015ftirmemi\u015f, bu suretle; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131na g\u00f6re resm\u00ee nik\u00e2hl\u0131 e\u015fi olan \u00f6lene …\u2019\u0131 kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmekten eylemine uyan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 82\/1-d maddesi gere\u011fince a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n duru\u015fmadaki iyi h\u00e2li nedeniyle yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 lehine takdiri indirim nedeni say\u0131larak cezas\u0131n\u0131n TCK\u2019n\u0131n 62\/1 maddesi gere\u011fince m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na indirilmesine karar verilmi\u015f, Yarg\u0131tay ilgili dairesinin olay\u0131n vukuu \u015fekli, kabul ve s\u00fcbut y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki de\u011ferlendirmesine kat\u0131lmak m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki gerek\u00e7eyle bozmaya direnerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6nceki h\u00fck\u00fcm gibi cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Resen temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafii ile Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 30.11.2021 tarihli ve 9128 say\u0131l\u0131 bozma istekli tebli\u011fnamesi ile dosya, 6763 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 36. maddesi ile de\u011fi\u015fik 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 307. maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar\u0131na direnilen daireye g\u00f6nderilmi\u015f, ayn\u0131 madde uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 28.02.2022 tarih, 13190-1538 say\u0131 ve oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla direnme karar\u0131n\u0131n yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesi \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f, a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
III. UYU\u015eMAZLIK KONUSU<\/p>\n
\u00d6zel Daire \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fu ile Yerel Mahkeme aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu mu yoksa bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma su\u00e7unu mu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OGULAR<\/p>\n
\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;<\/p>\n
Olay yeri tespit tutana\u011f\u0131nda; 12.09.2011 tarihinde saat 13.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda Malatya il merkezi, Halfettin Mahallesi, Adliye Saray\u0131 2. Sokak\u2019ta bulunan Ali\u015f Rent a Car isimli i\u015f yerinde ate\u015fli silahla \u00f6l\u00fcm olay\u0131 meydana geldi\u011finin bildirilmesi \u00fczerine olay yerine gidildi\u011fi, \u00f6len\u00fcn tuvalette bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada kap\u0131dan ate\u015f edildi\u011fi, kap\u0131daki deli\u011fin tuvalet i\u00e7erisinden 117 cm y\u00fckseklikte bulundu\u011fu, olay yerinde bir adet av t\u00fcfe\u011fi k\u0131l\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n duvarda as\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu ve as\u0131l\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fin hen\u00fcz k\u0131l\u0131f\u0131ndan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 izlenimi verildi\u011fi tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
13.09.2011 tarihli adli muayene ve otopsi tutana\u011f\u0131nda; 35-40 ya\u015flar\u0131nda, 158 cm boyunda, 65-75 kg a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki kad\u0131n cesedinde, her iki \u00f6n kol i\u00e7 yanda \u00e7ok say\u0131da birbirine paralel psikopatik eski yara nedbeleri oldu\u011fu, y\u00fczde \u00e7ok say\u0131da en b\u00fcy\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 0,5 cm b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde s\u0131yr\u0131k izi bulundu\u011fu, sa\u011f g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs kafesi \u00f6n y\u00fczde 1, 2, 3 ve 4. kaburgalar\u0131 6×6 cm \u00e7ap\u0131nda, etraf\u0131nda satelit giri\u015fler olan av t\u00fcfe\u011fi sa\u00e7ma tanesi toplu giri\u015f yaras\u0131 oldu\u011fu, sa\u011f 1 ve 4. kaburgalar aras\u0131 \u00f6nden, 2 ve 7. aral\u0131ktaki kaburgalar\u0131n omurgaya yak\u0131n yerden av t\u00fcfe\u011fi sa\u00e7ma tanesi yaralanmas\u0131 sonucu k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, kalp k\u00f6k\u00fcndeki damarlarda ve sa\u011f akci\u011fer orta lobda daha fazla olmak \u00fczere her iki akci\u011ferde yayg\u0131n sa\u00e7ma yaralar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, mesanenin dolu oldu\u011fu, ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn av t\u00fcfe\u011fi sa\u00e7ma tanesi yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 akci\u011fer, b\u00fcy\u00fck damar yaralanmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f kanama neticesinde meydana geldi\u011fi, \u015fahsa bir adet at\u0131\u015f\u0131n isabet etti\u011fi, bu at\u0131\u015f\u0131n \u00f6ld\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc nitelikte oldu\u011fu, at\u0131\u015f mesafesinin, at\u0131\u015f\u0131n giysili b\u00f6lgeye denk gelmesi nedeni ile cilt bulgular\u0131na g\u00f6re yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Malatya Adli T\u0131p Grup Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kimyasal Tahliller \u0130htisas Dairesince d\u00fczenlenen 17.10.20211 tarihli raporda; \u00f6lenin kan ve idrar \u00f6rnekleri \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan incelemede sistematiklerindeki uyar\u0131c\u0131-uyutucu-uyu\u015fturucu maddelerin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
20.10.2011 tarihli uzmanl\u0131k raporunda; san\u0131k …\u2019a ait sa\u011f ve sol avu\u00e7 i\u00e7i svaplar\u0131, sa\u011f ve sol el \u00fcst\u00fc svaplar\u0131 ile san\u0131\u011fa ait pantolondan al\u0131nan svapta at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011fa ait g\u00f6mlek svab\u0131nda at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131k …\u2019a ait sa\u011f el avu\u00e7 i\u00e7i svab\u0131nda at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, sol el avu\u00e7 i\u00e7i, sa\u011f ve sol el \u00fcst\u00fc svaplar\u0131 ile g\u00f6mlek, \u015fort ve atletten olu\u015fan giysilerinde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6lene ve tan\u0131k …\u2019a ait her iki avu\u00e7 i\u00e7i ve el \u00fcst\u00fc svaplarda at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6lene ait penyenin \u00fcst orta b\u00f6lgesinde bir adet b\u00fcy\u00fck delik ile etraf\u0131nda k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck delikler tespit edildi\u011fi, delikler etraf\u0131ndaki at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 yo\u011funlu\u011funa g\u00f6re at\u0131\u015f\u0131n yak\u0131n at\u0131\u015f mesafesinden yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Diyarbak\u0131r Olay Yeri \u0130nceleme ve Kriminal Kimlik Tespit \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce d\u00fczenlenen 27.09.2011 tarihli uzmanl\u0131k raporunda; av t\u00fcfe\u011fi \u00fczerinde herhangi bir v\u00fccut izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
27.10.2011 tarihli uzmanl\u0131k raporunda; incelenmek \u00fczere g\u00f6nderilen 57302 seri numaral\u0131, 12 numara av fi\u015fe\u011fi atan, yivsiz, setsiz, tek namlulu, fi\u015fek hazneli yar\u0131 otomatik av t\u00fcfe\u011finin at\u0131\u015fa engel mekanik bir ar\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6nderilen bir adet bo\u015f kartu\u015fun incelemeye konu av t\u00fcfe\u011finden ate\u015flenmi\u015f oldu\u011fu, tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 par\u00e7as\u0131 \u00fczerindeki deli\u011fin etraf\u0131ndaki at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m yo\u011funlu\u011funa g\u00f6re at\u0131\u015f\u0131n yak\u0131n at\u0131\u015f mesafesinden yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu, kap\u0131daki kopman\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle at\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 belirlemenin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,
\n14.06.2012 tarihinde mahkemece ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ke\u015fif i\u015flemi sonras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 17.06.2012 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; ke\u015fif yap\u0131lan yerin \u00fc\u00e7 katl\u0131 binan\u0131n giri\u015f kat\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, asma katl\u0131 ve arkada tuvaleti bulunan iki b\u00f6l\u00fcmden olu\u015ftu\u011fu, t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilen yer ile tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131nda 165 cm mesafe bulundu\u011fu, tan\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n boyunun 100 cm oldu\u011fu, tan\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda bulundu\u011funu belirtti\u011fi \u00f6n k\u0131s\u0131mdan olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi yerin rahatl\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fclebildi\u011fi, t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 zeminin tuvaletin i\u00e7 zemininden 9 cm y\u00fcksekte oldu\u011fu, tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131ndaki isabet noktas\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131n\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yerden 108 cm, tuvaletin i\u00e7inde yerden 117 cm oldu\u011fu bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
11.03.2014 tarihinde mahkemece ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ke\u015fif i\u015flemi sonras\u0131nda adli t\u0131p uzman\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen 02.04.2014 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; “1- Malatya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 12.09.2011 tarihli adli muayene ve otopsi tutana\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin incelenmesinde, \u00f6len\u00fcn boyunun 158 cm, av t\u00fcfe\u011fi sa\u00e7ma taneleri giri\u015f yaras\u0131n\u0131n 6×6 cm belirtildi\u011fi, giri\u015f yaras\u0131 \u00fcst k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131n tepe noktas\u0131na 31-33 cm, giri\u015f yaras\u0131 alt k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ayak topu\u011funa 120-121 cm uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda oldu\u011funun de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi (Olay yerinin yeniden yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131nda yukar\u0131daki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmlerin yan\u0131nda ki\u015finin olay an\u0131nda giydi\u011fi 8,5 cm olan terli\u011fin topuk mesafesinin de g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131) Malatya Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 12.09.2011 tarihli adli muayene ve otopsi tutana\u011f\u0131nda \u2018Yaran\u0131n ortas\u0131n\u0131n topuktan 149 cm yukar\u0131da oldu\u011fu\u2019nun belirtildi\u011fi ancak ki\u015finin boyu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde bunun sehven yaz\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n
2- Sa\u00e7malar\u0131n v\u00fccutta olu\u015fturdu\u011fu yaralanmalar ve takip etti\u011fi yara yollar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ki\u015finin at\u0131\u015f an\u0131nda \u00f6ne e\u011filmi\u015f olabilece\u011fi gibi at\u0131\u015f\u0131n yukar\u0131dan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olabilece\u011fi ancak PVC kap\u0131 \u00fczerindeki kakmalar ve dosya i\u00e7eri\u011findeki ifadelerde ki\u015finin kot pantolonunun beline kadar \u00e7ekik oldu\u011fu ve sadece \u00fcst d\u00fc\u011fmesinin a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda ki\u015finin at\u0131\u015f esnas\u0131nda ayakta ve hafif e\u011filmi\u015f pozisyonda bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n daha muhtemel oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
3- Diyarbak\u0131r Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131 M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce yap\u0131lan incelemede PVC kap\u0131da giri\u015f deli\u011fi etraf\u0131nda at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanmas\u0131n\u0131n olay an\u0131nda silah\u0131n namlusunun kap\u0131dan uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n en fazla 1 metre olabilece\u011fi,<\/p>\n
4- Diyarbak\u0131r Kriminal Polis Laboratuvar\u0131 M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnce yap\u0131lan incelemede …’ta, her iki el i\u00e7i ve el \u00fcst\u00fcnde ve pantolonda tespit edilen at\u0131\u015f art\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015finin at\u0131\u015f an\u0131nda silahla ayn\u0131 ortamda bulundu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fi, uzun namlulu silahlarda namlu ucuna yak\u0131n olman\u0131n at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na maruziyeti artt\u0131raca\u011f\u0131, ilgili raporda y\u00f6ntem olarak atomik absorbsiyon spektrofotometrisi belirtildi\u011fi ancak tespit edilen a\u011f\u0131r metallerin belirtilmedi\u011fi, at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan a\u011f\u0131r metallerin ba\u015fka \u015fekillerde de bula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu,<\/p>\n
5- …’ta sa\u011f el i\u00e7inde tespit edilen at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015finin at\u0131\u015f an\u0131nda silahla ayn\u0131 ortamda bulundu\u011fu veya olay \u00f6ncesi ya da sonras\u0131nda \u00fczerinde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunan silaha avu\u00e7 i\u00e7i ile dokundu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelece\u011fi, el \u00fcstlerinde ve sol el avu\u00e7 i\u00e7inde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 saptanmamas\u0131n\u0131n at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyece\u011fi, olay sonras\u0131 el y\u0131kama, g\u00f6zya\u015f\u0131 silme veya ba\u015fka mekanik etkilerle at\u0131\u015f art\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n kaybolabilece\u011fi, analiz kaynakl\u0131 nedenlerle de at\u0131\u015f art\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n bulunamayabilece\u011fi” tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
18.03.2014 havale tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; tuvalet giri\u015f kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n, \u00fcst taraf\u0131 kahverengi buzlu cam tak\u0131l\u0131 plastik bir kap\u0131 oldu\u011fu, cam k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flam oldu\u011fu, sa\u00e7malar\u0131n isabet etti\u011fi plastik orta k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n olaydan sonra inceleme yap\u0131lmak i\u00e7in kesilmek suretiyle \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n isabet alan k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n yerden y\u00fcksekli\u011finin \u00f6nceki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re d\u0131\u015ftan 108 cm, i\u00e7ten 117 cm oldu\u011fu ve tuvalet zemininin t\u00fcfe\u011fin patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yer zemininden 9 cm derin oldu\u011fu, tuvalet i\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n 90×102 cm geni\u015fli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, san\u0131k ve tan\u0131k beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 ile t\u00fcfe\u011fin patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerin aras\u0131nda 165 cm mesafe bulundu\u011fu, t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerden, isabet etti\u011fi tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 ve \u00f6len aras\u0131nda olu\u015fabilecek sapma a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n kriminolog uzman taraf\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilerek hesaplanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
14.04.2014 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunda; ” (..) \u00f6len \u00fczerindeki isabet alan yer, olay an\u0131nda \u00f6len\u00fcn aya\u011f\u0131nda bulunan 8,5 cm topuk y\u00fcksekli\u011fine sahip terlik boyu da d\u00e2hil edilerek at\u0131\u015f\u0131n v\u00fccuda isabet ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerin zeminden 128,5 cm y\u00fcksekte oldu\u011fu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc. Bu h\u00e2liyle ayak mesafesinin tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131na uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 40 cm olarak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc, v\u00fccutta olu\u015fan giri\u015f yaras\u0131n\u0131n 6×6 cm \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fclerinde oldu\u011fu da g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak konu mankeni belden kap\u0131ya do\u011fru e\u011fildi. Giri\u015f yaras\u0131n\u0131n kap\u0131 PVC b\u00f6lme \u00fczerindeki giri\u015f deli\u011fine uzakl\u0131\u011f\u0131 35 cm olarak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc. Tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerindeki PVC k\u0131s\u0131m \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131larak ve belirtildi\u011fi gibi konu mankeni kap\u0131ya do\u011fru belden e\u011filerek \u00f6len\u00fcn isabet ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 andaki muhtemel pozisyonu tespite \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Mankenin konumu, v\u00fccudu \u00fczerindeki giri\u015f yaras\u0131 ve kap\u0131 \u00fczerindeki giri\u015f deli\u011fi hesaplanarak at\u0131\u015f tayin kiti kuruldu. At\u0131\u015f tayin kiti \u00fczerine konumland\u0131r\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7erin 15 derecelik a\u00e7\u0131y\u0131 g\u00f6sterdi\u011fi, A noktas\u0131nda bulundu\u011funu varsayd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z yakla\u015f\u0131k boy uzunlu\u011fu 160-165 cm olan \u015fahs\u0131n tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131na 70 cm mesafeden 80 cm bel y\u00fcksekli\u011finden 15 derecelik a\u00e7\u0131yla at\u0131\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fi, yine B noktas\u0131nda bulundu\u011funu varsayd\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z yakla\u015f\u0131k boy uzunlu\u011fu 100 cm olan \u015fahs\u0131n tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131na 160 cm mesafeden, 60 cm bel y\u00fcksekli\u011finden 15 derecelik a\u00e7\u0131yla at\u0131\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fi tespit edildi. (\u2026) Malatya Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan bilirki\u015fi olarak atanan Uzman Dr. ….\u2019\u0131n 02.04.2014 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporunun de\u011ferlendirme k\u0131sm\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi 3. madde g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, olayda kullan\u0131lan t\u00fcfe\u011fin belden at\u0131\u015f yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in tetik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bel hizas\u0131nda dip\u00e7ik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ise bel arkas\u0131nda kalmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, B noktas\u0131ndan belden at\u0131\u015f i\u00e7in yap\u0131land\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 109 cm uzunlu\u011fundaki av t\u00fcfe\u011finin 20-25 cm\u2019lik dip\u00e7ik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n bel arkas\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, 85-90 cm\u2019lik t\u00fcfe\u011fin kalan k\u0131sm\u0131 ile A noktas\u0131 ile tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131nda kalan 70 cm’lik mesafe dahil edildi\u011finde B noktas\u0131 ve tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki 160 cm\u2019lik mesafeye denk geldi\u011fi ve giri\u015f deli\u011fi bulunan tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerindeki Pvc k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fczerinde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 kalmas\u0131 i\u00e7in namlu a\u011fz\u0131, tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki mesafenin en fazla 1 metre olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 da konum olarak B noktas\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan at\u0131\u015f\u0131n do\u011frulad\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan tespit edilmi\u015ftir.” ibaresine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
13.09.2011 ve 15.09.2011 tarihli cevap yaz\u0131lar\u0131nda; tan\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n 17 kg a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, 98 cm boyunda, kol uzunlu\u011funun 37 cm, bacak uzunlu\u011funun 40 cm oldu\u011fu, her iki kol aras\u0131ndaki mesafenin 90 cm oldu\u011fu, 109 cm uzunlu\u011fundaki av t\u00fcfe\u011finin olay s\u0131ras\u0131ndaki dolu fi\u015fekle birlikte a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 3.415 gram oldu\u011fu tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 2. \u0130htisas Kurulunca d\u00fczenlenen 11.08.2017 ve 09.01.2018 tarihli raporlarda; dosyada mevcut CD\u2019de kay\u0131tl\u0131 soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …\u2019\u0131n Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 huzurunda beyan\u0131n\u0131n kaydedildi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin Kurulca yap\u0131lan incelenmesinde, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn herhangi bir ortopedik veya n\u00f6rolojik bozuklu\u011fa sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bedensel olarak ya\u015f\u0131na g\u00f6re geli\u015fiminin normal oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re; dosyada mevcut adli ve t\u0131bbi belgeler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, soruldu\u011fu \u00fczere 12.09.2011, olay tarihinde eylemde kullan\u0131lan av t\u00fcfe\u011fini tek ba\u015f\u0131na ta\u015f\u0131yabilece\u011fi, namluda fi\u015fek at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r ve kurulu vaziyette ise, silah\u0131n teti\u011fine ate\u015f etmeye yeter d\u00fczeyde gerekli bas\u0131nc\u0131 uygulayabilece\u011fi, at\u0131\u015f s\u0131ras\u0131nda t\u00fcfe\u011fin dip\u00e7ik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n v\u00fccuda dayal\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumda ate\u015f edildi\u011finde herhangi bir yaralanma, ekimoz g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyece\u011fi bilgilerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Adli T\u0131p Kurumu Fizik \u0130htisas Dairesi Balistik \u015eubesince d\u00fczenlenen 01.03.2017 tarihli raporda; incelenmek i\u00e7in g\u00f6nderilen \u00fczerinde 57302 numaras\u0131 bulunan av t\u00fcfe\u011finin, yivsiz-setsiz bir namluya sahip oldu\u011fu, emniyet sisteminin kullan\u0131lmaya elveri\u015fli oldu\u011fu, alev gizleyeni ile birlikte namlu boyunun 53,7 cm, namlu ucu ile tetik aras\u0131n\u0131n 70,7 cm uzunlu\u011funda oldu\u011fu, t\u00fcfe\u011fin t\u00fcm uzunlu\u011funun ise 106,8 cm olarak \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, t\u00fcfe\u011fin kullan\u0131lmaya elveri\u015fli olup ate\u015f etmesine mani mekanik ar\u0131zas\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r h\u00e2lde yani fi\u015fek yata\u011f\u0131nda fi\u015fek var ve emniyeti a\u00e7\u0131k iken teti\u011fine bas\u0131n\u00e7 kuvveti uygulanmadan \u00e7ekme, \u00e7eki\u015ftirme veya sars\u0131nt\u0131 gibi etkenlerle kendili\u011finden patlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi beton gibi sert bir zemin \u00fczerine d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ya da dip\u00e7i\u011fi yere gelecek \u015fekilde d\u00fc\u015fmesi veya vurulmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda da kendili\u011finden patlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, fi\u015fek yata\u011f\u0131ndaki fi\u015fe\u011fin patlamas\u0131 i\u00e7in elektronik tetik \u00f6l\u00e7me cihaz\u0131 ile yap\u0131lan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm s\u0131ras\u0131nda teti\u011fine 3,5 kg civar\u0131nda bas\u0131n\u00e7 kuvveti uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi tespitlerine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Kat\u0131lan … mahkemede; \u00f6lenin karde\u015fi oldu\u011funu, g\u00f6rg\u00fcye dayal\u0131 bilgisinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6nce olay\u0131n kaza oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fcklerini ancak daha sonra ye\u011fenlerinin aralar\u0131ndaki konu\u015fma ve \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlar\u0131na bakarak olay\u0131n kaza olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, cinayet olabilece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,
\nTan\u0131k … mahkemede; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n karde\u015fi oldu\u011funu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc, saat 09.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde park meselesi y\u00fcz\u00fcnden birka\u00e7 ki\u015fiyle kavga ettiklerini, gidip av t\u00fcfe\u011fi fi\u015fe\u011fi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, fi\u015fekleri t\u00fcfe\u011fe doldurdu\u011funu ve mutfak olarak kullan\u0131lan k\u0131sm\u0131n yan\u0131nda, av t\u00fcfe\u011fini at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r bir vaziyette duvara yaslad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, d\u00fc\u015fmanlar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in i\u015f yerinde av t\u00fcfe\u011fi bulundurduklar\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k … mahkemede; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131nda i\u015f yerinin bulundu\u011funu, saat 12.00 s\u0131ralar\u0131nda bir g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc i\u015fitti\u011fini, \u00e7ocuk ba\u011f\u0131rt\u0131lar\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131k …\u2019in d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131na gitti\u011fini, ne oldu\u011funu sordu\u011funda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck o\u011flu …\u2019in, karde\u015finin elinde av t\u00fcfe\u011finin patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve annesinin vuruldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, i\u00e7eri girdi\u011finde t\u00fcfe\u011fin dik \u015fekilde duvara dayal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, \u00f6lenin tuvaletin i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funu, \u00f6leni tuvaletten kendilerinin \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u00e7eri girdi\u011finde \u00f6lenin \u00fcst\u00fcn\u00fcn bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu ama genelde giyinik \u015fekilde oldu\u011funu, san\u0131k …\u2019in “Han\u0131m\u0131m yaraland\u0131, yard\u0131m edin, ambulans \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131n.” dedi\u011fini, d\u00fckk\u00e2ndan \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p cankurtaran \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n e\u015fi \u00f6lenin \u00f6nceden de d\u00fckk\u00e2na gelip gitti\u011fini, herhangi bir g\u00fcr\u00fclt\u00fc ve tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131 duymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sabah olan tart\u0131\u015fmay\u0131 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini ancak ara\u00e7 park edilmesi y\u00fcz\u00fcnden bir tart\u0131\u015fma ve gerginlik oldu\u011funu kom\u015fulardan duydu\u011funu,<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k Kader Polat mahkemede; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve \u00f6lenin m\u00fc\u015fterek k\u0131zlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu, anne ve babas\u0131 aras\u0131nda zaman zaman s\u00f6zl\u00fc tart\u0131\u015fmalar oldu\u011funu ancak birbirlerini hi\u00e7 k\u0131rmad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, olaydan sonra day\u0131s\u0131 kat\u0131lan … kendisini arad\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, savc\u0131n\u0131n …\u2019i para ile kand\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ona sorular sorarak “H\u0131, h\u0131.” diye cevaplar al\u0131p yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ona s\u00f6yledi\u011fini,<\/p>\n
\u0130fade etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 13.09.2011 tarihinde kendisi ile ileti\u015fim kurulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorulan sorulara cevap vermedi\u011fi belirtilerek tutanak d\u00fczenlenen tan\u0131k … 23.11.2011 tarihindeki ifadesine ili\u015fkin tutulan tutanakta; “Tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tek ba\u015f\u0131na Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 odas\u0131na giremedi\u011finden amcas\u0131 … e\u015fli\u011finde ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verildi. …’\u0131n ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta ileti\u015fim kurmak istemedi\u011fi, \u0131srarl\u0131 bir \u015fekilde birlikte gelen babas\u0131 ile gitmek istedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde hareketlerde bulundu\u011fu, bunun \u00fczerine \u00e7ocu\u011fun \u0131s\u0131nmas\u0131, al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7ikolata ve oyuncak araba temin edilerek bir s\u00fcre ileti\u015fim kurularak normal \u00e7ocu\u011fun ilgisini \u00e7ekecek konulardan konu\u015fularak ortama ve \u015fah\u0131slara al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 sa\u011fland\u0131. \u00c7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve annesinin vefat etmesi, babas\u0131n\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheli olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kendisinden tan\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa r\u0131za g\u00f6sterip g\u00f6stermedi\u011fi sorulmad\u0131. Ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedeniyle yemini yapt\u0131r\u0131lmad\u0131. …’a su\u00e7ta kullan\u0131lan ve emanette kay\u0131tl\u0131 bulunan, \u00fczeri bez torba ile kapl\u0131, \u015feffaf koli band\u0131 ile \u00e7epe\u00e7evre sar\u0131l\u0131 vaziyetteki av t\u00fcfe\u011fi g\u00f6sterilip ta\u015f\u0131nmas\u0131 istendi\u011finde iki eli ile t\u00fcfe\u011fi tutup kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131, yan \u00e7evrildi\u011finde ayn\u0131 yerden iki eli ile kavrayarak tutu\u011fu Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131na do\u011fru getirmesi s\u00f6ylendi\u011finde zorlanarak da olsa getirerek verdi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. Beyan\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi. \u0130fadenin al\u0131nmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda olay\u0131n olu\u015funu kendili\u011finden anlatmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 soru cevap \u015feklinde sorular sormak suretiyle cevap al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bu \u015fekilde beyan\u0131n al\u0131nmas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi. T\u00fcfe\u011fin ne oldu\u011fu soruldu, \u2018C\u0131k\u2019 \u015feklinde cevap verdi\u011fi, amcas\u0131n\u0131 i\u015faret ederek \u2018Onun var.\u2019 dedi\u011fi \u2018Nerede?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018Karakolda.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018T\u00fcfe\u011fi hi\u00e7 eline ald\u0131n m\u0131?\u2019 \u015feklindeki soruya; kafas\u0131 ile \u2018Evet\u2019 anlam\u0131 ifade edecek \u015fekilde a\u015fa\u011f\u0131 yukar\u0131 sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u2018Sonras\u0131nda ne yapt\u0131n?\u2019 dendi\u011finde \u2018S\u0131kt\u0131m\u2019 diye s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, \u2018Patlad\u0131 m\u0131?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda kafas\u0131n\u0131 \u2018Evet\u2019 anlam\u0131nda sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u2018Nereye?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018Deli\u011fe\u2019 diye cevap verdi\u011fi, \u2018… a\u011flad\u0131.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Silah nereye de\u011fdi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, omzunun sol \u00fcst taraf\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stererek i\u015faret etti\u011fi, \u2018Kimin oras\u0131na de\u011fdi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018Annemin\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Ate\u015f alma nedeniyle can\u0131n\u0131n yan\u0131p yanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019 soruldu\u011funda, \u2018Yanmad\u0131\u2019 \u015feklinde cevap verdi\u011fi, \u2018Annen neredeydi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018Annem hastanedeydi\u2019, yeniden soruldu\u011funda ise \u2018Mezardayd\u0131.\u2019 \u015feklinde cevap verdi\u011fi, tekrar izah edilerek soruldu\u011funda \u2018\u00dcst kattayd\u0131.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, sonras\u0131nda \u2018Tuvalette miydi?’ diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018Tulavelette idi, tuvalette oldu\u011funu g\u00f6rmedim.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Kap\u0131ya de\u011fdi mi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018Kap\u0131ya de\u011fdi.\u2019 diyerek cevap verdi\u011fi, \u2018Baban ne yap\u0131yordu o s\u0131rada, yan\u0131nda m\u0131yd\u0131?\u2019 dendi\u011finde; \u2018Yan\u0131mdayd\u0131.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Kuca\u011f\u0131nda m\u0131yd\u0131n yoksa?\u2019 dendi\u011finde, \u2018He\u2019 diyerek cevap verdi\u011fi, bir daha soruldu\u011funda tekrar ayn\u0131 cevab\u0131 verdi\u011fi, \u2018S\u0131kt\u0131ktan sonra m\u0131 ald\u0131?\u2019 dendi\u011finde yine kafas\u0131n\u0131 \u2018Evet’ \u015feklinde sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yine sorulan soru \u00fczerine \u2018Babam i\u00e7erideydi, d\u00fckk\u00e2nda idi, ben de i\u00e7erideydim.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Silah\u0131 nereden ald\u0131n?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018Babam verdi.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Baban ne dedi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018Bir daha s\u0131kma, t\u00fcfe\u011fe kar\u0131\u015fma, t\u00fcfe\u011fi amcam b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Nereye b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131, t\u00fcfek duvara dayal\u0131 m\u0131yd\u0131?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018He, babam izin verdi, ben de s\u0131kt\u0131m.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Oyun oyna diye mi verdi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018He\u2019 diye cevap verdi\u011fi, \u2018Sen de ald\u0131n oynad\u0131n m\u0131?\u2019 dendi\u011finde \u2018He\u2019 dedi\u011fi, yeniden t\u00fcfe\u011fin ne oldu\u011fu soruldu\u011funda; bildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi, t\u00fcfe\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 istendi\u011finde isteksiz davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u2018Tek ba\u015f\u0131na m\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131n?\u2019 dendi\u011finde, \u2018He\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Baban yard\u0131m etti mi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018\u015e\u00f6yle tuttu, ben de s\u0131kt\u0131m.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, elleri ile bu s\u0131rada \u00f6ne do\u011fru i\u015faret yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc, \u2018Av t\u00fcfe\u011fini baban m\u0131 tutu?\u2019 dendi\u011finde \u2018He\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Silah\u0131 babam da tuttu, ben de tuttum.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Ne diye?\u2019 soruldu\u011funda \u2018S\u0131kal\u0131m diye\u2019 cevap verdi\u011fi, \u2018… yan\u0131n\u0131zda m\u0131yd\u0131?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018He, i\u00e7erideydi, oyun oynuyordu.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, amcas\u0131na d\u00f6nerek \u2018Sen neredeydin?\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Teti\u011fe bast\u0131\u011f\u0131nda neredeydin, yerde miydin?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018C\u0131k\u2019 dedi\u011fi, eli ile i\u015faret yaparak s\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti\u011fi, hangi eliyle soruldu\u011funda sa\u011f eliyle teti\u011fe basma hareketi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, su\u00e7ta kullan\u0131lan av t\u00fcfe\u011fi verilerek teti\u011fe bas\u0131p basmayaca\u011f\u0131 kontrol edilmek istendi\u011finde, isteksiz davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131, etkilenebilece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclerek \u0131srarda bulunulmad\u0131, av t\u00fcfe\u011finin \u00e7\u0131plak olarak g\u00f6sterilmesinin olumsuz etkilerinin olabilece\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc, vazge\u00e7ildi. \u2018Yere mi bas\u0131yordun?\u2019 dendi\u011finde, \u2018He.\u2019 dedi\u011fi \u2018Yoksa baban\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131nda m\u0131yd\u0131n?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018Babam\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131ndayd\u0131m.\u2019 diye cevap verdi\u011fi, \u2018Baban m\u0131, s\u0131k dedi?\u2019 dendi\u011finde, \u2018He\u2019 der gibi s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, \u2018S\u0131kmak istedin mi?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda, \u2018\u0130stedim.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda suskun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u2018T\u00fcfe\u011fi nas\u0131l ald\u0131n?\u2019 diye soruldu\u011funda \u2018Ald\u0131m.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Tuvaletin oraya nas\u0131l gittin?\u2019 dendi\u011finde, \u2018\u015e\u00f6yle gittim.\u2019 \u015feklinde \u00f6ne do\u011fru eli ile i\u015faret yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u2018Kendim mi ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131n?\u2019 dendi\u011finde \u2018He.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Baban m\u0131 silah\u0131 verdi?\u2019 dendi\u011finde \u2018He, babam yan\u0131mdayd\u0131, babam kuca\u011f\u0131na alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u2019 dedi\u011fi, \u2018Baban\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131ndayken mi silah\u0131 s\u0131kt\u0131n?\u2019 diye son olarak soruldu\u011funda \u2018He\u2019. dedi\u011fi, anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Pedagog bilirki\u015fiden soruldu; \u00e7ocu\u011fun zihinsel geli\u015fimi biyolojik ya\u015f\u0131na uygundur. Ya\u015f\u0131 itibar\u0131 ile soyut d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ve yer y\u00f6n ve zaman kavramlar\u0131 geli\u015fmedi\u011finden ifade verme s\u0131ras\u0131nda zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlarda bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6zlemledim.” ibaresine yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Mahkemede; mahkeme ba\u015fkan\u0131n\u0131n “Annenle mi gittin oraya?” diye sormas\u0131 \u00fczerine “He.” dedi\u011fi; “Orada t\u00fcfek g\u00f6rd\u00fcn m\u00fc?” diye sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine “Evet” anlam\u0131nda ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131, “O t\u00fcfe\u011fi sen ald\u0131n m\u0131?” diye sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine “Evet” anlam\u0131nda ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 sallad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve “Annem su verecekti bana, tuvalete girmi\u015fti, t\u00fcfekle vurdum, babam da yan\u0131mda idi, … bilgisayar\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda idi.” dedi\u011fi, “Sen baban\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131nda m\u0131yd\u0131n, yerde miydin?” diye sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine “Ben babam\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131nda idim.” diye cevap verdi\u011fi, “T\u00fcfe\u011fin patlamadan \u00f6nce sen baban\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131nda m\u0131yd\u0131n, yerde miydin?” diye sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine “Ben babam\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131nda idim” diye cevap verdi\u011fi, “Baban\u0131n kuca\u011f\u0131nda iken baban da t\u00fcfe\u011fi tutuyor muydu?” diye sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine, “Ben tutmu\u015ftum, babam da t\u00fcfe\u011fi tutmu\u015ftu, ben ha b\u00f6yle s\u0131kt\u0131m.” diye cevap verdi\u011fi, emanetten getirtilen su\u00e7a konu t\u00fcfek kendisine verilip kald\u0131rmas\u0131 istendi\u011finde, “Ben yapmam, kald\u0131ramam.” dedi\u011fi, “T\u00fcfek patlad\u0131ktan sonra m\u0131 baban seni kuca\u011f\u0131na ald\u0131?” diye soruldu\u011funda “\u00d6yle ald\u0131, ben de ald\u0131m, vurdum.” diye cevap verdi\u011fi, “O g\u00fcn silah\u0131 nereden ald\u0131n?” diye soruldu\u011funda, “Babam verdi elime.” diye cevap verdi\u011fi,<\/p>\n
Anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Atanan yasal temsilcisinin muvafakati al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra mahkemede; su\u00e7 tarihinde tuvaletin \u00f6n\u00fcnde elinde babas\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcfe\u011fi oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde oynad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcfekle oynad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada t\u00fcfe\u011fin birden ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n da sinirlenerek gelip elinden t\u00fcfe\u011fi ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki ifadesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda ya\u015f\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck oldu\u011funu, o ifadesinde t\u00fcfe\u011fi babas\u0131n\u0131n eline verdi\u011fi, t\u00fcfe\u011fi do\u011frultmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini, hatta t\u00fcfe\u011fi tutarak do\u011frulttu\u011funu ve teti\u011fe basmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini beyan etmi\u015f ise de \u015fimdiki ifadesinin daha do\u011fru oldu\u011funu,<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131k … mahkemede; san\u0131k ve \u00f6lenin o\u011flu oldu\u011funu, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc annesi \u00f6len ile birlikte sosyal yard\u0131mla\u015fmadan para almaya gideceklerini, karde\u015fi … de yanlar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde evden \u00e7\u0131karak babas\u0131n\u0131n d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131na geldiklerini, annesinin tuvalete girdi\u011fini, babas\u0131 ile kendisinin ise \u00f6n k\u0131s\u0131mda bulunduklar\u0131n\u0131, karde\u015fi …\u2019in elinde silah\u0131 g\u00f6ren babas\u0131n\u0131n ko\u015ftu\u011funu, namluya tam vurdu\u011fu s\u0131rada silah\u0131n ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay\u0131n d\u00fckk\u00e2na girdikten yakla\u015f\u0131k 15 dakika sonra meydana geldi\u011fini, bilgisayar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131p internette gezindi\u011fi s\u0131rada babas\u0131n\u0131n ko\u015ftu\u011funu g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, bakt\u0131\u011f\u0131nda karde\u015fi …\u2019in elindeki silah\u0131 g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, babas\u0131n\u0131n tam eliyle silaha vuraca\u011f\u0131 esnada silah\u0131n ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, d\u00fckk\u00e2na girdiklerinde babas\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n silah\u0131n yerini g\u00f6sterip silahla oynamamalar\u0131n\u0131 tembihledi\u011fini, karde\u015fi …\u2019in t\u00fcfe\u011fi kald\u0131rabilecek g\u00fc\u00e7te oldu\u011funu, karde\u015finin sa\u011f elinin tetikte oldu\u011funu, tam vuraca\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada babas\u0131n\u0131n yeti\u015fti\u011fini, o s\u0131rada t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
Atanan yasal temsilcisinin muvafakati al\u0131nd\u0131ktan sonra mahkemede; su\u00e7 tarihinde hen\u00fcz 12-13 ya\u015flar\u0131nda oldu\u011funu, babas\u0131 san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n oto kiralama i\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n iki b\u00f6l\u00fcmden olu\u015ftu\u011funu, d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n \u00f6n b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde m\u00fc\u015fterilerin a\u011f\u0131rland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, arka k\u0131s\u0131mda ise mutfak ve lavabonun bulundu\u011funu, su\u00e7 tarihinden \u00f6nce i\u015f yerinde t\u00fcfek g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, babas\u0131n\u0131n av merak\u0131n\u0131n olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcfe\u011fi kendisini korumak amac\u0131yla ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihinde birka\u00e7 ki\u015fiyle tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in babas\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcrekli d\u0131\u015far\u0131y\u0131 kollad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, t\u00fcfe\u011fin mutfak tezg\u00e2h\u0131na yaslanm\u0131\u015f vaziyette oldu\u011funu, i\u015f yerine bo\u015f zamanlarda gelip gitmesine kar\u015f\u0131n daha \u00f6nce t\u00fcfe\u011fi hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, babas\u0131yla birlikte i\u015f yerinin \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131nda oturduklar\u0131n\u0131, arka k\u0131s\u0131mda ise annesi ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck karde\u015fi …\u2019in bulundu\u011funu, kap\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in babas\u0131n\u0131n oturdu\u011fu yerden, i\u00e7erideki k\u0131sm\u0131n ve tuvaletin bulundu\u011fu yerin g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, babas\u0131n\u0131n bir anda oturdu\u011fu yerden i\u00e7erideki k\u0131sma ko\u015fturdu\u011funu, merak\u0131ndan kendisinin de babas\u0131n\u0131n pe\u015finden i\u00e7eri ko\u015ftu\u011funu, i\u00e7eri girdi\u011finde karde\u015fi …’in elinde t\u00fcfek g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, …\u2019in t\u00fcfe\u011fi tutmu\u015f ve tuvalete do\u011frultmu\u015f oldu\u011funu, babas\u0131 t\u00fcfe\u011fi al\u0131r almaz t\u00fcfe\u011fin patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u00e7eride bulunan annesinin yaralan\u0131p vefat etti\u011fini, su\u00e7 tarihinden \u00f6nce anne ve babas\u0131n\u0131n ara s\u0131ra tart\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ancak sebebini hat\u0131rlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, karde\u015fi …\u2019in yerde oturur vaziyette oldu\u011funu, t\u00fcfe\u011fin de kuca\u011f\u0131nda oldu\u011funu, t\u00fcfe\u011fin namlusunun yere paralel hatta biraz daha e\u011fik durumda oldu\u011funu, babas\u0131, patlarsa yukar\u0131 do\u011fru patlas\u0131n diye t\u00fcfe\u011fin namlusunu yukar\u0131 kald\u0131rmak i\u00e7in m\u00fcdahale etti\u011fi s\u0131rada t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, babas\u0131n\u0131n olaydan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce kendisini ve karde\u015fi …\u2019i t\u00fcfekle oynamamalar\u0131 i\u00e7in uyard\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
Tan\u0131klar …. ve …. kollukta; \u00f6lenin kom\u015fusu ve yak\u0131n arkada\u015f\u0131 olduklar\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6lenin e\u015fiyle aras\u0131nda ciddi bir sorun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00f6lenin \u00e7ok yoksulluk \u00e7ekmesine kar\u015f\u0131n e\u015finden hep sevgiyle bahsetti\u011fini, samimi sohbetlerinde de e\u015fi olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine iyi davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fini \u0130fade etmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
San\u0131k … kollukta; olay g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u015f yerinde bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada \u00f6\u011fle vakti e\u015fi ve o\u011fullar\u0131n\u0131n geldiklerini, bir s\u00fcre oturup konu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131, bir ara mutfak taraf\u0131na d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck o\u011flu …\u2019i t\u00fcfe\u011fi bulundu\u011fu yerden alm\u0131\u015f, tuvaletin kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, …\u2019in bir eli ile t\u00fcfe\u011fin dip\u00e7ik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 tutmu\u015f, di\u011fer eli ile de tetik taraf\u0131n\u0131 tutmu\u015f oldu\u011funu, t\u00fcfe\u011fin namlusunun tuvaletin kap\u0131s\u0131na d\u00f6n\u00fck oldu\u011funu, e\u015finin bu s\u0131rada tuvalette oldu\u011funu, o\u011flunu bu \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fcnce hemen yan\u0131na ko\u015ftu\u011funu ve sa\u011f eliyle orta k\u0131sm\u0131ndan yakalay\u0131p yukar\u0131ya do\u011fru \u00e7ekerek t\u00fcfe\u011fi \u00e7ocu\u011fun elinden almaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131,<\/p>\n
Mahkemede; olay tarihinde e\u015fi olan \u00f6len … ile \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 … ve …\u2019in i\u015f yerine geldiklerini, yakla\u015f\u0131k 10 dakika kadar oturduklar\u0131n\u0131, e\u015fi \u00f6len …\u2019n\u0131n tuvalete gitti\u011fini, bu s\u0131rada kendisinin ise iki b\u00f6l\u00fcmden ibaret d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n k\u0131sm\u0131nda gezindi\u011fini, gezinirken arka tarafta bulunan o\u011flu …\u2019in elinde av t\u00fcfe\u011fi oldu\u011funu fark etti\u011fini, t\u00fcfe\u011fin dip\u00e7ik k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n yerde, namlusunun ise tuvalete d\u00f6n\u00fck oldu\u011funu, …\u2019in t\u00fcfe\u011fi, a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k dip\u00e7i\u011fin \u00fczerinde olacak \u015fekilde tutup kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve yatay bir \u015fekilde tuvalete do\u011fru tuttu\u011funu, h\u0131zla gidip t\u00fcfe\u011fe elini att\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, e\u015fine seslendi\u011fini ancak cevap alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine tuvaletin kap\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, e\u015finin yere y\u0131\u011f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, cankurtaran \u00e7a\u011f\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kom\u015fusu ile birlikte e\u015fini tuvaletin d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, e\u015fini kesinlikle \u00f6ld\u00fcrmedi\u011fini, panik atak hastas\u0131 olan e\u015finin defalarca intihara kalk\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak kendisinin engel oldu\u011funu, mahkemede g\u00f6r\u00fclen davalardan da bilinece\u011fi \u00fczere d\u00fc\u015fman sahibi oldu\u011funu, daha \u00f6nce 17 b\u0131\u00e7ak, 3 kur\u015fun yedi\u011fini, bu nedenle elinin ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde silah\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bu nedenle d\u00fckk\u00e2nda silah bulundu\u011funu, su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funu, beraatini talep etti\u011fini,
\nSavunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
A. \u0130lgili Mevzuat ve Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Konular\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin A\u00e7\u0131klamalar<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusunda isabetli bir hukuki \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme ula\u015f\u0131labilmesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, do\u011frudan kast, olas\u0131 kast, taksir ve bilin\u00e7li taksire de\u011finilerek, birbirlerinden ay\u0131rdedici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerin ortaya konulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
TCK’n\u0131n “Kast” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesi; “(1) Su\u00e7un olu\u015fmas\u0131 kast\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Kast, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir.<\/p>\n
(2) Ki\u015finin, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen, fiili i\u015flemesi halinde olas\u0131 kast vard\u0131r. Bu halde, a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7larda m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na, m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren su\u00e7larda yirmi y\u0131ldan yirmibe\u015f y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmolunur; di\u011fer su\u00e7larda ise temel ceza \u00fc\u00e7te birden yar\u0131s\u0131na kadar indirilir” \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenerek, maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ikinci c\u00fcmlesinde do\u011frudan kast, ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n birinci c\u00fcmlesinde de olas\u0131 kast tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Olas\u0131 kast\u0131n tan\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde; “…Olas\u0131 kast durumunda su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda yer alan unsurlardan birinin somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen, ki\u015fi fiili i\u015flemektedir. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, fail unsurlar\u0131n meydana gelmesini kabullenmektedir. Mevzuat\u0131m\u0131za giren yeni bir kavram olan olas\u0131 kastla ilgili uygulamadan baz\u0131 \u00f6rnekler vermek yararl\u0131 olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Yolda seyreden bir otob\u00fcs s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc, trafik lambas\u0131n\u0131n kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 yanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, kav\u015fakta durmadan ge\u00e7mek ister; ancak kendilerine ye\u015fil \u0131\u015f\u0131k yanan kav\u015faktan ge\u00e7mekte olan yayalara \u00e7arpar ve bunlardan bir veya birka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne veya yaralanmas\u0131na neden olur. Trafik lambas\u0131 kendisine k\u0131rm\u0131z\u0131 yanan s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fc, yaya ge\u00e7idinden her an birilerinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fini g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f; fakat, buna ra\u011fmen kav\u015fakta durmam\u0131\u015f ve yoluna devam etmi\u015ftir. Bu durumda otob\u00fcs s\u00fcr\u00fcc\u00fcs\u00fc, meydana gelen \u00f6l\u00fcm veya yaralama neticelerinin ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rerek, bunlar\u0131 kabullenmi\u015ftir.
\nD\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn evinde t\u00f6rene kat\u0131lanlar\u0131n tabancalar\u0131 ile odan\u0131n tavan\u0131na do\u011fru ard\u0131 ard\u0131na ate\u015f ettikleri s\u0131rada, bir ki\u015finin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 alkol\u00fcn de etkisi ile elinin seyrini kaybetmesi sonucu, yere paralel olarak yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015flardan bir tanesinden \u00e7\u0131kan kur\u015fun, t\u00f6rene kat\u0131lanlardan birinin aln\u0131na isabet ederek \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olur. Bu \u00f6rnek olayda ki\u015fi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 at\u0131\u015flardan \u00e7\u0131kan kur\u015funlar\u0131n orada bulunan herhangi birine isabet edebilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f; fakat, buna ra\u011fmen sil\u00e2h\u0131yla at\u0131\u015fa devam etmi\u015ftir. Burada da fail sil\u00e2h\u0131yla ate\u015f ederken ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak yaralama veya \u00f6l\u00fcm neticelerini kabullenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Verilen bu \u00f6rneklerde ki\u015finin olas\u0131 kastla hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekir.” \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamalara yer verilmi\u015f ve olas\u0131 kasta ili\u015fkin \u00f6rnek olaylar g\u00f6sterilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Buna g\u00f6re, do\u011frudan kast; \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ve su\u00e7 te\u015fkil eden fiili ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeye y\u00f6nelik irade olup kanunda su\u00e7 olarak tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f eylemin bilerek ve istenerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi ile olu\u015fur. Fail hareketinin kanuni tipi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini bilmesi ve istemesi h\u00e2linde do\u011frudan kastla hareket etmi\u015f olacak, buna kar\u015f\u0131n i\u015flemi\u015f oldu\u011fu fiilin muhtemel baz\u0131 neticeleri meydana getirebilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ve bu neticelerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve muhtemel olarak tasavvur etmesine ra\u011fmen muhtemel neticeyi kabullenerek fiili i\u015flemesi h\u00e2linde olas\u0131 kast s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r.
\nOlas\u0131 kast ile do\u011frudan kast aras\u0131ndaki fark\u0131 ortaya koyan en belirgin unsur, do\u011frudan kasttaki bilme unsurudur. Fail hareketinin kanuni tipi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fini biliyorsa do\u011frudan kas\u0131tla hareket etti\u011finin kabul\u00fc gerekmektedir. Yine failin hareketiyle hedefledi\u011fi do\u011frudan neticelerle birlikte, hareketin zorunlu veya ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131lmaz olarak ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan sonu\u00e7lar\u0131 da, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a istenmese dahi do\u011frudan kast\u0131n kapsam\u0131 i\u00e7inde de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. Belli bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine y\u00f6nelik hareketin, g\u00fcnl\u00fck hayat tecr\u00fcbelerine g\u00f6re di\u011fer bir k\u0131s\u0131m neticeleri de do\u011furmas\u0131 muhakkak ise failin bu sonu\u00e7lar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da do\u011frudan kastla hareket etti\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Olas\u0131 kast\u0131 do\u011frudan kasttan ay\u0131ran di\u011fer \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct; su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinin muhakkak olmay\u0131p muhtemel olmas\u0131d\u0131r. Fail, b\u00f6yle bir durumda muhakkak de\u011fil ama b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ihtimalle ger\u00e7ekle\u015fecek olan neticenin meydana gelmesini kabullenmekte ve olursa olsun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile g\u00f6ze almakta; neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi i\u00e7in herhangi bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6stermemektedir. Olas\u0131 kastta fiilin kanunda tan\u0131mlanan bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine neden olaca\u011f\u0131 muhtemel g\u00f6r\u00fclmesine kar\u015f\u0131n, bu neticenin meydana gelmesi fail taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmektedir.
\nTCK’n\u0131n haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131nda esas al\u0131nan su\u00e7 teorisinde kanunda tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f haks\u0131zl\u0131k olarak ifade edilen su\u00e7; kural olarak ancak kastla, kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilen h\u00e2llerde ise taksirle de i\u015flenebilir. \u0130stisnai bir kusurluluk \u015fekli olan taksirde, failin cezaland\u0131r\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in mutlaka kanunda a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. TCK’n\u0131n 22\/2. maddesinde taksir; “Dikkat ve \u00f6zen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k dolay\u0131s\u0131yla, bir davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda belirtilen neticesi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeyerek ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesidir” \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Taksirli su\u00e7larda, gerek icrai, gerekse ihm\u00e2li hareketin iradi olmas\u0131 ve meydana gelen neticenin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir olmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. \u0130radi bir davran\u0131\u015f bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 takdirde taksirden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi gibi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemeyecek bir sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi h\u00e2linde de failin taksirli su\u00e7tan sorumlulu\u011funa gidilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
Sonucun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesinde ma\u011fdurun taksirli davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n da etkisinin olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, di\u011fer taksirli davran\u0131\u015f nedensellik ba\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kesmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece bu durum, failin sorumlulu\u011funu ortadan kald\u0131rmayaca\u011f\u0131 gibi taksirin niteli\u011fini de de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyecektir. T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nda kusurun derecelendirilmesi suretiyle herhangi bir ceza indirimi s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, bu h\u00e2l ancak temel cezan\u0131n tayininde dikkate al\u0131nabilecektir.<\/p>\n
TCK’da taksir; basit ve bilin\u00e7li taksir olarak ikili bir ayr\u0131ma tabi tutulmu\u015f, 22. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda bilin\u00e7li taksir; “Ki\u015finin \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi” \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f, bu h\u00e2lde taksirli su\u00e7a ili\u015fkin cezan\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te birden yar\u0131ya kadar artt\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
Basit taksir ile bilin\u00e7li taksir aras\u0131ndaki ay\u0131rt edici \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct; taksirde failin \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir nitelikteki neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmemesi, bilin\u00e7li taksir h\u00e2linde ise bu neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Bilin\u00e7li taksirde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen sonu\u00e7, fail taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2lde istenmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Ger\u00e7ekten neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00e2lde, s\u0131rf \u015fans\u0131na veya ba\u015fka etkenlere, hatta kendi beceri veya bilgisine g\u00fcvenerek hareket eden kimsenin tehlikelilik h\u00e2li, bunu \u00f6ng\u00f6rememi\u015f olan kimsenin tehlikelilik h\u00e2li ile bir tutulamayacakt\u0131r. Neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kimse, ne olursa olsun bu sonucu meydana getirecek harekette bulunmamakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
TCK’n\u0131n 21. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda; “Ki\u015finin, su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131ndaki unsurlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilece\u011fini \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen, fiili i\u015flemesi” \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlan\u0131p ba\u015fkaca ay\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 unsura yer verilmeyen olas\u0131 kast ile ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 22. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda; “Ki\u015finin, \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc neticeyi istememesine kar\u015f\u0131n, neticenin meydana gelmesi halinde bilin\u00e7li taksir vard\u0131r.” bi\u00e7iminde tan\u0131mlanan bilin\u00e7li taksirin kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 hususu \u00f6\u011fretide dile getirilmi\u015f, kanun koyucu da madde metninde yer vermedi\u011fi kabullenme \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc ayn\u0131 maddenin gerek\u00e7esinde; “Olas\u0131 kast halinde su\u00e7un kanuni tan\u0131m\u0131nda yer alan unsurlardan birinin somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fi \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesine ra\u011fmen, ki\u015fi fiili i\u015flemektedir, di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, fail unsurlar\u0131n meydana gelmesini kabullenmektedir.” \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamak suretiyle, olas\u0131 kast\u0131 bilin\u00e7li taksirden ay\u0131racak k\u0131stas\u0131 ortaya koymu\u015ftur.
\nOlas\u0131 kastla bilin\u00e7li taksiri ay\u0131rdetme konusunda doktrinde; “Her ikisi aras\u0131ndaki ayr\u0131m\u0131 belirlemek bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Frank form\u00fcl\u00fc uygulanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re e\u011fer \u2018\u00f6yle veya b\u00f6yle fail her h\u00e2lde hareketi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirirdi\u2019 diyebiliyorsak olas\u0131 kast; \u2018neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011fini bilseydi hareketi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmeyecekti\u2019 diyebiliyorsak bilin\u00e7li taksirden s\u00f6z edilir…Her ikisi aras\u0131nda bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in her somut olay bak\u0131m\u0131ndan failin ayr\u0131ca neticeyi g\u00f6ze alm\u0131\u015f, kabullenmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131p say\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlu g\u00f6r\u00fcnmektedir.” \u015feklinde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler mevcuttur (Bahri \u00d6zt\u00fcrk-Mustafa Ruhan Erdem, Uygulamal\u0131 Ceza Hukuku ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirleri Hukuku, Se\u00e7kin Akademik ve Mesleki Yay\u0131nlar, 17. Bask\u0131, Ankara 2017, s. 303-304).<\/p>\n
\u00d6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen muhtemel neticenin meydana gelmesine kay\u0131ts\u0131z kal\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda olas\u0131 kast, \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen muhtemel neticenin meydana gelmesinin istenmemesine ra\u011fmen neticenin meydana gelmesinin engellenemedi\u011fi ahvalde bilin\u00e7li taksir s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle, failin neticeyi istememekle beraber neticenin meydana gelmesinin muhtemel oldu\u011funu bilmesine ra\u011fmen duruma kay\u0131ts\u0131z kalarak hareketini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek suretiyle muhtemel neticeyi kabullenmesi durumunda olas\u0131 kast, failin neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rmesine ra\u011fmen becerisine, \u015fans\u0131na, tecr\u00fcbesine ya da ba\u015fka bir etkene g\u00fcvenip neticenin meydana gelmeyece\u011fine inanarak gerekti\u011finde muhtemel neticenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmemesi i\u00e7in gerekli \u00f6nlemleri de almak suretiyle hareketini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmesi h\u00e2linde ise bilin\u00e7li taksir s\u00f6z konusu olacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k Konular\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n
San\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n \u00f6len … ile 17 y\u0131ld\u0131r evli oldu\u011fu, bu evliliklerinden en k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tan\u0131k … olmak \u00fczere d\u00f6rt \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n olaydan k\u0131sa s\u00fcre \u00f6nce cezaevinden tahliye edildi\u011fi, karde\u015fi tan\u0131k … ile birlikte olay\u0131n meydana geldi\u011fi ara\u00e7 kiralama d\u00fckk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay sabah\u0131 i\u015f yeri \u00f6n\u00fcne ara\u00e7 park edilmesi nedeniyle san\u0131kla kimli\u011fi tespit edilemeyen ki\u015filer aras\u0131nda tart\u0131\u015fma \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, tart\u0131\u015fma sonras\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f yerinin asma kat\u0131nda muhafaza etti\u011fi av t\u00fcfe\u011fini, alt kata indirerek at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r h\u00e2le getirdikten sonra alt katta bulunan mutfak tezg\u00e2h\u0131na dayad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu olaydan birka\u00e7 saat sonra \u00f6\u011fle s\u0131ralar\u0131nda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n e\u015fi \u00f6len …\u2019\u0131n sosyal yard\u0131m almak i\u00e7in evden \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 12 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki … ve 4,5 ya\u015f\u0131ndaki … ile birlikte i\u015f yerine gelerek \u00f6\u011fle tatilinin bitip yard\u0131m kurumunun a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u015f saatini bekledi\u011fi, \u00f6len …’\u0131n bir s\u00fcre sonra i\u015f yerinin arka k\u0131sm\u0131ndaki tuvalete girdi\u011fi, tuvalette iken, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sabah vakti at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r h\u00e2lde duvara b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu av t\u00fcfe\u011finin ate\u015f almas\u0131 sonucu g\u00f6\u011f\u00fcs \u00fcst k\u0131sm\u0131na isabet eden toplu sa\u00e7ma giri\u015fi sonucu hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti\u011fi, ilgili uzmanl\u0131k raporlar\u0131nda olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda ate\u015f alan av t\u00fcfe\u011finin herhangi bir mekanik ar\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, t\u00fcfek \u00fczerinde parmak izi tespit edilemedi\u011fi, san\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n her iki el i\u00e7 ve d\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile pantolonunda at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastland\u0131\u011f\u0131, tan\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n sa\u011f el i\u00e7inde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, …’in giysilerinde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131na rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, at\u0131\u015f\u0131n yak\u0131n at\u0131\u015f mesafesinden yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay tarihinde 4,5 ya\u015f\u0131nda olan tan\u0131k …\u2019in av t\u00fcfe\u011fini kald\u0131rabilece\u011fi ve kurulu h\u00e2lde iken teti\u011fi \u00e7ekebilece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, yarg\u0131lama boyunca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kesin \u015fekilde reddetti\u011fi ve t\u00fcfekle oynayan o\u011flu …\u2019in t\u00fcfe\u011fi tuvaletin kap\u0131s\u0131na do\u011frultmas\u0131 \u00fczerine namluya m\u00fcdahale etti\u011fi s\u0131rada t\u00fcfe\u011fin ate\u015f ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, su\u00e7suz oldu\u011funu savundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan dosyada;<\/p>\n
\u00d6lenle san\u0131k aras\u0131nda herhangi bir ciddi sorun bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, aksine \u00f6lenin san\u0131kla \u00e7ok iyi ge\u00e7indi\u011fine ili\u015fkin \u00f6lenin yak\u0131n arkada\u015flar\u0131 ve kom\u015fular\u0131 olan tan\u0131klar S\u0131dd\u0131 Kaya ile Stoiko Siepannido’nun beyanlar\u0131, silah sesini duyar duymaz i\u00e7eri giren san\u0131\u011f\u0131n i\u015f yeri kom\u015fusu tan\u0131k …’un olay \u00f6ncesi tart\u0131\u015fma sesi i\u015fitmedi\u011fi, i\u00e7eri girip ne oldu\u011funu sordu\u011funda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck o\u011flu …\u2019in, karde\u015finin elinde av t\u00fcfe\u011finin patlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve annesinin vuruldu\u011funu s\u00f6yledi\u011fine ili\u015fkin anlat\u0131m\u0131, yine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n; “Han\u0131m\u0131m yaraland\u0131, yard\u0131m edin, ambulans \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131n.” \u015feklindeki s\u00f6zlerle yard\u0131m istedi\u011fine ili\u015fkin ifadesi, san\u0131k ve \u00f6lenin olay tarihinde 4 y\u0131l 8 ayl\u0131k olan m\u00fc\u015fterek \u00e7ocuklar\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’in Ceza Muhakemesi Usul Kanunu’nun emretti\u011fi usul takip edilmeden Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ve 25.01.2012 tarihinde de mahkemede tespit edilen kimi s\u00f6z ve mimiklerine anlam y\u00fcklemek suretiyle al\u0131nan ifadelerinin yasal delil niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131klar\u0131 gibi, beyanlar\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada haz\u0131r bulunan uzman pedagogun, \u00e7ocu\u011fun ya\u015f\u0131 itibar\u0131yla soyut d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi, yer, y\u00f6n ve zaman kavramlar\u0131 geli\u015fmedi\u011finden ifade verme s\u0131ras\u0131nda zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlarda bulundu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki bilimsel tespiti kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda bu beyanlara itibar edilemeyece\u011fi ve h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, …’in at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r h\u00e2ldeki dolu t\u00fcfe\u011fi kald\u0131r\u0131p teti\u011fi \u00e7ekebilece\u011fine dair Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 2. \u0130htisas Kurulunca d\u00fczenlenen raporlar ile olay yerinde yap\u0131lan tatbiki ke\u015fif sonucu d\u00fczenlenen 14.04.2014 tarihli bilirki\u015fi raporundaki; …’in olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu belirtilen (B) noktas\u0131ndan yakla\u015f\u0131k boy uzunlu\u011fu 100 cm olan \u015fahs\u0131n tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131na 160 cm mesafeden, 60 cm bel y\u00fcksekli\u011finden 15 derecelik a\u00e7\u0131yla at\u0131\u015f\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilece\u011fi, tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 \u00fczerindeki plastik k\u0131s\u0131m \u00fczerinde at\u0131\u015f art\u0131\u011f\u0131 kalmas\u0131 i\u00e7in namlu a\u011fz\u0131, tuvalet kap\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki mesafenin en fazla 1 metre olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 da konum olarak (B) noktas\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan at\u0131\u015f\u0131n do\u011frulad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin uzman tespiti birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde; san\u0131k …’\u0131n kusur yetene\u011fi olmayan 4 y\u0131l 8 ayl\u0131k o\u011flu …’i su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesinde ara\u00e7 olarak kullanarak e\u015fi …’\u0131 kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak kesin delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131;
\nAncak; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n asma katta muhafaza edilen av t\u00fcfe\u011fini olay g\u00fcn\u00fc \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n da girip \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f yerinin zemin kat\u0131na indirmi\u015f olmas\u0131, dolu ve at\u0131\u015fa haz\u0131r h\u00e2ldeki av t\u00fcfe\u011fini \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcp ula\u015fabilece\u011fi bir yere b\u0131rakmas\u0131, bu suretle av t\u00fcfe\u011fini bulundu\u011fu yerden al\u0131p oynamaya ba\u015flayan k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck …’in ate\u015f etmesine f\u0131rsat vererek e\u015fi …’\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n neticeyi \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ancak ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini de istemedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan olayda eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
Bu itibarla Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesi isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u00c7o\u011funluk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kat\u0131lmayan be\u015f Ceza Genel Kurulu \u00dcyesi; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle kar\u015f\u0131 oy kullanm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
V. KARAR<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;<\/p>\n
1- Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 10.12.2020 tarihli ve 299-328 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin bilin\u00e7li taksirle bir ki\u015finin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne neden olma su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011funun g\u00f6zetilmemesi isabetsizli\u011finden BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
2- Dosyan\u0131n, mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 28.02.2024 tarihli m\u00fczakerede oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’nun 28.02.2024 tarihli 2022\/198 E. ve 2024\/100 K. say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu 2022\/198 E., 2024\/100 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” D\u0130RENME KARARI VEREN YARGITAY DA\u0130RES\u0130 : 1. Ceza Dairesi MAHKEMES\u0130 :A\u011f\u0131r Ceza SAYISI : 299-328 I. HUKUK\u00ce S\u00dcRE\u00c7 San\u0131k …\u2019\u0131n nitelikli kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrme su\u00e7undan 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nun 82\/1-d, 62\/1, 53, 63, 58\/6-7 ve 54\/1. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na, hak yoksunlu\u011funa, cezas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fckerrirlere \u00f6zg\u00fc infaz rejimine g\u00f6re \u00e7ektirilmesine, mahsuba ve m\u00fcsadereye ili\u015fkin Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 18.07.2012 tarihli ve 262-173 say\u0131l\u0131 resen temyize tabi olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii ve Cumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1. Ceza Dairesince 27.11.2013 tarih ve 3133-6947 say\u0131 ile; “Mahkemece yap\u0131lan 14.06.2012 tarihli ke\u015ffin ve al\u0131nan bilirki\u015fi raporunun su\u00e7un unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde yetersiz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmakla; olay yerinde san\u0131k ve tan\u0131klar ile silahtan anlayan uzman bilirki\u015fi ile adli t\u0131p uzman\u0131 bilirki\u015finin haz\u0131r bulundurularak, manken ki\u015filer de kullan\u0131lmak suretiyle uygulamal\u0131 ke\u015fif yap\u0131lmas\u0131, adli muayene ve otopsi tutana\u011f\u0131, olay yeri krokisi, olay s\u0131ras\u0131nda \u00f6len\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu yer, konumu, isabet alan v\u00fccut b\u00f6lgesi, at\u0131\u015f mesafesi de\u011ferlendirilmek suretiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu denetlendikten sonra, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmeksizin eksik soru\u015fturma sonucu yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,” isabetsizli\u011finden bozulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bozmaya uyan Malatya 2. A\u011f\u0131r …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n