Antalya’da ya\u015fayan Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n, 26 y\u0131l \u00f6nce C.\u00c7. ile evlendikten sonra \u00e7iftin 2001 y\u0131l\u0131nda erkek \u00e7ocu\u011fu d\u00fcnyaya geldi. Y\u0131llar sonra aile i\u00e7inde ya\u015fanan gayrimenkul anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7iftin evlilik birli\u011fine zarar verdi. M\u00fclk tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 s\u00fcrerken, C.\u00c7. ya\u015fanan kavgalar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan evi terk etti. 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00e7ift bo\u015fand\u0131. Ancak dava devam ederken 2007 y\u0131l\u0131nda C.\u00c7. ad\u0131na ‘Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir’ raporu al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Bu durum \u00fczerine Yal\u00e7\u0131n ve avukat\u0131, \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’ndan C.\u00c7.’nin ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin resmi rapor talep etti. Kurum, 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda C.\u00c7.’nin ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin rapor haz\u0131rlad\u0131. Bu geli\u015fmenin ard\u0131ndan 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla ilgili dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n
\u201cDAVA 2006’DAN 2014’E KADAR S\u00dcRD\u00dc\u201d<\/p>\n
1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda C.\u00c7 ile evlendiklerini ve sorunlar\u0131n ard\u0131 ard\u0131na geldi\u011fini belirten Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n, “2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda eski e\u015fim C.\u00c7.’ye bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mak zorunda kald\u0131m. Eski e\u015fim, abisiyle birlikte aileden kalan mallarla kurulan ortak bir \u015firketi y\u00f6netiyordu. Abisi ile aralar\u0131nda mal kavgalar\u0131 oldu. Sonras\u0131nda tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu dava devam ederken, mahkemeye sunulan protokole g\u00f6re baz\u0131 mallar\u0131n bizim \u00fczerimize ge\u00e7mesi gerekiyordu. Ancak bu protokol uygulanmad\u0131. Daha sonra bir gece ans\u0131z\u0131n e\u015fimi evden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131lar. Ben de mecburen bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131m. Ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta sadece bir dosyayla yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131k, ancak s\u00fcre\u00e7 \u00e7ok karma\u015f\u0131k bir hal ald\u0131. Bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 devam ederken al\u0131nan bir raporla e\u015fimin ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edildi. Bu y\u00fczden bo\u015fanma davas\u0131nda hi\u00e7bir \u015fey alamad\u0131m. Dava 2006’dan 2014’e kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fc, ancak sonu\u00e7 olarak ne nafaka ne de maddi- manevi tazminat alabildim” dedi.<\/p>\n
\u201cS\u00dcREKL\u0130 MAHKEMELERLE U\u011eRA\u015eMAK ZORUNDA KALDIM\u201d<\/p>\n
Mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde de eski e\u015fi ile b\u00fcy\u00fck s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Yal\u00e7\u0131n, “Bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 bittikten sonra mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcrecine ge\u00e7tik. Ancak bu a\u015famada da ayn\u0131 raporlar g\u00fcndeme getirildi. E\u015fimin ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle mal edinme hakk\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunuldu. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla hi\u00e7bir hak talep edemedim ve mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131ndan da eli bo\u015f \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131m. Benim kusurum olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, s\u00fcreci y\u00f6netenler y\u00fcksek bir tazminat ve nafaka \u00f6denmemesi i\u00e7in b\u00f6yle bir yol se\u00e7mi\u015flerdi. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te bir\u00e7ok dava a\u00e7t\u0131m, ancak s\u00fcrekli mahkemelerle u\u011fra\u015fmak zorunda kald\u0131m” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.<\/p>\n
‘BEN AKILLANDIM’ DED\u0130 VE EVLEND\u0130R\u0130LD\u0130<\/p>\n
19 y\u0131lda 400 duru\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirten Yal\u00e7\u0131n, “\u015eu anda bo\u015fanma ve mal rejimi davalar\u0131 yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda eski e\u015fimin ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten bir rapor verdi. O\u011flumuz da 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda 18 ya\u015f\u0131na girdi. Babas\u0131n\u0131n mallar\u0131n\u0131 koruyabilmesi i\u00e7in vasi olarak atanmas\u0131n\u0131 talep ettik. Ancak eski e\u015fimin vasisinin avukat\u0131, y\u0131llarca petrol gelirlerinden hi\u00e7bir defter tutmad\u0131 ve g\u00f6revini yerine getirmedi. Eski e\u015fim mahkemeye \u00e7\u0131k\u0131p ‘Ben ak\u0131lland\u0131m’ dedi ve ak\u0131ll\u0131 oldu\u011fu kabul edilerek evlendi. 2018 y\u0131l\u0131ndan beri de evli” diye konu\u015ftu.<\/p>\n
DAVA YEN\u0130DEN G\u00d6R\u00dcLECEK<\/p>\n
Eski e\u015finin ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011funu ve kan\u0131tlad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 kaydeden Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n, \u015f\u00f6yle konu\u015ftu: “Biz de bu geli\u015fmelerin ard\u0131ndan ‘Eski e\u015fim ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 de\u011filse, ge\u00e7mi\u015fte verilen yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n iadesi yap\u0131ls\u0131n’ dedik. Aile mahkemesinde reddedilen dosyam\u0131z istinafa ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131 ve istinaf mahkemesi, \u00e7eli\u015fkileri giderme karar\u0131 verdi. Eski e\u015fim \u015fimdi nisan ay\u0131nda \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’nda tekrar muayene olacak. \u0130stinaf mahkemesi mal rejimi davas\u0131n\u0131 da bozdu. Bu nedenle mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 davas\u0131 sil ba\u015ftan yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclecek. 19 y\u0131ld\u0131r devam eden hukuki m\u00fccadelemizde tam 400 duru\u015fma g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc, ancak net bir sonuca ula\u015famad\u0131k.”<\/p>\n
AKIL SA\u011eLI\u011eI YER\u0130NDED\u0130R KARARI VERD\u0130LER<\/p>\n
Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n’\u0131n 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 yapmaya ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydeden Musa Ba\u015f, “Nil\u00fcfer Han\u0131m 2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda bir bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f. Bu dava devam ederken, 2007 y\u0131l\u0131nda e\u015fi ‘Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131’ gerek\u00e7esiyle k\u0131s\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda kesinle\u015fmi\u015f. M\u00fcvekkil mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 davalar\u0131ndan da sonu\u00e7 alamad\u0131. Bu s\u0131rada \u00e7ocuk koruma ile ilgili 2018’de bir dava a\u00e7t\u0131k. Bu kez de C.\u00c7.’nin ak\u0131lland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle mahkemeye ba\u015fvuruldu. Daha \u00f6nce ‘Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir’ raporu veren kurumlar ‘Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerindedir’ karar\u0131 verdiler ve k\u0131s\u0131t kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Biz de bunun \u00fczerine bir insan\u0131n normal hayat\u0131n ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u00e7inde hem ak\u0131ll\u0131 hem deli olamayaca\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bunun teknik ve t\u0131bbi olarak z\u0131tl\u0131k i\u00e7erdi\u011fini, bu nedenle bo\u015fanma davas\u0131n\u0131n iadesini talep ettik” dedi.<\/p>\n
S\u00dcRE\u00c7 YEN\u0130DEN BA\u015eLADI\u00a0<\/p>\n
Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’ndan C.\u00c7.’nin ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile ilgili haz\u0131rlanan raporu de\u011ferlendiren Musa Ba\u015f, “Dava devam ederken \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 4. \u0130htisas Dairesi verdi\u011fi karar\u0131nda, do\u011fu\u015ftan bir ak\u0131l hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin rapor verdi. Daha sonra b\u00f6lge istinaf mahkemesine gitti. Orada da adli t\u0131p raporu ile ilk al\u0131nan raporlar aras\u0131nda bir \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015ftu\u011fu ve bu \u00e7eli\u015fkinin giderilmesi gerekti\u011fine karar verildi. Ard\u0131ndan daha \u00f6nce verilen kararlar bozuldu. Yani bu ki\u015finin ak\u0131l hastas\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131n\u0131n gayet yerinde oldu\u011funa karar verildi. C.\u00c7. yeniden Adli T\u0131p Genel Kurulu’na muayeneye gidecek. Yine ayn\u0131 karar\u0131n gelece\u011fini d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyoruz. \u015eu anda davalar yeniden g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015fland\u0131” dedi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAntalya\u2019da ya\u015fayan Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n (51), 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda bo\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 eski e\u015fi C.\u00c7. ile 19 y\u0131ld\u0131r hukuk m\u00fccadelesi veriyor. Eski e\u015fi hakk\u0131nda ‘Akli dengesi yerinde de\u011fildir’ raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131yla mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131 ve tazminat taleplerini i\u00e7eren 400 duru\u015fmada sonu\u00e7 alamayan Yal\u00e7\u0131n, tekrardan hukuk m\u00fccadelesine ba\u015flad\u0131.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u200bHaberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.antalyakorfez.com<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Antalya’da ya\u015fayan Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n, 26 y\u0131l \u00f6nce C.\u00c7. ile evlendikten sonra \u00e7iftin 2001 y\u0131l\u0131nda erkek \u00e7ocu\u011fu d\u00fcnyaya geldi. Y\u0131llar sonra aile i\u00e7inde ya\u015fanan gayrimenkul anla\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00e7iftin evlilik birli\u011fine zarar verdi. M\u00fclk tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 s\u00fcrerken, C.\u00c7. ya\u015fanan kavgalar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan evi terk etti. 2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00e7ift bo\u015fand\u0131. Ancak dava devam ederken 2007 y\u0131l\u0131nda C.\u00c7. ad\u0131na ‘Ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir’ raporu al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Bu durum \u00fczerine Yal\u00e7\u0131n ve avukat\u0131, \u0130stanbul Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’ndan C.\u00c7.’nin ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin resmi rapor talep etti. Kurum, 2018 y\u0131l\u0131nda C.\u00c7.’nin ak\u0131l sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yerinde oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin rapor haz\u0131rlad\u0131. Bu geli\u015fmenin ard\u0131ndan 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda mal payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131yla ilgili dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131. \u201cDAVA 2006’DAN 2014’E KADAR S\u00dcRD\u00dc\u201d 1999 y\u0131l\u0131nda C.\u00c7 ile evlendiklerini ve sorunlar\u0131n ard\u0131 ard\u0131na geldi\u011fini belirten Nil\u00fcfer Yal\u00e7\u0131n, “2006 y\u0131l\u0131nda eski e\u015fim C.\u00c7.’ye bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7mak zorunda kald\u0131m. Eski e\u015fim, abisiyle birlikte aileden kalan mallarla kurulan ortak bir \u015firketi y\u00f6netiyordu. Abisi ile aralar\u0131nda mal kavgalar\u0131 oldu. Sonras\u0131nda tapu iptali ve tescil davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda bu dava devam ederken, mahkemeye sunulan protokole g\u00f6re baz\u0131 mallar\u0131n bizim \u00fczerimize ge\u00e7mesi gerekiyordu. Ancak bu protokol uygulanmad\u0131. Daha sonra bir gece ans\u0131z\u0131n e\u015fimi evden uzakla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131lar. Ben de mecburen bo\u015fanma davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131m. Ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta sadece bir dosyayla yola \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131k, ancak s\u00fcre\u00e7 \u00e7ok karma\u015f\u0131k bir hal ald\u0131. Bo\u015fanma …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-40143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-gundem"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n