T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
SITKI YUMU\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40945)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 14\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Zehra GAYRETL\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
S\u0131tk\u0131 YUMU\u015e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ertu\u011frul Cem C\u0130HAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza davas\u0131nda esasl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n gerek\u00e7ede de\u011ferlendirilmemesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. 1971 do\u011fumlu olan ba\u015fvurucu, T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri (TSK) b\u00fcnyesinde \u015eanl\u0131urfa \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda astsubay olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken emeklili\u011fe ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n (FET\u00d6\/PDY) Jandarma Genel Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahrem \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesi hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesi al\u0131nan Ramiz kod adl\u0131 H.K., etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden faydalanma talebiyle kollukta verdi\u011fi ifadesinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015ftur. H.K. ifadesinde \u00f6zetle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn mahrem asker yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda astsubaylardan sorumlu \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fini, bu g\u00f6revlendirme kapsam\u0131nda 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 Nisan ay\u0131ndan itibaren Konya’daki astsubaylarla ilgilendi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun da Konya \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan ve kendisine ba\u011fl\u0131 olan astsubaylardan biri olabilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucuyu 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda Akif kod isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun Sad\u0131k kod ad\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, memleketini K\u0131r\u0131kkale olarak bildi\u011fini, o d\u00f6nemde lisede okuyan bir \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu\u011funu ve arabas\u0131n\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ba\u015fvurucuyu foto\u011fraftan te\u015fhis etmi\u015ftir. H.K. beyan\u0131n\u0131n devam\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun ikamet etti\u011fi adresini “Konya Kule Site yak\u0131n\u0131” olarak belirtmi\u015f ve 2013 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra ba\u015fvurucuyu \u0130sa kod adl\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubuna devretti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Soru\u015fturma sonucunda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun ve H.K.n\u0131n da oldu\u011fu \u00e7ok say\u0131da \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn asker\u00ee mahrem yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda detayl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunduktan sonra H.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi beyana at\u0131f yaparak ba\u015fvurucunun astsubay olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde \u00f6rg\u00fctsel olarak abisi olan \u00fcstleri ile d\u00fczenli \u015fekilde gizli toplant\u0131lar yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu toplant\u0131larda ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 emirlere g\u00f6re hareket etti\u011fi, kurumuyla ilgili bilgileri abisine aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u015fekilde \u00f6\u011fretmene ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak FET\u00d6\/PDY’nin mahrem asker yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ankara 23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclen davan\u0131n duru\u015fmas\u0131 on bir celsede tamamlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Duru\u015fman\u0131n birinci celsesinde beyan\u0131 al\u0131nan H.K. soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda verdi\u011fi ifadeyi tekrar ederek \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn mahrem asker yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda Konya’da astsubaylardan sorumlu \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fi 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuyla tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 2010-2011 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ayda bir kez olmak \u00fczere g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcklerini, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131ndan sonra ise ba\u015fvurucuyu ba\u015fka bir \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubuna devretti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucunun K\u0131r\u0131kkaleli olup iki \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu\u011funu, “\u0130l Jandarmaya 2-3 km mesafede bir yerde” ikamet etti\u011fini hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ayn\u0131 celsede H.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 savunmas\u0131 al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu ise H.K.y\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, H.K.n\u0131n kendisiyle ilgili verdi\u011fi bilgilerin \u00e7eli\u015fkili oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek su\u00e7lamay\u0131 kabul etmemi\u015ftir. Duru\u015fma salonunda haz\u0131r bulunan ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii ise H.K.ya baz\u0131 sorular y\u00f6neltmi\u015ftir. Duru\u015fma Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafiinin y\u00f6neltti\u011fi sorulara kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k olarak H.K. ba\u015fvurucunun K\u0131r\u0131kkaleli oldu\u011funu, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrede iki \u00e7ocu\u011fu oldu\u011funu, Konya’n\u0131n Karatay il\u00e7esinde \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na yak\u0131n bir adreste ikamet etti\u011fini ancak a\u00e7\u0131k adresini bilmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. Bu cevap \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii H.K.n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama a\u015famalar\u0131nda verdi\u011fi beyanlardaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili hususlara Mahkemenin dikkatini \u00e7ekerek ba\u015fvurucunun K\u0131r\u015fehirli oldu\u011funu, 2015 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar m\u00fclkiyetinde bir otomobilin bulundu\u011funu, kay\u0131tlara bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda bunlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6r\u00fclebilece\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun ikamet adresinin ve \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n da soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131nda H.K. taraf\u0131ndan hatal\u0131 belirtildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
7. Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131 sonucunda Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan 7 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015f; gerek\u00e7eli kararda H.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131na dayan\u0131larak ba\u015fvurucunun \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn d\u00fczenledi\u011fi sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ve kod ad\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct ideolojisini benimsemek suretiyle \u00f6rg\u00fctle organik ba\u011f kurdu\u011funu g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f, ayr\u0131ca H.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frulu\u011fu hakk\u0131nda da de\u011ferlendirmelerde bulunmu\u015ftur. Bu ba\u011flamda H.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun hangi te\u015fkilatta \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, medeni durumu, \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131, ikamet adresi ve \u00f6rg\u00fctte kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kod ad\u0131 gibi konularda ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 bilgi verebilmesinin bu beyan\u0131n hayal \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mahkeme; ba\u015fvurucunun H.K.y\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda ise H.K.n\u0131n sahip oldu\u011fu bilgilerin ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131madan elde edilemeyece\u011fini, beyan\u0131n somut veriler ile de desteklendi\u011fini, bu suretle beyanlar\u0131n do\u011fru kabul edilerek beyanlara itibar edildi\u011fini gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; istinaf ve temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinde di\u011ferlerinin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra H.K.n\u0131n kendisi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi bilgilerin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, yarg\u0131lama a\u015famalar\u0131nda bu beyanlardaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili hususlara ve hatal\u0131 noktalara dikkat \u00e7ekmesine ra\u011fmen Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda s\u00f6z konusu iddia ve itirazlar\u0131 hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, H.K. ya foto\u011fraftan yapt\u0131r\u0131lan te\u015fhis i\u015fleminin ilgili mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu ba\u011flamda g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc\u015f itibar\u0131yla kendisine benzer olan birden fazla ki\u015finin foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131n kendisinin foto\u011fraf\u0131yla birlikte g\u00f6sterilmesi suretiyle te\u015fhis yapt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekirken bu hususa uyulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, duru\u015fmada da bu itiraz\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc halde Mahkemece de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, di\u011fer bir ifadeyle te\u015fhis i\u015flemine ili\u015fkin savunmas\u0131n\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Karar, istinaf ve temyiz a\u015famalar\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erek kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu 20\/7\/2021 tarihinde nihai karar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 30\/7\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
11. Komisyon ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu; ayn\u0131 davada san\u0131k olan H.K.n\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden faydalanma talebiyle verdi\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve \u00e7eli\u015fkili beyanlara istinaden cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ki\u015finin beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n oturdu\u011fu adres, \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131, memleketi ve arabas\u0131n\u0131n olup olmamas\u0131 gibi hususlarda yanl\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu, bu konularda yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n ise mahkemelerce kar\u015f\u0131lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
13. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinin delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesine ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olaylar\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan hukuki nitelendirmesi ile ba\u011fl\u0131 olmay\u0131p olay ve olgular\u0131n hukuki tavsifini kendisi takdir eder (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 16). Ba\u015fvurucu; yarg\u0131lama a\u015famalar\u0131ndaki beyanlar\u0131 aleyhinde delil olarak kullan\u0131lan H.K.n\u0131n kendisi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi bilgilerin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015f ancak bu bilgilerin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funun ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in gerekli ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir talepte bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, talepte bulunmu\u015f ise bu talebin mahkemelerce hangi y\u00f6nde de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bireysel ba\u015fvuru formunda herhangi bir \u015fik\u00e2yete yer vermemi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu temel olarak davan\u0131n esas\u0131na etkili iddia ve itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli kararda kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131ndan yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuru karar sonucunu etkileyecek esasl\u0131 bir iddian\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli kararda kar\u015f\u0131lanmamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131n\u0131n adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesinin uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
16. Anayasa Mahkemesi, \u00f6n\u00fcne gelen bir\u00e7ok ba\u015fvuruda gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n kapsam ve i\u00e7eri\u011fini belirlemi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi \u00f6zellikle a\u00e7\u0131k ve somut bir bi\u00e7imde \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n davan\u0131n sonucuna etkili olmas\u0131, ba\u015fka bir deyi\u015fle davan\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde davayla do\u011frudan ilgili olan bu hususlara mahkemelerce makul bir gerek\u00e7e ile yan\u0131t verilmesi gerekti\u011fine dikkat \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir (Muhittin Kaya ve Muhittin Kaya \u0130n\u015faat Taahh\u00fct Madencilik G\u0131da Turizm Pazarlama Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd. \u015eti., B. No: 2013\/1213, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 25, 26; Vesim Parlak, B. No: 2012\/1034, 20\/3\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 33, 34; Yasemin Ek\u015fi, B. No: 2013\/5486, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7\u00a7 56, 57; Sencer Ba\u015fat ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/7800, 18\/6\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 31-39; M\u00fcn\u00fcr Ata, B. No: 2014\/4958, 22\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 37-43; Hikmet \u00c7elik ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/4894, 15\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 54-59; \u015eah Tar\u0131m \u0130n\u015f. Tur. Ltd. \u015eti., B. No: 2013\/7847, 9\/3\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 36-48).<\/p>\n
17. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn mahrem asker yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7inde astsubaylardan sorumlu \u00f6\u011fretmen oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan H.K.n\u0131n d\u00fczenledi\u011fi sohbet toplant\u0131lar\u0131na kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu ki\u015finin hiyerar\u015fisine tabi oldu\u011fu ve kod ad\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyeli\u011fi su\u00e7undan mahk\u0217m edilmi\u015ftir. Kararda; ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011finin ayn\u0131 davada san\u0131k olan H.K.n\u0131n etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden yararlanma talebiyle soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi bilgiler do\u011frultusunda tespit edildi\u011fi ifade edilmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 7). H.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi bilgiler ise genel olarak ba\u015fvurucunun memleketinin K\u0131r\u0131kkale oldu\u011fu, kendisini tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 d\u00f6nemde ara\u00e7 sahibi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re bir, kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re iki \u00e7ocuk sahibi oldu\u011fu, ikamet adresinin bir beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re “Konya Kule Site yak\u0131n\u0131”, di\u011fer beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re Konya’da “\u0130l Jandarmaya 2-3 km mesafede bir yerde” oldu\u011fudur (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 3, 5).<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu savunmas\u0131nda; H.K.n\u0131n kendisiyle 2010-2011 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda ayda bir kez olmak \u00fczere d\u00fczenli bir \u015fekilde g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc iddia etmesine ra\u011fmen kendisi hakk\u0131nda verdi\u011fi bilgilerin ger\u00e7e\u011fe uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun H.K.n\u0131n kendisini tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, nitekim kendisinin de bu ki\u015fiyi tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvurucu m\u00fcdafii H.K.ya duru\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda soru y\u00f6nelterek verdi\u011fi bilgilerdeki ger\u00e7e\u011fe uygun olmayan hususlara Mahkemenin dikkatini \u00e7ekmi\u015f; bu ba\u011flamda ba\u015fvurucunun memleketinin K\u0131r\u0131kkale de\u011fil K\u0131r\u015fehir oldu\u011fu, 2015 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar m\u00fclkiyetinde bir ara\u00e7 oldu\u011fu, ikamet adresinin ve \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 da H.K.n\u0131n hatal\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011fi, kay\u0131tlar\u0131n kontrol edilmesi durumunda bu hususlar\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 dile getirmi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 6). Ba\u015fvurucu ayr\u0131ca foto\u011fraftan yapt\u0131r\u0131lan te\u015fhis i\u015fleminin ilgili mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu yarg\u0131lama a\u015famalar\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz. \u00a7 8).<\/p>\n
19. Ba\u015fvurucunun savunmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda Mahkeme, H.K.n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda bilgi sahibi oldu\u011fu konular\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuyu tan\u0131madan elde edilebilecek bilgiler olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, beyanlar\u0131n olgulara ve olaylara dayal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu nedenlere H.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru kabul edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015f; bununla birlikte hangi somut veriye dayanarak beyan\u0131 do\u011fru kabul etti\u011fi hususunda karar gerek\u00e7esinde bir a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yer vermemi\u015ftir. Nitekim ba\u015fvurucu; H.K.n\u0131n beyanlar\u0131nda kendisiyle ilgili bilgilerde baz\u0131 hatal\u0131 noktalar oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekerek memleketi, \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131, m\u00fclkiyetinde ara\u00e7 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi konulara ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar\u0131n incelenmesi h\u00e2linde do\u011fru bilgilere ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funu dile getirmi\u015f ise de Mahkeme, ba\u015fvurucunun ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bu iddia hakk\u0131nda herhangi bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna ek olarak ba\u015fvurucunun, te\u015fhis i\u015fleminin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda da Mahkemece bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. Di\u011fer bir ifadeyle ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131 karar\u0131n sonucunu de\u011fi\u015ftirebilecek nitelikte oldu\u011fu h\u00e2lde Mahkeme bu iddia hakk\u0131nda somut bir de\u011ferlendirmede bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan iddia ve talepler kanun yolu a\u015famas\u0131nda da kar\u015f\u0131lanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
20. Buna g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucunun ayr\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k bir yan\u0131t verilmesini gerektiren (oturdu\u011fu adres, \u00e7ocuk say\u0131s\u0131, memleketi ve arabas\u0131n\u0131n olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi) konularda ger\u00e7e\u011fe uygun olmayan bilgiler veren tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n bu bilgileri ihtiva eden te\u015fhisine dayan\u0131larak cezaland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair iddias\u0131 ayr\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k olarak tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve kar\u015f\u0131lanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stinaf ve temyiz incelemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda da bu eksikli\u011fin telafi edilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu nedenle yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcreci bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde ba\u015fvurucunun gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
21. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
22. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
23. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen anayasal hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar ve zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r. Anayasa’n\u0131n 148. ve 153. maddeleri ile 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. ve 66. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca ihlal karar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flat\u0131p Anayasa Mahkemesinin ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere ve gerek\u00e7elere uygun bi\u00e7imde y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek yarg\u0131lama sonunda hak ihlalinin nedenlerini gidererek yeni bir karar vermektir (yeniden yarg\u0131lama konusunda bkz. Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
24. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, reddine ya da beraate veya mahk\u00fbmiyete karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131lama sonunda da delillerin dava ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili mahkemelere aittir.<\/p>\n
25. \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat talebinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa’n\u0131n 36. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin gerek\u00e7eli karar hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere Ankara 23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2017\/8, K.2018\/113) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucunun tazminat talebinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin BA\u015eVURUCUYA \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 14\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 14\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/40945 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 SITKI YUMU\u015e BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/40945) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 14\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Zehra GAYRETL\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucu : S\u0131tk\u0131 YUMU\u015e Vekili : Av. Ertu\u011frul Cem C\u0130HAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ceza davas\u0131nda esasl\u0131 iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n gerek\u00e7ede de\u011ferlendirilmemesi nedeniyle adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. 1971 do\u011fumlu olan ba\u015fvurucu, T\u00fcrk Silahl\u0131 Kuvvetleri (TSK) b\u00fcnyesinde \u015eanl\u0131urfa \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda astsubay olarak g\u00f6rev yapmakta iken emeklili\u011fe ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131n\u0131n (FET\u00d6\/PDY) Jandarma Genel Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 mahrem \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesi hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla ifadesi al\u0131nan Ramiz kod adl\u0131 H.K., etkin pi\u015fmanl\u0131k h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden faydalanma talebiyle kollukta verdi\u011fi ifadesinde ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda da a\u00e7\u0131klamalarda bulunmu\u015ftur. H.K. ifadesinde \u00f6zetle \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn mahrem asker yap\u0131lanmas\u0131nda astsubaylardan sorumlu \u00f6\u011fretmen olarak g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fini, bu g\u00f6revlendirme kapsam\u0131nda 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 Nisan ay\u0131ndan itibaren Konya’daki astsubaylarla ilgilendi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun da Konya \u0130l Jandarma Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda g\u00f6rev yapan ve kendisine ba\u011fl\u0131 olan astsubaylardan biri olabilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucuyu 2010 y\u0131l\u0131nda Akif kod isimli \u00f6rg\u00fct mensubu arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun Sad\u0131k kod …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n