T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B.E. BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/45041)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
B.E.<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Habibe YILMAZ KAYAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7undan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu B.E. 1986 do\u011fumludur.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, 12\/9\/2012 tarihinde duygusal birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E.E.nin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 19\/2\/2013tarihinde \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Olay tarihinden yakla\u015f\u0131k sekiz ay \u00f6nce tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 E.E. ile sevgili olmu\u015f, daha \u00f6nce de iste\u011fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f, bu cinsel ili\u015fki nedeniyle v\u00fccudunda kramplar ve titremeler olu\u015fmu\u015f, intihar etmeye dahi kalk\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. E.E.ye cinsel ili\u015fki ya\u015famak istemedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi h\u00e2lde E.E. bunu kabul etmemi\u015f ve psikolojik destek almas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
ii. Olay tarihinde E.E. uzun s\u00fcreli \u015fehir d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra almas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek kendisinde kalan hard diskini almas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine E.E.nin evine hard diskini almak i\u00e7in gitmi\u015f, ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine E.E. ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 reddederek evden \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131 engellemi\u015f, duvar\u0131 yumruklay\u0131p ba\u011f\u0131rmaya ba\u015flam\u0131\u015f, bunun \u00fczerine paniklemi\u015f, v\u00fccudu ve zihni kilitlenmi\u015ftir. E.E. bu durumundan faydalanarak kendisiyle zorla cinsel ili\u015fkiye girmi\u015f ve bu s\u00fcreci kameraya \u00e7ekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. 13\/9\/2012 tarihinde arkada\u015f\u0131 J.V. ile hastaneye giderek muayene olmu\u015ftur. \u015eik\u00e2yeti ile birlikte muayene sonucu ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 raporu sunmak istemi\u015f, rapor haz\u0131r olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet raporun teslimine kadar gecikmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. E.E., 15\/9\/2012 tarihinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 cep telefonuna “\u00c7ok pi\u015fman\u0131m, ne yapsam faydas\u0131 yok, bekledi\u011fin gibi ne i\u011fren\u00e7 bir adam oldu\u011fumu g\u00f6rd\u00fcn i\u015fte, umar\u0131m zaman yard\u0131mc\u0131 olur.” \u015feklinde mesaj atm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucunun, eski sevgilisi E.E.nin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetiyle \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Ana Bilim Dal\u0131na 13\/9\/2012 tarihinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru neticesinde al\u0131nan 4\/2\/2013 tarihli raporda “…mukozada saptanan pete\u015fiyal kanama ve himenal k\u0131vr\u0131mdaki \u00f6demli ve \u015fi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn ki\u015finin aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131 akut cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fc ile uyumlu oldu\u011fu…”\u015feklinde tespit bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yeti \u00fczerine ba\u015flat\u0131lan soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda kollukta ifadesi al\u0131nan \u015f\u00fcpheli E.E., ba\u015fvurucu ile yakla\u015f\u0131k 1 y\u0131ld\u0131r kar\u0131-koca ili\u015fkisi ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te ba\u015fvurucunun r\u0131zas\u0131yla cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdiklerini, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc de cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun dini inanc\u0131 nedeniyle pi\u015fmanl\u0131k duyup kendisini su\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay tarihindeki cinsel ili\u015fkinin ba\u015fvurucunun iste\u011fi ve r\u0131zas\u0131yla ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucu Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131ktaki ifadesinde \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esindeki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 yinelemi\u015ftir. \u0130fade tutana\u011f\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli E.E.nin ba\u015fvurucunun cep telefonuna att\u0131\u011f\u0131 mesaj i\u00e7eri\u011finin (bkz. \u00a7 3\/iv) g\u00f6r\u00fclerek tutanak alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Sulh ceza mahkemesince \u015f\u00fcpheli E.E.nin ikamet ve i\u015fyeri adresleri ile cep telefonu ve di\u011fer bili\u015fim aletlerinde ba\u015fvurucuya yap\u0131lan cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin elde edilebilmesi i\u00e7in arama yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, arama neticesinde elde edilecek t\u00fcm su\u00e7 unsuru e\u015fyaya el konulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. Yap\u0131lan arama sonucunda su\u00e7a ve su\u00e7 unsuruna rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tutanak tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, 4\/2\/2013 tarihli raporda yer alan tespitin (bkz. \u00a7 4) t\u0131bben ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6stergesi olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Ana Bilim Dal\u0131ndan ek rapor talep etmi\u015ftir. Ana Bilim Dal\u0131n\u0131n 25\/2\/2013 tarihli ek raporunda “…genital b\u00f6lgede b\u00fcy\u00fck dudaklar\u0131n i\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda saptanan noktasal kanama ve himenal kenardaki \u00f6demli ve \u015fi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn akut cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 bulgusu olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilece\u011fi…” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Mor \u00c7at\u0131 Kad\u0131n S\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u011f\u0131 Vakf\u0131n\u0131n 8\/3\/2013tarihliyaz\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Kas\u0131m ay\u0131nda Mor \u00c7at\u0131 Kad\u0131n S\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u011f\u0131 Vakf\u0131na ba\u015fvurarak psikolojik destek talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Yap\u0131lan ilk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmede travma sonras\u0131 stres bozuklu\u011fu ile uyumlu belirtiler sergilendi\u011fi g\u00f6zlemlenmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan yaz\u0131ya g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, 23\/11\/2012 tarihinden bu yana haftada bir kez d\u00fczenli olarak travma terapisi g\u00f6rmektedir. Yine \u00f6zel bir hastanenin 11\/12\/2012 tarihli psikiyatri muayene formunda ba\u015fvurucunun erkek arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, uykular\u0131n\u0131n bozuldu\u011fu, kabuslar g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc anlatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 13\/5\/2013 tarihli iddianameyle \u015f\u00fcpheli E.E. hakk\u0131nda nitelikli cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada dinlenen tan\u0131k J.V. ba\u015fvurucunun yak\u0131n arkada\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011funu, ba\u015fvurucunun olay gecesi 04.30’da sa\u00e7lar\u0131 \u0131slak \u015fekilde evine geldi\u011fini, \u015fokta oldu\u011funu, psikolojik durumunun iyi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, E.E.nin kendisine tecav\u00fcz etti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fini, ertesi g\u00fcn ba\u015fvurucuyu hastaneye g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ifade etmi\u015ftir. Tan\u0131klar S.\u00c7. ve K.A. ba\u015fvurucunun beyanlar\u0131yla uyumlu ifade vererek olay\u0131n ertesi g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015fvurucu ile yapt\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri aktarm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. San\u0131k E.E. yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucu ile daha \u00f6nce de cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fvurucunun bu birlikteliklerinden sonra da tepki g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini, ba\u015fvurucunun kendisine intihar edece\u011fine ili\u015fkin “08\/2012” tarihli intihar mektubu ve tarihsiz “Sevgilim, ruhum, sen asla pi\u015fman olma, mutlu ol, seni seviyorum” ibarelerini i\u00e7eren, el yaz\u0131s\u0131yla yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f iki sayfal\u0131k mektup b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek mektuplar\u0131 dosyaya ibraz etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; mektuplardaki el yaz\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine ait oldu\u011funu, olay tarihinden \u00f6nce yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
12. Mahkemenin ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 eylemi sonucunda beden ve ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda rapor talep etmesi \u00fczerine Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 6. Adli T\u0131p \u0130htisas Kurulu (Adli T\u0131p Kurumu) 30\/10\/2013 tarihli raporuyla ba\u015fvurucuda anksiyeteli major depresif bozuklu\u011fun (k\u0131smen remisyonda) tespit edildi\u011fi, ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 etkileyecek mahiyet ve derecede olan bu psikiyatrik bozuklu\u011fun iddia edildi\u011fi gibi bir cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak geli\u015febilece\u011fi gibi cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015fka olay ve\/veya olaylara, ili\u015fki sorunlar\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak geli\u015fen psikososyal stres ve \u00e7at\u0131\u015fmalar sonucunda da ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fi, bunlar aras\u0131nda Kurulca ay\u0131r\u0131m yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finin Mahkemece s\u00fcbutu ve tespiti h\u00e2linde ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki mevcut etkilenmenin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 geli\u015fti\u011finin kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
13. Yarg\u0131lama sonucunda Mahkeme, 15\/4\/2014 tarihli karar\u0131yla san\u0131k E.E.nin \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fine dair mahk\u00fbmiyetini gerektirecek nitelikte delil bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirerek beraat karar\u0131 vermi\u015ftir. Karar gerek\u00e7esinin ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“San\u0131k ile m\u00fc\u015ftekinin duygusal anlamda arkada\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, bu arkada\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 daha da ileri g\u00f6t\u00fcrerek cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdikleri, san\u0131k cinsel ili\u015fkinin m\u00fc\u015ftekinin r\u0131zas\u0131 ile oldu\u011funu belirtmekte iken, m\u00fc\u015fteki ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kendisine zor kullanmak sureti ile cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdi\u011fini iddia etmekte, ma\u011fdurenin psikolojik sorunlar\u0131 oldu\u011fu, bu psikolojik sorunlar\u0131n\u0131n 08.12.2012 tarihli mektubundan da anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, mektup i\u00e7eri\u011finde san\u0131ktan ‘sevgilim, ruhum, sen asla pi\u015fman olma, mutlu ol, seni seviyorum’ ibarelerini i\u00e7erdi\u011fi, mahkememize sunulan E-mail mesajlar\u0131nda da, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin cinsel sorunlar\u0131 nedeni ile psikolojik destek ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc de m\u00fc\u015ftekinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n evine kendi arzusu ile \u00f6nceden haber vermek sureti ile gitti\u011fi ve yine evde taraflar\u0131n r\u0131zalar\u0131 ile cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdikleri kanaatine var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, m\u00fc\u015ftekiye kar\u015f\u0131 zorla cinsel istismar su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fine dair, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin iddialar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka kesin, somut ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil elde edilememi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 nitelikli cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fi hususu \u015f\u00fcphe halinde kalm\u0131\u015f, \u015f\u00fcpheden de san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r ceza hukuku genel ilkesi gere\u011fince, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n her iki su\u00e7tan beraatine… [karar verilmi\u015ftir.]”<\/p>\n
14. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili beraat karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015f, temyize konu karar Yarg\u0131tay 14. Ceza Dairesinin19\/4\/2021 tarihli karar\u0131yla onanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 7\/9\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 30\/9\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. <\/p>\n
16. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucu; ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n makul s\u00fcrede tamamlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Mahkemenin tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131, E.E.nin pi\u015fman oldu\u011funu belirten 15\/9\/2012 tarihli mesaj\u0131n\u0131, 23\/11\/2022 tarihinden itibaren her hafta psikolojik travma tedavisi g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olarak Mor \u00c7at\u0131 Kad\u0131n S\u0131\u011f\u0131na\u011f\u0131 Vakf\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen evrak\u0131 ve t\u0131bbi raporlar\u0131 g\u00f6rmezden gelerek karar verdi\u011fini belirterek anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 iddias\u0131 hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131n etkilili\u011fine ili\u015fkindir. Cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik eylemler, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda inceleme yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in gerekli olan asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k e\u015fi\u011fine do\u011fas\u0131 gere\u011fi ula\u015f\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvuru, k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
20. \u0130nsan onurunun korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin ilk f\u0131kras\u0131nda maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n korunmas\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesi hakk\u0131 g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015f; ayn\u0131 maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131yla da ki\u015filere i\u015fkence ve eziyet yap\u0131lmas\u0131, ki\u015filerin insan haysiyetiyle ba\u011fda\u015fmayan bir cezaya veya muameleye tabi tutulmas\u0131 yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu yasak i\u00e7in herhangi bir istisnan\u0131n kabul edilmemesi ve Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 15. maddesinde sava\u015f, seferberlik veya ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc h\u00e2llerde de maddi ve manevi varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dokunulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131n mutlak niteli\u011fini ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte yasak, t\u00fcm k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele durumlar\u0131n\u0131 kapsamaz. Bir muamelenin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131na girebilmesi, asgari bir a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine (ciddiyet seviyesine) ula\u015fmas\u0131na ba\u011fl\u0131d\u0131r. Asgari a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131k derecesine ula\u015f\u0131l\u0131p ula\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, g\u00f6recelidir ve somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesiyle belirlenir. Yap\u0131lacak de\u011ferlendirmede muamelenin s\u00fcresi, fiziksel ve ruhsal etkileri ile ma\u011fdurun cinsiyeti, ya\u015f\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131k durumu gibi etkenler \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r. Bu etkenlere ard\u0131ndaki kas\u0131t veya saik ile birlikte muamelenin amac\u0131 da eklenebilir. Ayr\u0131ca gerilimin ve duygular\u0131n y\u00fckseldi\u011fi atmosfer gibi muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u011flam da dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken di\u011fer bir etkendir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/293, 17\/7\/2014, \u00a7\u00a7 80, 83; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/3924, 6\/1\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 72, 74, 75; K.K. [GK], B. No: 2020\/34532, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7 26).<\/p>\n
21. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesi, devletin temel ama\u00e7 ve g\u00f6revlerini d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 5. maddesiyle birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde devlete birtak\u0131m negatif ve pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckler y\u00fckler (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2012\/752, 17\/9\/2013, \u00a7 50; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 82). Pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fckleri kapsam\u0131nda devlet; bireyleri, di\u011fer bireyler taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lanlar da d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere, k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye kar\u015f\u0131 korumak i\u00e7in hukuki ve fiil\u00ee tedbirler almakla \u00f6devlidir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 82; R.K., B. No: 2013\/6950, 20\/4\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 74, 75). \u00d6zellikle \u00e7ocuklar ve savunmas\u0131z bireyler etkili bir \u015fekilde korunmal\u0131d\u0131r (Z.C. [GK], B. No: 2013\/3262, 11\/5\/2016, \u00a7 84). Koruma \u00f6devi en ciddi durumlarda ceza hukuku h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe konulmas\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n uygulamada da etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131 yoluyla bireyleri maddi ve manevi b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fcklerinin ihlallerinden yeterli \u015fekilde korumak i\u00e7in yasal bir \u00e7er\u00e7eve olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. Z.C. \u00a7 56; ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan k\u0131smen benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. \u0130pek Deniz ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2013\/1595, 21\/4\/2016, \u00a7 149; T.A. [GK], B. No: 2017\/32972, 29\/9\/2021, \u00a7 135). Koruma \u00f6devi ayr\u0131ca yetkililerin bir ki\u015fiye y\u00f6nelik ger\u00e7ek ve yak\u0131n bir k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele tehlikesini bildikleri veya bilmelerinin gerekti\u011fi durumlarda bu tehlikenin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini engellemek i\u00e7in makul tedbirler almalar\u0131n\u0131 da gerektirir (Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 82; R.K., \u00a7 74). Bununla birlikte \u00f6zellikle insan davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclemezli\u011fi, \u00f6ncelikler ve kaynaklar de\u011ferlendirilerek yap\u0131lacak i\u015flem veya y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclecek faaliyet tercihi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda koruma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn kamu makamlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 y\u00fck olu\u015fturacak \u015fekilde yorumlanmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Serpil Kerimo\u011flu ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7 53; R.K., \u00a7 76).<\/p>\n
22. Devletin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki pozitif y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinin usuli bir y\u00f6n\u00fc de vard\u0131r. Bu usul y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, savunulabilir nitelikteki her k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele olay\u0131n\u0131n sorumlular\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesini ve gerekiyorsa cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flayabilecek etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi gerektirir. Bu soru\u015fturman\u0131n temel amac\u0131, insan onurunu koruyan hukukun etkili bir \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve kamu g\u00f6revlilerinin veya di\u011fer bireylerin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele niteli\u011findeki filleri nedeniyle hesap vermelerini sa\u011flamakt\u0131r. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin kasten yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc durumlarda iddia hakk\u0131nda ivedilikle bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flat\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gerektirdi\u011fi \u015fekilde etkili oldu\u011funun kabul edilebilmesi i\u00e7in soru\u015fturmada olay\u0131 ayd\u0131nlatabilecek ve sorumlular\u0131n belirlenmesini sa\u011flayabilecek t\u00fcm deliller toplanmal\u0131d\u0131r. Dahas\u0131 soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci gerekti\u011fi \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde kamu denetimine a\u00e7\u0131k olmal\u0131, ma\u011fdur soru\u015fturmaya etkili \u015fekilde kat\u0131labilmeli vesoru\u015fturmada makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle hareket edilmelidir. Yetkililer, soru\u015fturmay\u0131 sonland\u0131rmak i\u00e7in aceleci davranmamal\u0131 ve temelden yoksun sonu\u00e7lara dayanmamal\u0131d\u0131r (Tahir Canan, B. No: 2012\/969, 18\/9\/2013, \u00a7 25; Cezmi Demir ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 110-112, 114-117; Ali R\u0131za \u00d6zer ve di\u011ferleri, \u00a7\u00a7 101-103).<\/p>\n
23. Olas\u0131 cezai sorumlulu\u011fun tespiti ad\u0131na y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma sonras\u0131nda kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f ise bu a\u015faman\u0131n da Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin gereklerine cevap verebilecek nitelikte olmas\u0131 gerekir (Filiz Aka, B. No: 2013\/8365, 10\/6\/2015, \u00a7 30; Fatma Ak\u0131n ve Mehmet Eren [GK], B. No: 2017\/26636, 10\/11\/2021, \u00a7 100).<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu, yaln\u0131zca ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinin etkisizli\u011finden yak\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan inceleme k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutu kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. Ba\u015fvurucu; bir s\u00fcredir duygusal arkada\u015fl\u0131k ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E.E.nin olay tarihinde kendine cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131da bulundu\u011funu iddia etmi\u015ftir. E.E., ba\u015fvurucunun r\u0131zas\u0131yla cinsel ili\u015fkiye girdiklerini, ba\u015fvurucunun pi\u015fmanl\u0131k duyarak kendisini su\u00e7lad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunmu\u015ftur. Olay tarihinde ba\u015fvurucu ile E.E. aras\u0131nda cinsel ili\u015fki ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
26. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi ekinde genital muayenesinde saptanan g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn aktard\u0131\u011f\u0131 akut cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 \u00f6yk\u00fcs\u00fc ile uyumlu oldu\u011funa dair \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Ana Bilim Dal\u0131n\u0131n 4\/2\/2013 tarihli raporunu sunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
27. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a, ba\u015fvurucu ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin ifadeleri al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca, 4\/2\/2013 tarihli rapordaki tespitin ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131ya maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6stergesi olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131na dair ek rapor al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ek raporda, genital b\u00f6lgede b\u00fcy\u00fck dudaklar\u0131n i\u00e7 k\u0131sm\u0131nda saptanan noktasal kanama ve himenal kenardaki \u00f6demli ve \u015fi\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn akut cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 bulgusu olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilece\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k\u00e7a yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma neticesinde \u015f\u00fcpheli E.E. hakk\u0131nda nitelikli cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 ve ki\u015fiyi h\u00fcrriyetinden yoksun k\u0131lma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
28. Kovu\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131nda tan\u0131klar dinlenmi\u015f, ba\u015fvurucunun cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 eylemi sonucunda beden ve ruh sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bozulup bozulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda Adli T\u0131p Kurumundan rapor al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131ndan ba\u015fka kesin, somut ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil elde edilemedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle beraat karar\u0131 verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
29. Elbette soru\u015fturma veya kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcrecinin sonunda eksiksiz toplanan deliller analiz edilirken de\u011ferlendirmeye esas al\u0131nmamas\u0131 gerekli g\u00f6r\u00fclenler de\u011ferlendirme d\u0131\u015f\u0131 b\u0131rak\u0131larak bir sonuca ula\u015f\u0131labilir. Anayasa Mahkemesinin yarg\u0131 makamlar\u0131n\u0131n delil de\u011ferlendirmesine ve hukuki yorumlar\u0131na m\u00fcdahale etmesi kural olarak d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemez ise de delillerin analizi sonucu ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar Anayasa’da g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan temel haklar\u0131 (somut olayda k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131) i\u015flevsiz h\u00e2le getirecek mahiyette olmamal\u0131d\u0131r (baz\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fikliklerle birlikte bkz. S.B. ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2016\/59765, 17\/6\/2020, \u00a7 45).<\/p>\n
30. Somut olayda, \u0130stanbul \u00dcniversitesi T\u0131p Fak\u00fcltesi Adli T\u0131p Ana Bilim Dal\u0131ndan al\u0131nan ek raporda (bkz. \u00a7 7) ba\u015fvurucunun genital muayenesindeki g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcn akut cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 bulgusu olarak de\u011ferlendirilebilece\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu taraf\u0131ndan sunulan belgelere g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 Kas\u0131m ay\u0131ndan beri d\u00fczenli olarak bireysel psikoterapi g\u00f6rmektedir (bkz. \u00a7 8). \u00d6zel bir hastahanenin psikiyatri formuna g\u00f6re de ba\u015fvurucu, muayeneyi yapan doktora erkek arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015ftir (bkz. \u00a7 8). Ayr\u0131ca san\u0131k olaydan sonra ba\u015fvurucunun cep telefonuna pi\u015fman oldu\u011funu ifade eden bir mesaj g\u00f6ndermi\u015f (bkz. \u00a7 3\/iv), yarg\u0131lama a\u015famas\u0131nda dinlenen tan\u0131klar da ba\u015fvurucunun beyanlar\u0131yla uyumlu bir \u015fekilde ba\u015fvurucu ile olay\u0131n hemen ertesi g\u00fcn\u00fc yapt\u0131klar\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri ve izlenimlerini aktarm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (bkz. \u00a7 10). Buna ra\u011fmen Mahkeme ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen bu delilleri hi\u00e7 tart\u0131\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Oysa Mahkeme san\u0131\u011fa atfedilen su\u00e7la ilgili bir sonuca varmadan \u00f6nce s\u00f6z konusu delilleri a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 ve aksi kanaate var\u0131rsa nedenleriyle bu nedenleri destekleyen delilleri teredd\u00fct yaratmayacak \u015fekilde izah etmeliydi. Ayr\u0131ca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bu denli uzamas\u0131 i\u00e7in hakl\u0131 bir neden bulunmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetiyle ilgili soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma s\u00fcreci sekiz y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fan bir s\u00fcrede sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu bak\u0131mdan ba\u015fvuruya konu edilen yarg\u0131laman\u0131n makul bir \u00f6zen ve s\u00fcratle y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc de s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
31. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M <\/p>\n
32. Ba\u015fvurucu; ihlalinin tespiti, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve 1.000.000 TL manevi tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
33. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (Mehmet Do\u011fan [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; Alig\u00fcl Alkaya ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100).<\/p>\n
34. \u00d6te yandan hak ihlali karar\u0131ndan Anayasa Mahkemesinin davan\u0131n sonucuyla ilgili olarak bir tutum sergiledi\u011fi sonucu \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesince verilen hak ihlali karar\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonu\u00e7lar\u0131ndan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olup davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne, reddine ya da beraate veya mahk\u00fbmiyete karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmemektedir. Kural olarak, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda oldu\u011fu gibi ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 gidermek \u00fczere yeniden yap\u0131lacak yarg\u0131lama sonunda da delillerin dava ile ili\u015fkisini kurma ve bunlar\u0131 de\u011ferlendirip sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131karma yetkisi ilgili mahkemelere aittir.<\/p>\n
35. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucuya manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda net 115.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Kamuya a\u00e7\u0131k belgelerde ba\u015fvurucunun kimli\u011finin gizli tutulmas\u0131 talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n usul boyutunun ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere\u0130stanbul Anadolu 9. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine (E.2013\/192) G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 115.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE, tazminata ili\u015fkin di\u011fer taleplerin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. 487,60 TL har\u00e7 ve 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan toplam 30.487,60 TL yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
G. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
H. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 22\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 22\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/45041 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 B.E. BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/45041) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 22\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130K TALEB\u0130 KABUL \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Merve ARSLANT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucu : B.E. Vekili : Av. Habibe YILMAZ KAYAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131 su\u00e7undan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu B.E. 1986 do\u011fumludur. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, 12\/9\/2012 tarihinde duygusal birliktelik ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 E.E.nin cinsel sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131na maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 19\/2\/2013tarihinde \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) \u015fik\u00e2yette bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yet dilek\u00e7esi \u015f\u00f6yledir: i. Olay tarihinden yakla\u015f\u0131k sekiz ay \u00f6nce tan\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 E.E. ile sevgili olmu\u015f, daha \u00f6nce de iste\u011fi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda cinsel birliktelik ya\u015fam\u0131\u015f, bu cinsel ili\u015fki nedeniyle v\u00fccudunda kramplar ve titremeler olu\u015fmu\u015f, intihar etmeye dahi kalk\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. E.E.ye cinsel ili\u015fki ya\u015famak istemedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi\u011fi h\u00e2lde E.E. bunu kabul etmemi\u015f ve psikolojik destek almas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. ii. Olay tarihinde E.E. uzun s\u00fcreli \u015fehir d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha sonra almas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek kendisinde kalan hard diskini almas\u0131n\u0131 istemi\u015ftir. Bunun \u00fczerine E.E.nin evine hard diskini almak i\u00e7in gitmi\u015f, ayr\u0131lmak istedi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi \u00fczerine E.E. …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36495","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n