T.C.<\/p>\n
Yarg\u0131tay<\/p>\n
7. Hukuk Dairesi<\/p>\n
2015\/6338 E., 2016\/6464 K.<\/p>\n
“\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni”<\/p>\n
Mahkemesi :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi
\nDava T\u00fcr\u00fc : Alacak<\/p>\n
YARGITAY \u0130LAMI<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi taraf vekillerince istenilmekle, temyiz isteklerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I-Daval\u0131 temyizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;
\n6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun ge\u00e7ici 3.madde 1.f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; \u201cB\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin, 26\/9\/2004 tarihli 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2 nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca Resmi Gazete’de ilan edilecek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.\u201d 2.f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 26\/09\/2004 tarihli ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454’\u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.<\/p>\n
Miktar ve de\u011feri temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmayan ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal ve alacak davalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin nihai kararlar HUMK’nun 427\/2.maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilemez.<\/p>\n
Kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgilidir. Temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 belirlenirken yaln\u0131z dava konusu edilen ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal\u0131n veya alaca\u011f\u0131n de\u011feri dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. Faiz, icra(inkar) tazminat\u0131, vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri hesaba kat\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n
Birle\u015ftirilen davalarda, temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 her dava i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenir.<\/p>\n
\u0130htiyari dava arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 her dava arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n davas\u0131 i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenir.<\/p>\n
Kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k davada, temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 as\u0131l dava ve kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k dava i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenir.<\/p>\n
Tespit davalar\u0131nda, temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nc\u00fcs\u00fc oldu\u011fu eda davas\u0131n\u0131n miktar ve de\u011ferine g\u00f6re belirlenir.<\/p>\n
Temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131ndan fazla bir alaca\u011f\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131n dava edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, h\u00fck\u00fcmde as\u0131l istemin kabul edilmeyen b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7meyen taraf\u0131n temyiz hakk\u0131 yoktur. K\u0131saca temyize konu edilen miktara bak\u0131larak kesinlik belirlenir.<\/p>\n
Alaca\u011f\u0131n bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n dava edilmesi halinde, k\u0131smi davada kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 dava edilen miktara g\u00f6re de\u011fil, alaca\u011f\u0131n tamam\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenir.
\nYarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme B\u00fcy\u00fck Genel Kurulu’nun 06.06.1975 g\u00fcn ve 1975\/6-8 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131nda \u201c5521 say\u0131l\u0131 yasada a\u00e7\u0131k d\u00fczenleme olmamakla birlikte, bu yasan\u0131n 15.maddesindeki d\u00fczenleme gere\u011fi HUMK’nun 427.maddesindeki kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f mahkemelerinde verilen kararlarda da uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, grup halinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n salt i\u015f mahkemelerine \u00f6zg\u00fc bir dava t\u00fcr\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu nedenle seri olarak a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda her dosya i\u00e7in kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na bak\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi\u201d a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2014 y\u0131l\u0131nda mahkemelerce verilen kararlar\u0131n temyiz edilebilmesi i\u00e7in temyize konu dava de\u011ferinin 1.890,00 TL’s\u0131n\u0131 ge\u00e7mesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda temyize konu edilen miktar 1.300,00 TL olup karar tarihi itibariyle h\u00fck\u00fcm kesin nitelik ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\n
II-Davac\u0131 temyizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden;<\/p>\n
1-Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, h\u00fckm\u00fcn Dairemizce de benimsenmi\u015f bulunan yasal ve hukuksal gerek\u00e7eleriyle dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi delillere ve \u00f6zellikle bu delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bendin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine,<\/p>\n
2-Davac\u0131, i\u015fyerinde personel maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n hep ge\u00e7 \u00f6dendi\u011fini ve bir maa\u015f\u0131n bloke edildi\u011fini, 0cak\/2011 d\u00f6neminde sadece sa\u011fl\u0131k\u00e7\u0131 personelin elden \u00f6denmesi gereken maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6dendi\u011fini, bu durumu hastane y\u00f6netimine iletti\u011fini ancak olumsuz cevap ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve otomasyon hesab\u0131n\u0131n kapat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bir ba\u015fka arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n bilgisi d\u00e2hilinde \u201csa\u011fl\u0131k\u00e7\u0131 personelin maa\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n di\u011fer personele elden verilen maa\u015flardan \u00f6nce verildi\u011fi, di\u011fer personele hen\u00fcz verilmedi\u011fi, bunun e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu\u201d mesaj\u0131n\u0131 t\u00fcm hastane personeline yayd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bunun \u00fczerine hastane yetkilileri taraf\u0131ndan istifaya zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hakaret ve tehdide maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hastanenin avukat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 02.02.2011 tarihli tutana\u011f\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fini ve kendisinden savunma istendi\u011fini, savunmas\u0131n\u0131 haz\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ancak avukat\u0131n elden almamas\u0131 \u00fczerine posta ile yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 03.02.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc bir ka\u00e7 g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlisi taraf\u0131ndan fiziki ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddete maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve istifa etmesi konusunda tehdit edildi\u011fini, daha sonra kendisine zorla istifa dilek\u00e7esi yazd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu hususun ibraz etti\u011fi ses kayd\u0131nda da mevcut oldu\u011funu, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde feshedildi\u011fini \u00f6ne s\u00fcrerek k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 ile fazla mesai, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil, hafta tatili, y\u0131ll\u0131k izin \u00fccreti ve \u00fccret alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n tahsilini talep etmi\u015ftir.
\nDaval\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n bir ba\u015fka arkada\u015f\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131 \u00fczerinden maa\u015flar\u0131n \u00f6denmedi\u011fi konusunda bir mesaj yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n i\u015flerin aksamas\u0131na sebebiyet verdi\u011fini, mesaj\u0131 yay\u0131nlayan Saliha Koyun\u2019a soruldu\u011funda bu mesaj\u0131 kendisinin yay\u0131nlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fini, yap\u0131lan ara\u015ft\u0131rmada davac\u0131n\u0131n bu mesaj\u0131 yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n izinsiz, gizli bir \u015fekilde ba\u015fka bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n ad\u0131 ile mesaj yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, maa\u015flarla ilgili herhangi bir aksakl\u0131\u011f\u0131n mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n gayri ahlaki davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131dan savunma talep edildi\u011fini ancak mesaj\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin tekrar\u0131 olan savunmas\u0131n\u0131 posta ile yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, mesai arkada\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 davrand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemeleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda rahats\u0131z olan davac\u0131n\u0131n kendi iste\u011fiyle istifa etti\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Mahkemece, davac\u0131n\u0131n hastane otomasyonu \u00fczerinden ba\u015fka bir personelin \u015fifresini kullanarak i\u015fveren aleyhine mesaj yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131, akabinde savunmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fi, davac\u0131n\u0131n savunmas\u0131nda bu olguyu kabul ve ikrar etti\u011fi ve sonras\u0131nda 03.02.2011 tarihinde istifa etti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen Savc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturmas\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n hakaret ve tehdide maruz kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, istifa dilek\u00e7esinin irade fesad\u0131 halleri i\u00e7erisinde imzalatt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n kan\u0131tlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, istifa ederek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini sona erdiren davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 taleplerinin yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram genel tatil \u00fccreti ve hafta tatil \u00fccreti taleplerinin reddi ile davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda, i\u015f ili\u015fkisinin ne \u015fekilde sona erdi\u011fi konusunda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Genel olarak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini fesih hakk\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa y\u00f6neltilmesi gereken tek tarafl\u0131 bir irade beyan\u0131 ile i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini derhal veya belirli bir s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mesiyle ortadan kald\u0131rabilme yetkisi veren, bozucu yenilik do\u011furan bir hakt\u0131r. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin hakl\u0131 nedenle i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini derhal feshi 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanununun 24 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015f\u00e7inin \u00f6nelli fesih bildiriminin normatif d\u00fczenlemesi ise ayn\u0131 yasan\u0131n 17 nci maddesinde ele al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Yasada i\u015f\u00e7inin istifas\u0131 \u00f6zel olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin hakl\u0131 bir nedene dayanmadan ve bildirim \u00f6neli tan\u0131maks\u0131z\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini feshi, istifa olarak de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. \u0130stifa iradesinin kar\u015f\u0131 tarafa ula\u015fmas\u0131yla birlikte i\u015f ili\u015fkisi sona erer. \u0130stifan\u0131n i\u015fverence kabul\u00fc zorunlu de\u011filse de, i\u015fverence dilek\u00e7enin i\u015fleme konulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 ve i\u015f\u00e7inin de i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etmesi halinde ger\u00e7ek bir istifadan s\u00f6z edilemez. Bununla birlikte istifaya ra\u011fmen taraflar\u0131n belirli bir s\u00fcre daha \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma y\u00f6n\u00fcnde iradelerinin birle\u015fmesi halinde, kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan s\u00fcrenin sonunda i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ikale yoluyla sona erdi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u015earta ba\u011fl\u0131 istifa ise kural olarak ge\u00e7erli de\u011fildir. Uygulamada en \u00e7ok kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan \u015fekliyle, i\u015f\u00e7inin ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 haklar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesi \u015fart\u0131yla ayr\u0131lma talebi istifa olarak de\u011fil, ikale (bozma s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi) yapma y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir icap olarak de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin istifa dilek\u00e7esindeki iradesinin fesada u\u011frat\u0131lmas\u0131 da s\u0131k\u00e7a kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan bir durumdur. \u0130\u015fverenin tazminatlar\u0131n derhal \u00f6denece\u011fi s\u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc vermek ve benzeri bask\u0131larla i\u015f\u00e7iden yaz\u0131l\u0131 istifa dilek\u00e7esi vermesini talep etmesi ve i\u015f\u00e7inin buna uymas\u0131 halinde, ger\u00e7ek bir istifa iradesinden s\u00f6z edilemez. Bu halde feshin i\u015fverence ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015fverenin bask\u0131 uygulamas\u0131 sonucu d\u00fczenlenen istifa dilek\u00e7esine de\u011fer verilemez. Dairemizce bu gibi hallerde feshin i\u015fverence ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, bununla birlikte i\u015fveren feshinin hakl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015f\u00e7inin hakl\u0131 nedenle derhal fesih nedenleri mevcut oldu\u011fu ve buna uygun bi\u00e7imde bir fesih yoluna gidece\u011fi s\u0131rada, iradesi fesada u\u011frat\u0131larak i\u015fverence istifa dilek\u00e7esi al\u0131nmas\u0131 durumunda da istifaya ge\u00e7erlilik tan\u0131nmas\u0131 do\u011fru olmaz. Bu durumda i\u015f\u00e7inin hakl\u0131 olarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi feshetti\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
\u0130stifa belgesine dayan\u0131lmakla birlikte, i\u015f\u00e7iye ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmi\u015f olmas\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye \u0130\u015f Kurumuna yap\u0131lan bildirimde i\u015fveren feshinden s\u00f6z edilmesi gibi \u00e7eli\u015fkili durumlarda, her bir somut olay y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bu \u00e7eli\u015fkinin istifan\u0131n ge\u00e7erlili\u011fine etkisinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
\u0130stifa belgesindeki ifadenin genel bir i\u00e7erik ta\u015f\u0131mas\u0131 durumunda, i\u015f\u00e7inin dava dilek\u00e7esinde somut sebepleri belirtmesinde hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bu halde de istifan\u0131n ard\u0131ndaki ger\u00e7ek durum ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n
Somut olayda davac\u0131, zorla istifa dilek\u00e7esi yazd\u0131r\u0131larak i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin haks\u0131z bir \u015fekilde sonland\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015f, daval\u0131 ise davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdinin istifa ile sona erdi\u011fini savunmu\u015ftur. Mahkemece, i\u015f akdini istifa ederek sonland\u0131ran davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 taleplerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n bir ba\u015fka \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n otomasyon hesab\u0131ndan kimli\u011fini gizleyerek “\u0130\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin temel ilkelerinden olan e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131larak sa\u011fl\u0131k\u00e7\u0131 personellerin \u00fccretleri \u00f6denmi\u015f, di\u011fer personellerin \u00fccreti \u00f6denmemi\u015ftir. E\u015fitlik ilkesinin gere\u011fi olarak \u015fu an itibariyle t\u00fcm venividi personelleri (sa\u011fl\u0131k\u00e7\u0131 personel d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda) 4’er ayl\u0131k tazminat almaya hak kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 venividi y\u00f6netim kadrolar\u0131na hat\u0131rlat\u0131r\u0131z.” \u015feklindeki mesaj\u0131 g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131 03.02.2011 tarihinde al\u0131nan savunmas\u0131nda bu mesaj\u0131 g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Dosyada davac\u0131n\u0131n savunmas\u0131 ile ayn\u0131 tarihli istifa dilek\u00e7esi de bulunmaktad\u0131r. Davac\u0131, bir ka\u00e7 g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlisi taraf\u0131ndan fiziki ve s\u00f6zl\u00fc \u015fiddete maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, istifa etmesi konusunda tehdit edildi\u011fini, kendisine zorla istifa dilek\u00e7esi yazd\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Nitekim, davac\u0131n\u0131n bu iddialar\u0131yla ilgili 04.02.2011 tarihli \u015fikayeti \u00fczerine daval\u0131 i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan g\u00fcvenlik g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda basit yaralama ve birden fazla ki\u015fi ile tehdit su\u00e7undan dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup yarg\u0131lama halen devam etmektedir. Ceza davas\u0131 dosyas\u0131na davac\u0131n\u0131n sundu\u011fu ve \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc yapt\u0131r\u0131lan ses kayd\u0131ndaki konu\u015fmalardan davac\u0131n\u0131n istifaya zorland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu durumda, daval\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdini hakl\u0131 nedenle fesih hakk\u0131 olu\u015fmu\u015f olsa dahi, bask\u0131 ve tehdit alt\u0131nda verilen istifa dilek\u00e7esinin ge\u00e7erli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, istifa dilek\u00e7esinin ger\u00e7ek istifa iradesini ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n istifaya zorlanmas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fveren feshi niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davac\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 taleplerinin kabul\u00fc gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7e ile reddi hatal\u0131 olup, bozmay\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
SONU\u00c7: Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle daval\u0131n\u0131n temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin reddine, davac\u0131n\u0131n temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle temyiz olunan karar\u0131n, yukar\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 nedenle BOZULMASINA, pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz harc\u0131n\u0131n istek halinde taraflara iadesine, 16.03.2016 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bYarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi\u2019nin 16.03.2016 tarihli, 2015\/6338 E, 2016\/6464 K, say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. Yarg\u0131tay 7. Hukuk Dairesi 2015\/6338 E., 2016\/6464 K. “\u0130\u00e7tihat Metni” Mahkemesi :\u0130\u015f Mahkemesi Dava T\u00fcr\u00fc : Alacak YARGITAY \u0130LAMI Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen dava sonucunda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn, Yarg\u0131tay’ca incelenmesi taraf vekillerince istenilmekle, temyiz isteklerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131. Dosya incelendi, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc: I-Daval\u0131 temyizi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun ge\u00e7ici 3.madde 1.f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; \u201cB\u00f6lge adliye mahkemelerinin, 26\/9\/2004 tarihli 5235 say\u0131l\u0131 Adli Yarg\u0131 \u0130lk Derece Mahkemeleri ile B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin Kurulu\u015f, G\u00f6rev ve Yetkileri Hakk\u0131nda Kanunun ge\u00e7ici 2 nci maddesi uyar\u0131nca Resmi Gazete’de ilan edilecek g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihine kadar, 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun temyize ili\u015fkin y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur.\u201d 2.f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re; B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemelerinin g\u00f6reve ba\u015flama tarihinden \u00f6nce aleyhine temyiz yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olan kararlar hakk\u0131nda, kesinle\u015finceye kadar 1086 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 26\/09\/2004 tarihli ve 5236 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunla yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nceki 427 ila 454’\u00fcnc\u00fc madde h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na devam olunur. Miktar ve de\u011feri temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131 a\u015fmayan ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal ve alacak davalar\u0131na ili\u015fkin nihai kararlar HUMK’nun 427\/2.maddesi uyar\u0131nca temyiz edilemez. Kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgilidir. Temyiz kesinlik s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 belirlenirken yaln\u0131z dava konusu edilen ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r mal\u0131n veya alaca\u011f\u0131n de\u011feri dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. Faiz, icra(inkar) tazminat\u0131, vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri hesaba kat\u0131lmaz. Birle\u015ftirilen davalarda, temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 her dava i\u00e7in ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenir. \u0130htiyari dava arkada\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, temyiz s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n