T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ERKAN TEPEL\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/28682)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 8\/1\/2025<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Erkan TEPEL\u0130<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. \u00dcmit S\u0130SL\u0130G\u00dcN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Av. Meral HANBAYAT YE\u015e\u0130L<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, konutu terk etmemeye ili\u015fkin adli kontrol tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu etkinli\u011fin yasaklanmas\u0131 nedeniyle de ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 2\/2\/2021 tarihli kararla COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle toplum sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, salg\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi amac\u0131yla ve toplumsal i\u00e7 bar\u0131\u015f\u0131 tehdit edebilecek etkinliklerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ihtimali g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak 2\/2\/2021 tarihinden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle Kad\u0131k\u00f6y il\u00e7esindeki t\u00fcm a\u00e7\u0131k alanlarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi planlanan toplant\u0131, miting, y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131, konser gibi etkinlikler yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. S\u00f6z konusu yasaklama karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Kad\u0131k\u00f6y il\u00e7esinde 4\/2\/2021 tarihinde toplanan ve ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen gruba g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerince m\u00fcdahale edilmi\u015ftir. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re olay\u0131n geli\u015fimi \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. \u00c7e\u015fitli marjinal gruplar sosyal medyadan “Fa\u015fizme kar\u015f\u0131 birle\u015f[me], \u00f6rg\u00fctlen[me], m\u00fccadeleyi y\u00fcksel[tme]” amac\u0131yla toplant\u0131 \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131s\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince Halk\u0131n Demokrasi Partisi il\u00e7e binas\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcnde toplanan elli ki\u015filik gruba Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle yap\u0131lacak her t\u00fcrl\u00fc etkinli\u011fi yasaklama karar\u0131 bulundu\u011fu bildirilmi\u015ftir. Ayr\u0131ca toplulu\u011fa da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131, aksi h\u00e2lde m\u00fcdahale edilece\u011fi de ses y\u00fckseltici cihazla defalarca ihtar edilmi\u015f ve da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 i\u00e7in yeterli s\u00fcre tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130htara ra\u011fmen y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe devam etmek istemeleri nedeniyle grup kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince fiziki ve seyyar bariyerlerle engellenmi\u015f ve gruba yakalama i\u015flemi yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131’nda “…grup \u00fcyelerinin taraf\u0131m\u0131zdan yap\u0131lan uyar\u0131lar\u0131 dikkate almay\u0131p y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapmak istemeleri \u00fczerine \u00f6nleri seyyar bariyerlerle kapat\u0131lmak ve personel vas\u0131tas\u0131yla hat \u00e7ekilmek suretiyle y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri engellenerek yakalanmalar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik m\u00fcdahale edil[di\u011fi]” \u015feklinde ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. M\u00fcdahale sonucu da\u011f\u0131lan grubun bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn tekrar toplanarak \u0130skele Meydan\u0131’na y\u00fcr\u00fcmek istemesi \u00fczerine bariyer \u00e7ekilerek grup engellenmi\u015f, da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde gruba ihtarlarda bulunulmu\u015f ve akabinde yakalama i\u015flemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. Grup i\u00e7inde bir ki\u015fi, cadde ortas\u0131na oturarak belediye otob\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fcn ge\u00e7i\u015fine engel olmu\u015f, akabinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakereyle trafik ak\u0131\u015f\u0131 tekrar sa\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Grubun bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n \u0130skele Meydan\u0131’na gitmek i\u00e7in toplanmas\u0131 \u00fczerine kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince grup engellenmi\u015f; gruba da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ihtarlarda bulunulmu\u015f ve akabinde yakalama i\u015flemi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmi\u015ftir. Bu kapsamda 4\/2\/2021 tarihinde, aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da oldu\u011fu altm\u0131\u015f be\u015f ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda yakalama, bunlar\u0131n altm\u0131\u015f biri hakk\u0131nda da g\u00f6zalt\u0131na alma i\u015flemi uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu 8\/2\/2021 tarihinde \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) haz\u0131r edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu; Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131kta al\u0131nan ifadesinde \u00f6zetle kolluk g\u00f6revlilerinin “Da\u011f\u0131l” ihtarat\u0131ndan sonra oradan ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, herhangi bir eylemde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, anayasal hakk\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmedi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir\u00e7ok \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 6\/10\/1983 tarihli ve 2911 say\u0131l\u0131 Toplant\u0131 ve G\u00f6steri Y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri Kanunu\u2019nun 32. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015flere silahs\u0131z kat\u0131larak ihtara ra\u011fmen kendili\u011finden da\u011f\u0131lmama su\u00e7undan tutuklama karar\u0131 verilmesi talep edilmi\u015ftir. Tutuklama talebinde, Kaymakaml\u0131k\u00e7a t\u00fcm kapal\u0131 ve a\u00e7\u0131k alanlarda toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yasaklanmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphelilerin olay g\u00fcn\u00fc Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Meydan\u0131’nda karara ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak topland\u0131klar\u0131, emniyet ekiplerinin ihtarlar\u0131na ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131, t\u00fcm bu hususlar\u0131n dosyada mevcut tutanaklar, g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ve \u015f\u00fcpheli savunmalar\u0131ndan anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcphelilerin \u00fczerilerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015flediklerine dair kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6steren olgular\u0131n ve tutuklama nedeninin bulundu\u011fu, m\u00fcsnet su\u00e7un katalog su\u00e7lardan oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi (H\u00e2kimlik) 8\/2\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun, yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kamama, haftan\u0131n bir g\u00fcn\u00fc konutuna en yak\u0131n kolluk birimine ba\u015fvurarak imza atma ve konutu terk etmeme \u015feklinde adli kontrol tedbirlerine tabi tutulmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda, ba\u015fvurucunun \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe olu\u015fmu\u015f ise de su\u00e7 vasf\u0131n\u0131n ve delil durumunun lehe de\u011fi\u015fme ihtimaline binaentutuklama talebinin reddine, ancak deliller tam toplanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan an\u0131lan adli kontrol tedbirlerinin uygulanmas\u0131na karar verildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun bu karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131, \u0130stanbul Anadolu 10. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fince 17\/2\/2021 tarihinde reddedilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, ret karar\u0131n\u0131 15\/3\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f ve 14\/4\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. \u0130stanbul Anadolu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 4\/3\/2021 tarihli iddianamesiyle ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu elli bir ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131lara ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015flere silahs\u0131z kat\u0131larak ihtara ra\u011fmen kendili\u011finden da\u011f\u0131lmama su\u00e7unu i\u015fledikleri iddias\u0131yla kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ddianamede; Kad\u0131k\u00f6y’de muhtemel toplumsal olaylar ger\u00e7ekle\u015fece\u011finin, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fleri yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, baz\u0131 gruplar organizesinde sosyal medya \u00fczerinden Kad\u0131k\u00f6y’de 4\/2\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fta ger\u00e7ek ki\u015fi ve sivil toplum \u00f6rg\u00fctleri olmak \u00fczere \u00e7e\u015fitli marjinal gruplar taraf\u0131ndan toplant\u0131 amac\u0131yla bireysel ve kitlesel \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi, Kad\u0131k\u00f6y il\u00e7esindeki t\u00fcm a\u00e7\u0131k alanlarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi planlanan toplant\u0131, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131, konser gibi etkinliklerin Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 2\/2\/2021 tarihinden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6z konusu yasaklama karar\u0131n\u0131n sosyal medya \u00fczerinden \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar yapan ilgili ki\u015fi ve kurulu\u015flara telefon, resm\u00ee tebligat, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131yla ilan ve tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, yasaklama karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen 4\/2\/2021 tarihinde daha \u00f6nceki \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar do\u011frultusunda planlanan bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lar\u0131n devam etmesi \u00fczerine g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerince gerekli g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerinin al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 i\u00e7in toplanan 50 ki\u015filik grubun yasaklama karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015fe ge\u00e7mesinin ard\u0131ndan yasaklama karar\u0131 gruba tebli\u011f edilerek da\u011f\u0131lmalar\u0131 ve da\u011f\u0131lmamalar\u0131 h\u00e2linde g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerince m\u00fcdahale edilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir\u00e7ok kez uyar\u0131da bulunuldu\u011fu, uyar\u0131ya ra\u011fmen grubun y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f yapmak istemesi \u00fczerine gruba m\u00fcdahale edilerek da\u011f\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu s\u00fcrecin bir\u00e7ok kez tekrarland\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. \u0130stanbul Anadolu 35. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi 29\/3\/2021 tarihinde d\u00fczenlenen tensip zapt\u0131 ile adli kontrol tedbirinin niteli\u011fi, tedbirin konuldu\u011fu tarih ve kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki konutu terk etmeme adli kontrol tedbirinin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Davan\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ilk derece mahkemesinde derdest oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyonca ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten ge\u00e7ici olarak muaf tutulmas\u0131na ve iddialar\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Konutu Terk Etmemeye \u0130li\u015fkin Adli Kontrol Tedbirinin Hukuki Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu; isnada konu protestonun anayasal olarak korunan \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fckler kapsam\u0131nda olan bir eylem oldu\u011funu, kendisine isnat edilen su\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi ve ka\u00e7ma \u015f\u00fcphesinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, adli kontrol tedbirinin isnat edilen su\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan gerekli ve orant\u0131l\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn, anayasal hakk\u0131n\u0131 kullanmas\u0131na g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri taraf\u0131ndan haks\u0131z m\u00fcdahalede bulunulmas\u0131, anayasal hakk\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in adli kontrole tabi tutulmas\u0131 nedenleriyle de toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundakine benzer iddialarda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddias\u0131 ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmay\u0131p kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi konutu terk etmeme tedbirinin niteli\u011fi, uygulan\u0131\u015f \u015fekli ve \u00f6zellikleri itibar\u0131yla hareket serbest\u00eesi \u00fczerindeki s\u0131n\u0131rlay\u0131c\u0131 etkisinin derece ve yo\u011funluk olarak seyahat \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne g\u00f6re olduk\u00e7a ileri bir boyutta oldu\u011fu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131na m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil etti\u011fi sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a [GK], B. No: 2017\/32052, 8\/10\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 68-76).<\/p>\n
16. Konutun terk edilmemesine y\u00f6nelik bir y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u00e7eren adli kontrol tedbirinin hukukili\u011finin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde -t\u0131pk\u0131 tutuklaman\u0131n hukukili\u011finin incelenmesinde oldu\u011fu gibi- tedbirin kanun taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcp \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi, isnat edilen su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fine dair kuvvetli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n ilgili maddelerinde belirtilen hakl\u0131 sebeplerden bir veya daha fazlas\u0131na dayan\u0131l\u0131p dayan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tedbirin ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131n\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc b\u00f6yle bir adli kontrol tedbiri tutuklamaya se\u00e7enek bir koruma tedbiridir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla s\u00f6z konusu tedbire ancak -su\u00e7laman\u0131n kuvvetli say\u0131labilecek inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delillerle desteklenmesi \u015fart\u0131yla- su\u00e7lulu\u011fu hususunda kuvvetli belirti bulunan ki\u015filer hakk\u0131nda, tedbir uygulanacak ki\u015finin ka\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131 ya da delilleri yok etmesini veya de\u011fi\u015ftirmesini \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla ve ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen ama\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fczl\u00fck yoksa ba\u015fvurulabilir. Adli kontrol kapsam\u0131ndaki ba\u015fka y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin ula\u015f\u0131lmak istenen me\u015fru ama\u00e7 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yeterli olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ki\u015fi konutu terk etmeme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne tabi tutulmamal\u0131d\u0131r (benzer y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in bkz. Esra \u00d6zkan \u00d6zak\u00e7a, \u00a7\u00a7 78-83).<\/p>\n
17. Ba\u015fvurucunun bireysel ba\u015fvuruya konu etti\u011fi husus, kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 toplant\u0131 ve y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015flere silahs\u0131z kat\u0131larak ihtara ra\u011fmen kendili\u011finden da\u011f\u0131lmama su\u00e7undan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda H\u00e2kimlik taraf\u0131ndan 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 109. maddesi uyar\u0131nca verilen konutu terk etmeme adli kontrol tedbiridir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda verilen ve adli kontrol y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc olarak uygulanan konutu terk etmeme tedbirinin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
18. Kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan s\u00f6z konusu adli kontrol tedbiri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun isnat edilen su\u00e7u i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli bir \u015f\u00fcphe bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
19. \u0130snada g\u00f6re aralar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun da bulundu\u011fu grup, g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerinin yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ihtarlara ve toplant\u0131n\u0131n da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in g\u00fc\u00e7 kullan\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar etmi\u015ftir. Soru\u015fturma makamlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu, slogan atarak eylem yapan ve da\u011f\u0131lmamakta \u0131srar eden grupta yer almaktad\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucunun eyleminin isnat edilen su\u00e7u olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise hakk\u0131ndaki yarg\u0131lama derdesttir. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi adli kontrole h\u00fckmetti\u011fi kararda, tutuklama tedbirinin hukukili\u011finin \u00f6n \u015fart\u0131 olan ba\u015fvurucunun su\u00e7 i\u015fledi\u011fine dair kuvvetli belirtinin bulundu\u011funu belirtmi\u015f ise de somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda adli kontrol\u00fcn hukukili\u011finin belirlenmesinde as\u0131l incelemenin tutuklama nedenleri ve \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fck ba\u011flam\u0131nda yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n daha uygun olaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (benzer y\u00f6nde bkz. Cevdet Konak, B. No: 2021\/16161, 14\/2\/2024, \u00a7 18).<\/p>\n
20. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin adli kontrol tedbirine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131 tutuklama sebepleri olan \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ka\u00e7mas\u0131, saklanmas\u0131 ya da ka\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphesini uyand\u0131ran somut olgular\u0131n bulunmas\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n delilleri yok etme, gizleme veya de\u011fi\u015ftirmesi, tan\u0131k, ma\u011fdur veya ba\u015fkalar\u0131 \u00fczerinde bask\u0131 giri\u015fiminde bulunmas\u0131 hususlar\u0131na dair bir gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7ermemektedir. Kararda sadece delillerin tam olarak toplanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilmi\u015ftir. Ancak bu husus bir tutuklama nedeni de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n
21. T\u00fcm bu veriler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan verilen konutu terk etmemeye ili\u015fkin adli kontrol tedbiri karar\u0131nda, s\u00f6z konusu tedbirin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 zorunlu k\u0131lan nedenlerin yani tedbirin me\u015fru amac\u0131n\u0131n ne oldu\u011funun ifade edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin adli kontrol tedbirinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n gereklili\u011fini ortaya koymak bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Var\u0131lan bu sonu\u00e7 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda tedbirin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayr\u0131ca inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131na gerek bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
22. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
23. Somut olayda adli kontrol tedbiri nedeniyle olu\u015fan m\u00fcdahalenin ba\u015fvurucunun ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131 ihlal etti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
B. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
24. Ba\u015fvurucu; iktidar partisi ve Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen etkinliklere, ba\u015fka derneklerce tertip edilen toplant\u0131lara izin verilirken, kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu etkinli\u011fin yasaklanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
25. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edilip edilmedi\u011finin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in kural olarak ki\u015finin hangi temel hak ve \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc konusunda, ayr\u0131ca hangi temele dayal\u0131 olarak ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti gerekir. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k iddias\u0131n\u0131n ciddiye al\u0131nabilmesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurucunun, kendisiyle benzer durumdaki ba\u015fka ki\u015filere yap\u0131lan muamele ile kendisine yap\u0131lan muamele aras\u0131nda bir farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n bulundu\u011funu ifade etmesi yeterli olmay\u0131p ayr\u0131ca bu farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n me\u015fru bir temeli olmaks\u0131z\u0131n \u0131rk, renk, cinsiyet, din, dil vb. bir ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k temeline dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 makul delillerle ortaya koymas\u0131 gerekir (Adnan Oktar (2), B. No: 2013\/514, 2\/10\/2013, \u00a7 46).<\/p>\n
26. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131 temellendirecek somut bir bilgi ve kan\u0131t sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, iddialar\u0131n\u0131 soyut olarak ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
28. Ba\u015fvurucu, ihlalin tespitini ve 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
29. Tespit edilen ihlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin usul ve esaslar 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 50. maddesinde yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
30. Anayasa Mahkemesince yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Bu itibarla ihlalin mahkeme karar\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki konutu terk etmeme \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbiri sona ermi\u015ftir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ihlalin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Di\u011fer taraftan yaln\u0131zca ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finin tespitiyle giderilemeyecek olan manevi zararlar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucuya talebiyle ba\u011fl\u0131 kal\u0131narak net50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Konutu terk etmeme \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Konutu terk etmeme \u015feklindeki adli kontrol tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 19. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Ba\u015fvurucuya net 50.000 TL manevi tazminat \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. 30.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinden olu\u015fan yarg\u0131lama giderinin ba\u015fvurucuya \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. \u00d6demenin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucunun Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
F. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin bilgi i\u00e7in \u0130stanbul Anadolu 3. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fine (2021\/159 Sorgu) ve Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 8\/1\/2025 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 8\/1\/2025 tarihli ve 2021\/28682 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ERKAN TEPEL\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/28682) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 8\/1\/2025 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Erkan TEPEL\u0130 Vekilleri : Av. \u00dcmit S\u0130SL\u0130G\u00dcN \u00a0 \u00a0 Av. Meral HANBAYAT YE\u015e\u0130L \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, konutu terk etmemeye ili\u015fkin adli kontrol tedbirinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n, kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu etkinli\u011fin yasaklanmas\u0131 nedeniyle de ayr\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Kad\u0131k\u00f6y Kaymakaml\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 2\/2\/2021 tarihli kararla COVID-19 salg\u0131n\u0131 nedeniyle toplum sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131, kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131, salg\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n engellenmesi amac\u0131yla ve toplumsal i\u00e7 bar\u0131\u015f\u0131 tehdit edebilecek etkinliklerin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fme ihtimali g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak 2\/2\/2021 tarihinden itibaren yedi g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle Kad\u0131k\u00f6y il\u00e7esindeki t\u00fcm a\u00e7\u0131k alanlarda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmesi planlanan toplant\u0131, miting, y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f, bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131, konser gibi etkinlikler yasaklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. S\u00f6z konusu yasaklama karar\u0131na ra\u011fmen Kad\u0131k\u00f6y il\u00e7esinde 4\/2\/2021 tarihinde toplanan ve ba\u015fvurucunun da aralar\u0131nda oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen gruba g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7lerince m\u00fcdahale edilmi\u015ftir. Kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince d\u00fczenlenen Olay Tutana\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6re olay\u0131n geli\u015fimi \u015f\u00f6yledir: i. \u00c7e\u015fitli marjinal gruplar sosyal medyadan “Fa\u015fizme kar\u015f\u0131 birle\u015f[me], \u00f6rg\u00fctlen[me], m\u00fccadeleyi y\u00fcksel[tme]” amac\u0131yla toplant\u0131 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n