T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
S. E. VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/1270)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi:17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Cafiye Ece YALIM<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Vekilleri<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Bkz. ekli tablonun (F) s\u00fctunu<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurular, silah\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bedelini \u00f6deyerek sat\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131 ate\u015fli silahlar\u0131n\u0131n ruhsatlar\u0131 iptal edilerek 25\/7\/2018 tarihli ve 7145 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 12. maddesiyle 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu\u2019na eklenen ek 4. madde uyar\u0131nca silahlar\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular an\u0131lan i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 idarelere ba\u015fvurarak silahlar\u0131n iadesi veya bedelinin \u00f6denmesi ya da silah ruhsat\u0131 alabilecek bir yak\u0131nlar\u0131na devredebilme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130darelerin ba\u015fvurular\u0131 reddetmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular \u0130dare Mahkemelerinde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ekli listenin (D) s\u00fctununda yer alan \u0130dare Mahkemeleri muhtelif tarihlerde davalar\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130dare Mahkemeleri kararlar\u0131nda 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ek 4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca silahlar\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini, i\u015flemin hukuka uygun oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015flerdir.<\/p>\n
3. Konya 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kesin olarak verilen karar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u0130dare Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulmas\u0131 nedeniyle inceleme yapan B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemeleri kararlar\u0131n usul ve yasaya uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n esastan reddine kesin olarak karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular, nihai kararlar\u0131 \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur. Komisyon ekli listenin (B) s\u00fctununda g\u00f6sterilen ba\u015fvurular\u0131n konu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuki irtibat\u0131 bulunmas\u0131 nedeniyle 2023\/1270 numaral\u0131 bireysel ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131 ile birle\u015ftirilmesine ve incelemenin bu dosya \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular; bedelini \u00f6deyerek sat\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131 silahlar\u0131n\u0131n kendilerine bedeli \u00f6denmeksizin veya \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere devretme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesinden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. \u00d6te yandan 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un ek 4. maddesinin ba\u015fvuru konusu silah\u0131 teslim ettikten sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girdi\u011fi de vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucular adil yarg\u0131lanma, etkili ba\u015fvuru ve m\u00fclkiyet haklar\u0131 ile masumiyet karinesinin, e\u015fitlik ve kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvuru m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. A\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve kabul edilemezli\u011fine karar verilmesini gerektirecek ba\u015fka bir neden de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n kabul edilebilir oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n
8. Anayasa Mahkemesi, olay ve olgular\u0131 somut ba\u015fvuru ile benzer nitelikte olan Mehmet Ra\u015fit Ergun (B. No: 2019\/29881, 13\/4\/2023) karar\u0131nda uygulanacak anayasal ilkeleri belirlemi\u015ftir. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede silah\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesi karar\u0131, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un ek 4. maddesine dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin kanuni dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu, mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenlik ve kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 hedeflemesi nedeniyle de kamu yarar\u0131na dayal\u0131 me\u015fru bir amac\u0131n\u0131n mevcut oldu\u011fu de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda silah\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesi \u015feklinde uygulanan tedbirin mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenlik ve kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in elveri\u015fli bir ara\u00e7 oldu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. \u00d6te yandan s\u00f6z konusu kararda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere devir imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ya da herhangi bir tazminat yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmeksizin do\u011frudan silah\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesi bi\u00e7iminde ba\u015fvurucuya a\u011f\u0131r k\u00fclfet y\u00fckleyen bir arac\u0131n mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenlik ve kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131na ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in en hafif m\u00fcdahale te\u015fkil eden ara\u00e7 oldu\u011funun s\u00f6ylenemeyece\u011fi bu durumda ba\u015fvurucunun m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin gereklilik kriterini kar\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilerek m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Somut ba\u015fvurularda, an\u0131lan kararda a\u00e7\u0131klanan ilkelerden ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Sonu\u00e7 olarak bedelini \u00f6deyerek sat\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131, ruhsat\u0131 iptal edilen silahlar\u0131n -\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere devir imk\u00e2n\u0131 veya herhangi bir giderim yolu tan\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n-m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya devredilmesinin ba\u015fvuruculara a\u011f\u0131r bir k\u00fclfet y\u00fckledi\u011fi, mill\u00ee g\u00fcvenlik ve kamu d\u00fczeninin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ve korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in elveri\u015fli olan m\u00fcdahalenin,daha hafif bir m\u00fcdahale ile ayn\u0131 amacaula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmas\u0131 nedeniyle gereklilik unsurunu sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcl\u00fc olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle Anayasa’n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. G\u0130DER\u0130M<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucular, yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuruda tespit edilen hak ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda hukuki yarar bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu kapsamda karar\u0131n g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi yarg\u0131 mercilerince yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken i\u015f, yeniden yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemlerini ba\u015flatmak ve Anayasa Mahkemesini ihlal sonucuna ula\u015ft\u0131ran nedenleri gideren, ihlal karar\u0131nda belirtilen ilkelere uygun yeni bir karar vermektir (M. D. [GK], B. No: 2014\/8875, 7\/6\/2018, \u00a7\u00a7 54-60; A. A. ve di\u011ferleri (2), B. No: 2016\/12506, 7\/11\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 53-60, 66; Kadri Enis Berbero\u011flu (3) [GK], B. No: 2020\/32949, 21\/1\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 93-100). \u0130hlalin ve sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir giderim sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan tazminat taleplerinin reddine karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
IV. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. M\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n KABUL ED\u0130LEB\u0130L\u0130R OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 35. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n \u0130HLAL ED\u0130LD\u0130\u011e\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
C. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in yeniden yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere ekli tablonun (D) s\u00fctununda belirtilen ilgili mahkemelere G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
D. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tazminat taleplerinin REDD\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
E. Ekli tablonun (E) s\u00fctununda belirtilen har\u00e7 miktarlar\u0131n\u0131n ve (G) s\u00fctununda belirtilen vek\u00e2let \u00fccretlerinin tabloda g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi \u015fekilde ba\u015fvuruculara \u00d6DENMES\u0130NE,<\/p>\n
F. \u00d6demelerin karar\u0131n tebli\u011fini takiben ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n Hazine ve Maliye Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ba\u015fvuru tarihinden itibaren d\u00f6rt ay i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131na, \u00f6demede gecikme olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcrenin sona erdi\u011fi tarihten \u00f6deme tarihine kadar ge\u00e7en s\u00fcre i\u00e7in yasal FA\u0130Z UYGULANMASINA,<\/p>\n
G. Karar\u0131n bir \u00f6rne\u011finin Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na G\u00d6NDER\u0130LMES\u0130NE 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2023\/1270 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 S. E. VE D\u0130\u011eERLER\u0130 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2023\/1270) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi:17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : Cafiye Ece YALIM Ba\u015fvurucular : Vekilleri : Bkz. ekli tablonun (F) s\u00fctunu \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvurular, silah\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesi nedeniyle m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n bedelini \u00f6deyerek sat\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131 ate\u015fli silahlar\u0131n\u0131n ruhsatlar\u0131 iptal edilerek 25\/7\/2018 tarihli ve 7145 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 12. maddesiyle 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu\u2019na eklenen ek 4. madde uyar\u0131nca silahlar\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irilmesine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucular an\u0131lan i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 idarelere ba\u015fvurarak silahlar\u0131n iadesi veya bedelinin \u00f6denmesi ya da silah ruhsat\u0131 alabilecek bir yak\u0131nlar\u0131na devredebilme imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmas\u0131 talebinde bulunmu\u015ftur. \u0130darelerin ba\u015fvurular\u0131 reddetmesi \u00fczerine ba\u015fvurucular \u0130dare Mahkemelerinde dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ekli listenin (D) s\u00fctununda yer alan \u0130dare Mahkemeleri muhtelif tarihlerde davalar\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. \u0130dare Mahkemeleri kararlar\u0131nda 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un ek 4. maddesi uyar\u0131nca silahlar\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetinin kamuya ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini, i\u015flemin hukuka uygun oldu\u011funu belirtmi\u015flerdir. 3. Konya 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan kesin olarak verilen karar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda \u0130dare Mahkemesi kararlar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf kanun yoluna …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n