T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
EMRE KEND\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/17941)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Recai AKYEL<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Selahaddin MENTE\u015e<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Yusuf Enes KAYA<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Emre KEND\u0130R<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme i\u00e7in ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilmesi gereken s\u00fcrenin \u00fc\u00e7te iki yerine d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak belirlenmesi nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin; ko\u015fullu sal\u0131vermeye ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemede su\u00e7a g\u00f6re ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda D\u00fczce Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 5\/3\/2018 tarihiyle 12\/3\/2018 tarihi aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. D\u00fczce 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 11\/11\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi reddedildikten sonra Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesince 13\/10\/2021 tarihinde mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. D\u00fczce T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda bulunan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 14\/12\/2021 tarihinde m\u00fcddetname d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu 17\/12\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle m\u00fcddetnameye itiraz ederek ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihlerinin hatal\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, 14\/4\/2020 tarihli ve 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile yap\u0131lan infaz rejimi de\u011fi\u015fikliklerinden lehine olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, bu nedenle cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te ikisini \u00e7ekmesi h\u00e2linde ko\u015fullu sal\u0131vermeden yararlanaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
7. D\u00fczce \u0130nfaz H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 20\/12\/2021 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun talebinin reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kararda ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye y\u00f6nelik lehe d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131nda ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme i\u00e7in infaz s\u00fcresinin d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu, H\u00e2kimli\u011fin karar\u0131na itiraz etmi\u015ftir. 21\/1\/2022 tarihinde itiraz\u0131 de\u011ferlendiren D\u00fczce 1. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi; H\u00e2kimlik karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 ve yeterli oldu\u011funu, itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc i\u00e7in bir neden bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu 1\/2\/2022 tarihinde Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
10. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurucunun adli yard\u0131m talebinin kabul\u00fcne, yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten ge\u00e7ici olarak muaf tutulmas\u0131na ve iddialar\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
A. Su\u00e7ta ve Cezada Kanunilik \u0130lkesinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
11. Ba\u015fvurucu 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklik sonras\u0131 cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7te ikisini \u00e7ekmesi h\u00e2linde ko\u015fullu sal\u0131vermeden yararlanabilece\u011fini, buna ra\u011fmen m\u00fcddetanamede ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verme oran\u0131n\u0131n d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen m\u00fcddetnamenin lehe olan kanun uygulanarak yeniden d\u00fczenlenmesi talebinin reddedildi\u011fini belirterek su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi, adil yarg\u0131lanma ve etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
12. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde; ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc \u015fartlar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru formundakine benzer iddialarda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
13. Ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131 su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesi kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. Anayasa Mahkemesi ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme i\u00e7in ceza infaz kurumunda kal\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken s\u00fcrenin, cezan\u0131n ne kadar \u00e7ekilece\u011fini belirledi\u011finden h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan cezan\u0131n kapsam\u0131na ili\u015fkin oldu\u011funu dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu hususta su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesini d\u00fczenleyen Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 38. maddesi \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde de\u011ferlendirilme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir (Burhan Yaz (3) [GK], B. No: 2021\/7919, 29\/5\/2024, \u00a7 64).<\/p>\n
15. Anayasa Mahkemesi ayr\u0131ca Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesinin gere\u011fi olarak lehe kanunun ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00fcr\u00fcmesi ilkesinin ko\u015fullu sal\u0131vermeye de uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi zaman y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan kanuna g\u00f6re ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye hak kazanan kimsenin bu hakk\u0131n\u0131n geri al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131, su\u00e7 i\u015flendikten sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren kanuna g\u00f6re ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme hakk\u0131n\u0131 kaybeden kimseye aleyhe olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131, su\u00e7 tarihinden sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren lehe d\u00fczenlemelerin h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc hakk\u0131nda derh\u00e2l uygulanaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmenin her iki \u015fart\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 lehe kanunun ge\u00e7mi\u015fe y\u00fcr\u00fcmesi ilkesi ge\u00e7erlidir. Bu kapsamda ceza infaz kurumunda kal\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken s\u00fcreyi azaltan bir d\u00fczenleme h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcn\u00fcn lehine olacakt\u0131r (Burhan Yaz (3), \u00a7 66).<\/p>\n
16. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucu, 12\/4\/1991 tarihli ve 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele Kanunu kapsam\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilmi\u015ftir. 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilenlerin cezalar\u0131n\u0131n ne kadar\u0131n\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda \u00e7ektikten sonra ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme imk\u00e2n\u0131ndan yararlanacaklar\u0131 hususu 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’la yap\u0131lan de\u011fi\u015fiklikten \u00f6nce, 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da do\u011frudan d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015f, bu konuda 13\/12\/2004 tarihli ve5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza ve G\u00fcvenlik Tedbirlerinin \u0130nfaz\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun’un 107. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na at\u0131f yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107. maddesinde ise bu oran d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak belirlenmi\u015ftir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlere g\u00f6re 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lardan s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm olanlara uygulanacak olan oran\u0131n d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 oldu\u011fu konusunda bir ihtilaf bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte 2020 y\u0131l\u0131nda 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’la ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilmeye ili\u015fkin bu kurallarda birtak\u0131m de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Burhan Yaz (3), \u00a7 67).<\/p>\n
17. Bu kapsamda 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 48. maddesiyle 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan “d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcn\u00fc” ibaresi “\u00fc\u00e7te ikisini” \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015f ve bu f\u0131kraya “Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7te ikiden fazla olan su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise tabi olduklar\u0131 ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 uygulan\u0131r.” c\u00fcmlesi; 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 65. maddesiyle de 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 17. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n sonuna “Ancak, s\u00fcreli hapis cezalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131, d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak uygulan\u0131r.” c\u00fcmlesi eklenmi\u015ftir (Burhan Yaz (3), \u00a7 68).<\/p>\n
18. Bu de\u011fi\u015fiklikler sonucunda 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 107. maddesinin d\u00f6rd\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki oran \u00fc\u00e7te iki olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015fse de 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a eklenen “Ancak, s\u00fcreli hapis cezalar\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131, d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak uygulan\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki c\u00fcmle ve 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a eklenen”Ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 \u00fc\u00e7te ikiden fazla olan su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ise tabi olduklar\u0131 ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 uygulan\u0131r.” \u015feklindeki c\u00fcmle nedeniyle 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda s\u00fcreli hapis cezas\u0131na mahk\u00fbm edilen ki\u015filere uygulanacak ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131nda bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik meydana gelmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu ki\u015filer y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’dan \u00f6nce de sonra da ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme oran\u0131 d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7t\u00fcr. Di\u011fer bir deyi\u015fle bu ki\u015fileri de kapsayan lehe bir kanun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Burhan Yaz (3), \u00a7 69).<\/p>\n
19. A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle somut olayda su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. E\u015fitlik \u0130lkesinin \u0130hlal Edildi\u011fine \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019da su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re ayr\u0131m yap\u0131larak d\u00fczenleme ihdas edildi\u011fini, genel olmas\u0131 gereken kanun maddelerinin lehe olan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinden bir grubun faydalanmamas\u0131 i\u00e7in istisna tan\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu kanun ile baz\u0131 su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ki\u015filer hi\u00e7 cezaevine girmeden serbest kalma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip olurken kendisinin cezas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nemli bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irmek zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
21. 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun uyar\u0131nca ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme uygulanarak cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in farkl\u0131 oran ile s\u00fcrenin belirlendi\u011fi d\u00fczenlemelerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutulan bir di\u011fer su\u00e7 grubunun -ba\u015fvurucunun i\u015fledi\u011fi su\u00e7un da d\u00e2hil oldu\u011fu- 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. S\u00f6z konusu su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan herhangi bir ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n 3713 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131ndaki su\u00e7lar\u0131n tamam\u0131 kapsam d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
22. Anayasa Mahkemesi 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un norm denetimi incelemesinde su\u00e7 ve ceza y\u00f6n\u00fcnden s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 belirtilen takdir alan\u0131n\u0131n, ceza sisteminin tamamlay\u0131c\u0131 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc olu\u015fturan infaz hukuku i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011funu, kanun koyucunun ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme, denetimli serbestlik tedbiri uygulanarak cezan\u0131n infaz\u0131 ile a\u00e7\u0131k ceza infaz kurumuna ge\u00e7menin ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 anayasal h\u00fck\u00fcmlere, toplumsal ko\u015ful ve gereklere g\u00f6re serbest\u00e7e belirleyebilece\u011fini, infaz oran\u0131 y\u00fcksek tutulan su\u00e7lar\u0131n topluma y\u00f6nelik olmalar\u0131, tehlikelilikleri, a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131klar\u0131, hukuki konular\u0131, unsur ve nitelikleri, kapsam ve boyutlar\u0131, etkileri, hukuki konular\u0131n\u0131n toplumsal ya\u015fam bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131klar\u0131 \u00f6nem g\u00f6zetilerek benzer nitelikteki su\u00e7larla birlikte tamam\u0131n\u0131n veya en a\u011f\u0131r cezay\u0131 gerektirenin infaz\u0131 kolayla\u015ft\u0131ran birtak\u0131m d\u00fczenlemelerin kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle bu su\u00e7lar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ayr\u0131m\u0131n nesnel ve makul bir temele dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi sonu\u00e7 olarak bu d\u00fczenlemelerin Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 10. maddesinde g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan e\u015fitlik ilkesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir (AYM, E.2020\/53, K.2021\/55, 14\/07\/2021 \u00a7\u00a7 169-192). Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi de su\u00e7 t\u00fcr\u00fcne g\u00f6re infaz kurallar\u0131nda farkl\u0131la\u015fmaya gidilmesinin Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi\u2019ne ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015ftir (Gerger\/T\u00fcrkiye, B. No. 24919\/94, 8\/7\/1999, \u00a7 69).<\/p>\n
23. Somut ba\u015fvuruda da s\u00f6z konusu kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirecek bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
24. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. E\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan adli yard\u0131m talebi kabul edilen ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 18\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 18\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2022\/17941 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 EMRE KEND\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2022\/17941) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 18\/12\/2024 B\u0130R\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Hasan Tahsin G\u00d6KCAN \u00dcyeler : Recai AKYEL \u00a0 \u00a0 Yusuf \u015eevki HAKYEMEZ \u00a0 \u00a0 Selahaddin MENTE\u015e \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131lmaz AK\u00c7\u0130L Raport\u00f6r : Yusuf Enes KAYA Ba\u015fvurucu : Emre KEND\u0130R \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme i\u00e7in ceza infaz kurumunda ge\u00e7irilmesi gereken s\u00fcrenin \u00fc\u00e7te iki yerine d\u00f6rtte \u00fc\u00e7 olarak belirlenmesi nedeniyle su\u00e7ta ve cezada kanunilik ilkesinin; ko\u015fullu sal\u0131vermeye ili\u015fkin d\u00fczenlemede su\u00e7a g\u00f6re ayr\u0131m yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle de e\u015fitlik ilkesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda D\u00fczce Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na (FET\u00d6\/PDY) \u00fcye olma su\u00e7undan soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu 5\/3\/2018 tarihiyle 12\/3\/2018 tarihi aras\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. D\u00fczce 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 11\/11\/2019 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun 6 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf talebi reddedildikten sonra Yarg\u0131tay 3. Ceza Dairesince 13\/10\/2021 tarihinde mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc onanarak kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir. 5. D\u00fczce T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumunda bulunan ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 14\/12\/2021 tarihinde m\u00fcddetname d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. 6. Ba\u015fvurucu 17\/12\/2021 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle m\u00fcddetnameye itiraz ederek ko\u015fullu sal\u0131verilme tarihlerinin hatal\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, 14\/4\/2020 tarihli ve 7242 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n