T.C.<\/p>\n
YARGITAY<\/p>\n
9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/p>\n
Esas Numaras\u0131: 2024\/12205<\/p>\n
Karar Numaras\u0131: 2024\/15970<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10.12.2024<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eTEN AYRILI\u015e KODU<\/p>\n
AHLAK VE \u0130Y\u0130N\u0130YET KURALLARINA UYMAYAN HALLER<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eVEREN\u0130N \u0130\u015e AKD\u0130N\u0130 HAKLI NEDENLE FESH\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00d6ZET\u0130: Daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 05.01.2023 tarihli fesih ihtarnamesinde de, fesih sebebi olarak i\u015fyerinde davac\u0131 ve dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiden haberdar olundu\u011fu, ahl\u00e2ka mugayir bir k\u0131s\u0131m foto\u011fraflar ve yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fanan ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisinin i\u015fyerinde de devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince gere\u011fince feshedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u015eu h\u00e2lde i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun daval\u0131 i\u015fverence dayan\u0131lan fesih sebebine uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle davan\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fc \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc<\/p>\n
\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul Anadolu 5. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tespit davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilli taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. DAVA<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 05.01.2023 tarihinde haks\u0131z ve bildirimsiz olarak feshedildi\u011fi tarihe kadar 22 y\u0131ld\u0131r daval\u0131 \u015eirkete ait i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f nedenine ili\u015fkin kodun Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumuna (SGK) (46) (i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan haks\u0131z feshi) olarak bildirildi\u011fini, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak bildirim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taraflar\u0131n arabuluculuk neticesinde 03.02.2023 tarihli anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram, genel tatil \u00fccreti, ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 \u00f6demesinin yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 bildirilmesi nedeni ile i\u015fsizlik \u00fccreti alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki kodun d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. CEVAP<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davan\u0131n SGK’ya kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, Kurumun ihbar olunan olarak yer almas\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkili \u015eirket y\u00f6n\u00fcnden husumet yoklu\u011fu nedeni ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n 18.06.2004-05.01.2023 tarihleri aras\u0131nda en son b\u00f6lge sorumlusu olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n sorumlusu ve ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00d6.B. isimli kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla bir s\u00fcredir g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funa dair g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve yaz\u0131\u015fma kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n ihbar olarak g\u00f6nderilen bir elektronik postayla \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fini, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015fa ili\u015fkin kodun do\u011fru bildirildi\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; konuya ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihatlar gere\u011fince i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun d\u00fczeltilmesine y\u00f6nelik tespit davalar\u0131n\u0131n kanuni muhatab\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fveren oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 05.01.2023 tarihinde feshedildi\u011fi, dosyada m\u00fcbrez 03.02.2023 tarihli arabuluculuk anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti olmak \u00fczere bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6deme yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denece\u011fi hususunda anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131 \u015eirket y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olan arabuluculuk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine g\u00f6re i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denerek feshedildi\u011fi, 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun (4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendine g\u00f6re bildirilen i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespiti ile, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 sebep bildirilmeksizin feshine ili\u015fkin (04) olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n
A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu, kabule ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7enin ise dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zira i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih gerek\u00e7eleri ile sunulan delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dava konusu olay\u0131n zorunlu arabuluculu\u011fa t\u00e2bi olmamas\u0131 ve taraflarca dava konusuyla ilgili zorunlu arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmemesine ra\u011fmen bu hususta h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin m\u00fcvekkili \u015eirket taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini, bu durumun dosyada m\u00fcbrez delillerle sabit oldu\u011funu, gerek tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 gerek elektronik posta i\u00e7eri\u011finden davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011fu, aralar\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri i\u00e7erisinde devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi \u00fczerine savunma istenilen davac\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 savunma vermekten imtina etti\u011fini, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini ve buna ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f koduyla bildirim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n amirleri olan genel m\u00fcd\u00fcre, pazarlama m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerine at\u0131lan e-posta i\u00e7eri\u011finde, davac\u0131n\u0131n cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131n foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ili\u015fki i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011fu \u00d6.B. ile ma\u011faza i\u00e7erisindeki ofis b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde samimi ve \u00f6p\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri foto\u011fraflar\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m ahl\u00e2ka mugayir yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ya\u015fanan olay kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda hem davac\u0131n\u0131n hem de ili\u015fki ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini, davac\u0131ya arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri sonucu bir k\u0131s\u0131m tazminat \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fini de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyece\u011fini, zira davac\u0131ya s\u00f6z konusu bedellerin m\u00fcvekkili \u015eirkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre ve konumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak iyiniyet kapsam\u0131nda sa\u011flanan anla\u015fma do\u011frultusunda \u00f6dendi\u011fini beyanla \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; davac\u0131n\u0131n 05.01.2023 tarihli noter ihtarnamesi ile, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendine g\u00f6re feshedildi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015f olup, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011finin bildirilmesi \u00fczerine SGK’ya verilen ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun (46) olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 i\u00e7in arabulucuya ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131 d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6denmesi \u015feklinde neticelendi\u011fi, daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demek sureti ile feshin hakl\u0131 sebebe dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re SGK’ya bildirilen ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun (04) olarak d\u00fczeltilmesi gerekti\u011fi, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin buna uygun olarak karar verdi\u011fi, karar gerek\u00e7esinin dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun ve yeterli oldu\u011fu, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n bu konudaki istinaf talebinin reddi gerekti\u011fi, ancak yarg\u0131lama giderleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hatal\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n belirtilen sebeple s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih nedenine ili\u015fkin olarak bildirilen i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespitine ve i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun ”(04) koduyla belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 sebep bildirilmeksizin feshi ” olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n
A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda; istinaf ba\u015fvuru sebeplerini tekrar etmi\u015f ve inceleme s\u0131ras\u0131nda resen g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken di\u011fer nedenlerle B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozularak ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n
1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 bildirilip bildirilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n
1. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 106 nc\u0131 maddesi, 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 371 inci maddesi.<\/p>\n
2. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi.<\/p>\n
3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
1. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 i\u015fverence haks\u0131z feshedildi\u011fini, SGK’ya verilen i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki kodun 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince (46) olarak bildirilmesinin haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu, ihtiyari arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri sonucunda k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6dendi\u011fini beyanla kodun d\u00fczeltilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. Mahkemece, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi sonucunda davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denece\u011fi hususunda anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f ise de var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 dosya kapsam\u0131yla uyu\u015fmamakt\u0131r. Zira dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re evli oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00d6.B. isimli kad\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7iyle ili\u015fki ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n da evli oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, bu ili\u015fkinin i\u015fyeri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131nca da bilindi\u011fi, bu durumun i\u015fyerinde ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ortam\u0131nda da devam etti\u011fi dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelerle sabittir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n da bu y\u00f6ndeki iddiay\u0131 ink\u00e2r anlam\u0131na gelecek bir savunmas\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Aksine, bu durumun i\u015fin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcm\u00fcne engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fe yans\u0131yan olumsuz bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek bu ili\u015fkiyi kabul etmektedir.<\/p>\n
3. Daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 05.01.2023 tarihli fesih ihtarnamesinde de, fesih sebebi olarak i\u015fyerinde davac\u0131 ve dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiden haberdar olundu\u011fu, ahl\u00e2ka mugayir bir k\u0131s\u0131m foto\u011fraflar ve yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fanan ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisinin i\u015fyerinde de devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince gere\u011fince feshedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u015eu h\u00e2lde i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun daval\u0131 i\u015fverence dayan\u0131lan fesih sebebine uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Belirtilen maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle davan\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fc \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VI. KARAR<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n
Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n
10.12.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
legalbank.net<\/p>\n
\u200bT.C.<\/p>\n
YARGITAY<\/p>\n
9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/p>\n
Esas Numaras\u0131: 2024\/12205<\/p>\n
Karar Numaras\u0131: 2024\/15970<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10.12.2024<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eTEN AYRILI\u015e KODU<\/p>\n
AHLAK VE \u0130Y\u0130N\u0130YET KURALLARINA UYMAYAN HALLER<\/p>\n
\u0130\u015eVEREN\u0130N \u0130\u015e AKD\u0130N\u0130 HAKLI NEDENLE FESH\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00d6ZET\u0130: Daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 05.01.2023 tarihli fesih ihtarnamesinde de, fesih sebebi olarak i\u015fyerinde davac\u0131 ve dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiden haberdar olundu\u011fu, ahl\u00e2ka mugayir bir k\u0131s\u0131m foto\u011fraflar ve yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fanan ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisinin i\u015fyerinde de devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince gere\u011fince feshedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u015eu h\u00e2lde i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun daval\u0131 i\u015fverence dayan\u0131lan fesih sebebine uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle davan\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fc \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc<\/p>\n
\u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul Anadolu 5. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi<\/p>\n
Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tespit davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131 daval\u0131 vekilli taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle; kesinlik, s\u00fcre, temyiz \u015fart\u0131 ve di\u011fer usul eksiklikleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yap\u0131lan \u00f6n inceleme sonucunda temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten ve Tetkik H\u00e2kimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor dinlendikten sonra dosyadaki belgeler incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
I. DAVA<\/p>\n
Davac\u0131 vekili dava dilek\u00e7esinde; davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 05.01.2023 tarihinde haks\u0131z ve bildirimsiz olarak feshedildi\u011fi tarihe kadar 22 y\u0131ld\u0131r daval\u0131 \u015eirkete ait i\u015fyerinde \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f nedenine ili\u015fkin kodun Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik Kurumuna (SGK) (46) (i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan haks\u0131z feshi) olarak bildirildi\u011fini, daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a ger\u00e7e\u011fe ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak bildirim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, taraflar\u0131n arabuluculuk neticesinde 03.02.2023 tarihli anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma, hafta tatili, ulusal bayram, genel tatil \u00fccreti, ihbar tazminat\u0131 ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 olmak \u00fczere i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 \u00f6demesinin yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 bildirilmesi nedeni ile i\u015fsizlik \u00fccreti alamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki kodun d\u00fczeltilmesine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. CEVAP<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili cevap dilek\u00e7esinde; davan\u0131n SGK’ya kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini, Kurumun ihbar olunan olarak yer almas\u0131n\u0131n hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkili \u015eirket y\u00f6n\u00fcnden husumet yoklu\u011fu nedeni ile davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fini, davac\u0131n\u0131n 18.06.2004-05.01.2023 tarihleri aras\u0131nda en son b\u00f6lge sorumlusu olarak g\u00f6rev yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n sorumlusu ve ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00d6.B. isimli kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla bir s\u00fcredir g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7inde oldu\u011funa dair g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve yaz\u0131\u015fma kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n ihbar olarak g\u00f6nderilen bir elektronik postayla \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fini, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015fa ili\u015fkin kodun do\u011fru bildirildi\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
III. \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131yla; konuya ili\u015fkin i\u00e7tihatlar gere\u011fince i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun d\u00fczeltilmesine y\u00f6nelik tespit davalar\u0131n\u0131n kanuni muhatab\u0131n\u0131n i\u015fveren oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 05.01.2023 tarihinde feshedildi\u011fi, dosyada m\u00fcbrez 03.02.2023 tarihli arabuluculuk anla\u015fma tutana\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131, ihbar tazminat\u0131, fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma \u00fccreti, hafta tatili \u00fccreti, ulusal bayram ve genel tatil \u00fccreti olmak \u00fczere bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6deme yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denece\u011fi hususunda anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle daval\u0131 \u015eirket y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olan arabuluculuk s\u00f6zle\u015fmesine g\u00f6re i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin ihbar ve k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denerek feshedildi\u011fi, 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u015f Kanunu’nun (4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendine g\u00f6re bildirilen i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespiti ile, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 sebep bildirilmeksizin feshine ili\u015fkin (04) olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130ST\u0130NAF<\/p>\n
A. \u0130stinaf Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n
\u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. \u0130stinaf Sebepleri<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili istinaf ba\u015fvurusunda; \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiz oldu\u011funu, kabule ili\u015fkin gerek\u00e7enin ise dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zira i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih gerek\u00e7eleri ile sunulan delillerin gerek\u00e7eli kararda tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, dava konusu olay\u0131n zorunlu arabuluculu\u011fa t\u00e2bi olmamas\u0131 ve taraflarca dava konusuyla ilgili zorunlu arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilmemesine ra\u011fmen bu hususta h\u00fck\u00fcm tesis edilmesinin hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funu, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin m\u00fcvekkili \u015eirket taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini, bu durumun dosyada m\u00fcbrez delillerle sabit oldu\u011funu, gerek tan\u0131k anlat\u0131mlar\u0131 gerek elektronik posta i\u00e7eri\u011finden davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisi bulundu\u011fu, aralar\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkinin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma saatleri i\u00e7erisinde devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, olay\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenilmesi \u00fczerine savunma istenilen davac\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 savunma vermekten imtina etti\u011fini, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini ve buna ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f koduyla bildirim yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davac\u0131n\u0131n amirleri olan genel m\u00fcd\u00fcre, pazarlama m\u00fcd\u00fcrlerine at\u0131lan e-posta i\u00e7eri\u011finde, davac\u0131n\u0131n cinsel organ\u0131n\u0131n foto\u011fraf\u0131n\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ili\u015fki i\u00e7erisinde oldu\u011fu \u00d6.B. ile ma\u011faza i\u00e7erisindeki ofis b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde samimi ve \u00f6p\u00fc\u015ft\u00fckleri foto\u011fraflar\u0131, bir k\u0131s\u0131m ahl\u00e2ka mugayir yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, ya\u015fanan olay kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda hem davac\u0131n\u0131n hem de ili\u015fki ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fini, davac\u0131ya arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri sonucu bir k\u0131s\u0131m tazminat \u00f6demesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011fi ger\u00e7e\u011fini de\u011fi\u015ftirmeyece\u011fini, zira davac\u0131ya s\u00f6z konusu bedellerin m\u00fcvekkili \u015eirkette \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre ve konumu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurularak iyiniyet kapsam\u0131nda sa\u011flanan anla\u015fma do\u011frultusunda \u00f6dendi\u011fini beyanla \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e ve Sonu\u00e7<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da tarih ve say\u0131s\u0131 belirtilen karar\u0131 ile; davac\u0131n\u0131n 05.01.2023 tarihli noter ihtarnamesi ile, i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendine g\u00f6re feshedildi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015f olup, i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin hakl\u0131 nedenle feshedildi\u011finin bildirilmesi \u00fczerine SGK’ya verilen ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun (46) olarak d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi ancak davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131 i\u00e7in arabulucuya ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesinin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131 d\u00e2hil olmak \u00fczere bir k\u0131s\u0131m i\u015f\u00e7ilik alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n banka hesab\u0131na \u00f6denmesi \u015feklinde neticelendi\u011fi, daval\u0131 i\u015fverenin k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminatlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6demek sureti ile feshin hakl\u0131 sebebe dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti\u011fi, buna g\u00f6re SGK’ya bildirilen ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun (04) olarak d\u00fczeltilmesi gerekti\u011fi, \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesinin buna uygun olarak karar verdi\u011fi, karar gerek\u00e7esinin dosya kapsam\u0131na uygun ve yeterli oldu\u011fu, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n bu konudaki istinaf talebinin reddi gerekti\u011fi, ancak yarg\u0131lama giderleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hatal\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm kuruldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n belirtilen sebeple s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131 i\u015f\u00e7inin i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin fesih nedenine ili\u015fkin olarak bildirilen i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 oldu\u011funun tespitine ve i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun ”(04) koduyla belirsiz s\u00fcreli i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan hakl\u0131 sebep bildirilmeksizin feshi ” olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine dair karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
V. TEMY\u0130Z<\/p>\n
A. Temyiz Yoluna Ba\u015fvuranlar<\/p>\n
B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesinin yukar\u0131da belirtilen karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde daval\u0131 vekili temyiz isteminde bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
B. Temyiz Sebepleri<\/p>\n
Daval\u0131 vekili temyiz ba\u015fvurusunda; istinaf ba\u015fvuru sebeplerini tekrar etmi\u015f ve inceleme s\u0131ras\u0131nda resen g\u00f6zetilmesi gereken di\u011fer nedenlerle B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n bozularak ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesini talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
C. Gerek\u00e7e<\/p>\n
1. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k ve Hukuki Nitelendirme<\/p>\n
Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f kodunun hatal\u0131 bildirilip bildirilmedi\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. \u0130lgili Hukuk<\/p>\n
1. 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu’nun (6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun) 106 nc\u0131 maddesi, 369 uncu maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 371 inci maddesi.<\/p>\n
2. 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi.<\/p>\n
3. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
1. Somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta davac\u0131 i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin daval\u0131 i\u015fverence haks\u0131z feshedildi\u011fini, SGK’ya verilen i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki kodun 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince (46) olarak bildirilmesinin haks\u0131z ve dayanaks\u0131z oldu\u011funu, ihtiyari arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeleri sonucunda k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6dendi\u011fini beyanla kodun d\u00fczeltilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. Mahkemece, taraflar aras\u0131ndaki arabuluculuk g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmesi sonucunda davac\u0131ya k\u0131dem ve ihbar tazminat\u0131 \u00f6denece\u011fi hususunda anla\u015fmaya var\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f ise de var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7 dosya kapsam\u0131yla uyu\u015fmamakt\u0131r. Zira dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re evli oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 \u00d6.B. isimli kad\u0131n i\u015f\u00e7iyle ili\u015fki ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131n da evli oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fi, bu ili\u015fkinin i\u015fyeri \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131nca da bilindi\u011fi, bu durumun i\u015fyerinde ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma ortam\u0131nda da devam etti\u011fi dosyadaki bilgi ve belgelerle sabittir. Davac\u0131n\u0131n da bu y\u00f6ndeki iddiay\u0131 ink\u00e2r anlam\u0131na gelecek bir savunmas\u0131 bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Aksine, bu durumun i\u015fin y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fcm\u00fcne engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015fe yans\u0131yan olumsuz bir durum bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek bu ili\u015fkiyi kabul etmektedir.<\/p>\n
3. Daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 05.01.2023 tarihli fesih ihtarnamesinde de, fesih sebebi olarak i\u015fyerinde davac\u0131 ve dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiden haberdar olundu\u011fu, ahl\u00e2ka mugayir bir k\u0131s\u0131m foto\u011fraflar ve yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fanan ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisinin i\u015fyerinde de devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince gere\u011fince feshedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u015eu h\u00e2lde i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun daval\u0131 i\u015fverence dayan\u0131lan fesih sebebine uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. Belirtilen maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle davan\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fc \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
VI. KARAR<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle;<\/p>\n
Temyiz olunan B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA,<\/p>\n
Pe\u015fin al\u0131nan temyiz karar harc\u0131n\u0131n istek h\u00e2linde ilgiliye iadesine,<\/p>\n
Dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine,<\/p>\n
10.12.2024 tarihinde oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n
legalbank.net\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. YARGITAY 9. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 Esas Numaras\u0131: 2024\/12205 Karar Numaras\u0131: 2024\/15970 Karar Tarihi: 10.12.2024 \u0130\u015eTEN AYRILI\u015e KODU AHLAK VE \u0130Y\u0130N\u0130YET KURALLARINA UYMAYAN HALLER \u0130\u015eVEREN\u0130N \u0130\u015e AKD\u0130N\u0130 HAKLI NEDENLE FESH\u0130 \u00d6ZET\u0130: Daval\u0131 i\u015fverence 05.01.2023 tarihli fesih ihtarnamesinde de, fesih sebebi olarak i\u015fyerinde davac\u0131 ve dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 kad\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan aras\u0131ndaki ili\u015fkiden haberdar olundu\u011fu, ahl\u00e2ka mugayir bir k\u0131s\u0131m foto\u011fraflar ve yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n ya\u015fanan ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koydu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n ast\u0131 konumundaki \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanla ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6n\u00fcl ili\u015fkisinin i\u015fyerinde de devam etti\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin 4857 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 25 inci maddesinin (II) numaral\u0131 bendinin (e) alt bendi gere\u011fince gere\u011fince feshedildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. \u015eu h\u00e2lde i\u015ften ayr\u0131l\u0131\u015f bildirgesindeki \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kodunun daval\u0131 i\u015fverence dayan\u0131lan fesih sebebine uygun olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131nda hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Belirtilen maddi ve hukuki olgular g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik inceleme ve yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmeyle davan\u0131n reddi yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle kabul\u00fc \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm tesisi hatal\u0131 olup bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. KARAR : \u0130stinaf ba\u015fvurusunun kabul\u00fc ile davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc \u0130LK DERECE MAHKEMES\u0130 : \u0130stanbul Anadolu 5. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki tespit davas\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesince davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131n daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine, B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesince ba\u015fvurunun kabul\u00fc ile \u0130lk Derece Mahkemesi h\u00fckm\u00fc kald\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden esas hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmak suretiyle davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6lge …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n