T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
FES\u0130H KARAKO\u00c7 BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/41832)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Metin KIRATLI<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
\u015eehadet \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Fesih KARAKO\u00c7<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Soran Haldi MIZRAK<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir ve \u00f6nlenebilir nitelikteki bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen yaralanma temelinde olu\u015fan zararlar\u0131n tazmini talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smen reddedilmesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. 5\/6\/2015 tarihinde Halklar\u0131n Demokratik Partisi taraf\u0131ndan Diyarbak\u0131r’da d\u00fczenlenen ve ba\u015fvurucunun da kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7im mitingine bombal\u0131 ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu da bu ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 sonucu yaralanm\u0131\u015f, hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen engelli sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporuna g\u00f6re %21 oran\u0131nda v\u00fccut fonksiyon kayb\u0131 ya\u015fam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu; miting s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu bacak kemiklerinin k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sa\u011f kula\u011f\u0131nda perde y\u0131rt\u0131lmas\u0131 ve v\u00fccudunda yan\u0131klar olu\u015ftu\u011funu belirtip ya\u015fanan olayda daval\u0131 idarenin hizmet kusuru bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n tazmini i\u00e7in Diyarbak\u0131r 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) nezdinde tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
4. \u0130dare Mahkemesi olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 miting alan\u0131nda g\u00f6revli idare ajanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerini uygulama a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan g\u00f6revlerini tam olarak yerine getirmemesi nedeniyle olayda idarenin hizmet kusuru bulundu\u011fu kanaatine vararak ba\u015fvurucunun u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n idarenin hizmet kusuru esas\u0131na g\u00f6re kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kabul etmi\u015f ve 17\/5\/2018 tarihinde davay\u0131 k\u0131smen kabul ederek 122.039,80 TL maddi tazminat ile 20.000 TL manevi tazminat\u0131n ba\u015fvurucuya \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Karar\u0131n taraflarca istinaf edilmesi \u00fczerine Gaziantep B\u00f6lge \u0130dare Mahkemesi \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u0130dari Dava Dairesi (\u0130stinaf Mahkemesi) 28\/1\/2021 tarihinde verdi\u011fi kesin nitelikli karar\u0131nda taraflar\u0131n manevi tazminat a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 istinaf ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 reddetmi\u015ftir. Maddi tazminat a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmede ise ba\u015fvurucunun istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu reddetmi\u015f, daval\u0131 idarenin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu ise k\u0131smen kabul ederek ba\u015fvurucuya5.815,88 TL maddi tazminat \u00f6denmesine karar vermi\u015ftir. 17\/7\/2004 tarihli ve 5233 say\u0131l\u0131 Ter\u00f6r ve Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadeleden Do\u011fan Zararlar\u0131n Kar\u015f\u0131lanmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun ve sosyal risk ilkesine ili\u015fkin geni\u015f \u00e7apl\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klaman\u0131n yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde, ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 niteli\u011fini haiz olayda idareye atf\u0131 kabil bir kusurun bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle yaralanan ba\u015fvurucunun maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n\u0131n tazmini talebinin 5233 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurucu vekili nihai nitelikteki bu karar\u0131 Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden 16\/4\/2021 tarihinde okumu\u015ftur. Ba\u015fvuru 20\/5\/2021tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Komisyon, ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucu; 5\/6\/2015 tarihinde Diyarbak\u0131r’da kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 mitinge yap\u0131lan ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 sonucu a\u011f\u0131r \u015fekilde yaraland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay\u0131n \u015f\u00fcphelisi olan \u015fah\u0131s aranan \u015fah\u0131slardan olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen olaydan \u00f6nce kolluk g\u00f6revlilerince eksik sorgulama yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu ihmal nedeniyle gerekli i\u015flemlerin zaman\u0131nda yap\u0131lamay\u0131p olaylar\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcne ge\u00e7ilemedi\u011fini, s\u00f6z konusu kolluk g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6revi ihmal su\u00e7undan ceza davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ya\u015fanan olay idarenin a\u011f\u0131r hizmet kusuru sonucu ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesine ra\u011fmen tazminat taleplerinin 5233 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilip k\u0131smen kabul edildi\u011fini belirterek ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Bireysel ba\u015fvurunun \u00f6n \u015fartlar\u0131ndan biri de ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresidir. S\u00fcre, ba\u015fvurunun her a\u015famas\u0131nda dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken bir usul h\u00fckm\u00fcd\u00fcr (Deniz Baykal, B. No: 2013\/7521, 4\/12\/2013, \u00a7 32). 30\/3\/2011 tarihli ve 6216 say\u0131l\u0131 Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kurulu\u015fu ve Yarg\u0131lama Usulleri Hakk\u0131nda Kanun\u2019un 47. maddesinin (5) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 ile Anayasa Mahkemesi \u0130\u00e7t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’n\u00fcn 64. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 gere\u011fi bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketildi\u011fi, ba\u015fvuru yolu \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f ise ihlalin \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi tarihten itibaren otuz g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
10. Anayasa Mahkemesi H\u00fcseyin A\u015fkan (B. No: 2017\/15649, 21\/7\/2020, \u00a7\u00a7 20, 23) karar\u0131nda bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden nihai karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinin tebli\u011finin \u00f6\u011frenme \u015fekillerden biri oldu\u011funu ancak ba\u015fka \u015fekillerde de \u00f6\u011frenmenin s\u00f6z konusu olabilece\u011fini ifade etmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararda ayr\u0131ca kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131klar\u0131 i\u015flemlerin (dok\u00fcman olu\u015fturma, d\u00fczenleme, imzalama, a\u00e7ma, okuma ve yazd\u0131rma vb.) kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 evrak i\u015flem k\u00fct\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn Anayasa Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan incelenmesi sonucunda nihai karar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131larak okundu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bir i\u015flemin tespiti h\u00e2linde bu i\u015flemi yapan ilgililerin i\u015flem s\u0131ras\u0131nda nihai karar\u0131n sonucunu \u00f6\u011frendiklerinin kabul edilece\u011fi, b\u00f6yle bir durumda bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin de bu tarihten itibaren ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir (H\u00fcseyin A\u015fkan, \u00a7\u00a7 26-29).<\/p>\n
11. Somut olayda ba\u015fvuruya konu davaya ili\u015fkin nihai karar olan \u0130stinaf Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucu vekilince UYAP’tan 16\/4\/2021 tarihinde okundu\u011fu tespit edilmi\u015ftir. Nihai karar ba\u015fvurucu vekili taraf\u0131ndan 16\/4\/2021 tarihinde UYAP’tan okundu\u011funa g\u00f6re s\u00f6z konusu tarihte nihai karardan haberdar olundu\u011fu, bu do\u011frultuda bireysel ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresinin belirtilen tarihten itibaren i\u015flemeye ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir. Sonu\u00e7 olarak nihai karar\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenildi\u011fi 16\/4\/2021 tarihinden itibaren otuz g\u00fcnl\u00fck ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi ge\u00e7tikten sonra 20\/5\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunuldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
12. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun di\u011fer kabul edilebilirlik ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmeksizin s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcre a\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 17\/12\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 17\/12\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/41832 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 FES\u0130H KARAKO\u00c7 BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/41832) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 17\/12\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Metin KIRATLI Raport\u00f6r : \u015eehadet \u00d6ZT\u00dcRK Ba\u015fvurucu : Fesih KARAKO\u00c7 Vekili : Av. Soran Haldi MIZRAK \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, kamu makamlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir ve \u00f6nlenebilir nitelikteki bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu meydana gelen yaralanma temelinde olu\u015fan zararlar\u0131n tazmini talebiyle a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n k\u0131smen reddedilmesi nedeniyle ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ve adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. 5\/6\/2015 tarihinde Halklar\u0131n Demokratik Partisi taraf\u0131ndan Diyarbak\u0131r’da d\u00fczenlenen ve ba\u015fvurucunun da kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 se\u00e7im mitingine bombal\u0131 ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu da bu ter\u00f6r sald\u0131r\u0131s\u0131 sonucu yaralanm\u0131\u015f, hakk\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen engelli sa\u011fl\u0131k kurulu raporuna g\u00f6re %21 oran\u0131nda v\u00fccut fonksiyon kayb\u0131 ya\u015fam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu; miting s\u0131ras\u0131nda meydana gelen bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 sonucu bacak kemiklerinin k\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, sa\u011f kula\u011f\u0131nda perde y\u0131rt\u0131lmas\u0131 ve v\u00fccudunda yan\u0131klar olu\u015ftu\u011funu belirtip ya\u015fanan olayda daval\u0131 idarenin hizmet kusuru bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrerek u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi ve manevi zararlar\u0131n tazmini i\u00e7in Diyarbak\u0131r 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi (\u0130dare Mahkemesi) nezdinde tam yarg\u0131 davas\u0131 a\u00e7m\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 4. \u0130dare Mahkemesi olay\u0131n ya\u015fand\u0131\u011f\u0131 miting alan\u0131nda g\u00f6revli idare ajanlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik tedbirlerini uygulama …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n