T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
GERNAS ATU\u011e BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/35263)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 24\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Gernas ATU\u011e<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali BOZAN<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011franmas\u0131 ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucu8\/12\/2019 tarihinde sahte kimlik ile Yunanistan’a ka\u00e7ak yollarla \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapmak isterken yakalanm\u0131\u015f, PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu ve 17\/10\/2017 tarihinde kollu\u011fa ait bir personel servis arac\u0131na yap\u0131lan bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 olay\u0131n\u0131n faili oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131narak 10\/12\/2019 tarihinde Mersin’e nakledilmi\u015ftir. Toplam on g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucunun 19\/12\/2019 tarihinde tutuklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvurucu, vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 24\/12\/2019 tarihinde Mersin Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) iletti\u011fi dilek\u00e7eyle, g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndayken Mersin \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (TEM) binas\u0131nda fiziksel \u015fiddet uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek kamu g\u00f6revlilerinden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Bu \u015fik\u00e2yete g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu 10\/12\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc TEM binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131nca \u00f6nce kameralar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ifade alma odas\u0131nda, sonrada kameralar\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 avukat g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme odas\u0131nda ve koridorda kameralar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda olan bir noktada fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011fram\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvurucu, kendisine \u015fiddet uygulayan polis memurlar\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015f; delil olarak kamera kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ve sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturma ba\u015flatarak ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131 giri\u015f, \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n, t\u00fcm adli raporlar\u0131n, m\u00fcdafi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme tutanaklar\u0131n\u0131n, ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde avukat g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f odas\u0131n\u0131n giri\u015f kap\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6ren kameralar\u0131n ve ba\u015fvurucunun kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 nezarathaneye ait kameralar\u0131n, TEM binas\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik kameralar\u0131n\u0131n kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderilmesini m\u00fczekkereyle talep etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki sa\u011fl\u0131k raporlar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
i. Edirne’de al\u0131nan 9\/12\/2019 tarihli genel adli muayene raporunda ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudunda herhangi bir darp veya cebir izi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
ii. Ba\u015fvurucu i\u00e7in Mersin Toros Hastanesinden al\u0131nan 10\/12\/2019ve 19\/12\/2019 tarihli genel adli muayene raporlar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun v\u00fccudunda herhangi bir darp veya cebir izi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iii. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Mersin Toros Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen 12\/12\/2019 tarihli genel adli muayene raporunda “\u0130ki g\u00fcn \u00f6nce oldu\u011funu beyan etti\u011fi (duvara \u00e7arpma) sol frontalde [al\u0131n b\u00f6gesi] a\u011fr\u0131dan bahsediyor, \u00f6nde frontal 2-3cm.lik eski lineer s\u0131yr\u0131k.” tespitlerine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
iv. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda Mersin Toros Hastanesince d\u00fczenlenen 16\/12\/2019 tarihli genel adli muayene raporunda “Boyun sol taraf\u0131nda a\u011fr\u0131 ve hassasiyet vard\u0131r. Eklem …[okunamad\u0131] a\u011fr\u0131 …..[okunamad\u0131]. \u0130nspeksiyonda [Hastan\u0131n ilk fiziki muayenesi] lezyon saptanmad\u0131. Hastan\u0131n beyanlar\u0131 yukar\u0131daki \u015fekildeydi.” ifadeleri edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa TEM taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6nderilen 7\/1\/2020 tarihli cevap yaz\u0131s\u0131nda; 14\/11\/2019-31\/12\/2019 tarihleri aras\u0131nda TEM binas\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik kamera sisteminin modernizasyon i\u015flemlerinin yap\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle kameralar\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisi verildi\u011fi, modernizasyona ili\u015fkin olarak 1\/11\/2018 tarihli TEM binas\u0131ndaki nezarethane ve ifade alma odalar\u0131n\u0131n kamera ve ses sisteminin yenilemesine dair Valilik onay yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n ve sonraki s\u00fcrece ili\u015fkin ihale evraklar\u0131n\u0131n sunuldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k 3\/3\/2020 tarihinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. Bu karar\u0131na gerek\u00e7e olarak Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k, doktor raporlar\u0131nda ba\u015fvurucunun beyanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re v\u00fccudun baz\u0131 yerlerinde a\u011fr\u0131 ve hassasiyet oldu\u011fu ifade edilerek lezyon saptanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda fiziksel i\u015fkenceye u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131n\u0131n soyut nitelikte oldu\u011funun belirtildi\u011fini g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan karara itiraz\u0131 sulh ceza h\u00e2kimli\u011fince 10\/6\/2020 tarihinde kesin olarak reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
7. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 6\/10\/2020 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 4\/11\/2020 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvurucu; Edirne’de yakaland\u0131ktan sonra hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda al\u0131nan yakalama karar\u0131 nedeniyle g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Mersin TEM binas\u0131nda polis memurlar\u0131n\u0131n kendisine fiziksel \u015fiddet uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu olay nedeniyle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fik\u00e2yetin etkili \u015fekilde soru\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde \u00f6ncelikle olaya ili\u015fkin s\u00fcrece ve konuya ili\u015fkin insan haklar\u0131 yarg\u0131s\u0131 i\u00e7tihad\u0131nayer verilmi\u015f, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonu\u00e7tan ay\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren maddi ya da hukuki bir nedenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvuru, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131nda g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nan k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
11. K\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kalmalar\u0131 nedeniyle ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filer – ispat k\u00fclfetinin devlete ge\u00e7ti\u011fi durumlar h\u00e2ri\u00e7 olmak olmak \u00fczere- k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 kapsam\u0131na giren a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kta bir muamele g\u00f6rm\u00fc\u015f olabileceklerini g\u00f6steren emare ve delilleri, hakl\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7eleri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcrece zaman\u0131nda yetkili makamlara sunma konusunda \u00f6zenli davranmakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Olgulara dayanmayan yetersiz a\u00e7\u0131klamalar, iddialar\u0131n delillerle desteklenmemesi hatta kimi zaman delillerin uyumsuzlu\u011fu veya k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yer, zaman ve di\u011fer konulardaki \u00e7eli\u015fkili ifadeler gibi hususlar k\u00f6t\u00fc muamelenin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fini \u015f\u00fcpheye d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcr. Bu durumda iddian\u0131n savunabilir oldu\u011fundan, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu iddialara ili\u015fkin derh\u00e2l resm\u00ee bir soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011finden s\u00f6z edilemez. Kald\u0131 ki iddialar\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir dayanak ile birlikte yetkili merciler nezdinde dile getirilmemesi h\u00e2linde ma\u011fdur oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren ki\u015filerin etkili bir soru\u015fturma y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmesine ili\u015fkin me\u015fru (hakl\u0131) bir beklentiye girebileceklerini s\u00f6yleyebilmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir (Beyza Metin, B. No: 2014\/19426, 12\/12\/2018, \u00a7 \u00a7 45-47).<\/p>\n
12. Ba\u015fvurucu, u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti\u011fi k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele eylemlerini gerek ba\u015fvuru formunda gerekse ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131nda detayland\u0131rmaks\u0131z\u0131n, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresince al\u0131nan toplam be\u015f adli muayene raporunun \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnde darp ve cebir izine rastlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ikisinde ise ba\u015fvurucunun beyan\u0131 \u00fczerine al\u0131n ve boyun b\u00f6lgesinde a\u011fr\u0131 ve hassasiyet bulundu\u011fu bilgisine yer verildi\u011fi ancak al\u0131n b\u00f6lgesindeki a\u011fr\u0131ya ili\u015fkin kayda “duvara \u00e7arpma” notunun eklendi\u011fi, bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda 2-3 cm’lik eski bir s\u0131yr\u0131k d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda lezyon bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinin yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr (bkz.\u00a7 4). Ba\u015fvurucu, maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 muamelenin doktorlar taraf\u0131ndan bilinmesine kar\u015f\u0131n raporlara ge\u00e7irilmedi\u011fini iddia etmedi\u011fi gibi ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleler sonucunda v\u00fccudunda bir yaralanma meydana gelip gelmedi\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bir a\u00e7\u0131klama da yapmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
13. Yukar\u0131da da g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi \u00fczere bir devlet g\u00f6revlisi taraf\u0131ndan Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 17. maddesini ihlal eder bi\u00e7imde bir muameleye tabi tutulmaya ili\u015fkin bir iddian\u0131n soru\u015fturma makam\u0131na iletilmesi durumunda etkili soru\u015fturma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ba\u015flamas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle gerekli olan husus, s\u00f6z konusu iddian\u0131n savunulabilir olmas\u0131d\u0131r. \u0130ddian\u0131n savunulabilir olmas\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131k ve olgulara ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131nt\u0131 i\u00e7ermesinin yan\u0131nda ancak makul kan\u0131tlarla desteklenmesiyle m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu nitelikte bir iddian\u0131n ortaya konulmamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ba\u015flatma y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden dahi bahsedilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n
14. Sonu\u00e7 olarak ba\u015fvurucunun g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda tutuldu\u011fu tarih aral\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kapsayacak \u015fekilde al\u0131nan adli muayene raporlar\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvurucunun ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ciddi fiziksel \u015fiddet iddialar\u0131n\u0131 desteklemedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden k\u00f6t\u00fc muameleye maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin savunulabilir bir iddia ortaya koyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
15. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. K\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 24\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 24\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2020\/35263 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 GERNAS ATU\u011e BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2020\/35263) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 24\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Mustafa Erdem ATLIHAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Gernas ATU\u011e Vekili : Av. Ali BOZAN \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda fiziksel \u015fiddete u\u011franmas\u0131 ve olay hakk\u0131nda etkili bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclmemesi nedeniyle k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucu8\/12\/2019 tarihinde sahte kimlik ile Yunanistan’a ka\u00e7ak yollarla \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yapmak isterken yakalanm\u0131\u015f, PKK\/KCK silahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fc \u00fcyesi oldu\u011fu ve 17\/10\/2017 tarihinde kollu\u011fa ait bir personel servis arac\u0131na yap\u0131lan bombal\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 olay\u0131n\u0131n faili oldu\u011fu \u015f\u00fcphesiyle hakk\u0131nda yakalama karar\u0131 bulundu\u011funun tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131narak 10\/12\/2019 tarihinde Mersin’e nakledilmi\u015ftir. Toplam on g\u00fcn g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda kalan ba\u015fvurucunun 19\/12\/2019 tarihinde tutuklanmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvurucu, vekili arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla 24\/12\/2019 tarihinde Mersin Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) iletti\u011fi dilek\u00e7eyle, g\u00f6zalt\u0131ndayken Mersin \u0130l Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Ter\u00f6rle M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc (TEM) binas\u0131nda fiziksel \u015fiddet uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek kamu g\u00f6revlilerinden \u015fik\u00e2yet\u00e7i olmu\u015ftur. Bu \u015fik\u00e2yete g\u00f6re ba\u015fvurucu 10\/12\/2019 tarihinde g\u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc TEM binas\u0131 i\u00e7inde g\u00f6revli polis memurlar\u0131nca \u00f6nce kameralar\u0131n bulundu\u011fu ifade alma odas\u0131nda, sonrada kameralar\u0131n bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 avukat …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n