T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
MESUT BAYLAV VE SAL\u0130H CAN ALDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/2781)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Engin YILDIRIM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucular<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
1. Mesut BAYLAV<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
2. Salih Can ALDEM\u0130R<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Sevil ARACI<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, yetkili makamlardan izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n kamu alanlar\u0131na afi\u015f as\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvurucular, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7imi’yle ilgili olan bir partiye ait olan afi\u015fleri, kova ve f\u0131r\u00e7a yard\u0131m\u0131yla elektrik trafosunun \u00fcst\u00fcne yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda izinsiz afi\u015f asma kabahatinden 30\/3\/2005 tarihli ve 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun 42. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 259 TL ve 1.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
3. \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu ve \u0130l\u00e7e Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n afi\u015f yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 kamusal alan\u0131n siyasi partilerin afi\u015f ve benzeri materyaller asabilecekleri bir yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ilan ve reklam i\u00e7in kullan\u0131labilecek yerlerden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisini vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 1.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden cezan\u0131n 259 TL olarak d\u00fczeltilmesine karar vermi\u015f ve 259 TL idari para cezas\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ise afi\u015f yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan elektrik trafosunun bu amaca tahsis edilmi\u015f alanlardan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz\u0131 kesin olarak reddetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
5. Ba\u015fvurucular, nihai h\u00fckm\u00fc 20\/12\/2018 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 18\/1\/2019 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015flard\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirlik ve esas incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
II. DE\u011eERLEND\u0130RME<\/p>\n
7. \u00d6deme g\u00fcc\u00fcnden yoksun oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n adli yard\u0131m taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
8. Ba\u015fvurucular siyasi faaliyetler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde yap\u0131lan ilanlar\u0131n vergiye tabi olmamas\u0131 nedeniyle izne de tabi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, afi\u015f asmak i\u00e7in belediyeler taraf\u0131ndan belirlenen \u00f6zel alanlar olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daha \u00f6nceden de ayn\u0131 yerde \u00fcst \u00fcste yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir\u00e7ok afi\u015f oldu\u011funu ve se\u00e7im d\u00f6nemlerinde her yere afi\u015f as\u0131labildi\u011fini belirterek izinsiz afi\u015f asma kabahatinden cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 nedeniyle ifade ve \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ile bir\u00e7ok anayasal haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011finden yak\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, Anayasa ve ilgili mevzuat ile somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131 g\u00f6zetilerek de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Ba\u015fvuru, ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda incelenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yap\u0131lan m\u00fcdahalenin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 42. maddesinin kanunilik \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir. M\u00fcdahalenin Anayasa’n\u0131n 34. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u0131n\u0131rlama sebeplerinden kamu d\u00fczeninin korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu belirlemenin ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahalenin demokratik toplum d\u00fczeninin gereklerine uygun olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden inceleme yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r.<\/p>\n
11. Anayasa Mahkemesinin izinsiz afi\u015f as\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n anayasal haklar\u0131 ihlal edip etmedi\u011fini denetlendi\u011fi \u00f6nceki kararlara ve uygulanan ilkelere Bermal Can ve di\u011ferleri (B. No: 2021\/936, 5\/10\/2023, \u00a7\u00a7 23-28) karar\u0131nda yer verilmi\u015ftir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, izinsiz afi\u015f asma nedeniyle uygulanan idari para cezalar\u0131n\u0131 denetledi\u011fi kararlarda, \u00e7at\u0131\u015fan haklar olan afi\u015flerin as\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle kullan\u0131lmak istenen hak ile sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve dengeli bir \u00e7evrede ya\u015fama hakk\u0131 aras\u0131nda makul bir denge kurulup kurulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015ftir (afi\u015f asma nedeniyle ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen m\u00fcdahalelerden sendika hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Abdulvahap Can ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2014\/3793, 8\/11\/2017, \u00a7 53; toplant\u0131 ve g\u00f6steri y\u00fcr\u00fcy\u00fc\u015f\u00fc d\u00fczenleme hakk\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Sinan Cem \u00d6zt\u00fcrk, B. No: 2016\/13477, 9\/1\/2020, \u00a7 43; Burcu Bardakc\u0131 ve Erdem Yinan\u00e7, B. No: 2016\/13475, 11\/9\/2019, \u00a7 44; ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. G\u00f6k\u00e7e Ekin Baran, B. No: 2016\/13539, 9\/1\/2020, \u00a7 31).<\/p>\n
12. Anayasa Mahkemesi Bermal Can ve di\u011ferleri karar\u0131nda, Anayasa’n\u0131n56. maddesinin devlete ve bireylere \u00e7evrenin korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin baz\u0131 \u00f6devler y\u00fckledi\u011fini, d\u00fczenli ve sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 bir \u00e7evrede ya\u015famaya ili\u015fkin kamu otoritelerinin ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 tedbirlerin toplumun s\u00fck\u00fbnunu, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kamu d\u00fczenini sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in zaruri oldu\u011funu vurgulam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. An\u0131lan kararda, \u00e7evre kirlili\u011fini \u00f6nlemeye ili\u015fkin hukuk normuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak izinsiz afi\u015f yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma nedeniyle uygulanan yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n zorunlu bir sosyal ihtiyac\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131lad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Anayasa Mahkemesi an\u0131lan kanaate var\u0131rken, izin al\u0131nmadan yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan afi\u015flerin ge\u00e7ici nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, d\u00fczenli bir \u00e7evrede ya\u015fam\u0131 koruyan kurallara g\u00f6re afi\u015f as\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde bir engel bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve uygulanan hafif nitelikteki idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerin aktar\u0131lmas\u0131nda cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir etkiye neden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zetmi\u015ftir (Bermal Can ve di\u011ferleri \u00a7\u00a7 29-39; ayn\u0131 y\u00f6ndeki de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Halil Devrim Ula\u015f ve di\u011ferleri, B. No: 2015\/12590, 6\/3\/2019, \u00a7\u00a7 37-45)<\/p>\n
13. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucular, kamusal bir alanda izinsiz afi\u015f ast\u0131klar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle idari para cezas\u0131yla cezaland\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup afi\u015fte yer alan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceler nedeniyle kamu makamlar\u0131nca herhangi bir adli soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ba\u015fvuruya konu eylemin siyasal bir mesele hakk\u0131nda afi\u015f as\u0131lmas\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetildi\u011finde Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 26. maddesinde, yaln\u0131zca ifade edilen fikir ve bilgilerin i\u00e7eri\u011fi de\u011fil bunlar\u0131n ifade edili\u015f bi\u00e7imleri de koruma alt\u0131ndad\u0131r (k\u0131yaslamak i\u00e7in bkz. Fatih Ta\u015f [GK], B. No: 2013\/1461, 12\/11\/2014, \u00a7 105; \u0130rfan Sanc\u0131 (2), B. No: 2018\/5652, 30\/3\/2022, \u00a7 58; Meki Katar [GK], B. No: 2015\/4916, 3\/10\/2019, \u00a7 58). Ancak s\u00f6z konusu afi\u015flerin geli\u015fig\u00fczel ve s\u00fcresiz bir\u015fekilde yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve \u00e7evre kirlili\u011fine sebebiyet verece\u011fi de a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Nitekim afi\u015flerin yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 yerde daha \u00f6nce bu \u015fekilde \u00fcst \u00fcste yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lan bir\u00e7ok afi\u015f oldu\u011funa dair ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 da bu durumu ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular her ne kadar afi\u015f yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in belirli bir alan olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015f ise de bu ama\u00e7la ilgili mercilere ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131klar\u0131na dair herhangi bir bilgi verdikleri veya beyanda bulunduklar\u0131 ba\u015fvuru dosyas\u0131ndan tespit edilememi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
14. \u00d6te yandan her ne kadar bireyler iletmek istedikleri ifadelerin aktar\u0131lma \u015feklini se\u00e7mekte \u00f6zg\u00fcr iseler de internetin, sosyal medyan\u0131n ve di\u011fer ileti\u015fim olanaklar\u0131n\u0131n son derece geli\u015fti\u011fi, topluma eri\u015fmek ve fikirleri yaymak i\u00e7in bir\u00e7ok alternatif y\u00f6ntemin oldu\u011fu g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcz ko\u015fullar\u0131nda, \u00fcstelik yetkili idari makamlara ba\u015fvurarak mevzuata uygun bi\u00e7imde afi\u015flerin as\u0131lmas\u0131 da m\u00fcmk\u00fcnken g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kirlili\u011fi olu\u015fturacak bi\u00e7imde kamu alanlar\u0131na afi\u015f as\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn etkin \u015fekilde kullan\u0131m\u0131 i\u00e7in zorunlu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir (Bermal Can ve di\u011ferleri \u00a7 35). Ayr\u0131ca ba\u015fvurucular, afi\u015f yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rarak ama\u00e7lanan di\u011fer siyasal faaliyetlere m\u00fcdahale edildi\u011fini de iddia etmemi\u015ftir. Bu nedenlerle somut olay\u0131n ko\u015fullar\u0131nda afi\u015flerinin izinsiz \u015fekilde as\u0131lmas\u0131, sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve dengeli bir \u00e7evrede ya\u015fama hakk\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla getirilen hukuk normunu ihlal etmesi nedeniyle ba\u015fvuruculara uygulanan yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131n zorunlu bir sosyal ihtiyaca kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k gelmedi\u011fi s\u00f6ylenemez.<\/p>\n
15. Di\u011fer yandan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 ve d\u00fczenli bir \u00e7evrede ya\u015fama hakk\u0131na ili\u015fkin hukuk normunu ihlal etmeleri nedeniyle uygulanan hafif nitelikteki idari para cezas\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerin aktar\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin tercih hakk\u0131n\u0131 a\u015f\u0131r\u0131 bi\u00e7imde k\u0131s\u0131tlamad\u0131\u011f\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczerinde cayd\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir etki yaratacak nitelikte olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
16. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011fundan ba\u015fvurunun a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
III. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. Adli yard\u0131m talebinin KABUL\u00dcNE,<\/p>\n
B. \u0130fade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a dayanaktan yoksun olmas\u0131 nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
C. 12\/1\/2011 tarihli ve 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu\u2019nun 339. maddesinin (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca tahsil edilmesi ma\u011fduriyetine neden olaca\u011f\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demekten TAMAMEN MUAF TUTULMASINA 2\/10\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 2\/10\/2024 tarihli ve 2019\/2781 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 MESUT BAYLAV VE SAL\u0130H CAN ALDEM\u0130R BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2019\/2781) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 2\/10\/2024 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : Engin YILDIRIM \u00a0 \u00a0 R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR Raport\u00f6r : Hasan H\u00dcZMEL\u0130 Ba\u015fvurucular : 1. Mesut BAYLAV \u00a0 \u00a0 2. Salih Can ALDEM\u0130R Vekili : Av. Sevil ARACI \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN \u00d6ZET\u0130 1. Ba\u015fvuru, yetkili makamlardan izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n kamu alanlar\u0131na afi\u015f as\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanmas\u0131 nedeniyle ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. 2. Ba\u015fvurucular, Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Milletvekili Genel Se\u00e7imi’yle ilgili olan bir partiye ait olan afi\u015fleri, kova ve f\u0131r\u00e7a yard\u0131m\u0131yla elektrik trafosunun \u00fcst\u00fcne yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015flard\u0131r. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucular hakk\u0131nda izinsiz afi\u015f asma kabahatinden 30\/3\/2005 tarihli ve 5326 say\u0131l\u0131 Kabahatler Kanunu’nun 42. maddesi uyar\u0131nca ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 259 TL ve 1.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131 uygulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 3. \u0130l\u00e7e Se\u00e7im Kurulu ve \u0130l\u00e7e Belediye Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n afi\u015f yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131 kamusal alan\u0131n siyasi partilerin afi\u015f ve benzeri materyaller asabilecekleri bir yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi ilan ve reklam i\u00e7in kullan\u0131labilecek yerlerden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilgisini vermi\u015ftir. 4. Ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011fi 1.000 TL idari para cezas\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz y\u00f6n\u00fcnden cezan\u0131n 259 TL olarak …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n