T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130<\/p>\n
ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
ZEYNEP G\u00d6K\u00c7EK BA\u015eVURUSU<\/p>\n
(Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/32932)<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024<\/p>\n
R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
KARAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fkan<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Basri BA\u011eCI<\/p>\n
\u00dcyeler<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Kenan YA\u015eAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00d6mer \u00c7INAR<\/p>\n
Raport\u00f6r<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN<\/p>\n
Ba\u015fvurucu<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Zeynep G\u00d6K\u00c7EK<\/p>\n
Vekili<\/p>\n
:<\/p>\n
Av. Ali Ayd\u0131n AKPINAR<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvuru, yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama koruma tedbirlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n
II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130<\/p>\n
2. Ba\u015fvuru 17\/8\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan hakka ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
III. OLAY VE OLGULAR<\/p>\n
4. Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131 ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
5. Eski\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 13\/10\/2008 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu, ihaleye fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla kurulan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye olma su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan 16\/10\/2008 tarihinde tutuklanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
6. Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan ba\u015fvurucunun an\u0131lan su\u00e7lardan cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talebiyle d\u00fczenlenen 3\/3\/2009 tarihli iddianamenin kabul\u00fc ile a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131 Eski\u015fehir 2. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinde (Mahkeme) g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
7. Duru\u015fman\u0131n 5\/6\/2009 tarihli oturumunda ba\u015fvurucunun tahliyesine karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
8. Mahkeme 1\/10\/2013 tarihinde ba\u015fvurucunun isnat edilen su\u00e7lardan beraatine h\u00fckmetmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
9. Yarg\u0131tay 5. Ceza Dairesi (Daire) 6\/7\/2017 tarihinde baz\u0131 eksikliklerin giderilmesi amac\u0131yla dosyay\u0131 mahalline iade etmi\u015ftir. Bu eksikliklerin giderilmesinin ard\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan temyiz incelemesi neticesinde Daire, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015fmesine 17\/6\/2021 tarihinde karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
10. Ba\u015fvurucu, nihai karar\u0131 2\/8\/2021 tarihinde \u00f6\u011frendikten sonra 17\/8\/2021 tarihinde bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
IV. \u0130LG\u0130L\u0130 HUKUK<\/p>\n
A. Ulusal Hukuk<\/p>\n
1. \u0130lgili Mevzuat<\/p>\n
11. 4\/12\/2004 tarihli ve 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun “Tazminat istemi” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“Su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 veya kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 s\u0131ras\u0131nda;<\/p>\n
a) Kanunlarda belirtilen ko\u015fullar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yakalanan, tutuklanan veya tutuklulu\u011funun devam\u0131na karar verilen,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
d) Kanuna uygun olarak tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde makul s\u00fcrede yarg\u0131lama mercii huzuruna \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmayan ve bu s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmeyen,<\/p>\n
e) Kanuna uygun olarak yakaland\u0131ktan veya tutukland\u0131ktan sonra haklar\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya beraatlerine karar verilen,<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Ki\u015filer, madd\u00ee ve manev\u00ee her t\u00fcrl\u00fc zararlar\u0131n\u0131, Devletten isteyebilirler.”<\/p>\n
12. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Tazminat isteminin ko\u015fullar\u0131” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 142. maddesinin (1) ve (2) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kralar\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) Karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kesinle\u015fti\u011finin ilgilisine tebli\u011finden itibaren \u00fc\u00e7 ay ve her h\u00e2lde karar veya h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kesinle\u015fme tarihini izleyen bir y\u0131l i\u00e7inde tazminat isteminde bulunulabilir.<\/p>\n
\u00a0(2) \u0130stem, zarara u\u011frayan\u0131n oturdu\u011fu yer a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinde ve e\u011fer o yer a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesi tazminat konusu i\u015flemle ili\u015fkili ise ve ayn\u0131 yerde ba\u015fka bir a\u011f\u0131r ceza dairesi yoksa, en yak\u0131n yer a\u011f\u0131r ceza mahkemesinde karara ba\u011flan\u0131r.”<\/p>\n
13. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un “Tazminat isteyemeyecek ki\u015filer” kenar ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 144. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“(1) Kanuna uygun olarak yakalanan veya tutuklanan ki\u015filerden a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da belirtilenler tazminat isteyemezler: <\/p>\n
\u2026<\/p>\n
c) Genel veya \u00f6zel af, \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me, uzla\u015fma gibi nedenlerle hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilen veya kamu davas\u0131 ge\u00e7ici olarak durdurulan veya kamu davas\u0131 ertelenen veya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclenler. <\/p>\n
\u2026”<\/p>\n
2. Yarg\u0131tay Kararlar\u0131<\/p>\n
14. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesinin 2\/10\/2023 tarihli ve E.2021\/8870, K.2023\/3531 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 144 \u00fcnc\u00fc maddesinin 1 inci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendinde genel veya \u00f6zel af, \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me, uzla\u015fma gibi nedenlerle hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilen veya kamu davas\u0131 ge\u00e7ici olarak durdurulan veya kamu davas\u0131 ertelenen veya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclen ki\u015filerin tazminat isteyemeyece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, tazminat istemeyecek hallerin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin nedenlerin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu hallerin, su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesi sonras\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fen taraf iradelerine ya da devletin tasarruflar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak, san\u0131\u011fa ceza verilmemesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kurumlar oldu\u011fu, belirtilen maddede, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi halinde, tazminat istenemeyece\u011fine dair a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmas\u0131 halinde d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesi durumunda, bu hususun, dosyan\u0131n taraf\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinden kaynaklanmamas\u0131 halinde, davac\u0131 lehine u\u011fran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen zarara ili\u015fkin, makul bir maddi ve manevi tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, davac\u0131n\u0131n tazminat isteyemeyecek ki\u015filerden olmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulunmu\u015ftur.”<\/p>\n
15. Yarg\u0131tay 12. Ceza Dairesinin 14\/12\/2020 tarihli ve E.2019\/1876, K.2020\/6971 say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131n\u0131n ilgili k\u0131sm\u0131 \u015f\u00f6yledir:<\/p>\n
“5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 144\/1-c maddesinde genel veya \u00f6zel af, \u015fik\u00e2yetten vazge\u00e7me, uzla\u015fma gibi nedenlerle hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilen veya kamu davas\u0131 ge\u00e7ici olarak durdurulan veya kamu davas\u0131 ertelenen veya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclen ki\u015filerin tazminat isteyemeyece\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi, tazminat istemeyecek hallerin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkin nedenlerin niteli\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, bu hallerin, su\u00e7un i\u015flenmesi sonras\u0131 de\u011fi\u015fen taraf iradelerine ya da devletin tasarruflar\u0131na dayal\u0131 olarak, san\u0131\u011fa ceza verilmemesini \u00f6ng\u00f6ren kurumlar oldu\u011fu, belirtilen maddede, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi halinde, tazminat istenemeyece\u011fine dair a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmas\u0131 halinde d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesi durumunda, bu hususun, dosyan\u0131n taraf\u0131 olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinden kaynaklanmamas\u0131 halinde, haks\u0131z yere g\u00f6zalt\u0131nda veya tutuklu kalan taraf lehine u\u011fran\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddia edilen maddi ve manevi zarar i\u00e7in makul bir tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi”<\/p>\n
B. Uluslararas\u0131 Hukuk<\/p>\n
16. \u0130lgili uluslararas\u0131 hukuk i\u00e7in bkz. A.A. [GK], B. No:2017\/34502,21\/10\/2021, \u00a7\u00a7 33-39.<\/p>\n
V. \u0130NCELEME VE GEREK\u00c7E<\/p>\n
17. Anayasa Mahkemesinin 10\/7\/2024 tarihinde yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu toplant\u0131da ba\u015fvuru incelenip gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n
A. Tutuklaman\u0131n Hukuki Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131 ve Bakanl\u0131k G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc<\/p>\n
18. Ba\u015fvurucu; hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te \u00e7al\u0131\u015famamas\u0131 nedeniyle maddi zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 s\u00fcrecinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmesinden dolay\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 tutuklama koruma tedbirine kar\u015f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131 bulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131, mahkemeye eri\u015fim hakk\u0131, etkili ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 ve m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
19. Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde, Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisinin 23\/9\/2012 tarihinden sonra kesinle\u015fen nihai i\u015flem ve kararlar aleyhine yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurularla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 oldu\u011fu ancak somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2linin 9\/6\/2009 tarihinde sona erdi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu iddias\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ncelikle de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca an\u0131lan \u015fik\u00e2yetle ilgili olarak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gereken bir tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu iddia bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ola\u011fan ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131 t\u00fcketilmeden bireysel ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifade edilmi\u015ftir. Son olarak ilgili mevzuat h\u00fck\u00fcmleri, Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131 ile somut olay\u0131n kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc ko\u015fullar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
20. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyan\u0131nda hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda verilen d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131n\u0131n 17\/6\/2021 tarihinde kesinle\u015fmesi nedeniyle Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetki itiraz\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un haklar\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilen ki\u015filere tazminat talep hakk\u0131 vermemesi nedeniyle bu yola ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan ederek ba\u015fvuru formundaki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 tekrarlam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
21. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u015fik\u00e2yetinin \u00f6z\u00fc, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 tutuklama koruma tedbirine kar\u015f\u0131 tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131 tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
22. Somut olayda \u00f6ncelikle ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirilmelidir.<\/p>\n
23. Anayasa Mahkemesi, Siyami H\u0131d\u0131ro\u011flu ([GK], B. No: 2018\/11489, 11\/1\/2024) karar\u0131nda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat yolunu Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisinin ba\u015flad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten sonra t\u00fcketen ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisizlik nedeniyle kabul edilemezlik karar\u0131 verilmemesi gerekti\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Siyami H\u0131d\u0131ro\u011flu, \u00a7\u00a7 29-32). Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun tutukluluk h\u00e2li 9\/6\/2009 tarihinde sona ermi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131nda y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 17\/6\/2021 tarihinde neticelenmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucunun yarg\u0131lama neticesinde d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131ndan yararlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki \u015fik\u00e2yetinin niteli\u011fi g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda somut olayda da an\u0131lan karardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu nedenle di\u011fer kabul edilemezlik kriterleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bir de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir.<\/p>\n
24. 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un koruma tedbirleri nedeniyle tazminat isteyemeyecek ki\u015fileri d\u00fczenleyen 144. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (c) bendi kanuna uygun olarak yakalanan ve tutuklananlar a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erlidir (benzer de\u011ferlendirmeler i\u00e7in bkz. Eyy\u00fcp G\u00fcne\u015f [GK], B. No: 2017\/28308, 21\/10\/2021, \u00a7 91). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya tutukland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia eden ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131 ya da kovu\u015fturmas\u0131 neticesinde kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, beraat ya da d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 tazminat talep etme hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden belirleyici de\u011fildir. Bu nedenle ba\u015fvurucunun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama tedbirleri ile ilgili olarak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca dava a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
25. Kald\u0131 ki Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihad\u0131na g\u00f6re 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 144. maddesinde zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle davan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmesine karar verilmesi h\u00e2linde tazminat istenemeyece\u011fine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7\u0131k bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmamaktad\u0131r. Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n bu konudaki yerle\u015fik i\u00e7tihad\u0131 uyar\u0131nca dava zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin dolmas\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemlerinden kaynaklanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 durumlarda haks\u0131z g\u00f6zalt\u0131 veya tutuklama koruma tedbirlerine maruz kalan san\u0131klar lehine u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131 maddi ve manevi zarar i\u00e7in makul bir tazminata h\u00fckmedilebilir (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 14, 15).<\/p>\n
26. Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda hakk\u0131ndaki kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilen ba\u015fvurucunun 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi uyar\u0131nca tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyen herhangi bir kanuni d\u00fczenleme veya yarg\u0131sal uygulama bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
27. Bununla birlikte Anayasa Mahkemesi, Abdullah Aky\u00fcz ([GK], B. No: 2013\/9352, 2\/7\/2015) ve Halas Aslan (B. No: 2014\/4994, 16\/2\/2017) kararlar\u0131nda t\u00fcketilmesi gereken ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n her \u015feyden \u00f6nce ula\u015f\u0131labilir olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ve mevzuatta bu yollara yer verilmesinin tek ba\u015f\u0131na yeterli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmi\u015ftir. An\u0131lan kararlarda, tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bireysel ba\u015fvurunun karara ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih itibar\u0131yla tazminat talebinde bulunulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi durumlarda, bu tazminat yolunun ula\u015f\u0131labilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve t\u00fcketilmesinin gerekmedi\u011fi sonucuna ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Abdullah Aky\u00fcz, \u00a7\u00a7 45-50; Halas Aslan, \u00a7\u00a7 47-50). Anayasa Mahkemesi Abdullah Aky\u00fcz karar\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca belirtilen sonuca ula\u015f\u0131rken tazminat talebinde bulunmak i\u00e7in 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrenin (bkz. \u00a7 12) ge\u00e7mesinde ba\u015fvurucuya izafe edilebilecek herhangi bir kusurun olmamas\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmu\u015ftur (Abdullah Aky\u00fcz, \u00a7 49).<\/p>\n
28. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla benzer nitelikteki ba\u015fvurular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bireysel ba\u015fvurunun inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 142. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131nda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrenin (bkz. \u00a7 12) ge\u00e7ip ge\u00e7medi\u011fine ba\u011fl\u0131 olarak farkl\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara ula\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu kapsamda tutuklamaya konu ceza davalar\u0131 kesinle\u015fmi\u015f ba\u015fvuruculardan, bireysel ba\u015fvurusu belirtilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde incelenenler hakk\u0131nda ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi, bireysel ba\u015fvurusu bu s\u00fcreler ge\u00e7tikten sonra incelenenler hakk\u0131nda 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131labilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucunun ma\u011fduriyetini giderebilecek nitelikte t\u00fcketilmesi gereken bir ba\u015fvuru yolu bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmektedir (benzer y\u00f6nde karar i\u00e7in bkz. Halas Aslan, \u00a7 49). Bu i\u00e7tihat farkl\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131, benzer durumdaki ba\u015fvurucular aras\u0131nda kendilerinden kaynaklanmayan ve bireysel ba\u015fvurulara konu edilen yarg\u0131sal s\u00fcre\u00e7lerin d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda geli\u015fen sebeplerle farkl\u0131 kararlar verilmesine neden olmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
29. Anayasa Mahkemesine bireysel ba\u015fvuru usul\u00fcn\u00fcn y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden k\u0131sa bir s\u00fcre sonra verilen Abdullah Aky\u00fcz karar\u0131 ile ortaya konan i\u00e7tihat, karar\u0131n verildi\u011fi tarih (2\/7\/2015) itibar\u0131yla benzer \u015fik\u00e2yetlerle bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunmu\u015f ki\u015filerin kendilerinden kaynaklanmayan ve \u00f6ng\u00f6remeyecekleri ma\u011fduriyetlerle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fmalar\u0131 ihtimalinin ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olduk\u00e7a \u00f6nemlidir. Bu i\u00e7tihat \u00f6zellikle Abdullah Aky\u00fcz karar\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten \u00f6nce Anayasa Mahkemesine yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden hukuki belirlilik ve \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilirli\u011fin sa\u011flanmas\u0131na katk\u0131da bulunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
30. Bununla birlikte s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n verildi\u011fi tarihten bu yana Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tutuklamaya konu davan\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde ba\u015fvurucular\u0131n tutuklaman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131na y\u00f6nelik olarak 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinin (1) numaral\u0131 f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n (a) bendi kapsam\u0131nda tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7abilece\u011fini belirtmi\u015f ve an\u0131lan iddiay\u0131 ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez bulmu\u015ftur (Re\u015fat Ertan, B. No: 2013\/5700, 15\/4\/2015, \u00a7 26; \u00d6mer K\u00f6se, B. No: 2014\/12036, 16\/11\/2016, \u00a7 34; Eyy\u00fcp G\u00fcne\u015f [GK], B. No: 2017\/28308, 21\/10\/2021, \u00a7 88; Murat A\u011f\u0131rel ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2020\/11655, 7\/4\/2022, \u00a7\u00a7 23-26). Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla Abdullah Aky\u00fcz karar\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131mland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten sonra bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunan benzer durumdaki ba\u015fvurucular y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da d\u00fczenlenen tazminat davas\u0131 yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki Yarg\u0131tay ve Anayasa Mahkemesi i\u00e7tihad\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle Abdullah Aky\u00fcz karar\u0131nda ortaya konulan ve sonraki pek \u00e7ok karar ile takip edilen i\u00e7tihad\u0131n bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincillik niteli\u011fi ile uygun h\u00e2le getirilmesinde fayda bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
31. Bu kapsamda tutuklaman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular\u0131n kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinde, ba\u015fvurucu hakk\u0131ndaki davan\u0131n kesinle\u015fmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7ip ge\u00e7medi\u011fi dikkate al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n ayn\u0131 Kanun’da d\u00fczenlenen ve etkili bir hukuk yolu olan tazminat davas\u0131 yolunun t\u00fcketilip t\u00fcketilmedi\u011fi belirlenmelidir. S\u00f6z konusu yolun t\u00fcketilmedi\u011finin tespiti h\u00e2linde ise ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi bireysel ba\u015fvurunun ikincillik niteli\u011finin gere\u011fidir.<\/p>\n
32. Somut olayda bireysel ba\u015fvurunun inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen dava a\u00e7ma s\u00fcresinin ge\u00e7ti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ancak hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay\u0131n zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 ile kesin olarak sona eren ba\u015fvurucu, -Abdullah Aky\u00fcz karar\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131ndan \u00f6nceki d\u00f6nemde benzer \u015fik\u00e2yetlerle bireysel ba\u015fvuruda bulunan ba\u015fvuruculardan farkl\u0131 olarak- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde d\u00fczenlenen tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131n ula\u015f\u0131labilir ve etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011funu \u00f6ng\u00f6rebilecek durumdad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
33. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 tutuklama koruma tedbirinden kaynaklanan ma\u011fduriyetinin giderilmesi amac\u0131yla ba\u015fvurabilece\u011fi tazminat davas\u0131 yolunu t\u00fcketme hususunda gerekli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermedi\u011finin ve inceleme tarihi itibar\u0131yla tazminat talebinde bulunmak i\u00e7in 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’da \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcrenin ge\u00e7mesinden sorumlu oldu\u011funun alt\u0131 \u00e7izilmelidir.<\/p>\n
34. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
B. Tutuklulu\u011fun Makul S\u00fcreyi A\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia<\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
35. Ba\u015fvurucu, tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
36. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun iddialar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fcn tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin Anayasa’n\u0131n 19. maddesinin yedinci ve dokuzuncu f\u0131kralar\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
37. Yukar\u0131da ba\u015fvurunun Anayasa Mahkemesinin zaman bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yetkisi kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funa (bkz. \u00a7 23), hakk\u0131nda zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 nedeniyle d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131 verilen ba\u015fvurucunun 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 yoluna ba\u015fvurmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyen bir d\u00fczenleme ve yarg\u0131sal uygulama bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 24-26) ve d\u00fc\u015fme karar\u0131n\u0131n kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra ba\u015fvurucunun s\u00f6z konusu tazminat davas\u0131 yolunu t\u00fcketme hususunda yeterli \u00f6zeni g\u00f6stermedi\u011fine (bkz. \u00a7\u00a7 27-33) ili\u015fkin olarak yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme ve ula\u015f\u0131lan sonu\u00e7lar tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddia y\u00f6n\u00fcnden de ge\u00e7erlidir.<\/p>\n
38. Anayasa Mahkemesi, bir\u00e7ok karar\u0131nda tutuklulu\u011fun kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen azami s\u00fcreyi veya makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla yap\u0131lan bireysel ba\u015fvurular bak\u0131m\u0131ndan bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla ba\u015fvurucu tahliye edilmi\u015f veya h\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc h\u00e2le gelmi\u015f ise as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Erkam Abdurrahman Ak, B. No: 2014\/8515, 28\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 48-62; \u0130rfan Ger\u00e7ek, B. No: 2014\/6500, 29\/9\/2016, \u00a7\u00a7 33-45; Ahmet Kubilay Tezcan, B. No: 2014\/3473, 25\/1\/2018, \u00a7 26; Musa Kartal, B. No: 2020\/26513, 20\/6\/2023, \u00a7 18). Somut olayda 9\/6\/2009 tarihinde tahliyesine karar verilen ve hakk\u0131ndaki ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 17\/6\/2021 tarihinde sona eren ba\u015fvurucu y\u00f6n\u00fcnden an\u0131lan kararlardan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durumun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n
39. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
C. Yakalama ve G\u00f6zalt\u0131 Tedbirlerinin Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Oldu\u011funa \u0130li\u015fkin \u0130ddia <\/p>\n
1. Ba\u015fvurucunun \u0130ddialar\u0131<\/p>\n
40. Ba\u015fvurucu, \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde yakalan\u0131p g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fini iddia etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n
2. De\u011ferlendirme<\/p>\n
41. Anayasa Mahkemesi, kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen g\u00f6zalt\u0131 s\u00fcresinin a\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 veya yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nman\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak bireysel ba\u015fvurunun incelendi\u011fi tarih itibar\u0131yla as\u0131l dava sonu\u00e7lanmam\u0131\u015f da olsa -ilgili Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131na at\u0131f yaparak- 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 141. maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7ma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmesi gereken etkili bir hukuk yolu oldu\u011fu sonucuna varm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (Hikmet Kopar ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2014\/14061, 8\/4\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 64-72; Hidayet Karaca [GK], B. No: 2015\/144, 14\/7\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 53-64; \u0130brahim S\u00f6nmez ve Nazmiye Kaya, B. No: 2013\/3193, 15\/10\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 34-47; G\u00fcnay Da\u011f ve di\u011ferleri [GK], B. No: 2013\/1631, 17\/12\/2015, \u00a7\u00a7 141-150).<\/p>\n
42. Somut olayda ba\u015fvurucunun yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirlerinin hukuki olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddias\u0131yla ilgili olarak an\u0131lan kararlarda var\u0131lan sonu\u00e7tan ayr\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektiren bir durum bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n
43. A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle ba\u015fvurunun bu k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar verilmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n
VI. H\u00dcK\u00dcM<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle;<\/p>\n
A. 1. Tutuklaman\u0131n hukuki olmamas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
2. Tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
3. Yakalama ve g\u00f6zalt\u0131 tedbirlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin iddian\u0131n ba\u015fvuru yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemesi nedeniyle KABUL ED\u0130LEMEZ OLDU\u011eUNA,<\/p>\n
B. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin ba\u015fvurucu \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA 10\/7\/2024 tarihinde OYB\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130YLE karar verildi.a<\/p>\n
\u200bAnayasa Mahkemesi’nin 10\/7\/2024 tarihli ve 2021\/32932 ba\u015fvuru numaral\u0131 karar\u0131\u00a0Hukuki Haber<\/p>\n
Haberin Al\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kaynak: www.hukukihaber.net<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T\u00dcRK\u0130YE CUMHUR\u0130YET\u0130 ANAYASA MAHKEMES\u0130 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 ZEYNEP G\u00d6K\u00c7EK BA\u015eVURUSU (Ba\u015fvuru Numaras\u0131: 2021\/32932) \u00a0 Karar Tarihi: 10\/7\/2024 R.G. Tarih ve Say\u0131: 3\/12\/2024-32741 \u00a0 \u0130K\u0130NC\u0130 B\u00d6L\u00dcM \u00a0 KARAR \u00a0 Ba\u015fkan : Basri BA\u011eCI \u00dcyeler : R\u0131dvan G\u00dcLE\u00c7 \u00a0 \u00a0 Y\u0131ld\u0131z SEFER\u0130NO\u011eLU \u00a0 \u00a0 Kenan YA\u015eAR \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00d6mer \u00c7INAR Raport\u00f6r : Y\u00fcksel G\u00dcNARSLAN Ba\u015fvurucu : Zeynep G\u00d6K\u00c7EK Vekili : Av. Ali Ayd\u0131n AKPINAR \u00a0 I. BA\u015eVURUNUN KONUSU 1. Ba\u015fvuru, yakalama, g\u00f6zalt\u0131 ve tutuklama koruma tedbirlerinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 ve tutuklulu\u011fun makul s\u00fcreyi a\u015fmas\u0131 nedeniyle ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlal edildi\u011fi iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. II. BA\u015eVURU S\u00dcREC\u0130 2. Ba\u015fvuru 17\/8\/2021 tarihinde yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Komisyon, ki\u015fi h\u00fcrriyeti ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi hakk\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki \u015fik\u00e2yetlerin kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa, an\u0131lan hakka ili\u015fkin \u015fik\u00e2yetin kabul edilebilirlik incelemesinin B\u00f6l\u00fcm taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015ftir. 3. Ba\u015fvuru belgelerinin bir \u00f6rne\u011fi bilgi i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na (Bakanl\u0131k) g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. Bakanl\u0131k, g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirmi\u015ftir. Ba\u015fvurucu, Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcne kar\u015f\u0131 beyanda bulunmu\u015ftur. III. OLAY VE OLGULAR 4. Ba\u015fvuru formlar\u0131 ve eklerinde ifade edildi\u011fi \u015fekliyle ve Ulusal Yarg\u0131 A\u011f\u0131 Bili\u015fim Sistemi (UYAP) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla eri\u015filen bilgi ve belgeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde olaylar \u00f6zetle \u015f\u00f6yledir: 5. Eski\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 (Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131k) taraf\u0131ndan y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen bir soru\u015fturma kapsam\u0131nda 13\/10\/2008 tarihinde g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan ba\u015fvurucu, ihaleye fesat kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma ve su\u00e7 i\u015flemek amac\u0131yla kurulan \u00f6rg\u00fcte \u00fcye …<\/p>","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[27,535],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hukukihaber","category-uncategorized-tr"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n